TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

trias_e Archive

View 3 posts and 210 comments by trias_e on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

While you did get one answer, which is probably much of the truth, another possible answer is that women do better with committed partners, and it requires a longer-term pattern of fucking to get someone pregnant if fertility is obscured.
/r/BlackPillScience10/10/19 07:27 PM
1

Only from the abstract, so this may be covered in the paper, but on its face there's a couple of obvious issues here. First, sexual satisfaction may simply decline with age, or age of partner, or both. Second, survivor bias: Those in stable marriages are going to be those who have a positive view of their marriage almost by definition. While it's interesting that views of their marriage improved over time, it's not that interesting without comparing it to the trajectory of those who ended up sep…
/r/BlackPillScience09/10/19 05:17 PM
35

AFAIK, the reason that human females don't go into obvious estrus like other primates is to hide their fertile periods. So I'm not surprised this finding doesn't replicate.
/r/BlackPillScience09/10/19 05:01 PM
3

Monogamy (perhaps not perfect monogamy, but general monogamy) is found in every great civilization on earth. Considering it is so rare in human history otherwise, it almost makes you think that it's a requirement for civilization to exist.
/r/BlackPillScience14/04/19 02:41 PM
8

"A prodigy but nothing really out of the common" ......
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 07:07 AM
13

It absolutely wasn't. Any man who could hold down a job was getting laid regularly. It used to be called marriage. This was the carrot that kept the horse (and society) moving. Now there's no carrot...just a stick.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/16 11:18 PM
6

You're saying you think transgenger humans tricked other males into thinking they were female, so they could fuck the females without the males knowing? Yeah...I mean, if you have any anthropological record of any culture on earth where this was a thing, or in chimps, bonobos, etc, I'm interested, otherwise, it's a pretty weak say-so story. I think the obvious problem with your theory is that human beings and other apes are sexually dimorphic to the point where such trickery is unlikely to succe…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 12:48 AM
3

There are 'bugs' in organisms though. Not everything is an adaptation. Anyways, exclusive homosexuality is extremely rare in the animal kingdom for obvious reasons, and bisexuality can be explained simply as sexual behavior which evolved because of heterosexuality and reproduction, but never had selective pressure to 'turn it off' among members of the same sex.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 12:40 AM
4

Umm...you have to at least have a story how it could possibly help them mate. I'm not seeing one for human transgenders.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 12:38 AM
2

As someone who has lacked motivation through my entire life, and whose family has similarly lacked it, does it really just boil down to dopamine? I generally just attributed it to not giving a shit about this particular society because I am oh so smart, but I wonder if it really just boils down to a genetic dopamine issue. Perhaps I should do some coke to see what other people feel like.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 05:28 PM
11

It's some of the biggest evidence of projection as well. Feminism/society talks about men feeling they are entitled to sex for various reasons. But that is actually really just how women treat men. If you want to see real entitlement, look at a woman whose sexual advances have been turned down.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 10:00 PM
1

Damn. As someone who has done some research into this field...oops!
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 08:54 AM
2

Not true at all, but there are far more men at the top end of IQ (and the low end).
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 03:33 PM
1

Ahh, I see, thanks. To say it explicitly: Testosterone has been linked to violence, but only so far when also in the presence of lead, so lead + test does link to violence, but test alone may not.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 10:34 PM
1

True, but what does that have to do with testosterone?
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 09:41 PM
4

16 is the age of consent in many first world countries and for good reason. 16 year olds aren't little kids anymore.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 03:20 PM
3

All potential partners: Fuck Zanford in the ass, then do it again because if he didn't like it the first time and can't get over it he's broken goods (and if he liked it the first time, well, do it again for his sake!)
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 08:23 AM
2

She aged well, but...I don't think so. http://www.purpleclover.com/health/2691-20-middle-aged-nude-scenes/item/4/
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 10:53 PM
1

"Yeah, statistics with all its "average", " standard deviation" and "confidence range" only matter when they agree with what we want hear, duh." Of course they always matter. "Yeah, let's pick an obvious outlier, fuck statistics, who likes maths anyway!" Hey, I quite like Math. I am pursuing a degree in it at the moment for that reason. My point was that while there are outliers like Clooney, there are no corresponding female outliers, and that the conception of the wall as it is in regards to w…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 07:52 PM
10

Should note that that 'wall' you are looking at ONLY takes into account average physical attractiveness. Economics, status, power, and yes even personality (game)...all matter in the equation quite significantly. Also, the average of what women are most attracted to is just that, average. For instance, George Clooney most certainly never hit any sort of wall physial or otherwise. The same aged Julianna Moore on the other hand. http://static.tvgcdn.net/MediaBin/Galleries/Editorial/130107/Golden_G…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 03:28 PM
1

I think that's about as possible as willing yourself to be sexually attracted to a 70 year old woman. Imagine yourself in bed with your wife or even girlfriend. You hear an intruder break in. You don't say, "well honey, since both our lives have equal value, lets go together to face this threat." Nor does she think that. You go and put yourself in immediate danger to protect her. That, intrinsically, her life is more valuable than yours is programmed into both of your DNA. Now, you may become mo…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 02:11 PM
0

She's sort of correct, and I'm guessing you were watching camille pagilia. The only thing she gets wrong is that this doesn't stem from an 'antiquated' time: It's a fundamental distinction between men and women and doesn't necessarily have to do with war and repopulation, but rather stems from the fact that men can impregnate many women. Women have a clear hard limit in how many offspring they can have. Men have basically no limit (at least until you get into the 100:1+ ratio.) An alpha female p…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 11:47 PM
-1

Seriously, and it's not anything to get mad about, nor is it an injustice. Yep, the average woman's life is more important than the average male's life in every society (except in post-war situations where the sex ratio is massively skewed). Women don't own men. But the average woman has more value than the average men. This is something that is intrinsically understood by everyone. There's a reason that both men and women alike will prefer to save a random woman over a random man, and it's not …
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 11:40 PM
3

The aami fact sheet doesn't correct for hours driven, so it's more or less worthless. It is absolutely true however that when men get into accidents, they tend to be more severe than women's accidents. Men participate in much more risky behavior such as speeding, drinking and driving, and not taking weather conditions as seriously as they should, which is generally considered the cause of this. Insurance premiums are higher for men for two reasons: They drive more often than women on average, an…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 10:08 PM
13

Is this fake? If not, jesus christ. Run, don't walk.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 01:17 AM
3

People are more. But we aren't replacing our relationships with contracts for shits and giggles. A marriage itself is the replacement of a relationship with a legal contract. And whenever you sign a legal contract with anyone, you better be checking the numbers.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 12:51 AM
2

You've edited your main post into something that makes no sense whatsoever.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 12:43 AM
2

Practically speaking, yes, you should have done better if your wife cheats on you. But no, not all women cheat, even in shitty relationships with betas who they find unattractive. And if you don't get angry at it, you're either the biggest beta in the entire world or incredibly autistic.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 12:41 AM
1

I agree you shouldn't act like a child, but that doesn't mean you should never get angry or sad in a relationship.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 12:38 AM
0

The 'TRP lifestyle' is simply a reaction to the current state of society. If it were actually beneficial to a man to get married and be a provider, there would be little against it here.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/14 10:41 PM
1

We're back to being good friends. Didn't happen til they were in the process of getting divorced though. Luckily, they were in their late 20's and didn't have kids and weren't married long, so the divorce (while being obviously incoming) was at least not a financially traumatic experience for him.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 10:14 PM
6

The main question I want to ask this author (and some MRAs as well): What would you do when the concept of masculinity is destroyed? What would the productive purpose of your life be? You've defined yourself entirely in terms of destroying masculinity as some oppressive construct that you must rail against. But why haven't you tried to promote whatever attributes you think are good in life instead? Why do only act in opposition, as the righteous oppressed? All you've done is define yourself as b…
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 03:15 PM
1

To be honest, I agree that you shouldn't actively fuck that girl if you don't have to. The optimal thing, if you can do it, is to get sexts and nude pics as evidence, and give it to your friend. I come at this from a very specific experience: One of my best friends married someone who constantly, strongly flirted with me (even after they were engaged). After telling him about this, he simply stopped talking to me, and got married anyways. Of course, they are divorced 3 years later. Not surprisin…
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 03:02 PM
12

How often now we see that the married male who wants sex (and is denied it) is lambasted by the wife and marriage counselors who claim that everything is his fault. They are pleased to paint the man as the villain who must desperately recompense for his imagined crimes and end the story there. But look at the reversal here. The man is withholding sex. The woman isn't happy. But here, all of the sudden, the preferences of one partner are invalidated. They are shallow, sexist urges for preferring …
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 02:55 PM
1

My best buddy started going bald when he was 20. 7 years later, he shaves his head, has a very nice trimmed beard, works out...and is doing far better with women than he used to in his full-head-of-hair days. And objectively, pretty damn good (especially since he's a very introverted dude). Anyways, own it and build a style around it, and lift of course, you'll be ok.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/14 10:57 AM
1

http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/ppoint/blood_revenge.pdf
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 02:49 AM
1

You're ignoring a very important component of humanity: combat and warfare.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 02:25 AM
2

You both are looking at the issue too simplistically. He's right that endurance and cooperation matter. He's wrong that strength doesn't matter. Turns out, all of these things are fucking important.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 02:24 AM
0

A guy who has a girlfriend who is willing to fuck around is already hurt, he just doesn't know it yet. If she's willing to fuck you, she's gonna fuck someone else. Honestly, fucking your friends GF is an act of charity, assuming you tell him about it. Sacrifice your friendship to show your friend that his GF is a cunt and that he needs to move on. Unfortunately, it doesn't work to just say 'she flirts with other guys all the time', or 'she wants my dick and you need to drop her'.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 02:05 AM
7

Agreed. Never have met a legitimate 100% lesbian (in a sample of 20+). It's always comical how, once given sexual attention from a high value dude, how quickly that changes. Also, it's pretty crazy how many girls are lesbian entirely for political reasons.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 01:33 AM
1

Depends how hot the woman is.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 01:26 AM
6

If you're masculine and work out, I think you're exactly correct, especially given how most asian dudes are less masculine / smaller (in the U.S. at least). You get the double bonus of both being good looking via working out and being a real exception from the norm. Reframing your mind is often bullshit 'The Secret' type stuff, but you've reframed your mind to reality.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 02:58 AM
6

This is such a good example of how differently the sexes think about relationships and cheating. "Is it physical, or emotional?" "Cheat in my mind, is you cheat and don't tell me...There's no cheating, there's only a conversation." Most men wouldn't say these things. The focus on the physical/emotional divide (and communication, as if it can remedy the situation) is a common one for women, and the reason is their interests. If a guy has a one night stand with someone he doesn't care about, it do…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 12:02 AM
1

Agreed with one exception: People who have your respect will take it seriously regardless of the majority, especially if it's not a common occurrence.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 11:12 PM
1

I think many of us simply don't see the possibility of improvement, and act accordingly. I suppose you might say that's fatalistic, but I'd say it's just realistic. This also probably ties into the extremity of one's viewpoint regarding the decline.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 11:04 PM
5

Civilization is pretty much a history of controlling the sexuality of women.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 11:01 PM
10

It very well might be instinctual. It would certainly make sense that women would be naturally inclined to fuck their provider for a short period after fucking an alpha who may have gotten them pregnant.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 06:09 AM
42

I seek them out. Sometimes online, sometimes I meet them casually at a bar. I have been blessed (or cursed) with good looks, charm, humor, and a vulnerability that draws men to me. I know this, and I use it to get my fix. I know exactly what I need to do to get a specific man in bed with me. If I’m at a bar, I even know what kind of drink I should order to pique his interest. It’s a science to me, and I have my PhD. Most ridiculously idiotic thing I've ever read. I can't even fathom how stupid y…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 08:26 PM
3

How old are you (or rather, how old are the women you are talking to)? I think that age plays a huge part in this. I've had immense influence on younger women (seriously, one girlfriend of mine went from hardcore college liberal from fucking Wellesley to basically conservative in my time with her). With older women...good luck with that. To be honest, this applies to most people (most people don't really change their opinions after 30), but I've found the change to be more extreme in women. Inte…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 12:43 AM
9

"Forcing yourself from committing", as you put it, is the best way to actually have a successful LTR. Nothing kills attraction faster than complacency. Men complain all the time about their women 'changing' in a relationship, but I think it's very often a reaction to their men becoming complacent. The man that the woman was originally attracted to was the one who was doing shit on his own terms, but most men these days lose that frame once they're in a serious LTR.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 12:01 AM
-3

"Plenty of things in the world are not about sex, and sex isn't about power (although rape does take away the power of sexual selection from women)." - Me.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 05:31 AM
15

I wouldn't take most people's opinion on this seriously. It's easy to say 'I'd rather die than X', but when actual death is imminent, one's actual reaction would be much different. People can't mentally put themselves in extreme states like this by just imagining it. Only if someone has experienced both a life or death situation and rape could you take them seriously when they say this.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 05:26 AM
2

Hmm. I'm pretty sure he was drunk, and not gonna lie, I could see myself reacting in such a fashion to that behavior while drunk...even to strangers. I mean, I've been dumb enough to react that way with men! With a bunch of tiny asian girls...lol.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 04:54 AM
0

"Saying that "women can't change themselves" imply that the fact that they're women has something to do that they are unable bring themselves to self-improve." Yeah, that's a good implication, although it certainly doesn't mean that ALL women are like that (haha). Human beings are a sexually dimorphic species. Women are less likely to take risks and more likely to be concerned with social consensus. Women have little motivation to change themselves from the ground up, because such change isn't l…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 12:32 AM
-4

I think that's a pretty shitty interpretation of the original post. If the original poster actually meant that, then it's a really shitty post.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 12:30 AM
5

Doesn't seem like a joke at all to me sadly.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 03:36 AM
0

If you are pathetic and weak-willed, then yes, this shit is accurate: The last is the most important. Human social interactions are subtle. Most of what we communicate is sub-verbal. Your friends might be pulling you down, even while their words are full of encouragement. This is a very subtle form of negativity, but it can cripple your efforts to improve your life. If your friends are losers, you will be surrounded by constant negative social reinforcement whenever you take positive actions, an…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:03 PM
10

Even prewall women can be in this mode - they just cannot get commitment out of the men they are attracted to, DESPITE being attractive. This is a good point. But why? The intrinsic qualities of women do, absolutely, matter for their prospects in LTRs. And the reason many women cannot get that commitment is because, while they are gorgeous, smart high quality men still do absolutely care about those intrinsic factors when it comes to LTRs. I agree that there's no real analogue of alpha/beta for …
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 11:52 AM
1

Ahh. I misunderstood your original post. I thought you meant that it's never rational to forgo reproduction, ever. Misunderstood the 'full stop' bit. That said, it's plausible that genetic fitness could be maximized in some circumstances by forgoing reproduction and focusing on the success of one's kin, in general, I agree that it's very unlikely to be a good strategy.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 01:15 AM
1

There are plenty of cases where maximizing reproductive fitness over the course of the lifetime of an organism means forgoing mating temporarily. "In your example, the environment doesn't seem rational to the animal so the animal responds by behaving irrationally." This statement is meaningless.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 11:08 PM
1

I recall one of my friends going to see Magic Mike. She called me and talked about how horny she was, and how I am clearly wrong that men are more horny than woman. I simply pointed out that she felt that way after seeing basically the top .1% of men in sexual situations. I feel that way if she (a 6 or so) shows some cleavage and wears tight fitting clothes. I'm not saying she feels any less horny than I do at that moment, but it's a rarity for her to get there. Practically speaking in day to da…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 10:13 AM
2

There's a wide variety of psychological motivations behind rape, and yes, sometimes the primary motivation is frustrated sexual desire. Anytime you hear the psychology of 'X is about Y', be suspicious. Human beings are complex creatures. Saying that rape is about power is about as stupid (and as supported) as saying theft is about power.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 09:53 PM
-2

I don't think that women are conscious, calculating schemers when it comes to AFBB, like many people here do. I think it's a natural sexual strategy. That women fuck 'bad boys' in one-night-stands and flings is indeed validated, but I think that women genuinely seek out different characteristics in their long-term partners. Unfortunately, the long-term partners are also genuinely less sexy to women, and often become boring after a certain point (often after children have been born and cared for …
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 09:26 PM
3

To be perfectly honest, as someone who has been with only one person since you were 15, much less of what of spoken of here will be relevant to you (there's a reason many people on this sub suggest that marriage only makes sense if you are her first). There's a bit of a mistake in saying that things are 'hard-coded' into the brain. Behaviors still require experience/environment to activate. I think game-playing (shit testing) is something that comes about after being 'fooled' so to speak by the …
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 10:01 PM
10

Male IQ variance can probably be explained by simply stating that the upper tier of men go to college to study and most women go to college to find a provider No, the higher male variance in IQ is found much earlier than that. That said, it could still be a product of culture, although I think it's unlikely to be primarily cultural.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 10:45 PM
6

What he said corresponds with my experience as well. I also teach middle school across the world, and this is very true of the boys and girls here also. Not scientific, but also not fictional.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 10:41 PM
4

This is the fundamental, sexist reasoning which is used to explain the gender gap in STEM.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 10:31 PM
12

Apply feminist logic to minority punishments vs white punishments: "This can be seen as a 'What about the blacks' trope, it is actually a study on how the justice system infantilizes whites and inexplicably protects them from charges and established incarceration periods. The only reasonable conclusion that I can see is that due to racist norms, whites are seen by the justice system as being too weak to handle the rigors of the criminal system." Oh? You can see OTHER conclusions in this case? My…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 10:50 PM
2

Drink better beer!
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 11:55 PM
0

People have been systematically killed for many, many things. Your point is?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 04:42 AM
0

...And in your rebuttal, people were systematically KILLED for...what?
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 02:36 PM
8

In general I agree. I think the concept of 'incel' comes from the idea that just by being yourself you will 'find someone'. It leads people to believing that there is something inherently wrong with them that causes their celibacy. Because of this belief in 'just be yourself', people don't think improving themselves is even possible. It's such a poisonous idea (although there's nothing wrong with being TRUE to yourself, but that is a quite different concept).
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 07:39 AM
14

The reason it doesn't work as a victim narrative is because it's not considered a bad thing for women. Something that is a problem for men simply has no place in the narrative. Things that women have control over (weight) have more valid victim-hood status than things that men have no control over (height).
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 04:02 AM
1

How about waiting outside someone's property until they come outside, and then following them wherever they go, 'annoying them' as you say, over the course of months? The point is that, while in public places, the distinction between voluntary and involuntary isn't that clear, since in public you can be followed against your will, so one can not simply choose to be free of the annoyance. Yes, you can leave a public area for a private one to avoid someone, but in the stalker example this is only …
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 11:45 PM
2

There are fundamental differences in how the left and the right see the world. These are differences not just manufactured in political parties, but in how people sort and interpret reality. Haidt: http://www.ted.com/talks/jonathan_haidt_on_the_moral_mind Ideologically, the left in particular has made a very serious impact. In academia, there is a commitment to blank-slatism from the left that has led to very real effects. For example, we have Lewontin pushing his '85% of human variation is with…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 11:40 PM
1

This isn't quite right. There are some pretty obvious cases of harassment which wouldn't be harassment under these guidelines. For example, hardcore stalking wouldn't be considered harassment, but rather annoyance.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 10:53 PM
1

Yeah, this was my introduction a long time ago as well. I believe it was sophmore year of college. My mind was absolutely blown. To give perspective, I was raised mormon, and breaking free of religion was, while a multiyear process, fairly straightforward for me. On the other hand, breaking free from the cultural indoctrination that 'men and women are precisely the same if not for culture' and general blank-slate-ism was much more of a shock. Ladder theory was my first step away from the orthodo…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 09:35 PM
0

Far less women are exclusively homosexual than men. More women are bisexual. In general, female sexual orientation seems to be more fluid than males. This study always fascinated me: http://neuronarrative.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/the-stimulating-paradox-of-female-desire/
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 10:24 PM
9

Unfortunately, plenty of men today are very interested in being victims as well today. Honestly, too many MRA's fall in that category.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 10:07 PM
2

A bell curve I think is the best way to think of it. The vast majority of people are either average or slightly above or below average in attractiveness, and land between 3-7. 0 and 10 don't even exist. 1 and 9 are incredibly rare. Note that due to hypergamy this leads to many women naturally chasing after very, very few men (at least when it comes to short-term relationships based on looks).
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 03:27 AM
3

I teach in Korea. This is a brutal, soul-crushing school system, and I feel horribly for the poor kids who have to go through it.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 03:00 AM
10

I'm actually impressed that the article cited David Buss. You may not know his name, but he kind of busted the lid on the whole alpha fucks, beta bucks thing, academically at least: http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~rakison/bussandschmitt.pdf However, what he is saying here isn't that men are interested in fat chicks. Simply that ridiculously skinny isn't usually what men seek. This is true, and that women think that 'the skinnier the better, no matter what', is a media invention. Of course, it's easy to …
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 07:11 AM
-24

" If you were on a tropical island, would you not just enjoy life? You would not read philosophy. You would not take life seriously. You would let your brain rot and take in the pleasures of the body. You would sleep with an island native here or there and think nothing of it. You would wear silly costumes; stay out late at night all the time, drink, maybe even wear tattoos." Haha. Um, no. Let me recommend not reading this retard.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 10:25 PM
1

If a women was with her beta husband for the sex, she wouldn't leave because of lack of money. So it implies either alpha fucks, or no fucks.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 08:59 PM
3

What I said has nothing to do with #1. #2 might seem close, but it implies that once a woman has access to you, they will be less attracted to you. What I said does not imply that whatsoever.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 08:51 PM
1

I know precisely what alpha fucks beta bucks means, and I knew about it before TRP was a twinkle in anyone's eyes. The fact that women leave if money dwindles is because of Alpha fucks, beta bucks. If women were there for the sex, they wouldn't leave just because of money dwindling. If you take one logical step forward, this implies alpha fucks (or no fucks). They are there for the money, shown by the fact that they leave if it goes away. This directly shows beta bucks. No, alpha fucks beta buck…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 08:50 PM
1

"Its not like everyone who isnt a male model or butt ugly is on equal footing. More silliness." That IS pretty much the case. From the recent okcupid survey, by facial features alone women consider 80% of men to be below average attractiveness. It's not rocket science to figure out. Women are interested in the top, but looks is only one part of that spectrum.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 03:44 AM
3

How about a third option? Women's interest in sexually successful males makes perfect sense, and it's not because they only want what they can't have, and it's not because you are all of the sudden very confident (although those both might have some impact, differing for varying people.) When it comes to sex, women are far more focused on society, culture, and environment than men are. A man who has a girl has shown that he is successful in the current social environment. A man who is sexually s…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 02:52 AM
1

You have identified some competing ideas which aren't fully compatible with each other. People might give you advice here, but these are questions on which I think different people will have far different optimum solutions. I think the most important lesson you can learn from this is just because something is written in a book or a blog you respect doesn't mean it is relevant to your life. For myself, isolation is my best tool for improving my life, but only positive isolation. For others, I'm s…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:51 AM
1

That's fair. There's a few 'progressive' ideas that are likely compatible with TRP. I'm not sure if welfare or personal freedom really are, but it's at least up for debate. The one thing that is most certainly not compatible is someone who really identifies as a 'progressive' along with all the bullshit that entails (same goes for conservative or libertarian, really)
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:48 AM
1

Girls only care about a face more than anything if you are really, really fucking attractive. At least two standard deviations away from the mean. Yeah, if you're ugly, it's going to be difficult to get women. But have you literally never seen an attractive woman with a below average looking guy? I've seen plenty. Stop being such a pussy. Here's the deal: Women find 90% of men to not be attractive just by looks alone. Yeah, if you are very handsome, it's easy mode. The rest of us all have to imp…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:40 AM
-1

I don't think there is a max for any man. Best thing about being a man. We can always learn and improve when it comes to the opposite sex. Always. Even if you a broke loser, you can still improve. Even if you are a multi-millionare, you can still improve. You're right that if you were born with a terrible disability you're probably fucked, but for 99% of men, there are most certainly gains to be had.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:37 AM
3

Yeah, even the highest status man will become sexually unattractive if they are a pussy in interaction. Still, you most certainly get a whole lot more leeway.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:35 AM
1

False equivalence. Massive difference to how men perceive a hot girl and how women perceive an alpha. Men will put up with bullshit from a hot woman to get laid, but women do not see what an alpha does as bullshit at all.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:34 AM
3

There is most certainly a massive selection bias going on with the type of women guys encounter here. Also, it's by no means counter to TRP theories like hypergamy if women don't fuck alphas all the time, any more than men who don't cheat on their older wives is a counter to 'men find younger women most sexually attractive'. I'm not sure if people really get that here.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:31 AM
4

I know some 25+ year old virgin women. They are quite fat and unattractive, but I believe them when they say they are virgins.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:29 AM
3

I'm not sure how you can be TRP and also be 'progressive'. Most progressive policies are anti-TRP/reality.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:26 AM
20

This post should be on the top of this subreddit and burned into the eyes of anyone who comes here.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:23 AM
1

Alpha fucks, beta bucks, is simply a manifestation of briffault's law. They aren't separate things.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:19 AM
5

How in the fuck does this inane comment have so many upvotes? The women is with her beta husband for the money. If the money goes away, she leaves. That is precisely alpha fucks, beta bucks.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 12:17 AM
10

I think most grand human achievements were not done consciously for the sake of pussy. Yes, men probably evolved a propensity to try such things because they were sexually successful doing so, but that doesn't mean that such achievements aren't intrinsically pleasing/valuable for men.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 05:34 AM
1

Not a coping mechanism in the usual psychological sense, but an evolutionary one. The Gay uncle hypothesis is an interesting one. Google it. If the majority of males didn't successfully breed, it makes a ton of sense. Also, look at the rates of homosexuality for first born, second born, third born, etc. sons (thought to come about due to changes in womb environment). More supporting evidence for that theory.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 01:54 AM
5

I don't think there is much moral difference between infanticide and abortion. The only reason one is accepted and the other isn't is arbitrary cultural convention. Most moral arguments that justify abortion would also justify infanticide.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 02:10 AM
-2

3) Only useful if you don't have a life. 5) Be cocky about it if it comes up, but don't bring it up out of the blue (tho feel free to bring it up quickly if you are 8+/10 in physical attractiveness). 11) wat rest is obvious
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 03:09 PM
1

Many? (generally correct, but pretty shitty argument)
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 02:16 PM
1

Idiotic.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 02:15 PM
20

Fucking hell.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 01:53 AM
3

Both your explanation and fastbrained are correct. The subconscious has many facets, and the hamster exists in us all.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 01:49 AM
1

For fucking, there's no reason. For long term relationships, men and women are basically on an even playing field in terms of standards (at least they should be), so it makes sense to me for that. More cynically, they can sort far more easily by job and income right away.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 01:39 AM
1

While those IQ numbers are accurate: 1) Unknown how much of that is due to genetic factors. It's unlikely that more than 50% of the difference is. 2) Lower IQ doesn't necessarily imply that there is no chance for social improvement. But you are right that we should not expect equal performance from every group, even if given the same starting conditions.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 01:36 AM
5

I don't think MRAs have taken the red pill at all. MRAs refuse to accept the fundamental fact behind TRP: Men and women are Different (with a capital fucking D). Men are always going to be worth less than women unless they are alpha. This isn't something to rage against or view as an injustice, it's simply a fact. As an example, there are fundamentally different psychological reactions to the suffering of men vs. the suffering of women (the latter is considered far more traumatic and horrible). …
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 02:06 AM
2

I feel like this really boils down to one thing: Follow your passions in life, and make sure you don't let anything get in the way of what you want in the long run. Short-term pleasure will fuck you over in the end if you don't train yourself to have discipline and continue after the goals you have. If you really don't have any passions or goals, then I see nothing wrong with jerking off and playing video games the rest of your life. I played a shit-ton of games from 12-22. I don't regret it a s…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 07:54 AM
2

Is that link an onion article? There is absolutely nothing mathematically impossible about women having a different MEDIAN number of partners than men. How in the fuck did that trash get published? I do agree with you that surveys are often terrible data however.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 07:23 AM
3

Dick comments: I don't like 'your dick is big'. Just so cliched, and men know if they have a big dick or not, so it's not needed whatsoever. If your dick is big, you are like 'no shit', and if your dick isn't big, it's obviously insincere bullshit. 'I love your dick' growled lustily is much better and works with anyone.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 12:27 AM
1

I'm kind of fascinated by this. In some sense, it is a natural extension of feminist beliefs. Feminism is opposed to the domination of women by men, but enjoyable sex for most women implies some male domination (note I do not mean anything close to rape by this statement). Their natural desires are fundamentally opposed to their ideological commitment. Most feminist women are capable of hamstering this away in some way, but these radfem women sort of take the red pill: They realize that biology …
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 12:06 AM
7

The comments are hilarious. The sense of entitlement and utter solipsism in them is textbook.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 03:00 AM
3

Yep. She's pretty much pure TRP in her understanding of men and women in this culture. Her and Sommers are good stuff.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 11:57 PM
18

What data points would you have liked him to pick? The fact that women rate 80% of men as below average is by far the most interesting (and craziest) statistic in there.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 11:50 PM
3

Both men and women seek out people with lower attractiveness for long-term relationships. http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/allwoman/Men-prefer-to-marry-less-attractive-women--study
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 11:44 PM
9

Should be noted that it's all about looks (and what you put in your income bracket and job description) on okcupid where there is basically no chance to have any personality or game. Elsewhere it's 50/50.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 11:43 PM
6

1 and 2 are obviously above average in attractiveness. 3 is probably average. 4 is below average.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 11:41 PM
1

You're not intelligent enough to understand why you're not answering the question. Sorry about that.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 11:34 PM
1

One man could easily impregnate all of the women in an entire hunter-gatherer tribe 24/7. Time is not an issue. Resources are the issue. Most men who had successful children in human history put time and resources into their children's development. Simple as that. This is why one-itis exists (to tie a man to a woman during the childs most vulnerable stages), and why it usually takes effort to overcome it. It's part of our evolutionary history.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 10:42 AM
1

The biggest shit you are missing is that men who had successful children usually put some resources into them past just fucking. Most men and women were serial monogamists, meaning that one man would stick with one woman for ~3 years while their child was at their most vulnerable. Of course, this means men do need to make sure their child has good genes...although since they inherently put less resources in than the mother, their discrimination for sex will of course be lower.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 10:40 AM
2

His point (which basically no one is addressing) is why do men not just fuck everyone they see since their investment in the act of reproduction is nil. There's no downside to having ugly children if you aren't investing in them past one act of sex. The answer is that most men did investment time and resources into their mate/child. If you read the excellent "The Mating Mind" by Geoffrey Miller, you'll see evidence that most men and women were serial monogamists, meaning that a man would provide…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 10:39 AM
1

Pretty much irrelevant. One man could keep a tribe with 100 women (which is usually the max size you'll see in hunter gatherer societies) impregnated 24/7, even if he waited 3 days between fucking each one.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 10:34 AM
1

You aren't answering the question. Who cares if you have ugly children? If you put no investment into them past fucking, there is no downside whatsoever to having some ugly children. The actual answer is that men that successfully reproduced usually did provide some resources to their mate and child, which of course is a waste if you have kids with bad genes. One-itis exists for a reason.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 10:33 AM
1

Who cares? Men can fuck basically infinity chicks. If some of the kids are ugly, it's basically irrelevant... No, the reason is both what you posted, and the fact that most men invested some resources in their mate/child. Alpha men just fucking every woman in sight with no social consequence never actually existed.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 10:31 AM
3

Try to convince women and men that men are women? Go check out MRA forums and see how successful that is. It's not successful because of evo-psych and the reality of sexual dimorphism. Change can't be induced just because people want it to occur. As far as I know, there isn't even a way to be applicable anywhere due to evolutionary psychology. Males are disposable and must compete. Every single human society I know of treats the lives and welfare of women over men (minus the 1-5% alpha males, at…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 12:12 PM
15

Psychologically its a huge deal, not physically.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 10:52 PM
2

There's no way anyone can give you specific advice without a detailed description of why you had a rough first semester. So do it yourself. Analyze exactly why you failed. Get rid of the influences and habits that caused you to fail. If they are deeply ingrained, change your environment so your habits must change. Whatever you do, don't simply continue going to school, pumping yourself up before the semester, promising yourself you will do better and things will change. Unless you have a specifi…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 05:42 AM
1

I don't see why swallowing TRP should effect one's moral judgement. Nor does TRP lead to a lack of moral judgement concerning one's own actions. Look, if you don't think there's anything wrong with fucking chicks who have boyfriends, I won't be able to convince you otherwise. There's plenty of things people disagree about when it comes to moral issues. But there's no reason that behavior suddenly shouldn't be judged as moral or immoral simply because TRP is swallowed.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/13 01:22 AM
1

I'm not trying to convince you that the behavior is wrong. If you don't think there's anything wrong with it, I won't be able to convince you otherwise. I'm pointing out that the often cited reasoning behind 'well, it's ok to fuck other people's gf's becuase...' is specious. My argument isn't directed at people who truly believe there is no problem with this behavior. It's more directed at people trying to convince themselves or others otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/13 01:20 AM
0

I think this is a fair response. And you know, I kind of agree with it. So maybe honor was the wrong angle/wording here. Lets look at this from a moral perspective. Would you rob someone because they left their door unlocked? Look, someone's going to do it eventually. And they really fucked up by leaving their door unlocked. Idiots. They deserve it. It will teach them a lesson. Don't leave your door unlocked! Despite all of that reasoning, I don't think you are justified in robbing the person th…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/13 10:00 PM
-2

It's quite easy for the slutty cheater girlfriend to get fucked. Don't worry, if you stopped doing it, she'd still get fucked! There's no need for you to participate in this particular honorable activity. Thanks anyways!
/r/TheRedPill28/11/13 09:51 PM
25

Incredibly foolish. Look, unless you really get off with watching your wife fuck other guys, you should be in no way impressed by her previous sexual shenanigans. Do you seriously think that the fun she gave to guys before she got married will be given to her married partner? If that's all she wanted (to have lots of sex with some guy who wants to marry her), why hasn't she done it already? Do you think you are a special snowflake? As the dude that married her, you are inherently inferior to the…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 02:24 PM
1

I mean already really wants to fuck you. And specifically you, not random other alpha she meets at the other bar.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/13 10:07 PM
2

This is the thing I would naturally do, and like most things I would naturally do, it's pretty bad. It's only good if she already really likes you. If not, she aint coming and she isn't considering you sexually ever again.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/13 09:46 PM
4

You fail to understand. The vast majority of these 'I might have other plans' texts are total bullshit. If someone actually has a specific thing that is going on, that's a different story. But the vague 'well I might be doing something else' can fuck right off.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/13 09:44 PM
2

I think more likely is that, in smaller tribes, being rejected could have serious consequences. Due to gossip, that man's status would be lowered amongst all available mates, and thus reproductive success would be unlikely. Another explanation is that emotional pain is also a good motivating factor for improvement. Men who feel emotional pain at rejection are more likely to improve themselves so they don't get rejected, and thus successfully reproduced more. Both explanations rely on smaller pop…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/13 01:51 AM
-6

This post is entirely wrong.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/13 02:49 PM
1

Since when did evo psych say that women are monogamous? The fuck?
/r/TheRedPill12/11/13 10:11 PM
2

Just say you fucked up. Admitting that isn't beta. Actually, I think taking responsibility for things you really fucked up is about as alpha as gets. Beta is hiding from it or giving a shallow 'sorry'. I still don't think you should say 'I'm sorry'. I'm sorry either sounds hollow or beta, it is almost always bad. Saying 'I fucked up', or 'I made a mistake.' when you actually did is correct behavior in all places in life. Taking responsibility is a good thing, and it is especially good if you are…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 11:55 PM
1

By the way, there are studies regarding the motives of rapists, and there is actually a surprising amount of variety. I'm not googling that stuff at work though, but if your google-fu is strong you can find it.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/13 01:58 AM
4

I never said physical attractiveness was all that mattered. Of course there are other things that matter. My point is that the vast majority of men would be more sexually attracted to a funny, intelligent, and mature 24 year old, than a more funny, intelligent, and mature 44 year old. That men value youth more than women attractiveness is pan-cultural (as far as I know), is predicted by evolutionary psychology, and is indeed a valid generalization. Also, I have to doubt that visual appearance is…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 06:33 AM
2

I want to upvote for Snuff Box being brilliant. So I will.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 02:52 AM
5

I didn't mean to imply that all men are the same, and all women are the same, in all respects. However, when we look at attraction, there are some criteria in which people differ individually far more than others. For instance, some men like redheads. Some like blonds. Obviously, not all men are the same in this regard. But what is almost universal is that men are more attracted to women in their younger 20's than women in their late 30's. There may be the occasional exception, but it is rare en…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 01:45 AM
31

About the 'talking about different guys' bit. People these days are miseducated. They think that men and women are the same. This leads them to looking at what attracts them to the opposite sex, and trying to use it to attract the opposite sex, when it makes no sense at all because men and women are different. For instance, modern women talk about other guys because they think it demonstrates high value, because it would for men. They would be more attracted to a male who has women interested hi…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/13 10:56 PM
5

if you had actually made that argument and justified it, it would have been a different story. instead, you simply made your personal point, Off topic (as you said) without context or reference. Personal, 'this is what I've experienced' posts by themselves, without any argument, justification, or explication are utterly useless, ego-boosting horseshit
/r/TheRedPill21/09/13 03:39 PM
1

You are making a mistake in your thinking (and one that many culture-is-all-that-matters egalitarians often make as some sort of lame counter to evo-psych, much to my constant annoyance). Yes, evolution is about reproductive success. But evolution has acted proximally, not directly. Evolution has made certain things very enjoyable for us: For men, having sex with many attractive women. For women, having sex with alpha males. For some of both sexes, raising children (for some certainly not, and a…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 10:13 AM
3

I most certainly think there are biological differences between men and women expaining what they are attracted to. However, I also think that people are socialized in such a way that gives them misguided beliefs about the opposite sex, which leads to them doing unhelpful things in trying to attract them. In fewer words, what people are attracted to is inate, what people actually do to attract people is very influenced by socialization.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 06:14 AM
-4

Of course I didn't come up with projection itself. I clearly meant that it is a new idea to use projection (and specifically projection of sexual attraction) as the fundamental explanation of the sexual habits and life choices of modern women (and men), due to modern socialization teaching that the sexes are basically equal. It is the appliation of projection to a moden phenomenon that I believe is a new insight. I've never seen it in TRP or TRP spaces in the past 10 years I've been reading them…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 06:11 AM
-5

As far as I know, using projection to explain the behavior of modern women both on a small and large scale (their behavior in bars/pick up situation, and their life choices over time) is indeed novel. If it's not, please link me to whomever came up with the idea first. I think the theorem explains all of the modern behavior of women which TRP deals with in the most simple and fundamental terms possible. It is an immensely useful and flexible way to look at the behavior of modern women.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 01:48 AM
-1

Congratulations, you've taken the entire OP and pointed out in asperger-like fashion that I should have said late twenties instead of 30. I admit defeat. As far as the conjecture part goes, if you would like to post TRP examples that aren't explained by this theorem, go right ahead. I think the entirity of TRP backs it up.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 01:39 AM
1

Look at behavior that is specifically about mate-attraction. As a microcosm of this, look at how women act when approached by men, or at bars or clubs where they are interested in being picked up. At the macro level, look at the general life choices of women. When they get married, their focus on career, the idea of fucking alphas in your youth, then becoming 'mature' as you get older (and especially as you hit 30): These are all things that they want from their ideal man. They want a sexually e…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 01:38 AM
1

I awake to read this and I'm reasonably happy with it. It certainly could be written in a better way. (Ah, the dangers of writing and posting with a high BAC). Yeah, this was posted while quite drunk, and while the tone is over the top, it is still accurate. Also, note, letting tone and emotion sway your opinion of something over logic and accuracy is the very definition of hamstering. Don't hamster, even if I baited you into hamstering, TRP. Look at the message. Modern sexual behavior is a matt…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 01:24 AM
-3

It is incredibly simple, actually. The fundamental theorem states, that if people think the sexes are fundamentally the same, they will act in the way that they want the opposite sex to act. Therefore, in this social framework, to see what someone finds attractive, look at what they are actually doing. Men supplicate and orbit because they want women to supplicate and orbit. Women are bitchy and brag about their sexual conquests because they want men to not be very attached to them, and to fuck …
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 05:20 PM
-2

As far as I can tell, every example is a supporting example. I can't post the entire subreddit, but every post in the entire subreddit is in support.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 05:16 PM
-6

First. there is no social scienctific data that goes beyond 'anecdotal experience'. Obviously. Regardless, I will give you a very nice lead. My hyopthesis is (as far as I know) the only one up for debate, since no other hypotheses have been raised to fully explain modern western sexual behavior... For my sample, I submit every trip report that has been posted to TRP. I assert that within a 95% confidence interval, all of them are easily explained by my fundamental theorem.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 05:04 PM
2

Good for men. But, by my theorem, it explains why women care about their (looks), money and status too much these days. (red pill women...don't do this! Just because you find men who do it attractive, doesn't mean you are attractive if you do it!)
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 04:34 PM
-7

Almost... "The smartest, most helpful and accurate alpha dude in the world!" There we go.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 04:29 PM
-3

The outside sources I rely on are every single experience I have had in life, every trip report I have read, and every gender interaction I have seen or experienced. On the other hand, your denial relies on no outside sources whatsoever. You don't even have the common courtesy to give one counter-example. Anyways, I posit that almost (2-3% perhaps not, as most social/evo psych rules don't apply to absolutely everyone) every thread posted to this subreddit is at its basis explained by this fundam…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 03:57 PM
-23

My post is more useful than everything else on the sidebar. Most of the links just brush against the fundmanetal reality which I am presenting. I recommend my post to the sidebar as a favor to (vastly) improve the quality of TRP. As far as I'm concerned, it should be the first thing you see if you look at TRP. I don't think there is any part of TRP which isn't encapsulated within this theorem. If you actually disagree, let me know. I come off as a superior douchenozzle because (first) I am super…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 02:57 PM
2

No, I'm just more intelligent than you are.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 01:01 PM
3

While it's true that men and women have different sexual strategies, it doesn't mean there can't be overlap. The optimal strategy for most people based on TRP is to match a kind, youthful and respectful wife along with a semi-alpha husband.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 12:56 PM
6

Not surprising in the slightest.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 03:05 PM
2

"Ok, I won't."
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 11:13 PM
3

It's a massive oversimplification of sexual strategy and behavior. Evolutionary psychology doesn't say that women will always seek men who provide resources and protection. Women will seek men who provide resources and protection only when such men are needed. For short term sexual behavior, men who provide resources and protection are not what Women seek. Alpha fucks, beta bux. Finally, if the state provides such resources, we may even see Alpha fucks, state bux, with women not looking for prov…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 09:17 PM
7

"According to evolutionary theory, women will seek men who provide resources and protection." Lines like this just piss me off so much.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 12:22 PM
0

Agreed. It's not a moral issue. It's a karmic one.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 09:55 AM
1

This isn't exactly correct. Women (well, all humanities students) apply to graduate programs with stringent standards simply because there simply are FAR too many liberal arts undergrads that want to get into grad school for the open positions available. Because there are so many applicants to humanities grad school programs, they end up with quite stringent requirements for admittance due to the competition. Seriously, good luck getting into a decent grad school if you went to a state school an…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/13 12:08 AM
10

I would guarantee you that at least 50% of women identify themselves as feminists. Are 50% of women greasy, unkempt, bull-dyke ham planets? No.* If you live in a liberal area, it's more like 90% of women identify themselves as feminists. Including all of the hottest ones. Something you just have to learn to deal with. Luckily, many of them respond well to a man challenging them, so it's not necessarily a bad thing. *However, it is the case that all greasy, unkempt, bull-dyke ham planets are femi…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/13 10:14 PM
1

That said, she did still get what she wanted. Apparently, a good looking provider beta male still found her attractive, so she got the best of both worlds. It's the male we should be shaking our heads at, not the female.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/13 08:08 PM
1

I understand that you want to claim that she is hamstering and that this isn't how it actually happened, but you have no proof of that. If it did happen how she said, he had certainly hit puberty and was a sexually mature and aggressive male. In that case, I'd like to the see evidence of 12 year old boys being traumatized by having willing sex with 17 year old babysitters. It just doesn't mesh with my own personal experience: I know damn well I would have loved it at that age and at that point w…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 03:00 PM
6

What's the point of becoming a part of this modern TRP movement if you had nothing to become bitter about? If life was as advertised, TRP wouldn't exist. Bitterness exists because modern life as advertised is horseshit, which is what TRP tries to rectify.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 06:33 AM
12

She actually sounds surprisingly not racist.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 05:29 PM
4

Absolutely true, and as the son of a dad who stuck around with a wife who didn't respect him, I would say it's probably not a good option either. Lesser of two evils would be getting divorced, assuming she is a decent mother and relatively stable.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 05:07 PM
2

My thoughts as well. Sexuality is not essentialistic. It is statistical. This person sounds more like an outlier. If any male had an easy enough time getting laid as a hot women does, they would rack up 100+ partners quick as shit. If a hot women has a similar sexual psychology to a male, then she will do just that. The issue is that, if a women has a similar sexual phychology to a male, is she really LTR material?
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 08:33 AM
2

This stuff is more complicated than most give it credit for. Having an attractive face is good. Having an attractive body is good. Having an attractive skillset is good. Having attractive behavior is good. Being dominant is good. This shit all interacts. Your goal should be to not rate below average in any of these categories and to specialize in a few of them.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 08:16 AM
0

You're applying your own sexual attractiveness criteria to women. Solipsism isn't helpful.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 07:43 AM
35

This is the female equivalent of betas complaining about the friend zone. As an equivalent response to what feminists have to the friendzone: The next time you hear a 'successful' older woman say "Why are there no good men out there?", respond, "Just because you are 'successful' doesn't mean you are entitled to a man. They aren't dispensers in which you put in career success and age and relationships and love come out."
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 03:30 PM
10

It's a cool study, but keep in mind its big limitations. The sample was from a fraternity and sorority, which limits its generalizability (I'm now declaring this a word). What they call male dominance is just male's assessment of the fighting ability of other males, nothing more. There are almost certainly other unaccounted for variables that better explain what we are seeing here other than their 'dominance'. They just happen to correlate with 'dominance'. Another big issue is that female ratin…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 03:07 PM
1

Stop masturbating. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11760788?ordinalpos=16&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12659241?dopt=Abstract
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 08:06 PM
3

Don't forget porn. I think that massive amounts of easily available internet porn have a big impact in making women not worth it as well, and is a big part of why many blue pill men or MGTOW are dropping out of the race for women
/r/TheRedPill21/07/13 04:09 PM
1

Great artists are often miserable and depressed because miserable and depressed people make better artists. Didn't stop many of them from drowning in pussy. As far as what I do? I do what I care about. I don't know if I will revolutionize a field, sure, but that's fine. If you're passionate about something and good at it, you'll be in good shape, even if you aren't world-famous. Ever seen an alpha professor being an object of desire for almost every girl in the class? I sure as fuck have, and it…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/13 07:42 PM
1

I mildly disagree. I'd rather be Feynman or Beethoven than a musclehead, and I'm pretty sure they valued themselves quite a bit and everybody knew it. If you're elite in a field or intellectual endeavor, that's much more impressive than going to the gym on a regular basis. If you aren't elite or don't want to be elite, then yeah, make sure you look good. If you have better things to be doing, then focus on that and go to the gym when you get the chance.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/13 05:18 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_selection
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 08:02 PM
10

The big problem is that blue pill beta only works if certain social norms are in place. If female promiscuity is acceptable and no-fault divorces are legal, then blue pillers are fucked. Increasing female choice and lowering female responsibility are what make being beta shit.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 07:51 PM
1

You act as if the entire mental health field consists of medication, when that most certainly is not the case. Now, I agree that telling someone with mental health issues that their problems will be solved if they just do some yoga and meditation is bad advice. However, I've been 'prescribed' meditation and exercise from psychologists before. Guess these PhD's are just quacks? http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/meditation-heals-body-and-mind http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/23/medi…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 05:35 PM
1

I wouldn't necessarily be so quick in dismissing 'ancient non-scientific' methods. Often, they persist for a reason (of course not always). That said, anyone with BPD should see a psychiatrist (and I would assume she has) http://healthland.time.com/2013/01/28/yoga-and-the-mind-can-yoga-reduce-symptoms-of-major-psychiatric-disorders/
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:09 PM
7

What a disgusting article. This shit makes me sick. The total lack of logic and framing of the behavior is way off the deep end. The best part is when they bring up her husband and children as victims of the police department as well. Give me a fucking break.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 06:24 PM
1

Not infinite, because this stops being viable once they stop being attractive.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:04 PM
1

Thanks for posting this. Very interesting and certainly challenges the other data, as premarital sex partners is a better metric than non-martial sex partners. I thought the initial data WAS looking at premarital partners. My bad. However, as the poster of that article says, much of what we see in that data may be driven by age (that is, older women being more likely to stick around in their first marriage, which seems quite plausible, and older women have more partners than younger women). Agai…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/13 05:38 AM
-1

The reason for this is that, without game, there needs to be strong cultural pressure for relationships to last. Religion is one of the strongest. However, it doesn't necessarily mean they are happy marriages.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 04:27 PM
5

It should be noted that, from a practical perspective, it doesn't really matter whether it is having many sexual partners that leads to women not being marriage material, or whether there's something that causes both. Either way, avoid women who have had many sexual partners if you're interested in a LTR. Also, it is likely that the very high success rate of women with 0 previous partners is possibly also influenced by religious and conservative factors. Still, I would recommend any man who want…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 04:24 PM
7

I agree. I particularly feel for one of the women, because she's pretty damn close to a NAWALT (I fed her a baby version of the red pill 5 years back or so). Society lies to both men and women, and this is one of the crueler lies to women who actually want to have a successful marriage and aren't riding the cock carousel in their 20s.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 04:08 PM
1

It should be noted that, from a practical perspective, it doesn't really matter whether it is having many sexual partners that leads to women not being marriage material, or whether there's something that causes both. Either way, avoid women who have had many sexual partners if you're interested in a LTR. Also, it is likely that the very high success rate of women with 0 previous partners is possibly also influenced by religious and conservative factors. Still, I would recommend any man who want…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 04:05 PM
-9

True, but usually an alpha has little reason to support her kids, so it's an unrealistic scenario.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 03:36 PM
5

Well, I posted studies and anecdotal evidence. The studies aren't anecdotal whatsoever. I already noted that the anecdotes were anecdotal. It should be noted that men do not have the same problem with lots of sex that women showed. I agree with you that causation/correlation issues exist. Here's some more for you: http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html Of course, there are still issues. Individuals who have just one partner are likely to be religious, and re…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 03:30 PM
5

It's hard to get proof of this because of causation / correlation issues. Check out this book: http://www.amazon.com/Premarital-Sex-America-Americans-Marrying/dp/0199743282 Some very interesting research done on young adults in this book. While it can't prove the hypothesis, the data is in line with it. Some findings (which I'm stealing from an amazon review since I don't currently have the book): "Rather surprisingly, research shows those marrying between "ages 20-27 report higher levels of mar…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 03:09 PM
5

Longterm monogamy is the better strategy for beta males, but not alpha males. For women, the ultimate evolutionary success is to have kids with the alpha supported by the beta. If this isn't possible, it depends on the culture they are in which is a better option (kid w/ alpha vs beta provider). Culture clearly does shift people's views. It doesn't change fundamentals, but it does make people more amenable to 'compromising' as it were.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 02:58 PM
2

This isn't true. Unattached males in and of themselves are most certainly not wanted for being unattached. Being a badass in other ways and being unattached is great however. However, being attached to a reasonably attractive woman is a reason women will want you by itself.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 05:12 PM
6

Yeah, they went on a censorship tirade since TRP linked to their thread. I got banned for the following posts: 1 2 The only reason I can come up for these to get me banned is simply because I'm subbed to TRP. No great loss, it's r/okcupid after all.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 04:38 AM
12

If you're that fucking good at something, women will be into you. Shit, you don't even have to be that good. For instance, I'm not great at basketball, but I've played since I was young and can do some fancy moves (behind the back, through the legs dribbles, etc). When I was younger, a few girls in my friends group who had never been interested in me whatsoever saw me playing with a few friends (whom I was superior to). Their attitude towards me instantly changed, and I became a sexual being in …
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 07:22 PM
6

Women don't get paid for sex with those at the top of their list. If anything, they'll actually pay for it, although not usually with cash.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/13 04:29 PM
1

Thanks for the link. I do know about nofap and do appreciate its benefits. I have to admit I have repeatedly attempted it and that shit is hard (always get to around the 20-30 day mark). What/where is M3's story?
/r/TheRedPill17/06/13 06:06 PM
1

I don't enjoy dealing with modern sexual dynamics in the west, so I don't. However, I am going to be going abroad very soon (probably teaching english in south korea), and perhaps that will be a success story for you.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/13 06:02 PM
0

You raise a good point, although not accurate in the way you think it is. He has plenty of evidence of my ability to have women temporarily attracted to me at a bar. Every time we go out, I have women interested in me and he doesn't, and he's commented on this repeatedly. However, he wants another long term relationship (to get married again...barf), and I must admit I have no evidence of being successful there, which does lower my credibility in his eyes. Of course, I think the answer to that i…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/13 05:57 PM
1

She's simply awesome.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 08:30 PM
2

This is the argument I've always used. It's a strong one and usually is pretty effective. I also like the following: "If there was ubiquitous male privilege, they wouldn't have been saving the women and children first on the titanic. Just imagine 'Save all the men first!' in that situation. That's privilege right there."
/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter