TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tiredfromlife2019 Archive

View 21 posts and 2,442 comments by tiredfromlife2019 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
432

Social Issuestiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:12 PM
267

Social Issuestiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights26/09/21 06:41 AM
131

Marriage/Childrentiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights10/01/24 11:34 PM
121

Feminismtiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights29/06/24 07:46 AM
110

tiredfromlife2019/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/20 07:32 PM
61

Generaltiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:25 AM
57

Feminismtiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights21/01/23 10:47 PM
45

Social Issuestiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights20/04/23 09:05 PM
42

Generaltiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights25/05/23 01:41 AM
40

Feminismtiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:31 PM
38

social issuestiredfromlife2019/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 05:27 AM
24

tiredfromlife2019/r/AntiFeminists05/09/20 01:36 AM
23

Social Issuestiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights05/09/20 12:05 AM
13

tiredfromlife2019/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/20 04:22 PM
5

sexualitytiredfromlife2019/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/21 07:47 AM
3

discussiontiredfromlife2019/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/22 03:37 AM
1

Humourtiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:22 AM
1

social issuestiredfromlife2019/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 05:19 AM
1

Social Issuestiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights05/10/21 05:13 AM
1

Generaltiredfromlife2019/r/MensRights27/01/23 03:17 PM
0

tiredfromlife2019/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/20 07:56 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,442 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Make it open or divorce though it seems like any new relationship would just be a repeat
/r/MensRights19/07/26 06:13 PM
1

Shrug I didnt watch it purely cause it's capeshit. I don't care about superheroes. Didn't watch the mcu either
/r/MensRights17/07/26 11:53 PM
1

Still, box office analysts on Sunday noted an uncomfortable truth: Female-led superhero movies have been rejected almost uniformly over the past five years or so, perhaps reflecting a resurgent misogyny among the core fan base, which is largely male. Before its release, “Supergirl” became caught up in a now-familiar cycle of online abuse, with some fanboys attacking Milly Alcock’s casting and appearance. Warner Bros. executives said they were surprised by both the ferocity of the backlash and it…
/r/MensRights17/07/26 11:19 PM
2

Again going by logic of blaming men for not watching the movie which is not supporting women, then yes women didn't support women but you brought this up.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 02:19 PM
2

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/movies/articles/supergirl-fans-blame-men-movie-062700585.html It says right here that supergirl fans blame men. You can pretend all you like, you can imagine whatever you like, I don't care. Post the quote showing the OP saying what you claim they said. Everything else is BS
/r/MensRights17/07/26 02:15 PM
4

You are imagining a lot of things that didnt come from the post at all. He said this amount of women watched it but there are so many more who didn't and more men watched the movie then women but people blame men for the movie failing when they should really be asking why don't more women see it instead of blaming men. Men can watch it or not watch it, its upto them and they shouldn't be shamed for it. The above is what he said Supergirl fans blame men for misogyny for not watching the movie. If…
/r/MensRights17/07/26 11:28 AM
3

The opening post obviously. Show me where he said anything of what you said.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 11:12 AM
18

Where was this in his quote? Go on quote him. He said why are men shamed for not watching supergirl and we should not be shamed as its our right to not watch things.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 02:56 AM
23

As I said, men will always be blamed. Just bask in it and laugh in their faces
/r/MensRights17/07/26 12:58 AM
27

Nice on missing the point. The OP wasn't saying women lead movies dont get money or women directed movies are bad. Thats your imagination. They said why are men blamed for not watching supergirl
/r/MensRights17/07/26 12:56 AM
64

Yes, men are blamed cause its just not done to shame women as that implies you are trying to impose some sort of obligation or consequence on women which is verboten. Women's choice is sacroscant unless it contradicts other things higher on the oppression hierarchy but otherwise womens choice is the most important thing in existence and we will kill hundreds of thousands for this. What the media want is men pay for these movies even if these movies suck and aren't made to entertain men, doesn't …
/r/MensRights17/07/26 12:14 AM
2

You guys need to understand words are weapons by elites and the left. They say words you understand as one thing but they understand as another.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 10:56 PM
17

They are also in safe countries after they leave the warzone but leave anyway for places like the UK cause benefits. So either way it doesn't matter
/r/MensRights15/07/26 06:32 PM
65

Cause those are luxury beliefs and only really meant for certain groups like migrants and women. White men or men not liked by society? Go die for the state and get nothing in return. Oh wait, women will swipe left on you or divorce you. Source here, cause I know someone will say muh incel not that I care but best to get to the point then waste time with trivialities such as I have no idea what you're talking about: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/25/world/europe/ukraine-war-divorce.html and htt…
/r/MensRights15/07/26 04:53 PM
5

I haven't said anything stupid. You just don't like it and thats not my problem. Be angry as you like or not. I was just saying its interesting you dont have anything but hurty words
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:16 PM
5

Its nice how you have nothing to say at all but insults, really proves you have nothing of worth to say
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:14 PM
5

Oh its for women rising up no doubt but not equality. Its for women's supremacy. Thats just human nature and feel however you like. I will still say what I say
/r/MensRights15/07/26 11:49 AM
14

It was never abour equality.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:07 AM
9

They don't have kids though otherwise the birthrate wouldn't be abysmal
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:07 AM
14

Yes. The whole fat is beautiful or beautiful at every size is for women only. Why do you think it died when ozempic came onto the scene?
/r/MensRights15/07/26 02:43 AM
7

Indeed.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 05:07 AM
30

He knew his life was over. The trial even if it went his way is irrelevant as society will ostracise him cause what about my daughter. Just like how fathers of daughters want people to support the supergirl movie with their money so that their kid can have a role model of how to be a girlboss
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:47 AM
6

Society already thinks certain men are subhuman, just play a video game and see what they think of you
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:32 AM
53

Women are wonderful and all that matters. Why does this surprise you? Look at reddit and what they say, it may be the most exaggerated but frankly they are merely saying what people think subconsciously
/r/MensRights13/07/26 06:14 PM
6

Feminists don't care cause that is the goal. I explain here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/CdInXOK0ye
/r/MensRights11/07/26 02:42 PM
3

The chutzpah part is cause you were apparently trying to reply to me without replying to me and I replied to you only for you to delete the comment and then post another comment that I didn't see until I decided to read the entire thread. Basically I thought you were playing games with me. My bad for responding aggressively, Though 22 hours later, damn.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 01:04 PM
1

Fair enough then. I thought you were a guy.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 08:08 AM
4

I like how you schizo out at me about using a word instead of talking about my argument when all I meant by that term is not the stereotype of a nerd or gamer. Everyone knows what you mean by Chad. Shortform
/r/MensRights07/07/26 05:20 PM
6

I responded but then you deleted your post only to repost here and claim you can't see my post. The chutzpah
/r/MensRights07/07/26 03:07 PM
6

I'm well aware thats what Im pointing out, its not about some bs morality. Its just shitting on men for being men that aren't chad. They will say oh the gamers are dangerous while ignoring grooming gangs in the UK for example cause they aren't gamers.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 02:53 PM
1

We know the answer. Here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/GBVpDTJGgM Or the healthy and beautiful at every size which is just women, not men and stopped when ozempic came onto the scene
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:44 PM
1

Exactly, society doesn't care about things aimed at women, thats my point. You could have books with female gaze cover in a bookstore and its aok but don't you dare have a video game with a male gaze cover. Or the healthy at every size bs that was only for women, nor for men and dropped when ozempic came onto the scene
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:41 PM
2

In gaming, they consider male gamers losers and filth, they don't really care if they have addiction or not, its just OK to punch down on them.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:34 PM
0

Ok, my argument is not pro porn. Its discussing why the shaming is done at men and only men. I already explained my position, ban women porn alongside men porn. Otherwise you don't give a shit about porn, its just to shit on men
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:33 PM
1

Its in gaming where they frequently call male gamers manchildren or losers who will die alone. They always go, go watch porn. And you are making my point, the addiction only matters for society, the point is disgust for the individual.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:30 PM
0

Just to be clear, you can get rid of porn, I just want women to lose their porn too.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:28 PM
0

The attacks are about manchild or being virginity or neckbeard or similar words, I could go on. The addiction argument is about society itself aka not the one being shamed
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:26 PM
8

https://www.reddit.com/r/RomanceBooks/s/BXspll6Fd3 Or how about 50 shades of grey or how abour twilight or how abour the gacha game love and deep space and here is a link about it: https://youtu.be/bDANTCuT908?si=I9hfTwOgWgv4TwCb Recent controversy is chinese women demanding devs say its a game for women and women only
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:23 PM
4

Actually look at what is said, its attacking the men as losers nothing about addiction as that argument is about society and protecting the good men and children, doesn't matter even if the porn has no real life women in it, its attacked even if no actual sex happens as shown by the le male gaze argument.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:22 PM
4

True. No problem.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 11:00 AM
5

I believe we were basically done but then you said that I needed to stop being weak so I responded
/r/MensRights07/07/26 10:44 AM
5

I never said it bothered me. I tell such people to go fuck themselves. My comments are answering the question. But society is society and wil force things there way come hell or highwater and no muh pull yourself by your bootstrap bs will stop that. Like your position requires societal power to get it to work as well. Come on
/r/MensRights07/07/26 10:40 AM
8

Fair enough then. But your position is fringe as in get rid of both for both sexes. As my other comments have shown, only men are shamed and attacked even for video games with no porn at all.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 10:34 AM
4

So if I'm understanding you correctly, you also want to ban women porn, is that correct?
/r/MensRights07/07/26 10:30 AM
10

The question is about why men are shamed using porn. Women also use porn and do only fans and there is romantasy which are bodice rippers or the ever bigger dildos but no discussion about getting rid of that.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 10:14 AM
3

I was never blaming women in my posts though. We are saying the same thing, society. Women do play a part but thats a separate discussion.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 09:44 AM
13

But you don't advocate that for women I'm sure. Cause you don't address that at all ignoring what the OP is actually asking
/r/MensRights07/07/26 09:35 AM
19

Women can game but no one in government or media shits on them or calls them on the verge of violent, gacha games aimed at women that are gooner is not commented on but male ones will lead to rape even though the uk groomng gangs I'm sure not a single one played such things but who cares. Women can be anti-social and nobody cares. Its about the men, thats the issue Infact, gaming wants to replace straight male gamers with women and lgbtq cause women and lgbtq bring respectability to something wh…
/r/MensRights07/07/26 09:14 AM
63

Nobody cares about women using porn, romantasy are bodice rippers but no issue. Its the same thing with video games, why do people dislike it and see it as making people violent? Cause loser males play video games. If video games was purely women playing, no censorship or hand wringing about video games would exist
/r/MensRights07/07/26 08:43 AM
6

Nobody cares, romantasy are bodice rippers but no issue. Its the same thing with video games, why do people dislike it and see it as making people violent? Cause loser males play video games. If video games was purely women playing, no censorship or hand wringing about video games would exist
/r/MensRights07/07/26 08:28 AM
19

IKR, how people miss the hypocrisy I don't understand, though men seem to know it instinctively as there was no such push by fat men
/r/MensRights05/07/26 06:43 AM
161

Look, the no bodyshaming is for women only. It was never aimed at men. You need to stop believing in this equality bs the feminist push at you. They don't intend equality but they say they do to make you gullible but everything will be for women
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:15 AM
4

I was doing the stay at home father exclusively stays at home idea cause the gamer took care of the working part. But yeah, even earn less money is bad in their eyes
/r/MensRights02/07/26 08:40 PM
15

Of course. What many need to realise is people say a lot of shit they don't mean or they say shit that sounds like one thing to you but means something else to them as they sre using good words to hide what they really intend to do. Basically they never wanted stay at home father's, they hate men gaming after work, what makes you think they will tolerate a man who doesn't earn money?
/r/MensRights02/07/26 05:29 PM
1

Correct. And yet they won't do anything to help men step up and actively make stepping up harder by giving women the jobs. So yeah, I don't care, let them rot I say
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:24 AM
1

Thats exactly what is happening
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:00 AM
3

I literally said establishment here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/jkonLX7nQX Hassan has been interviewed by journos last I check. And they go on and on about muh evil capitalism like a broken record and whats beyond it is communism. I don't mind the evil capitalism talk cause as I said I despise the corporations but it does get tiresome especially when they at same time protect muh corporations from the audience As for your term, OK thanks for clarifying as I was a bit confused cause yo…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:15 AM
20

People know why the birthrate is down https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Zlp50Bekut We just pretend its about money
/r/MensRights28/06/26 08:54 PM
4

Lol, I hate the corporations. Who do you think establishment are I'm taking about? I'm not rich either. The journos are like hassan or want to be hassan. And what millionaire would spend time on reddit?
/r/MensRights28/06/26 08:49 PM
3

Speaking truth to power by journos is bs propaganda that journos love and spread cause it gives them carte blanche to say listen to me, believe I'm the best and ensure I get wealthy. Journos are walking alongside the establishment cause thats where the good boys or good girls praise and money comes from while constantly punching down on people for the establishment. So yeah, scum
/r/MensRights28/06/26 07:21 PM
26

The man is likely thinking he is going to be rejected anyway, so why bother
/r/MensRights28/06/26 07:14 PM
2

They will always default to the economics argument cause they wish to hide the real reason plus since all journos scum are communists anyway, its perfect opportunity to bitch about capitalism again
/r/MensRights28/06/26 07:06 PM
2

Sorry for late reply. Had work right after my reply. Fair enough on your point about my defeatism. Am just very cynical. But I am agreeing with you about this data being important hence why I mentioned save it
/r/MensRights28/06/26 06:56 AM
4

The issue is that the establishment will just ignore it, people will go muh anecdotes so its not true, losers and others go you deserve it. Its good as a fuck you to "source?" cretins. We should save it, I'm just saying don't expect any changes anytime soon from this
/r/MensRights27/06/26 08:37 PM
1

Isn't it amazing how people will flat out admit educate women to destroy the birthrate but then say men are at fault for why birthrate is low or women don't have more money is why birthrate is low? It's like they just blank out the truth they already know and gaslighted themselves and others
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:01 PM
19

Exactly. Equality is the trojan horse for supremacy
/r/MensRights27/06/26 02:50 PM
37

And incel Don't forget that one.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 02:16 PM
50

Won't change anything, people will still assume otherwise
/r/MensRights27/06/26 01:58 PM
8

50 shades of grey male lead is hot and rich
/r/MensRights27/06/26 06:18 AM
3

I talk about feminism here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/jj68RXOasH The journoshits are being accurate, that is women empowerment actually is
/r/MensRights25/06/26 02:38 AM
3

The AI is not a person, its being told what to do which is prioritise women
/r/MensRights20/06/26 01:48 PM
1

The fundamental issue is human nature creates bias and hunger for more and more power. Institutions as seen aren't neutral despite them supposed to be cause that's how human nature rolls
/r/MensRights18/06/26 07:09 PM
2

"When I am weaker than you I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles." From Frank Herbert dune My own bigger elaboration on this: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/n2XadVX6xK I elaborate that equality is impossible cause of human nature lust for vengeance
/r/MensRights08/06/26 12:42 AM
5

"When I am weaker than you I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles." From Frank Herbert dune My own bigger elaboration on this: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/n2XadVX6xK
/r/MensRights08/06/26 12:04 AM
1

So you have no position other than saying I can't say anything cause its not happening right now. Nope. I will say it and stand by what I said in my original post and you can fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 02:00 PM
2

Men do get drafted to war if it happens as seen with Ukraine. You clearly don't have a point but wish to be pedantic to me. You are saying what I'm saying but making a big deal about it of how dare I say it when the OP women are saying it not me
/r/MensRights07/06/26 01:58 PM
1

Did I ever claim to be Ukrainian? You seem to be ignoring the subreddit title which is men's rights. Not specific men of a specific nation. Nevermind arguing about conscription was not my main point but that the feminist point is full own bullshit cause they will do nothing
/r/MensRights07/06/26 01:56 PM
7

Ukraine. Not everyone is American. Nevermind I'm addressing the we have our children argument which is bullshit cause they don't have kids and even if a war happened they won't have kids so screwed either way
/r/MensRights07/06/26 01:35 PM
11

"When I am weaker than you I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles." From Frank Herbert dune My own bigger elaboration on this: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/n2XadVX6xK
/r/MensRights07/06/26 07:36 AM
17

BTW, women aren't giving birth cause the birth rate is going down so their arguments are bullshit anyway
/r/MensRights07/06/26 07:17 AM
14

Well yeah, they are created by corporations that are all part of mainstream consensus. It's to be expected
/r/MensRights02/06/26 06:56 AM
31

Basically yeah, both sides fundamentally don't care about men. Both are pull yourself by your bootstraps or just die
/r/MensRights29/05/26 11:21 AM
1

"When I am weaker than you I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles." From Frank Herbert dune My own bigger elaboration on this: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/n2XadVX6xK
/r/MensRights26/05/26 11:42 PM
18

So what? So is rape, what's your point?
/r/MensRights19/05/26 04:06 PM
23

An accelerationist I see.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 03:07 PM
4

So you just wished to be pedantic then even as you said oh yeah just be tall man as if that's easy but then said before oh yeah looks don't matter, like come on
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:53 PM
7

I really don't care about female relationships. I just want them out of gaming. What I do know is women only like a small number of men online and will let attractive men get away with shit they would never allow for other men and that all the whining about approaches is about unattractive men. Simple as that. Whether you call it confidence or looks is irrelevant. And taller is a point for me not for you so you are saying I'm right. At this point, why even ask your question if you know so much c…
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:48 PM
7

Nope, physical attraction matters. Aside from that, you are saying a lot of things that I have already said in more simple terms.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:42 PM
6

No it makes perfect sense again, you have to be attractive and don't be unattractive and that's it approaching is good. It's bad if it's done by anyone else and if done for videos as women see it as them being duped
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:36 PM
22

Be attractive Don't be unattractive As for the op cold approaching, they are doing it for a video and don't hide the womens face so that's presumably why they go unsafe blah blah
/r/MensRights08/05/26 01:51 PM
56

It's just the socially acceptable way to say subhuman male
/r/MensRights08/05/26 01:02 PM
3

It's a step forward to cause female freedom and more money is given to women. That's the logic
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:36 PM
5

It's in the paper, they say countries have tried the money and it hasn't worked. And poor countries that are warzones have high birthrates like somalia, when your country get rich the countried birthrate plummets. Your answer is just give more money without any proof it will work besides women saying so. And the idea you seem to be saying is let's give women elite money, how are we going to do that considering the number of women and elite money can't cover them all. I have precedent on my side.…
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:36 PM
4

artificial wombs are cope they are spewing to pretend they give a shit about men. They will either never exist cause feminism will shut it down or will be under women control cause men evil and pdf and all political sides will support this. It's cope
/r/MensRights27/04/26 03:25 PM
6

Btw, for those who are reading the paper, artificial wombs are cope they are spewing to pretend they give a shit about men. They will either never exist cause feminism will shut it down or will be under women control cause men evil and pdf and all political sides will support this. It's cope
/r/MensRights27/04/26 03:23 PM
2

It's known that poor people have lots of kids man, their birth rate is high and their country's have war happening. The west and east Asia dont have that issue and yet birth rate is dropping. Look at the link in the OP, it mentions money payments have been tried and haven't worked. Nevermind, they are already discussing your idea of give women more money to further marginalize men to hopefully pull up the birthrates. I have precedent on my side that poverty or hellholes compared to the west have…
/r/MensRights27/04/26 03:04 PM
7

Never. Men exist to work for the state.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 12:17 PM
8

Cause society is going along with it? Have you not seen how everything is gynocentric? Even so called conservatives are madam, do what you want the men need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps harder
/r/MensRights27/04/26 12:16 PM
28

Well yeah cause they will not be doing it so their hands are clean, you will do it and suffer the consequences
/r/MensRights27/04/26 12:05 PM
3

Causing issues for societies said migrants go to leading to radicalization of politics and doesn't solve anything cause places most of these migrants come from are getting western messages poured into their governments to become like the west aka cause birthrates to go down
/r/MensRights27/04/26 12:01 PM
7

More money for women will not fix anything as poverty countries have higher birthrates then wealthy countries. They marginalize men cause the opposite is unthinkable even though organizations have it on record that female education devastates birthrates
/r/MensRights27/04/26 12:00 PM
3

They marginalize men cause the opposite is unthinkable to them. Organizations have it recorded that female education is devastating to birthrates but they instead say marginalize men further
/r/MensRights27/04/26 11:58 AM
6

how dare the creeps not approach women so we can call them creeps and reject them and laugh at rejecting them
/r/MensRights24/04/26 10:05 AM
11

Nope, they won't care. The state will take care of them plus the men they want Chad will obviously not give up.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 11:33 AM
2

Of course it's unsustainable just like the birth rate is unsustainable but there is no solution cause gynocentricism
/r/MensRights20/04/26 10:51 AM
4

Bad news, it will never be enough so more changes will happen
/r/MensRights20/04/26 10:49 AM
3

And yet governments give money and taxes to people and they still have no kids with them saying cause they prefer to live their life or be free as they say on news reports. And yet poor people have the most kids. It's not a money issue. Hell the world bank says education is a factor and seeing as education leads to women getting money and yet birthrate goes down regardless
/r/MensRights19/04/26 03:36 PM
0

This proves my point, not against it. Never mind government have tried incentives and it hasn't worked. And the world bank basically says that women's education lowers the birthrate but then tries to hide it with muh family planning
/r/MensRights19/04/26 03:14 PM
5

Countries that have higher birth rates tend to be poor countries so it's not money no matter how many times people say it. Plus education for women is well known to push down birth rates. At any rate there is no solution
/r/MensRights19/04/26 01:59 PM
3

Countries that are in poverty have higher birth rates. It's not money. There is no solution to the birth rate crisis
/r/MensRights19/04/26 01:57 PM
7

It is. That's what you're seeing in action. It's either an asshole who believes all this cause of indoctrination of saying it to get good boy points so he can say to women he is a good man and please have sex with him.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 10:38 AM
25

Cause that's cheating, society is eugenic no matter what it says publicly. A man learning PUA or getting surgeries and getting women cause of thaf is Haram cause he is cheating his destiny of being removed from the genepool by tricking women
/r/MensRights16/04/26 12:18 PM
32

Bad news, there are no non-gynocentric political parties.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 12:16 PM
1

Cause people are eugenic even if they pretend otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:29 AM
6

Yes, gamers are hated for example
/r/MensRights16/04/26 12:34 AM
41

Incel is just the socially acceptable word for subhuman. Don't give a fuck about their word games.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 12:33 AM
12

woman take responsibility for their actions The issue for society plus divorce would go even higher
/r/MensRights15/04/26 11:56 AM
3

Mate, stop caring about the muh misogyny crap. You are crippling yourself by caring about it
/r/MensRights15/04/26 03:30 AM
37

France said no cause it will destabilize the family or some such. There's your answer
/r/MensRights15/04/26 03:23 AM
2

Correct. Hell, what's cool and not cool is determined by whether women think it's loser shit or not
/r/MensRights11/04/26 11:02 PM
2

It's just society and women blaming men for problems that come from women. Everyone deep down knows women are why the birth rate is imploding but no one wants to face up to that truth so they will blame anything and everything to hide the truth.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 03:30 PM
1

This makes me so angry. Why on earth is an organisation purportedly pro-social justice continuing to frame the man's role as a breadwinner, and entrenching sexist notions? Cause women still want this, they say they want to be equal with men in pay but then they want men who earn more then them as partners. This of course is insane as if every man and woman earned the same money, where would the men with more money come from?
/r/MensRights19/03/26 12:43 AM
0

Women would have fewer kids regardless as that's feminism and freedom for you.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 12:04 AM
1

This is a link showing the IGN comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/s/UMWimKjywW
/r/MensRights18/06/25 11:48 AM
10

This gigantic comment of mine is about video games but it explores this issue in media that I post on another subreddit about video games. That's because they don't have a problem with scantily clad women. What they hate is the sexuality of men that are, or that they believe to be, unattractive. They see good looking women in video games and think it's for unattractive men. That makes them aware that unattractive men exist, which they hate. The reason they don't walk around furious in a world wh…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 11:48 AM
7

The ancients had plenty of time outside of labor to observe people being people as they didn't have the distraction of media or social media. Check this out: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assemblywomen
/r/MensRights17/06/25 06:33 PM
68

Society doesn't care about men. Society exists to extract work/labor and resources from men for the sake of women and children. In war, society will throw millions of men to their deaths and all it care about is women and children. Men being lonely is just women following biology without constraint as explained here: https://www.reddit.com/r/redscarepod/s/LgkCugvfTs It only matters if it affects women but if it doesn't, than all is right with the world. Yes, society is eugenic even if they try a…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 01:39 PM
30

But when man does it he becomes nothing more as a problem. Cause it means that he is a weak man and people are disgusted with weak men as seen with women getting the ick. It all goes back to men are not human beings. They are human doings. Women and children are human beings.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 12:28 PM
48

Simple. It's a shit test and virtue signal.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 11:40 AM
117

Opening up emotionally as said by society is a shit test and a virtue signal. Don't do it. If you have to do it to release emotions, do it by yourself in private or tell it to trusted male friends. But never to women especially wife or gf.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 10:13 AM
7

Cause you're a man. See, as a man you're supposed to rise up in the world and prove yourself. If you can't, you're defective and thus cast into the dustbin. As a man, you're a human doing. Not a human being. Human being are women and children. Men are human doing.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:36 AM
1

Well yes. As has already been said, a man is a human doing. Not a human being.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 07:00 AM
127

Don't be upset by this. This is just formalization of what we already know to be true but people kept playing games saying it's not true. When said people try and gaslight you, point to this as evidence. Tinder is just making it easier for women to do what they already do.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 10:58 AM
8

Everyone knows that you're telling the truth. You just are not supposed to say it. Saying the truth is verboten. You're supposed to just repeat the feminism and blue pill crap.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:54 PM
3

Yes. I need to elaborate on this Quoting myself You have to understand that these people don't use words the way you or I use them. They use words to obfuscate what they really mean. They don't want diversity. They just want a specific situation to exist and for it to exist, they need to push for it but need to hide what they really want so they say that what they want is diversity but they don't really want diversity. They want supremacy. Tribalism never ever went away. It just hid itself bette…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:45 AM
2

This is just formalization of what we already know to be true but people kept playing games saying it's not true.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 07:42 AM
133

Oh and bro, if a war does happen and you're injured, women will swipe left on you cause they don't want to deal with your issues from the war. Now this is fine if the women for example from ukraine didn't also say they won't date or fuck men who escaped conscription. Damned either way.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 10:03 AM
37

Here is an example of what I'm talking about: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Qb0icSoSn0
/r/MensRights30/05/25 09:34 AM
68

Yes. It happened during WW2. An entire term got coined for it called dear John letter.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 09:29 AM
4

Don't care. I never followed these people. My main beef with feminism has always been about women invading video games and comics and trying to change it to take it away from the fans who were there cause le toxic male nerds. It's from there that my anti-feminism expanded to other topics.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 05:38 PM
25

Adding to my comment above with the below: Spain - PSOE and Podemos agree to "break" the quotas of the Parity Law: women may be more than 60% but men will not - Equality is a lie https://archive.is/GEkK2 The PSOE has agreed with Podemos to "break" the minimum quota of men required in the Parity Law so that women can occupy more than 60% of the positions in public bodies or in the management of listed companies in the private sector. This agreement, which has been given via a transactional amendm…
/r/MensRights26/05/25 12:59 AM
54

Where have you been? This is liberalism now and has been for long time. Have you forgotten quotas?
/r/MensRights26/05/25 12:47 AM
13

Correct. It's why I believe that equality is impossible as I talk about here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/L0KFmuxdnW And this comment of mine: Cause it makes her feel powerful, desired and better than other women cause a man dares societal disapproval to cat call her but she is so powerful that she can tear him down and suffer no consequences. The problem you face is you think this comes from logic. A lot of our issues come from primal instincts and human nature that are incompatible w…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 11:36 PM
11

Even NGOs and government in the West know. They just refuse to confront the problem and instead blame men.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 08:43 PM
46

Women: “I will only date a man who has a better job than me and makes more money!” Also women: “It’s systemically sexist if men have the better jobs and make more money!” The results are in: Feminism does not work, unless you’re trying to completely dismantle a society. Exactly. This contradiction cannot be fixed as jobs are finite and going to be even more finite with AI about to really get off the ground. Maybe it would be possible if people were willing to put constraints on women like how th…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 04:07 PM
1

I see. We shall see then in long term if it changes anything. I doubt it cause the women will likely just travel to get an abortion.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 01:47 AM
34

They do this shit because they can. It's as simple as that.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 12:46 AM
2

By it didn't work in Poland you mean banning abortion didn't work in Poland?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 12:19 AM
4

Really? That's interesting. I will take a look as I know that banning abortion did lead to bigger birthrates but not tax on childlessness.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:18 PM
3

Yeah I know. Hence why I said family as in married couple with kids will get money. That's why I considered it interesting as maybe it will lead to something. I just have doubts cause rome couldn't reverse it.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 08:35 PM
28

This will not work. It was tried with the roman empire and went nowhere. Family getting more money is good but I doubt it will lead to more kids.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 07:24 PM
2

It's instinct. Shrug. We've all heard of it. A man they demand he goes through so much effort just to get to sleep with her but another man she will sleep with him with him having to do barely anything.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 01:31 AM
5

The theft is the point. It's called dual mating strategy. Look it up Summary is the type of man a woman sexually desires is not guaranteed to be a good father or provider. Very much not. So get the genes from the bad boy but have the average man take care of the child. It's why the push for don't be jealous and accept if your wife cheats and forgive her. Or the push of open relationships. All an open relationship is is a woman now being able to dispense with having to pretend to be loyal to her …
/r/MensRights12/05/25 08:22 PM
4

Cause here is the thing, for a woman her kid has her DNA no matter what. So it's not in her best interest for the father to know. Just that the man she calls father is around to do the male jobs she needs from him. It's instinct. And the she wouldn't care if it happened to her I very much doubt.
/r/MensRights12/05/25 06:32 PM
4

And yet you had to throw a tantrum about it. Instead of just not caring seeing as you claim it doesn't matter and open to say. You throw the classic how dare you even.
/r/MensRights12/05/25 05:53 AM
8

Have you seen the fatphobia shit? That entire movement is about fat women. Nobody cares about fat men and to be frank good cause that entire movement is dogshit. But it's very obvious that it's for fat women and forcing people to think them healthy and beautiful and these same women don't want fat men so they want hot men but can stay as they are and society has to think them healthy and beautiful but men must become ripped. Or how about men should lower their standards The only one regurgitatin…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 05:49 AM
1

And? Did I say otherwise? This is not a gotcha. Sure they did, it was still majority men.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 08:33 PM
1

I agree. I wasn't agreeing with that act. Just answering your question.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 11:16 AM
4

To a lot of people? Yes. It's a man being weak and people dislike weak men and weak men are a target you can attack and scapegoat and nobody cares. Throw away the nonsense that liberals say punch down bad. Everyone punches down cause it helps them feel above that person in the hierarchy that is society and life.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 09:08 PM
0

You're welcome. But as I've said, you can screaming muh misogyny, it changes nothing.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 04:19 PM
1

Where did you provide an answer? I replied to a comment asking where this came from which is human nature or specifically the female side of human nature. You then brought up science which I take you as you believing that science can one day explain human nature and why it is the way it is. This is not an answer but a speculation. Sorry, I'm confused.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 09:57 PM
1

Ok. So what? Are you asking what genes made this woman feel this way? Is that what you're asking?
/r/MensRights07/05/25 09:50 PM
1

I've already explained it to you. It's easily explained. The problem is that it doesn't come from logic. It comes from human nature.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 09:41 PM
1

This correct and accurate. Screaming muh misogyny changes nothing.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 09:15 PM
9

Cause it makes her feel powerful, desired and better than other women cause a man dares societal disapproval to cat call her but she is so powerful that she can tear him down and suffer no consequences. The problem you face is you think this comes from logic. A lot of our issues come from primal instincts and human nature that are incompatible with society and morality.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 09:14 PM
2

Thank you for the correction. I thought it was chimps but the idea remains as you've said.
/r/MensRights26/04/25 07:18 PM
5

Chimps I think were taught the concept of money. They instituted prostitution. You might as well argue against reality itself.
/r/MensRights26/04/25 04:26 PM
36

Cause the point is not what they claim it is. The point is to take over a male space. I have a theory for you. You know how feminism constantly harps on the heroes journey? Personally, I also put the disdain feminism has for the heroes journey as it being a man becomes great. They don't like that. A man should already be great. if you had to put in the work to be great means you cheated nature or to put it another way, they don't want to see a man become a winner or be alongside a man in his jou…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:39 PM
21

Indeed and it will only get worse. Equality doesn't work especially when women are prioritized by biological impulses for all of society.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:21 PM
89

Another poster said it best: You may not like it, but here is the truth: When men and women occupy a space it becomes a women's space. Their feelings and considerations are put first, as men work to resolve their grievances and accommodate them. A microcosm of society. Therefore, a space that isn't male only can not serve men. It can't be treated as a place to indulge in healthy competition and measure, a place to unload emotions or talk about male issues. Not only will men be too busy serving w…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:01 PM
28

Policing To watch for wrong think. To take what men have built for themselves.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:58 PM
42

This is all by design I have posted this before but posting it again: Sally Miller Gearhart (born April 15, 1931) is an American teacher, feminist, science-fiction writer, and political activist.[1] In 1973, she became the first open lesbian to obtain a tenure-track faculty position when she was hired by San Francisco State University, where she helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in the country.[2] She later became a nationally known gay rights activist.[2] In her …
/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:58 PM
32

What the other person said. Likely also to say these men dare try and escape their DNA fated fate. This harms women.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 08:50 PM
56

It's called dual mating strategy. The things that make a man desirable to women doesn't necessitate a good father or reliable father. So fuck Chad and get pregnant by him and have non-chad take care of you and the baby.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 01:37 PM
12

That is the society hate. Women hate cause gaming is filled with what they see as non-chads and they hate that. That is the primary reason. There are others but thats the primary and society follows.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 09:21 AM
21

Yes. They hate gamers cause gamers are seen as substandard men aka non-chads and despite being substandard they are even worse as a substandard man can still be productive but a gamer is spending time gaming when he could be working to maintain society and create more money and resources to give to women. So it all comes together to hate on gamers.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 09:06 AM
76

Inconsequential compared to other examples given but gaming. Women can game and people will think it is quirky or doesn't matter. But a male gamers is looked down on and attacked by the game companies and media who want to replace them with women.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 08:53 AM
20

They get blamed cause women subconsciously hate them and fellow men look down on them and don't want to be associated with them so they're an easy target that you will get no pushback or flack for using.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 08:27 AM
9

Well yeah. Feminism and education are one and the same cause education for women is just educate them into feminism.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 02:26 AM
11

Addressing your point that men are the blame for why birthrates are low. They're not. The various organizations say that when women become educated, the birth rate plummets.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 01:28 AM
16

And five is the government realizing most men don't care or even want to have kids anymore and having to demonize them because of fear of economic and population collapse, which at this point is probably inevitable You are like the government blaming men. Women of the past could have 11+ kids like my grandmother on mother's side and she was a simple housewife of a farmer. Women are the blockage not men.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 01:06 AM
14

Don't ask me why they do it. If I knew I'd tell you. You answered it yourself. It's called dual mating strategy. This man aka chad gives me tingles aka good genes instinctively but he has issues of not being a good father. So another man aka beta more suited to being a father I will dupe to have that role.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 06:31 AM
2

Based. I get the Matt Walsh and similar pov. They want families cause families bring out well adjusted children and society is maintained. But they refuse to follow actual tradition of women's duty. Women can still be modern woman but you the man must be traditional but have no real power cause of the state and culture. It's basically what feminism wants. Just sold by conservatives which is why I call them conservocucks.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 04:29 PM
19

I tell you guys, even if you think the redpill or whatever is horseshit. Accept one theory of theirs as the truth. It's called the shit test. It's when women subconsciously test if you're a real man or crap. Open up is a shit test.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 12:59 AM
8

Great news. How is the show?
/r/MensRights12/04/25 11:17 PM
137

Muh study says what is obvious to anyone with eyes. Like seriously, are there any shows recently of a father and kid duo where the kid is a boy? It's usually all daughters.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 04:01 PM
22

Come now, I just use the terms cause they easily bring to mind the type of man I'm talking about. Everyone knows what Chad or alpha man means. And everyone knows what beta male means. That's all. It's easier then having to type up a list of traits.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 07:03 AM
114

There are articles about cheat passes for Christmas. There are articles that talk about how monogamy is hard for women. Let me be frank, the goal is and has always been polyamory for women or open marriage for women. Women will have a beta who is married to her that exists to provide her resources and security while she openly goes out to fuck Chad without censure.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 08:59 PM
3

I don't believe it not cause me I give a shit about Russel. This goes all the way back to the 1999. How many fucking years did you have to bring this up before? Only now when it's so very convenient for the elites? This is a job. Edit: OK, I see upto 2005. Fair enough then. I'm just going wtf at the 1999 one.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 09:27 PM
6

No worries. And yeah, my bad that it's long but it's necessary. Likely someone better at writing could make it smaller. Just to give a small example of what I'm trying to say. Objectification is bullshit. It's used by feminism to remove things aimed at men for the reason of spite. Degeneracy aimed at women is fine as shown here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bDANTCuT908&pp=0gcJCdgAo7VqN5tD Women writers wanted call of duty to have gay romance. Call of duty of all things. No romance or sex or obj…
/r/MensRights08/04/25 01:58 PM
3

It should be obvious by my post that you replied to. Come on.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 01:43 PM
5

I'm not out to convince women or feminists about why they feel what they feel. I legit don't care what they think. My posts is mainly about answering the question of fellows who don't believe the mainstream narrative anymore and thus come here or to KiA but don't yet have the full picture. So yeah, you're right. But that was never my intention.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 01:39 PM
23

I'm going to post a comment I've made in another subreddit that'd about video games but it applies to basically all media. Reposting the reason why That's because they don't have a problem with scantily clad women. What they hate is the sexuality of men that are, or that they believe to be, unattractive. They see good looking women in video games and think it's for unattractive men. That makes them aware that unattractive men exist, which they hate. The reason they don't walk around furious in a…
/r/MensRights08/04/25 11:19 AM
3

That's the one. Thanks
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:13 AM
0

I explain why it's like this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/1FbILJ2nqB To summarize, it's human nature.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 06:20 AM
19

Kek, More women need to be given leadership while men get dragged off to die by drones and artillery. But also said women can go to other countries to find new cock and divorce their husbands stuck at the front lines. For said women who haven't left, they swipe left on veterans cause le trauma and they don't want to deal with it. But they also won't deal with draft dodgers. The sheet hilarity of this thing called equality.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 08:40 PM
1

Oh I know and said this myself. People just comment online that more feminism will fix things
/r/MensRights26/03/25 04:20 PM
2

Spicy. Be careful as this may get a mod attention. Anyway, the issue is that the West spread it across the world though even if we take on what you said.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 11:57 PM
7

By you I was meaning the West though. Come on.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 03:12 PM
10

Sure, but feminism came from the West. You even tried to import it into Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 03:09 PM
17

It's the other way around, bro. Feminism came from the west and is exported everywhere else. Even Chinese women are feminist.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 03:06 PM
34

The real joke is that none of this stupid worship works. The birthrate goes lower.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 02:32 PM
49

Oh no. They won't marry the men they never wanted to marry in the 1st place. The horror.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 08:16 PM
12

Agree with you there.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:39 AM
14

This has long been a red pill or black pill talking point. There are simply too many men alive that cause they are alive suffer from being obsolete/unwanted by women and society. In the past those men either would die in wars or survive and come out desirable. Either way the number of men that are unwanted by women and society were reduced.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:24 AM
16

The government doesn't care. They are at war. They need canon fodder.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:22 AM
2

Interesting. I wish to see if this works as for what has been shown, such measures don't work but maybe it could work for Hungary as they are trying harder.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 05:15 PM
11

Cause society doesn't care. It never has. A child is born that can work and be taxed. A woman is also taken care of and protected. That's all it cares about. A man being duped is seen as his own failure. Should have been a Chad so she wouldn't cheat and get pregnant by another man or looked for red flags. It used to care but that was about the nobility which had tons of money and wars involved. Outside of that, it doesn't care.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 09:23 AM
2

Oh it's not just objectification they complain about now. Game fanservice causes domestic violence according to a french IGN guy. Gamers are incels who need to shut up and stop wanting attractive women in games cause le masturbating but they also do domestic violence. As I said, it's all bs.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 08:50 PM
2

Women wear the outfits to peacock against fellow women that I'm hotter then you aka get attention via validation from men she doesn't want and then use said looks to attract a hot man. It's that simple. If said women is interested in monetizing the simping, she will interact with the men she doesn't want for a fee.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 08:39 PM
2

They all do. Do you think they wear skin tight leggings that hugs their ass and stream it for no reason?
/r/MensRights16/03/25 08:31 PM
9

It's bullshit that exists to shame male sexuality. I'm posting a comment that is about video games and other adjacent media on another subreddit and how there is constant complaints about objectification which has lead to uglification of female characters. That's because they don't have a problem with scantily clad women. What they hate is the sexuality of men that are, or that they believe to be, unattractive. They see good looking women in video games and think it's for unattractive men. That …
/r/MensRights16/03/25 05:25 PM
24

From what I understand, all women are hypergamous but circumstances and society is what restrains that instinct cause they may want Chad billionaire but they will get old eventually and need support so they settle down but as the restraints give way, the instinct is free to run around free.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 12:23 PM
144

This is called Alpha Fucks and Beta bux. Dual mating strategy. Let's say for example, a nerd software man has a lots of money and a woman gets married to him. Doesn't mean she desires him. Just that he can take care of her with money. She wants to fuck a bad boy with muscles cause that is what she desires.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 12:21 PM
2

Well he is a kindergarten kid so bias and stuff like that can be left for later but I do encourage the go outside even now to build a habit.
/r/MensRights15/03/25 07:25 PM
5

Been a thing for a while since Anita Sarkeesian. Always go on about male gaze, the devs or journo scum.
/r/MensRights15/03/25 04:01 PM
5

As another poster said, the earlier he recognizes that the life is unfair and he will have to work hard to get anywhere the better. As he will be less resentful and thus have a more healthy mindset. I would also say as he grows older he should spend time outside more and be more social than spending time inside focused on tech. It will make things easier and healthier for him. Of course this is for when he is older.
/r/MensRights15/03/25 01:32 PM
10

and the woman has no option but to take away parts of what makes this person himself. I just like how you think you're refuting OP but you're proving their point. Lol
/r/MensRights15/03/25 12:34 PM
2

Yup. They made it clear that it's not made for us. So fuck em.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 10:36 PM
7

I don't watch movies or tv shows. I play old video games, watch youtube and read manga, manhwa and manhua. Or just fucking work and sleep.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 09:35 PM
60

The 80/20 rule is not a virus. It's hypergamy. It has always existed just that it was constrained by society and technology not allowing women the ability to see everything in the world. So as women advance in the world, the more hypergamy is released from restraints.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 07:06 AM
4

The religion one is about the Muslims. The UK government fears them and doesn't want to anger them cause voting block plus they're the ones having kids
/r/MensRights06/03/25 03:09 PM
1

Feminism is across the world. Even in China.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 03:07 PM
2

No. There is another term for elites that are what I have described. I think it's rootless elites or nomadic something I forget
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:15 PM
6

The people in charge don't care about the natives. There is a specific term for this that I forget. But they are cosmopolitan elites that can live anywhere and work anywhere. Nations are superfluous to them. They don't think about the natives at all and if they do, it's that they're uneducated, uncultured backward racists and sexists that have blood guilt for the crimes of colonialism, slavery, patriarchy and pollution.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 10:35 AM
18

Could become? You already are anti-white, anti-male and anti-christian. Me a foreigner from Asia can see that
/r/MensRights06/03/25 06:38 AM
7

I agree with you on this
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:18 PM
13

They won't do anything but blame men as usual and put them in prison.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:16 PM
31

For the OP, expect it to get worse. It will get worse as society wants to shovel as much money towards women as possible cause it thinks if women have money kids will come but this is just false. The women will just want men that are even higher earning than them which is falling and falling in numbers.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:08 PM
19

It's performative. They don't care.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:06 PM
1

This.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 08:23 PM
5

Cause he is a bad boy and attractive. A regular man is not so this man gets ick while the rapper doesn't. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 08:23 PM
2

Is irrelevant to my point. Others agreed with her. The institutions didn't care and helped her set up propaganda class and she wanted which is more female power is in progress and male groups being destroyed is happening.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 08:21 PM
2

Of course it won't happen as she wants. The idea is insane. My point is that what this idea says about the ideology it's spawns from. What it says about her fellow feminists who agree with her and how it didn't matter to a university who helped her start feminist studies aka propaganda. What is being implemented is more female power and destruction of male groups.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 05:54 PM
2

What about it? For me , it seems the style that if a woman is unhappy with you and your a man she default to insulting you as incel or loser or sexless, etc. This is even more so if you're a fan of them or a thing they are involved in cause by default they see you as a paypig giving them money cause of you being attracted to them but you don't get any hence loser, incel, etc.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 12:15 AM
10

Sure, but you were talking about happy and cuddling in a marriage where the wife see's you as an ATM and resents you. Sex will be there as she needs to reel you in I grant you that.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:49 PM
20

The woman in question will not love or care about the man. He is just an ATM. She will resent him.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:39 PM
2

It's not fiction. Look at writings, its her seminars for universities. Nevermind what she wanted which is end of male groups is happening.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:59 PM
1

Doesn't change what I mentioned. None of this changes it. You're just proving my point.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:25 AM
1

Cause its used by everyone. Talking of male focused franchises of works.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:23 AM
2

Shrug. That's how society is. Don't ask me. I didn't decide it.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 02:14 PM
5

Nope. Male romance at most if not being a Chad that has girls falling for him but he protects them and saves them and treats them right or other fantasy is hot girl falls for a nobody. It's only on porn you see dark romance types focused on men. It's only on women focused works that dark men are celebrated.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 02:13 PM
2

Well the attitude seemingly is you just have to put up with bad women behavior. No two ways around it. And it's you being a retard and having bad expectations if you're upset about this
/r/MensRights25/02/25 01:52 PM
3

Ah ok. Thanks for the clarification. Both the right and left have the same opinion on this basically. Just when it comes to the shit like movies, tv shows and gaming, the left have the power and are doing the inshittification.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 01:27 PM
12

You are parroting the very society you're talking about. It's not men that's responsible for the low birth rate. It's women. My grandmother on mother's side had 11+ kids. Nearly all daughters. Said daughters either have 1 kid or 2 kids or no kids at all or lesbian. They are nearly all middle class. Grandma is housewife of a farmer. Society blames men when it's women who decide.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 12:49 PM
1

Who are you talking to? Who is evie magazine?
/r/MensRights25/02/25 12:35 PM
2

Reposting this I said to another person: Ah right. So all the complaints by women, game developers and game journos don't exist heh? There is an IGN France who basically said that attractive female characters in games leads to domestic violence.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 12:34 PM
2

ur acting like not being a creep is literally 1984 You're not even reading what I'm saying at all are you? I never said they should be allowed. I never said it's a right. Just that they will do so cause they have nothing else hence why to be able to stop it you have to have control, scandals and banning galore and thus all the drama. You even admit that it cannot be completely stopped which is all I said about that.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 12:33 PM
18

But if a male has his anything similar or tame meant for them, women hate it and want it shut down. This is especially true for shit like gaming, movies, etc.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 11:38 AM
2

Who said it's ok or not ok? I didn't. You are not understanding what I'm saying. The nerds which are the male gamers have no gfs. So they aren't hitting on everyone but here is the dream a girl interested in the same thing they are and thus they hit on her. You can't stop this 100% without Orwell watching of everyone. They hit on her cause they have no one. You might as well say that they can't hit on anyone. Not that I care if they get a gf or not. That's not the point of my comment. Nevermind …
/r/MensRights25/02/25 11:09 AM
2

Ah right. So all the complaints by women, game developers and game journos don't exist heh? There is an IGN France who basically said that attractive female characters in games leads to domestic violence.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 11:12 PM
2

Not just that. It's extremely typical that that is all you focus on. I was just using that as an example of the issues women cause. Another is the need to change shit which I mentioned. Infact, I consider the need to change shit the worst of all issues. Still I thank you for talking to me straight instead of continuing with insults.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:50 PM
3

Not addressing the point and I don't give a fuck if they reject or not. I'm talking about the drama they create and how they demand things change. But I know you don't care about any of that and just do insults.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:35 PM
2

No it doesn't unless you go Orwell watch on every man in said space. Cause newsflash, most men want a gf even nerds but they don't have them cause women don't want them so if a woman enters the space, they think they maybe this can be a gf. And this is just one problem. Ignoring this, the following is another problem: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/h0xXOSEpvk
/r/MensRights24/02/25 03:57 PM
2

Complaints about fanservice and male gaze and always going on about incels. This gets especially hilarious when they are discussing porn comics.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 11:37 AM
7

Correct. It's either we make spaces male only or just give up on having spaces altogether.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:42 PM
5

You're not reading my post at all are you? I posted a feminist whose position is supported by other feminists and helped open the 1st gender studies iirc that male groups must end as they are dangerous and what happened? What they want. This is in response to you saying that spaces where men were the majority can't be for men and must be neutral even though as I have shown, neutrality doesn't work. It just becomes for women. You then say the church. I say that's fine but it has issues which you …
/r/MensRights23/02/25 05:56 PM
3

If that's how you feel, that's fine. I stand by what I said. Your position basically let's just surrender everything to women. That is fine if all you care about is women. Just don't pretend otherwise.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:45 PM
1

You're not addressing my point. I'm not saying don't join a Bible group for men. I'm talking about the church and how women invade anything male oriented to change it for themselves. This idea of neutrality of spaces is a myth is what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:41 PM
4

I did. You say make a small church group. The issue there is churches are gynocentric and these groups if not allowing women in will be for a small amount of men. If all men joined such groups, women will invade.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:36 PM
8

All things nerd men like are like this now. Manhua and manhwa aka Chinese and Korean comics are like this.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 03:46 PM
4

Which falls under demanding things change to cater to them.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 03:36 PM
15

I'm not making this up. Look it up.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:25 AM
21

This. The fundamental problem with women in male gaming spaces is they are still a woman and find male nerds who are the gamers unattractive so any move by said men for a gf comes off as harassment so we get all that drama. Then you get them demanding things change to cater to them.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:22 AM
14

You are not addressing the issue. Neutrality is a myth. Anything that isn't explicit male focused or male only becomes taken over and everything for it having to cater to women and their sensibilities. It's very simple, what matters more to you? men having spaces or women? If women having it all is important to you then just admit that you're fine with them invading and taking over all spaces. You're the majority opinion anyway. Just stop this nonsense neutrality bs.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:01 AM
37

It's feminist doctrine that men cannot have their own spaces. All your policy does is just give all spaces to women. Why not just say men should have no spaces and be done with it? Why do I say this? Reposting the below A prominent feminist named Sally Miller Gearhart who helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in the country at a San Francisco University. This is what she had to say: In her early career, Gearhart took part in a series of seminars at San Francisco State…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:41 AM
2

Please use paragraphs.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 12:13 PM
3

Yes. Equality gets used and said a lot but there is no equality. To be clear, I'm not happy about this. But it's what is happening.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 08:08 PM
15

The problem is that equality is a lie. Human nature prevents it. There is only hierarchy. I talk about this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/MIE1zUvPW6 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/invYNYmtCQ Women will continue to push and people will continue to submit cause the opposite position is immoral under the liberalism paradigm. We can never escape hierarchy. As the links I posted show. Everyone just being at the same level field is impossible cause human nature prevents it. There …
/r/MensRights21/02/25 03:31 PM
5

Which is fine. We can agree to disagree. To explain myself, I'm cynical. I talk about why here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/InkwfHWoJH It shows the "equality" that feminism fights for imo.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 07:17 AM
6

There are comments on here that talk about how feminism even in past waves of 3rd and 4th are man hating. And Sally person did her activism in the 70s and possibly earlier Like this one for example. It's not mine. I can give you the comment source if you would like. Just ask. It wasn't hijacked, it was like that from the start. Built on a foundation of misrepresentations, half-truths, outright lies, and bigotry. In 1848, The Declaration of Sentiments - widely regarded as the foundational documen…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 07:01 AM
6

Feminism is just a female supremacy movement.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 05:43 AM
28

Yes. I hate it and it's feminism to blame for this. Reposting the below: Yes, cause society cares about women above all else especially with feminism with champions erasure of male spaces as I show below I posted a post that talked about this. Here it is: We tend to think that Woke is the cancer eating away at escapism. And this is true, but Woke is far older then we think. And the older woke called Feminism has always wanted to destroy Tv Shows, Movies, Video games, etc cause Men enjoy these th…
/r/MensRights20/02/25 09:09 AM
9

You're welcome and I agree with you. The hatred I say though is towards men not Chad. Though can you tell me where I wrote that feminism is the cause rather then a consequence? Feminism is just a female supremacy movement. The hatred exists irregardless of feminism.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 09:52 AM
2

And that is why there is no solution to the birth rate problem. People know deep down why the birth rate is down. The governments know. But instead of confronting this fact and making peace with it. They come up with all sorts of nonsense scape goat reasons why the birth rate is down which all boils down to blaming men or capitalism.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 08:49 AM
1

It's bullshit that exists to shame male sexuality. I'm posting a comment that is about video games and other adjacent media on another subreddit and how there is constant complaints about objectification which has lead to uglification of female characters. That's because they don't have a problem with scantily clad women. What they hate is the sexuality of men that are, or that they believe to be, unattractive. They see good looking women in video games and think it's for unattractive men. That …
/r/MensRights19/02/25 08:14 AM
49

Yup. Adding an explanation for others below I've posted this before but it bears repeating. It's very simple. That's because they don't have a problem with scantily clad women. What they hate is the sexuality of men that are, or that they believe to be, unattractive. They see good looking women in video games and think it's for unattractive men. That makes them aware that unattractive men exist, which they hate. The reason they don't walk around furious in a world where they think 80 percent of …
/r/MensRights19/02/25 08:02 AM
1

Like I'm a weeb for all intents and purposes from your perspective. I like anime, manga, manhwa (South Korean) and manhua (Chinese) works and I don't think Japan is a utopia. Gamergate interests in it is about the games and anime/manga aka entertainment and only this entertainment staying as is and not changing cause of wokeness. Not about Japan the country. At most the talk is that Japan doesn't follow the route of Europe of importing tons of migrants that end up not assimilating aka Japan stay…
/r/MensRights15/02/25 10:41 PM
3

I was trying to be charitable to women and being fair. I'm far far harsher normally
/r/MensRights15/02/25 08:31 PM
1

Who has ever said this though in this day and age? And we are talking about real Japan. This idea that Japan is a utopia cause anime says is great is I feel an old stereotype of anime fans/weebs/whatever.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 08:30 PM
8

South Korea is even worse. It's a woman issue not a man issue. It's why there is no solution.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 04:59 AM
2

There are women in my country that are short and thin. You'd think that they would be a child from far away but they aren't. A work colleague of mine is like this and she is pregnant.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 04:58 AM
10

I agree with you.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 04:56 AM
-9

I wasn't agreeing with the ban. Just discussing why the ban may be for all men rather than just be against Japanese men.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 04:56 AM
1

Fair enough but it's still just a corporate day to shill out moremoney. Thus a day that's not needed.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 02:53 PM
34

Meh. Let it die. It's a nonsense day made by corporate so we spend more money on women then we already do.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 07:40 AM
17

Yup
/r/MensRights14/02/25 07:38 AM
17

This is funny as he is saying what I'm saying. I never claimed harassment is good. I simply said that your post is very stereotypical of men who have wife and daughters in that you don't care about men and boys at all.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:44 AM
95

You're late. Leaving the gender shit for a bit and talking about race, segregation is good as long as it's against white people.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:36 AM
21

The person isn't on your side though.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:32 AM
19

Hello again, come on try a bit more with the shaming bro. And purely on Japan, South Korea has incidents of men taking upskirts that isn't talked about much.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:30 AM
66

The below explains why It's the same reason that street harrassment and increasingly broad rules about when it's ok to talk to women exist. Obviously, attractive men can approach women at the gym, work, etc. The rules aren't for them. They're for you. They're designed to maximally restrict or eliminate unattractive and average men in the dating world and relegate those men to the apps where they can be filtered out before any contact takes place. Basically unattractive men hitting on a woman is …
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:25 AM
39

Either ban sexual fraternization entirely or accept that you will sometimes be propositioned by people you don't want. There is a comment that explains this in more detail. Posting it below It's the same reason that street harrassment and increasingly broad rules about when it's ok to talk to women exist. Obviously, attractive men can approach women at the gym, work, etc. The rules aren't for them. They're for you. They're designed to maximally restrict or eliminate unattractive and average men …
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:23 AM
18

The classic of muh parents basement cliche. Better attempt than the previous comment. Come on, give some more. I don't know why you're so mad. I'm not saying anything that you don't believe in and basically state in your comment. Family of women trumps everything and this is admirable but also means that you fundamental don't care about men. Is what it is. That's normal.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:05 AM
56

The entire movement of women hating fanservice in video games is cause the men who play video games they hate as they consider them unattractive and hate that they have a sexual drive. Of course there is other reasons like muh politics and social engineering but a lot of this is based on sexuality shit anyway. It got so bad that the UN was brought in. Don't underestimate womens hatred for men they consider unattractive. But of course who knows if this applies to the woman here. We don't know.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:59 AM
-121

I mean, there have been incidents of foreign men doing shady shit in Japan. Maybe she was affected by that and also local men so ban them all.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:55 AM
27

The bragging about I don't care about men cause you have a wife and daughter. It's a known thing. Guy on here was fine with teacher and schools hurting boys psychologically cause it may prevent his daughter coming to harm by association. And nice use of women tactic of shaming. You should try a bit harder though. This attempt is lame.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:53 AM
26

Meh, don't take this the wrong way but the guy you're taking to doesn't care. He looks down on Japan and has a family primarily of women so their safety trumps everything which is a good thing but means that men don't matter to him at all. Cause it's been discussed that a man on here is fine with misandry in schools hurting boys cause it may make his daughter safe. Is what it is.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:49 AM
35

Here is a thread that talks about this: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAJapanese/comments/1fnxm9a/so_do_you_really_have_vending_machines_with_used/ It wasn't a big thing. It was a gimmick of adult stores and it wasn't forced. And yeah of course you have a wife and daughter. Hence why men can be thrown under the bus. We know this already. No need to brag. Edited: I included a link to an article by a big site but the bot deleted it.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:29 AM
5

I don't watch movies or tv. I watch youtube, read manga, manhwa, manhua and books. I also play video games. Hollywood can go die for all I care.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:10 AM
1

It answers the question though. Sex exists to bring about children.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 12:55 AM
9

It's all primal shit so good genes is if you're attractive physically like tall for example. We are not talking about partners here. Dual mating strategy talks about this. You have a partner or potential partner that is a good mate but you don't desire him physically so you get fucked and pregnant by some other bloke and have the good partner take care of the child as the things that make a male attractive such as dark triad traits are not good partner material.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 02:46 AM
1

Who? Women talking to a group of men or women talking as a group?
/r/MensRights11/02/25 12:14 AM
21

It's not a cult. It's been a thing since forever. A woman may settle with a man cause he has resources and money but that doesn't mean she desires him. She would likely physically desire some other man and all that desire is is saying this man has good genes. So fuck him and get pregnant and have the husband pay for it all. It's dual mating strategy. Look it up.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 11:44 PM
7

Women invade male spaces. A feminist basically said that male spaces must be destroyed.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 08:51 AM
6

Don't take this the wrong way but learn to use paragraphs. Jesus, it's one big wall of text.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 10:05 PM
36

Cause they hate them and seeing them as nazi/fascist. Wokery sees white men as oppressors and guilty of original sin so they are always evil and to blame for everything.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 07:29 PM
1

Huh. Interesting. First time I've seen this slang or whatever. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 04:34 PM
15

Narc. I've seen it used as a short form for narcotics taking or drug taking. If you meant narcissistic. My bad
/r/MensRights27/01/25 02:39 PM
12

Cheating drug taking gf who does suspicious things? Bro, just leave her.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 12:15 PM
1

Because that's controlling women and that's bad. All of society agrees that men should be controlled and change. women are perfect as they are.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 07:16 AM
0

Nothing can be done. Woman have career, freedom and money so they are free to only want the top men and not every man can be the top men So you're left with a surplus of men who have no future. Used to be they would be sent off to war and either died or came back with a wife or honor, glory and money and thus got a woman or being dead and thus not a problem anymore.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 07:07 AM
7

The thing though is that their threats are a joke. They will still have sex with Chad and Tyrone. They are just virtue signaling that they won't but they will. Nevermind that the men that they blame for Trump aka the incels are men they will never fuck anyway so the threat is meaningless.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 11:17 PM
4

Fair point.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 10:22 PM
2

I agree. I'm not saying what I'm saying cause I don't care. I do care. I'm talking about the idea itself.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 10:17 PM
2

Shrug. I never said don't do it. I just don't think it will work. I'd be happy if it did.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 10:09 PM
6

To hopefully help you come up with a better plan.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 10:07 PM
17

This is stupid. Just like the women don't have sex with men cause le trump. One, majority of men aren't part of this subreddit and don't care. The men who have sex don't care and the men who care and don't have sex aren't having sex anyway so this changes nothing.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 10:05 PM
43

Because they can. A male doing that is attacked and shamed and checked for being a danger to society. A woman is allowed to do and say things with little repercussions.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 08:16 PM
46

You're getting to the heart of why feminism hates fanservice in media that appeals to men. That's because they don't have a problem with scantily clad women. What they hate is the sexuality of men that are, or that they believe to be, unattractive. They see good looking women in video games and think it's for unattractive men. That makes them aware that unattractive men exist, which they hate. The reason they don't walk around furious in a world where they think 80 percent of men are unattractiv…
/r/MensRights20/01/25 01:43 AM
4

The freckles and likely red hair is going to let everyone know he isn't your son biologically so he will be bullied and you may get talked about behind your back unless you explain that it's a donor kid.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 02:38 PM
1

I see. Well from what I've heard on here the video has the classic trope of a man must sacrifice without expecting anything in return aka le hero so it obviously doesn't want to encourage a man having their own self interest in mind. I have a theory that people call stories with male protags good if said male protag puts himself lower then others as in they care more about others then themselves and sacrifice everything for others. Is what it is.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 06:59 AM
2

Ai as it is now isn't fictional Ai that can make up its own beliefs or whatever. It says whatever it's programmers/whatever put into it so society is what's making Ai biased.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 08:43 PM
2

Haven't watched the video. It sounds like the video is all over the place saying one thing but then saying something else that contradicts the first point. Is that correct?
/r/MensRights15/01/25 08:39 PM
17

Cause it's ingrained into society which is pushed onto men that society depends on men sacrificing for it. A woman can live for herself. A man is not allowed to.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 03:21 AM
3

I get you but all we can do is try and stay strong. I suggest to spend time with friends and family and a hobby that involves lots of activity so that it takes you mind off these depressing topics and issues.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 02:41 AM
13

Hang in there bro. What I can say is this, stop caring about feminism and their bs about the plight of women. They hate you. Stop caring about the enemy. Simple as. Let me post the below as example of what I'm talking about. +++++++++++++ It's bullshit that exists to shame male sexuality. I'm posting a comment that is about video games and other adjacent media on another subreddit and how there is constant complaints about objectification which has lead to uglification of female characters. That…
/r/MensRights15/01/25 02:33 AM
32

The logic outside of that video is women are born with value. A woman will always be a woman. A man is only truly a man when he does things that make him a man. Basically, a woman is a human being while a man is a human doing. It's why there is no insult that a woman is less of a woman unlike for men, you are less of a man of a manchild for example.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 02:25 AM
2

This has been a thing in media for a while. The child is always a girl not a little boy.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 02:16 AM
3

It's bullshit that exists to shame male sexuality. I'm posting a comment that is about video games and other adjacent media on another subreddit and how there is constant complaints about objectification which has lead to uglification of female characters. That's because they don't have a problem with scantily clad women. What they hate is the sexuality of men that are, or that they believe to be, unattractive. They see good looking women in video games and think it's for unattractive men. That …
/r/MensRights15/01/25 01:56 AM
2

Hello, Sorry for not replying. Been busy and when not busy. I was sleeping. To answer your question, I'm no philosopher nor a big head guy. My posts are just observations so I honestly wouldn't know. I do think however that one of liberalisms issues is that it thinks itself like a true path to freedom and equality such that it disregards traditions and behaviors older societies had in place cause it's unenlightened bs made by oppressive or dumb hillbillies of whatever insult you have in mind. Wh…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 07:59 AM
1

Which is fair. I don't hate the liberalism political philosophy btw. I just think it didn't take all of human nature into account.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 09:54 PM
1

The issue is that liberalism reigned supreme and feminism and everything else grew up under it. Hence why I see it as it's children. Nevermind that all male groups got destroyed cause we must raise women up cause equality and freedom which is what you're saying is what liberalism is all about under the cry of men and women are equal and the same so how dare the man exclude women. Fair enough if you see what is going on as corruption or subversion of liberalism but my main point stands
/r/MensRights05/01/25 09:40 PM
7

Feminism I would say is the child of liberalism. Liberalism seeks to try and make people equal and remove oppression from those it deems oppressed so that they can be free. The problem of course is human nature which I talk about in the links. It's well established that women have in-group preference aka natural collectivists. Even in your liberalism, people must unite to bring about changes in society aka collective action. Liberalism also has guilt of the ancestors of if your ancestors or peop…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:52 PM
23

The problem is that equality is a lie. Human nature prevents it. There is only hierarchy. I talk about this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/MIE1zUvPW6 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/invYNYmtCQ Women will continue to push and people will continue to submit cause the opposite position is immoral under the liberalism paradigm. We can never escape hierarchy. As the links I posted show. Everyone just being at the same level field is impossible cause human nature prevents it. There …
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:24 PM
18

And remember, these are the same people that will call you controlling, insecure and evil if you as a man so this towards your wife or gf.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 08:28 PM
1

Gotcha. Thanks
/r/MensRights30/12/24 02:47 AM
1

Many schools (including public schools) and workplaces have dress codes that expressly require men and boys to wear pants. And these dress codes are expressly protected by law as there is no legal precedent (I'm aware of) for calling this obvious form of gender-based discrimination, discrimination. Fair enough. I've never thought about this as schools saying you need to wear this type of clothes just comes to my mind as uniforms which everyone has to wear and not an issue once you stop going to …
/r/MensRights30/12/24 01:30 AM
1

That's what I'm saying though. It's a social issue rather then a law saying you can't. There is no right to fight for and instead it's changing cultural beliefs or attitudes.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 01:11 AM
1

Nope. People do care but again that's a cultural issue and who cares honestly.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 11:25 PM
24

There is no law saying you can't. Just don't expect people/society to treat you seriously. That's a culture thing.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 10:06 PM
9

I think so too. I never implied otherwise. I'm just saying that nobody cares.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 03:59 AM
8

It's biological instincts at play. In the past and we are talking tribal age or even earlier, a hot man that can kill means a man that can become a leader of a tribe or form a new tribe and have lots of resources for the woman and any children she will have and due to being a killer can protect her.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 11:28 PM
6

Women love bad boys which are also the fuck boys. As long as he looks hot, him being a killer just increases the attraction as being a killer makes him the ultimate bad boy. Goes against the rules of society and so on as society can't constrain him.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 11:21 PM
3

Don't say anything. She will lose all attraction to you. Tell a therapist or your friends.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 08:37 PM
33

This. Anyone who thinks that the conservatives like men are stupid. Both sides don't care about men. The left hates men, the right just doesn't care.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:10 PM
7

This ain't new. Read I posted a post that talked about this before on another subreddit Here it is: We tend to think that Woke is the cancer eating away at escapism. And this is true, but Woke is far older then we think. And the older woke called Feminism has always wanted to destroy Tv Shows, Movies, Video games, etc cause Men enjoy these things and thats bad. Why? A prominent feminist named Sally Miller Gearhart who helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in the count…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 09:22 PM
4

Correct but no one wants to admit to this cause it's taboo . So they just go back to the blame men hamster wheel.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 11:38 PM
18

Here is the article about women not caring for monogamy. I made a Reddit post about it: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/egTqeyx3Ez
/r/MensRights19/12/24 01:01 PM
6

I'm just mentioning what I've read of articles years ago. Shrug. I find it plausible cause people talk about marriage at the 7th year having issues. Either way, the main idea would still apply
/r/MensRights19/12/24 11:29 AM
34

Marriage invetiably leads to dead bedroom. It's biological. There is an article that basically states that women find monogamy hard and in marriage the sex drive towards their partner plummets like a stone. It's believed that biologically, women and men stay together just enough years for the kid to make it to 7 and then they're supposed to split up and find new partners to start the cycle again. Society and raising kids into adults makes this a problem however.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 11:10 AM
26

This.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 07:39 PM
5

I only bring it up cause the left which is also feminism love saying that their Marxists and want to abolish hierarchy and oppression but then preach original sin and oppress or well do what OP topic is doing. My point is simply, you can say whatever you want. It means nothing cause hierarchy cannot be overcome. And all efforts just create a new hierarchy and new oppression
/r/MensRights08/12/24 03:16 PM
2

Yes, that's what they claim. But read the OP or other instances where they claim oppression means that they can do anything.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 03:11 PM
3

So they're not real Marxists? My post is more saying no matter what people say, hierarchy cannot be escaped. There will always be a hierarchy and all groups that claim that they're victims are fighting either for supremacy or spoils/resources or trying to climb up the ladder or maintain their place.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 10:34 AM
24

I made a long post about why these people say this that I will just repost here My answer to posts about Feminism is about Equality but it changed. First, I want to expound that I'm no essayist or a writer. Everything I write is coming off the top of my so you will probably see a lot of rambling. My apologies. Now, every now and then we will see posts that Feminism is about equality and it just became corrupted or lost its way or that Feminism first wave is good but every other wave is bad. Femi…
/r/MensRights08/12/24 09:59 AM
10

What irony? Guy says some men just don't date anymore cause they don't trust women like women say that they don't trust men and don't date men or don't date at all. What's the problem? You support those women in that choice, yes?
/r/MensRights07/12/24 12:00 AM
15

It's his decision. Discussion is fine. I'm discussing with you. I'm just curious what the problem is with his decision? Is he required to date women so they can keep getting free meals? Why is it that I feel if a woman says she doesn't date you would go you go girl but you say a man is gay if he made the same decision?
/r/MensRights06/12/24 11:43 PM
19

Why do you care if the person you're replying to doesn't want to bother? Less competition for you and less unwanted flirting towards women yes? Win win.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 11:28 PM
18

Creep just means you're unattractive so an unattractive man trying to flirt or hit on a woman is creepy to said woman.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 11:12 PM
3

I've talked about this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/TfMEjpr3lQ Inclusion and equality are just the roads to supremacy. It's human nature.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 11:16 PM
2

It's a trap. They want to see if you will fall for it and if you do, your a useless male of no consequence.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 08:43 AM
7

Yes. That's all we are. We exist to provide resources or serve by dying for the state. Is what it is.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:30 AM
1

I can see how it went. Security guard, so is armed and possibly toned so she gets tingles and wants husband gone so she can replace him with said security guard hence the assassination.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 03:46 AM
19

I posted a post that talked about this. Here it is: We tend to think that Woke is the cancer eating away at escapism. And this is true, but Woke is far older then we think. And the older woke called Feminism has always wanted to destroy Tv Shows, Movies, Video games, etc cause Men enjoy these things and thats bad. Why? A prominent feminist named Sally Miller Gearhart who helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in the country at a San Francisco University. This is what s…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 03:00 AM
12

Women have to lower their standards cause newsflash. Jobs are finite. Success is finite. Women cannot have success that is given to them more and more and men just have to climb up by their bootstraps and expect their to be so many men that they want at the end. The pool will only grow smaller and smaller.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 01:45 PM
44

Adding to this, male gaze is just controlling mechanism for women to control what men can see even if what they're looking at is a drawing or pixel picture of an adult fictional woman. Its bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 01:18 AM
30

The answer is easy. Men who use sex toys or want fanservice in video games or whatever aren't Chad. They by virtue of wanting these things show themselves as sexual beings but they aren't Chad and thus disgusting aka creepy aka perverse. See complaints about this in regards to video games: https://i.imgur.com/uaG4NOp.jpeg Chad has no need for fanservice. Chad has all the sex they want from women.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 12:55 AM
59

Simple. You aren't an attractive male to her and thus creepy and disgusting. Just be polite to women and don't engage in unnecessary small talk or smiling. It's sad but is what it is. I would also follow what male fellows said. Forget about her
/r/MensRights29/09/24 08:50 PM
2

Cause equality is the lie. It's a trojan horse for supremacy.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 09:56 PM
1

Oh I agree with you there.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 07:13 PM
5

Everyone knows deep down that women are favored so they select for girls. They know about the incel phenomenon so that's another factor that says get a girl as a girl won't be an incel and higher chance of grandkids .
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:58 PM
13

Hypergamy
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:59 AM
2

Sure that plays a factor but the institutions admit that you spread women's rights and education, the birthrate implodes. I can provide you a video of a Chinese woman saying marriage is bullshit and her father lamenting that education made her dumb. Take it up with them. I say that those countries have the same education for women cause it's spread by the hegemon US and NGOs
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:39 AM
3

Sure. I'm not against affordable housing. I'm not even saying that other issues don't play a factor in low birth rate. Just this cope of muh money and muh economy is a lie. Especially when the institutions themselves say, encourage women education and freedom, birthrate plummets. They want women to be free and want education and they want low birth rate. So they don't say what they are saying to support me, some unknown redditor. It's just what they have observed and put into practice. If you do…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 08:47 PM
2

Which doesn't address the problem with why the religious can do it and the poor countries can do it. I can show you a video of a Chinese woman saying fuck marriage and her father says education made her dumb. Maybe more money won't solve anything. Have you thought of that?
/r/MensRights24/09/24 08:36 PM
4

Birth control plays a part but it's tied to women freedom which comes with women education which is known to destroy birth rates as per the below https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/issues/2022/7/8/decline-in-fertility-the-role-of-marriage-and-education https://wol.iza.org/articles/female-education-and-its-impact-on-fertility/long Cost of living can play a part but people in poor countries and living in poverty have large families whereas middle class don't.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 08:29 PM
3

Poor countries and developing countries and poor families have high birth rates. Middle class people have low birth rates. What does make a difference is whether one is really religious. Anyway, women education and how it freefalls birth rates https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/issues/2022/7/8/decline-in-fertility-the-role-of-marriage-and-education https://wol.iza.org/articles/female-education-and-its-impact-on-fertility/long Take it up with the institutions.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 08:25 PM
1

Exactly. Nothing can be done cause it goes against liberalism and against women. They can continue to rail at men playing video games or the economy. The real issue will continue not being fixed and birth rate will continue plummeting
/r/MensRights24/09/24 08:24 PM
10

But nobody wants to put pressure on women as that's controlling. And look at the links I posted. They say education does it. Take it up with the institutions https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/yxPas86It8
/r/MensRights24/09/24 03:48 PM
14

https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/issues/2022/7/8/decline-in-fertility-the-role-of-marriage-and-education https://wol.iza.org/articles/female-education-and-its-impact-on-fertility/long Take it up with the institutions. The Jews who have high birthrates are religious Jews.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 03:46 PM
43

Poor countries have higher birth rate. It's not the economy. Institutions that track birth rate admit that it's women freedom via education that destroys the birthrate
/r/MensRights24/09/24 03:24 PM
1

I mean there was that trend of people posting photos of their parents when they were young and they end up being more cool and awesome then the kids posting the photos
/r/MensRights23/09/24 08:47 PM
6

It's an unknown. They claimed that this is the father but nobody can know for sure. Is why the joke of the milkman exists. Nevermind that things like controlling women were in place. They no longer exist.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:45 PM
1

And they won't cause society will not allow it. And society desires to control and change men.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:44 PM
1

It's part of women. How do you control that without going against liberalism? Nevermind that's controlling women is le bad under liberalism. Why do you think they push so much that men should not be jealous?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:22 PM
1

Cause there is no solution for men that works under liberalism and conservatism which is liberalism lite. Nevermind that people want men to marry women so that a woman is taken care of into old age and resources go to her child. So they ain't advocating to go mgtow or volcel.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:01 PM
1

Well people like to say that since Japan and SK have low birth rates, they will go extinct. Is what it is.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:00 PM
6

Their birth rate is the lowest in their region. Lower than China and Japan. I have the joke that NK can just wait out SK and then waltz in and take over
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:18 PM
17

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention. Parentally is what they emphasize. Not paternity. That's why in dual mating strategy. Get preggo from Chad, have beta cuck take care of the kid and you with resources
/r/MensRights21/09/24 12:20 PM
51

It's simple. Check out dual mating strategy. Women settle down with husband material men but don't sexually desire him unlike Chad.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 05:16 AM
33

What you are witnessing is just tribalism in action. It never went away. It was always there hidden by the lies of equality. Equality is used by groups as a trojan horse to advocate for their own interests
/r/MensRights02/09/24 07:01 PM
1

The problem for you is that equality is a lie. Human nature prevents it. There is only hierarchy. I talk about this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/MIE1zUvPW6 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/invYNYmtCQ Women will continue to push and people will continue to submit cause the opposite position is immoral under the liberalism paradigm. You can never escape hierarchy.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 01:55 AM
68

Those women who say open up on social media are just virtue signaling. Though I suspect that open up is subconsciously a female shit test women don't even realize that it's this. They want you to open up so that they can then dump your ass
/r/MensRights31/08/24 04:27 PM
1

This reads like some 4chan shitpost
/r/MensRights28/08/24 01:59 AM
1

You'd think 50+ years of "equality" being one of the most talked about values in the west would have made us more likely to eliminate gender roles. But I guess equality has only ever meant propping women up. I talk about this here https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/SmTHFJvudM But to summarize, equality is a trojan horse to supremacy for the side demanding equality
/r/MensRights16/08/24 08:24 AM
18

Fuck no. I've had thoughts that the military would be good for young men. To instill discipline and build brotherhood plus there are benefits like education but with the wars where you will be cannon fodder, fuck no.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:31 AM
26

Hillary said it. We have New York times article saying it's so sad Ukrainian women have lower dating opportunities cause of the war as many men are dying or getting maimed. Basically, saying yes, women are the victims of war
/r/MensRights06/08/24 10:38 PM
28

Yes. Society has to support her
/r/MensRights06/08/24 09:53 PM
1

This. That's why she has the ick.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:39 AM
62

Pretty much. The elites will support this. Cause as seen with Ukraine and conflicts all over the world. Women will never ever truly be the enemy of elites. Its the men that they're worried about. Support women to push down men
/r/MensRights01/08/24 11:34 PM
121

It will get worse.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 11:08 PM
53

Yes. And yes she doesn't respect the white knight. He is an ATM. She misses the isis guy
/r/MensRights24/07/24 10:08 AM
1

Look, my position is very simple. Society forces men to change. I want society to do the same to women. I don't care if they can't change or can change The changes make men miserable then equality is women facing the same thing. It's that simple. Your position from what I'm able to understand flip flops. You say they can't change but then complain about hypergamy and how men should be running feminism which is retarded. The correct answer is no feminism at all.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 09:19 AM
1

Like your stance makes no sense. You say feminism would be good if men ran it which is retarded as feminism is just female supremacy. You then seemingly support, women can do as they like only men must change but then complain about hypergamy. If your position is that men must change and be forced to change but women should be free to do whatever, then you have no right to complain about hypergamy.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 09:04 AM
1

So then you can agree with the sentiment that women's nature need to changed by them rising above it just as men are forced to so?
/r/MensRights17/07/24 03:43 AM
4

Correct. It's blamed on society which just is cover for men as that's what they really mean.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 04:17 PM
1

No one ever makes the it's nature so nothing can be done about it for men. Just for women. Men must rise above nature is the rhetoric
/r/MensRights15/07/24 06:07 AM
8

If you're not a false flagger, here is what I say. Look, you can blame God or Evolution or whatever. You have the body that you do. There is nothing to be done about it. If you believe that girls won't like you for the small dick. Just truly accept that and move on. Live life in some way happy to spite God or Evolution. That's all I can say.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 04:08 AM
26

This sounds like a rant done to discredit this subreddit more then anything else to me. A false flag
/r/MensRights14/07/24 03:57 AM
4

Birth rates imploding and society dying out from said society low birth rates. Migration is not a fix as the people come from countries whose birth rates are also going down never mind that said migrants after settling down, over time they may also have low birth rates. And said migrants due to having higher birth rates then natives just end up changing the country so it's no longer that country anymore. If I removed South Korean's and replaced with them Pakistani's, does South Korea still exist…
/r/MensRights11/07/24 09:47 AM
7

Birth rate is down and going down all over the world. In western countries, it's propped up by immigration. Respecting women doesn't increase the birth rates. Feminism and everything that comes along with it is what tanks the birth rate.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 09:43 AM
59

Anyone who comprehends reality knows this. They just prefer to pretend that it doesn't exist or is not the case. And if they do address it, it's just work harder men but they will of course make sure that women get preferential treatment to get jobs cause equality/equity horseshit.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 05:48 AM
4

And there we go. You can't refute me and so just resort to insults. So stereotypical
/r/MensRights08/07/24 08:09 PM
5

It's bullshit https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/s/zfRUOcsZfo They're fine with objectification as long as it's pandering to women. Men can't be given anything as that's verbotten.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 07:38 PM
1

Oh. Ok then. Take care.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 09:45 AM
1

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here like at all. Feminism is a belief. It can continue to exist as long as it has believers. That's obvious. But what I'm talking about is society. Society running on feminism is not sustainable cause feminism causes the issues I mention. Specifically low birth rates and women not getting married cause no eligible men.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 05:12 AM
5

Oh I fully got you. Was adding to your post. My bad for not making that clear.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 02:07 AM
2

Feminism has the issue of birthrates and marriageable men. Feminism causes low birth rates and by its own actions causes men to lose wealth cause women want that wealth for themselves but at same time demand men to have that wealth also before they will marry said men. That's the unsustainable part.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 11:38 PM
12

Agreed. Though I would say said husbands and dads going are doing so cause of the women in their lives rather than cause they themselves are interested as you've said yourself so my idea still applies. Male critics or reviewers would for sure go but that's their job.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 10:21 PM
64

Never saw it as I don't care about barbie. Speaking for myself and I'm not sure if this applies to all men but in my experience, men don't go looking into female media for the most part. We stick to what we as men enjoy. It's women that demand access to our media As you can see with Star Wars where it was a boy brand that then seeks to become a girl brand but cloaks with it's meant to be for everyone. So I can't really answer your question in good faith
/r/MensRights06/07/24 10:12 PM
2

I've never watched Jordan Peterson. I'm being honest here. My opinions are my own observations. I consider Jordan a tradcuck who exists as containment for men to continue being simps for women and society. Aside from the above, I don't see what this has to do with my post?
/r/MensRights06/07/24 09:46 PM
2

Ok. We can agree to disagree on this point and just see what happens on who gets proven right.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 06:50 PM
4

Now, you might say that DAE, feminism and policies have given advantages to women, but we still outearn them, we still get more raises, we still choose higher-paying fields of work, we still work more hours, we are still more profuctive, we take more risks that pay off, simple supply/demand for labor-intensive jobs means men can do women jobs and most women can't do mens jobs... So yeah, I'm not worried at all. And meritocracy and equality are not mutually exclusive. Feminism seeks to push every…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 06:16 PM
6

Yup. But fools will still talk of equality.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 06:03 PM
15

I know. That's what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 06:01 PM
11

maybe cheap and exploitable workforce? This is another reason as it keeps wages low. Also, divide and rule. Not sure how to explain this but there was some article posted about how Amazon was able to prevent unions working via diversity.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 05:01 PM
3

Thanks. I once believed in equality and I still do in a way (nostalgia for my previous beliefs? Who knows?) but also now believe that it just cannot exist in humanity cause it's not in our nature.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 04:52 PM
10

Observe South Korea also. Their demographics are even worse then Japan's
/r/MensRights06/07/24 04:39 PM
9

Make it easier for women to flee so that they can jump on new dick. Men should be sent in waves to die by machine gun fire and drones. But remember, women are the primary victims of war. /s
/r/MensRights06/07/24 04:28 PM
22

Somewhat. There are other reasons it's done. But yes, it is a part of it as birthrates are down so we need more migrants
/r/MensRights06/07/24 04:15 PM
17

The problem for you is that equality is a lie. Human nature prevents it. There is only hierarchy. I talk about this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/MIE1zUvPW6 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/invYNYmtCQ Women will continue to push and people will continue to submit cause the opposite position is immoral under the liberalism paradigm.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 04:11 PM
138

Feminism is not sustainable. It seeks to push men down in the job market and push women up. That's fine for women as an interest group but destroys marriage prospects cause every man is below them in earnings cause they are stuck with jobs women don't want. Let's not even get into birth rates
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:45 PM
35

Yes. All these rules exist purely to constrain and filter out the undesirable men.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 09:38 AM
7

Indeed. It's feminism that pushed muh social constructs and look where that has gotten both of us. Don't take my post as I'm saying I want those people in your spaces btw. Just I see it as, karmic payback. Hope you stay safe always.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 04:52 AM
131

It's why I don't care if trans people enter women's spaces. Women ruined men's spaces. I have no sympathy.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 09:04 PM
4

We are a minority. Most of maledom are gynocentric. For them women above all even if it's not cause simpery. I recall a poster over on LWMA saying that an MRA on here was fine with schools basically teaching things that could hurt boys in school cause it would lead to girls being protected or so the logic went and that's cause he had a daughter. They can't do anything anyway as no party is against feminism. Not really
/r/MensRights29/06/24 02:14 PM
6

Women want this more privilege for themselves and to kick men out aka revenge. Aside from the above, you're correct
/r/MensRights29/06/24 12:04 PM
3

Quotas got implemented in the 1st place cause equality. Then it became a tool to get privilege for one group and oppression of another group. That's what I'm saying. Equality can't exist cause human nature.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 08:48 AM
23

It's simple. Women's problems are societies problems. Men's problems are them being a problem and they need to fix themselves.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 12:55 AM
7

Then don't bother with dating. Simple as that. I'm sorry if this comes off as callous but I'm just being frank with you. That's how women are and that's how society is.
/r/MensRights26/06/24 07:32 PM
7

Correct. To others reading this, understand that nobody really wants actual equality and that anyone claiming that they want equality is either speaking horseshit cause they're a liar or just naive. Why? Men used to have something called Male groups that helped build brotherhood, camaraderie and thus possibly a bias towards fellow men. But such groups were destroyed by feminism. And there is a reason they did so. Its explicit in feminist doctrine that male spaces are dangerous. A prominent femin…
/r/MensRights25/06/24 06:25 AM
8

Politicians have never cared about men at all. They serve themselves or fellows of the same class as them. That's all they care about. Men are pawns to be used and sacrificed.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 03:02 PM
11

They've always been eugenics. Eugenics never went away. It's just acceptable for women cause women's choice.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:02 AM
4

True. But I was writing my comment from a working within the system perspective which your options aren't considered options usually.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 07:48 AM
14

I'm sure. Animals have that too. It exists to prevent you as a male from wasted effort/work you did to get a female only for her to mate with some other male. But it's demonized in men cause muh protect women but it's not demonized in women hence you get what you get.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 06:17 AM
36

Cause it's paramount to protect a woman and her kid. The man is irrelevant outside of providing income and resources. Eugenics never went away. It just became acceptable as long as it's for women's benefit. Like I recall a country eliminated down syndrome or something cause the women didn't want retarded kids. Same with husband kids not actually being his. If such a situation occurred they believe that the husband is a loser and deserved it and it's a woman's choice. If he didn't want such an ou…
/r/MensRights17/06/24 05:57 AM
7

Correct. To others reading this, understand that nobody really wants actual equality and that anyone claiming that they want equality is either speaking horseshit cause they're a liar or just naive. Why? Men used to have something called Male groups that helped build brotherhood, camaraderie and thus possibly a bias towards fellow men. But such groups were destroyed by feminism. And there is a reason they did so. Its explicit in feminist doctrine that male spaces are dangerous. A prominent femin…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 02:43 PM
1

If you don't want to improve yourself then secure income to sustain yourself and leave it at that.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 03:03 PM
19

Because they want to be able to have a child with another man but have the husband pay for it. Like why even ask why they are against it. This is obvious.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 08:38 PM
1

Yes. Look at the fatphobia movement
/r/MensRights09/06/24 08:36 PM
1

Sure but we aren't talking hypothetical abstracts but reality. And what will actually happen is what I said.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 09:54 PM
1

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/women-get-bored-sex-long-term-relationships/582736/ The article in question. There is another article of giving women cheat breaks for Christmas cause monogamy is hard. And your position just leads to blame the man. That is already the default position. It's why I said, you might as well just default to blame the man and spare us all your long post
/r/MensRights05/06/24 09:29 PM
1

just for instance, i oft hold, man or woman, that if their long term lover consistently doesn't fulfill a good faithed effort at sexual or affectionate fulfillment, that is good cause for them to seek it elsewhere. the cause of such remains the person doing the seeking elsewhere, but the blame lay with the person who failed to live up to their good faithed efforts with their lovers. This is the part I'm talking about. It will always always be blamed on the man failing even though there are artic…
/r/MensRights05/06/24 08:50 PM
1

Hello, Just a question, is u/Academic_Effective_5 a woman? Doesn't matter to me either way but this sentence of yours is strange if said poster isn't a woman. I’m not who you were initially speaking to, but you seem to be skeptical that such women exist (“And yet I don't believe for a second you ever say this to women”). I thought they were a man trying to police fellow men about what they are allowed to say. If they do actually do that of saying to women don't generalize men and I will take you…
/r/MensRights05/06/24 04:16 PM
1

You are writing so much to just at the end say I blame the man. Why even bother? Just say I blame the man and be done with it. That's at least honest.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 02:06 PM
2

It seems to me that you, and many others in this community, do care when women “talk shit.” Not necessarily because it upsets you, but because it gives you the grounds to do the same. For someone who proclaims I'm neutral. You spend a lot of time on the men and this sub and how dare they complain. I frankly don't believe anything you say. You're just here to shame men cause they dare to say something about the poor women. Cause all you're doing is how dare men say these things but you don't bat …
/r/MensRights04/06/24 09:15 PM
2

And yet I don't believe for a second you ever say this to women. That's why I see posts like yours as just shaming attempts of "how dare you disparage women" and as for myself, I don't care if women talk shit about us. I want them to cause it reveals their real opinions which can be used to awaken fellow men.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 08:07 PM
2

And we should care about your muh hypocrisy why? Women already all day make generalizations about men and nobody cares and agree with them. The only reason you're complaining about this to me is cause men dare to speak up in return. This is not the gotcha you think this is. Us generalizing them is just returning the favor but I'm sure you don't like this.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 09:34 AM
1

There are feminists on here plus people when forced to cause there is no escape will admit that at the end of the day, women's feelings and freedom trumps everything else. Even society. Is what it is. Hence the downvote you got. Don't care about the imaginary meaningless numbers.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 08:01 PM
1

Welcome bro to realizing that anyone claiming that they want equality is either speaking horseshit cause they're a liar or just naive. Why? Men used to have something called Male groups that helped build brotherhood, camaraderie and thus possibly a bias towards fellow men. But such groups were destroyed by feminism. And there is a reason they did so. Its explicit in feminist doctrine that male spaces are dangerous. A prominent feminist named Sally Miller Gearhart who helped establish one of the …
/r/MensRights29/05/24 10:44 AM
1

I think that's settling though. There was some news article or report where they were blaming men for the fact women were going single and not marrying cause eligible men that they wanted aka higher status and earners then said professional women weren't around.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 09:47 PM
24

And are putting into practice. Look at OP and what has happened to male groups. One thing to realize about feminism, a lot of what they say is projection. They do or want the bad things to happen just done to men and cause they have the thoughts it must mean that the evil men must have it too. Look at the crying about AI sexbots or whatever replacing women and yet here we have this cull men and then the OP.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:35 AM
21

But it's legit from wikipedia.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:26 AM
57

They've had these thoughts for a long long time. I have posted this before but posting it again: Sally Miller Gearhart (born April 15, 1931) is an American teacher, feminist, science-fiction writer, and political activist.[1] In 1973, she became the first open lesbian to obtain a tenure-track faculty position when she was hired by San Francisco State University, where she helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in the country.[2] She later became a nationally known gay …
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:37 AM
1

They apply the class conflict theory of Marxism with the bourgeoisie vs proletariat to men vs women. You see it all over identity politics. It's why you have POC vs White people. POC means people of color all united in solidarity against the white male oppressor. Nevermind these people constantly complain about capitalism. It's why people call them Marxists.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:36 AM
1

Yes. But the difference is that those men are abhored by the very women in the article. They can at any time choose one of said men and be a couple and form a family but they choose not too. They deserve the best after all. Those men are lucky to get a girl at all. I have no sympathy for the women in OP.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:21 AM
28

We used to have other things that built brotherhood but you can thank the feminists and government for destroying said places.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 11:57 PM
14

Shaming them is pointless cause even if they didn't coom. They'd still support women cause that's the default position of society and it does everything it can to indoctrinate it into boys. Men who call themselves MRA start talking like feminists when they have daughters.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 11:27 PM
61

Lol no. I'm anti-feminism
/r/MensRights14/05/24 11:25 PM
109

Makes sense and feminists agree with this even. That males groups are dangerous. I have posted this before but posting it again: Sally Miller Gearhart (born April 15, 1931) is an American teacher, feminist, science-fiction writer, and political activist.[1] In 1973, she became the first open lesbian to obtain a tenure-track faculty position when she was hired by San Francisco State University, where she helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in the country.[2] She late…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 11:16 PM
19

And the feminists plan continues to move forward. Because thats what feminists mean they say equality. I have posted this before but posting it again: Sally Miller Gearhart (born April 15, 1931) is an American teacher, feminist, science-fiction writer, and political activist.[1] In 1973, she became the first open lesbian to obtain a tenure-track faculty position when she was hired by San Francisco State University, where she helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in th…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:20 AM
3

True. I was just talking about attraction but yes. You don't get called a creep for looking if you give them money. Lol
/r/MensRights12/05/24 02:29 AM
5

Partying, divorcing their soldier husbands and getting railed by new men.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 02:00 AM
4

I will post a long comment I made to others on other subreddits. It explains things The woke aren't prudes. They hate male sexuality which is why they go on and on about muh male gaze and hot women in video games. I will post a long post below. The post talks about why feminism seeks to insert women into everything and below that is the explanation for why the woke despite talking and acting like prudes are the biggest sexual degenerates. ++++ Men used to have something called Male groups that h…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:58 AM
0

I never called you a white knight. I'm referring to the other poster who called you a whiny cunt. Your post basically gave that guy and possibly others the impression that either you're a woman or a white knight. It's literally why I said, you really should have said that both sides shouldn't do it rather then frame that women should be allowed to say bad things about men cause we do it as it's not much of a threat when they do it anyway as I mentioned.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:58 AM
-1

Sure. But your post just tells men that you really only care that men are making generalizations. After all, why say then it's ok if women do it. As if they don't already do it. You would be more consistent and less making people think you're a white knight by just saying both sides thing originally.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:40 AM
-1

They already do it everyday. It's men who are said and demanded to shut up.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:37 AM
11

Yeah, your position supports what I said. How dare those men look. They're unacceptable men. Like you just admitted to it. Creepy is just unacceptable men whether it be cause of attraction or cause not giving the woman money. You keep going on about staring even though if a man just took a look, it's also muh creep cause of what I mentioned above. It doesn't matter to you however cause what matters is women above all. It's why you did the oh so scary shit earlier which I mocked cause that's basi…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:21 AM
19

I don't care if you think I'm a grown up toddler. I understand your position fullly from your posts and thus get that you won't care about anything I say so I won't treat chatting with you seriously. Why bother? Anyway. It's not one incident. It's the most famous one. And one incident of a woman having a problem or having something happen to her is treated as a national emergency so spare me on that. There are many incidents of women barely wearing anything on camera in gyms accusing men there o…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:06 AM
16

I'm not really sure what gym incident you're talking about, but one incident doesn't conflate to justify a complete generalization -- I've never seen anything like what you described occur. One incident is enough to ruin a mans ife. For a woman, it's nothing. And the incident I'm talking about is a blind man accused of being creepy even though he is blind and got harassed over it. And you never seeing it means nothing. Things happen in the world that don't involve you. Women can dress however th…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:49 AM
11

Won't work cause they will just import migrants to replace you or automation.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:10 AM
29

Sure. But a lot of the times it gets applied to men that are not conventionally attractive and didn't stare. Just the women found him creepy or interpreted that he was staring at her and people jumped on him for it such as the gym incident with a blind man. Never mind they go out of their way to dress clothes that basically are 2nd skin and record themselves for simps to watch but men in the area just taking a look which they can see cause camera are creeps. The 2nd part just tells me they go mu…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:07 AM
32

Sure. The difference is that society gets involved and punishes men cause it's women. In your case, society doesn't care. If society didn't care for both sexes, I'm fine with them feeling the way they do. But it doesn't. Every creep cry causes society to sperg about evil men and more must be done. Look at the gym fiasco. Blind man targeted as creepy cause a woman said it, it must be true. Kick him out.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 07:40 PM
58

Basically. Though honestly, those rules only exist to control the betas and suppress them. They were never meant to apply to Alphas.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:18 PM
516

Because they want attention from Chad and to peacock against fellow women that I'm hotter then you. If you ain't Chad, you shouldn't even look at them. To look at them means you're a creep. It's very simple, creep just means man I'm unattracted to dares to be attracted to me.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:37 PM
3

Cause it's not possible. Human nature won't allow it. I go on about this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Fgi9dmdMxU
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:16 PM
1

All one might do is just sabotage themselves. It's up to us to become better, instead of worse, for ourselves or the people who truly care about us. Instead of people who want people to burn just for having the genitals that someone who hurt them did. A question though. Do you have this attitude towards women or just men?
/r/MensRights10/05/24 09:48 PM
2

Indeed.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 08:08 PM
2

Sure. I don't disagree with you but let me be frank. Nobody will do anything. What's more likely to happen is a bachelor tax on those men to pay for giving women money to have kids.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 08:07 PM
5

I agree with you. All Im saying is that one can say fight all they want but some people will just never get anywhere and this is born by how a few men actually procreate. Discussing this cause we're discussing gfs here. And those that say fight don't actually do anything to help these men. It's just a platitude they say but don't really care about if you get what I mean.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 07:42 PM
6

They were never fighters though and nobody cares to help them fight. So all that's happening is they being lonely until they kill themselves.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 07:22 PM
7

Welcome to realizing that anyone claiming that they want equality is either speaking horseshit cause they're a liar or just naive. Why? Men used to have something called Male groups that helped build brotherhood, camaraderie and thus possibly a bias towards fellow men. But such groups were destroyed by feminism. And there is a reason they did so. Its explicit in feminist doctrine that male spaces are dangerous. A prominent feminist named Sally Miller Gearhart who helped establish one of the firs…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:54 AM
4

See, it's fine if a woman does it. It's understandable. It's horrible if a man does it. Don't take or accept any excuses.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:34 AM
4

No. They believe in it. Just for the men that they disdain which is not the men you mention like husbands or sons, etc. Rest of maledom basically
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:32 AM
3

It's not financial. Poor countries have higher birthrate. It's ruch countries whose birthrate fall.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:45 PM
1

Btw OP, you forgot to censor the twitter name on the 2nd pic. I'd fix that as soon as possible or post will get deleted or whatever by the mods.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:29 PM
16

Retards will be retards. Not much we can do about this. Cause it's not about facts. It's biases, emotions and belief.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:26 PM
1

Ok. Then why did you post come off as blaming the common man then for not gatekeeping? That's what I've been saying. Society needs to change. The elites need to stop what their doing. Saying that men as in common men need to stop pandering is the opposite of this.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 05:52 PM
1

Then your post of if we just stopped validating them is effectively pointless. Cause you can keep saying that but what matters is societal and they will push women into everything and local groups can't stop it. That's my point. You stop women from your group. Great but if your group is organized around a bigger activity on society, the women will be able to be in said larger activity screwing it up and by extension screwing up your smaller group.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 07:08 AM
43

This is why imo is one of the biggest reason the elite class love feminism. It weakens men and the women will never oppose the elite class.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 07:00 AM
17

When feminism invaded videogames and nerd domains.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 11:34 PM
1

Correct. The issue is that you can prevent them from entering your group locally but that doesn't matter cause outside of locally, all of society will support to push them into occupying the new unconquered space including the businesses that cater to the hobby for example like gaming corporations for video gaming. How does one stop that then?
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:54 AM
2

Yes. They're supposed to wallow in misery and end themselves. That's the logical conclusion from how they're treated.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:50 AM
2

You're welcome
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:46 AM
12

Yes, cause of indoctrination and liberalism. I posted a long post that includes a feminist telling you what feminism wanted. You can dress it up all you want that this attitude of yours is mature but all you're doing is original sin. Blaming people of the current generation for shit that happened long before they were born and saying that they're weak cause they weren't born to stop feminism in the past or they're weak cause they didn't stop star wars from being sold to Disney. How could they ha…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 12:40 PM
12

Don't listen to that redditor. He is trying to shame you with man up to shut you up. It's a typical feminist tactic
/r/MensRights29/04/24 12:33 PM
16

No, they are being taken away. Women entering those spaces either destroys it or changes it. See what happened with the boy scouts where they have to have women in the boy scouts but not boys in the girl scouts. And then video games and movies changed as well. You not seeing it does not change the fact it happened. Do you think the denigrating of the male heroes in Star wars is just a coincidence?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 12:33 PM
52

Why? That requires a long explanation. The ideological reasoning is the below: Men used to have something called Male groups that helped build brotherhood, camaraderie and thus possibly a bias towards fellow men. But such groups were destroyed by feminism. And there is a reason they did so. Its explicit in feminist doctrine that male spaces are dangerous. A prominent feminist named Sally Miller Gearhart who helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in the country at a San…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:53 AM
57

Yes. Their societies are gynocentric and feminist in their own way cause of the West pushing it all over the world. There is a YouTube video of a Chinese woman complaining that her old parents are trying to convince her to get married and she goes marriage is bullshit, kids are bullshit iirc , etc. It has infected everywhere. It's why their women in video games or anime or manga are the way they are. An escape from reality.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 03:08 PM
1

No, you misunderstand me. I don't care about women bleeting that they're lonely. That's why I specified that. I agree with you thelat the delusion needs to be broken. But I'm not sure how when people still send kids to school that indoctrinates people never mind all of society saying that the delusion is right.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 03:15 AM
9

Indeed. Once you understand that they're bullshit spouting tribalists trying to shame you using points they themselves don't believe in. You realize that they're the enemy and you don't give a fuck what the enemy has to say.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:35 PM
2

Yeah but that's inevitable. This is just woe is me by women. They still won't change.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:29 PM
9

Yep. So to summarize, they don't like attention when it's from unwanted men aka average men. They want Chad. Chad can do as he likes with them and they don't mind. Or they can do as they like with chad but this does not apply to the average men.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 12:47 PM
19

Do you want to know why they're like this? It's very simple. I will post a long comment here from another subreddit that is about gaming that explains why they're like this. That's because they don't have a problem with scantily clad women. What they hate is the sexuality of men that are, or that they believe to be, unattractive. They see good looking women in video games and think it's for unattractive men. That makes them aware that unattractive men exist, which they hate. The reason they don'…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:29 AM
-2

And they will say that it's cause of the oppression of women. So by that logic, when women are free the average man gets kicked out.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:11 AM
-6

There are studies that say majority of men never reproduced anyway. We have more female ancestors then men. Cause eugenics is ok when it's women so people don't care about you post. They say that those men deserve it. Even if according to some people the kids being born are low IQ meaning the eugenics is doing opposite of what was supposed to be done.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:07 AM
17

You can't fix this issue. Not without collapse of civilization or just cutting women out of the equation. Talking about birthrate here. If your issue is women are alone. I don't care. Fuck em.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 09:59 AM
88

Ok. Why should we care? I thought women were perfectly fine being single? The media says so. We men are told that we aren't owed anything so same applies to you. So suck it up sweetie.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 09:06 AM
14

Yes. Female in group bias.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 08:00 AM
25

This shit is spread from the Universities where all the influential and rich people go to and they climb up the ladder alongside other people who have also been indoctrinated the same way.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 09:00 PM
1

Let's see if this works. If it doesn't, it destroys this nonsense that the problem is money.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 08:46 PM
4

Agreed. I don't mind the subreddit. I'm not squeamish. Just saying what will happen which is dying for an ungrateful society and getting mocked on how you died.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 12:44 PM
8

That's what I am talking about. That and combatfootage subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 07:16 AM
12

Not just social media and dating apps but I do agree with you that they're a problem. The other issue is women having success. They become wealthy but cause of this demand a man even more wealthier then them. With how schools cater to women, men that could have been rich don't become so and so you have less wealthier men for said women.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 06:51 AM
16

Absolutely based. With drones, ones death will be recorded and uploaded for people to laugh at you getting blown up. Fuck this shit.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 06:47 AM
115

Yes. It's called demoralization. Make men weak and society is easier to control cause men rebel. Look at Ukraine. The people fighting and dying are men. Not women who are in foreign countries fucking the men of said countries and divorcing their Ukrainian husbands.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 04:26 AM
11

Read this post of mine: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/OLAvFEFUFV Summary. It was always going to be hateful cause that's human nature.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 02:14 PM
2

Not a new phenomenon. Check out dear John letters.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:47 AM
1

You understand how it is. Society sees men as it's workhorse that exists to maintain it and support women.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:41 AM
1

Hentai stuff is just animated porn or comic porn and those have also existed in the West though for the West, it's comic rather then animated. Never mind that you have romance novels or smut novels for women in the West.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 06:54 AM
7

Correct and the reason why is cause she sexually desires him. A woman will get together with a rich man or a man who has money but that doesn't mean she sexually desires him. She desires his money and resources but that's not sexual attraction. Hence she fucks the Chad poolboy.
/r/MensRights29/03/24 06:55 AM
28

Of course it's woke. It comes from Hollywood.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:35 PM
1

Monogamy software never existed biologically speaking if one goes by the OP. It is socially enforced cause it leads to a buy in from the majority of men aka the lesser men. Huh, look, this thing called humans simply aren't really good at long-term term thinking. It has nothing to do with long term thinking. The issue is ideals or ideology. You even said it yourself: It's unjust to restrict woman's property or sexual lives, This is what is important to you above all else. Civilization can burn so…
/r/MensRights26/02/24 06:25 AM
1

Oh I'm sure the women you're talking about exist. I have seen them even. But in general, what I and the other poster mentioned is true.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 11:05 AM
1

Sure. But they will look down on you.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 10:47 AM
2

Wrong. Women look down on nerds.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 10:26 AM
2

You get it. And what's funny is that all the men must self sacrifice bs won't actually lead to family creation that will fix the birth rate. Why? Cause women have the choice to delay having kids or not have kids at all. My family, on my mother side, my grandmother has I forget the exact number at the moment but 10+ kids. Majority female. Those female children either have 1 or 2 kids or no kids at all cause career or lesbians. As you said trade offs. It's why I have said before that there is no l…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 08:21 AM
3

Western feminism, as a movement, has major main character syndrome. It is also exported worlwide so I just consider it feminism. Look at South Korea for example of what I mean.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 12:11 AM
3

the MRA's like you come out to try to talk about how men are ignored and oppressed by society. This is your own comment that I was specifically addressing. You make this a gotcha against MRA's. It means nothing cause men are already blamed while women aren't. That is the default. Like you even say don't victim blame!!! which is just trite feminism squealing only ever used for women.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 11:58 PM
3

I don't. What I'm saying is that society and people already do this. So saying gotcha which is what you're saying in your post is just false.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 10:53 PM
3

They already blame men. So there is no difference. The gotcha you think you have means very little.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 10:32 PM
18

It's why I call them cuckservatives. If they pushed their shit while actually saying women also have to be traditional. That would be one thing but they don't. It's only men that need to be traditional. They are basically feminists to me.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 01:56 PM
1

It's a trap. They want you to expose what you're hiding or your weakness.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 04:40 PM
13

So they finally admit to it.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 09:59 AM
16

Here are some more men for you to shit on: You should read this: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/yy2rcv/comment/iwsae0r/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
/r/MensRights18/02/24 05:50 PM
43

Ah yes, we are at fault not the woman who shit on the OP or other women who shit on their bf's or husbands. Nevermind the feminists who whine about trauma drumping. It's always our fault. Typical. When all I said is that don't reveal anything aka doing what feminism says we should do which is not to trauma dump.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 05:48 PM
55

There is a reason the archetype of the femme fatale exists. Manipulation via sex or sex appeal and manipulation are her forte. There is a reason that people love using the below phrase for girlbosses: Gaslight, Gatekeep, Girlboss Women's power is social power and thus they are experts at manipulation.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 05:14 PM
35

I don't say this to be mean just to be clear. Take this as a lesson for the future. Never ever open up emotionally to a woman you wish to have a intimate relationship with. It will explode in your face. You can confide in fellow close male friends or maybe your mother but never a gf or wife.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 05:06 PM
35

Yeah. Academia in the West is lost. It belongs to women now. You can't fight this cause society will hate you for that and both libshits and cuckservatives will throw a fit about your misogyny and thus destroy you. I explain this in more detail here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Yx2QwikPH8 Why it was always going to end up this way.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 02:04 PM
1

Please check this out: https://i.imgur.com/LxfYFJ1.jpg
/r/MensRights18/02/24 09:11 AM
1

Women are the same around the world cause women are women. Look at South Korea where they hate men and are fine with South Koreans going extinct cause muh misogyny. As for Japan, read this: https://i.imgur.com/LxfYFJ1.jpg
/r/MensRights18/02/24 09:10 AM
3

It's an issue of human nature. I talk about it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/GymdxAgXt3 But to add to it, yes. What you can provide is what matters and even then they will fuck around cause providing doesn't give tingles like a hot Chad.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 07:51 AM
1

Based post. Cuckservatives and liberalshits won't care though and are fine with all of this. Just work harder is what they will say while handing more and more to women. Not caring that the more women have the greater expectations they have on men.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 07:41 AM
5

Then I would call you an actual conservative. What I'm talking about is the normie conservative who is happy with strong independent woman working and climbing the ladder higher and higher and just say work harder men after all men need to meet women's standards cause thats muh natural. They at most will freeze the gains feminism has gotten women but increase the pressure on men. and I will give you an upvote cause you're an actual conservative or what you posted is what I consider actual conser…
/r/MensRights18/02/24 12:45 AM
2

I agree with you but conservatives are imo cuckservatives. They speak of tradition but they won't actually do tradition when it comes to women. At most they will still leave things as per what feminism has gotten to but increase the pressure on men. Not that the left are any better. Both suck.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 11:29 PM
1

Seeing as you mention you don't like porn. Why not just drop it then? See how you feel after that. Like take your own words of wanting to drop it and just do it. I find your comment about it ruining fiction weird but whatever. So drop porn and do the music thing you mention. Maybe take up learning instruments or go outside as they say and take up a physical activity as a hobby like jogging or wilderness trekking. Take a break from fiction, relationships and sex. Just focus on doing what I mentio…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 07:47 AM
4

Women can have their spaces but men can't. Thats what feminism advocates for. Infact one of the early feminists who helped start women studies said that male only groups and thus spaces are dangerous and evil. Its explicit in feminist doctrine that male spaces are dangerous. A prominent feminist named Sally Miller Gearhart who helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in the country at a San Francisco University. This is what she had to say:In her early career, Gearhart t…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 06:06 AM
30

Cause women and thus society despises men that it considers to be losers aka those men that women don't want. The only reason a man would have such a toy is cause he doesn't have a woman so he is a loser and deserving of scorn and ridicule. Its why you have for example people ridiculing video games of not being mature where maturity for example is making everything ugly and non male gaze oriented. Only loser men want attractive women in video games. Its all just excuses for the fact that women h…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 04:34 AM
3

It's a known thing that women like men that already have a woman such as married men cause by virtue of having a partner means he is vetted as being good. I also postulate it boosts their ego cause of they manage to get the man it means that they are better then the woman they stole the guy from.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 04:25 PM
3

Shit test. It's a shit test.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 02:40 PM
5

It's always been a thing. Women fuck foreigners. Just look at WW2 France, you had women who willingly fucked the Nazis or Ukraine women fucking around abroad while their husbands fight in the trenches.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 02:18 PM
3

The majority of the world knows. Even Thailand with all it's Ladyboys or my country who also has them knows. It's a Western issue really.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 02:16 PM
2

As a reaction, men as a whole started rejecting the classic machismo of that period. But women stayed attracted to the machismo, and were pretty high maintenance. Like, a lot. So, a lot of recently "unfanged" men just didn't want to bother with women and their neverending list of demands, for what seemed like a very small RoI (basically, a woman that's hard to entertain, maintain, that's likely to cheat on you, and that'll become a mother as soon as she gets a kid, ignoring her husbands and some…
/r/MensRights14/02/24 02:14 PM
2

Yes. But it uses the lie that they want equality for all as a cover
/r/MensRights14/02/24 06:12 AM
40

Because you fell for their bullshit. Look, body positivity is for women. Full stop. It's so that a woman can be as fat as she wants and nobody can tell her she is fat and people have to think she is hot. Feminism says it's for equality for all to cover up it's real goal which is more power and privilege for women.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 06:05 PM
2

To make men put up with relationships so as to ensure that a woman is taken care of till she dies plus hoping children are borne.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 07:01 PM
2

Cause society collapses otherwise. They talk of bringing back conscription in the UK for example as I sometimes watch UK news. Of course it will be men who will be drafted to fight and die while women continue slutting in clubs.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 05:34 PM
1

You could still admit slavery is wrong however? Yeah but I don't go on and on about it like you do the below. I’m not whining I’m pointing out the issue with it. What used to happen is predatory and child exploitation and could get you put in prison and on the sex offender registry for life. And? Hello pal, the people who did it are long dead and thought differently from you and me. What does post of yours achieve? What do you want me to do about it? Definitely not a feminist 😂. I can be 100% ab…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 04:21 PM
1

Not a Westerner. I don't give a fuck about slavery. So take your guilt tripping elsewhere. So not a child but still a minor and under the age of 18. So still predatory and illegal. A 16 year old is still a minor. And? What do you want me to do about it? You can whine all you want. It happened in the past and I was just using it as an example of what used to happen. Yes, and it’s a mother paying this woman to take their clueless son’s virginity. Respect for women and knowledge doesn’t come that w…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:42 PM
1

I'm talking about stuff that happened in the past. Do you want me to throw a bitchfest about shit that happened in the past? As for boy, it's obviously not a child more like 16 or older. And for the case in the OP, it's 20 year old men or some such who are clueless about sex or anything involving women. I find it cringe but there is little to get upset over.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:26 PM
1

It's kinda like that story of a dad paying for his son to become a man by having a prostitute take the boy to bed. That's what this is. Unless you're insinuating incest is happening or something?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:49 PM
1

Well society and women will shame men for this which is why one must not care.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:48 PM
15

You will be seen as a failure of a man and will be hated. You just have to not care.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 05:19 PM
1

I left it all to OP. If he wants to try and get a woman, then it's his choice to eat the poop or he can choose not to eat the poop. My post is just trying to explain to him that he can feel how he feels but reality is reality.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:26 PM
1

It's accept women are like that and you can't change them cause society will never allow it and if you can't accept it then you go mgtow in sense of never wanting women or staying away from them. It's been called going monk.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:02 PM
9

I mean it kinda will. What is marriage? Giving money to a woman for her entire life or until she decides to divorce you in exchange for companionship which includes sex but sex is a big part otherwise deadbedrooms wouldn't exist. If they learn it now instead of later, they won't be bitter at least. Lol.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:52 AM
2

I agree. Its not bad to me. Cringe yes. But not bad per se.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 11:26 PM
1

Here is what I mean: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/b9mCIEK0GQ
/r/MensRights10/02/24 08:02 PM
6

It's part of feminist doctrine. Men cannot have their own groups as that prevents women from having power.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 08:00 PM
11

Good. Though this will lead to them demanding immigration so they can get foreign men.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 07:28 AM
3

I can’t speak for other western countries but for my country I’d have to sponsor her which I won’t do so that’s an easy filter and where does the line get crossed to where it’s gold digging? If a foreign woman is interested due to my ability to provide due to my money going further in her country, how is that different then women in the west wanting sports players, doctors, guys who earn 6 figures, or any guy that makes more then her? Not being combative or anything, I’m genuinely curious on how…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 12:26 AM
5

I'm from a non-Western country and am native here, not an american or any westerner. I know women here who go for foreigners and they are open that its cause money to fellow citizens. I know women who get together with someone until they get bored and then cheat on them with a new BF that they then repeat the process on. And for this case, its with local men they do this. BF they cheat on and the new man that they get with, local men. Does this mean all women of non-western countries are like th…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 11:34 PM
3

Exactly. Stuff like this will help you find people you can build friendships with and you learn a skill or fulfill a dream or a want.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 10:43 PM
3

Those women have the issue of putting good face to be gold digger even more then Western women but I have said before that one can avoid that by not returning back to the West. But fair enough. Fundamentally though, you're still saying that his only source of fulfillment is women.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 10:28 PM
3

Sure but that doesn't change that it's a thing and OP is by his own words tired and in his 40s. I told him to either accept how things are or accept his tiredness and don't bother with women. He already had a wife and long term relationships. What more is needed to satisfy that isn't give women money into their old age?
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:39 PM
3

No problem.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:25 PM
10

Being a man is exactly as you say. But dying and working for the state is also a must. Anyway, please don't do the sex change shit. It's not healthy, waste of money and doesn't work. Never mind it makes you a target in culture wars. Just find something you want to do and do it like hike through nature or explore your country, etc. Of course it has to be legal.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:24 PM
5

Guy is in his 40s. He already had a wife who cheated on him and long term relationships disappointed him. It's already over for him in many ways. But it's his choice which is why I said he either accepts it or go monk. To me you sound more like he needs to get a woman in order to give them money.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 08:11 PM
6

Or go monk as I mentioned to OP.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 08:04 PM
3

I think he means that he bought into the idea that your wife will support you and comfort you that media lies to people about.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 07:15 PM
21

Oh yeah, I do wish to mention this. Political people or parties don't care about men. They are like women in that regard. They demand your work and sacrifice for example conscription and draft but they only really care about women and will leave you to suffer if you have nothing left to give. So don't fall for these charlatans and give them money. Keep it for yourself.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 07:01 PM
7

I hope things get better for you. Yes, a pet will do you wonders.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 06:48 PM
6

Wife doesn't care according to OP and is fucking her younger employee.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 06:47 PM
2

Women invade male hobbies and change it. So I disagree with you. Plus keeping them creates a space where men can keep distance from them.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 06:45 PM
1

Fair enough. I have come to the same attitude involving women and stuff like video games or any male oriented hobbies. Women need to be kicked out.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 05:59 PM
72

I get how you feel but that's just how it is. A man loses a job, the woman leaves and everyone goes "You go girl" It's either you accept it or you go monk with mgtow. One can say let's change women's attitude but nobody will ever do this.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 05:54 PM
1

Sure. We see it all the time. Dark Triad is just the psychology term for it. Many articles that talk about women's attraction towards dark triad traits which is what bad boys have.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 05:43 PM
0

It's called Dark triad. You can look it up.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 05:26 PM
55

Cause women everywhere are the same biologically. In species with two sexes, it's the male that does the chasing. Why do people keep asking these stupid questions? Like even if women all one day chased after men, they still will only want to chase after Chad. Nothing changes. Right now they kinda do chase after Chad but it's mostly signaling that they want him aka seduction which animals do in form of signaling that they're ready to mate But yeah. Nothing changes.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 10:19 AM
7

Womens power is social power aka manipulation and gaslighting. It's why we have this phrase: Gaslight, Gatekeep, Girlboss.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 08:26 PM
17

It's very simple. They want men they are attracted and want looking at them while the rest of men shouldn't look at them. But at the same time want the rest of men to look at her when she is in the mood for an ego boost.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 08:08 PM
17

I will be frank with you, in her eyes you are a loser. Cause she outearns you. Doing more housework will not fix the problem. She holds you in contempt cause she expects you to outearn her.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 06:37 AM
3

Its called revenge and hunger for power.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 06:18 AM
1

I'm not overrating them. Attractiveness matters 90% of the time in regards to attracting a partner and OP is complaining about women so what they consider attractive is what matters. The other 10% is for friendship or just general life and as long as you are average looking or good looking enough, you will be fine.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 10:45 PM
16

Yup.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 07:59 PM
71

No. Only men who are deemed unattractive by the woman or women are called creep. Of course it's more nuanced then this as even attractive men who approach a woman when she is not in the mood for his approach can be called creep. But that again due to just annoying her. It's not what you do. It's how you look and whatever is the subjective mood of the woman in question.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:34 PM
1

TFR? I'm just saying that countries that are all feminism which is all the developed world have major demographic issues that can't be fixed cause women don't want kids or have few kids and it's all their choice so nothing can be done. Edit: The Fertility Rate?
/r/MensRights07/02/24 10:58 AM
5

Just trying to help. As I said, you can do either. It's up to you. Society considers womens decisions, choice and freedom paramount above all else and is perfectly fine with dying out if the option to be done to survive is restricting women. So you can't do much about those women.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 09:43 AM
18

You may consider to yourself attractive but that doesn't matter. It's women who decide what is attractive or not when it comes to men. Maybe you are legitimately attractive but they consider something about you that maybe of no harm to anyone as being bad which is why they react the way they do. So you can either find out what it is and fix it or just focus on yourself and forget them.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 09:38 AM
10

You are considered to be non attractive to women hence they consider you creepy and ick and thus don't want you to interact with them or talk to them as much as possible. Doing otherwise makes them upset and this is what society abhors. Let me be frank, just focus on yourself and realize that you will grow old in time. So do the hustle if only for the sake of yourself when you're old.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 09:32 AM
2

Then go ahead and remove it. Men stop watching Women's sports and you have no audience. Good riddance imo.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 03:33 AM
23

If I would speak redpill or blackpill or whatever, these women do this cause they despise those men. They see those men as weak betas and resent even having those men be in their presence but those men have money and food so they put up with it but they would rather be with Chad. Another reason could be the shit test.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:16 PM
5

Feminism is only contradictory if you believe in their lies about wanting equality. Once you discard that and see them as wanting domination and all outcomes being favorable towards women. What they say and so makes sense.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:54 AM
18

Don't care about their name calling. They are trying to shame you into submission so they will call you whatever even if it makes no sense.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 04:01 AM
1

I wouldn't say that they are all raised by feminazis. It's just how society is, they tell you to be a nice guy and nice to women cause society wants docile men and to of course defer and protect women. This of course leads to women aren't sexually interested in you but oh well. But I get your point.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:37 PM
1

What pisses me off is that we men are blamed for this.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 05:56 AM
4

You want the birthrate to increase? The problem is women. Call me misogynist if you want but its women who have the kids and they choose to have no kids or 1 or 2 kids or no kids at all. Its really that simple. My grandmother on my mother's side had 14 kids, nearly all girls. Those daughters either have 1 kid or 2 at most or no kids at all cause career or lesbian.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 11:20 PM
2

Is not what I said. Just that that's how women are. Sure, one could advocate that they shouldn't be like that and I agree but the problem is that telling women they can't do something is seen as controlling and wrong by society so no luck there.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 12:37 PM
2

It's just how women are it seems. Blame God or evolution. Is what it is
/r/MensRights30/01/24 05:23 PM
27

Yes. This shit is promoted by women and feminism so that women are given more opportunities to cheat around and they use the bludgeon of you don't want to be insecure man aka weak man or a misogynistic control freek do you?
/r/MensRights30/01/24 10:57 AM
1

All I can say is this. Use how you feel as fuel to do better like get a better job or make a goal that you try and strive to complete.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 10:35 AM
3

Maybe they did tell you the truth but there are men who say otherwise that they were told being nice would mean that they would get a wife or whatever in the future but that didn't happen.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 12:35 PM
2

As opposed to sterilizing themselves for the sake of your precious women will help them more? I find your position incredulous.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 04:39 AM
2

Kek, you show yourself off that you care more about women above all seeing as thats what you're saying here. Infact, you're opinion is a woman's opinion. What do I mean? Women just like you abhor such men having any solution. They just want them to be silent and die quietly but work for society and them. Like a slavebot cause society and women abhor said men even spending their own money in ways they don't approve of. You are the same just that such men should sterilize themselves. Why is your i…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 04:36 AM
1

Well there is the solution of letting foreign men overthrow feminism and re-establish the patriarchy. The men we are talking about may well not do any better under said system but the future similar men will at least have real women but I don't think you are for this idea?
/r/MensRights29/01/24 04:29 AM
9

As opposed to just being miserable with loneliness or killing themselves or doing violence? The fact of the matter is that a growing number of men will be sexless and this is inevitable as jobs get shut down cause of outsourcing or given to women or cause AI or cause brought up under feminism just aren't masculine. And women will never want these men. Nobody wants to help these men or make women date down so there is no real solution unless you propose lets have wars so we can throw these men to…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 04:23 AM
7

Don't take this the wrong way but you can keep saying its sad and depressing but you don't actually care about the men who will use this. You likely don't ever think about them aside from possibly thinking that they're losers. So why does it matter if they take themselves out of the dating pool by this? They were never going to get women regardless and you know this. Why does it matter then? It also for the liberal order anway elegantly deals with the problem talked about in the below link: http…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 04:02 AM
11

Thats what the redpillers say; Don't listen to what women say, watch what they do instead. I fully agree with this. Just look at how they write female "heroes/protags" in movies. They if they were men would be seen as toxic male incarnate by feminism. But when done by a woman is seen as strenght. This says that why they push muh toxic masculinity is to make men weak so that they can take power. And the men that don't go along with this, they will fuck them but to hell with the rest of men even i…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 03:17 AM
1

Great write up. Can you post this as its own post? So that the rest of the subreddit can read this and comprehend it.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 01:26 AM
1

Sure. And I don't know about why you're getting downvoted. I can assure you that I'm not doing that.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 10:35 PM
1

Again, thank you for admitting your true nature. Keep spouting not real feminism or the touch the grass feminism which would be you are the true feminist only to reveal the truth with the original sin shit. You can say whatever you want. You're the same as the one's I talked about. Anything else? Some more posts that you pretend aren't about not real feminism when that's just not true.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 12:00 PM
1

Again, by not doing anything they are supporters. You can type up as big posts as you want. It doesn't matter. My point stand and all you're doing is that not real feminism which I don't believe and don't care for. I already told you my opinion on that which is a posted link and a fuck off. And thanks for admitting that you do agree with the muh 200 years so you do agree with original sin bs that the so-called not real feminist spout. As I said, feminism is just feminism. No such thing as not re…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 10:52 AM
1

No, that is what you're effectively saying. The feminists who I'm talking about get shit done. The silent feminist you are talking are about supporters of the previous ones for all intents and purposes cause they don't care. Not their problem right? So they support them. Either way, my position stands. I never said that the book I mention was a feminist book just a book that teaches how to use feminist pushed systems to make men's life miserable.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 10:08 AM
1

Fair enough. But there is an apparent study out that women's interpretation of catalling or harassment is based on looks and age hence why I said what I said. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/176d1o4/womens_interpreted_of_catcalling_or_harassment/
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:58 AM
1

I agree with you. I was adding to your point that its feminists who push shit to repulse men.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:27 AM
5

Muh not real feminism. Such tired nonsense, https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/imsn0t/for_those_who_say_we_dont_know_what_real_feminism/ And oh before you say its muh old, there are books that openly sold about how to destroy men, never mind the countless articles and movies shows by feminists about men bad women good and women better then men. So no, fuck off with the not real feminists.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:22 AM
1

Feminists are creepy. Its feminists that push the uglification/androgyny of women in media and push fat acceptance which as we all know is about fat women and how they are beautiful.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:47 AM
9

Creepy just means that said woman finds you unattractive and wants you to go away.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 01:28 AM
2

There are no real tradwives aside from the Amish. It's just women larping as one. They can still fallback on feminism and all it's protections when needed as you mentioned and they will do so.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 06:31 PM
1

It's why I call traditionalists or conservatives, cuckservatives or tradcucks. They are feminists no matter their rhetoric. They worship women the same as leftists do, they will never hold them responsible for anything.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 06:23 PM
1

It's how they are. They use equality bullshit to demand everything of high level but don't want any hardships or low level shit. That's left to the men.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 05:00 PM
8

Because muh protect women for birthrate. South Korean women don't have kids though. So that's pointless.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 04:59 PM
13

True enough.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 06:54 AM
4

No, we have news article where they state that women want men who earn then them and thus have higher status then them and said article blames men for not meeting women's requirements.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 05:35 AM
108

He will likely never be able to escape the stigma. Unless he moves states.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 04:31 AM
2

Indeed. But all of society and family itself enforces that men can't hit a woman. Its why they act so boldly cause they know this very well.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 06:49 AM
8

Its not rising. Whats rising is men finding out the truth by DNA tests. Its always been a thing. A newspaper some years ago even states that Paternity testing is bad cause it takes away Women's right to thumb their noses at the Patriarchy by hiding the true parentage of their kids and who they choose to father said kids even if this means hiding it from their husbands.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 03:25 AM
2

Its needed and is good. Cause it gives chance for fathers and kids to bond in the early years.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 11:56 PM
3

Indeed. They at least don't do the double face of toxic masculinity and open up only to laugh in our faces. It's why I'm partial to them. I'm just saying that ultimately both sides worship women.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 11:35 AM
5

Thanks. The only coexistence men's rights and feminism can have is stalemate where they are stuck in a situation where neither side can overcome the other but such a situation is fragile and not permanent or sustainable on a long term. Inevitably someone will gain the upper hand or get ideas to try and crush the other side.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 10:04 AM
6

Yes. You're correct. I explain this in detail here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/bUB4iINcil
/r/MensRights24/01/24 08:41 AM
3

Yes. But don't think for a second that the right wing are any different. Both worship women.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 08:36 AM
1

Ah so going with the cause I question you I'm bothered part. Just stop wasting time and call me an incel buddy and be done with it. Now discussing your contradictions, you do call people incels. Anyone who downvotes the poster you were replying to which could be people posting on here is by your own words an incel. That's what I find funny. You make big dog and pony show of you're only incel if you say your incel but you do then say yeah people who downvote you or disagree with you are incels. A…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:41 AM
0

I can agree with you in it being abusive and so on. The reason I see it as gendered is cause the women are complaining and society agrees with this and shames men for it. I don't mind the shaming for instances where a man has a family and wastes all the money on stupid shit instead of said family. But a man should be able to indulge himself to his own money every now and then within reason without being shamed for it. Nevermind those men who are single but still get shamed despite having no fami…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:35 AM
1

No You yourself called everyone in this post an incel. You are correct, but again the incels will just downvote you. Mens issues will never get any mainstream recognition when all people want to focus on is woman hating and irrational self pity. I'm not bothered. I just find your hypocrisy hilarious. You talk about irrational nature of women but all your posts default to you can't criticize the masters aka women and you can't do anything about their behavior cause we just can't and just have to …
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:25 AM
2

I don't trust them. I think they're just grifters.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:19 AM
1

First, I wish to apologize as I mistook you for another person. A person who agreed with what I'm saying but said it doesn't matter cause they fundamentally dont care cause they're a troll. I will post an example in this very post. Yeah I noticed this too. In all the hobby groups I’m in there’s a common trope of “my wife won’t let me ____” or “how to explain to my wife about this purchase”. I experienced it too with some exes, didn’t matter that I was paying all the bills and doing most of the h…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:16 AM
2

Pathetic. You don't have any argument and just default that isn't I don't understand, I don't understand or feigning ignorance or it doesn't apply to me so it never happens. Just call us all incels and stop wasting our time.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:09 AM
1

Telling the truth is being an incel. Great.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:07 AM
2

You yourself acknowledged that women demand all money goes to her in relationships. Why does it not happening to you mean anything? Is everybody you?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:03 AM
6

Even the call women out for not having kids as died out and instead men are blamed for it.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 05:07 PM
3

Good for you. Doesn't mean anything on grand scale which is what I'm discussing. And I have this anecdote by another poster in this thread. Yeah I noticed this too. In all the hobby groups I’m in there’s a common trope of “my wife won’t let me ____” or “how to explain to my wife about this purchase”. I experienced it too with some exes, didn’t matter that I was paying all the bills and doing most of the housework, spoiling her with dates and gifts whatever. Anything I did for myself was criticiz…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 05:02 PM
2

And this is defeatist talk. You are basically defaulting to giving women what they want anyway. Cause maybe you are able to ignore them but they control society and society does what they want and makes future men obey such women and society molds said men into what women demand. So male behavior is changed but we can't do that to women.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 03:27 PM
8

Yes. Men's hobbies are shat on constantly.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 02:14 PM
20

Men who have families like to buy some stuff for themselves every now and then if able to but the wife complains about it. It's the oldest trope. It's a thing that does happen. If there are no kids at all, the women still complains cause the issue is not the money being spent. It's being spent on himself. It should go to the woman even if they are married and will not have kids.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:54 PM
5

What can she use the sperm for seeing as she is 62 years old? She can't have a baby. Does she plan to have a surrogate have the baby?
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:50 PM
9

That person is a troll pretending to be above it all and not caring and that OP's pov is nonsense when their own post shows that they are lying cause they can't help themselves to use shaming language of women and society proving OPs point.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:47 PM
17

Cause the women's viewpoint is spouted by media and society used to shame men and the male viewpoint is irrelevant and means nothing cause it's misogynistic. Never mind that OP is showing that women feel entitled to a man's money in this manner "Woman's money is her own and her partner's money is also her's" You agree with the this pov but try and hide it with muh doesn't matter. Just admit that you are fine with women's pov of things. I'd actually respect you for that.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:43 PM
9

And there we get to the heart of why you're here. You're just a troll. So stop pretending with the I don't care bullshit and trying to be above it all when that's not true at all. You obviously do care as otherwise you wouldn't be here and continuously spouting muh angry. That what I'm saying. Now moving past that, why does it matter what OP is saying? Cause its spouted by the media and society who back up women's complaints. Which leads to men just spending the money on whatever women want even…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:37 PM
25

No. OP's point is based on reality. You just don't care cause it says something about women which you can't countenance. You even admit that women complain about men spending habits and men complain about women spending habits but we both know whose side society is on but you ignore this.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:18 PM
9

No, why do you care so much if what's being posted here as no relevance and means nothing? You seem to care a lot to bother posting.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:13 PM
33

A man complains but his complaints are ignored by society as being misogynistic and he has no power anyway. A woman's complaint is accepted by society and is spouted by the media to shame men. But that requires you to understand what the OP is actually talking about rather then being a troll.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:04 PM
26

No they do. They complain about men being gamers or men spending money on gadgets or man caves or whatever. The only acceptable purpose of that money is to go to the woman and what she wants.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 11:58 AM
1

You can dress it up all you want but what we get shown is fat women and armpit hair some feminist doesn't want to shave plus ridicule of short men as shown in the OP. And yeah thin men are not seen as manly as shredded men. Is what it is.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 01:00 PM
1

And we have YouTube videos of women saying no to fat men just as anecdotal as your anecdote. Your point? All media about body positivity is about fat women or women not shaving rather then fat men. You and I know why but you pretend otherwise with muh good personality. And no thanks seeing as people die cause of that.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 12:29 PM
1

I'm thin. I don't give a fuck and think body positivity is bullshit proven by how apparently fat positive influencers have been dying. But stop lying. People ridicule fat men and women won't date such men. I'm just telling it how it is. Body positivity is just more women trying to force society to approve of what you do without consequences. And society goes along with it cause it exists to cater to women and how they're feeling today.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 12:06 PM
7

Basically, feminists have decided that women should be able to be attractive, wear what they want, be sexy and get all the benefits of male attention but not TOO much attention! What you fail to understand is that they don't want male attention from the men that they don't find attractive. The men they call creepy and ick. Those men can get a look but they must pay the woman for it hence only fans. Outside of that, they hate it.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 06:21 AM
3

They are not talking about you or your colleagues. They are talking about Chad who they consider Men.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 05:59 AM
25

They legit don't care.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 04:00 AM
25

The man was creepy and ick cause the woman finds him not attractive.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:42 AM
2

They don't care. There is this YouTube video of a woman having a standard of a man that when calculated is like 0.049% or something like that.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 01:48 PM
33

True enough.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 07:07 AM
4

They aren't in denial. They just don't care.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 05:56 AM
6

Feminists are not able to consider more than one idea at a time. No. They just don't care. Why would you care about the suffering of your oppressor? Feminism see's men as oppressors so they should suffer.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 05:54 AM
531

Because body positivity is only meant for women.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 04:16 PM
2

The OP is talking about the fandom though and what they are doing. Not the characters.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 02:16 PM
5

You're welcome. I got it from YouTube.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 11:04 AM
7

Ah but it's ok when they do it when the attraction is superstar men band members. It's very simple. Anything that doesn't interest a woman is seen as lame by them and hence lame by society as well.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 10:28 AM
39

Yes. But she still feels that men/patriarchy has made her a victim cause she is a woman.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:20 AM
132

Schrödinger's feminism: a woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most...
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:03 AM
3

For those who don't know what Hazbin Hotel and Helluva boss is, it's an adult animated series made by a YouTuber.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 08:02 AM
29

Yes. Equality is a trojan horse to cover what they really want which is Domination.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 07:00 AM
2

Sure but if you just say it the way you did all one gets is white knights and don't generalize. The article they can't do that.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 05:04 AM
8

You don't have any nuance. Don't pretend you do. Your position is I just defend women. My entire post is women lose libido and interest in their partners sexually as time passes in marriage. You yourself acknowledge this. That's all my position requires. It's the article that has a women bring up open relationships, not me. I just quoted it. But I quoted many things. The only comment on cheating is about the Netflix thing and I didn't even make the comment. As I said, it's from YouTube. As for y…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 12:49 PM
12

And here we go with the white knight going how dare I besmirch the precious precious women. Read up what I posted, It's all married women losing libido in marriage and long term relationships. Not about cheating. The Netflix thing is more showing that it's a cultural known thing that libido and interests come back towards men not their husband but this is in reference to the article which is the main point of my post. But nah, you can't read and have to whine about muh precious women being besmi…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 12:08 PM
1

Thats why I posted the link about the claim that feminism used to be about equality thing.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 04:48 AM
1

She's a eugenicist too. How can anyone follow her. Watch posts by women when talking about incels. They say that its good for the gene pool that said men can't get women. Women are hypocritical eugenicists. They will happily spout muh good for gene pool when it suits them but then don't put that into practice when it suits them such as having kids with low IQ.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 04:37 AM
1

Its explicit feminist doctrine that male groups must be destroyed. Society and Feminism don't want Men to have their own spaces. The reason why Society doesn't want Men to have their own spaces is cause Femnism plus elites don't want men organizing which requires male groups and spaces so best thing to do is insert women everywhere to destroy said groups. Feminism wants no male groups and spaces cause power hunger as shown below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart In her early c…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 04:24 AM
5

It just be maintenance sex at most. But that is the same as what happened in the past imo. Sex of the past in long term relationships such as marriage was likely a woman putting up with it cause the husband wanted it but herself not caring at all. The ancients had it right. Marriage is purely for kids and throw away thoughts of it being anything else.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 12:20 AM
21

Indeed. This is tied to I forget what its called two something mating strategy.Its so blatant now that even an apparent leftist can see it. ​ Why is it that women look for tall men, men who make "x" amount of money, men who are very confident, even men who have a toned physique? The qualities that attract women sexually are typically not the qualities that women want for a long term relationship. It's also why when relationships fail drastically more often when finances are involved as financial…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 12:06 AM
76

I'm not a man cause I didn't hit her back? Kek, truly fucked no matter what. You don't hit her back, you're not a man. You hit her back, you're an evil man and likely not a true man cause no true man hits a woman.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 11:53 AM
4

True marriages are kind of like student loan debt. It doesnt matter if you fall out of love with the major you studied. Youre still on the hook for the rest of your Yes. True marriage is not about love. It's about duty and responsibility for the sake of children. Love is for a lover you hide from your husband or wife.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 09:10 AM
0

That may play a part but I believe it's down to biology: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/DSwSjj5PlC
/r/MensRights10/01/24 08:45 AM
17

This is known. Monogamy is basically poison to a woman's libido and it's biological. Basically, it seems like we are designed to stay together only enough for the child to grow up enough like 7 years old. But after that we are supposed to separate and find other partners but that runs into the problem of age and society, etc.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 04:06 AM
37

Ah so that's why they're whining, the dreaded incels. You'd think they would be happy with this. The non-chad ick men would no longer try and hit on them finally giving them peace. But then again, that takes away simp money and simp validation.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 09:14 PM
10

You haven't heard of the idea that the elites are interested in depopulation?
/r/MensRights08/01/24 06:24 AM
6

Its actually very simple. Read this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10i3zpm/my_answer_to_posts_about_feminism_is_about/ Elites support this cause it makes men weak and weak men are no threat to them.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 04:40 AM
25

Society and Feminism don't want Men to have their own spaces. The reason why Society doesn't want Men to have their own spaces is cause Femnism plus elites don't want men organizing which requires male groups and spaces so best thing to do is insert women everywhere to destroy said groups. Feminism wants no male groups and spaces cause power hunger as shown below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart In her early career, Gearhart took part in a series of seminars at San Francisco …
/r/MensRights08/01/24 02:54 AM
13

The West exported feminism everywhere which exacerbated the already existing gynocentric nature of humanity that already exists.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 04:55 PM
11

I thought I had made it clear that my post was done in a scathing sarcastic tone via the words. My bad.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 01:25 PM
14

Just to be clear, that part is not how I want things to be. It's how things are. I obviously wish things were different.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 12:51 PM
18

Cause they are seen as failure men and failure men should be silent, support the state and thus women by work and taxes and die quietly. And if they can't do any of the above, it's not said but likely hope that they end themselves without inconveniencing others. Number of incels will continue to rise as men who would have died as cannon fodder in war or come out it with status or changed continue to live. As for why no help? Men deserve no help. They must raise themselves up by their bootstraps …
/r/MensRights05/01/24 11:23 AM
2

True enough.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 09:42 AM
5

You ever notice how leftest women love to say we males ‘objectify their bodies’ and want them naked but the moment they organize to do just about anything as a group: Its simple. The objectification bullshit is about the average male aka the subhuman. He can't have fanservice as thats bad hence objectification.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 02:02 AM
22

Seriously, is nothing sacred enough that they can't just leave it alone and let men enjoy something that's been predominately male centered without adding a feminist anti men spin on it? The answer is no. They did this to LOTR. Everything will be made feminist or destroyed. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 10:36 PM
9

I apologize for my reply being aggressive as others have pointed out that you were agreeing with me.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 12:36 AM
5

You may be right. I will apologize to them for being a tad aggressive.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 12:36 AM
8

I know. Why do you think i say cry in private without anyone around especially women? Maybe OP dearly wants to cry over his parents or whatever's death. Should I tell him to feel nothing? So I say don't do it in public.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 10:16 PM
54

Cry in private where no one can hear you especially women.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 07:19 PM
2

tradcucks btfo. tradcucks can continue shaming men into marriage but the birth rate will continue going down. Cause tradcucks are crypto feminists. They worship women and don't believe women have responsibilities. Only men do. So go ahead tradcucks, continue shitting on men while ignoring women. Nothing will change. The real fault of low birth rate is women but you will ignore this as always.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 10:53 AM
6

It means that the man she is shitting on is a low value male. A subhuman. Thus worthy of derision and shitting on. Just like how creepy for women just means unattractive man who dares to be in her presence.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 07:26 AM
2

Cause thats how it is. For society, any problems women face are things that society needs to fix. Any problems men face is something a man needs to fix on his own and shut the fuck up about. And you will be ridiculed by everyone if you don't this. Especially by those who say open up.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 02:48 AM
1

Sounds more like you just want young men to shut the fuck up as your tired of hearing their words. You do know that you can just mute this subreddit and others and ignore is all right?
/r/MensRights28/12/23 12:24 PM
1

Thats what I have already said. Which is why I said the below: Throw away this unconditional love nonsense. It doesn't exist for men. It's fictional bullshit. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/18s1g06/comment/kf4jg4m/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights28/12/23 03:14 AM
3

Which is why I said the below: Throw away this unconditional love nonsense. It doesn't exist for men. It's fictional bullshit. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/18s1g06/comment/kf4jg4m/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights28/12/23 12:44 AM
8

Thats conditional cause from what you're saying, he was a good father.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 11:57 PM
0

Sure. But I was talking of reality where it does not exist. Not fiction.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 11:50 PM
22

Throw away this unconditional love nonsense. It doesn't exist for men. It's fictional bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 02:32 PM
2

Unconditional love does not exist. It's fictional bullshit. Either accept this or just go full solitude. It's unfortunate but that's just reality.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 05:03 AM
2

Look, get off dating apps and live for yourself.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:29 AM
3

You're talking to a tradcuck. They are feminists even if they don't realize it. They want men to go back to the fields and work even harder but women can do as they like and want without any responsibility. Exactly the same as feminists.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 11:55 PM
1

Does anybody really believe that society benefits if we go to a pure meritocracy and equality in Sports? Because women can't compete in almost ANY sport, and that includes PING-PONG and BILLIARDS! They can only win in a women's style gymnastics competition! That's it! Of all the arguments to use. You default to muh women's sports. I hope women's sports are all ruined personally. Aside from that, tradcons are just feminists to me. tradcons worship women. Women are still free to do what they like …
/r/MensRights21/12/23 10:22 PM
1

That's a new one. You have anymore?
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:00 PM
12

Don't open up. You will be hated either way. Opening up just gives them ammunition and black mail.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 11:38 PM
10

He won the position of becoming her ATM. She got the jackpot though.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:22 PM
4

She choose his money. Not him. And that means nothing as she still got a massive payout which women do divorces for. The path you are promoting leads to dead bedrooms and divorce. Thats fine if you would just stop calling it wining.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:07 PM
11

Correct. This guy thinks woman marries you cause you have money means you're a winner. No. You're a walking ATM.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 11:54 AM
4

They do choose those men. Those men are the ones they desire and really want. They settle down with the men you're talking about cause the men they actually want don't want them. This leads to dead bedrooms. How you can see this is a win I have no idea? Never mind the fundamental problem that women keep seeking to get more money and jobs for themselves ahead of men which leads to less men earning more money hence all those articles of muh poor women have no viable men to marry.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 11:44 AM
1

I know you were being sarcastic. I was just adding that as much as I wish it was like that. It just isn't.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 11:28 AM
16

Sure but again, they don't desire those men. They are basically settling for a paycheck. Is why deadbedrooms becomes a thing. I don't call this a winner. Is just reality but not much wining.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 11:26 AM
3

I wish it wasn't this way but it is what it is.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 11:24 AM
44

They may marry such men but they don't desire him physically. He is what they settle for cause the masculine man wouldn't pick them. They desire a masculine man who is rich and has resources.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 11:14 AM
23

I consider that being liars and hypocritical.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 10:32 AM
193

It's very simple. They hate on masculine men and want men to not be masculine cause that creates weak men who won't oppose them when they grasp for more power but at the same time cause of biology, want to fuck masculine men. It's the same problem where women want more and more money and jobs but at same time complain that there are no men who earn more money then them for them to date and marry.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 10:10 AM
10

Agree with you. Outside of here, men simp for women and protect them no matter what even as they claim more and more power and push men down. Biology/Evolution cursed us so. I don't believe women were ever at the bottom of the hierarchy tho. I think they were always at the top and kept there by men's protection and provision. Well its why I say perceive in the following: Feminism is all about Women rising up from what they perceive as a position where Men were above them and oppressed them. Perc…
/r/MensRights11/12/23 01:50 AM
7

I posted the wrong link. I updated my post with the correct link
/r/MensRights10/12/23 11:47 PM
18

We as a species are pretty much incapable of any kind of true equality and that just sickens me. I have come to the same conclusion though it doesn't sicken me. Its just how it is unfortunately. I elaborated about this here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10i3zpm/my\_answer\_to\_posts\_about\_feminism\_is\_about/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights10/12/23 11:29 PM
4

Women quit jobs cause they believe that they get more money from Only Fans. They had a stable job but wanted more money which their job can't give them. Unless your position is that jobs have to ever increase money to fulfill women's desires. Nothing can be changed here.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 11:58 PM
1

Yes. Forget about Women completely and work on losing weight for yourself. Try and find something that you can do that stimulates effort like work or something that can get you a skill
/r/MensRights07/12/23 07:41 PM
6

No. They do what they do to cater to women and demoralize Men as weak men are no threat to them aka no armed rebellions.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 12:35 PM
28

It’s like women want men to be masculine, but not so masculine that they hurt themselves and those around them. Yes. That's the whole bad boy relationship thing in action. They want a bad boy who will not hurt them but is capable and willing to hurt others under their command. This is their sexual preference but bad boys outside of this situation are dangerous cause they can take action via force which women can't really do well hence why you have all public don't be toxic masculinity thing whic…
/r/MensRights04/12/23 02:53 AM
1

It is. Sally Gearhart, the feminist who started the first gender studies programs even states that male only groups are dangerous and shouldn't exist.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 10:15 AM
1

Also, male only groups that built up brotherhood among men have been destroyed.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 02:15 AM
1

lol. Come on. I'm legitimately curious.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 12:15 AM
1

What's your opinion on what I have posted in this post then? I'm just curious.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 08:04 PM
21

Sure but the differences between men and women make it hit different. First, whose to say all those men have wives? So for those with no wives means that they are just fucking the local women something that they don't get from their own country's women. 2nd, an invader fucking a local woman now has aside from conquering your land now conquers your women and emasculates/cucks both you and your ethnic group. Women don't care about this. Either way, their genes survive. This doesn't apply to men.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 10:56 AM
14

Yes.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 10:28 AM
72

Pretty much. The US had it with the Dear John letters or military wives whoring around while the husband is fighting abroad. During an occupation, the women will start sleeping with the invaders. Not rape but consensual sex. They have no loyalty.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 10:18 AM
6

I'm just repeating the theory so you can understand the context the other commenter is operating on. Though women do have dual mating strategy. Basically, they fuck alpha for the genes and then have beta to pay for it.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 12:04 AM
15

The theory that guy you're talking to is talking about is that monogamy came about as a form of control over women and beta males. Basically the theory is that women only want Alpha males. It's their biological imperative. Alpha male however is still just a human and can be overwhelmed and killed by beta males to take the women. Plus no matter how Alpha such a male is, he can't get anything done without the help of the beta males cause he is just one man. So monogamy came into being. Beta males …
/r/MensRights07/11/23 10:44 PM
25

Though there was one guy who said once that since women will never stop being hypergamous that we need to stop affirmative action and instead push men up. Not women.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 10:09 PM
7

Lol. They are left wing men that still have some sense that they can see what's going on around us and be dismayed about it. They don't like feminism or what it has become in their opinion so there is that. Though some among them are fully aware of truths we're talking about but they know that under their paradigm nothing can be done cause female freedom is sacrosanct after all under their own paradigm hence my banning.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 10:04 PM
25

Chad would get one woman when it's time to settle down. But not before then. They just go from one women to the next or keep several at same time with said women being unaware of it.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:14 PM
63

Which is why I said on the left wing male advocate subreddit that male loneliness and sexlessness can't be fixed especially under the liberal paradigm. Cause that paradigm enables all that you mention. I got banned for saying that though. Lol.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:09 PM
2

I would say that while men may not see an un-attractive women, they don't go out of their way to make life miserable for them or take away their things like women do to men they look down on.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 01:10 PM
1

Well that's what the post is saying. It's all about sexual objectification cause that's what they care about and hate the subhuman males ogling them. Only Chad is allowed that. And if they do allow it, it's for sake of their enrichment aka Only Fans.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 12:29 PM
4

Traditionalists literally don't care. They don't care about Men. They see men as something that must be used to maintain society and women. Same as the Left. They just don't engage in muh toxic masculinity talk.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 01:37 AM
348

Yes, I thank you for showing that Feminism is a female supremacy movement fullstop.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:50 AM
1

OP states that he has a GF and has had sex. So he is not personally bothered. He is just worried about his brother cause he feels that his brother is depressed or his brother was open to the OP about being depressed. Ultimately, you can't say that OP's brother is perfectly fine and is truly volcel cause you say so as it ultimately all assuming things going by what OP is saying. My thoughts that I have posted are also just assumptions. We are just posting our opinions on what is going on as per O…
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:47 AM
1

My thought process is simple, if the brother of OP is truly volcel and doesn't care and waiting for a special someone he was open his depression was about his difficulty in getting into a relationship. then why this? Why depression? My original comment was to someone saying that OP is obsessed with this and that bro is perfectly fine being single eve though OP says bro is depressed.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:22 AM
0

Like with people constantly screaming incels online, its perfectly possible to try and not be called incel that you claim that you're a volcel or you're waiting for a special someone when in truth, you're just an incel. Which is what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:09 AM
5

From my own observations, women today want men to pay for sex with them. They use sex as a commodity and service. I refuse to pay for sex with any woman, and women today, and for the last 5 or so years, I've noticed it more and more. I mean marriage is basically this. You're paying them for chance to have sex with them and they to have your kids. All the love and so on is a pretty mask over this fact.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 04:42 AM
7

OP says this though: he was open his depression was about his difficulty in getting into a relationship. So possible the bro is just coping saying its voluntary.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 04:17 AM
4

He has also been brainwashed into being a mysandrist, even claiming having sex with prostitutes means he would "not be a real man, but a mysoginist". he was open his depression was about his difficulty in getting into a relationship. Yeah, he is self hating male. You need to fix this mindset first and then focus on relationship help. Maybe you can even show your mom your pov about the misandry using this and then together you can help your bro out.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 03:50 AM
2

Indeed. I'd hope more can do what you're saying. I agree with you and some men have done this. My posts so far have just been explaining the reality of things. I of course disapprove of them. As for why all men don't refuse? Cause men are not a united group. We don't have an in-group bias. Possibly such things could have been inculcated by male only groups but those got destroyed years ago. All men are inculcated to care, protect women especially wife no matter what. To defer to her, to provide …
/r/MensRights09/06/23 01:38 PM
5

You don't work, you don't eat. This is especially true for men. Women can fallback on the government or family or whatever. Men are screwed. Plus the government and rest of society is there to make sure he gets set straight if he refuses.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 01:22 PM
3

Cause neither the court nor society cares. All they care is that he works, provides to the wife and kid. That's it. His feelings are irrelevant. His family line dying with him is irrelevant. He acts out cause of his feelings? That's what the police are for.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 01:15 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/ModCoord/comments/13xh1e7/an_open_letter_on_the_state_of_affairs_regarding/ ​ From link: Recently, Reddit has significantly increased its API pricing, rendering it increasingly unaffordable for third-party app developers to continue their services. The prohibitive cost threatens to make it difficult to mod from mobile, stifle innovation, limit user choice, and effectively shut down a significant portion of the culture we've all come to appreciate. Indeed, on May 31, 2023…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 03:42 AM
3

You're welcome. As for not wanting to do things for themselves, I'm split on whether it's biological or inculcated by parents and society. We are meant to fulfill the role of protector and provider so we have to do everything for other people's sake less we be ridiculed hence why you see people go and on about men gaming cause why are they gaming instead of working harder for society. Hence why you have situations where men don't want to do things for themselves or they do want to do things for …
/r/MensRights07/06/23 11:38 AM
3

You sometimes have to pick and choose your battles. Focus on those that haven't given up but occasionally try and see if you can push those who have given up to try again. Since you mention that you're helping men around you then maybe those men can be persuaded to help you with what you're doing. A lot of boys have self isolated themselves. Maybe if you know any around you who are like that you could get them out of their isolation and go outside and get involved in groups.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 10:17 AM
2

Well you could help by being a role model to young boys or men who lack father figures or role models. Help guide them to succeed. Men and boys are left to rot to figure out how things work now and have no father's to be good role models
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:53 AM
2

Are you asking like hypothetically what society can do to help men?
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:41 AM
5

There can be no solution cause a solution requires society to do something and society doesn't care about men. Men either help themselves or off themselves or be quiet and work until they die. That is what society expects.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:36 AM
93

It's bullshit just like body shaming. It's all about women breaking away from role so that they can do as they like any time they want and it's ok to be fat and society has to date them, cater to them and call them beautiful. Men however must stick to gender roles or be loser.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 11:54 AM
1

Cause of feminists invasion of gaming.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 06:36 AM
1

And yet they at same time demand that dads be more involved only to recoil when it happens. Its all so tiresome.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 06:33 AM
2

Yes, they will either female reboot things or blackwash reboot things. If you don't like it, then you need to stop supporting Hollywood. Don't watch their shit and don't pay for their shit.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 06:32 AM
5

Correct. These women call themselves anti-feminists or trad women but when the going gets tough, you will see them use feminist won laws against men in divorces or whatever. Best to just assume all women are feminist by default no matter what they say.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:56 AM
1

I suspect that majority are just grifting hence the onlyfans.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:55 AM
2

Not my problem you're retarded. Keep spouting muh definitions and fuck off.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:52 AM
2

Then shut the fuck up on something you know nothing about.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:52 AM
1

BLM also cares about Black people cause they say so cause MUH definitions!!! Even though they buy mansions away from black people but that doesn't matter cause muh definitions and I say so. So clever you are my precious redditor. So smart, a good boy.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:50 AM
1

Muh definitions says I'm right!! Obligatory Katen Straughan speech So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just…
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:44 AM
10

Its futile if you're not Chad or not a beta who is ok with a woman settling for you cause she needs money.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 12:43 AM
2

Keep telling yourself that.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 11:34 PM
1

Sure. But the thing to keep in mind in this discussion is that it's about how it's about decadence aka due to leaving God and having loss of morality leading to decadence renders one weak and unable to challenge outside invaders. That's the standard collapse narrative when people mention decadence which is why I say what I said. Collapse of law and order can lead to civil war which is a whole other situation than what I described above.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 03:32 PM
3

Lol, this has been something they have talked about for years. Gearhart does not base this radical proposal on the idea that men are innately violent or oppressive, but rather on the "real danger is in the phenomenon of male-bonding, that commitment of groups of men to each other whether in an army, a gang, a service club, a lodge, a monastic order, a corporation, or a competitive sport." Gearhart identifies the self-perpetuating, male-exclusive reinforcement of power within these groups as corr…
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:23 AM
1

Geographic component? Explain more please. And I said more likely not that its what will happen. More likely compared to some nomadic manly horde appearing from out of nowhere to conquer the decadent empire.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:16 AM
1

Sure. But you need to understand what that I'm responding to a person whose position is based on the trope that empires fall to decadence and lose their vigour and thus get conquered by outsiders aka nomadic hordes that in the past when they were more virtuous could have easily defeated. Thats what I'm arguing against.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:14 AM
1

The Famous incident that most people who talk about decadence and fall of Empires is in relation to Rome and the invasions it faced by the hordes it faced when it fell.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:12 AM
1

Sure. But how does that apply to the current situation? Remember that the person I'm responding too is talking about the current West and it falling cause of decadence and loss of morals.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:10 AM
1

Unless you think they disappeared into the air for no reason, something clearly happened.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 09:43 PM
1

Well first, the migrants get accepted into the country and become the citizens due to the government accepting them even if the population didn't want them. They then over time take over due to locals dwindling population. That's just replacement but does not do the classic trope of decadent empire weak and ineffectual that gets conquered by strong outsider. Your idea falls more to what I mentioned of possible civil war. There is also the issue that low birth rates is a thing across the world ou…
/r/MensRights01/06/23 04:15 PM
1

What's more likely to happen is civil war destroying a state which just doesn't tie into the trope of weak decadent empire beaten by outsiders cause of loss if morality.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 04:10 PM
5

You mean primacy I presume? And here is the thing, losing primacy does not mean collapse. It just means its no longer in charge. Collapse requires the state to be well collapsed which in ancient times mainly happened when vigorous nomadic warriors overran the decadent empire. That's the issue, who can even do such a thing in modernity with nukes and modern weapons.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 04:07 PM
11

Decadent empires fell to invading nomadic hordes who were not decadent. The problem with this is modernity has destroyed the nomadic warriors and nukes exist.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 03:57 PM
2

Check out the wikipedia article: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybristophilia It being old does not make it untrue and your post illustrates my point. Men must be docile for peaceful society but such a state disgusts women. Hence the paradox
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:30 AM
1

The person you're replying to says that they are female. So it makes sense why they say Light cause he is hot to them cause he's a criminal. To have a peaceful society men must be made docile but women find docile men disgusting. It's a paradox.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 10:54 PM
8

Correct and Based.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 12:13 AM
6

Correct and Based.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 11:22 PM
7

Aka feminism.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 04:41 PM
1

Check this out: https://twitter.com/TheCut/status/1633461602279215104
/r/MensRights26/05/23 02:34 PM
2

Yeah but I think this technology, as usual, will mostly help women. With artificial wombs they can have children without going through pregnancy and all what it implies. I suppose it would also help those men without a partner who want to be dads. This is still probably going to be very expensive and mostly affordable by rich people, Imo. Oh it will help women no doubt about that. But the hope is that it will also help men and that after some time prices go down. Ultimately, there is very little…
/r/MensRights26/05/23 12:56 PM
1

Oh I'm aware. But we can't stop the tech. It's coming regardless and it may be the only option cause nobody will ever make women take responsibility for once for anything. Seriously, this tech development is a blackpill cause of the fact that we'd rather turn to cloning or cutting women our of the equation then trying to hold women accountable or responsible for anything.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 12:46 PM
3

3 or 4 kids is a lot of work and responsibility (and money) specially if the woman is also in the workforce. The world is overpopulated so it's not so worrying yet. I can't blame them for not having more kids. This goes back to a post I made before that Feminism and all its fruits are unsustainable purely cause it leads to low birth rates. And that this cannot be fixed aside from staying with feminism and falling off the cliff which could lead to collapse which ends feminism or values change due…
/r/MensRights26/05/23 12:35 PM
2

Women have the kids. They could choose to have 3 or 4 kids for every woman and birth rate issue solved but they won't.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 12:05 PM
25

That's one women saying it and even she says that the misogyny thing does play a factor. Which ties into the below which is described as a growing movement: https://twitter.com/TheCut/status/1633461602279215104 And what's funny is that your post backs up what I have said before. Money is not the true cause of low birth rates as otherwise poor countries have low birth rates but they don't. The answer is simply women not wanting kids or having few kids for one reason or another. A choice they can …
/r/MensRights26/05/23 07:16 AM
6

spending more time with games and technology than talking to girls and those girls likely don't even like the average guy 🤷 it's probably much worse there in that sense for cultural reasons... Maybe the reason they spend time with games is cause the girls don't want them in the first place? And anyway, Japan has a higher birth rate then South Korea whose women are happily saying NO to marriage, men and children cause the men aren't feminist. As for the artificial womb thing? Its not a Japan thin…
/r/MensRights26/05/23 05:19 AM
1

Based. Do it bro. We need a male group revival.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 01:20 AM
111

Japan has a birth rate higher then South Korea. And South Korean women say no to marriage, kids and men.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 01:17 AM
2

Currently the only legal way to reduce the male population to 10% would be to selectively abort male fetuses. It’s plausible this could happen since we saw first hand a willingness in China during the one child policy years to selectively abort female fetuses, but so far I’m not aware of any data indicating this is a trend. Infact, the intellectual I'm quoting specifies this exactly. Here: On the critical question of how women could achieve this, Gearhart argues that it is by women's own capacit…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 02:15 PM
2

Women fear and want to control men. That's why they want men docile but at the same time their biology betrays them which is why they fuck Chad even though Chad has toxic masculinity. Their heroes in media are toxic masculinity incarnate but is fine when a woman does it. And they say they are afraid of men while trying to take away everything from men, our money, our jobs, our children, our heroes in media. I could go on and on. Fuck em.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 12:45 PM
1

Yes. I know. I just wanted to elaborate more on what's going on with feminism and what "happened" to it.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 10:44 AM
3

She helped found the first women and gender study programs. It's very likely they followed what she wrote to destroy male groups.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 10:19 AM
1

Indeed. If nothing else, it would at least lower down feelings of isolation our fellow men are feeling and could possibly lower down suicides.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 09:12 AM
3

Sure. But whose to say that we can't make those exceptions apply on greater scale or build better groups now that we understand things better?
/r/MensRights25/05/23 08:55 AM
4

Yes. You describe what I think is going on perfectly.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 06:41 AM
2

Good to hear. The video describes how feminism basically laid the foundation for the Ts to rise. Stay strong and ignore all T nonsense.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 06:39 AM
2

I thank you for posting this and I do agree that the future is fitness. As for you being a tomboy, I do have to mention this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/13qvxpq/feminism_is_feminist_gnosticism_new_discourses/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 James Lindsay video that talks about how feminism created the bed for T-thing I'm sure you know about which pretty much destroyed tomboys. Though please, don't do self hate. Be proud of yourself instead.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 06:12 AM
2

Thanks. Will check it out. I do remember him on youtube.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 06:09 AM
3

OOps. I posted the wrong link. This is the one I'm talking about. It explains more about our issues: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10i3zpm/my\_answer\_to\_posts\_about\_feminism\_is\_about/
/r/MensRights25/05/23 05:40 AM
2

Great. Thanks a lot. Will check these out later as I'm at work right now.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 04:15 AM
1

Thanks for this.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 04:10 AM
2

Hopefully.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 04:09 AM
2

Thanks. All these on youtube?
/r/MensRights25/05/23 04:04 AM
6

Do you think that these group biases are innate? If you can change a man's bias from being in-group (which is what she seems to suggest) then couldn't you do the same with women. Well the issue is that according to many studies posted on this subreddit, women have a bias towards each other that is inbuilt whereas men don't. Now can you change the bias women have to each other? I think its possible as we can see how women who have their sons suffer speak out against feminism but its not guranteed…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 04:00 AM
2

I already know of Karen. I will check out Honey Badger Radio live then. Thanks.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 03:37 AM
9

Yes. Male groups bad cause male groups prevent women from having power cause male groups build male solidarity towards fellow men which they don't want. They want men isolated whereas women have inbuilt bias towards each other. Basically, male cannot have a political group but women can have a political group that advocates for their interest. And yes, it causes men to infight and have no community which means more loneliness.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 03:26 AM
13

That's just projection. Understand that they will accuse men of misogyny for anything. How dare you prevent women from taking power?! That's misogyny!! But in all female groups, they love trash talking men. Makes you think now when seeing my OP right?
/r/MensRights25/05/23 03:10 AM
10

Cause Gearhart does not base this radical proposal on the idea that men are innately violent or oppressive, but rather on the "real danger is in the phenomenon of male-bonding, that commitment of groups of men to each other whether in an army, a gang, a service club, a lodge, a monastic order, a corporation, or a competitive sport." Gearhart identifies the self-perpetuating, male-exclusive reinforcement of power within these groups as corrosive to female-led social change It prevents the below: …
/r/MensRights25/05/23 02:43 AM
4

Its explicit in feminist doctrine that male spaces are dangerous. A prominent feminist named Sally Miller Gearhart who helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in the country at a San Francisco University. This is what she had to say:In her early career, Gearhart took part in a series of seminars at San Francisco State University, where feminist scholars were critically discussing issues of rape, slavery, and the possibility of nuclear annihilation. Gearhart outlines a t…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 01:24 AM
42

Because you fail to recognize that they are not about equality. Equality is the lie to cover up the real goal which is supremacy and benefits/privileges for themselves. I explain it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10i3zpm/my_answer_to_posts_about_feminism_is_about/ Summary is: When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 01:05 AM
2

What channels do you recommend?
/r/MensRights24/05/23 11:47 PM
9

It's possible that men could have a bias by constructing male groups where men can build cameraderi and brotherhood but such groups were destroyed by feminism.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 07:08 AM
21

Correct. Creepy just means the woman finds you ugly, unattractive and wants you away from her and not interacting with her. That's all it means.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 07:05 AM
1

Correct. But only on men.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 05:50 AM
2

Ah, My mistake. For some reason I read your post having sarcasm towards me comment which caused confusion. But that was just me.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 05:48 AM
8

Indeed. It's not easy or will be easy but still must be done. If not for us, then for future boys whose situation will be even worse cause society is not opposed at all.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 06:02 PM
9

So we should tell society to fuck off unless your position is that slavery good cause that's what this is. If we're going to be mules for society, we should at least get some thanks and respect rather then denigration
/r/MensRights22/05/23 05:50 PM
8

Yup. That's why this subreddit and similar exist. But I will be frank with you. You will have to toughen up and learn to let the negative portrayal not bother you but at the same time know it's there and work to try and stop it. Cause the negative portrayal is done on societal scale pushed by academia, media, parents, individuals themselves, etc. Aka we are underdogs against entirety of society.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 02:22 PM
1

The problem with provider males is that jobs that they could get are either given to women or outsourced or no longer exist cause automation or outsourced. And with women working, they don't need the men who have nothing but provider role for them to offer women. Hence those men have no women.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 02:15 PM
2

Correct. It's shaming tactics.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 02:11 PM
1

Possible. But so far attempts to pay women to have kids dont seem to have worked but they didn't do full financial support as you are mentioning.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 02:11 PM
1

I already answered your points in this post multiple times with both you and others. You haven't refuted it other then go muh misogyny and muh bigot acting like it will cow me even though I said that I don't give a shit and am not hiding. I see no further need to elaborate my point again and again.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 02:08 PM
62

Because people and society don't want men talking about their issues or acting uppity. They just want men to shut the hell up, work hard, endure what suppression they are doing to men quietly and provide to both society and women. Simple. Basically, men arent allowed to form a political party based on common issue that comes about from sympathy as men banding together in community cause they suffer from teb same issues. But women are allowed to be political and form a political party to advance …
/r/MensRights22/05/23 01:08 PM
2

Lol what? The entire thing of an open relationship is that you still HAVE that relationship. Fucking around with other people becomes just becomes an OPTION not your responsibility. Honestly I have no idea where you’re pulling this stat that open relationships work for women and not men. All the men complaining that they are not getting any action but their wives are. Which when combined with the rate of sexless men paints a bleak image for the men. As for the relationship, its basically just pe…
/r/MensRights22/05/23 04:59 AM
6

What do you mean? I know why they divorce so much. Cause there are no repurcussions. Only upsides and they can just find new partners anytime they want.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 03:09 AM
11

The truth is very simple. Are you Chad? or Are you rich? If yes, you can for the most part ignore all these rules as women want you. if no, then those rules apply to you as you are unwanted.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 02:24 AM
1

Correct. He is provider but not Alpha that they actually wanted.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 12:14 AM
10

If that's the case then I don't think it's at all reasonable to expect a man to dedicate his life and work to her, I think it would/should be acceptable for people to switch partners when they feel they need to (either because she's bored of having sex with him, or because he's tired of being told "no sex"). The issue is that Open Relationships simply doesn't work for average men. It works for women but not men. The man is basically back to singlehood and needing to find a partner and we already…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 11:59 PM
11

It's apparently biological. Here: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/women-get-bored-sex-long-term-relationships/582736/
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:53 PM
1

Correct.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:49 PM
21

Hey no need to be ashamed of your gender. We don't want or wish to encourage self hatred here. Relax.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:48 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:45 PM
1

Even so. They have lower income for other things that are required but push through unlike richer income where they have income but never use it for kids. I posted an anecdote in regards to my own family. Poor family with wife not having a job other then helping husband has 11 kids. Her kids are richer, have property and businesses then their parents but have only 1 or 2 kids or 0 kids. Developing country that's pretty westernized.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:34 PM
1

The problem is people in poor countries have multiple kids. This is very well known. It's rich countries that have low birth rate.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:24 PM
1

Yup. Things will change one way or the other but they will change.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 05:45 PM
1

Which is why I have seen people say that societal collapse is the only way to fix birth rates barring artificial wombs. I can see the logic. The person who has to sign the bill to dismantle the welfare system, remove women from the workplace, and ban contraception It may be possible to keep the welfare system but the other things cannot be avoided. People think I mean the kill all men types when I talk feminism but Im talking even more broadly when I say feminism. Women having access to contrace…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 05:22 PM
1

I never said that it would. Just that society will have to make a decision eventually of either we find a way to make artificial wombs work or well women have to have kids or die out/be replaced. It may not like the fact it has to make a decision but it will have to make one cause it has no choice. Depending on immigration just creates its own issues and it doesn't fix anything cause those migrants eventually have low birth rates too and the countries they come from are also slowing down in birt…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 05:02 PM
1

It's a movement and other feminists comment to the tweet and their posts are damning.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:25 PM
1

This proves my point. And families of the past had larger amounts then they do today. Again, my grandmother on my mother's side had 11.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 01:22 PM
1

Hence why I say that one way or another, the issue will have a resolution. And largely? Men are expected to work to support culture and society or is loser and expected to die to defend society. But don't you dare ask women to uphold their responsibility is your post. So it's more correct to say women are free to do anything and everything but men must shoulder the burden. Even the blame for low birth rates.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 01:15 PM
8

Based and correct. I focus on feminism cause as you point out. They did have an effect on their own and things could have been better despite capitalism doing what it does but they refuse to do anything but well do what they have done. And people are far far to eager to not put blame on women and instead blame literally anyone but women.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 07:27 AM
2

Its that and other reasons like women focus on career and by the time they want kids, its too late or they choose to stay childless cause whatever reason or cause they can't find a partner they consider worthy, etc.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:57 AM
13

I think we'd rather let society fall if that were to be the result instead. I think humanity will be in for some real hard lessons because of that attitude though. There are feminists who have this viewpoint: https://twitter.com/TheCut/status/1633461602279215104 Basically to hell with men and to hell with the nation and culture. Really makes you think. They can suppress the conversation all they want, the issue won't go away. It will be solved one way or another either societal collapse and the …
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:46 AM
22

Power. I will post a thread I made about this. But my argument can be simplified to this statement from a famous scifi series: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10i3zpm/my_answer_to_posts_about_feminism_is_about/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 05:50 AM
11

Hypergamy sure plays a role but there are women who focus on career until they suddenly want kids but its too late and thats not hypergamy but choice and wanting career which feminism encouraged. And then you have these women in regards to Korea: https://twitter.com/TheCut/status/1633461602279215104
/r/MensRights21/05/23 05:49 AM
24

Aka feminism. People want to make all sorts of excuses about money when thats just false. They don't want to confront the truth
/r/MensRights21/05/23 05:38 AM
-1

While it is true, does that imply your solution would be to tank women's education and their access to careers? If you want to fix the birth rate without resorting to artificial wombs which I'm sure feminists will fight against, then yes. But why are you framing it like I want to do anything? I'm just speaking truth. I have no power to do anything. Like it or not, thats the facts. No, the documentary presents another cause for that. The cause being the difficulty of bring financially secure, whi…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 05:36 AM
1

Its easy to see what causes it. The more education and options to control birth for whatever reason women have and this all comes with economic development, the birth rate craters. Education plays a role cause it leads to feminism and women wanting career instead of staying at home and having kids. Countries with low economic development or no freedom for women, the birth rate doesn't crater. And South Korea has worse birth rate then Japan and here is what Feminists in Korea has to say: https://…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 04:21 AM
9

The issue is that many men are blinded by limerence of romance and bluepilled indoctrination by society that they foolishly put themselves into situations where they get screwed. The ancients had it right. Just make the thing a legal agreement for the purpose of raising children instead of treating it as if its romantic or love based and be done with it.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:58 AM
3

That's cause they're retarded. As soon as your wife even hints to it, you should bail. Cause it means she is already either cheating on you or planning to do so but wants to make it not cheating by polyamory. But heh, they are blue pulled and blinded by love or wanting to keep the marriage. Shrug
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:36 AM
3

My only agreement is that feminism does not seek equality and polyamory is just public cuckolding. That's pretty much it. I don't care about BDSM. Should have clarified. My bad.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:26 AM
3

My post didn't even address or say anything about BDSM. It's about feminism. BDSM is just a kink or fetish.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:18 AM
1

Ah, not exactly. My post is saying birth rate is low cause of feminism and how it changes culture and society but that instead of people acknowledging this and have women accept accountability. Men will be blamed. As for Korea that I was talking about. Here https://twitter.com/TheCut/status/1633461602279215104 My apologies. There were errors that I didn't notice until you replied. Phone tapping is a pain
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:06 AM
1

Indeed. You're correct
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:02 AM
9

Since you are a woman, can I have your opinion on this post of mine, if you don't mind? There are feminists on twitter who when talking about South Korea are perfectly happy to say that birth rate is low and will go lower aka no population cause the men are not feminist and thus bad and that Korea deserves this aka its a good thing. Maybe having women take some responsibility for this means I'm le bad instead of blaming men who we all know the government and society will blame for the low birth …
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:49 AM
18

The guy comes up with strawman. I simply say that yeah, feminism lowers birth rate means that I want forced breeding aka putting words in my mouth. I never said that. There are feminists on twitter who when talking about South Korea are perfectly happy to say that birth rate is low and will go lower aka no population cause the men are not feminist and thus bad and that Korea deserves this aka its a good thing. Maybe having women take some responsibility for this means I'm le bad instead of blami…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:45 AM
10

I don't hide my pov. I am anti-feminist. I don't care about being called misogynist. And I am here for my fellow men cause men's rights will never advance as long as feminism is allowed to run amock unopposed. And its less that men have a right to breed them and more that this is the consequence of women having freedom. Simple as. Just accept it and stop lying. Be brave. There are people on twitter who happily admit that they are perfectly fine with countries having no population cause freedom f…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:25 AM
21

Womens education and access to reproductive health is part of feminism so you basically are backing me up. Thanks. And I frankly don't care about women anything. Fuck em. Women have feminism for what they want. I'm a man and here for my fellow men.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:10 AM
22

Never watched it but if thats what it says, then its correct. There are articles that basically say this but that its good or we have to accept it cause female freedom. Is what it is.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 01:58 AM
1

I never said otherwise. I just don't think that free market means that they don't have power. They will always have power and do bad shit. Democracy is unfortunately a lie. We have always been ruled by oligarchs one way or another. Just the current ones are of the merchant class which is made up of corpos and heads of NGO's.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 12:55 AM
2

Ah, you're a troll. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 12:50 AM
2

Which doesn't solve the problem cause those migrants will then have birth rate issues themselves and the importation just creates political problems and ethnic tensions and crime rises such as rapes. And the issue is that birth rate is slowing down across the world. So this plan simply does not work long term even if we ignored the political, ethnic and crime issues.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 12:49 AM
8

If you do passport bro move, never bring her back to your country cause what will happen is that they will go feminist or well leave you cause they now have citizenship. Stay in the country you met them in.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 12:27 AM
1

Then there is also the issue that entertainment franchises like Star Wars have been despoiled and humiliated for the sake of muh feminism.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 12:10 AM
1

Correct. Though it doesn't matter what system is in place, they always do that.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 12:04 AM
0

Well birth rate is imploding across the world except for certain regions and there are news articles that are very truthful in blaming it on Feminism but that its a good thing cause muh women freedom.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 12:02 AM
2

Have you not seen how they emasculate all the male heroes for the sake of empowering women? But thats just us being hysterical and is misogynistic to point out. /S
/r/MensRights20/05/23 11:45 PM
1

Cause they are dupes and retards. The Socialism they preach has been coopted by the Oligarchs and Capitalists aka elites who are using them for their own ends. And elites want men weak cause men being weak means no resistance against them.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 10:35 PM
9

Yes. Cause it's clearly not about healthy at any size for men. Nobody accepts that or cares and to be frank I think that's good cause healthy at any size is stupid. I want my fellow men to be healthy. But it's an example of how everything is about female power.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 05:36 PM
4

You are right, but they shut up if you pay for their Only Fans, they will even dress as waifus and act as sexual slaves if you pay enough. The poor guys are fucked though, they will soon have to be happy with some sad Pornhub video where he watches a guy with a huge dick fuck a petite woman, like a behaved cuck. Indeed. I feel sorry for those guys. They shouldn't pay those sluts and whores. They hate those men and those men pay them to be hated on. It's insane. Better to save that money for when…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 04:07 PM
9

I say modern religions. I'd think most religions in the past had the same attitude about women. Consider the bible and Eve.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 03:04 PM
14

go home masturbate to the porn that some of them sell us, and let the cool guys do the party. If only. They also police us there. Look at what they did to video games, movies, comic books, anime and manga.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:21 PM
15

Correct. But my point would still stand as they are still disgusted with you even if you're rich. They just ignore that disgust cause money.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 11:54 AM
26

They are actually triggered negatively though. It's just that the reason why they are triggered is cause men they consider abhorrent are looking at them with sexual interest. If the man doing the same act was one they find attractive, they are fine with it. So basically, only Chad which is a minority can look at them. Rest of us should be eunuchs who only work.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 11:43 AM
7

Correct.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 11:40 AM
50

girls want gentle shy guys. Kek, this is gaslighting. They did this to control you and other young men. Notice how they fuck the men who ignore this teaching. It's not your fault. Society wants men to be meek cause that means controlled and docile men that will not be a threat to it.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 11:39 AM
115

That's the thing. Patriarchy that women scream controls society is just them projecting what they are doing and what they want to do.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 09:52 AM
36

Correct.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 09:45 AM
17

If I were to point to a group of people trying to "normalise" kink, it wouldn't be feminists ... They do normalize stuff like that as seen by Only fans good, sexy women in video games bad.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 07:03 AM
139

Feminism is a female supremacy movement. Fullstop. Simple as.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 05:45 AM
1

Man, people will downvote for making political points or well for any reason. It's just something you have to learn to ignore. If it bothers you so much, don't make political posts and instead post animals being cute or being saved or funny posts. Guaranteed upvotes. And suppress you? I'm not a mod. I don't have any such power
/r/MensRights18/05/23 04:40 PM
2

No such thing as apolitical feminism. Its a movement that seeks to rise women up the hierarchy which requires pushing men down and is thus political by nature cause the hierarchy is political as well. I go into further detail here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10i3zpm/my\_answer\_to\_posts\_about\_feminism\_is\_about/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights18/05/23 05:36 AM
2

I believe that what you're saying is how it used to be for the West. Japan and China both have words for such leftover women.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 11:06 AM
1

I would understand this double standard if women at least had kids but the birth rate is down every where meaning that they can't even do that but they are still given everything whereas everything is demanded of men. It's what drives me up the wall.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:39 AM
2

Fucking simp slave. If this is your argument, then I presume you have no issue with slavery cause they should be happy about it as they are heroes right?
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:20 AM
3

This is so obvious it makes me mad, they like players and think most men have something to do with it so they can do the same. Thats because they only care about those men cause those men are the men that they care about. Rest of maledom is invisible or hated by them
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:34 AM
26

Turning? Its been like that for a long long time.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 06:37 AM
1

Interesting. Maybe create a post about this showing what you are mentioning and how it relates to my own post. We need to wake up our fellow men.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 06:21 AM
2

Can I have your opinion on this thread of mine? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10i3zpm/my_answer_to_posts_about_feminism_is_about/ Its related someone to leadership and thus your post.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 05:56 AM
2

Correct. I expound about why Feminism is like this cause some posters say that feminism got corrupted. I disagree. Its not cause Feminism got corrupted. It was the logical endpoint. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10i3zpm/my_answer_to_posts_about_feminism_is_about/ What do you think?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 05:13 AM
2

But they won't. They want both states at once. They have agency but also are victims when convenient.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:40 AM
6

Its an excuse to cover for women. Nobody accepts evolutionary arguments when it comes to Men. Its only acceptable for women.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:16 AM
1

Then take away pushing women into education and high positions and only men should have access to it. Problem solved. But I suspect that despite you making your argument, you won't like my solution.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:15 AM
6

I don't care. Women suffer consequences of their actions for once. To hell with them.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 10:41 PM
1

I haven't read the study but I speculate that it's due hypergamy of I can do better plus I'm still young so I want to explore and be free mixed with divorce being favorable to women. I have seen online discussion that autism is due to women and men having kids at older ages which if true means more and more autistic kids.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 12:22 PM
24

So women are more and more picky, unpleasant and entitled but "women most affected". Got it, pal. Thanks for the epiphany. All of society operate under the paradigm of you can't say women lower their standards as thats controlling women and is bad and women having standards is good. So yes, women most affected always. They would just scream incel if this was about men not having partners but when it comes to women, we must be worried. what bs.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 03:39 AM
2

By leaning into your senses, I mean really paying attention and enjoying what your body is doing. Being mindful and shit. As for sensation, ever took a really deep breath, felt your insides really tense up on inhale, and your body shiver when you exhale? There's a natural high or sensation produced in that process similar to exercising, running, or masturbating. It's strangely relaxing yet stimulating. Maybe I'm talking a bunch of nonsense, but I have yet to feel post-nut despair while jerking i…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 03:25 AM
1

I will reply in a bit. Thanks. Away from my computer.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 03:14 AM
5

it’s also unrealistic showing women with impossible figures and men with extreme size. This can lead to a false assumption to what women and men should look like and can show impossible sexual situations which can be a gateway drug to more extreme kinks But thats not degrading or objectification of anyone though. Which is what you said it does. Could the things you mention happen? Possible. But the same thing can happen regardless of porn via body positivity feminism pushes which is fat is healt…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:55 AM
3

Indeed. This coming from the muh experts. Thats the problem with believing the experts. They are not infallible and thus will fall to their biases and ideologies.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:37 AM
5

How come though? There is no abuse here as no actual person is being objectified or abused. Though just to be clear, I don't believe in objectification. Thats a feminist talking point. But I wil not argue about that for the sake of this discussion.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:35 AM
13

Far fewer is bs. Many articles talk about how women still want men who earn more then them. And of course, the ever think of the poor women who don't have partners.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:28 AM
35

As has been said many times on here, people/society believe that if a man does something wrong or he suffers, he needs to go to jail or suffer. Whereas a woman does something wrong or suffers, society will make a thousand excuses for her and move to help her. Men are seen as having agency. Women don't and instead are eternal victims of circumstance.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:04 AM
6

A question, what do you think of people who masturbate to comic book characters or comission drawings of fake characters. Does this still degrade women and men?
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:51 AM
3

The hell does leaning into your senses and sensation mean in this case? I'm really curious. And I presume that your goal would then be to get rid of imagination porn as well seeing as you say that its a first step.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:50 AM
3

So imagination porn then? I would think if you are truly porn free, you wouldn't be saying this cause its still porn.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:20 AM
1

Ok. Wasn't asking for your sex life. But I will take this as basically you not being a tradguy. Basically, the reason I asked what I asked is tradcons have this idea that men must sacrifice for women no matter what. And your post which is basically won't someone think of the women in a sub that's about male issues gave me that impression
/r/MensRights06/05/23 12:23 PM
0

A question, are you a traditionalist?
/r/MensRights06/05/23 03:29 AM
2

A woman on here admits that yes its done for good reason and men need to be controlled for bad behavior but nah, I'm mistaken and delusional one cause you say so. You don't even understand that the use of predatory is deliberate to create a sense of danger and exploitation involving women and thus something that needs to be fixed.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 12:45 AM
5

Agreed. But she hasn't said anything obnoxious to me plus her comment just made it easier for me to make my point.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 04:11 PM
14

Just saw your new edit. Fair enough.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 10:41 AM
27

Lol, so I post articles and talk about an actual tv show called sex life where a woman is shown as a heroine for cheating on her husband who knows bout her lust for her bad boy ex and this emotionally breaks him. But I'm the one with tunnel vision. lol
/r/MensRights05/05/23 10:34 AM
41

No they aren't. There are tv shows celebrating it and I have posted articles in this post saying let women cheat for Christmas and monogamy is hard for women with no condemnation whereas I know that if they were talking about men, there would be condemnation. And society says that women who lie about rape should not be punished as it's causes women to be discouraged to report real rape. A guy recently killed himself because of a false accusation.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 10:14 AM
45

And there we go. You act as if you are somehow defeating my point when all you're doing is proving it. Thanks for that. Now ignoring that, sure men who cheat, lie and use women should be shamed but so should women who do the same such as with paternity fraud or cheat on men or lie to men
/r/MensRights05/05/23 10:02 AM
52

And that still fits completely fine with my point of it simply women shaming and controlling men as always.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 09:57 AM
29

Which is fine. Nobody here is saying you have to date older men. Just that we see this as shaming and controlling of men cause that is what it is from our perspective cause the opposite is perfectly fine. And if you find older women dating younger men bad, then I salute you for your integrity.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 08:06 AM
9

Then my post doesn't apply to you.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:48 AM
44

Yes. I know. Because pushed by Feminism. Whats your point? Everything will be called creepy and muh pedo by your side to push up age that men are allowed to date. Wouldn't surprise me that 20s will be called children and thus you can date only 30s which is very convenient for older women.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:47 AM
3

I thought women can do everything? Why not hire them to fill the gap.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:27 AM
7

So yeah, I'm not spouting bullshit. Its the media pushing things and media being a power in society means society pushes it.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 06:25 AM
10

The other article: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/women-get-bored-sex-long-term-relationships/582736/
/r/MensRights05/05/23 06:23 AM
13

Sure. I never said otherwise but again, you get name called. Men get that too plus hyseria of muh grooming and muh pedo. And the article I talk about: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/men-should-give-wives-permission-infidelity-christmas/ I don't have the other one I talk about at the moment as I'm at work
/r/MensRights05/05/23 06:18 AM
28

Sure. But society doesn't care. They celebrate women being promiscuous and shame men about not wanting promiscuous women. They call you insecure and little boy for doing that. Articles that basically say women should be allowed to cheat as its hard being monogamous for them due to biology but men of course are allowed no such luxury. Compared to that you have this everything is pedo hysteria.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:57 AM
19

Men have no power to do that. Its called being controlling and insecure and men being sexist. Unless I misunderstand what you're saying.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:26 AM
412

Its a shaming action pushed by Women to control Men. They are angry that the men they want don't want them and look at younger women hence this hysteria.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:06 AM
2

And there we go. Thank you for proving my point. People like you love making this evolution argument and thus nothing can be done but only when it comes to women. Men need to change. So yeah fuck off with your evolution argument. Copy Paste fuckers like robots. And also a fucking troll as well.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:25 AM
2

Then take away pushing women into education and high positions and only men should have access to it. Problem solved. But I suspect that despite you making your argument, you won't like my solution.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:11 AM
4

Creepy simply means that women find him unattractive and subhuman and don't want to interact with that male and want him to go away. That's literally all it's about.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 02:07 PM
4

I believe cognitive dissidence is the technical term. Just that redpillers call it the hamster. It is a funny image though the word brings up. Good comment though.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 06:17 PM
9

What's truly galling to me is that society does all this shit for women but they fail to give back anything in return like having kids. I could at least understood why society simps for them if they had kids. But they don't and we men will be blamed for this.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 04:13 PM
7

Based.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:44 PM
14

And society also plays along with this insanity. No matter if said society is left leaning or right leaning. Women do something bad? Must be the fault of the men around her or circumstances or patriarchy. Man do something bad. He is trash and it's his fault.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:40 PM
16

Redpill calls it hamster The rationalization hamster is an analogy for the thought processes used by women to turn bad behavior and bad decisions into acceptable ones to herself and her friends. When a woman makes a bad decision, the hamster spins in its wheel (the woman’s thinking) and creates some type of acceptable reasons for that bad decision. The crazier the decision, the faster the hamster must spin in order to successfully rationalize away the insanity. Or an example to better explain th…
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:26 PM
21

Correct
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:16 PM
53

And why there is shaming about older men and younger women pairings even when both are adults.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:14 PM
23

Based post. I'm glad people are waking up.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:05 PM
31

Equality is just a Trojan horse or smokescreen to supremacy.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:22 PM
14

Correct. 100% correct.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:19 PM
30

This idea of we can have equality and 50-50 simply doesn't work. It just leads to women whining about no good men around and for the man, they are left either with low paying job or no job and no women and thus are seen as subhuman by society
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:18 PM
89

Because those women want men that earn higher then them and have high job status but with men not going to university that's not possible. So women don't have men they want which means that they are suffering. Whereas if a men didn't have women they want, they are dirty incels.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:09 PM
136

Creepy just means that the man giving the compliments is a subhuman cause she finds him unattractive hence he is creepy.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 02:34 AM
4

I will make sure to leave it up then.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 11:19 PM
7

Good.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 04:58 AM
2

It is not that I see it as a solution, but that I see it as a logical consequence of what can happen in the face of a great problem that looms over Western societies, and that is the low birth rate, that in the medium-long term, it can only be solved with a kind of moral social regulator (call it religion) or the gradual replacement of the population by immigrants or some kind of hybridization between immigrants and local population and in both cases, I do not believe that the current model can …
/r/MensRights24/04/23 07:50 AM
12

They will marry the short rich guy but will never sexually desire him. They want to fuck and desire the tall, handsome, hung and muscular guy. They may every try and have a kid with the Chad and pass it off as the kid of the short rich guy.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 07:37 AM
1

Interesting. Though I disagree with your point here: Nothing can be done. You say this but then state that you see religion fixing this mess. So something can be done. I approve that you are able to see the problem that of women having freedom means that society and men will be in decline. Many are simply not able to realize this fact or realize it and try and ignore it cause it goes against their ideology
/r/MensRights24/04/23 07:28 AM
1

A question, more and more men are sexless. Whereas its not that way for Women. What happens if majority of men are seen as substandard by women? What is to be done?
/r/MensRights24/04/23 07:00 AM
1

Incels in the past likely died in Wars or via the Wars got Women.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:44 AM
13

You already know the answer. You just don't want to face it. They don't love their husbands. They are not sexually attracted to him. He is a provider they find useful.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:38 AM
1

Good. Nothing important to Men was lost.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:06 AM
5

It was stated by a feminist who helped start the first gender studies that male only groups are dangerous cause it keeps women away from power.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:56 PM
3

Based post. I don't think I can do these things myself as I don't have the capital. But Based post nonetheless.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:40 PM
3

Indeed. Which is why my post can be boiled down to "Don't listen to the bs spread by society and don't open up. But if you must, don't open up to women."
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:47 PM
0

Which is why I even said if you must open up. My position is not open up, you have to.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:45 PM
2

Can be. They can also not be, though. Agreed. ​ Choose a better wife! Don't get unevenly yoked. Sure. My issue is that society gaslights men into putting themselves into these situations. And the result is I drink male tears or emotional labor talk or well what you see in the pic.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:29 PM
2

I agree with you here: Imo, the true injustice in western society is how the legal and family court systems are geared in favour of women. Men need to put in atleast twice the effort to prove their innocent/claim than a woman does and that's something I'll fight against everyday of the week. And fair enough on the below as well: Using one example doesn't paint an entire gender or society in that light just as much as when "all men are the same" is said. We are most definitely not all the same. T…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:14 PM
6

Its biological. The instincts say weak man and thus not deserving of mating with her.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:11 PM
0

Fair point on Mothers. They can be someone you can vent to. My post was more about telling it to your wife or GF. And Men are expected to be there for women's emotional issues in relationships. It's just when it's a Man's time, they begin to talk about emotional labor and not his therapist and or just react like the person in the OP. Is why I said vent to fellow male family members or friends or here.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 09:33 PM
12

Oh I'm aware. I just don't care. Everybody is always saying to Men that biological imperative is not an excuse. But it's an excuse when it comes to women. Yeah no. Fuck off with that.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 09:18 PM
7

Whether immature or not is irrelevant. This open up bullshit is spread by feminism and society and doesn't help men at all. As when the man opens up he gets ridiculed. Hence why I said, don't open up to women or society but to your bros whether that be male family members or friends.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 09:13 PM
9

Look bud, please read this part: Your position is one of compassion. And sure it is, but it ultimately exists to serve the interests of society and women. Your position can be entirely based on altruism. I have no issue with that. All I'm pointing out is some reality separate from you. I never made claims about your person or personality.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:48 AM
1

Body acceptance is just more power for women to be fat but force people to see it as healthy and beautiful.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:33 AM
12

No. Your takes on what I say are wrong, persistent and annoying...to the point it seems intentional. In what way am I wrong? I did not make any accusations towards you. You are claiming I'm making accusations and that I'm being hostile which leads to this big post of yours. ​ Not remotely. My position is one of logic and accurate terminology.That said, I should say DNA father rather than blood father. Logic and pragmatism is the husband should not be caring for the spawn of another man cause tha…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:08 AM
16

You are taking my post to be more hostile towards you then it is. Your position is one of compassion. And sure it is, but it ultimately exists to serve the interests of society and women. Women say it doesn't matter cause they are assured no matter what the kid is theirs. They have no stakes in danger whatsoever. Society only cares that a kid can live on to fuel it with taxes and it doesn't have to pay for the kid while they are still a kid and thus wants the "father" to take care of that. This …
/r/MensRights20/04/23 04:12 AM
29

An opinion Women and Society wholeheartedly agree with cause a man funds it all and they are free to laugh at him. The problem is not a Man shouldn't absolutely adopt kids or abhor kids not of his blood. The problem is the man had no choice. He was tricked.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:54 AM
1

The funny thing is that South Korea had a worst birth rate then Japan. Like it's 0.71 or something like that. But the news is obsessed with Japan for some reason.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 06:30 AM
1

Body positivity is bullshit anyway cause its all about saying fat women beautiful and healthy. Men being thinner means they live longer so I'm fine with it.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 04:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter