TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ukraniankranium Archive

View 20 posts and 326 comments by ukraniankranium on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
137

CMVukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 05:50 PM
35

Post for Modsukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 07:01 PM
34

CMVukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 11:38 PM
19

Discussionukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 08:38 PM
12

Discussionukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 03:14 AM
5

Question For Womenukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:23 PM
4

ukraniankranium/r/askTRP28/02/20 10:47 PM
4

Discussionukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 06:44 PM
3

Question For Menukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 07:44 PM
2

CMVukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 07:57 PM
2

Discussionukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 10:42 PM
1

Discussionukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 04:49 AM
1

Discussionukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 03:31 PM
1

Discussionukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 03:36 PM
1

Post for Modsukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 03:58 PM
1

Question For Womenukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 03:41 PM
1

CMVukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:23 AM
1

ukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 04:14 PM
0

Discussionukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 12:58 AM
0

Question For Womenukraniankranium/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 03:26 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Nah. Ugly women are usually very polite.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:24 PM
2

Enjoy.... the... decline?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:37 AM
2

I don't "hate" women but I've been accused of it. I would say I have contempt for women, and I don't think much has changed. I just stopped selling myself short. I have much higher requirements for myself, I call it self respect. I used to waste time trying to make every woman like me by being harmless, basically a betafag. Genuinely enjoyed interacting with them and being liked. I distinctly remember other "asshole" guys use to avoid me at parties. It took me a long time to realize why. Women l…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:15 PM
0

It's not like I'm out partying. I'm road tripping in the middle of nowhere. It's just idiotic how far they're taking this. Beaches? I get it. Shut'em down. A golf course? This was all supposed to be to have hospital beds open. And our hospitals in our state are cleared out, they laid people off. It's hysteria, 100%.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 09:01 PM
3

Black FDSers
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 08:59 PM
3

Doing wifey stuff for men who arnt their husbands. Good point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 06:19 PM
0

Oh noez I'm risking a 1% mortality if I get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 06:18 PM
0

I'm in my 30s, there's less than a 1% mortality rate. I'm just an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 06:17 PM
-1

Because as conservatives we're still going out and not worried about it. Went on a roadtrip all week last week.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 07:43 AM
1

Because every single time I've ever looked into any of this stuff they're all exercises in semantics. Child abuse is deplorable, but total GIGO situation with data I'm not vested in. Until women are ready to start compiling data in honest ways I don't take any of that stuff seriously. e.g. 1/4 women will be "sexually assaulted" on campus. What does that really mean? Turns out the bar is as low as "unwanted touching." Turns out I've been "sexually assaulted" about 50 times in my life. Stupid shit…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:43 AM
1

Who are all going to have child molesters diddle their kids. lol okaaaaayyyy
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:39 AM
1

We're not talking about single moms but anyways since you ejected your point is weak and stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:36 AM
1

define sexual abuse, and what's the gap between reports and "estimates?"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:33 AM
1

What makes you think demand wouldn't be consistent?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:29 AM
1

Define sexual abuse and what are the reasons they think it "doubled?" I highly doubt it has increased in any way. It's likely been consistent through time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:26 AM
1

And what percentage of kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:23 AM
1

Did you know dying by being eaten by a shark is 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 (there's a bajillion zeros to add here) times more probable than being abducted by an alien?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:20 AM
2

https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/images/probability-line.svg Again, do you understand the probability of such a thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:16 AM
2

https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/images/probability-line.svg
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:12 AM
3

So you're an attention whore?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 11:26 PM
1

Road tripped last week and posted pictures for liberals on facebook. They were melting down lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 11:25 PM
1

Like I said, self respect is fine. Most women confuse this with being a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 11:23 PM
3

Women are mind readers now, amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 11:20 PM
1

Self respect is fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 11:18 PM
2

No. I think most women are losers who deserve to be treated like trash.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 11:11 PM
3

I do, which is why I like these women. Relationship feels natural.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 11:08 PM
0

Lots of women get literal dopamine from pleasing men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 11:01 PM
1

What if she has a genuine pleasing orientation?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:53 PM
3

In my experiance the trait is related to having a "maternal" orienation. They get pleasure from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:52 PM
2

Women literally select. Your statement makes no logical sense. It is impossible for men to make women select anything other than what they choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:50 PM
2

I wouldn't even say most men have a preference outside of "willing to have sex with them."
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:48 PM
1

That's like telling me to think about what a fish thinks about before taking bate. I don't really care. I just like women with aggressive pleasing orientations. And was interested to hear why women don't like these women or what they "lose." There are a lot of valid points in this thread. I think most of it has to do with boundaries and so I wonder once you remove that element what they "lose." ​ E.g. Cool girl that has boundaries, what does she lose?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:47 PM
3

But if she has a pleasing orientation for men, then she's a "cool girl."
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:43 PM
2

Women can resent men and still fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:41 PM
4

Women don't want simps though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:41 PM
4

You realize really fast that being that way attracts men who are going to hurt you, physically, sexually, and mentally. When people see a doormat they're going to step on it. Good point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:39 PM
3

A woman with an aggressive pleasing orientation that puts her man's wants above her needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:39 PM
1

It would be good for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:38 PM
1

I love women like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:37 PM
4

What if there's commitment for her?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:10 PM
2

DBs are from a lack of attraction and masculinity. Unrelated. But you bring up a good point these relationships won't appeal to agreeable men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:10 PM
1

So when you take away boundaries from a pickmeisha you get a cool girl? That makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:08 PM
3

Daddy's have to take care of their littles.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:04 PM
1

Nothing, that's my point. What exactly does that say about the people posting about it? But I have to pick it apart some more. The boundary thing is a valid point IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:03 PM
1

They're projecting a lot and the 50\50 thing makes it pretty clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 10:00 PM
2

I love pickmeishas though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:47 PM
2

It appears so, but most users are focused around boundaries. Which is understandable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:45 PM
2

Thank you. I will start another thread tomorrow. It seems like boundaries are the only issue, not actually "pandering."
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:44 PM
3

Women don't want beta simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:44 PM
2

So you lose yourself to your man?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:43 PM
0

I actually compared them to male "douchbags"\"intentional chads."
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:41 PM
1

Well then relatedly a pickmeisha is a fake concept that doesn't apply IRL?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:39 PM
3

What I find confusing is these features are attractive to me in a woman, but as a man these features are vagina repellant.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:38 PM
3

I didn’t get with weak beta males though, those are gross even to pickmes B R U T A L
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:07 PM
3

If she has boundaries, what now?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:06 PM
9

> just like simps and orbiters do for the opposite sex Yeah but women don't fuck these guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 08:59 PM
2

Add boundaries, now what?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 08:52 PM
0

https://www.nairaland.com/attachments/10808081_pickmepenelope_jpegf642b1b80729573a73eef30845d2c76d ​ Look through the hyperbole. Because only bitter women write about them, so the definitions are always pretty insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 08:44 PM
13

How am I supposed to report everything Helanic Cat Lady posts? It'd be a fulltime job.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 07:09 PM
19

How is a woman posting "men are shit" in 1000 variations and saying they'll never date again not just femcel content?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 07:08 PM
0

Point is pretty clear, calling it pseudoscience is idiotic. It's a formal compilation of information about putting your penis inside of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 03:54 AM
0

There you go with all that weaselwording again.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 03:48 AM
1

Hey come on now, if those guys just respected women they'd have drowned in women. And to be fair, Einstein was a certified poon hound in his day.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 03:32 AM
2

Practical use, obviously. Information on how to get pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 03:30 AM
1

Where does any of that say it's "science" or "scientific?" You're projecting your own standards of evidence ontop of normal people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 02:24 AM
1

The "pseudoscience" critiques come from the vague references to cherry-picked results from Evolutionary Psychology studies, bad Tinder experiments and OKCupid graphs, riddled with tons of anecdotes. So definitely not presented as science then. That's a lot of weasel words, holy moly! It's enough to give the vague impression of "guys this is science!" when it isn't. There's no peer-reviewed paper with a controlled experiment A/B testing Red Pillers vs Blue Pillers with women. But that illusion of…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 02:19 AM
1

Sperm Wars and Sex at Dawn are pseudoscience. Agree. Just about all of Rational Male is pseudoscience. Probably more realistic to say it's just sloppy philosophy. But open to hear more from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 02:17 AM
1

they’ve provided no such evidence. Only that all of us agree through our own shared experiences. Literally a hundred thousand of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:38 AM
0

The OP is addressing that using science (and calling all other approaches "psuedoscience") as the only way to solve problems in your life is not only impossible, it's ridiculous. But I see these arguments constantly from blue pill users.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:36 AM
1

So you would agree that TRP is the most useful approach for a man who wants to increase the amount of casual sex in his life?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:34 AM
1

So why do you think it's "pseudoscience?"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:33 AM
1

Correlation doesn't equal causation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:32 AM
0

Can you link anything in TRP's sidebar that would make it "pseudoscience?"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:31 AM
1

The question isn't actually literal ;p
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:31 AM
1

Do you think TRP is "psuedoscience?"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:30 AM
0

This is the difference. Your interpretation of reality is yours and yours alone. Science looks for the objective reality, absent of any subjective interpretation. I don't begrudge anyone their own interpretation, but if they can't prove it to be objective yet claim it is, it's immediately suspect. So how would you want an argument of how to convince your girlfriend to engage in a threesome or let you sleep with another woman to be presented? Does it need a disclaimed on the top that says "this i…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:29 AM
1

So you would agree calling TRP pseudoscience is absurd?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:25 AM
0

Read it again, bucko.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:24 AM
1

What about how to convince my girlfriend who doesn't want to do threesomes to engage in one?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:24 AM
1

Correlation doesn't equal causation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:19 AM
1

Citation?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:15 AM
1

This isn't science.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:15 AM
1

That's not peer reviewed science. That's just anecdotal experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:11 AM
1

Citation?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:09 AM
0

Yes. Because TRP is "pseudoscience."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:05 AM
3

Technically, not wrong. And lol I didn't safeguard this answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 01:04 AM
1

No job okay? Obesity okay? GED okay? Just Highschool diploma okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:50 PM
2

Does he need a job? Body: fit and muscular. 5% Politics: Men that discuss politics more than the normal amount are feminine. Trump and Obama both come off like a female to me, for example. Men into gender politics, feminism, Men's Rights, etc are all feminine to me. Didn't vote camp is probably best. 32% Social status: High social status indicates homoromantic attraction and feminine traits to be validated by people, if not, it is either an obsession with women which is feminine, because he has …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:49 PM
2

Because women will just claim it's not important, so it can be added later. It's 15% if I remember. They'll just say "height isn't important." Even though it obviously is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:41 PM
2

Fair enough, he actually might be obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:19 PM
1

So obese men are okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:17 PM
1

Living wage at least 57.13% by your def Not obese 68.2% Moderate* 68% *I think adding both r\d together or using "voted" are about the same as moderate, which seems to be different than my "not extreme." So I think it's a good number. Help is a little more tough. Looks like around 20% of people at least volunteer, straight up. Looking into this, this is hard to quanitfy. But I think 20% is not a bad number either. That's shoes hit the pavement 20%, not say they're a good person and not follow th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:14 PM
8

m\30s\red A failed relationship is a failure. I remember barely anything good from them and really got nothing except the experience out of it. At least with casual ONS there's nothing in, and you get the same out. A couple mental memories. So for me personally, laying 10 women is like having 10-15 years of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:58 PM
2

So no income required? High school diploma? Is 6' preferred?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:54 PM
1

Can you elaborate on political? I'm assuming you just don't want someone extreme if both sides are fine. Because only one of those two actually greatly decreases the suitor pool. Where as "just not extreme" keeps most suitors. Other: High morals with good character and empathy for others backed by actions of charity. This is tough to quantify, any ideas?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:53 PM
1

As stated I'm accounting for confounding variables with a buffer. It's rough math. Feel free to actually lodge a dispute on the numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:32 PM
0

Entitlement is a separate topic. This thread is about understanding male ego and expectations in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 03:59 PM
1

That is absolutely not true. This is the second thread because the first one everyone just talked about anal. Do you think I posted this under other names?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 03:50 PM
1

So I can't tell the users they don't understand the OP and then make it easier to understand? Do you just want me to submit it without the tongue in cheek?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 03:46 PM
3

This is taught indirectly, absolutely. If you don't find red pilled family or friends, the feminine institutions in life will preach to you that life is fair and that everyone just wants to love the real you. If this wasn't true, the red pill wouldn't even exist. The red pill teaches you that none of this matters and it's all about how masculine you are. If that was "no big deal" the sub wouldn't be quarantined. It's also why a large number of users at TRP were brought up by single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 03:45 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 03:02 PM
1

You're missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 02:44 PM
1

It doesn't even matter. Substitute "man most attracted to"for str and "man settled for" instead of LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 02:33 PM
1

🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 02:28 PM
1

You're missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 02:28 PM
1

That's not even what I asked you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 06:58 AM
1

Do you believe that men who you have LTRs with deserve to be treated as well, sexually, as men you had STRs with?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 06:33 AM
1

Do you think Brad's deserve to be treated by a woman the same as she has treated her Chad's, more or less?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 05:53 AM
1

That's not the op is about. It's about when women offer more of themselves to a man they're more attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 05:06 AM
1

Sort of. More or less we're talking about how Chads are treated and whether or not Brads deserve to be treated as sexually well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 04:34 AM
1

You haven't even read the OP obviously, it isn't even about anal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 04:28 AM
3

Thread isn't about things you "don't want to do" but about things you "no longer do."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 04:11 AM
1

And of course women who "would never do anything I don't want for a man" this isn't really a very noteworthy discussion to make, ey?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 04:10 AM
1

You do realize as stated in the OP this isn't really about anal, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 04:10 AM
2

From the new new bible dickhead.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 11:25 PM
-2

Do you think Brads deserve to be treated liked Chads? e.g. Do you think it'd be unreasonable for future, more agreeable partners, maybe less attractive partners, to expect the same treatment?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 11:06 PM
4

Hot take!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 11:05 PM
1

Do women do more for someone they're attracted to? Damn right they do. Potent!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 11:02 PM
1

Definitely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 11:01 PM
1

"my body"....
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 06:55 PM
5

Good answer
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 06:45 PM
2

Excluding ugly men who expect Stacy or violent types.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 04:16 PM
5

Yes. Expecting porn sex is one example.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 04:15 PM
1

This is how women see a relationship that isn't tilted into her favor. This is also how feminist weirdos see traditional relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 03:43 PM
1

In any other scenario that doesn't involve women, people would think this example is preposterous. This is what you call mental gymnastics. Obviously, 80% of men are not "unattractive."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 03:39 PM
1

That one cycle was written by a woman, haven't checked into Campbell's yet. I suspect hers is more applicable IRL since she wrote it as a therapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 03:11 PM
1

How so for well adjusted men in the smp?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 03:05 PM
1

How so for well adjusted men?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 03:04 PM
1

It begins with the breaking away from feminine ideals and the turning towards the patriarchal values.Then comes the experience of spiritual death, and turning inward to reclaim the power and spirit of the sacred feminine. The ending stages consist of union of both the masculine and feminine values 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 03:03 PM
1

Can you describe examples of women with non-reactive libidos?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/20 12:56 AM
1

Thanks gents. Will tell her things have gotten too far off track and for her to get back in contact after she sorts herself out... maybe.
/r/askTRP29/02/20 12:36 AM
1

I award you a delta, I was wrong about the logical fallacies and science!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 11:54 PM
1

GROSS, stop shoving gayness in my face. disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 11:53 PM
1

I don't talk about homosexuals at all. Not interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 11:33 PM
0

3.7/10 buttmad
/r/askTRP28/02/20 11:32 PM
1

I don't know or care about anything homosexuals do. I don't know why everyone is constantly talking about homosexuals in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 11:09 PM
1

Joseph Campbell is the one who wrote the book, you're just wrong. But thanks for helping me conceptualize what the differences are, on some level. I'll take a look at some of the differences he sees. That's what I'm interested in, not this PC gobly gook that "everyone is actually the same."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 11:01 PM
1

Might want to tell that to the author of that, who separated them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:54 PM
1

Female hero journeys, interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:49 PM
1

Women to be adored in a non-sexual manner. Have you ever read any content about this? Books or otherwise? Seems interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:28 PM
1

You're right, I meant to say China. Where women if they can't find a man who will pay for their lifestyle will just forgo dating altogether. ​ Do you think that plays into this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:23 PM
1

What do you think the mechanisms where of those pairings? Much higher SMV, chemistry etc? /u/atlas_b_shruggin
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:22 PM
1

Obviously, that argument is completely worthless. Some men called bug chasers look for women with HIV\AIDS to get it. And would feel elated a woman would give it to them. Obviously the question is about GROUP VALUES. Are you able to see any differences in group values that are not translatable? It sounds like you think if you took a book of "how to seduce a man" and removed all references that make it gendered, you think it would work.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:21 PM
1

I agree that isn't entitlement. I do think the inherent requirement to be made to feel special from the man pursuing her, in order to engage her sexuality is innately entitled though. Another user posted the economics of it, which was a great way to look at it, because basically, they are special, economically speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:16 PM
1

Can you stop talking about homosexuals please. I can't understand any of that. I'm asking if you have insight into the differences between male and female sexual dynamics. Not anything about gays. Or how someone feels. Do you think men, who are well adjusted (e.g. not violent, or slutshaming etc, no incel, mgtow etc types), have entitlement in the SMP, and if so, what?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:11 PM
1

No, I mean men from women. Are you able to tell the difference between the way they feel special and what their expectations are. Because obviously men and women wouldn't not feel the same if you took a man or woman's playbook and flipped it. They have different things that make them feel good. And men and women have different expectations in the SMP.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:07 PM
1

So you agree, entitlement is likely inextricable from female sexuality. How do you think this plays into places like Japan?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:06 PM
1

Are you able to differentiate what makes men and women feel special and what their expectations are?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 10:00 PM
1

Okay I'm not talking about weird homosexual economics here. Do you have any insight into male vs female sexual dynamics? Is there a reason you think any well adjusted man (e.g. one who doesn't get violent or slut shame) has entitlement in the SMP where a woman doesn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:59 PM
1

Well we're talking about sex with men, not masturbation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:56 PM
1

So you think men and women have the same sexual behaviors and expectations?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:49 PM
1

You give deltas to people who change your mind. I was debating wrong, with the logical fallacies and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:47 PM
1

Right, but for the well adjusted men, do you find anything entitled about their sexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:45 PM
1

Ok you get a delta!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:42 PM
1

If the men aren't violent, what is entitled about men in the SMP?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:42 PM
0

I award you a delta!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:41 PM
0

This is the best reply of the thread by a thousand miles. So how do you think this plays in with someone who has no access to the top 20%, like SMV3 woman or something. How is her sexuality expressed? Do you think an SMV5 man makes her feel that way?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:38 PM
2

Ok, for the sake of discussion every male in the world is SMV5 and makes the first move. They have a high school degree, are slightly overweight and have all the other typical middle of the bell curve features. None of these men come up with any romantic angle, they just make moves. What does this world look like in terms of female sexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:31 PM
1

What makes heterosexual male sexuality entitled?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:21 PM
1

Sorry I don't understand how this relates to the CMV outside of one of those weird "men do it too" things. I don't know anything about LGBT stuff or whatever, I'm just trying to have a normal discussion without devolving into weirdo gender debates. I'm trying to talk about something inherent to female sexuality. Which I don't agree in any way is the same as male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:19 PM
1

Isn't that sort of a reach that someone needs to be present to be entitled? Isn't that just a circular "all people are entitled" cop out?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:15 PM
1

What do you think a woman's sexuality would be like without men who make her feel special?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:15 PM
1

Debate it using your broad interpretation of it, from any angle.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 09:13 PM
1

Yes, and even worse so when you're in a relationship and you realize the idea that you are in a cooperative is a temporary illusion. If you actually try to get a woman to address problems she brings to a relationship, really make her do it, and not turn it around on you, well, good luck. From my perspective, women view relationships as a one way cooperation. Us vs them was a nice blue pill view, it was comforting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 08:45 PM
2

Is a woman's desire to be made to feel special from a man or men, inextricable from her sexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 08:42 PM
1

And you get a Delta! So... if we were to say that women have a lot more preferences, which they expect, would it be possible for women to still be sexual if men stopped responding to these en masse? e.g. Men did not treat women as special, did not care about their wants\needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 08:41 PM
2

What's a woman without a reactive sex drive like? Are these swinger\prostitute types?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 08:24 PM
-1

Feeling special or entitled is something both genders do. Replies that agree with the CMV have to go under automod.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 08:17 PM
0

Expecting to be treated as special.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 08:12 PM
2

u/atlas_b_shruggin what do you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 08:10 PM
2

“Special” as in they’re special to the man pursuing them. Delta What if women overall didn't feel special from any man anymore? Could they be sexual?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 08:05 PM
1

Thread had to be resubmitted per mods. Check the new thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 08:03 PM
0

I don't think anyone on here is interested in a debate on logic fallacies. I'm wondering what your opinion is on the point we're discussing. Whether or not entitlement is inextricable from female sexuality. What would female sexuality be like in a world where women didn't feel like men valued them?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 07:32 PM
0

Well I mean that was the purpose of the OP. If a woman's sexuality is tied to her feeling special, can she be sexual and not feel special?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 07:17 PM
1

This is an interesting perspective. So you suppose in a hypothetical future if women didn't feel special they would just sell their bodies?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 07:09 PM
2

You could interpret the OP to mean what if no women were special to men then.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 07:08 PM
1

Interesting perspective on the N debate. How do you make a woman with 30 partners feel special?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 07:07 PM
1

Elaborate please
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 02:01 AM
6

It's not logically surprising at all. Just that most institutions don't really want to confirm such an inconvenient truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:23 PM
2

Most people are boring and predictably monogamous. Confirmation bias and internet echo chambers create a false impression of generalized truths that really only impact the minority (like jaded cops who think all people are scum). Study after study of human behavior in aggregate suggest this to be true. You still didn't actually put your neck out there. I understand you think there is a confirmation bias, I'm asking what you think is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:18 PM
3

I'd rather go for a man with a non perfect face, who has a naturally passive personality that compliments mine. Well if it presents itself the point is obviously you'd want the guy with the better face who is less dominant.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:16 PM
1

Which exists. Are you arguing increasing these traits would not increase the pool of suitors for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:14 PM
2

What is reality in your view? Do you have a solution for men who aren't interested in cooperating with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 07:14 AM
2

My point is you’re not actually blue pill. So why reject rp? Tonality? Moralfag? Trendfag?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 04:53 AM
2

You’re not blue pill just anti-rp Too rational and accepting of generalization. Not autistic or moral enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 04:44 AM
3

Their awful argument to this will be "women are all different, and their preferences are a combination of biological and mostly sociological influences. RP is a bunch of pseudoscience. Dress better, get a haircut. Being in shape is good, but some women like men who aren't. Not all women are like that. Find a high value woman." All fluffy well meaning stuff that won't guide men in the right direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 04:33 AM
3

Less ugly ;p
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:58 AM
5

What you're asking for is for me to make pointless arguments against myself. We all spent years on the other side of this. There are no correct bp arguments. The best you can do is being overly skeptical, or be a male romantic. That's why I said try me. Give me your best RP counter argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:58 AM
3

Nice try with your "meta" blue pill budday. Try me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:50 AM
1

Okay great, do you have an answer to that question?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:48 AM
4

Being blue pilled was fuckin' awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:17 AM
0

Right, that's what I'm pointing out. That "in some cases" isn't an argument against, but for these traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:16 AM
4

This is young person shit. It might matter if you're 20, but if you're in your 30s and lol at that request all you're telling her is you're not 20. I've been using the same phone number line since I was 16. I have never gotten a fake number. If anything it's gotten easier over time now that women don't expect to have someone ask for their number they don't have all the objection game they had before. For all you youngin's here's how it goes. Are you (AREA CODE 1) or (AREA CODE 2)? Everyone has 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:10 AM
2

Why be red pill when you can be a good guy? Getting laid isn't that important. Having a good sex life isn't that important. Why would you want to have a bunch of sex with women you barely even know if you mostly have to be a bad person to get it? Wouldn't you rather just be more approachable, the kind of guy that women want to be friends with?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:08 AM
5

And I’m not an ugly chick. I’m reasonably attractive. I just like ‘em weird looking. This is the point of the thread. Women think there is a wide variety of what is attractive, but there's a large consensus, and a small number of outliers. It'd be like a men's magazine saying "women are into all sorts of men, don't worry about being feminine, overweight etc." Like yeah, I'm sure if you look hard enough you can find weirdo women who will love you for "who you are" but it's a terrible tactic to lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:03 AM
2

Right, but you're confusing the OP. Subjectivity works as you list, but it doesn't mean that your "preferences vary." That's the OP. It's pointing out that subjectively you don't find this man attractive. But increasing these traits makes him more attractive to more women. Your preferences are still going to be shared with other women, just that subjectivity is what separates you two. You're not going to look at a guy you like and say "I'd like this guy shorter, with less facial symmetry and a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 02:58 AM
3

Do you disagree with the premise that if you took an average male and increased his height, made his jawline stronger, increased strength and dominance that his partner count would be higher? And do you think his partner count would be higher than that example if he was chubby or heroin like or just a normal black dude or a red head?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 02:55 AM
2

Thank you for simplifying my OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 02:54 AM
1

Are you disagreeing with the premise that increasing the traits listed would best broaden a man's pool of sexual suitors?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 02:53 AM
4

Men : Yes, we agree with this. Women : We are all unique, the most special snowflake. My boyfriend....
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 02:52 AM
1

So what features should men focus on if they want to increase the number of women who want to have sex with him, rather than to have him as a husband?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 02:51 AM
3

No idea because they stopped measuring the effect at 7' tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 02:50 AM
9

Right, that's this thread in a nutshell. If you believed women, you'd be chasing your tail.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 02:50 AM
3

Status is much less powerful than facial symmetry for short term mate selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 12:03 AM
6

Last study I read on it stopped measuring at 7' and the effect was still increasing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 11:46 PM
1

why you were willing to spend time with her without receiving sex? When you're blue pill, you believe that you're "getting closer to her." Would it be fair to say that any woman that you don't orbit without sex in the future is less special to you than this woman was? It's more fair to say that after you stop being a male romantic this is true of all women in a way. Women you orbit, how you view women before unplugging is referred to as "pedestalizing" them. That's where the idea of "unicorns" o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 11:46 PM
1

Yes it does. It's studied.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 04:38 PM
1

Are you capable of understanding the point of this discussion? Women are not attracted to scientists, they don't think it's more attractive than a roofer.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 04:18 PM
1

Today you learned what jargon is. 👍🏻
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 03:07 PM
2

This is also an underrated comment
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 02:14 PM
2

He's right. Women so settle down with Brad's. They divorce them too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 02:14 PM
1

Ewww
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 02:13 PM
1

It's jargon
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 01:51 PM
1

Most of the people making these arguments have been through this charade enough. It's her fault and her filing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 05:16 AM
2

Just what I want to do when it's time to get intimate... sit down and exchange documents.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 05:14 AM
1

“They like the best? Well, time to get better.” And then what? Be SMV8 with a 6 who gets insecure and cheats. Or with an 8 that cheats with a 9? Or maybe she just gets bored and accuses you of abusing her. The more you learn, the more you just realize the game is rigged and then you don't really feel bad being a dickhead anymore. When you learn about hypergamy you basically just learn that women are unmanageable. Blah blah "make your time beautiful..." Just crazy to know everything they say is o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 04:52 AM
5

Everytime I see your comments you're jerking yourself off so damn hard. Stop it, it's gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 04:49 AM
1

Right. Neurotic chodes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 03:03 AM
1

You can always try and mold him 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 02:59 AM
2

Read
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 01:22 AM
2

Underrated comment here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 12:30 AM
9

Actually women select against raw intelligence in men in terms of arousal. They select for competency. So Albert Einstein is a lot less sexually appealing than a roofer. Forget the fact he was a celebrity in his day, and focus on the argument. Raw intelligence is actually a huge turnoff for women, it's basically a form of vanity when not in use. If you're Elon Musk or Gates, sure. But 90% of the people that smart are just Joe F. CPA.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 12:29 AM
5

Is SMV5 male a sloppy bum?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 12:25 AM
1

🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 12:24 AM
1

🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 11:35 PM
1

Neurotic in this context is referring to an atypical response to typical behavior. e.g. thinking that blowjobs are degrading is an atypical response, to typical behavior. Men sticking stuff up their ass isn't typical behavior, for straight men. But TBF, if we were talking about gay men, not taking a dildo in the ass would be neurotic if they were otherwise a bottom or whatever they call that shit these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 11:15 PM
0

This is just braindead liberal talk, why even bother. You know they're not the same thing, why are we going to have such a stupid discussion?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 11:11 PM
0

(in nontechnical use) abnormally sensitive, obsessive, or anxious. Does this sound like a guy who won't get pegged, or people who don't do oral? Not like anyone expects honest answers out of wormy old wezel liberals.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 11:02 PM
0

Ok liberal
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 10:59 PM
1

In hindsight I think this might have been the secret of the chadiest chad I've ever known. Every girl he gave an identity, he knew.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 10:42 PM
1

I understand, but have you ever seen a post that touched on the point you made and got it right, addressing the female perspective. I've never seen any PUA content touch on making her feel special, in the way you've framed it. But you're 100.00% right, I see it, but haven't been able to codify it. It would be helpful to weaponize this obviously, I've used it inadvertently but would be interested in reading about this in depth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 10:37 PM
0

Women who think blowjobs and other banal sex acts are gross or degrading are neurotic was my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 10:34 PM
1

Nice try, but no. Men not willing to reciprocate oral sex are neurotic. As are women who have trouble sucking dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 10:34 PM
1

Just stating facts is all. Women have trouble with this, obviously. Let's them frame normal men as "sexually incompatible" when in fact said woman is neurotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 08:36 PM
1

Have you ever seen someone post something about this from the PUA community that got it right?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 08:02 PM
1

Why on earth would strangers have a say in what boundaries individuals can have in their relationships? I'm not, just saying those men and women are neurotic. (in nontechnical use) abnormally sensitive, obsessive, or anxious.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 07:58 PM
0

So you basically give carte blanche for the woman to set the rules and if that's not what reasonable men expect, it's "sexual incompatibility." Pretty wormy IMO. I think it's a stretch to consider giving blowjobs unreasonable in any way unless you're talking about some ultra religious type thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 07:31 PM
1

Interesting. So do you think you represent the view of most women? Do you think sex is a burden in a way? Is having a husband a burden?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 07:23 PM
0

Would you consider being unwilling to give blowjobs neurotic?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 07:21 PM
0

Right. I'm saying if we change your mindset to "eww, these things are all gross" you'd have a worse sex life. That's neuroticism. That's something said woman needs to fix, not enable through finding an enuech.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 07:16 PM
1

as the poster in question, this was not a statement of RPW but of the fact of normie mommy moo-cow mass of women marital desire. to lock down a man who will give them the white picket, princess wedding and children and lifestyle they want while also placing the least possible sexual demands on them after they get it all im sort of baffled how "least possible sexual demands" needs a definition. how can it be stated in plainer clearer language Doesn't seem to match this statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 07:05 PM
0

Well yeah, this is why I asked for BPW tags. Because I think it's sort of a convenient out for these women to just claim that it's ultimately "sexual compatibility." It's just the other side of the point being made. Which is that women generally select men that they aren't willing to meet the demands of, in order to get the lifestyle they want. Most of these women, if they were less neurotic would have better sex lives, IMO. But I am trying to understand the mindset more. It seems like women in …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 07:04 PM
2

The limiting factor on making a nuclear weapon are the raw materials. The government accounts for this stuff so stringently they're able to detect when natural nuclear reactors occur in nature. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 06:16 PM
2

Lmao I know right. I just refuse to stick to one ideology and it infuriates me that people are possessed by their beliefs. There’s just no point even talking to someone like that IMO. tehehe I'm so special and different, this isn't AF\BB it's like apes and birds tehehe
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 06:12 PM
1

So your view is straight up that women, eventually, maybe not initially, as a norm are sexually repulsed by their husbands? (after they've given them all the beta stuff and the rush of locking it down is over) Since you view women who have kids as being in "mommy mode," can you comment on women in this situation that don't have children?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 05:48 PM
1

u/atlas_b_shruggin Do you think this represents most wives and the way they think? Or is it more about porn-sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 05:44 PM
1

Ok. I’ll assume sexually demanding has to do with the recent porn sex threads. It didn't, but after posting this I started to feel like this is what she meant. Porn sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 03:53 PM
3

I appreciate the input. I asked for RPW\BPW because I did expect that BPW would sort of dismiss the premise as an attack on their attraction to their husband without being objective about it. I think you have an interesting angle, but it doesn't really hit what I'm curious about. It's great content, don't get me wrong. Poster is a high sex drive poster. She was commenting on women in general. So I think her commentary was on median sex drive women, jane.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 03:50 PM
1

It's feels before reals and tinges uber alles. Relatedly that women will fuck men they hate but won't for men *they feel nothing for.* TL;DR making her tingle is the most important thing, all else trails.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 03:42 PM
1

Yes and to expand on what that means.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 03:39 PM
1

Protip, look at Facebook events for parents night out services. $50 or so for 4\5 hours usually. Not sure if still googly eyed infant and all that, but once they're a toddler it can provide just enough time to realize all the stress is kid related, reconnect and reset.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 03:38 PM
-3

It's okay to say that you don't think this applies at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 03:35 PM
1

I was plenty “alpha” enough, but she wanted to be married to more of a provider and, at that time, I wasn’t that. That's a very polite way to frame her being neurotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 05:53 PM
1

it means I'll have betrayed the trust and broken the heart of someone I love. The problem here, is if you're caught. I mean it's still going to fuck up your relationship, but that's when the lies and bullshit starts.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 04:35 PM
0

> I don’t buy any of that MRP stuff. If she left you right now, how many times would it have to happen like this before you started to believe it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/20 12:11 AM
1

> comparable to cheating That's the question obviously. Why you think people have better control over themselves in relationships than eating and other impulse driven decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 11:45 PM
1

Couldn't start the thread I wanted 🤷🏻‍♂️ overly particular mods.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 11:12 PM
1

This isn't a thread about the views of cc riders. It's about behavioral expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 09:38 PM
1

Who would casual sex be any less compelling for an older person?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 08:24 PM
1

Yeah but you're using it to just malign the participant. It's not really commenting about their behavior changes at all. once a slut, always a slut. you will always be used goods. If you had added that you don't think she'll change her behavior, then your post would address the OP. But instead you're talking about something the analogy isn't even addressing. Which is something like "do you think people who eat cheeseburgers are bad?"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 08:15 PM
1

Very even keeled answer. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 07:52 PM
1

Is this your way of saying you're gay?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 07:51 PM
2

So you wouldn't mind if your husband occasionally had casual sex with other women as an occasional treat?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 07:49 PM
2

So how would the motivation change when older?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 07:48 PM
3

Why do we have the urge to eat?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 07:43 PM
3

How would your body know you're sterile?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 07:16 PM
7

“urge to reproduce” is cultural, not biological. You're just making a semantic argument. The urge to reproduce is the urge to have sex. Your body has no idea that birth control or abundance exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 06:52 PM
5

You're just making a semantic argument. The idea that we have arousal triggers built into our bodies along with the capability to produce and say it's not a purpose is ridiculous. That's like calling computing a "side effect" of "the arrangement of a CPU, memory, hard drive etc" of a computer. It couldn't be more obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 06:51 PM
1

I don't really see how this talks about the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 05:30 PM
1

I understand you don't view casual sex unfavorably, that's not really the point of the OP though. We're discussing a partner having casual sex (with someone else), when you've settled down with you. Much in the same way an alcoholic might start drinking again. I'm curious why you view former addicts and cheaters as having shown a pattern of behavior you find incompatible with a relationship and then not seeing that same pattern here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 05:29 PM
7

There is no imperative to reproduce. There is an urge to fuck. The consequence is reproduction. There is no will to live. Just an urge to eat and not do stuff that will get me killed. The consequence is I have to read ridiculous replies that can't admit a basic fact, like procreation is a human purpose and imperative.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 05:27 PM
1

So you think former drug use and cheating is baggage, but a history of casual sex is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 05:23 PM
1

Do you think it's a risk that you take as a partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 05:10 PM
1

So you wouldn't date a former addict?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 05:01 PM
1

So you date former cheaters, addicts etc? Have you found them to be fairly reliable?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 03:48 PM
1

I was asked to repost one of those. That made the 2nd one. What whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 09:00 AM
0

It’s reported that less than 20% of patients who receive treatment for alcoholism remain alcohol-free for an entire year. However, while the first years can be the hardest, the relapse rate does go down over time. Ruh roh The problem with ex-sluts isn't just that the risk of them cheating on you, but also all the other things - heightened risk of divorce, them perceiving you as a consolation prize etc. Good point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 08:39 AM
1

Do you have your own theory why these marriages tend to be less stable in studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 05:21 AM
1

I think they settle down just fine. Feel free to share your view in detail. This isn't a CMV, it's open.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:34 AM
0

Okay, just controlling for one variable at a time. Do you think women who engage in a lot of casual sex are likely to abstain from it when they "settle down?" Or do you think they'll revert to their previous lifestyles? Or do you think most women who make this change do so at their peril?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:26 AM
-1

"Of course I've been tested recently, I'm also snipped!" I've been blown away at how many women who aren't on birth control will let you blow it right in them when they can't even remember your name. TextNow > Settings > Account > New Number Tell them what they want to hear. They want a bad boy, fine. They want a church boy, sure. Get... it... in.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:19 AM
1

Great answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:16 AM
0

Do you believe that women who have lived the "fast life" stand a higher chance of reverting to that lifestyle after "settling down?"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:15 AM
1

Casual sex = junk food Do you trust that they give it up forever?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:14 AM
0

Do you have any view on the actual point of the bad analogy?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:14 AM
1

The point of the analogy is focusing on the proclivity of people to return to their preferred habits, whether or not they are healthy, the likelihood of that person maintain their new diet etc. Does a leopard change their spots etc. So you're on the "leopard not likely to change its spots" side?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:12 AM
1

So you're on the "would never eat another cheeseburger in her life" side?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:11 AM
1

15-25, you met at 27.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:11 AM
1

This is not a rationalization. I've had every single thread that had even an ounce of RP removed after posting. Hyper neutral leaning blue is the only thing they allow for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:10 AM
2

It's not the same but it's been brought up a couple times in here and it's a good point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:09 AM
2

Another poster brought this up and I think it's a valid and great related point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:09 AM
0

No, it was about an n-count argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:07 AM
0

So you think almost all of those women never snort another line again?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:07 AM
2

Good point
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 03:52 AM
1

Right, we’re not talking about n=5 Jane.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 03:51 AM
3

What does this have to do with the ncount argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 03:51 AM
1

If you can't offer a way the question can be posted, which it is a valid question, you don't have "hurdles." You have a wall. Own your wall and stop calling it a hurdle.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 08:03 PM
1

This isn't even remotely close to what was posted. Stop wasting everyone's lives with ridiculous posting requirements that impossible to get past and just ban discussion of it like incel stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 08:01 PM
1

Just ban it on here already then if everything is some violation of the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 07:56 PM
1

I haven't seen them and I'm on here all the time. Link?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 07:55 PM
1

> Do not ask questions that are better suited for TRP or TBP. PurplePillDebate is not for red pillers to talk to each other in front of blue pill or vice versa. So you want this to be Q4RP?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 07:54 PM
1

Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 07:53 PM
1

Why would liberals object to libertine culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 02:19 AM
1

Right, beta things.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 01:22 AM
1

Sans your building example this is all beta stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 01:20 AM
1

What is gender as a personality?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 01:17 AM
1

Exception proves the rule
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 01:16 AM
2

As in she is more sexually promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 01:03 AM
1

Is it better to pedestalize or see them as low value?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 01:01 AM
1

Sure it is. Just not a truth you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 01:00 AM
0

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 03:33 AM
2

Nothing women are aroused by.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 01:18 AM
1

Agree
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 11:28 PM
15

her sexual value plummets and she’s not really worth hooking up with anymore. No RELATIONSHIP value plummets. If anything, her SMV increases. She's signaling a low barrier to entry, no pun intended. That's why you call these women easy. Because having sex with them is easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 08:13 PM
2

Mostly yes. So they do share a beta view of women. It's part of the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 08:12 PM
3

These are great points, going to take a while to digest a response. I do know that beauty and the beast *is* tailored to a woman's mind. It's a great example.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 07:39 PM
9

Women earned 80.5% of what men earned in 2017, based on the annual median earnings for full-time, year-round workers. Women earned a median of $43,002 annually in 2017, and men earned $53,420. So looks like the average male is about $15k a year short from your 58% threshold. So assuming women bridge the gap and start median earning 53k, men will need to earn about $85k a year to please most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 07:35 PM
3

Right, she's the villain. As in "not all women are like that." Also, again, he's a rockstar. If you replaced the rockstar with just another more masculine guy, that movie would be gritty AF.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 07:32 PM
1

tl;dr women are trashy
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 07:30 PM
2

I mean this is my point. The audience doesn't feel sympathy for him because he framed himself as a dope unintentionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 06:56 PM
1

It is, but It's framing her as a villain, like I said. They exaggerated the hypergamous element with rockstar to make him the dope. And honestly, I've watched more ID than anyone. It's basically all insurance fraud, and TBH more men than women murdering their partners. But the men murdering their wives seems to be in response to a likely divorce to avoid the pending financial other issues that come with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 06:53 PM
2

I should have mentioned fiction, you're not wrong. It's harder to hide reality, cameras rolling. Basic impulses and desires are more evident.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 06:52 PM
12

This would be easier to agree with if this didn't match narratives women perpetrate to support this. e.g. With porn, women are unanimous. "This is not how sex is." But few if any women will ever tell you "I don't really care if men are good people, I'm more interested in if he's masculine or attractive." Largely because women don't even realize that's how they date men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 06:51 PM
6

"It is the fault of the girl for not recognizing that I am the hero and I deserve her". Agrees with OP, just from the other side of the coin. But on this side of the coin you're addressing that men feel entitled to women for being "heros." Yes, this is the male objection to hypergamy. That being a hero doesn't even really matter at all. If movies held a more common narrative that the more masculine man, not the better person gets her, women would claim they're being falsely portrayed, that they …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 06:48 PM
13

You gotta really understand the motivations of writing to get the example, but it's great really. It's a writer trying to use the plot mechanic, and failing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 06:42 PM
0

Any reality tv show will show you this. Forgetting Sarah Marshall shows this. "Forgetting her." Not this is how it is. I feel like reality TV misses the point of the OP. But you're not wrong. Look at the ID channel, it’s almost all “killing her husband to be with another man” I think you're talking about lifetime. ID is mostly insurance fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/20 06:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter