TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

usimariT Archive

View 1 post and 97 comments by usimariT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Not to defend TRP ideas (not red myself), but - independently of their content value: Hypergamy is just a description of what women do, it is not an explanation for why or how they do it. And for a good reason: TRP is meant to be a purely descriptive praxeology, as opposed to a hypothetical theory of what may or may not be the underlying background/origin of those observable traits. The thing is: as soon as you quit the safe terrain of purely descriptive praxeology (which is what matters for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 04:05 PM
1

Not to defend OP's idea (I personally think neither side should pay for the other except in an egalitarian alternating way and only once an LTR is reached… and both sides should wait for LTR, though not for marriage, before having sex), but your shop analogy doesn't correspond to the situation in the OP, especially concerning the apparent incompatibility that would lead to a stalemate: The enormous difference between your customers vs shop situation and the situation between men and women presen…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 09:29 AM
3

That quote was misattributed to Marie-Antoinette… Find more details about that in this comment
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 08:37 AM
1

About the former: While indeed the line definitely isn't from any Queen Elizabeth either, the consensus among historians is that Marie-Antoinette never said that line which is (oddly) commonly misattributed to her nowadays. The actual source of the quote is known to be "Les Confessions" by Rousseau, but in there it isn't attributed to Marie-Antoinette at all but to some unnamed princess (time and country unspecified) … and the only plausible candidate in France happens to be not Marie-Antoinette…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 08:28 AM
1

No need to go into ridiculous over-dramatization. For one thing, the fact that whores are a lousy partner choice for someone looking for a healthy relationship doesn't in any way imply that any non-virgin woman would be a "whore". Actually, "whore" isn't even the opposite of "virgin". The criterion that makes a whore is not a matter of virgin or not but the transactional behavior (i.e. using sex as a means to get to money). That problem would exist just the same in a "beginner" whore (even in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 12:00 AM
1

First of all: the "bad" in my last comment wasn't meant as a moral judgement - after all, any person (including whores) are free to do what they want with their life as long as they don't hurt others. It's their choice and business… and their responsibility (including the consequences of those choices). The minority subset of men who ask for whores (and who thus share that transactional mindset) are so-called johns or tricks. For THEM and their transactional intentions, whores are probably great…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 11:39 PM
1

…which is just a ridiculously minuscule and totally non-representative minority of men. In other words: The point you're actually making here (even if that wasn't your intention) is that delusion is enormously more common among women than among men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 12:00 AM
1

My impression is that degree to which old tradcon sexist gender inequalities are still a thing (even if just as a matter of hypocrisy or cherry-picking, such as those women who still want men to pay for dates while otherwise rejecting the old gender roles where it's not in their interest) is very largely dependent on the location as well: I get it that in the rural midwest USA such olde tradcon sexism (e.g. with regards to who pays for a date) is still a thing. Was much less the case from what I…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 07:58 AM
2

it doesn't lose any of its meaning, which is: a woman who offers sex and/or romantic companionship in exchange for money, the latter being what she's after. In what parallel universe is such a transactional / whore mindset not a bad thing (for someone who is looking for a healthy lasting relationship and not a john looking for such a transactional for-money exchange)?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 03:30 PM
1

Sure, but - as OP pointed out: the fact that men's preference (at least for relationships) aren't sluts… is in no way slut shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 02:07 AM
1

those are two large disjoint groups with only a minimal intersection on the venn diagram: on one side mostly those with a loose sociosexual orientation who want casual sex - on the other side mostly those with a restricted sociosexual orientation who care about lasting long-term relationships and therefore about n-count.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:14 PM
1

except if you are an islamist warrior who died waging jihad against unbelievers, then, apparently, you get 72 "houris", which are a very different type of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 02:46 PM
2

exactly this. As a dominant of the more gentle/caring type who is neither a sadist nor into degrading stuff, I'm always amazed at how lots of people weirdly confuse "dominant" with totally different things (e.g. pain, degrading) that have nothing to do with dominance itself and the only thing they have in common is that lots of very different things are loosely grouped under the "BDSM" umbrella term.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 06:52 AM
4

The term "liberal" seems to totally have lost any of its meaning in the USA, where is now frequently but absurdly employed as some synonym for "not conservative" or "diverging from Republican positions". Liberalism actually inherently means to hold freedom in the highest priority in politics and strive for maximal practically possible freedom. The diametrical opposite of liberalism is totalitarianism, such as Marxism on the left extreme and Fascism on the right extreme, which are both about the …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 09:24 PM
1

While I - a man - totally agree with you about better avoiding people who aren't compatible and disagree with his "if she's hot, I don't care" attitude, what I actually find really weird is this kind of generalizations onto a whole gender. Do you generalize the same way when a person of <insert any racial group outside your own> says something you find weird?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 09:49 AM
3

The correct thing to do when she believes in irrational crap like horoscope is not to lie … but to next her. In fact, irrationality/stupidity is a red flag to check for and weed out early on. But then again, that's from a perspective of restricted sociosexual orientation (i.e. evaluating as a partner for a long-term relationship). I suppose that people who just want casual sex / ONS have different criteria and possibly don't care about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 06:17 AM
1

There is no contradiction between such behavior being typical these days and them being slutty. The fact that it's become average/typical doesn't make them any less slutty. It's just that it's become statistically normal/typical these days for them to be slutty.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 03:29 AM
2

exactly. In fact, the only way that makes sense is to go dutch at the beginning and then, once there is an established relationship, switch to alternately footing the whole bill. Incidentally, that's the standard in Western Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:13 PM
0

It can be a good way to vet men who only wants sex and ghosts afterwards the opposite is the case. Those who want that have a far higher tendency to want to pay, precisely because their reasoning is "I'll pay… and expect sex in return, cause then she owes me"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 01:10 PM
3

Nothing shallow about that. It's just basic rational risk assessment. Just as it wouldn't make sense to call a car insurance "shallow" for assessing the accident risk based on the track record of past accidents.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 06:37 AM
2

Nothing shallow about that. It's just basic rational risk assessment. Just as it wouldn't make sense to call a car insurance "shallow" for assessing the accident risk based on the track record of past accidents.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 05:56 AM
4

Good thing that there's a lot of variance in tastes and not everyone likes the same, otherwise we'd all compete for the same small subset. Personally for me it's just the opposite: it's big breasts that are a turn-off. And extra bonus turn-off points in case of fake tits / implants. Also my impression is that there seems to be huge geographical differences in beauty standards in that regard: big tits and butts seem to be a thing in the USA, whereas in Europe, beauty standards for women are more …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 05:00 AM
0

Makes sense. Nothing shallow about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:52 AM
1

While I'd say that such a humoristically direct formulation would not be adviseable (that is: if you already decided to next her because Food Digger, you'd do humanity a disservice to point out to her that she needs to refine her Food Digger rhetorics, and if you still consider meeting her then such a direct formulation would not be favorable and you need to formulate your Food Digger test more subtly)… … there's nothing "toxic masculinity" about it. In fact the term "toxic masculinity" is a rat…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:36 AM
1

The situation does kinda scream: Alert, Alert: she's probably a Food Digger who just wants to use you for a free dinner. Which is one of the major red flags indicative of later "entitled princess syndrome" and narcissistic and sociopathic behavior. Not because of the "foodie" by itself (that can also mean other things and thus doesn't necessarily imply such a behavior), but because of what you wrote in answer to comments, about her rejecting your suggestion to go for a coffee and insisting on a …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:22 AM
1

Normally the man pays on the first date That's a US-centristic projection. In western Europe, including Germany where OP is located, that's not common at all, and certainly not "expected". The standard for who pays what here in western Europe, is to go dutch at the beginning until there is an established relationship and then switch to alternately footing the whole bill. In this case, everything points to her being a Food Digger.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 03:43 AM
2

yeah I also almost puked just from reading the couple examples on that first wiktionary page.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 07:42 PM
1

…in the USA yes, because Evangelical (in the US sense) denominations have a much bigger market share there and that tends to even push the others to somewhat follow that direction towards radical views and bigotry. In Western Europe, that's not the case. Christian churches have been pretty much tamed and potty-trained by the secular society. Most Christians are much more chill and the majority of them falls under the category that are Christians and believe in God but aren't very religious. Been…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 07:30 PM
3

Agree… Berliner dialect (e.g. "ick")… is just ick.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 07:20 PM
5

Makes sense. Nothing shallow about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 07:17 PM
5

while I agree about smoking being a mega-turnoff… I don't see what would be shallow about seeing it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 07:13 PM
1

That quote does not in any way support the claim you made in your last comment. In fact it doesn't even contain the word "marriage".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 04:00 PM
2

can't speak for the "Anglosphere" as a whole (esp. not Australia and NZ), but from what I've experienced myself and gathered from Friends in the UK and Ireland, the situation there regarding that question is apparently much closer to continental Western European standards than to what seems to still be the norm in the rural Midwest US. Anyways, I don't see how one can fault OP for ASKING given that precisely he doesn't know what it implies and which factors of the information he provided it may …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 03:45 PM
32

Definitely sounds like an FDSer to me yup, sounds like Food Digger Strategy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 03:15 PM
4

That's a US-centristic projection. In western Europe, that's not common at all, and certainly not "expected". The standard for who pays what here in western Europe, is to go dutch at the beginning until there is an established relationship and then switch to alternately footing the whole bill.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 03:07 PM
2

I'm 165 cubic centimeter. ahm… I take it you meant 165 centimeter (aka cm), not cubic centimeter. A cubic centimeter (aka cm³ aka milliliter aka ml) is a unit for volume, not length (height) as a centimeter is. 165 cubic centimeter is about half the volume of a standard can of cola (330 ml in the EU vs 12 fl oz ≈ 355 ml in the USA)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 02:57 AM
3

nope. Quite tall actually (between 6'2 and 6'3). Nothing to do with my height. OP's question was about what turns you off lookswise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 03:49 PM
4

long nails (just keep em short and natural, dammit) big butts, tits, or lips anything fake, e.g.: makeup (anything more than the very light "no makeup" look), fake nails, shaved/redrawn eyebrows, fillers and other plastic surgery, botox face tattoos and piercings unnaturally colored or peroxide blonde (bleached) hair the instagram/instahoe look the "thicc" look (a euphemism for "fat") high heels deep décolletés, overly revealing clothing (unless it's in private) or any other attention whoring lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 03:00 PM
3

the Laffer Curve isn't "made up" at all. It's just the reformulation/paraphrase, in form of a curve, of a very basic mathematical/economic principle: the tax collected by the state is tax rate times taxable amount (e.g. income). So when the tax rate approaches either 0% or 100%, the result necessarily approaches 0$ because one of the two factors in the multiplication approaches zero. Therefore the optimum for the state (in the sense of maximization of collected tax) is necessarily somewhere betw…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 03:43 PM
6

does anyone really? The argument I usually read about the relevance of height on reddit from guys who care much about the height thing (probably because they are on the smaller end) is not at all the idea that a couple extra inches would make a big difference on the upper end of the height spectrum, but that they do very much (to a disqualifying extent) on the lower side. In other words: their argument is that (everything else being equal) a 5'8 or smaller guy is very much out of luck compared t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 01:37 PM
–

I don't think it's healthy, but constant complaining and "victim" mentality can be a very effective strategy for some
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 09:08 AM
–

a distorted alternate "reality", that's what a fantasyland is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 08:07 AM
–

so… radfem fantasyland
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 02:44 AM
–

there are lots of creeps among both men and women. Fantasyland would be to ignore that reality and try to put it as if all creeps were on the other side only, be it only women (dunno if that's what MRA believe … if so, your "MRA fantasyland" would apply to them) or only men, as radfem fantasyland inhabitants believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 01:57 AM
–

In what parallel world do you live? There's loads of creeps that are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 01:33 AM
–

you mean, as in: as long as their number is low, people would care to keep it low… and then once it reaches some critical point, people wouldn't give a shit any more? Kinda reminds me of a German proverb which roughly translates to "once the reputation is ruined, one can live without care/inhibitions" or, to keep it rhyming, "once you've got the name, you might as well have the game"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 09:29 PM
–

Certainly not stop fucking. But one could imagine that it might have a statistical impact on the propensity of people to change partners quickly or to engage in ONS / casual sex because people might have more of an incentive to have a more restricted sociosexual behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 09:14 PM
–

Do you think that it would, for those that don't already have a high number, have a statistical influence on their propensity/willingness/probability to engage in casual sex vs being more careful to keep their "number" low?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 08:12 PM
–

never mind "judging". It's not about "judging" or morals at all, but about the basic principles of risk assessment. It's the exact same reason why a car insurance wants to know about your accident history: A consistent repetitive track record is the most strongly indicative factor of the probability for the same thing to happen again. Same goes in matters of sexual/relationship partners (as studies show). Let's say your potential partner has consistently changed partners quickly (say, on average…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 08:01 PM
–

thinks my n count is a lot higher than it is for some reason maybe that's a projection indicative of how she chose to come up with the number she told you. The saying (tongue-in-cheek, but probably with some degree of core truth) is that men tend to multiply their actual number by three while women tend to divide their actual number by three
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 07:47 PM
–

but let's say you see that your potential partner has a track record of consistently changing partners often (i.e. relatively quickly). Don't you think that that would be a major factor for evaluation? i mean, not if you're just looking for casual sex of course, but for someone whose goal isn't casual sex but to be to build a long-lasting relationship, wouldn't you think that would be a very relevant factor in order to avoid being the next one to be quickly discarded?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 07:22 PM
2

since most women don’t care if their high-value man was a player I don't have any studies data that would allow me to assess in how far that is the case, but don't you think that women who want a lasting long-term relationship would actually care about whether a potential partner has a track record of changing partners often?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 12:59 PM
4

studies clearly show the number of previous partners to indeed be one of the strongest factors linked to the probability of cheating. But even independently of cheating: if you know that a potential partner has a track record of changing partners often, that's not what you look for if you want a lasting relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 12:41 PM
2

As a men this is just stupit Uhm… what is? The comment before yours argues in favor of taking both tests (the one described in OP if it were to exist… just as well as a paternity test in case of a childbirth) and merely criticizes the hypocrisy of those who would want one but oppose the other, so I don't see what you disagree with
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 08:09 AM
4

happy double standards then, I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 05:56 PM
1

Hmm lemme guess: two different cover versions of "Pastime Paradise", the better one being titled "Amish Paradise" and then a boring one… hmm… I forgot its title.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 09:08 AM
4

straight people could not handle the realness that is LGBTQ+ dating how so? what is it about it that straight people couldn't handle?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 10:12 PM
1

lol. Nice sarcasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 09:20 PM
2

it's just a placeholder name for a bitter delusional hag with a confrontational and misandrist mindset (incidentally exactly the type of populace that collects in the FDS gutter)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 09:11 PM
2

It only seems more plausible if you already buy into the premise of the OP. nah, the plausibility assessment is totally independent of the premise of OP. It just makes absolutely no sense to ascribe such behavior to devotion. Sure, but still a whole lot more than the reverse. When the fraction is so ridiculously small that there are so many post-dot zeroes before the first non-zero number, the relevant thing isn't what digit comes afterwards but that it's both in the same ballpark and both are s…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 03:24 PM
1

seems more plausible that this what's keeping them isn't devotion but masochistic kink or motivations totally orthogonal to that (e.g. status, money, lifestyle etc). As for the "many (…) kill them": lol. It's such a microscopically minuscule fraction of couples that the argument would just as well hold for men staying with women who kill them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 03:14 PM
2

and what about 1/10? reserved for TrigglyPuffs, gutter kweens / FoodDiggingStrategy and other bitter dumpster hags?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 12:06 AM
3

it's quite obvious that OP means to draw a parallel to the rather common case where the reverse situation happens, that is: where the woman stops sex at some point after marriage, thus effectively leading to a dead bedroom marriage situation
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 01:05 PM
1

100% societal and systemic (including prevalence in media) Anyone who has had enough contact to and observation of a sufficient sample pool of both genders while growing up knows early on that there is no reality-based ground for any projection of a "wonderful" halo on either side.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 05:54 AM
3

About the latter: Like the saying goes: if you were a socialist at age 20, it shows you have a heart. If you're still a socialist at age 40, it shows you have no brain. That being said, it would make no sense to try to transpose that into an excuse for a slut past.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 06:17 AM
1

The point was: Those lines weren't expressing merely "aiming high" (i.e. doing so once for selecting one husband) but hypergamous change/variability esp: aiming for higher and higher partners until she's ready to achieve some apex partner (archetyped as billionaire Elon Musk… a choice which incidentally was also very telling about a financial motive).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 03:33 AM
5

the point was: It's absurd to frame the differences in the arousal ignition threshold of men and women as if one side was being more "genuine" (sic). It has absolutely nothing to do with more or less "genuine" but instead simply with one side having a close-to-zero ignition threshold (i.e. being always ready) while the other has a comparatively high ignition threshold (i.e. needing work to ignite). A higher ignition threshold isn't any less "genuine". It is just as genuine in both cases, it's ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 12:14 AM
11

apart from the fact that even "reactionary" doesn't mean settling in my book, she didn't write "reactionary" but "reactive". And what she obviously meant was that unlike the typical male libido, her female libido isn't always in an active state from the get go but instead only starts up in reaction to her man bringing her into the mood.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 07:50 AM
17

Nah that's actually the way arousal works for many women (even among highly sexual women). That is: it takes more to ignite it but once properly ignited it's the bomb.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 03:56 AM
4

a fiancé (aka fiance if your keyboard/system doesn't support accents) is a man who is engaged to be married. The female equivalent, i.e. a woman who is engaged to be married, is a fiancée (aka fiancee if if your keyboard/system doesn't support accents). Small difference (just one more letter) in writing, big difference in meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 03:46 AM
7

That's an absurd attempt of inversion though. The idea that a sex strike could in any way be a response to a previously fucked-up relationship makes no sense. In fact, there is no situation where a sex strike would make any sense in a relationship. A sex strike is the kind of fucked-up shit that fucks up a relationship. If (to play along with that absurd hypothesis) the relationship had been fucked up to begin with (that is, even before her fucking it up with that sex strike), then the only move…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 03:19 AM
1

No, I wouldn't continue sleeping with a woman if the emotional connection was damaged beyond repair. That being said, It's obviously not for the same reasons as you, given that in my case it's a matter of restricted sociosexual orientation i.e. unlike you I also need that "deep emotional connection" initially and couldn't just throw that requirement out of the window initially on account of "attractiveness". In fact - no offense - The concept of INITIALLY starting with a loose sociosexual approa…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 02:58 AM
10

The bar for each of these things changes a little bit based on where I am in life. If (low situation), I probably wouldn't be ready to demand Elon Musk If anyone was looking for a perfect example of an admission of hypergamy, look no further.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 02:26 AM
4

or men who want a relationship but not marriage ?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 04:10 PM
3

FDS is dating advice for women either you've never read their shit or you are trolling. FDS is not dating advice (not even close) but hard coping circlejerk for lowest-of-low class dumpster trash
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 03:28 PM
1

Thicc is just a lower-class American euphemism for FAT.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 10:11 AM
4

You seriously want to #metoo Superman. That already kinda happened… well, at least the actor playing Superman, Henry Cavill… and not for anything sexual either but merely for having expressed his concern about the increased risk of false rape accusations. See here. He was excoriated for that by the #metoo movement and had to publicly apologize in order to not be cancelled. Brave new world, eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 03:07 AM
1

they're in her freezer in her basement. As are the last 3 guys she banged.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 08:31 PM
2

who said anything about taking app-sloots seriously? Of course no high-value man will consider any form of serious relationship with an app-sloot, but there are enough who will casually pump them… which misleads the app-sloots into believing their value is in the same category as that of the men who pump them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 07:18 PM
1

I happen to value those things. But a threesome with the state is actually detrimental to those goals
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 04:31 PM
4

1- my husband one minus your husband?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 11:50 PM
2

to help you find out which of these it is: here's the taylor series for sin(x)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 11:46 PM
0

Engineers use SI units, not deprecated inconsistent imperial units like "feet".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 11:28 PM
5

The one on the right looks like TrigglyPuff
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:32 PM
3

again: First wave feminism was about gender equality. Third wave feminism is far away from being about gender equality (which is egalitarianism, not feminism).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:03 PM
1

Doesn't have to be Swiss either. While the Emmentaler type of cheese is indeed of Swiss origin (as the name shows: Emmental is a valley in the Bern canton), it has been made in other European countries for more than 150 years. These days, I'd say French Emmental (from Savoie) and German Emmentaler (from the Allgäu) both surpass Swiss Emmentaler by quite a margin. The other thing is: depending on where you live, what is sold to you as Emmentaler or "Swiss Cheese" doesn't even come close to actual…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 05:40 PM
1

Emmentaler
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 05:24 PM
4

Nah, "wanting gender equality" isn't feminism but egalitarianism. The idea that Feminism would mean "wanting gender equality"(sic) would have made sense 50 years ago… or let's be generous: up to about 40 years ago (about mid 2nd wave feminism), when feminism was still aligned with egalitarianism. Feminism has long parted from egalitarianism since, to the point of being incompatible with egalitarianism (in some domains even opposed to it).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 05:18 PM
–

In Islam, the man can divorce simply by saying "I divorce you" three times… AND he keeps his assets AND the woman does not have that possibility but can only divorce her husband under far more restrictions (which require him to have committed some very serious fault and her to bring forward irrefutable evidence or at least four witnesses). Much as the divorce laws and court system in Western countries are biased to the disadvantage of men… in islamic countries it is biased to the disadvantage of…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 04:49 PM
1

women have the state-granted power to UNILATERALLY decide if that pregnancy leads to birth or not and even if they do choose the former, they can still unilaterally decide to give the child into adoption… unlike men who, in the case of an unwanted pregnancy, are fucked if the woman decides unilaterally against him to give birth to the child. And most women on ppd (and most other reddits, whenever the subject of "legal parental surrender" or "financial abortion" comes up) seem to explicitly want …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/21 07:30 PM
1

In all fairness: Given that the whole argument was terrible to begin with, adding guns can't nuke it any further. At this point, it's almost some form of honest admission and recognition that her argument is all nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/21 05:59 AM
1

Indeed it's a view of western feminism. Can't speak for how it is in Russia or China. Apparently, going by the explanation she added, feminism in Russia is very different from what it is in western countries. I'll take her word for it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 07:17 PM
1

I'm into egalitarianism and feminism I'm all for egalitarianism, but: That phrase of yours would have made sense 50 years ago… or let's be generous: up to about 40 years ago (about mid 2nd wave feminism), when feminism was still aligned with egalitarianism. Feminism has long parted from egalitarianism since, to the point of being incompatible with egalitarianism (in some domains even opposed to it). Nowadays you'll have to pick either, can't have both. Oh and just to avoid any misunderstanding: …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 05:12 PM
1

if it's casual sex you're after, then that's precisely the case where the question is rather irrelevant to begin with… as opposed to LTR, where the n-count does matter. Which is precisely why LTR-oriented people (those with a restricted sociosexual orientation) care much more about n-count than promiscuous people (with a more loose sociosexual orientation).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 03:03 PM
1

people with a restricted sociosexual orientation and/or low n-count are a minority (and hard to find) in both genders. As for the other thing: Doesn't make any sense. It's actually close to the opposite, that is: those with a restricted sociosexual orientation who want a low n-count are precisely NOT those who fall for "the lure of sex", whereas those who get tricked by someone using the "lure of sex" are precisely those with a loose sociosexual orientation who can be baited with that. And the w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 11:51 AM
3

10 people in 10 years = one "relationship" per year on average, not really what one would call long-term relationships. Serializing 10 short-lived relationships like that ten times in a row looks like a massive red flag indicative of an incapacity to keep a long-term relationship running or even a failure to vet with that goal in mind. As for having sex at the BEGINNING of a relationship, that's a strategy that translates not caring about keeping the n-count low. Apart from the fact that the rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 06:43 PM
2

requiring “low n” sounds like a recipe for a future dead bedroom (because people that like sex usually have sex, not wait until they are married) That's the wrong projection of people with a loose sociosexual orientation, who erroneously equate that with "liking sex". The reality is that people with a restricted sociosexual orientation like sex just as much if not more… they just don't care for CASUAL sex (i.e. outside a LTR). N count isn't a question of "liking sex" but of sociosexual orientati…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 04:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter