TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tyrryt Archive

View 0 posts and 225 comments by tyrryt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How did this wind up in the global media cycle, if it wasn't submitted by deniro's team? Sounds like some kind of PR move, trying to reduce alimony payments.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/20 02:02 PM
6

Western Europe makes America look like Afghanistan. They actually take pride in being pussified, completely gynocentric, hysterical sjws. Eastern Europe, on the other hand, is luckily still 30 years behind this nightmare trend.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/20 01:54 PM
2

No, the reason they use it for advertising is because there's demand and it's scarce. If it were easy to access or plentiful, they wouldn't use it for marketing reasons. As for why prostitution is illegal, try looking at why family courts are rigged 100% against fathers, or why men live under perpetual fear of "sexual harassment" claims destroying their lives.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 05:39 PM
2

Which points indicate a lack of intelligence, specifically?
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 03:09 PM
3

He believes in enforced monogamy You didn't explain enough to be sure, but it's a good bet that you don't understand the point he was trying to make.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 03:07 PM
2

society just bombarding you with sex like US culture does. Then not letting you buy it, That's the point. If you could just buy it, it wouldn't have the same value as an advertising tool.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 02:18 PM
15

The game has changed drastically over the past 50 years. Now the game is actually Russian Roulette. Men have lost all power, while costs have been raised to catastrophic levels. Most guys keep playing and eventually wind up blowing their brains out (jailed/ruined by fake rape accusations, driven crazy by BPD psychos, caught in pregnancy trap, divorce raped and left broke and in alimony slavery for life, locked into sexless marriage with a degenerating post-wall hag, etc., etc.) Given the stakes,…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/20 05:26 PM
8

Her relationship with her parents, particularly her father.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/20 01:39 AM
8

It is prosecutable as "rape" even if there is no coercion or force, even if the woman was enthusiastically participating, or even initiating. The premise is that being drunk, alone, removes the woman's ability to control her actions. If being drunk removes the ability to control actions, then any crime committed while drunk should be non-prosecutable. However, in every other situation, being drunk is not a defense to a crime.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/20 01:38 AM
18

No, only the man is responsible, for the crime of rape, while drunk. The woman is excused from responsibility, because she is drunk. Both sexes are equal before the law, unless equality would result in an unfavorable outcome for a woman, in which case the law reverts to 17th century chivalry rules.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/20 01:32 AM
1

No, not completely - the FBI can subpoena ISP records, but that takes a criminal investigation. It's a hell of a lot harder for private companies to build a database of you, your friends, their friends, your habits, movements, purchases, etc., or for some psycho jilted woman to dox you and ruin your life, or insurance companies to deny coverage, or a woke HR dept. to fire you, if you don't hand them that information on social media. The fact that the government could in severe cases get that inf…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/20 03:39 AM
52

Never use FB, instagram, etc., use anonymous email, and never use your real identity anywhere. Funny how Internet users used to understood this, nobody gave out real ID or phone numbers - then the wide-eyed naive millenials discovered FB and just gave up all anonymity instantly. Incredibly stupid.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/20 01:46 PM
3

Find an attorney who will work on a contingency basis, and see if you can sue the school, fraternity, landlord, and the girl. Most attorneys will offer a free initial consultation, to hear the general situation of your case and decide if there's anything to go on. Call around, you have nothing to lose.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/20 01:41 PM
0

Spend more time thinking and less time bitching and snarking. "A woman with any options won't go for that" obviously means "a woman will go for it, if you are her best option". If she's 38 divorced with a kid, she'll go for it. If she's 20 and hot, forget it. And they will share an alpha, if they can't lock down an alpha by themselves. Again, if they have other options, they won't share.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/20 03:54 PM
0

A woman with any options isn't going to go for that, for long. She might play along to rope the guy in, but eventually she'll push for committment.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/20 02:54 PM
3

in a society where how much a one works and earns is largely correlated with being a successful and reliable individual. Not an "individual", only a man. Men do not base their estimation of a woman, in a relationship context, on how much she makes or has. A man marrying a rich woman for her money is a traditional target for scorn, while a woman doing so is normal, and she will be mocked for marrying a man who makes less than she. And it's not "this society" - it's every society, on every contine…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 04:42 PM
3

Agree that marriage is a certain loser for a man, but if you want to raise children right, there's no other option. Surrogate mother or fatherless homes aren't sufficient. Your only hope is to find a very, very traditional woman from a conservative house, early, and have the kids as soon as possible before she goes too berzerk.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 02:37 PM
3

Prenups don't mean much, and once kids are in the picture they're useless. The woman will always have full power and will always win in a divorce situation once kids are in the mix, no matter what contract you have.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 02:33 PM
5

Women don't get married to "lock down resources" in the overwhelming percentage of marriages. How do you substantiate a claim like that? It certainly has been the case in every marriage I am personally aware of. I don't care to look up the statistics to prove it, but it is strange how "special and irreplaceable" a guy is seems, almost, perfectly correlated to how much money he makes and/or how popular he is.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 02:21 PM
3

Be careful. In the context of relationships, they're all the same. Convincing themselves that they found the unicorn has destroyed countless men.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 02:12 PM
4

That's the beauty of the modern legal system - once she's married and/or has kids, she gets the benefits without the hassle of actually having to deal with the guy. She has no responsibility to him, it doesn't make any difference if he's happy or not or what he thinks. The money and custody are hers. That's why the monster starts showing at marriage, and really comes out after the first child. She has no use for the guy at all at that point. She might keep him around as a babysitter or errand bo…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 02:09 PM
14

In the context of relationships, they're all insane. The only variable is how much leverage she has. The insanity that she reveals/exercises is in direct proportion to the amount of leverage she has.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 02:02 PM
2

Choosing to sleep with a minor under the age of consent is a crime, but mistaking someone's age - isn't. Not sure if you're talking about statutory rape, but in most jurisdictions it is a crime, mistake or no mistake. It isn't a defense that you didn't know her age, that she consented or even initiated, or even if she outright told you or showed some type of proof that her age was over the minimum. In some places if the man is also a minor or close to the girl's age, the penalty is reduced - in …
/r/TheRedPill19/06/20 05:13 PM
2

It's also instinctual for a man to beat the shit out of another guy who has what he wants. It's also instinctual for a man to do a lot of things by force, rather than negotiation. But we lock those men in a cage and take everything away from them.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/20 03:20 PM
26

She had a reason - she saw her college friends getting male attention by banging them, and she wanted to get in on that male attention.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/20 04:06 PM
1

30 is tough for a western woman - if she's not married yet, she's either desperate to marry, or she's above-average on the psycho-meter. Either condition is toxic, it's better to stay in the 22-25 range.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/20 04:05 PM
6

One of the biggest shocks possible is searching through facebook a decade or two after graduation, seeing how time has demolished all the objects of your highschool fantasies.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/20 04:00 PM
6

The legal system has put machine guns in the hands of children. The result isn't suprising.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/20 06:22 PM
1

Too bad aircraft engines and skyscraper foundations don't give a fuck about your "perceived effort".
/r/TheRedPill28/07/18 04:38 AM
1

If she's fucking, it's because the attraction is, or is perceived to be, at risk. In the case of a real beta, there is no risk or uncertainty of her control, or no benefit to attracting him, so no fucking.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 10:24 PM
1

They like to attract attractive men, as defined by their peers. They fuck as a means of attracting them.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 10:20 PM
7

Women like to talk about who they fuck, as a form of competition. A (non-mother) woman's primary means of accomplishment is attracting men. Higher quantity and quality of attraction places her higher on the peer hierarchy. If you think they actually like to fuck, ask a guy who's been married 5 years. Once the attraction is accomplished, the "desire" to fuck vanishes.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 02:00 AM
5

My sincere condolences. It seems hollow, silly even, to write this, but I really feel for you man. Best wishes to you and your brother.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 12:35 AM
4

If you take her back, at least you can avoid surprise the next time she fucks you over. And if you've got any self-respect, you'll always resent her betrayal, no matter how much you try to rationalize it.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 12:26 AM
11

Later, OP's stepmom came home early and caught them in the shower.... Despite being a teenage supermodel world-class powerlifter, the stepmom realized hb10 was unexperienced in romance, and had to step in to teach her the ways of love.....
/r/TheRedPill01/10/17 10:12 AM
13

You sound like a tough guy. Some girls can do it, but it'd require a girl who's very dedicated to strength development - a competitive olympic lifter, powerlifter, maybe a roided bodybuilder. They exist, but there are very, very few of them, and they sure aren't hb10 gym bunnies.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/17 02:12 AM
230

LOL. A super hot woman, doing front squats, in a rack, with good form, by herself, with 85kg - 187 lb? The number of women in whatever country you're pretending to be from who can, or would want to, front squat 187 lb is in the single digits - and the number of those who are anywhere close to hb10 is precisely zero. You're either an adolescent with unrealistic expectations, or a neckbeard who's never set foot in a gym. Try more research before your next fantasy bullshit post.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/17 10:41 PM
20

The lesson is that if your fiancee says she's going Vegas with her friends, tell her she'll need to find another sucker to finance her when she gets back.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/17 07:30 PM
24

Robots don't have money, so there's no reason for women to have sex with them.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/17 04:09 AM
1

LOL. Jesus, what is this... is TRP being brigaded by tumblr?
/r/TheRedPill05/07/17 07:35 AM
5

If you cant even pay for something so small as a dinner meal, how then are you ready for a bigger level of commitment? The most female comment ever posted on TRP. Such a great blend of self-centered pretentiousness, hypergamy, spiteful greed, and obliviousness to the dynamics at play. You'll have to go back to 2chomosome or tumblr if you're looking for support for that kind of sentiment.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/17 07:33 AM
1

It's good to have superior and enlightened people to lecture the mindless savages on common sense.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/17 01:22 AM
9

The US, Russia, China, Brazil, Nigeria - all of them have tremendous resources, large populations, access to trade, etc. But one has enjoyed far greater levels of innovation, wealth, quality of life, education, etc. Why? What is the difference? Political and justice systems matter, and fucking with them has consequences.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/17 01:11 AM
6

This betrays both a childish view of "religion", and a complete ignorance of what Peterson's saying - you should try less shallow toughguy talk and more learning before commenting.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 09:09 PM
2

saying we can't be good men because womyn. You're blaming women for not being able to be self reliant and that if only we got some appreciation for our efforts, we would actually do something. It's far deeper than that. In the past hundred years we've set up artificial social restraints that are in direct conflict with the rules and behaviour systems we've followed for the prior 3 billion. Technology has allowed us to reject our nature, to try to abandon the systems that kept the species alive, …
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 09:01 PM
17

You really should listen to his lectures - he has extremely well-structured and thorough reasons for his conclusions. As for religiousness, his concept of religion refers to universal, recurring themes in human consciousness - he is not talking about obeying tribal myths or recommending adhering to the rituals of a sect. He is far, far beyond what is typically meant by "religion", and the comments in this thread dismissing him for speaking in "religious" terms demonstrate ignorance of him and hi…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 08:44 PM
11

A man's ideal is to dominate, broadly defined. A woman's ideal is to secure the committment of the dominator. The rest is details.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/17 08:57 PM
5

Something done by an Alpha that will give her the tingles will be seen as creepy if done by a Beta/Omega. "Creepy" is just code for "not of sufficient value to bang her" - it's not actually disliked, and a woman ignored by a group of betas would be as disappointed as one ignored by alphas, or by women. Even moreso, because beta attention should be easier to get.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/17 11:08 AM
2

Meanwhile the stigma, time, and legal costs of the claim destroy your life.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/17 11:02 PM
0

Victim of various "sexual abuses". "Abusive" ex-boyfriend, maybe a stalker or two.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/17 10:59 PM
5

Stop watching tv. There's nothing "manly," or feminine either, about drinking.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/17 10:15 PM
3

Jesus. It's a proverb that employs metaphor, not a literal reference to air temperature.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/17 10:09 PM
8

Possession is prohibited - without a prescription. The substances have legal uses, and the medical industry/government have decided that mutilating yourself to look like another gender, or to reduce effects of aging, are approved but trying to be stronger/bigger is not. The point is that I agree with you, the distinction is hypocritical and unfair.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 02:06 AM
11

It's not an offense to take steroids, it's an offense to buy them without a prescription. The medical industry has decided that certain cosmetic conversions are acceptable, and others aren't.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 01:34 AM
11

2020 Olympics, where pre-op transgenders will be allowed to participate for the first time. Whenever you think the sjw absurdity has bottomed out, they find a way to go even lower. Let's hope they really do try this - it would make the whole thing a laughingstock, a ridiculous farce.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 12:13 AM
1

in the library at university, there is now a group of girls (the same one each day) that look at me and giggle when I walk by. Tell them about your "toastmaster" awards and how brilliant you are, they'll giggle even louder. Jesus what a tool.
/r/seduction10/12/16 12:19 PM
1

He can't legally choose to have the child killed in utero, or to prevent such a killing. But those decisions only occur once the child already exists, and that existence is his responsibility, the result of his choice to have sex with the woman.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 12:08 AM
4

No other scenario puts any amount of ethical responsibility on him in any way shape or fashion. As fucked as the legal and political systems may be, and no matter what women, sjws and the pop media say, a father has responsibility for his children. For their existence, as well as development and support. His act produced the child, he chose that woman, he chose to accept the risk. To try to avoid it by whining and crying victimhood is to stoop to the level of the honorless cunt in the submission…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 09:02 PM
6

Women don't want a piece of carbon. They want a public symbol of wealth; and they want evidence of commitment and domination over a man to the point that he wasted his time and wealth for a useless ornament in exchange for her company.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 04:32 AM
39

AC: "How is it?" "It's really good." AC: "ok" I let it fall dead on purpose to see what he does. Half expecting him to shift around nervously. To my surprise the tall skinny guy held his frame enjoying his bagel, picked up his coffee, and left. Subconsciously thinking "good job, man" as if the guy could hear my thoughts. WTF is this nonsense? Some guy should be "afraid" because some "present in the moment" douchebag asks him how a fucking bagel is - but instead, he did a "good job" because he le…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/16 05:54 AM
10

The kicker: if the biological father showed up at her doorstep tomorrow, both her and the mother would reject the cuck instantly. Probably even compete over which of them could mistreat the cuck more in order to win favor with the biological father.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/16 07:10 PM
9

the reason that my ex was so disrespectful and walked all over me is directly down to the behavior of her mother It's not the mother's fault, it's your fault. You submitted to the cunt's behaviour, you accepted it.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/16 07:05 PM
6

You can't think your way to success. Thinking is rehearsing, it means nothing without action. You have to act, fail, and repeat until you succeed. As for "getting your life together" - that will never happen. There will always be something to do, some next thing on the list, some excuse you can lean on to justify not acting. If you wait for perfection, you'll die waiting.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/16 05:17 AM
7

Run a search for "orbiters". Nothing a woman loves more than getting the attention, validation, manipulative power, and money, without the hassle and inconvenience of having to put out. You sound hung up on this one. Best thing would be to cut her off completely, and don't play nice or make excuses when she responds with the next cockteasing. You offered, she rejected, move on. There are 3.5 billion more of them out there, no sense wasting time playing this one's games.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/16 05:08 AM
14

Fear of them not having you keeps them in line, once they have you and they know they have you, they don't give a fuck about you. That's the case with all women.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/16 05:04 PM
7

Thanks. Now I understand what he was trying to say.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/16 05:03 PM
1

Sure he's a pandering, blowhard, sensationalist marketer - but look at his competition. He's not running against Churchill or Kennedy, it's fucking hillary, a despicable woman who's only on stage because she married a president, and a bunch of whiny, weak career politicians. In a "real" election against the best and brightest, he wouldn't stand a chance - but in this sewer he's the turd that floats to the top.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 09:42 AM
2

I also hate saying this but in Mensa tests I'm inn the 99th percentile, But apparently you're not smart enough to figure out that by saying this, you've made everything else you say irrelevant.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 09:37 AM
1

The media decides elections - they decide which clips to show and which opinions to share. They paint candidates positively or negatively. When they want to tank a candidate, they go on a 2-week frenzy showing nonstop clips of Dean screaming, or Kerry on a surfboard, or pictures of Dukakis in a tank, or Hart with a slut on his lap, then haul out their squads of "experts" and "polls" to explain to everybody that they're unelectable. For now they've decided to hype trump to the nomination, maybe b…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 09:25 AM
5

There may be some, like there are some guys that have fetishes, but looking at trends and averages most are doing it for the results, not the action itself.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/16 08:45 AM
20

Of course she is trying to LTR you! Why else would she be blowing him? To exercise her neck? Because she's an altruist who just wants him to be happy?
/r/TheRedPill29/01/16 01:56 AM
26

And it sets a price on their assets, a price much lower than they like to charge.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 12:50 AM
1

So the response to finding yourself in a hole is to just keep digging?
/r/TheRedPill08/01/16 02:15 AM
2

Really, really bad idea.
/r/seduction03/01/16 12:59 AM
16

They're all looking for commitment, always, no matter what they say.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/15 09:15 PM
5

Not sure how a single woman being a nasty cunt leads to a conclusion that there is no beginning to the chain of universal causation. Perhaps a bit of an exaggeration of her importance.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 02:14 AM
7

but two weeks later coming after you like that again? Premeditated too, I don't understand why - emotional again? Attention, drama, spite, exerting control over a man, acting on emotional impulse - the same things that motivate all women.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 02:09 AM
12

It's the advanced version of the "let's take a break" ploy - keep the beta on the hook while ms. hamster tries to lock in a better prospect.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 10:36 PM
12

They might be morons, but this reaction is common to all people - they had never been in that situation, hadn't trained for it, didn't anticipate it, and the shock paralyzed them. No doubt they would've tried to help if they had time to reflect and think about it. This is why the military drills the same tasks over and over and over, until they become automatic reflexes - in a panic situation you have to act first and think later. Kudos to OP, great job.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 09:10 PM
1

If you can't refute an opponent on the merits, attack his character - it's as old as the hills.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 09:23 PM
1

Then, remember that this is what Reddit looks like. Couldn't have made a more stereotypical image if you tried. There should be a bot that posts this picture every time an SJW buzzword is posted, just as a reminder that the only response should be laughter.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 09:14 PM
-2

dude fuck difference make? dude fuck. fuck point is her fuck actions, not his fuck age. fuck teenager fuck old man, she fuck deceive fuck betray fuck manipulate. fuck awalt.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 06:22 AM
16

this type of annoying people only exists in Europe, US and developed countries Comfort is a prerequisite for feminism and all the other sjw foolishness - only when survival and basic needs are guaranteed do people resort to this nonsense to keep themselves occupied. People who really don't know where their next meal will come from or who have a legitimate fear of survival don't have the luxury of holding screeching protests over the use of the word "he".
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 04:01 AM
6

When you're making fun of a teenager who at least has a girlfriend, you really should chill out on this sub and go outside and interact with some females. The point isn't that the guy was gullible, but that the girl strung him along and manipulated him for years and years, then instantly betrayed him on a whim with a stranger.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 04:10 AM
4

All the incentives are on one side, it's a no-brainer: if they find the guy innocent, they risk a shitstorm from the sjw screeching whackos, mattress stunts, "activists" and politicians using the case for media opportunities, boycotts, etc. if they find him "guilty", nothing happens, and they pick the next sucker in line to pony up the $200k in loans.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 03:38 AM
0

either pick a better potential wife or regain your wife's respect and affection not choosing to be dishonest. LOL. You have a lot to learn my friend.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 07:26 AM
2

Like they all want a "good man" who is kind and dependable, and they all want sensitive men who share their fears and insecurities, and they just love it when men follow their hearts and work jobs they love even if the pay sucks. Right?
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 11:08 PM
1

And who invented the desire for pink ponies in the first place? Do you think there's some smoky back room full of sexist white men conspiring to push toys on girls, just for the hell of it?
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 01:35 AM
8

There is a billion-dollar industry devoted to marketing and selling toys. They sell girls toys to girls because that is what girls want, they aren't in business to lose money.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 01:32 AM
1

Seems like if you want a relationship to last more than a month there's a lot of give and take from both parties. Have you been in a long-term relationship with a woman?
/r/seduction11/12/13 09:16 PM
5

What are you arguing about - the article didn't say that men don't want power, or that women don't know what they want.
/r/seduction11/12/13 09:15 PM
5

Fine. More deep thoughts from 17 year-old overeager douchebags for the rest of us.
/r/seduction05/11/13 01:21 PM
8

I'd have said 12. "boy smell"? Surprised she didn't decorate this "article" with hearts with justin bieber's name in them.
/r/seduction14/10/13 08:59 AM
-1

Lol. Yeah, you have problems.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 03:28 PM
-10

then getting a hard dose of reality later on and running full speed into the wall makes me all tingly inside. t'is a beautiful thing to behold Why would her suffering make you feel good? Why do you find her anguish "beautiful"? It's one thing to disagree or to look at things from different perspectives, but it's a very different thing to take pleasure in people's misery and misfortune. If that's the case it's a sign of some serious problems, and you really should take a good look at yourself and…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 11:26 AM
10

You Don’t Respect The Black Men You Claim To Want This seems to be true for all women, of all races.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/13 09:09 AM
14

Even if she did like it she could cry rape. Or even if they didn't have sex at all. Best to try to weed out the whackos before putting yourself in that position, if at all possible.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/13 05:42 PM
-2

puaSenator is spot on - in your desperate need to demonstrate how ALPHA you are, you come across as needier and weaker than the boyfriend. If you want to be "alpha", to the extent that has meaning anymore, try to find out who you are -- and just be that without manipulating people and pleading for the approval of others.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/13 12:28 PM
2

A man who understands the risks involved in marriage isn't going to get married. Disagree on two grounds: first, a woman will eventually put a man to a choice if she has the power to force it - commit or break up. If he has fallen for her, he will commit to avoid losing her. He may understand the risks on a logical level, but logic and reason cannot compete with emotion if he's really taken. Second, if a man wants kids and cares about optimizing their environment he will get married. Few women (…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 06:46 PM
1

The fact that you're asking the question puts you higher than most women.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 06:33 PM
45

Gender is a social construct, anyway.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/13 01:11 PM
-2

Alphas chat with their plates right in front of their other girlfriends. Ah, is that what "alpha's do"? Do you realize that no real "alpha" would go around lecturing others on what "alpha's" are supposed to do? And talking to other girlfriends openly may work on strung-out bar sluts or extremely damaged women, but no truly high-value woman is going to tolerate that for very long. It's one thing to be ambiguous about it, but identifying them to each other will set up a showdown and a continuous s…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/13 12:44 PM
2

"Result" was intended, but "reward" could also be used with a shift in meaning. The "result" of the test is a pass or a fail - the guy is told "I was going to have sex with you, but since you did X, now I'm not". The problem is that the guy wasn't told that X was a deal-breaker until after he did it. He was never given a chance to pass her test, he didn't even know there was a test. In other words, it's not a valid reason, it's just an excuse/put-down created after the fact.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/13 11:04 PM
-4

Of course they each bear responsibility, individually. Either one, individually, could have prevented the situation, and it took decisions by each to create it. That is, they each bear responsibility - but each one having responsibity does not absolve the other. My point - again - is that each took a decision without which there would be no pregnancy. Therefore, the man is not a victim here, he has not been "backed into a corner" by a woman. He brought it upon himself. It was his decision, no ma…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 11:22 PM
-6

Sophistry and arguing for the sake of argument. FWIW, "independent," within the field of logic you have such a hardon for, has a different meaning than you ascribe. Go look it up, or don't. My point does not require that, and is clearly understandable as such. Your playing word games doesn't refute it.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 10:03 PM
-8

Unless there was deception or coercion, the decision to have sex was his. He decided to have sex, therefore she is pregnant. If he had decided not to have sex, there would be no pregancy. The pregancy was completely dependent on his decision, which was his alone to make.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 09:17 PM
4

Are you even reading what you write? Before throwing around the pretentious aggressive language, you may want to heed your own advice. I did not say "someone is charged with murder without anyone actually dying." I said: "Killing someone and being charged with murder are completely independent." The obvious example of my statement is abortion, where a child may be killed if it is younger than the statutory limit without being prosecuted. Another example is self-defense, where someone may be kill…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 09:11 PM
-3

My logic is fine. Whether the phrase "to be backed into a corner" can be used reflexively, I'm not sure - perhaps you could substitute "to paint oneself into a corner" if it makes you feel better. But it doesn't matter. The point is that he took actions which restricted his own options, and he bears responsibility for that. He is not a hapless victim of some feminist conspiracy. He is responsible because without his action, completely within his control, she would not be pregnant. Unless she dec…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 08:56 PM
-3

Killing someone and being charged with murder are completely independent. The law says a lot of things, some more reasonable than others.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 05:37 PM
3

fixed, thanks.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 05:32 PM
18

You're right, it is illogical and inconsistent. If it's murder for the mother father to kill a child in utero, it should also be murder when the mother does it.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 05:08 PM
-2

If he slipped a pill to some random pregnant woman it would clearly be murder. It shouldn't make any difference if the child you kill is yours or someone else's. The logical problem here is not in justifying a man's right to murder a child, but a woman's.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 04:57 PM
-9

He wasn't backed into a corner, he backed himself into a corner. Unless she put a gun to his head, it's his fault she got pregnant.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 04:54 PM
4

Was I not upholding my end of the deal? No, and that's why the relationship ended. She tested you out, threw some "hints" out there, and gave domesticating you a shot, and you didn't bite. As for your question - it should be obvious that men and women have sex for different reasons. If women wanted sex for sex's sake, human beings would do nothing else. Also, try to find a male strip club, or male hookers standing on streetcorners - if the motives and drives were the same you'd see a sex industr…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 09:10 PM
5

Makes sense from the lawyer's perspective. You might as well ask for whatever you can, no matter how crazy - claiming you deserve something doesn't cost anything, and who knows you might win the lottery. The problem is the perverse judges and juries that listen to these absurd claims and actually give in to them.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 09:19 PM
9

Whining and bitching instead of just downvoting and moving on lowers the quality of this subreddit even more.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 01:31 PM
6

LOL. Vile scum.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 08:55 AM
-6

If you want a bunch of self-important assholes finger-wagging and screeching hysterical false-outrage, go to /r/relationships.
/r/seduction31/08/13 05:53 AM
0

www.m-w.com
/r/seduction31/08/13 05:43 AM
4

Apparently defaulting on student loans makes them disappear... boy is she in for a surprise later. That's what beta whiteknights are for. What's a few more debt payments in comparison with the joy and fulfillment of saving a damsel in distress?
/r/TheRedPill28/08/13 05:10 AM
17

The irrationality of her ranting is confusing. It makes no sense. It resolves down to pathetic people whining and bitching for attention, going to great lengths to find insult everywhere they look. Brave feminist warrior: a feminist looks like the person in this picture. Response: yes, I agree. Brave feminist warrior: How dare you make fat jokes!?! How dare you trample on my rights!? How dare you attack me!?! The entire subject is just an absurd sham that should be treated with mockery and deris…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/13 12:17 AM
2

Notice the part about "how you pay" and "how long she sticks around" - the point is that the sexual performance will be related to the value provided. PUA game can work if you're broke, as long as there's some other value being traded to compensate for the amount of performance; but for a long-term arrangement, there'd better be money or a believeable promise of money/long-term support involved.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/13 03:18 PM
2

And she wouldn't think twice about lying to you, betraying you, stealing from you, and abandoning you as soon as she encountered someone who could offer her more money/power.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/13 01:03 PM
3

energetic spazzy confidence That works, sometimes, on superficial girls. For men, "spazzy confidence" comes across as "annoying douchebag."
/r/seduction21/08/13 12:33 PM
-1

And how does the need for a higher degree show that a Bachelors is useless? One is needed to get the other.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/13 09:48 AM
-10

This is ridiculous. Psychology as a field has a long history, and enjoys consistent demand. I know several psychologists, a few working in clinical environments, a couple others as private therapists. All of them enjoy "job opportunities," and none of them are starving due to salary. There are plenty of absurd degrees created to cash in on the student-loan scam of the past few decades, but psychology isn't one of them.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/13 04:42 AM
2

I don't. Where did I say I did?
/r/TheRedPill16/08/13 02:52 PM
25

The takeaway from this article is that The takeaway from this is the same as the takeaway from anything written by a woman: never take advice about what women want from a woman, period.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/13 06:06 PM
13

Another option is to tell her that you're trying an opening line on her, and ask if she would prefer suggestive and ridiculous or sincere and serious. Most likely she'll ask to hear both, and you can play it depending on her reaction to each. It knocks the pressure level down a notch and makes it into a game if she's open to it.
/r/seduction15/08/13 05:53 PM
5

the only thing about a man that matters is what he does and how he makes her feel. Or, many times, how her friends say he makes them feel.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/13 03:22 AM
4

no guy wants a girl who's just after his money or social status. Right, no guy wants that, and most refuse to accept it as reality. But that is reality. And the difference between belief and reality is what causes disappointment and unhappiness.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/13 03:20 AM
8

If you're concerned with impressing them, if demonstrating and proving yourself to them is still important to you, then you haven't gone anywhere. You're still under their power.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 04:15 PM
2

Yo. J. Pissant, "Common Fucking Sense and Life Experience," Journal of the Obvious, Vol. 1, p. 10 (2013). Yo.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 04:11 PM
3

If there is a hell, it consists of having to watch that video for eternity. I don't think I made it to the 3-minute mark. If you got through the whole thing, congratulations on having an iron stomach.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 04:09 PM
4

LOL. People are capable of all kinds of mental somersaults to rationalize the absurd when they want to. You spend 5 years with this woman, you give her trust and latitude, and she rewards all your "reasonableness" and "adulthood" by fucking some other dude. If you take her back, not only will you forever suspect and resent her, but she will never respect you as a man. It's only a matter of time until she bangs the next one. The situation is doomed, whether you want to believe it or not. And as f…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/13 07:51 PM
-1

If your wallet is big enough it doesn't matter how tall you are.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 08:39 AM
4

You just have to wait a bit - your friends are in the period of maximum manipulation, with the women playing compliant brides and watching over them like hawks to make sure they don't stray. Eventually the guys will come around to your point of view. If not full red-pill, at the least once the women are locked-in (marriage, kids, etc.), the situation will change dramatically and your friends will be dying for opportunities to do things on their own.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 05:58 PM
-5

Agreed - but even pulling a fraction of the bullshit she pulled is stooping too low. The guy should be above that petty, miserable behavior - the honorable way to act (honorable in the absolute sense, not in honor to her) is to be above the bullshit played by women and children. Indulging in it just pulls you down to their level.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 02:13 AM
-16

Playing immature games and creating a bunch of drama in public is kind of pathetic. Acting like a woman doesn't make you more manly.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 04:35 PM
2

How many things have you done where you were perfect at it from the first try, no practice required? No reason to expect that this should be any different - you gotta start somewhere, try and fail, learn from mistakes, then try again. Advice here would be to tone it down - you come across as way too eager and invasive. The whole thing reads like a nervous guy trying to hit on the only woman there, instead of calm and cool. Also be careful with the over the top, kino-grope-immediately advice you …
/r/seduction21/06/13 08:26 AM
9

Be rich.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/13 11:39 AM
5

Don't try to understand women. Women understand women, and they all hate each other.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/13 08:27 PM
1

She WANTS to be talked out of it and into your bed. Odds are, sure - just saying that we only have OP's side of the story, and she may have been trying to avoid him for reasons OP may not realize.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/13 05:02 PM
1

But she invited him to her place - that seems like an open enough admission that she was down for it, at least with some reservations. She may have had some reason for not wanting to go to his place - maybe she didn't want to be off home turf, or maybe she had some out/protection at her place (roomate, etc.). And for all we know it may have been legitimate - OP seems to be wound up pretty tight and overaggressive, he may have given her a weird vibe. There is a difference between calm/in-charge a…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/13 10:52 AM
1

Advice on how I could've handled it better is welcomed. Skip the text. Just leave, no explanation. Any effort you put into explaining yourself or justifying your actions is just playing into the shittest. She's fucking with you, trying to get you worked up and plaintive and whining for her to validate you - sending long messages explaining yourself is doing just that. Once she shows that she's not worth your time, don't give her any - just leave.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 08:27 PM
2

The result of the test only comes after, when it is no longer possible to pass it.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 08:20 PM
0

putting any effort at all into a genuine, authentic human interaction where both parties are of mutual value to one another Come on.
/r/seduction13/06/13 07:46 AM
1

Before anything, you need to change your perpective and lose the victim mentality. Yes, you suffered and wasted time, but that was due to your beliefs and actions - and you can reverse that whenever you want, it's completely under your control. You control how you view the world. For example, you say you're being ignored by women. One response is to blame yourself, cry and whine, wring your hands, wonder what is wrong with you, and try more things to please them. Another response is to realize t…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 06:24 PM
2

You have no idea who I am or how long I have been anywhere. And I don't know why you bother, either - what you say is nonsense. If a guy is rich enough, he can have any woman he wants. If you don't know that, you're not paying attention.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 07:27 AM
0

If you think women being attracted to money is "fn retarded" you're either an imbecile or just trying to be argumentative. As for being used for a paycheck - do you know which subreddit you're reading?
/r/TheRedPill11/06/13 08:23 PM
0

I said that if he has money, looks don't matter. I didn't say anything about love.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/13 06:13 PM
14

Then he should focus his efforts on making money. If he has money it won't matter what he looks like.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/13 01:45 PM
27

Because it sounds nicer than "prostitution".
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 07:23 PM
1

If your mindset is not altruistic, Agree, except for this part - these hysterical faux-progressive types are not altruists. They don't actually give a shit about helping anyone, and few if any would actually make any significant sacrifice to do so. These people play their silly wordgames for the ego and identity support they get by being part of the "accepted" clique, by criticizing the "other team" and getting cheered on by their peers.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 06:54 PM
1

For young overprivileged women, 25-30 lbs. (again, fat not muscle) is almost certainly a deal-breaker, unless you have money or fame amongst their peers. Tolerance increases with age, as earning and parenting potential take over.
/r/seduction27/05/13 10:30 AM
0

Unless you're very muscularly developed, that's rather overweight, by 25-30 lbs. at least, maybe more. Of course you should bother trying, you can do whatever you set your mind to. That said, if you have enough money, or high enough social value, it doesn't matter what you look like.
/r/seduction24/05/13 11:35 PM
2

Ah then I agree with you completely - there is no reason to coerce in this situation, even if it works that's only a temporary gesture. Rude people are going to continue to be rude, and overall it's better to avoid them when you can rather than wasting your energy trying to change them.
/r/seduction10/05/13 12:20 PM
2

work on accepting the things in another person that you cannot change That would be fine for people you are forced to deal with for some reason, family or boss, etc. Here instead being with them is voluntary - and you can choose to not associate with rude people. I have no desire to accept a rude woman - if she wants to be rude and attempt to insult me, she doesn't deserve my time.
/r/seduction10/05/13 11:44 AM
2

Just say, "Get off your phone when you're with people. It's rude as hell." I agree with your position, but issuing a verbal order may come across as just as rude, or a douchebag-ish move that puts her on the defensive. And telling her your reason is unnecessary lecturing. Better to just make it clear that ¡t is not acceptable by going silent or walking away if you're standing. No reason to get bitchy about it, just make it clear that you're not going to waste your time with rude people, and that…
/r/seduction10/05/13 11:39 AM
2

He's a pro football player - safe to say he's spent a few more hours in the gym than OP....
/r/seduction22/04/13 12:22 PM
11

And why the hell would you feel "stupid" or embarassed about doing that? If she tried it, and for whatever reason you refused, would you think she was "stupid"? You'd be flattered she tried. It's showing interest through an offer, nothing more - she didn't feel like it, so what. Nothing about that makes you "stupid".
/r/seduction16/04/13 11:15 PM
1

If you're a weak nerd, doing this stuff makes you look like a weak nerd trying to put on a silly show. If you're really alpha, you can sit however the fuck you want. James Bond can put his hands his pockets and look at the ground and he'll still be James Bond. Napoleon Dynamite can do muscleman poses and "pause for effect" and he'll still be a dork.
/r/seduction12/04/13 07:37 AM
0

Women want what other women want. If the competition is sufficient, all the rest hardly matters. Well played.
/r/seduction05/04/13 01:00 AM
4

OP entertained 3 women and they all apparently enjoyed themselves, positive experience all around. Meanwhile registeredinminutes is alone and ignored in front of a computer raging at strangers and pissed off at the world for not liking her.
/r/seduction05/04/13 12:57 AM
47

They're married now. Which shows that asking women that question is NOT a good idea.
/r/seduction14/03/13 09:53 AM
0

The guaranteed best way to fuck up everything with women is to listen to other women's advice about them.
/r/seduction25/02/13 09:49 PM
1

This will all seem a lot more insignificant in a few years when you graduate high school.
/r/seduction25/02/13 09:45 PM
2

30k students, assume half are women, and of that 15k only half of them "go out" - so you think 40% of 7,000, that is almost 3k women, really know who the fuck you are and what you do? Seems like you REALLY overdid the douchebag PUA caricature thing. Or more likely, 10 girls actually know you, the rest is in your head. 30k is the size of a city - you are overestimating yourself.
/r/seduction19/02/13 10:14 PM
0

"Misogyny" implies a hatred of women, which at the least is a personal attack against the speaker. The earlier comment didn't say anything about "fucked in the head" or "snatching" or "claws" - those you created to distort. Further, the statement did not say "if she doesn't care, it's because she's got pathology" - but rather that if she's having sex with someone she doesn't care about, she is doing that because of a disorder or insecurity, and that the situtation will not be a long-term one. Th…
/r/seduction14/02/13 10:13 PM
-1

Whoa, another gallant white knight rides to the rescue, wielding ad hominems, silly PC slogans, and shallow pop-media fantasy. Have you thought about how absurd your statement is? If all these "healthy" women "desired sex", this subreddit wouldn't exist - the whole thing is based on the premise that seduction is needed to secure their participation. If all these "normal" women "desired sex," why isn't there a female version of "this community"? Where are all the male strip clubs and male hookers…
/r/seduction14/02/13 10:01 PM
-1

Is that your whole argument? A ridiculous ad hominem, an exaggeration, and a silly line that says nothing? Maybe when you calm down and catch your breath you can come up with a more logical statement.
/r/seduction14/02/13 09:41 PM
-16

She was in it for the sex and was totally cool with him sleeping with other girls. There are girls out there like this. No there aren't, not in the long term. No matter what they say. If she doesn't care at all and is having sex because of some psychological disorder/insecurity, she'll do it for a while then leave. But if she does care, she is playing the laid-back approach to lure the guy in - eventually she will change her stance and not be cool with it, and require the guy to commit or lose h…
/r/seduction14/02/13 11:04 AM
3

Not harsh, just spot-on. A woman will almost never give a direct, verbal instruction - maybe because of conditioning, maybe because she fears rejection more than you do. "Snuggling" on a couch is as obvious a signal as she can produce - if you don't act on it immediately you'll be rejected and/or friendzoned.
/r/seduction07/02/13 08:56 AM
5

a chill little two bedroom place with about 8 peeps. One other thing you should never do: say things like this.
/r/seduction05/02/13 08:52 AM
0

With anything human there's no black and white, but denying that women in general are attracted to money is delusional.
/r/seduction31/01/13 11:46 PM
2

All else equal, height is a big factor. But that varies inversely with fame/money. If he's rich enough, it doesn't matter what he looks like.
/r/seduction31/01/13 08:59 AM
2

The only thing women love more than height is fame. Money helps too
/r/seduction31/01/13 08:57 AM
3

As long as he's reasonably clean and above a certain threshold (the threshold varies inversely with power or wealth), what a man looks like is not critical.
/r/seduction28/01/13 11:03 AM
5

No, people are attracted to and want to be around a guy that deliberately does not think about what he says. Makes sense. In fact, not thinking at all is the most alpha - just start spewing random gibberish and you'll magically become James Bond. It's surprising OP is able to write this much text, given how much time he must spend banging supermodels.
/r/seduction22/12/12 08:23 PM
7

The best part is that a true alpha type wouldn't listen to a beta like OP telling him how he should act. This list only has a use as one beta talking to another beta, each making themselves more beta in the process.
/r/seduction22/12/12 08:08 PM
2

And then a light bulb lit above Mcdz's head....
/r/seduction22/12/12 08:07 PM
0

So it's just a pet peeve that you are claiming is somehow a universal rule of "alpha-maleness".
/r/seduction22/12/12 08:06 PM
15

These lists always bring up a mental image of the fiance' from Wedding Crashers - the one that drinks the visine. Sort of a childish, hollywood frat-boy stereotype taken to the extreme - basically an obnoxious, self-centered, juvenile douchebag. Nobody, apart from other douchebags, wants to be around that guy for very long. That said, it will work more often than not in the short term. A sane woman will eventually run, but many will initially react quickly to accomodate the attention this type o…
/r/seduction22/12/12 07:58 PM
2

If you go for her again after this, you haven't learned much from the experience, I'm afraid.
/r/seduction19/12/12 11:52 AM
7

It might have been fun to screw with him, but in the end it would have ended in frustration. This wasn't a case of some guy moving in - she brought him in, she set it up, the guy was just a tool. It seems she wasn't into the OP, or maybe he pushed too hard and she got defensive. So she took the passive route by not responding and bringing in the friendzoned chump as a blocker. Best thing to do once you realize she's defensive is to get out, and move on to a better opportunity.
/r/seduction19/12/12 11:46 AM
18

Exactly. It's painful because we can all relate to it.
/r/seduction19/12/12 11:29 AM
5

The advice would be to go with your gut, if it feels wrong it probably is - don't let your thinking and rationalizing and the debate in your head take over. Good interactions shouldn't be awkward, stressful, and uncomfortable, and if they are it's a warning sign, no matter what your logical brain is telling you. Also, when it's time to bail, bail - don't worry about how much you've put in, or what you will "lose", because it isn't worth it anyway. Just move on to the next, more positive, opportu…
/r/seduction19/12/12 11:26 AM
5

Girls like the fruit I produce and don't give a rat's ass about how hard I worked to get here. The popular media paints a dramatic picture of burning romance based on soul-matching and deep intellect and sacrifice and selfless committment - the reality is that it's mostly based on the production capacity of a man and the physique of a woman. Those aren't the only factors, but if either is high enough, any other factor's impact is ignored; and if either is low enough, other factors are irrelevant…
/r/seduction18/12/12 12:37 PM
2

Fighting with a guy, fine. But fighting with a batshit type, it's a battle you can never win. In the end you will always, always lose, so the only variable is how much you're willing to put in before you admit it. Admitting it early is the best move.
/r/seduction05/12/12 09:19 PM
3

If she likes you, you're a guy that is interested in her. If she doesn't like you, you're a perv that is harassing her.
/r/seduction03/12/12 08:46 AM
3

If she's hot, in her 30s, and never married, that should tell you what her view of relationships is. If divorced, you'd need to get the ex-husband's story.
/r/seduction23/11/12 07:38 PM
1

Sure, some obviously love it, and many for the same reasons - it is quick, easy, and doesn't require any emotional commitment. That doesn't change the fact that it signals superficiality and immaturity. If you had to contact an important client, or schedule a job interview, or you were a doctor discussing a health problem with a patient, would you do it by "text"? Of course not - you would look like a fool. It is not appropriate for serious communication. Why wouldn't the girl also feel that way…
/r/seduction23/11/12 06:54 PM
0

They don't like you. They were going along to be pleasant and to avoid being perceived as negative, but they obviously weren't too impressed. Maybe you should try calling instead of "texting," to better judge committment and to convey that you are an adult.
/r/seduction23/11/12 10:38 AM
-5

"texting" is not plans. "texting" is for grade-school girls to gossip in study hall. It is superficial and conveys a tone of reluctance to invest in the interaction. You "text" people because you don't want to commit to talking to them. If you can't be bothered to talk to her, why should she treat the communication as serious?
/r/seduction23/11/12 10:34 AM
5

Make a lot of money.
/r/seduction23/11/12 10:27 AM
2

If you have enough money, power, or charisma (read: power to attract and control people), women don't care what you look like. If they did care, there would be fashion, cosmetics, hair, diet, etc., etc. industries for men equivalent to those for women. Instead, men who put too much effort into their appearance are derided by women as too feminine and insecure.
/r/seduction16/11/12 01:31 PM
6

Didn't the OP state that seddit helped him get to this point? Apparently it has helped him understand more about himself and to find the inner courage to develop and move forward. I don't see that as a "game" in the least.
/r/seduction21/10/12 01:20 PM
3

Congratulations. Everybody's got to start somewhere, and there's no point in dwelling on the past which you can't do anything about. Onward and upward.
/r/seduction21/10/12 01:17 PM
2

You asked for an instance, those are possible instances - of course every relationship is different, and some will accept an open relationship, some won't. Some (probably most) people can't emotionally handle an open relationship, yet they may have irreconcilable problems physically. They may know it's an option logically, but not be able to do it emotionally. The point is that it can get very messy, and with emotional matters it's better not to look for absolutes.
/r/seduction16/10/12 07:34 AM
0

Can you name one instance in which it is better to cheat than to end a relationship You can't paint anything having to do with human emotions as completely black or white. They aren't rational or absolute. As for your example, maybe in a long-term marriage with children and where the spouses are no longer compatible, but there's a desire to not separate for the kids' sake. Or if there is some sexual misfunction or a medical problem - where the physical side of things isn't working, but overall i…
/r/seduction15/10/12 12:27 PM
8

First, you have a strong aversion to coercion and you naturally assume others feel the same. This is generally not the case - most people are followers, and are comfortable being told what to do. Even if they don't like strong coercion, they will happily give power and responsibility to others when they can. Look at the number of employees vs. the number of entrepreneurs, for example - most would much rather settle for less in return for avoiding risk and the stress of making decisions. Second, …
/r/seduction11/10/12 10:09 AM
2

Absolutely - logic has no place in human emotions, for both genders. If it did, the world would be a lot simpler, and a lot less interesting too. Dr. Spock and HAL make sense, but drama and bar fights are more fun. The question is why women appear to feel the urgent need to claim that they want sex, for sex's sake, as much as men do, and for the same reasons men do -- which just doesn't fit with reality. It would make more sense to admit that the two are doing it for different reasons and with d…
/r/seduction05/10/12 10:47 AM
3

Wearing clean, occasion-appropriate clothes makes sense. But obsessing about fashions and looking like you put too much effort into it comes across as insecure and feminine.
/r/seduction05/10/12 08:09 AM
6

Apparently you don't understand. If a woman wants sex every bit as much as a man does, as is claimed over and over by women on reddit, then a man cannot "objectify" her by wanting to have sex with her. She cannot be an "object," because she is participating with the same desire he is. If, on the other hand, she is engaging in sex with an expectation that the man perform some other act; or she stops engaging in sex if the man stops the other act; then it is a transaction, and she could be objecti…
/r/seduction04/10/12 12:45 PM
1

This entire subreddit is based on the notion that all women want Conan, no matter what they may say or even think to the contrary. Saying you're not interested in those women is sour grapes, AFC-type justification for not getting them. As for texting, I agree that the motive wouldn't be the judgment of others - but of yourself. It is a silly activity, pushing little buttons to write long vulgar messages designed to be shared with the woman's friends - the classier version would be to deliver the…
/r/seduction04/10/12 12:32 PM
2

No disagreement there - in this case his goals weren't exactly aligned with the best interests of the country. But that his particular goals were misdirected doesn't refute the general idea.
/r/seduction04/10/12 08:26 AM
24

Why does he have to "spend sweet time with no sex"? That is, why does he need to "put in his hours" without sex? Is it in return for the sex - is that how he "pays" for the sex? Women, especially on reddit, seem to be very eager to proclaim that they love sex, that both partners want the same things, etc. - but statements like yours suggest that it is a transaction, they are trading sex (which the man wants) for submission and obedience (what the woman wants).
/r/seduction04/10/12 08:20 AM
0

Seemed to work for george bush - a guy who apparently had little ability, knowledge, or success was able to command the most powerful nation on Earth for 8 years based primarily on his habit of never admitting any doubt.
/r/seduction04/10/12 08:13 AM
7

In a fucking text message, no less. Not a traditional alpha communication format, but maybe a sign of the times. Still, the idea of thumbing erotic messages into a tiny telephone for half an hour doesn't exactly evoke images of Conan the Barbarian.
/r/seduction04/10/12 08:08 AM
2

It's simpler than that. The key realization is that others' opinions of you have no meaning other than what you give them. Are you afraid and scared shitless of being laughed at by a toddler? Of course not, a toddler's opinion of you doesn't hurt you because you don't give it importance. And the same for somebody at a bar - who cares what they think? If they are someone you value, then their views may be important to you - but otherwise, they can think well or badly or nothing at all, it makes n…
/r/seduction03/10/12 02:11 PM
3

Indeed, the only thing that fulfills us as human beings is action done for the betterment of others. Truly selfish people are universally unsatisfied and miserable. A separate question is how, or whether, the value of such action is modified by the amount of self-sacrifice involved - that's a much more difficult one to answer.
/r/seduction30/09/12 10:26 PM
1

Agreed. Move on.
/r/seduction10/09/12 10:10 AM
3

Move on.
/r/seduction02/09/12 12:32 AM
2

I didn’t fail ten thousand times. I successfully eliminated, ten thousand times, materials and combinations which wouldn’t work. - Thomas Edison
/r/seduction02/09/12 12:12 AM
3

I get that it's not your idea, but sloppy does have a point about living as a child. If you accept being infantilized, you going to be affected by that in some ways - simply knowing that you are not in control of your own actions and must act as a child under authority is going to restrict and limit you. I don't know how that relates to being ready for sex or not. But taking a victimhood line about it (it's your mother's fault, economics forces you to live like a child, etc.) is definitely very …
/r/seduction20/08/12 09:38 PM
2

When a situation seems too good to be true, look for the catch. There is always a catch.
/r/seduction19/08/12 09:20 PM
3

It's a movie quote. On reddit, quoting movies is apparently funny.
/r/seduction18/08/12 11:28 PM
0

basically admitting that many, some, most women never grow up. If so, we are so screwed. Yes, yes.
/r/seduction18/08/12 11:21 PM
40

Almost all women have self-esteem issues (along with most guys). And generally, the more attractive a woman, the more she has associated her sense of value with her looks, which are subjective and temporary - meaning she has even worse self-esteem issues. This has always been the case, and the only cure for it would be to change human nature. These "techniques" you criticize are discussed here because they work. They apparently work because there is a large discrepancy between what women want an…
/r/seduction18/08/12 01:25 AM
-1

I'd bet there are very few in France, far, far fewer outside of France, and only one person reading this page that give a fuck.
/r/seduction14/08/12 08:35 PM
6

Anyone who is only with you when the times are good is not someone you want to share your life with. Prosperity makes friends, adversity tries them - Publilius Syrus In fairness, this is true for most people, men and women alike. The difference is that hot women have more options, and are generally extra insecure.
/r/seduction24/07/12 10:32 AM
2

That's backwards. She may be good at hiding it, but the hotter she is, the more insecure she is, and the more she needs you.
/r/seduction24/07/12 10:00 AM
-1

It is a pleasant idea, but not supported by reality - if women wanted/needed it as much as guys, there would be a lot more strip clubs for women, there would be male hookers standing on street corners, the porn industry wouldn't be geared primarily for men, and nothing would ever get done because everyone would be constantly occupied having sex. More realistic would be to say they may like it as much, but more selectively, or in certain restricted circumstances.
/r/seduction26/06/12 10:19 AM
1

Got to learn to walk before you can run. Try, learn, try again.
/r/seduction20/06/12 11:43 AM
2

Im not going They sound like an idiot
/r/seduction14/06/12 10:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter