TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

timeforknowledge Archive

View 12 posts and 159 comments by timeforknowledge on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6466

Discriminationtimeforknowledge/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:32 PM
1105

False Accusationtimeforknowledge/r/MensRights24/05/23 09:52 AM
670

Discriminationtimeforknowledge/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:10 AM
274

Generaltimeforknowledge/r/MensRights15/12/20 08:55 AM
194

Discriminationtimeforknowledge/r/MensRights22/10/21 09:38 AM
177

False Accusationtimeforknowledge/r/MensRights19/10/23 07:14 AM
140

Social Issuestimeforknowledge/r/MensRights23/10/18 08:04 PM
86

Social Issuestimeforknowledge/r/MensRights18/04/17 05:14 PM
70

Generaltimeforknowledge/r/MensRights28/09/21 10:55 AM
63

Healthtimeforknowledge/r/MensRights09/04/20 07:35 AM
33

False Accusationtimeforknowledge/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:02 PM
1

Discriminationtimeforknowledge/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:32 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I think it's like getting a user banned. If you get a bunch of people to report them they will get auto banned, and will have to wait until a person investigates. I wonder if it's the same for subs?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:23 AM
8

I'm surprised you think this is an original comment. No offense but when you get into a relationship with someone who has a child you must accept the fact that child will always come before you. And if you don't understand that then have your own kids and you'll understand why. A parent has to and should do what ever is best for the child. From the moment your child is born everyone else becomes secondary. It sounds like you've had a bad experience because you didn't realise this.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:02 AM
8

I don't know but it's likely they are giving women 2500 or more calories, which is the recommended daily amount for men. So it's more likely everyone will be getting more than they need
/r/MensRights08/06/26 09:41 AM
13

It's a fair point, it's crazy men that stayed in Ukraine are being abducted from the streets while those that left have no intention of ever returning. What prospects are there pre or post war? It's an ugly comment but it's a awful reality
/r/MensRights06/06/26 06:11 PM
-10

Lol they are not going to a theme park, in some cases they are forced to take the day off as sick leave or holiday and they spend the day in bed very ill. It's a good idea but it's an incredibly awkward in practice, do you really want all your male colleagues knowing when you're on your period, do you really want to announce to your male colleagues you'll have to do the big presentation / pitch without me because I'm having a day off for a period. Can we trust a woman with an important business …
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:39 AM
0

The man will know. If it was building up to it flirting etc throughout the evening then it's consensual. If he made it clear from the beginning it won't happen and later is drunk and it does happen and he feels he did not consent or was not in a state that he could give consent then yes that's rape. You will know when it happens to you. Society makes men believe they cannot be raped because they are bigger, the reality is drugs and alcohol can put you into a state that allows people to manipulat…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:33 AM
8

That's ridiculous. Any amount of alcohol can affect people in different ways and even if he wasn't drunk there are other factors that could compel him to do something he didn't want to do. Women can consent to sex on video and it can still be rape if they later stated they did it under duress or they stop and the person didn't stop.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:31 AM
11

Who cares 99% of army roles are logistics; truck drivers, mechanics, IT, cooks, PT etc etc There's no reason why women can't do the 99% It's much better to double the size of your army while putting people in physical roles that suit them rather than just saying no women and struggling Men over 6? foot can't be fighter pilots, doesn't mean they can't join the RAF
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:48 AM
106

Ukraine women are currently in the UK with free housing and they get weekly money to buy clothes and food. There's no way they are going back to Ukraine and there's no way the UK government will make them go back
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:31 PM
2

It really needs changing. It's worth noting though... An SA conviction can be just as long as even longer than a rape conviction. But I agree it should be gender neutral as it creates bias
/r/MensRights04/01/25 09:05 PM
4

Good look proving it. This is exactly why sexual assault convictions are so low. It's your word against their word, without evidence you can't get a fine
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:14 AM
6

46% of women came out for trump. Every other woman you meet is a trump supporter... The irony is democrat women are angry but don't want to blame the women that to them "betrayed them"
/r/MensRights07/11/24 09:56 PM
24

Two X has been shitting on men for a long time, it's actually funny how crazy that sub is going. And ofc who is to blame?? Men! No other factors need to be considered!
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:49 PM
26

I don't want to be that person... But... Please (especially in London), do not block someone and prevent them going about their business, old men, women, even girls are all fair gain for these kinds of people. Your gender / age won't prevent you getting assaulted. If you want to be a hero then by all means ask, but don't physically stop someone...
/r/MensRights15/10/24 01:49 PM
34

I overhear many when I go shopping, they are literally buying new clothes going out for nice dinners and living in the UK. While men in their home country die.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 08:29 AM
2

Yes what ever it takes. The idea of women teaching boys about masculinity is as ridiculous as middle aged men teaching girls what it means to be a woman
/r/MensRights26/07/24 09:32 AM
8

Why don't they try just hiring male teachers!? 80% female teachers is crazy
/r/MensRights25/07/24 10:00 AM
3

Yes agreed
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:49 PM
42

You may not like this but I believe this is not considered rape. A woman doing this to a man would be considered sexual assault, but regardless of the words used the sentencing can be equivalent. It's an extremely convoluted issue and every case is unique. Your biggest issue is you're a man so if you accuse her she is just going to accuse you back and no one is going to believe you because you're a man.... If you want to make a formal complaint to police then first text her and say hey I want yo…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 03:28 PM
7

A man in full on Netflix, showed a fully erect penis... It also showed two sex scenes yet no female nudity. I think there is a strange thing where for men nothing has changed but for women it's now taboo?
/r/MensRights12/05/24 05:04 PM
120

There's an irony to this that they were opened up to women, a couple of women joined and men stopped going. Women that campaigned for the spaces to become mixed never had any interest in actually signing up/ going to these spaces... The club's then closed down as they were not getting enough people.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 02:13 PM
2

She shouldn't be allowed anywhere near children...
/r/MensRights23/04/24 09:45 AM
1

The UK legal system needs a complete overhaul. This is just shocking
/r/MensRights23/04/24 09:44 AM
1

Finally the right to choose what is done to your body is respected
/r/MensRights09/04/24 09:10 AM
3

Abhorrent Imo it should be protected human right that you should be able to choose what things are done to your body. It should be treated the same way as female genital multination and made illegal. If you want to do it when you're legally an adult at 18 then that's fine. But no person should get to decide what is done to your body, it should be for you alone to choose. I just cannot fathom how it can be legal in the UK the same country that won't let you get a tattoo until you're 18
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:21 AM
3

People that can't run away back to their own country when shit kicks off. They have to stay and fight for their country. The biggest irony is those saying they would leave and go back to their own country are the reason their country is not as good as the UK. Instead making the country better they just leave
/r/MensRights29/02/24 08:39 AM
127

The interview for this is hilarious, they go around London asking if you would fight for the UK and 90% of people say they are not British they are from xyz
/r/MensRights28/02/24 02:52 PM
6

That statement is literally the reason women are not nice... Gaslighting mens issues is way worse than a woman outright being mean...
/r/MensRights20/11/23 09:15 AM
4

Well most women were oppressed in the sense they lacked the same rights as men historically. So no point lowering yourself to argue about historical facts. However it's now almost the opposite, while women's biggest issues is money mens biggest issues are suicide and homelessness, violence against men and prison time. There's also bias towards hiring minorities and women over white men I would simply say what are the biggest issues facing you as a woman? She will say gender pay gap. You can say …
/r/MensRights16/11/23 10:27 AM
5

Just saw a great comment on another thread; In the old days the director/writers would be blamed for a terrible movie, and never the audience
/r/MensRights14/11/23 09:50 AM
6

What's an example to better help me understand the argument. From my point of view; you want more women in IT. Then you have to force girls to do IT education at school and uni and wait 5+ years for them to go through the education systems and come out into the work pools. What you cannot do is punish men by exclusively recruiting only women for an IT job in order to diversify your workplace.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 11:16 AM
8

The main issue is the discussions should always be around equality but instead are heavily accusative. Men should never have to lose anything in order for women to gain equality, and feminists are disadvantaging themselves by parroting men are the issue.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 10:17 AM
-16

And if you read anything I have put them you would know obviously I disagree with boys being kept inside. As I have said, you will never resolve gendered issues without the cooperation of both genders. As you've said punishing one side will only create a disdain for the other. I want men's issues to be recognised and discussed by women, but to do that I have to accept and give women the opportunity to discuss and highlight the issues they face even if those issues seem lesser. E.g. women's bigge…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 10:39 AM
-17

I disagree. International mens day has always been raising awareness for those that aren't aware of what men have to go through and the issues they face.. It's stupid to aim that awareness at just men, they already know the issues they are going through, it's like telling a homeless man 75% of homeless people are men. He knows. Women on the other hand have no idea what men are going through, so on international men's day men should be talking and sharing with each other but also more importantly…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 10:15 AM
-31

The irony is that international women's day is actually for men... Women know what they are going through the point is to raise awareness to the opposite sex so they can understand their issues. Same with men's day, it's always been about raising awareness for those that don't experience the issues...
/r/MensRights03/11/23 08:42 AM
14

Feminism isn't the issue imo. The issue for men is dating apps. I'll explain this poorly but what happens is this... Before dating apps you only dated people you'd meet organically. How many 10/10 would a woman meet on a night out? 0 and even if they did they wouldn't talk to them. This meant any guy regardless of looks, if they had the confidence could go speak to women and get a date Now with dating apps women have access to thousands and thousands of men, they do not swipe/match on anyone les…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 09:06 AM
8

This has become so common now. Ever since the metoo movement people think they can just abuse men and not face any reproach. It's ridiculous
/r/MensRights31/07/23 02:41 PM
4

I actually think it's also terrible how women treat other women especially in the workplace. In a weird way it feels like men have accepted women into previously male dominated areas but then women coming into those areas do not treat other women with that same respect. It's like they want to be the only dominant woman in that space so at times undermine female coworkers. The amount of crying women I've seen at work is actually kind of ridiculous and all because of other women....
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:49 AM
177

Educated men... They literally having a crisis in the USA where too many people have degrees but no jobs to pay off student loan. Definitely about money. Interview women in how much they want their partner to earn and they all say 6 figures. Not one says I just care about their education... Women are looking for the top 1% of earners and then giving up when they can't find them
/r/MensRights19/07/23 04:39 PM
6

Schools are in urgent need of support to combat alarming rates of sexism, sexual harassment, intimidation and disrespect towards women and girls in Australian schools. Then hire some men ffs. Boys are not going to listen to female teachers opinions on masculinity for the same reasons girls and women don't listen to what boys and men think femininity should be. It's so bizarre that women of all people think their opinions on what a man should be needs to be followed even though their gender spent…
/r/MensRights15/06/23 10:53 AM
13

It's crazy in a legal advice sub that wasn't advised and discussed
/r/MensRights24/05/23 02:15 PM
4

Literally EU countries are crammed full of Ukrainian women and children , they get free housing and they get given enough money to live on, they don't even have to work. Meanwhile men are not allowed to leave the war torn country... What bs
/r/MensRights09/03/23 09:13 AM
10

If you see discrimination then bring attention to it. Don't write a list and wait for a specific day... That's why it's stupid, raising awareness for issues facing men is a 365 days a year job...
/r/MensRights08/03/23 04:06 PM
11

Why the fuck are they touching a new hire in a flirty way at a work event. Don't shit where you get paid to shit... He doesn't deserve to get fired, but come on... I try to avoid all situations at work where I have to be alone with a woman because we get non stop posts and news about false accusations utterly destroying innocent mens lives. Edit: You and your career are worth more than any woman you'll ever meet at work, so don't waste your time with them.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:12 PM
9

Wow, done to save money but don't care about breaching human rights
/r/MensRights10/11/22 02:48 PM
25

There is no evidence to support that claim. I can just say the same about women.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:42 AM
9

This is the problem with women using "men" or "all men" it's never some men are the issue. I hate the generalisation as it's just not fair to assume all men are bad or have an agenda just because you have had a bad experience with a few.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 07:27 AM
30

I love the idea that they are some how doing women a favour by saying women should abstain from sex. Women want sex too... It's actually very sexist to assume all women dislike sex and a do it as a chore. It's 2022 women are hooking up with different guys every week. Not to mention all the women selling themselves on onlyfans and tinder making £100k+ a year.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:24 PM
5

I got banned from a r/entertainment and called a Terf for simply asking if JK Rowling has explicitly said she is anti trans. I was being genuine I genuinely did not know what her actual position was. Which is exactly what I said to the mod and then I got muted for 30 days... The crazy part is I'm Pro trans and don't even like JK Rowling but feel misinformation needs calling out. It's like crazy level woke, you can't even ask for a source or you'll be called names banned and muted.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 03:01 PM
2

This is actually the reason women won't go topless even in places where it is legal for years. The thought of men staring, commenting, taking pictures puts them off. It's like if it was legal for men to walk around nude do you actually personally know any that would?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:58 PM
4

In the UK rape is defined as penetration of the mouth, vagina or anus with a penis, anything else is sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:46 AM
3

This is something men can honestly answer because it involves them. The answer is the opposite, men move out the way of women. Men are expected to let women go first. Men are expected to open doors for women. Men even use you have stand at the table when a woman got up or sat down
/r/MensRights10/12/21 11:25 PM
1

First article on Google: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-58401238.amp
/r/MensRights01/10/21 08:00 AM
2

Not even the police or judges deny this and they specifically state - "if more victims are out there then they are more likely to come forward knowing the accused is on trial" Although there's pretty much zero chance of the accused being some serial rapist...
/r/MensRights20/04/21 07:30 AM
2

It's a fake article based on a true story: Under 15 boys beat the US women's football team https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-4389760/amp/USA-women-s-team-suffer-5-2-loss-FC-Dallas-U-15-boys.html
/r/MensRights12/04/21 03:31 PM
19

Really sad to see how many comments there are and how most have not told anyone they just have to go through it alone
/r/MensRights21/12/20 05:17 PM
49

Why would they she gender the issue over such a small margin, and then ignore the fact that working age men are in a worse position Edit: Writer is a woman
/r/MensRights15/12/20 09:11 AM
3

The issue around the term "rape" is as follows: "Rape is when a person intentionally penetrates another's vagina, anus or mouth with a penis, without the other person's consent." - Met police The police cannot define this as rape because it simply does not fit their definition. The term rape for them centers on penetration. If a 32 year old man has non penetration with a 14 year old girl then (I'm guessing) they would define that as sexual assault. https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-inf…
/r/MensRights02/12/20 11:21 AM
12

That's not the point of the day. It's specifically about spreading awareness of the issues faced by men. Businesses with a global reach are in the best position for this. Google do this for women but not for men, which tells us it's not about raising awareness its about free advertisement. Women spread and share the Google logo, they fear a backlash for doing the same for men so don't do it. If they truly cared they would do it for both genders.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 04:32 PM
1

Ah yes you are very right. I'll update my comment reflect that.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 06:44 PM
6

(Edit updated comments as I am discussing colon not prostate) I don't know what you want me to say. Your first source on your first comment States the estimated deaths: Breast Cancer 47-52k Colon £53k And now you are linking different sources that undermine your first source. Which source should I base my opinion from? Cancer.Net Or cancer.gov?
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:54 PM
4

50k...? You have a 1 in 5 chance surviving beast cancer Vs a 1 in 3 for colon. I'm not arguing in just relaying what is written in the source
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:51 PM
23

(edit: on mobile and while I correctly listed the values for colon cancer we are discussing prostate cancer not colon) Most common but not most deadly. Prostate Colon and rectal cancer is still a bigger killer and that's from the chart you linked... Prostate Colon and rectal Cancer is nearly twice as deadly as breast cancer? Cancer.Gov chart: Breast Cancer - 270k diagnosed - 52k deaths. Colon and rectal Cancer - 150K diagnosed - 53k deaths. Prostate cancer - 190k - 33k deaths A big contributor t…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:35 PM
3

They are so stupid. A right to know someone's pay - fair discussion. A right to know a man's pay - sexist discussion that needs shutting down.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 07:28 AM
8

Disgusting, more men suffer from MGM that women do from fgm.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 10:06 AM
1

Yet men are more likely to die and therefore be affected by it than women...
/r/MensRights06/08/20 06:48 AM
3

I'm quite sure a large percentage of women would think the same
/r/MensRights05/08/20 01:48 PM
4

Is this true...?
/r/MensRights31/07/20 02:34 PM
16

No offence but imo that's ridiculous... We should be looking to create equality not create inequality just so we can say ha your argument is invalid. Object to any and all injustice.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 11:06 AM
6

He's got balls taking on an angry mob like that
/r/MensRights08/06/20 12:40 PM
2

Such a toxic community, I never go there any more I followed to try and get a balanced view but it's just a handful eco chamber
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:00 PM
7

Who decides that? The most important issue will be the issue faced by you/your gender. If suicide is not applicable to your gender then your gender rights movement will cover something else and bury any opposition. Men's rights are forced to be a reactionary movement, we have to force these issues to the surface because issues like womens pay or women going topless will always get the media attention and be front and center of debates. Feminism in the 21st century has created a systematic issue …
/r/MensRights29/04/20 10:57 AM
12

That statement is overused and incorrect. There is a limit to time and money these two things are not infinite. This means if a government has £1 million to run a campaign to highlight issues faced by a gender you would want 500k to go towards 1 minutes television advert for topless women and 500k to go towards 1 minute television advert for male suicide. One issue is about loss of life and the other is a non issue which you'll find is actually caused by womens aversion to not wanting to go topl…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 10:19 AM
25

That comment about judging competency based on nothing more than looks/gender really sums up how retarded that movement is. Forget qualifications as long as you're a woman you've got my vote
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:52 PM
30

Sadly because of quota systems in my country I can't stop myself thinking are they the best at their job or are they simply filling a quota?
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:50 PM
-8

Perhaps not reversed and this movie is bad but come on we cannot say women are not depicted as a useless squawking damsel in distress in 99% of movies to date can we?
/r/MensRights29/03/20 08:28 AM
1

I don't live in the USA so yes. I am obviously only talking about my country where there is full equality and the only thing left to moan and try to enforce are illogical job quotas
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:12 PM
8

We are not talking about the world we are talking about our first world countries where women believe they deserve a day to preach about money while also stating there should be no official day for men's issues.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:03 PM
0

Why do you follow this group if you don't support it. Go back to twox because everything here is going to make your blood boil.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:01 PM
29

I wouldn't say the day is for protection, it is for education. If people were really educated into issues faced by men there would not even be a woman's Day anymore as people would consider it obsolete when compared. One gender feels they don't get enough money while the other struggles with suicide, mental issues and medical conditions which their gender and society feel they have to hide and not talk about. As well as a bunch of other issues. The list of issues facing men not only exceeds issu…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 10:02 AM
10

Biggest issues for men are mental issues and suicide while biggest issues for women is money. Why can't society see which desperately needs more attention?
/r/MensRights08/03/20 05:39 PM
12

Another reason we need international men's day/week. Women just don't know about these issues.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 09:17 AM
1

Lol it's not about what I like or don't like it's about logic and upholding my countries laws and rights to treat everyone equally. I don't even see why this needs to be discuased you're never going to get the courts to retract equality law to simply to allow discrimination. They will never do that. A public business has a legal obligation to not discriminate those that do can face legal action and jail. It's so sad in 2020 I'm having to explain why having a sign on your door saying no Irish is …
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:59 PM
1

Men only spaces, I think there should be far more of. Business that only offers services to X gender or X race I have massive issues with. People are getting confused thinking I'm against men having their own space when in reality in simply against one gender telling another they cannot use their public business. I'm for equality I'm not going to support anything that affects peoples needs e.g. if I'm a woman and I have a barber next door and I have hair shorter than men but I can't go as it's a…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:49 PM
1

And you don't get to illegally discriminate based on gender. You say women only gyms are bad well so are men only barbers. You are all contradicting yourselves saying you want men only businesses but don't want women only business. That's inequality and it's not what this group is for. This group is for equality.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:52 PM
0

You said I wouldn't be welcome...
/r/MensRights17/02/20 07:18 PM
0

If you post on this sub saying only women should be allowed to access gyms then yes I would argue that it is discriminate. You said fight for, I don't think arguing in Reddit is fighting for anything...
/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:54 PM
0

Exactly so why do you care the occasional girl who has short hair but doesn't want to be ripped off by a hairdresser getting their hair cut there? This is really a non issue so for them to discriminate is kinda stupid, it would rarely happen and it would be a massive help.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:52 PM
1

Discrimination based on gender is wrong regardless of which gender is doing it to who. That's the concept I thought we all knew. That's what we are fighting for; equality.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:27 PM
0

Lol so first women are banned and then only certain men can enter.... You want to make a private club/charity for men that's fine you can even get the hairdresser's to go there everyone can talk about women without a worry. You want to create a public business that discriminates then no sorry that is some feminazi level shit created to punish the other gender. You want this movement to be referred to as Nazi then by all means carry on illegally discriminating against people.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:18 PM
0

Nothing to be lost? It's illegal in the UK to discriminate based on gender and are entire movement will be branded sexist and discriminatory. The best thing about men's movement is it's based solely on logic unlike radical feminism that seeks to punish men and boys. Telling women you can only shop at these places is negative and wrong. I doubt men with long hair who wish to get it styled at a fancy hairdresser and pay £60+ will be told they cannot enter. But this is a serious issue for women who…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:05 PM
0

I don't think I've given the impression spaces should not exist. I'm just saying we are crossing line by saying I'm withholding business from you because of your gender. That is feminist territory of no logic but rather punish and segregate the other Gender. We shouldn't lower ourselves to that.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:48 PM
0

What do they have to gain? In the incredibly rare circumstance that a woman wants a short haircut done by a barber. They want the ability to have their haircut without be discriminated against simply based on their gender. What do men have to lose? Every man and woman questioning what exactly are these men only business discussing that apparently easily offends women and making us look stereotypical sexists.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:27 PM
1

lmao I'm not the one moving goal posts. Everyone is yelling at me omg we need this men only barber but not one is saying exactly why. Have ever even see a women in a barbers? no? neither have I because its a barbers only men go there. So you are talking about making our group look stupid in public to support a issue that does not even exist.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:02 PM
1

Seriously you would prefer a system that allows business to openly discriminate? You don't support my political party? You're barred from my pub. Drunk after a night out and you come in to my take away? Nope sorry I don't serve drunks you're banned. Your car is under 2L engine? sorry this petrol stations is for proper cars only. There is even the gay baker case in the UK. A baker refused to make a gay wedding cake because they did not believe in gay marriage I think that's fair their are hundred…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:00 PM
1

Look I agree, I don't like getting my haircut by a woman, and I would prefer a male dominated environment, and honestly that is what i get without any rules being put in place because i go to a barber. I am yet to even see a girl in one so it's obviously very rare so rare that should we even care? But when I think about this from a 50/50 what is the most fair for both genders then I can't help thinking it's obvious that discriminating against giving someone a haircut because they are a woman is …
/r/MensRights17/02/20 03:54 PM
1

Because obviously I support having been only private events. Having men only hairdressers is reaching and only makes us look bad
/r/MensRights17/02/20 03:26 PM
-4

No I don't get the idea. That's a relationship issue you should discuss with your gf it's your disposable income you should be free to spend it as you see fit. And we are not talking about that we are taking about a barbers shop. You know the kinda place where we make small talk or no talk... The issue here is that it's a business and it is saying because you are a woman I will not cut your hair. Which for what ever logical reason you have is still sexist and illegal.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 02:27 PM
1

Lmao why it shouldn't be? Because of the law! Your business cannot discriminate based on gender. You want to hire an area for a private event then go ahead, you tell a woman with short hair im not going to cut your hair because you're a woman then you're breaking the law. You don't discuss anything like that are not do I so 100% of men polled have no idea why this is needed.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 02:21 PM
1

Lol I cannot know that? No one on here has said they need this or this is an issue they encounter at the barber they all just want it as a fuck you to women. Also 99% of the time barbers are men only anyway. You still haven't made any logical argument to why it needs to be men only.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 02:10 PM
-5

Because your making us look like jackasses / sexist. We don't need men only barbers we need private men only spaces where men can discuss what ever they want with each other. 1) no one says anything to their Barber they wouldn't mind a woman overhearing 2) 1 on 1 conversation with a barber is not the same as a space for a group of men to talk. This is no different to having a men only pub even though we could sit in pub and talk and no one would over hear us you would still want it men only just…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:59 PM
-6

No those are topics men should be discussing but choose not to. Until today I never realised we men talk to our barbers about women's tits and how hot X woman is. Is that your topic of conversation at the barber?
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:49 PM
-5

Ok I see what you're saying but I still don't understand. I don't understand this concept of discussing something private in a public place where a woman over hearing would be more embarrassing then a man overhearing it... I don't understand this concept of a random woman listening intently to your entire conversation, knowing you are married, knows your wife, knows her number, and texts her the negative things you have been saying about her.... I am not saying men do not need men only places I …
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:46 PM
-6

Yeah exactly not mental illness, cancer, / subjects men only feel they can only discuss with other men. Why do you care if a woman is in the background/can't even hear what you're saying while you discuss politics, sports and life????
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:23 PM
-1

Because nobody here says they do and I know no one that does.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:21 PM
-15

I agree with all of that I'm saying nobody discusses that stuff at their hairdresser or if they do they can easily do it between themselves and their hairdresser without anyone hearing. But honestly my point is there is no need for this. Hairdressers are not really the place to discuss these issues.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:08 PM
-82

Lol what exactly would you talk about in a hairdresser that can you not say in front of a woman? Edit: lots of downvotes yet no one has the balls say why this is needed. Men only groups are needed, places where issues facing men like medical conditions that only affect men can be openly discussed and everyone can relate. Or issues like children and metal health. But implementing that at a hairdresser is stupid. 1) most never talk any more than standard how are you. 2) cab any one here admit they…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 12:11 PM
1

Male privilege does not exist but It's lame to pull random people that have done zero research into the issue and then question them on something you have done hundreds of hours of research in. Sadly it's a systematic issue that has indoctrinated generations.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 05:35 PM
3

That is a difficult read, so sad.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 11:21 AM
-1

lmao what the fuck? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/eunz6r/saves_her_from_injurydeath_but_has_to_quickly_let/ffqsjl8?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x
/r/MensRights27/01/20 04:59 PM
-2

Without bitching, moaning and arguing there wouldn't be much point of Reddit :D
/r/MensRights27/01/20 04:55 PM
1

You haven't even attempted to account for the situation from his visual perspective I was the first and at the time the only one to do so. It was me that raised the point the car could of been going far faster than what we see in the video, it obviously could of slowed at seeing his reaction or her. But his actions are perfectly expected for someone seeing a car moving that fast towards someone Bad idea? You'd rather take precautions? Wrong again I specifically say "this does not mean his action…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 04:30 PM
-10

What physics and speed? the law of motion? no one object can be in two places at once? Here is a simply trick, put your mouse cursor on her and follow her, when her path is interrupted keep moving your mouse at the same speed and your mouse cursor will hit the side of the car, it didn't have enough time to get in front of it. I am not saying this does not justify his actions but I am saying we need to be honest here and not draw our own conclusions to fit our own narrative. It is far more likely…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 04:11 PM
-15

I agree, he didn't do anything wrong. Just trying to shed some light on why people are reacting they way they are.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:39 PM
-39

Let's be honest, she was not going to go flying over the bonnet. She needed to do another 3 steps. Follow her with your mouse and then continue your mouse when her movement is interrupted. If we assume she was not going to stop and look when she got to the edge of the parked car then she would of walked into the side of the car. I do not think she would of made it out in front of the car. Obviously he did not know that so his actions are justified.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:25 PM
20

How do we know how fast the car was going before what we can see here? His reactions do look a little over zealous for the speed seen but i think if he accessed the car to be going aroubd 40 mph you'd act in a similar manner. His actions could be based on a car going 40 mph which then slowed down to what we see in the video.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:16 PM
10

Powerful, sad and shocking statistic. How can we possibly share this information with the public who do not want to know about male issues.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 11:49 AM
1

I don't know the details the page is behind a paywall but because she is not currently in jail im guessing she has not been convicted. many women accuse but there is not enough evidence to convict. I'm just making the point generally let's view the evidence, we are no better than feminist if we accuse before we know the facts.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:45 PM
1

She hasn't committed a crime though?
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:24 AM
0

If we knew she had committed previous false allegations then we as the jury would be hugely influenced to ignore the facts and evidence and simply say oh she is the making it up. I don't see why the concept is so hard to understand. You are the best example, you think she is making it up and you've not even seen the evidence you prove my point.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:22 AM
1

This is for UK don't know about American law
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:19 AM
1

Didn't say I was a solicitor*, I've served in court the accused had committed over 50 previous crimes we did not find out until after we had reached a verdict on the evidence provided to us. If I knew that it would of biased my opinion and I would of voted him guilty. Perhaps in American law they don't have to do that but in the UK your not told about anything not related to the case which make sense. It's like saying the man is a Hollywood director and the woman is a waitress he must be telling…
/r/MensRights26/12/19 10:05 PM
-13

(in the UK) That's not evidence though. Evidence must relate to this case, anything not related but can influence the jury cannot be allowed. Say for example there is overwhelming evidence that this person is guilty but the jury disregard the evidence because of the actions in the accusers past. That's not justice. Trials are based on facts and evidence not on what ifs. Edit: we are all perfect examples of this, we all think she is making it up we think there is no case, yet not one of us has se…
/r/MensRights26/12/19 02:27 PM
1

This is amazing!
/r/MensRights08/11/19 02:27 PM
5

No amount of money will compensate 2 years loss of life, loss of career, family, friends. He is owed millions but even getting it wouldn't be justice.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:11 PM
2

How would you feel if you were a cop, you loved your wife and kids and I kept making jokes/sly comments in front of them about how lucky you were to arrest that women? You wouldn't find it funny then would you? It's completely inappropriate in that situation you cannot deny that and if it is wrong there then where can you say it? Do you think these offensive jokes are fine if we just say them to one another behind the backs of other people?
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:52 PM
3

I have a lot of debates going, I will reply when I can.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:47 PM
3

that wasn't me, I was away I replied now and you dv me anyway so why do you care?
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:41 PM
3

How does that matter? It's a subreddit for the discussion mens rights not a sub for jokes at mens expense, however immature you or others may be on this sub the message is always; it is unacceptable to have a double standard that normalises these issues. The woman in the video committed sexual assault and men especially in this sub should demonise those actions not write them off as a joke. Its not the joke itself for me its the fact that people think its acceptable to make the joke at the victi…
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:35 PM
4

So you see no harm in a male rubbing his crotch against a female officer? that's funny to you? Also if you don't know the context then that is even more reason not to comment.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 02:44 PM
4

You have perfectly demonstrated why the above picture is an issue for men. The fact that you and the person in the image (and society) thinks it is acceptable to say that stuff is the issue.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 01:15 PM
7

I cannot see how any sane person would not favour merit. If you want more women in the police then go to schools and put the time in educating and persuading girls to take that career path. Don't be lazy and just create a quota system that takes people that never wanted to do something and are not qualified to do it and put them in that position.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 08:13 AM
1

Ok no problem. You can't change titles btw.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 01:45 PM
1

How is that an unpopular opinion in a men's rights subreddit? It's literally what we all want/support/campaign for.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 07:17 AM
6

Good spot, I didn't read the articles just scanned PG financial news. In fact if you search Gillette instead there are a number of stories: - Procter & Gamble writes down Gillette business but remains confident in its future - CNBC - P&G's Gillette razor business is not for sale even after $8 billion write-down - Yahoo
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:29 PM
3

Sorry to be the bad news dude and While i dislike the ad there is nothing out there that says P&G have taken any sort of write down, in fact after 1 minute of research I found every news source states the opposite.... - FT - PG sales rise most in 13 years - https://www.ft.com/content/33455430-b210-11e9-bec9-fdcab53d6959 - Forbes - PG surging could this indicate a recession? -https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelcannivet/2019/07/31/consumer-staples-like-pg-are-surging-does-that-foreshadow-recessio…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:03 AM
4

what's that?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:45 AM
3

Looks like he is keen for it (smiling at her) and before she even kisses him he is already leaning over to kiss her... I dno this is a bit of a reach.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:53 AM
-4

Reaching a bit there... It's a kids movie not a battle of the sexes.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 10:34 AM
12

Discriminate against 50% of your customers then shocked when you don't get enough business and have to close.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:21 PM
1

Shakespeare responds to Gillette: https://youtu.be/KcbMHhv8rdM?t=243 ​
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:00 PM
1

It's a game with no historical accuracy. A game. No one in the game is killed outright, you can be blown up by a tank yet you stay in one piece and get a 10 second window where someone can run up to you and stab you a needle and you magically come back to life. If you play as support you get infinite ammo. If you play as a medic you get infinite medic pacts. So you're happy with all these magical abilities and more in the game but you not happy with the ability to play as a woman even though the…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:50 PM
1

"there's literally no reason to put women in the game" There is literally no reason to not give the option to play as a female character... Women played no role in WW2 is bullshit, did women experience the horrors of ww2? yes of course they did, were they taken advantage of by both sides? Yes, in most cases violently. Women served, women did unspeakable things to ensure they and their children survived and women died. Just because your backwards society didn't let women take part doesn't mean ot…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 01:27 AM
6

Oh please... If you are generally interested in gaming then you wouldn't give a crap. To say any game is completely historically accurate is bullcrap. Standard game: Me setting up a spawn beacon and constantly dieing and then respawning in same place while the kids on my team are crying because they didn't get a turn in the tank/plane. Yep that's how it went down in ww2. I think I speak for allot of bf5 players when I say we would rather play as a transvestite dwarf if it meant all the bugs in t…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 10:54 AM
136

That is just disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 03:51 PM
2

Something must be done!!
/r/MensRights08/02/18 08:25 PM
5

No real loss considering how incompetent they are. How many other innocents would be arrested if they were on the loose?
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:12 PM
5

Thousands of current rape and serious sexual assault cases in England and Wales are to be reviewed to ensure evidence has been disclosed. The Met said it has drafted in 120 officers to review 600 rape and sexual assault cases where a suspect has been charged to identify any similar problems.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:04 PM
4

The logic behind the current system goes against all common sense. Every person in the UK should have a right to a fair trial. Publicly convicting someone of rape before trial means stripping them of their job, their family and their friends. The current system is infuriating and illogical.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 06:26 PM
9

Female* police officers who think for some bizarre reason they can comment said: 'Oh my husband is circumcised, I think it's better'. Or 'Oh they are tougher than they look, it will toughen him up'.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:56 AM
77

"It's even illegal to dock dogs' tails. I've come home crying my eyes out thinking a dog has got more rights than my child." So sad... 4 years for justice ffs and the police just brushing off by saying "oh its better that way" fucking disgraceful
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:48 AM
3

Judge Pringle was told Woodward had become addicted to drugs and had previously been in an abusive relationship with a previous boyfriend. Yeah and now she is abusing another boyfriend in a new relationship
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:19 PM
2

Unbelievable. Disgusting. Picture this, her boyfriend drunk and on drugs, threw a laptop, glass, and jam jar at her, then lunged at her with a bread knife stabbing her in the leg. He would be vilified locked up and forgotten about.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:16 PM
81

18,000 votes nice, but that is from the ladbible not sure how many women have voted
/r/MensRights19/04/17 03:11 PM
1

Yeah i agree any one thing fits the time but to do all three repeatedly to members of the public and then for police to arrive and for her to do it all to them too. Its like 3 different crimes done to 2 sets of people making it 6 crimes. Then you need to take into account the second set were police officers which carries even higher punishment. My opinion is if it were a man who did this he would get a worse punishment...
/r/MensRights14/03/17 08:17 PM
3

Assaulting several members of the public, assaulting several police officers, spitting at a police officer, and a barrage of racist insults aimed at police and others. Prison should be for removing threats to the public this is a massive threat to the public. If it was a man he would go to jail. Men can face prison time for any one of those things so for her to get off on all three is just bizarre.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 07:50 PM
3

Assaulting several members of the public, assaulting several police officers, spitting at a police officer, and a barrage of racist insults aimed at police and others. This is still on the streets. If this was a man he would be in jail.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 07:48 PM
3

That's not the point. It does not remove a racist capable of assaulting anyone that tries to stop them. Best option is prison, remove the threat from society and try get them to feel remorse
/r/MensRights14/03/17 07:34 PM
1

IT'S HAPPENING
/r/TheRedPill25/04/16 10:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter