TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

v573v Archive

View 0 posts and 2,808 comments by v573v on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,808 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You just finance it with your body for 18+ years at the threat of prison in some cases.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 11:12 PM
1

Where did I suggest to defund anything? You asked for examples of society needing to train men to adopt behaviours that are against their own nature, specifically violence, and I provided it. The nature of men isn’t violent - you need to program men to suppress their nonviolent nature in order for them to become soldiers.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 11:08 PM
1

Zing! You are a master debater for going directly to the final strategy for winning a losing argument, which is name-calling, brilliantly played! I’ve learned so much from your position on the subject and you’ve completely changed my point of view with your cunning insights. You must be very proud of yourself right now for the argument that you’ve made on this subject. Please show your parents this brilliant retort so that they can share in your glory and feel justified for all the education tha…
/r/MensRights18/10/21 10:58 PM
0

Is that the best argument you can formulate against my point?
/r/MensRights18/10/21 10:45 PM
1

It’s satire and it’s also very true. A woman’s age is reduced when it comes to her male sexual partner and I’ll give you another illustration to prove the point - a 30 year old male who has sex with an 18 year old female is often perceived as a pervert despite our society considering 18 above the age of consent so, you see that once again her age is again reduced like reverse dog years.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 10:44 PM
7

It’s sexual objectification of men by women that has women project the creepiness of objectification itself onto the victim while boosting their own esteem. Imagine being such a sexually attractive woman that some poor random dude can’t be trusted around you!
/r/MensRights17/10/21 10:24 PM
2

It’s called the military - it’s an easy web search. Canada, a nation not known for it’s bloated military budget, spends 21 billion annually, that too, is an easy web search. The concept of professional soldiers has been around for thousands of years, off the top of my head, Spartans would be an early example of a standing army of professional soldiers who occupied their time training for war and it was accepted by the people of their time that one spartan was worth seven from any other city stat…
/r/MensRights13/10/21 08:40 PM
0

sexist and insulting to both boys and girls, Hurting people is so far outside the scope of humanity that companies and nations spend billions annually to teach men to be violent. I fail to see how acknowledging women’s humanity is sexist and insulting enough that they should be included as victims in the above scenario, especially, since the above scenario removes all humanity from the males. I’m glad that she spoke up to end it but I’d certainly feel uncomfortable complaining that it’s racist t…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 09:09 PM
-56

I think you’ll find that when it comes to sexual intercourse human males are often multiple times the age of human females, kinda like dog years…. It would seem that she’s actually 15 in human sexual intercourse years.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 01:21 PM
31

It’s much more sinister than that: Boys are being used to prevent girls from fashion bullying each other. When a girl introduces her sexuality into her clothing choices she’s instigating other females into a sexuality arms race that will eventually lead to bullying as the limits of what girls are willing to wear is met individually. The Supreme Court ruled that anything goes so long as it doesn’t distract other students from learning. The argument that it ‘distracts boys’ is easier to use agains…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 06:37 PM
3

I’ve rarely seen a woman ask a man out on a date much less muster their own sexuality so much that they’ll take those kinds of sexual liberties. I’m sure there are cherries to be picked, but ultimately, women tend to work through agents when dealing with a love interest than tackle the task themselves. In my many many years on the planet, I’ve been specifically asked out twice, but many more times have I had a friend of a woman approach me to let me know that their friend ‘likes’ me and that I s…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 12:18 PM
20

Mostly because there’s a disconnect between the people who want to end domestic violence and those that want to build a sustainable charity on top of it. The ones that want to build charities on top of it spend money to make women look as much like a damsel in distress as they can so that they can collect more money from chivalrous people.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 11:55 AM
15

The tens of thousands of people were executed between the 17th and 18th century because: A) they were given an unfair trial? B) they proven to be witches? The answer is both and when you understand this you’ll understand why our current justice system is structured the way it is.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 11:42 AM
34

Conversely they often choose the most downtrodden of women to prove that women as a class are the victims of a system of gendered oppression.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 01:03 PM
2

Everybody’s value, male or female, is determined by their capacity to meet the needs of the people who have the closest social bonds to them and then outwards towards those who have looser social bonds.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 09:34 PM
2

Since we are all wearing masks I’ve taken the opportunity to experiment with my facial hair and have learned how to trim myself a glorious beard which seemed to beg for me to grow my hair long - so I have, and I too have never been happier with it.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 07:32 PM
3

Gender roles are typically a gender’s best foot forward when partnering for the benefit of creating the optimum conditions for raising healthy children into adulthood. Note that ‘best foot forward’ doesn’t mean only foot forward, a man can become the primary caregiver and a women the primary provider or even fulfill both roles but it’s usually with a greater effort and with lesser outcomes.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 12:36 PM
65

Typically, men bond over activities and women bond over conversations, so under the current system of sitting in a boring room chatting isn’t going to build that vital connection with the therapist.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 11:57 AM
1

boy’s life ruined As if the assault wasn’t bad enough we must also cripple him with this devastating forecast.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 11:45 AM
5

as masculine as possible Typically, aren’t men are just normally masculine without making the effort? not show emotions Why is it not enough for men to feel emotions but they must also exhibit their emotions? not do anything remotely feminine If most men are inherently masculine then they won’t be inclined to want to do things remotely feminine will they? The problem you are having has it’s roots in the idea that gender is a social construct; it follows that if gender is a social construct, then…
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:33 PM
2

My brother in law was like you until his ex found a husband and then he became a second income to her new family. Keep the receipts and a log of the time you spend with your kid because it might come up and bite you in the ass whether the mom wants it to or not.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 10:30 PM
5

If they want funding they have to make it about damsels in distress women.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 09:16 PM
1

You don’t think that feminism being the ONLY SOURCE public servants rely on to understand gender issues puts them in the way of men’s issues being addressed especially in areas where men’s issues and women’s issues are in conflict? Such as shared parenting, divorce reform, parental consent? Hell, read the side panel here that highlights the leading men’s issues and ask yourself whether or not gender equality solutions take a privilege away from women…. You’ll get a fairly clear picture why femal…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 11:08 PM
3

As a father to a son and husband to a wife with autism the diagnosis is helpful to explain certain behaviours and more importantly give me an insight to make a measured response to them. It’s also helpful for planning activities that they will both enjoy rather than dragging them through what they would individually or together consider absolute hell.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 10:35 AM
4

Unless the person defines their identity with being the victim of white, male, and/or straight and then it’s all about me.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:18 PM
9

They like to hide their dirty deeds after they commit them so that they can have a continuous flow of useful idiots conflating feminism with women or feminism with gender equality. A few years ago the NOW opposed a shared parenting bill in, I believe it was New York, with an open letter but it’s been expunged from everywhere except various men’s rights sites where they have no power or influence.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 08:11 PM
3

You were, if you are male, we all were and are, male and female, even the people, both male and female, who designed that course and lecture to young boys about women being property, even they, perceive women as the property of men. The problem is in how they identify property as a possession with ownership implied - ownership is a misnomer, in fact, men are positioned by everybody over women not by ownership of women but by stewardship, and in our stewardship, we are obliged to manage and care …
/r/MensRights06/08/21 10:15 PM
47

So… this isn’t a story about the bad self-destructive toxic masculinity that we are told to be afraid of, it’s the good self-destructive non-toxic masculinity that saves other people from injury?
/r/MensRights05/08/21 10:04 PM
27

If men took a year long vacation, the privileged women would immediately coerce other women into adopting the vacant roles, and then, most blue collar men would voluntarily cancel their vacations to spare the women closest to them from it.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 09:46 PM
1

The argument that child support can or should be viewed as debt in the event of a divorce is worth considering.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 11:18 PM
3

As long as we’re pretending that women were the only ones both affected by or limited to a list of things… Women of Britain still aren’t allowed to vote to elect their monarch!
/r/MensRights23/07/21 10:38 PM
0

This thinking is as ass backwards as the thinking that puts all of the vehicle carbon under my foot because my wife doesn’t drive despite the fact that I’m driving her somewhere for her sake. When my wife buys underpants for me and my kids she shouldn’t carry all that carbon as the household spender anymore than I should for being the household driver. I’d love for these fools to realize that often men and women live together as partners so their behaviours aren’t exclusive to themselves.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 02:54 PM
9

It’s much simpler than even that and she actually hits the nail on the head in the article with this line: “ Ferrazzani found that the project of taking a small business national conflicted with being a parent.” Simply put, women don’t have a desire to partner with a primary caregiver - they desire to be the primary caregiver. Even when their fortunes have changed enough for them to pursue the primary provider role they refuse it in favour of caregiver.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 10:27 PM
1

Masculine traits and feminine traits are historically noted gender differences not so much historical wishful thinking and if you examine masculine traits which are typically inherent to most males you’ll see why they are easier to raise than females. Girls have a tendency to appeal to authority whereas boys tend to exercise their own authority. Girls typically want to immediately collaborate with others on solving their problems whereas boys desire to solve their own problems before seeking hel…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 10:42 PM
0

When he turns 14 let him decide for himself.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 07:28 PM
5

It’s more like men and women historically working together with their best feet forward to create the optimal conditions to raise the healthiest children given their individual circumstances. Men and women are both are co-conspirators and willing collaborators in almost every gender issue when each issue is put in it’s historical context.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:46 PM
0

You honestly want us to believe that you ask for consent EVERY TIME you touch your sexual partner in any sexual manner whether it’s part of the same sexual encounter or not? Bullshit! You’re either lying or you’ve never had sex, because, for anybody who’s actually had sex would know - it’s a total wet blanket that is more likely going to turn your sex partner completely off than that lead to anything else. Let’s try something else…. Let’s examine whether or not her behaviour was reasonable given…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 10:21 PM
-1

‘just touch him…’ that’s a funny concept! You are diminishing the sexual assault - which is a series crime! Why don’t you feel that a prolonged sexual assault isn’t as serious as a brief penetration? I suppose that’s a crime that you are guilty of but feel no need to report it to the police despite the fact that if I was to do it to you it would be a different matter entirely? Hypocrite!
/r/MensRights27/06/21 11:27 AM
2

Fatherhood is a role so “my body/my choice’ must apply to it.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 11:18 AM
0

Do you honestly get prior verbal consent every time you playfully touch your girlfriend or boyfriend? My wife slapping my butt when I’m bent over doing something must be considered sexual battery? Putting my hands on her body while kissing her makes me a dangerous offender? She had a prior sexual relationship with him within that very hour, they were both still naked from the sex, and she stopped as soon as she was fully aware that he wasn’t into it, yes, he was technically raped but I wouldn’t …
/r/MensRights27/06/21 12:23 AM
4

Giving a man the power to decide whether or not he is going to be a father takes that power away from women. Shared parenting removes the family court bias in favour of women. Divorce reform removes bias in favour of women. Men’s rights is perceived as a hateful group because correcting the imbalance between women and men takes away current powers and privileges of women.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 11:20 PM
7

That’s like my mom blaming my dad for working himself into an early grave to provide for her and her kids. Women’s desire for comfort and security historically influenced and continually influences men’s exercise of power even at the cost of men’s own comfort and security. To pretend that this exchange hasn’t existed for several millennia into ‘the current year’ is either outrageous cruelty towards men, or more likely, just more generosity towards women.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 06:21 PM
2

Reproduction is the principal drive of all living organisms, and for a male human, observing masculinity is the easiest path to achieving the capacity to reproduce and the preeminent traits that are useful to carry offspring into healthy adulthood. Human female sexual selection favours males who present themselves with inherent masculine traits because those traits partner well with her inherent feminine traits. For each feminine or masculine trait there are both benefits and liabilities which a…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 02:33 PM
5

The problem with masculinity is that it has been entirely separated from the pinnacle male achievement that is husbandry and fatherhood so the positive traits that make a successful husband and father are often misconstrued into either something harmful or downright sinister. ‘Is it wrong to steal a loaf of bread?’ becomes the preferred ethical question, instead of, ‘is it wrong to steal a loaf of bread to feed your family?’
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:58 AM
1

He paid off her mortgage (they bought a house together) and financially maintained her and her children after she quit her job. I don’t like it either, but acknowledging those two positions means recognizing that, under the current law, it’s a common law marriage.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:27 AM
2

It’s called casual flirting and it’s a normal human behaviour that is often appreciated if done by the right person, so, I guess a lowly cashier isn’t the right person for her. Being asked to smile by another person is a triviality easily overlooked so I’m inclined to think that her complaint is more ‘how dare those filthy peons consider me sexually!’ than the other option.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 02:01 PM
1

A problem that plagues men’s rights and masculinity to be sure because his disguise is a ridiculous character of cartoonish masculinity not found outside of a young teenager’s perception of manhood.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:28 PM
1

I’m a man who believes that the family unit creates the greatest potential and easiest path for a man to achieve self-actualization and what you’re proposing will not resolve male problems but will definitely delay any resolutions. The problem’s facing men need to come to a head and not be deferred by childish absurdities. I recognize that it’s entirely unrealistic for heterosexual humans to ignore their biological instinct to pair bond and produce offspring and that the only people who can achi…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:24 PM
-2

I think men rights needs to sit down and have a serious conversation about closeted homosexuals rationalizing their homosexual instincts into bizarre philosophies about women. My utterly homophobic neighbour doesn’t want to lose half his house to a woman but in the ten years that I’ve lived near him he’s never once had a woman over…. just a series of young men who’d come over a few times a week and then completely disappear after a few months. He has all sort of philosophies about women being th…
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:46 PM
24

It says a lot about society that a woman believes that by justifying her abuse as a “lesson” everything will turn out alright for her.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 08:52 PM
3

Erik Denton, the father of the children — two girls and a boy — sought custody of them on March 1, according to Tulare County family court documents online.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 11:43 PM
2

Without cataloging these events we will get more comments like this which was tweeted by Michael Moore: No women ever invented an atomic bomb, built a smoke stack, initiated a Holocaust, melted the polar ice caps or organized a school shooting. His statement above was throughly debunked on all points because the woman who corrected him knew women had been involved in all of these historical moments for the worse.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 11:39 PM
1

8,890,357 students with 10,000 self reported instances means 0.11% of students faced the harassment listed but they are using that as the basis to define a toxic system that is ‘rife’ with problems? With 99.89% of people in the system not being a problem (assuming that the 10,000 instances were not serial offenders) it should be an indication that the system is rife with well behaved non-toxic boys and men and not the other way around.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 08:38 PM
4

Male or female, the person who aspires to adopt the provider role should pay for the dates. If she’s acknowledging that her best foot forward is not the provider role then there is no gender equality conflict with her desire for men to prove their ability to provide for her and their future children together, if however, she wants him to be the primary provider and primary caregiver, or share the caregiver role equally between them, then she’s a hypocrite. Edit: never mind, I made this comment b…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 08:03 PM
38

Do you know why the trucks and gas chambers were utilized? The answer is found in testimony by a high ranking nazi during the Nuremberg trials. According to him, despite all of their propaganda, they were having all sorts of difficulties with their death squad members having to shoot women and children. Those nazi beasts seemed to make a distinction between the killing a Jewish man and killing Jewish women and children.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:29 PM
96

Shaped by men for the benefit of their mothers, wives, and children.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:08 PM
1

The situation resulted in us putting hands on one another but she eventually left. it just so happens that I had went on a date and slept with a girl that I actually really, really liked that same night, but hours before the fact. I’m not this kind of guy, but, if I was, I don’t think I’d tell my wife that I’m this sort of guy, and, if I did, I’d realize that she doesn’t seem to believe the story of my ex more than the story I told her...
/r/MensRights27/03/21 10:21 PM
3

It’s all about promoting gender as a class and how the differences compare historically or worldwide than any one individual’s lived experience - that way, they can access their great-grandmother’s, or possibly even their great great great grandmother’s (these days) lack of career opportunities or an African woman’s genital mutilation in another country unrelated to theirs, both of which, they’ve never personally experienced, but they can still access it because they’re also female. Meanwhile, I…
/r/MensRights25/03/21 10:13 PM
3

Who identifies the man as shitty? A women pointing a finger at him and making a declaration of shittyness? What evidence do you have on hand that makes any sexual interaction between a you and a woman consensual? Here is where you have to accept that your proposed solution is utterly unsuitable for preventing sexual indiscretions or giving a victim justice. There are solutions that have been shown to prevent these sexual indiscretions but they involve educating people about how alcohol has the a…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 10:33 PM
12

Using fear to violate the human rights of a group of people for the behaviours of individuals within that group is maintaining and promoting a system of discrimination that is always seen in hindsight as historical acts of evil. Do these idiots honestly believe that the historical discrimination anyone faced in human history is due to a collective of agreed upon evil more than fear driven decision making by a terrified population? Any political leader willing to allow their own or other people’s…
/r/MensRights15/03/21 09:34 PM
5

Women and men seem to understand that as a couple somebody is going to be the primary provider while somebody is going to be the primary caregiver. It’s very rare for the stars to align and give both partners and equal shot as equal providers. So, somebody is going to assume the role of either primary provider or sole provider and secondary caregiver because you can’t usually make money and provide care to dependants so you need a life long partner to help fill in the role you can’t... this is n…
/r/MensRights02/03/21 11:14 PM
8

I doubt they’re this crafty - they seem to just brain fart this stuff and people go along with it because they’re the authority on gender related issues and nobody wants to be a misogynist for disagreeing.
/r/MensRights02/03/21 10:48 PM
1

Early in my relationship with my wife she used to do this but I pushed back with three strategies that were effective enough that it doesn’t happen at all anymore. The first strategy that I used for trivial shit like the beef was to run every shady choice I could make past our adorable son and get him to help me come to my decision, so, if she had a problem with my choices, I’d defer all questions to my chubby faced representative. The second strategy for more serious complaints was to repeat th…
/r/MensRights01/03/21 11:08 PM
152

This was an interesting finding. Previous studies have sought to explain male violence towards women as rising from patriarchal values, which motivate men to seek to control women's behavior, using violence if necessary,” Bates said. This suggests IPV may not be motivated by patriarchal values, and should be further studied with other forms of aggression. As usual, without the convenience of blaming a person with a penis, they’re off to discover the real reasons why humans misbehave.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 10:20 PM
4

She asked her grandmothers what they wanted to be when they were younger but didn’t bother to ask if, despite their lack of career, they feel that they lived a fulfilling life. Furthermore, if she were to ask her grandfathers what they wanted to be when they were younger, do you honestly think they fulfilled their life’s ambitions? Or did they spend their lives toiling away on something that was far less life-fulfilling than their wives did? Nobody on their deathbed has ever said ‘I wish I spent…
/r/MensRights24/02/21 12:24 AM
1

When she finally builds a family of her very own this attitude of hers will serve it well because she will extend it over them.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 11:34 PM
27

So the fact that women would have to pay child support for children who live with the fathers and wouldn’t have to with adoption isn’t the primary motivation behind this system? It’s those greedy adoption agencies! Grrrr!
/r/MensRights22/02/21 11:04 PM
7

This can be used as a teachable moment. Above we can see that a demographic of people are being singled out and denied human rights because of this person’s fear of them based on a small minority of bad actors within that demographic. The vast majority of men are entirely innocent of the charges brought forward but because this person isn’t capable of perceiving a men as anything other than fear objects, men must lose their most basic of human rights. Remember this when you’re considering the so…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 11:22 PM
1

One is moderated by feminists and the other is not so the ideas presented in the feminist moderated sub needs to support the political philosophy and movement that exalts women above men and respects feminist social regimentation or your ideas will be suppressed.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 10:08 PM
7

I get harassed by the police all the time while walking down the street... have you ever been harassed by the police when walking down the street? Ever have some punk throw fireworks at you? Ever have a car full of drunken jerks get out of their car to fight you? Ever have a car slowly drive up on you, the occupants shout stuff like ‘hey fagot’ at you and drive away? These are privileges?
/r/MensRights17/02/21 11:54 PM
5

“O brave new world, that has such people in it!”
/r/MensRights16/02/21 01:27 PM
1

Being tall indicates a degree of higher nutrition over several generations which signifies a pattern of family wealth since balanced nutrition isn’t cheap and family health by illustrating a pattern of healthy family lifestyle choices. As a studying doctor I’m sure you’ll agree with me that nutrition is crucial for growth and development and the best odds at producing healthy babies and a healthy future for those babies. In fact, men’s sexual desire for a young and healthy mate isn’t the shallow…
/r/MensRights15/02/21 11:58 PM
1

A 5’5 vascular surgeon scored himself a shorter woman who earns less than him? That’s so revolutionary in terms of sexual selection that we need to study his methods so that all men can catch themselves a lady who’s shorter than them and earns less money... I suppose the so-called shorter man was also taller than his lady friend? How much more do you think he earns compared to her? I think you’ve inadvertently discovered the drivers to the problem even though you might not want to acknowledge it…
/r/MensRights14/02/21 11:19 PM
3

The cousin came outside to see if he was okay and that shows a level of concern that could probably be turned into compliance if the vet actually wanted it. I’m betting after the vet yelled about the game initially their was no follow up conversation to explain his PTSD problem. Unless the person you’re talking to has an understanding of your mental condition you’re going to have to explain it to them if you’re going to spend any amount of time with them and not have issues... You gain better co…
/r/MensRights04/02/21 11:49 PM
1

In the event of a divorce how prepared are you to give half custody of your beloved children to an ex? How prepared are you to not see your most precious baby on their birthday or at Christmas or on Mother’s Day? How prepared are you to see a bruise on your child’s leg, as all children get bruises from time to time, and not think a crime has been committed? How prepared are you to see your child spending half it’s time with your ex’s new wife? How prepared are you to be locked out of a significa…
/r/MensRights04/02/21 11:11 PM
2

Do you really think that you’d be able to resist the mental conditioning that comes with modern military training? That’s adorable!
/r/MensRights29/01/21 11:11 PM
4

The Military Service Act of 1917 was a controversial law allowing the conscription of Canadian men for service in the final years of the First World War. Although politically explosive, the Act had questionable military value: only 24,132 conscripted men made it to the battlefields of the Western Front, compared to the more than 400,000 who volunteered throughout the war. That’s 6% not 99.9%. Men are actually willing to put their lives in danger to keep others from danger and ignoring their inst…
/r/MensRights27/01/21 11:23 PM
1

Judge not, lest ye be judged by your browser history.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 10:26 PM
5

Traditionally women’s access to power was in their ability to influence the behavior of others which is a form of power not acknowledged by gender studies classes.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 10:19 PM
-1

So, we’re policing thought crimes now? They’re fantasies... by definition they shouldn’t be used to indicate anything about a person except the depth of their imaginations.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 04:20 PM
3

When women are deemed unfuckable we’re invisible to society and treated like animals men. This person is oblivious to the fact that any person who lacks feminine sexual attractiveness in society all have the same value in that society.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 01:18 AM
3

It’s both since feminism is in the way of gender equality.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 12:51 PM
1

Propaganda doesn’t typically answer to a free press or answer any follow up questions. Having complete access to both Twitter and international press conferences but preferring Twitter to communicate is a good sign that a person is full of shit.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 11:49 PM
13

The vast majority of men in areas where feminism is the single authority on gender equality agree with women’s rights including the totality of MRAs and we’ve never personally known a time when women couldn’t vote or work outside of the home so guilt can’t be the main driver although it’s probably a minor influence. The main driver is chivalry and aside from gender equality feminists have also gone out of their way to make feminism synonymous with women themselves so any attack on feminism is pe…
/r/MensRights11/01/21 11:06 PM
4

This phenomenon of demanding behaviours from others without exhibiting the behaviours yourself was tried with tolerance and gave a spotlight to Jordan Peterson, who, is only known today because he exposed the horrible intolerance of the same people who were demanding tolerance from others. They’re trying it with respect without considering that only when the behaviour is given will it be returned. Intimidating? Loud? Sweary? These are not the behaviours of a person who respects others.
/r/MensRights06/01/21 10:10 PM
2

How the hell is a human being confronted with a controversy and not have any instinct to investigate it. As soon as I saw the title, my instinct, like many of yours I’m sure, was to ask - what does amen actually refer to? This story must be a hoax! It’s impossible for a group of humans to behave so damn disappointingly against basic human nature. Oh, wait... they’re politicians? Oh, never mind.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 03:56 PM
9

Modern feminism? The founding members of the 1960s feminist movement fought against shared parenting in the event of a divorce when the men’s liberation movement (it was formed to coincide with women’s liberation) presented that as their number one gender issue in the late 1960s early 1970s. The national organization for women, the preeminent women’s right organization, has always opposed and still opposes shared parenting. So, there was only a roughly nine year span in which feminism was about …
/r/MensRights02/01/21 11:15 PM
1

Do you hate being helped even when you don’t want it? Do you hate not being helped even though you need it?
/r/MensRights01/01/21 10:21 PM
2

Well, I’m a happily married man with two children, but my middle aged neighbour has embraced this philosophy so I’ll give you some pro tips that I’ve observed from him: Try to work ‘not having children’ into every conversation and repeat it multiple times within the same conversation so that it becomes uncomfortable to the listener. Leave your front door wide open, but keep the screen door closed, even when it’s below freezing by double digits so that you can hear ‘life’ around you. Whenever you…
/r/MensRights30/12/20 05:34 PM
2

In the United States of America... they, for some reason that baffles the rest of the world, insist on using the imperial system and make a massive distinction between marriage and common law marriage, so, although, marriages are down I think you’ll discover that humans cohabiting and having offspring together is rising to make the difference. It’s such a sticking point in the USA that only seven states acknowledge common law as a thing while 2 states allow it on a limited basis and, the rest, e…
/r/MensRights30/12/20 04:10 PM
1

I lived through the Cold War and the western policies towards the USSR were unnecessarily aggressive and caused more militarism and war posturing than anything the soviets would of done alone. We didn’t avert a Cold War because of the west’s world leaders we had a Cold War because of them.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 10:14 PM
2

I have specific jobs at home that are my exclusive responsibility. If these jobs aren’t done by me... they aren’t done at all; so, in terms of external compensation, I’m as entirely qualified for it as she is. It’s very romantic of you to think that my wife cooks and cleans for ME and MY kids but those terms do in fact make her my employee... how about you accept that it’s also her house and they’re also her kids... Or maybe you acknowledge that in the beginning there was a working man who lived…
/r/MensRights24/12/20 08:18 PM
9

In a world designed to create exclusive privileges of the male as a class don’t you think somebody else would be the ones to do this kind of dangerous work and shitty work - I dunno... maybe girls? Ya know - those historically oppressed class of humans we’re constantly being told were treated worse than anyone?
/r/MensRights22/12/20 11:49 PM
1

So, according to the crown, being female is a mental illness that prevents a person from understanding that they are committing crimes? But women are still the equals of men, right? Right...? They can say it all they want but their actions and behaviour says different.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 11:44 PM
2

She is paid by me in the same manner that I’m paid by her - she is compensated for the work that she does at home in the same way that I’m compensated for the work that I do at home. If my wife is considered my employee because I exchange my earned money for any of the work she does at home then, under those terms, I’m obviously her unpaid intern for everything I do at home and should also be compensated.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 10:28 PM
14

My wife is a stay at home mom and the company I work for does not pay me on her behalf - they pay me for the work I do for them while the work that I do at home as a husband and father is payed in the same manner as my wife is payed for her work as a wife and mother. If you pay women for their portion of at home labour you must also pay men for their portion of at home labour.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 10:32 PM
1

Wow, these folks discovered a new personality construct that’s existed within the population of almost every organized religion since the dawn of civilization! Double wow, I just looked out my window and discovered a new continent that I’m going to call America.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:09 PM
1

The short answer is that she probably had a feminine instinct to seek protection and he had a masculine instinct to provide it. It worth noting that I don’t support the concepts of toxic masculinity nor gender being a social construct so I can respect the man for his behaviour and honour it.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 10:49 PM
8

Traditional gender norms reinforce the idea that men are the breadwinners while women are the homemakers, and girls are often expected to take on housework. This type of sentiment is the entire problem - they’d rather pretend that women are helpless idiots and victims of an absurd conspiracy than acknowledge that women might actually have preferences that don’t coincide with some bureaucrat’s political agenda. Let’s all just pretend that the average working person’s lifestyle after retirement is…
/r/MensRights27/11/20 11:16 PM
-1

An anti-white movement? I didn’t realize that I’m on the police payroll, so, do I pick up my cheques at the local police station, is it an income tax deduction, or what? The police are an institution not a race of people. Institutions have specific rules of conduct that govern their behaviour and when a member of the institution disobeys the rules of conduct they should be held to account and if the members of the institution conspire together to shelter the members who disobey the rules of cond…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 01:20 AM
3

It’s not even that! She seems to have a problem with any objectivity directed towards her and prefers the old days when boys just took up their swords and shields in mi’lady’s service. She prefers the days when boys thought of girls as a damsels in distress, not equals, and certainly not an authority to be questioned. Gender equality hits her right between the eyes and her instinct is to damsel!
/r/MensRights14/11/20 04:52 PM
2

‘Girls are eager to become boring sooner than boys’ is what is meant by girls mature faster.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 04:20 PM
2

I’m sure the idea that men are ‘secret criminals’ leading a double life apart from their partners is more preferable than the truth for you.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:41 PM
1

The traditional patriarchy theory was at least more accurate than the bastardized version spouted above although the misstep still exists in both versions - that wealthy men work for the direct benefit of other men and not, in fact, their own wives and children.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:31 PM
3

I’ll try to remember how much better my wife is than me the next time she has me kill whatever insect she finds in the house. Perhaps that comparison is entirely unfair because it’s so far removed from the behaviour of violent criminal, but my wife really is a very good person, after all, she wouldn’t hurt a fly! The point I’m making is that women tend to act through agents who are typically men when it comes to injuring somebody or being injured themselves. I can remember an article posted here…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 06:54 PM
26

Bullshit, the theory claims that the male head of a family has dominion over the women in the family. Patriarchy is derived from patriarch - the father of a family. What you are defining is called an oligarchy.
/r/MensRights06/11/20 12:55 PM
5

Unless all women share the same brain - it’s unnecessary research. People are far too diverse, even within the same family (never mind something as vast as gender), to find any worth in the study of human demographics, unless of course, you’re participating in divisive politics.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 11:17 PM
1

There’s a theory that says the human instinct to fight or flight in a crisis is a male one (only males were studied) and females have a tendency to tend and befriend... if that theory is correct it would explain many notable differences in behaviour between men and women including why women are prone to emote more than men and why men often seek solitude (retreat) with personal problems and women seek friendships.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 11:59 PM
1

It depends on several factors the most obvious being - how serious is the problem to be solved and whether or not the man is empowered to solve it, so, If it’s a trivial problem - men will try to resolve it themselves, but the more serious the problem the more likely men are to involve somebody else. Second, does the man have a competent friend to assist them in solving the problem? Third, women are often soothed by a good cry but that is not any sort of salve for a man with a problem - he will …
/r/MensRights28/10/20 11:35 PM
7

A more accurate statement would be: As men, we are supposed to remain in control of ourselves to meet the needs of others, despite our own emotional state. This behaviour, to be useful in a crisis, is inherent to masculinity and directly benefits the people who don’t exhibit this standard masculine behaviour - women and their children. It’s deemed toxic by idiots who believe gender is a social construct because women can’t easily replicate this masculine behaviour - men’s behaviour has to be wro…
/r/MensRights27/10/20 09:59 PM
1

I suspect it has more to do with historical life expectancy between the men and women.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 12:53 PM
6

I suspect that there’s a balance of power and responsibility between the genders that isn’t being examined because the observers want to push the matriarchy narrative just as our balances of power are too often ignored to push a patriarchy narrative. There’s always a balance of power and responsibility in functionality that’s ignored by observers so that they can push a political narrative.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 12:35 PM
1

Although it’s unusual for young people today, the term race isn’t just limited to the major divisions of mankind, it is also used in reference to many other identifications of man, with nationality being one of them. Can you imagine how absurd giving prominence to the colour of a person’s skin in relation to knowing something about them would be if the things about them also identified their racial identity? Their racial identity would suddenly become as diverse as they themselves are!
/r/MensRights03/10/20 10:41 PM
-33

I look down on him as an incompetent and although I disagree with the woman that the toilet is for women only I acknowledge that she was at least using it correctly and he wasn’t. Those toilets are best used by parent’s with opposite sexed children of a certain age. Courtesy dictates that after he fed his baby and changed her he should of went potty in the men’s toilet and leave those parent’s toilets for dads with daughters or moms with sons, after all, a baby doesn’t have the ability to facili…
/r/MensRights28/09/20 11:01 AM
1

I exercised significantly as a teenager and I still had a problem, in fact, I had a problem up until I took a little white pill and then many problems went away.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 11:25 AM
1

I have ADHD but my mother and sister have anxiety and depression - guess which one of us has the right diagnosis? Tread carefully with this subject because I’ve yet to meet a person who was diagnosed with ADHD late in life who isn’t an massive medication enthusiast. A coworker of mine went to a special school to teach him how to cope with ADHD before ADHD was a thing and was held back two years because of it - a simple pill would of changed the trajectory of his life if they were available to hi…
/r/MensRights17/09/20 11:20 AM
2

It’s either the person was looking for MRAs being hypocrites since MRAs typically rally against the idea that ‘men need to be taught <insert basic human decency here>’ pushed forward by man hating arseholes with a political axe to grind or upvotes from subreddit manosphere refuges who just want to promote the idea that women are bad in the same manner that the above mentioned man hating arseholes want men to look bad.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 04:58 PM
3

I had a serious medical issue a few years back that had me, through no fault of my own, go on long term disability Insurance - it was a percentage of my wages but tax free so I actually made the same amount of money as I did when I was working - so I remained the sole family provider despite my being disabled. Since I was going to be at home all the time I asked my wife if she wanted to get a job - she refused (Lol) and remained the family caregiver, so, our selected roles didn’t change at all -…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 10:10 PM
0

It’s not a business deal but it is a partnership between two adults who divide demanding roles between each other because very few people’s life/work balance is balanced enough to optimally raise children alone - we need a partner to assume the role of caregiver or provider or some combination of both with each partner being primary of one and secondary of the other. All this illustrates is women’s own desires and personal choices to be the primary caregiver to her family but rather being celebr…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 09:16 PM
3

You don’t think much of ‘women/feminism‘ if you think that ‘tone’ makes all the difference. If only I changed my tone when speaking about human rights because they’d gleefully give up their stranglehold on the family court and stop blocking alimony reform! Gee they’re dumb! /s Why do I get the impression that you believe that if you only you say the right things then you’ll trick women into liking you?
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:12 PM
14

‘Women/feminism’ those pesky feminists really do go out of their way to make those two very different things synonyms don’t they? The nerve of lazy careerists... sorry, I mean feminists! Yeah, yeah, feminists... using women as shields to defend an absurd dogma mostly written by bygone lesbian separatists who reworked the playbook of Carl Marx to suit their personal agenda$. But, yours is the REAL feminism, right? Not theirs. Even though they’re the ones holding all of the power as feminists, wri…
/r/MensRights29/08/20 10:23 PM
3

I think you’ll find that the modern idea of toxic masculinity is any male behaviour that serves no benefit to women or that masculine women are unable to mimic without stepping well outside of their comfort zone.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 10:12 PM
10

I’m a pile of hard bone and tough muscles whereas my wife isn’t - guess which one of us two the kids want to hug when they are hurt and which one they attach themselves to when they are scared? I can sub in a pinch as a shoulder to cry on and so can she as a momma bear but that’s not our children’s ideal world. I seem to also have an inherent instinct and the physicality to match my children’s preferences as the provider and protector more than my wife does so that seems to be my best foot forwa…
/r/MensRights14/08/20 10:52 PM
0

Fact: most companies base their employee wages on not on how much those employees earn for the company but on industry standards - they call it ‘competitive wages’. I don’t agree with it but that’s the truth.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 08:38 AM
3

That’s cute but I’m sure she’d of conditioned you sufficiently so that you’d not realize that leaving her was an option.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 10:42 PM
1

I think you’ll find that promoting men’s equality often means reducing women’s privileges.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 10:22 PM
2

It would seem that their official position isn’t that women are children, it’s just that - they aren’t men.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 09:18 PM
9

Spoken by an oblivious idiot who doesn’t realize that they’re saying that horseshit in front of actual victims of genital mutilation - it’s not a theoretical discussion for men - we’ve actually have been mutilated! That dumb ass would find it very difficult to find a female victim of genital mutilation in the west but all they’d need to do is toss a handful of rocks into a crowd of men and they’ll hit multiple men who’ve been mutilated.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 10:46 PM
5

Her symptoms of fragile masculinity are actually symptoms of her fragile femininity. She has anxiety from men’s tendency to employ logic and reason to settle arguments over emotions. This is bad for her because, as a woman, she exercises an enormous amount of influence over men by employing her emotions when logic and reason aren’t useful to her. She loses the ability to damsel and it scares her too much. The other symptoms are fluff to legitimize the article because they actually are male anxie…
/r/MensRights26/07/20 05:45 PM
5

Certain gender studies groups need men to cry as readily as women because to them gender is a social construct and under those terms either men are wrong for not crying as readily as women or women are wrong for crying more readily than men, also, to them, women can’t ever be wrong! So, instead of acknowledging that gender isn’t a social construct they slander men as dysfunctional women.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 10:42 PM
-7

Sorry that we’re not lamenting the loss of our foreskins to your liking but we are the victims so we should probably go with how our instincts guide us and not by your impressions about how we should behave... ThIs is trend of policing a victim’s behaviour needs to stop right now.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 10:08 PM
1

‘Obviously I need to go back to work’ Not so obvious to the folks around here...
/r/MensRights05/07/20 01:10 PM
1

Most people take on partners to divide their labour. Before my wife, I was my both my own caregiver and my own provider, but by taking on a partner, I was able to reduce my overall labour at a cost that I was already paying; and my wife in return, was also able to reduce her labour at a cost that she was already paying. Together our overall work has been reduced but at a cost that we were already paying - profit! With each additional member of the operation the caregiver adopts more work while t…
/r/MensRights05/07/20 01:06 PM
1

Two years ago this sub frowned on the teaching of chivalry to young men due to it’s glaring sexism against boys and girls... Or perhaps you folks aren’t aware of what they are actually teaching those ‘gentlemen’?
/r/MensRights05/07/20 12:21 PM
12

Why do people think that it’s such a great idea to force children to grow up around a person who doesn’t want anything to do with them?
/r/MensRights25/06/20 10:01 PM
1

One relates to sexual attraction while the other relates to an utterly impractical and completely ridiculous battle dress uniform. They are not exactly related so it’s an utterly impractical and completely ridiculous comparison.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 03:56 PM
0

How about health and fitness? An attractive appearance as determined by men it is synonymous with a woman’s health and her living a healthy lifestyle. Men want to partner with the healthiest woman they can attract because a healthy lifestyle will benefit him and his children with her when she adopts the role of primary caregiver and leaves the primary provider role to him. Of course, I’m not sure of the context of that post, so if she means respecting women in terms of their value as an accounta…
/r/MensRights24/06/20 03:48 PM
2

Of course he’s Asian! that’s not a white man - they typically have light hair and skin that’s a dark haired but light skinned person with interesting hair..? hmmm... Chinese! so it’s a more of a swipe at the connection between Chinese people and COVID-19 (remember the American political push to call it the wuhan virus?) but the fucker is covering their ass by making the victim also ethnic. This is the type of shit being played nowadays by xenophobic assholes - they bait with racism but give them…
/r/MensRights21/06/20 02:52 PM
3

I would imagine that you signed some sort of tenant agreement when you took the place and from a casual look at aus eviction rules: Reasonable notice is usually at least ten or fourteen days. The notice must be in writing, specifying what the breach is. The notice must also state what must be done to rectify the breach and at what time. The notice must be signed by the landlord. Once the landlord takes possession of the premises, a notice to quit addressed to the tenant should be attached to the…
/r/MensRights21/06/20 02:32 PM
1

That’s a fresh and new approach to gender, dare I say ‘radical’ and not anything like what we’ve done for the past thousands of years... Imagine what our world would look like if women were valued for beauty and breeding and men for their ability? Gosh! I can’t even picture the world that she describes it’s so alien to our history! It’s a brave new world over at pink pilled feminism! /s
/r/MensRights21/06/20 02:07 PM
1

Um, I believe that’s the company’s share value and not the money that they earned from sales... Also, women are the primary family shoppers by a long shot so any provable loss is earnings for that period would be attributed to turning women off more than turning men off of their brand.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 01:43 PM
4

Use teeth rather than feet. The foot complications your listed are humorous but there is actually a strong case, in terms of both statistics and future medical complications, for removing people’s teeth before mutilating a penis.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 01:27 PM
9

A dad with a daughter and ‘her’ being the daughter. I could definitely see a new mom buying this on behalf of her daughter for the dad to wear while he spends father’s day with his daughter. Cha-Ching! The only other markets for it would be a financial loss for the company since ‘woke’ people typically exploit the concept of brand loyalty rather than obey it. Although, I will admit that I have seen company’s do stupid things sometimes. I personally disagree with it since I believe that Father’s …
/r/MensRights21/06/20 01:12 PM
1

My dad’s dead so piss on the rest of you and your relationship with your kids and their relationship with you.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 02:25 PM
2

My relationship involves an agreed upon exchange of goods and services Between my wife and I and I definitely pay enough to cover my wife’s portion of outstanding taxes. I think you’ll find that by examining ‘household income‘ you’ll clear up all statistical gender gap advantages and disadvantages and that should be the our only measure of financial well being.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 02:09 PM
2

So after twenty years of lifting heavy things, the old man jobs I was told to look forward to as a kid are going to go to young women who can’t lift heavy things at all?
/r/MensRights18/06/20 01:59 PM
1

How about we separate those who wanted kids from those who just wanted sex and stop pretending that they are the same?
/r/MensRights18/06/20 01:15 PM
4

The reason is very simple - it’s an illustration that you have the capacity and willingness to pay for her and your future children together. As a male you have to prove your ability to provide enough material wealth and physical security that she will feel that you will be a good partner. You might not like it but the ancient rules of courtship are still in play despite the lip service we are often told about gender equality. I’ve never seen a poll yet that highlighted women’s willingness to da…
/r/MensRights17/06/20 10:49 PM
2

‘Men/white people‘ I read that to mean all men and all white people. Apparently white men are double bad people so you should probably feel bad if you put any value in what a stupid racist and sexist imbecile thinks. See that’s the distinction that should be made - it’s not about black and white or male or female - it’s about whose the racist or sexist imbecile and putting them in the corner where they belong.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 09:52 PM
2

Men kill themselves because the entirely of their emotional connections are placed into their spouse and children which leaves them horribly vulnerable to emotional isolation when there’s a separation. I relish fatherhood myself and my kids are everything to me and I am highly aware of that if my wife should choose to leave and be an asshole about it... I’ll be in a very vulnerable place emotionally without any connections to the ones that keep me going. While we are being distracted by masculin…
/r/MensRights18/05/20 10:00 PM
1

Wait... If she earns more than you - why the fuck are you only doing half the shit around the house? She’s obviously the primary provider which makes you the primary caregiver - get your arse in the kitchen and make her a damned sandwich.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 09:35 PM
3

America? Marriage? Hmmmm.... They are funny about that down there... Lemme see... Ah-ha! As of 2020, only eight states still allow common law marriages to be formed in them. So, as marriages decline there’s an odd increase in Americans taking on roommates?
/r/MensRights30/04/20 09:52 PM
2

My wife and I are over forty and between the two of us, only she has seen women take advantage of their newly earned right to bare their chest in public, and that was on the very first day that the law was struck down - no, it wasn’t a celebratory feminist ‘free the nipple event‘- it was strippers advertising the club that they worked at.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 09:00 PM
4

From the article: according to a preliminary report posted on MedRxix, which hosts unpublished medical research papers that have not been peer reviewed. Then... it’s gibberish?
/r/MensRights20/04/20 10:19 PM
3

That’s also why men cheat but because they are men they have no one to blame but themselves whereas women are permitted to blame men.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 09:53 PM
-1

Force men to endure a thing so that women can be spared from having to choose one of their unlimited and unilateral choices. Decisions! Decisions! Men need to endure all sorts of nonsense to spare women from their own decisions! /s
/r/MensRights17/04/20 08:48 AM
1

There’s a fantasy involved but if the reality of the abuse was detailed I suspect those people would quickly change their minds about it.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 11:00 PM
4

They are counties that Chinese nationals don’t want to visit on vacation, don’t have family to visit, or don’t do much trade with China. When women are in charge xenophobia is double plus good!
/r/MensRights15/04/20 09:57 PM
1

Yep, that‘s the problem and not that, unsurprisingly, too many women don’t want to lose the ‘nice’ things about being a woman to the point that lip service about gender equality is more preferable to actual equality. Wasn’t there a study that showed that when a men treated women with gender equality the women perceived him as a misogynist?
/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:57 AM
2

Women watch porn. According to the site: 1/4 of American visitors to that site are female. A little over 1/3 of Brazil and the Philippines traffic is female. 37% of Pornhub’s viewers of gay-male porn are women. Women are 27% more likely to watch pregnancy porn. Women are 46% more likely than men to search for “big dick” videos Women spend, on average, 1:14 minutes longer than men per visit on the site. In both North and South America, the most-popular category among women is “lesbian.”
/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:00 AM
1

They follow behind nice moms and cool moms when discussing the various types of mom varieties.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 05:04 AM
3

It’s due to their fear of men and instead of their fear being mocked and criticized like most people today who fear a human demographic they are supported and often facilitated.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 07:42 AM
4

Imagine being a person who stresses themselves into a frenzy over something that other people usually don’t - that person doesn’t need their emotional stress validated - they need help coping with their emotional stress and not in the form of an extra pair of hands assisting them because no number of helping hands is going to help them out of their own mind stress, in fact, each additional hand will just become one more thing for these suffering people to stress over. Emotional labour is suppose…
/r/MensRights30/03/20 08:41 PM
65

Wait a minute.. You’re telling me that by making women look like damsels in distress you can raise funds, increase public interest, pass soulless legislation, and basically move mountains? And here I’ve been told that our society is hostile to women... wait a second! By making it look like society is hostile towards women... they are also making women look like further damsels in distress! It’s no wonder our vast collective of institutional powers work tirelessly to make women seem like timid in…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 09:16 PM
1

As a dad I can take a cheap shot like that, and as a husband I know my wife can’t, and that sentiment should call for a more merciful hand when talking about dads, but it doesn’t because moms are women and, as women, they are suckers for flattery.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 12:58 PM
2

I can’t think of many men I know who aren’t still working. In fact, the only man I can think of who isn’t working volunteered to stay home at a reduced wage and he still makes more than most doctors.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 03:02 AM
2

When you told him to stop crying did he stop? I’m guessing it took him a moment and that’s because crying is not a controllable thing and what you actually did was remind him to remain functional despite his crying.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 02:42 AM
5

She’d have to consider men in order to take stock of how they are at risk of contracting it. I’d argue that people movers like taxi drivers and transit staff (both dominated by men) are at the very highest risk because they are in both in constant contact with and in close proximity to random strangers and often without the PPE that nurses and emergency workers are issued and trained to wear.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 02:20 AM
1

Despite technological advances, hand-to-hand combat remains a persistent aspect of the contemporary operating environment (Wojadkowski, 2007). To develop a more detailed understanding on the use of hand-to-hand combat, the researcher analyzed 30 Post-Combat Surveys administered to US Army Soldiers from 2004 to 2008 after their return from deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. 216 out of 1,226 Soldiers (19.0%) reported using hand-to-hand combat skills in at least one encounter. The Soldiers’ descr…
/r/MensRights26/03/20 01:37 AM
4

Misogyny these days is any behaviour that fails to respect benevolent sexism’s hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 09:43 AM
12

As the family shopper for more than a decade, I can tell you that in my area, family shopping has suddenly become a very masculine role. Men work in the supply chain and in necessary services more often than women so men are leaving their houses more often and for longer hours. If giving a choice between getting sick themselves or their wives getting sick men will choose to protect their wives. Living with women and shackled with a desire to protect and keep them safe in a society that demands t…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 09:25 AM
3

So they’ll either remove the harsh penalties for not registering or make it voluntary for females?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 09:06 AM
1

In a criminal trial the accuser needs to prove their accusation beyond the shadow of doubt and rape accusations typically have the accuser saying the sex wasn’t consensual and the accused saying it was consensual and the evidence usually supports both so there’s a shadow of doubt. The court of public opinion and civil courts have no shadow of doubt threshold so the accuser often gains more support with those. The end result means that although the accuser is found not guilty in a criminal trial …
/r/MensRights24/03/20 11:23 AM
2

An addendum to your point: For each deviation from a standard masculine trait they list in the article they either don’t give a comparable study or they jump to possibly erroneous conclusions to meet the study’s data. Also, note that their idea of achievement is related entirely to job compensation and leadership roles which doesn’t necessarily indicate a man being penalized any more than it does a man comfortable with where he is, after all, not every man in a company is trying to dominate the …
/r/MensRights21/03/20 09:50 PM
1

Men didn’t formulate a series of traits on society’s insistence they are typically masculine in their nature and it’s as cruel to chastise a man for naturally meeting the observed standards as it is for chastising the outliers for failing to meet those standards. Having said that, occasionally masculinity is taken to an immature extreme which is typically and ironically found among males raised in the absence of men but those males are also outliers and also don’t meet society’s observed standar…
/r/MensRights21/03/20 09:19 PM
5

he hides his tears because he’s not supposed to cry. She didn’t list one fucking hardship that would induce most men to cry. Did a doctor tell him that his new born baby might possibly need surgery? Did he have to tell his sister that their mother was very sick and likely to die that day? Did he watch his father die? Yeah, he might cry at those events, I sure as hell did, but he and I aren’t probably going to cry because it’s cold out and there’s garbage to be put to the curb, which apparently, …
/r/MensRights19/03/20 09:23 PM
2

Great job at getting those things for women and in an amazing amount of time too!
/r/MensRights18/03/20 09:03 PM
1

Typically a woman acting within the boundaries of her inherent inclination to tend and befriend is also her best path to self actualization, but here we are being told that it’s a bad thing?
/r/MensRights17/03/20 10:19 PM
0

That’s awful! Women should be allowed to vote too and their rights as equal citizens should be protected under the law!
/r/MensRights17/03/20 09:48 PM
8

I’m guessing it’s because they didn’t get an invitation to flaunt family wealth at Mrs. Highsocieties afternoon tea party? She’s not illuminating male privilege but in fact complaining of a old female privilege lost with the advance of modern progress. Once upon a time it was a man’s duty to as a father or husband to finance a society women’s wardrobe to illustrate her status as a social somebody.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 09:41 PM
8

How about nobody tells men to protect themselves because they’d been doing that since they were kids. Girls typically prefer to play around the safety of authorities while boys prefer to play unsupervised so girls typically live a sheltered life while boys of the same age have already gained a massive amount of accumulative knowledge on playing away from authorities and so much so that they’re probably more sensitive to a bad street situation than their own adult mothers.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 01:08 PM
0

Pressure is one part coercion as you say but it’s also persuasion which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. To convince somebody to do something by using reasoning and argument doesn’t define a negative situation and that’s the problem with using a word like pressure when they mean coercion.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 10:34 AM
-2

What do you mean by pressured into sex acts that you don’t want to do? Define pressure... is it take the first no that comes along and never bring it up again because that seems to be the perspective of absurdly inflexible people who don’t understand human nature, how negotiations work, or monogamy and love. As adults I think we’ve all had sex with our monogamous partners because, although we didn’t really want sex, we recognize our partners needs as being important.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:09 PM
1

The 12 women who are murdered in Quebec yearly isn’t a sexy enough statistic to belong on a Women’s victimhood sign? How shitty do the women of Quebec have it that they feel the need to import their gender oppression from other countries?
/r/MensRights09/03/20 10:14 PM
1

You mean those greasy teenagers of the 60s and 70s who grew up so much that they had no choice but to modify their perspectives on the validity of lesbian separatism only to be challenged by an entirely new group of punk kids who know the validity of the teachings of lesbian separatism?
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:43 PM
-6

The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence. To hear your list of bonuses and perks from being a woman - I’ve been doing the women in my life a massive disservice by drastically underperforming when it comes to treating them like women! The funny thing is that none of them are complaining about my massive underperformance and I cannot stress how much of an underperformance it’s been! My underperformance by your estimate has been so piss poor and complete that I’m downright shocked…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:32 PM
1

And their political agenda and theories are all informed by past separatist lesbian thinkers who had no interest in living with heterosexual men and women. The apple of feminism isn’t suddenly rotten with third wave feminism it was rotten from the very beginning with second wave feminism. The above post that started this conversation was probably written by a kid who has never had a serious relationship with a woman and is strongly influenced by the heterosexual male separatist movement know tod…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 02:00 PM
7

Of course they could because humans are resilient so it’s a question of preferences not ability. Women prefer to be treated like women and that’s something that weighs against the establishments political agenda more than anything else which the establishment refuses to take into consideration when they formulate policy. Sexism is at work but it’s not an evil malevolence working against women’s interests but rather a helpful benevolence working at women’s insistence. If the patriarchy is real it…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 01:33 PM
0

My guess is that you’ve never heard of the ‘feminist lesbian movement’ and it’s influence on feminism? No? If you had you’d understand what I wrote and why I wrote it but, as it is, you’re just looking more and more stupid to those of us who have an understanding of the history of feminism. Fucking idiot MRAs once again shitting all over themselves because they are ignorant but I’m the one who needs to read, right?
/r/MensRights04/03/20 10:50 PM
-8

adverb: figuratively 1. used to indicate a departure from a literal use of words; metaphorically. Two more downvotes for me and two more upvotes for you? How bizarre that everything you say immediately gets two upvotes and everything I say immediately gets two downvotes. Pathetic!
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:40 PM
-16

The lesbians and teenagers of the 1960s who had zero concern for or an immature view of adult relations between men and women when they pushed their feminist theories. Why did the homosexual reference offend you more than the teenager one? One is a protected group while the other is not? Perhaps I’m a horrible homophobe for presenting the idea that outliers shouldn’t be the example of common or best practices for the majority.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:02 PM
18

The hospital where my son was born warned us that once he leaves the hospital insurance won’t cover his circumcision and if we change our minds we’ll have to pay ‘out of pocket’. (Imagine thunder and lightning and a woman shrieking and the darkest night and a ‘dun dun DUN’ music effect when you read out of pocket.) It felt a lot like a sales pitch by the hospital staff for us to agree to an unnecessary procedure that generates billable hours for the hospital to the insurance company. I realize t…
/r/MensRights04/03/20 11:45 AM
-20

Who would of thought that by allowing homosexuals and teenagers to write theories and philosophies you would wind up with such anti-human absurdities. Oh, did you say third wave feminism? I was talking about second wave feminism. Sorry. Go on about the problems of third wave feminism...
/r/MensRights04/03/20 11:23 AM
1

Her premise is wrong because in many cases ‘family’ has already been abolished and fatherhood is currently akin to an ATM machine. Her actual theory is that feminism can’t have a future without women abolishing motherhood or better still feminism can’t have a future because women can make a unilateral decision to bring a baby to term and keep it. Feminism can’t exist because, when giving unlimited choices, women make wrong choices. Feminism has no future not because it works against women’s own …
/r/MensRights04/03/20 11:11 AM
3

The facts are also hidden behind baffling factoids like: However, of children under 5 killed by someone other than their parent, 80% of the people that were convicted were males. Parents were responsible for 61-percent of child murders under the age of five. More than 40% of the killers in these crimes were mothers, with fathers making up about 57% of those who killed their own offspring. Obviously somebody knows the stat for children under the age of five being murdered by their mother but it’s…
/r/MensRights01/03/20 12:32 PM
4

‘Allowed’ until there’s a ditch to dig, a bill to pay, or a life to be lost. If men were allowed to be children for even a day we’d be digging ourselves out of that catastrophe for years.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 11:28 AM
6

When did men’s liberation from their roles to women and society occur? Does it not occur to you that my obligations to society and women are exactly the same as they were when men wore armour into battle on horseback 700 years ago? We men have a mandate to facilitate women’s needs no matter how trivial before our own no matter how pressing and therefor so long as women present any problem it takes the highest priority over all of our unresolved problems.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 04:53 PM
2

In Canada it was estimated that 5,000 women will die of breast cancer in 2019 and 55 men. I think the blue gem on a pink field is a perfect symbol for men with breast cancer because it acknowledges both their existence and their rarity at a single glance.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:57 PM
2

Women do not generally participate in warfare or enjoy its spoils and so they tend to compete only with relatives in their home group. Wives and future wives don’t profit from their husband’s spoils? Like most social scientists and politicians today they choose to ignore the fact that men and women are not disconnected and alone but are primarily partners in life working together with their best foot forward for mutual benefit. In order for a male to have offspring he needs to illustrate his abi…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:44 PM
2

I don’t think that person knows what “false” means.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 10:52 AM
3

They’ve done study after study for years about various different social interests and their influence on people’s behaviour and have come to the same conclusions - people pursuing an interest are not as delusional about it as others would like to pretend. There are people who are susceptible to influences however and those people are unable to reason due to age or illness. Note that he points to underage children who are prohibited from watching porn as an example of why porn itself is bad but n…
/r/MensRights24/02/20 05:52 PM
3

It’s worse than that because it can be based on one person’s perspective informed by their prejudice and the prejudice of the onlookers which may not be true in reality.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:09 PM
1

If gender is a ‘social construct’ either women are wrong for crying or men are wrong for not crying and since certain women have cornered the market on gender studies women can’t be wrong for anything, so, men must cry, but not for their own sake, but because women cry.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 12:49 PM
1

I’d counter with: yes, it’s okay for men to cry but not okay to insinuate that men should cry.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 12:38 PM
0

We do teach our children (let’s face it they mean males) to treat women with respect but the little bastards and women, for some reason, continue to try and involve themselves in mutual romantic relationships instead of focusing on more important things like commerce. It’s almost as if men and women are drawn to each other on a personal level that neither group can ignore and search for mutually beneficial companionship wherever they can get it. Don’t these motherfuckers know that commerce is im…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:21 PM
1

Men typically solve their own problems and blame themselves first, and we perceive obvious flattery and platitudes as city states should of Greeks bearing gifts of large wooden sculptures. These tendencies are significantly more beneficial in most instances than not so I’m not sure why it’s being painted as a problem. If a man is reaching out for help he actually needs help and not some useless word salad. Please don’t ask me to be more like women or treat me like women, if I ever ask for help g…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:46 AM
96

Another example of ‘female years’. Take a female’s age and subtract anywhere from 1/3 to 1/2 and you get her age when she’s compared to any male. In this case a 30 year old woman becomes a teenaged girl and get’s a sentence appropriate to her ‘female years’ age gap. Now, if a thirty year old man did this then the teenaged girl suddenly becomes a 6 year old in ‘female years’ so obviously everybody loses their minds.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 12:11 AM
4

What do you call a female janitor? According to that article you call them a maid, pay them less, and use it as an indication of gender disparity. Of course, everybody whose nose is a bit closer to the ground and don’t live in ivory towers can smell it as bullshit fairly quickly - a female janitor is called a janitor and their job is similar to a maid but also different enough that nobody except an entirely ignorant ass would mistake the two. There’s a reason why janitors are paid more than maid…
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:05 PM
1

If they didn’t want the responsibility of fatherhood they should of kept their pants on is something pro life people say to men and women and if you aren’t pro life you are a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 02:29 PM
1

What’s with the ’way ahead of time’ stipulation? Kids as late as 4 and up are sometimes given up for adoption. If a person finds parenthood a struggle and no longer desires the responsibility why do we insist that they keep going just because the other parent isn’t willing to also throw in the towel? It’s shocking how my wife and I have less responsibilities as people who wanted babies than a man who just wanted sex!
/r/MensRights16/02/20 02:21 PM
1

The ones with the X and Y pass on their X or Y to their offspring so they are pretty darn important and have been there since the beginning passing on their X or Y to the next generation over and over and over. Y is not a mutation from THE human chromosome it’s a human chromosome.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 04:53 AM
2

You can start by explaining how sexual assault is a gender issue and not an interpersonal issue. From my understanding the crime of sexual assault is between a specific offender and a specific victim not a crime between one gender and another. I know why your mind jumped there but I want you to figure it out for yourself... it will help for you to understand just why your proposition of working together on common gender issues is doomed to fail for people interested in helping men. If you don’t …
/r/MensRights13/02/20 12:22 AM
5

It depends on whether he was punished for arguing with the teacher or on how he was arguing with the teacher. My 20 years of internet experience and 12 years of institutional learning kinda makes me think it’s both but officially it’s the latter.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 01:54 PM
7

If she’s correct then ‘let’s go have sex in my car’ would be sufficient for any man to engage in sexual intercourse with all women, but, as it turns out, women’s conditioning in that area isn’t sufficient to cause any viable effect. Yes, in order to obtain true consent both people need to be utterly free from any duress, but her application of this is extremely dishonest, the principle she’s using only applies to the men in women’s lives and not when it comes to sex which is governed by another …
/r/MensRights08/02/20 01:23 PM
1

Most countries require you by law to register a birth and in that process the child is given their identity by the parents not the state.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 11:08 AM
2

Around half can be given to the other parent. They’ll use it by giving the ‘nearly half’ of their paternity leave to their wife and extending her current allotted leave. If Finland really gave a shit about paternity leave they wouldn’t allow this exchange to happen but instead, under the guise of gender ‘equality’, but by the code of chivalry that men adhere to when it comes to women (especially the women in their lives), they simply extended the mother’s leave. This is how feminism works - it c…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 10:28 AM
2

Or perhaps just maybe... that’s what women wanted? Although my wife is highly capable of killing her own spiders she offloads the job to me because she doesn’t like spiders. She also doesn’t like being too hot, tiresome physical labour, feeling anxious, being utterly alone for long periods of time, not being able to socialize with the people around her, facing dangers that will permanently blemish her skin, being away from her children for more than an afternoon, going out alone after dark, feel…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 04:00 AM
1

Not really. There are actually people who pursue abusive people because that’s normal to them and in the absence of an abuser they will instigate fights from non violent people. If a non violent person spends anytime with one of these people it will not be long until they are made violent.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 02:08 PM
5

You can alienate people by being an asshole and saying ‘I hate men’ and ‘fuck white people’ makes you an asshole.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 11:57 AM
1

You only think that because you’re focusing on the individual victim of the sexism and not the popularized political victim class. I too prefer to see these people as idiots, or perhaps being so far removed from human suffering that they are oblivious to it, rather than willful participants in furthering an individuals suffering for political points.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 11:37 AM
11

Lemme guess.... they are repackaging the codes of chivalry when it comes to women as something new and not something men have lived by from cradle to grave for the past 700 years?
/r/MensRights30/01/20 09:37 AM
1

If you have sex with three people in three days, it makes sense you're gonna have some marks. The count is two people not three but I can see where you got confused by the way it was written.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 09:17 AM
10

Housing not houses - there’s a big difference. Yes, it sucks that men, or worse father’s with kids, aren’t included in this but let’s face it - no matter how violent a woman is - HE will be seen as the problem. Women need to be seen as equal offenders first before any progress can be made with regards to domestic violence and the establishment isn’t anywhere near seeing women as anything but victims.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 09:48 AM
1

That would mean that the men’s bathroom actually exists but it just isn’t in the pic.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 06:41 PM
9

Speaking of payment... My company pays me to work for them. Somehow people lose sight of this fact when they learn that my wife is a stay at home mom - they overwhelmingly consider her to be my ‘paid’ employee for the things she does at home but don’t consider me to be her unpaid employee for the things I do at home - it’s as if the company I work for pays me on her behalf. If she’s my employee aren’t I then her unpaid intern? Or maybe, just maybe, it’s like you’ve pointed out above - the things…
/r/MensRights24/01/20 10:57 PM
6

Emotional labour isn’t a ‘feminist theory’ but a theory that was twisted to support a feminist political agenda. The author of it saw it more as a tool to help people and not something to attack people with - much like all the other helpful social insights that are fashioned into weapons to beat ‘other’ people over the head with. Cultural appropriation, micro aggressions, etc. were intended as tools meant to further our understanding of each other but are too often used to create further divisio…
/r/MensRights24/01/20 10:35 PM
1

That’s the entire point! It’s a satirical parody of feminism! Parody: writing, music, art, speech, etc. that intentionally copies the style of someone famous or copies a particular situation, making the features or qualities of the original more noticeable in a way that is humorous: Satire: a way of criticizing people or ideas in a humorous way, especially in order to make a political point, or a piece of writing that uses this style Don’t protect or defend meninism - it’s doing what it’s suppos…
/r/MensRights22/01/20 11:29 PM
-3

You folk realize that meninism is a parody of feminism right...? Right!?!!? An attack on meninism by feminists is the punchline to an ongoing joke that continues to mock feminism. Please stop thinking that meninism needs to be protected from feminism because then you become the joke.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 03:20 AM
1

More than anti-social disorders and/or psychoactive substance use?
/r/MensRights22/01/20 03:09 AM
2

Yep, without addressing the full dynamics when it comes to domestic violence, and including the behaviours of both people involved, they aren’t ending the violence - they are ensuring it’s perpetuation! That’s a solid business plan if your business is collecting money by donations by exhibiting women as damsels in distress rather than equally violent people.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 09:48 PM
13

Well, it would seem that most men decide to transition to the incredibly difficult life path of transgender because they hate to be on a losing team. I would think that by most measures it would be a far easier life to be just a man than transgender but, according to her or him, that’s not the case! Apparently being a woman, even a transgender one, is such a ridiculously easy life path that all the negative aspects of being transgender in society, and there are a bunch, are totally worth the tra…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 07:55 PM
3

Look at her merely existing to be important! She‘s just casually standing around with her arms in the air as if to say: Ta-da! Here I am world - a woman of the future! Value me! Give that lady a job - she’s the future so she’ll have to do more than razzle dazzle us with her oddly masculine physique and Edna Mode hairstyle!
/r/MensRights18/01/20 10:56 AM
1

Imagine a train that makes three stops: At the first stop women earn the right to board the train without paying. At the second stop women also don’t pay and plus earn the right to choose whatever seat they want and men must take whatever is remaining. At the third stop women are fighting to maintain their free passes and primary choices but they are seen as not fine? Lol!
/r/MensRights18/01/20 10:18 AM
13

Imagine the man who thinks that he and his demographic are so darn superior to women and minorities that he feels that he needs to type this crap in order to secure a friendship with them. It probably never occurred to him that his fact is wrong and that 300,000 people kill themselves in China and India a year or that China and India are governed by Chinese and Indian people - nope, it’s those fantastically glorious whites and their premium maleness that’s so impossibly superior that only their …
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:10 PM
6

Human rights exists to prevent people from using imaginary phantoms and scenarios to create for themselves exclusionary places. Without using your imagination explain to me why humans of any characteristic needs a ‘safe space’?
/r/MensRights11/01/20 06:11 PM
1

It’s sad to watch the trials and tribulations of people who torture themselves with the ideology that gender is a social construct so men and women need to meet each other at the halfway point between masculinity and femininity.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:15 PM
5

Well, I don’t support male genital mutilation, and I also don’t support pissing on people’s graves. Kellogg didn’t have our modern understanding of the scientific method at the time he promoted his junk theories. If he was given a choice that would be different, but by having not been given a choice, it’s not exactly fair to judge him so harshly or anybody for that matter. Kellogg mutilated himself in adulthood because he believed in a lie and rather than see him as a victim you piss on his grav…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 06:49 PM
1

Well that’s weird! My wife never wore Mom jeans when I was just dating her... Go back to two X chromosomes where those super macho uber women have all agreed to pee standing up and hate the colour pink.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 11:47 PM
6

That’s just a bunch of gibberish she crafted to drive yet another gender wedge between men and women by making it look like somebody believes that women are the principal culprits responsible for male baby’s genital mutilation. This is not the men vs. women issue that she wants to make it into for her own political points and shifty purposes. She beating on the backs of mutilated infants as if they were the drums of war and it’s sickening to see.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 10:33 PM
4

And here we see that having only one side liberated from their responsibilities to the other makes any request by the other side a threat to liberty.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:12 PM
5

She’s full of shit. She’s pretending that feminism isn’t the establishment and therefor feminists are fighting oppressive systems of the patriarchy! Very sexy! Of course our reality is that too many prominent people have declared themselves feminists for that fool to act like she needs to hide her feminism. Feminism isn’t fighting the establishment they are the establishment fighting to maintain their political authority on gender.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 02:19 PM
1

I have two small kids, so I barely watch adult TV, and even I know too much about the two latest shootings in America and the media speculation surrounding them. A few months ago a section of a freeway that passed under a bridge near me was closed down for a few hours and I was detoured over the bridge that had a part of the railing taped off. The top of the bridge also had several police officers and a police photographer looking over the sectioned off railing down to the freeway below. It was …
/r/MensRights01/01/20 11:55 PM
14

That’s right folks let’s overlook the simplest explanation - that there’s actually three doors and the men’s door is not in the photo and to the OP you are a nursery of up-votin’ rubes. He’s telling you that an architect drew up plans for a million dollar building consisting of only a women’s bathroom with a single use handicap bathroom and got it approved despite the fact that it’s against every building code I’m aware of? Seems reasonable right? Reasonable... that reminds me of the good ole da…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 11:36 PM
1

Is it really that important to you that these instances are overly reported, pointlessly discussed to the minutiae, made multiple erroneous commentaries about, and then falsely speculated on? A dummy shot up a school somewhere in a different place than where you live? Why do you need to know what they ate for breakfast or what sort of student they were or the home-life they had or the weapon they used, or the number of shots they fired or how their kill count stacks up against the others - you l…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 06:51 AM
1

It’s wrong to present women as marginalized contributors to scientific accomplishments when you consider that most scientific work is marginal with a few sparks of original genius. Do the ladies of the Harvard Observatory and their serious work deserve the same scientific regard as Galileo? Under those terms doesn’t the work of those brilliant women become marginalized not because they are women but because their work was marginal and as marginal as the other entirely unknown men who have also a…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 12:24 AM
2

Not in this case because future shooters identify with and then emulate past shooters (Copycat killing) so the cycle of emulation ends when we stop giving notoriety to these people or events.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 11:22 PM
0

Tits on a ten year old boy isn’t an object of male sexual desire except in women’s magazines. From what I recall men like like a healthy figure rising noticeably at 19 spiking at 20 then declining noticeably at 22 and a sharp drop afterwards to near nothing after 25. Go web search ‘Helmut strebl” who’s the ‘world’s most shredded man’ and note that the search suggestions are about how to get his physique and not anything to do with sexual courtship then go and web search the other men in that art…
/r/MensRights29/12/19 11:14 PM
0

After what I typed about the media giving these fools notoriety you want me to do the same? Their identities should be blotted out of history and they should remain nameless and faceless mass of human dysfunction.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 02:07 PM
-10

If only men and women listened to each other instead of people trying to sell them ideas about sex. The most attractive physique for men when it comes to women is a figure on the upper end of the healthy side of the BMI and women feel the most attractive male physique is useful strength muscles.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 01:37 PM
2

Sorry, I should of stressed since the advent of television and the near instantaneous and in-depth stream of national news media commentary which obviously leads to the notoriety of the culprits. From that shooting and it’s coverage there sprung a series of copycats and media fame that hasn’t stopped to this day but the characteristics of the shooters have been refined to an almost singular identity.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 04:36 PM
2

The first school shooter was a female but the second, third, and fourth were male and as that continues females won’t identify with the archetype and the characteristics become more defined and further refined until only specific people can identify with the past culprits.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:34 PM
6

That’s an impressive list of dinosaurs that most people have never heard of and it’s both shocking and a crime that the discoverer of those entirely unknown boring dinosaurs isn’t a household name! Does the fact that I’d have to web search ‘who discovered the sexy T. Rex’ diminish your point on ‘she sells seashells on the seashore’? Let’s face it - outside of having an interest in palaeontology there’s no such thing as a famous palaeontologist male or female and because of that, using palaeontol…
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:12 PM
8

The idea is that men are on one side of the issue and women are on the other, of course, that’s absurd; men and women are both opposing and supporting abortion but that knowledge doesn’t allow for women to maintain their victim class status. It’s ironic that they choose to completely ignore women’s authority on subjects that these folks deems ‘wrongheaded’.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:50 PM
3

Only an aroused male gets ‘the horn’ and is therefor horny...
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:46 PM
1

I'm just saying that in terms of economics it kind of makes you like her employer and her your employee. Isn’t that only because you place value on physical currency but not what that currency represents? My earnings are ‘a means to an end’ and that end extends well beyond a collection of physical currency. Also, if my employer pays me for labour that I provide them and that process means that my wife is my employee - what does that make me for the jobs I do at home? I thought that I was a partn…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 04:33 PM
3

And here I thought the victim of a crime is a victim by the criminal act committed against them and not by any collective criminal statistical imbalances... but it turns out that if you employ sexism you can make the victim of a specific crime into the perpetrator and the perpetrator into the victim - ah, crap - that’s called reverse victimhood and it’s chiefly employed by abusive people.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 04:02 PM
6

I like the fact that it’ll teach my son resilience but not that in the process my daughter will learn dependence... So, it like like we’ll just stick to the evil patriarchal Mr. monopoly so that both my kids can learn positive life skills.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 03:34 PM
2

My income can only be accomplished with her at home managing the daily household events, if she was to work, even a part time job, I would have to reduce my overtime at work and increase my domestic labour at home to pair with her work effort. Her part time job or even full time job wouldn’t come close to matching my full time income much less at time-and-a-half or double-time. Unless you live under the improbable but optimal conditions that facilitate ‘total equality’ you, like the rest of us, …
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:49 PM
9

The assumption is that men want to cry but can’t cry because of social pressures but crying is an involuntary action due to an emotional stimulus - the tears will flow whether you want them to or not. What if I told you that men have as much control over their crying as women do? Would you argue that women should stop crying and make themselves useful during a stressful event? Would you demand that men cry more? Would you acknowledge that men typically don’t cry as readily as women so it would b…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:27 PM
2

The first person is claiming that women have bad jobs that have no health benefits and remain in loveless marriages so that they can keep their husbands health insurance. The second idiot wants men (remember that women have bad job so they won’t be paying for it) to pay for everybody’s health insurance.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 12:18 AM
8

A feminist film about a horribly immature woman failing to live up to her entirely voluntarily life choices? Say it ain’t so! Women need to be spared not from their unlimited choices but any of the responsibilities or accountabilities that might come with women’s unlimited choices - yep, that’s feminism.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 03:40 AM
19

If I told him on Friday I was spending Saturday chilling at a spa, he’d probably drop me there so I didn’t have to drive, then take the kids to their clubs before making sure the house was tidy. It looks like he’s working overtime when it comes to your ideals about domestic gender equality so why do you read that and think ‘equality’?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 11:58 AM
1

/news/weird-new... Weird news. Weird as an adjective: very strange; bizarre. Weird as a verb: induce a sense of disbelief or alienation in someone. Right time wrong place Phil.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 11:25 AM
1

I didn’t read your post ROFLMAO! That happened.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 10:25 AM
3

My wife says it all the time as a part of our division of labour. I don’t do her jobs and she doesn’t do mine - we tried it the other way and it turns out that by not having specific roles the job of doing anything my wife didn’t do fell on me so I was always blamed whenever anything wasn’t done. It was ridiculous. We divided our tasks mostly between pink and blue because it seemed to make the most sense after assessing our personal strengths, weaknesses, and personal preferences. It’s gotten me…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:10 AM
6

Rates of rape, sexual assault and homicide are actually lower in societies with more men than women, the study found. And, evolutionary theories predicting that when males outnumber females, males will compete vigorously for the limited number of mates don't bear out. https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/male-dominated-societies-are-not-more-violent-study-says
/r/MensRights16/12/19 11:43 PM
0

If your monetary value exchange was employed in my partnership with my wife I’d owe my wife for services rendered to me and would go quickly into debt... My wife and I have an equal partnership - my ability to produce wealth outside of the family partners with her ability to produce wealth inside of the family. By working together as we do we improve family wealth and create value for our family.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 07:25 PM
2

men are such babies if they get a little headache Imagine living with somebody who is normally so far from being considered infantile that a mild affliction like a headache gives somebody else bragging rights.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 07:04 PM
6

His aggression will be channeled in a meaningful and productive way. Aggression. What hope is there for masculinity when a pro-masculinity article claims that human aggression is an inherent trait of masculinity? ‘Social psychologists define aggression as behavior that is intended to harm another individual who does not wish to be harmed (Baron & Richardson, 1994).‘ I can’t think of any people I’ve met whose behaviour is defined by the above so aggression can’t possibly be an inherent human trai…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 11:51 PM
8

It reads like she portrayed herself as the victim of his sexual assault rather than the perpetrator and while under her victim hood influence he wasn’t able to see himself as the victim. There’s a good chance that he even felt guilty for ‘hurting’ her at the time and probably even a little bit afraid of the ramifications of her abuse accusation directed at him. I believe it’s called ‘victim reversal’.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 11:05 PM
1

My job pays me to work for them at the roughly the same hourly wage as when I was single (I earn more now) and the increase in bills was small and nowhere near doubled.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 03:06 AM
-1

Those stay at home moms were also single once upon a time so they also had to both work and handle domestic chores or do you honestly think there’s a big warehouse full of women sitting in boxes waiting for a man to order one of them off the internet? Because that’s really the only way what you said would make any sense.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:57 PM
1

The domestic half of my labour is now done by somebody else at the cost of something I was already doing when I was single... It’s not a question of hard work or time consumption - it’s a question of value to the other partner in the partnership. Sure, machines made lives easier, but do you know what’s even easier than that? Not having to do any of it at all!
/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:49 PM
2

Finally, feminists and men’s rights can agree on something! Grrrr, stay at home parents! M’right? Due to a (now resolved) medical condition I’ve done both and neither is easy - at work everybody pulls in one direction and at home you are pulled in multiple directions. Of course, not all stay at home parents are the same so the workloads and it’s value to the family units varies.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:08 PM
7

It’s enforced by an individual’s emotional disposition. A higher value is placed on men who are less emotional because they are more useful during a crisis. Here’s where women come in - if masculinity and femininity are social constructs then somebody is emotionally wrong or right when it comes to crying during trivialities - Mary Sue’s failure to remain valuable during a crisis needs to be addressed! or Mary Sue is right and it’s the less emotional people who are wrong! Men need to cry not beca…
/r/MensRights11/12/19 12:08 PM
1

(fear, safety) Was it really a fear of black women that significantly contributed to segregation? Was it the notion that white people were unsafe around black women that fuelled separate social spaces between whites and blacks? but obviously now that would be a terrible thing to do. So, if it wasn’t so much black women who were the people of concern... What would you get if white women couldn’t overcome their fears of men of colour in an age when racism is seen as bad?
/r/MensRights07/12/19 07:00 AM
5

Ha! That’s absurd! My LEGO box growing up didn’t have weapons in it, they made it a point not to have military stuff back then. Today? You can hardly buy a box without a weapon and fighter of some sort enclosed. Transformers are still around. Star Wars is still around. Gi joe has been replaced with Fortnite and halo action figures. A bucket of army men can still be bought and with more variety in warriors. Nerf guns have replaced cap guns but, as guns, they are more popular now than ever before,…
/r/MensRights07/12/19 06:04 AM
1

Words have meaning and the word ‘run’ in the context of that pic becomes a verb with a definition of ‘controlling the means of production.’ SJWs and feminists were the only people I was aware of that didn’t seem to grasp that words have meaning and now suddenly the MRAs seem to forget that words mean things. My guess is that this new and pervasive victimhood complex spreading around this sub is the culprit driving MRAs into abandoning logic and reason in favour of emotion and hysteria. Who runs …
/r/MensRights27/11/19 12:26 AM
-62

Is this supposed to be ironic? If that soldier belong to a typical military he doesn’t run his own life and needs permission from his commanding officer to do anything from home ownership to something as trivial as taking a piss on occasion. Lol. Men own the world! And then show a picture of one of the least enfranchised man in the world! Lol what a fucking time to be alive!
/r/MensRights19/11/19 06:01 PM
1

It’s only a derogatory term because of it’s association with homosexual men in the same manner as retard is a derogatory term because of it’s association with people who have Down syndrome. The original term comes first and then relating it to others in the form of an insult comes second. By calling a male a faggot you are attempting to, from your perspective, negatively associate them with what you perceive as something undesirable which in this case is being a homosexual male. You’re the one w…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:13 AM
-2

Gay men and straight women suck dicks nobody else so when you use that as an example of something undesirable in conjunction with using words like faggot a specifically derogatory term used against homosexual men you paint a clear picture of what exactly you think about the behaviour of gay men and it’s not ‘different strokes for different folks’ is it? Do you have any comment to add about my counterpoint or just the edit I made as an afterthought?
/r/MensRights12/11/19 11:04 PM
2

Sounds like she needs to give him the 4/7 arrangement so that she can make more money but I’m sure that’s never occurred to her.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 02:46 PM
-10

Yes, because... although sticks and stones will break your bones, it’s name calling that requires a violent defence? Violence is a specialty tool that’s only really useful for stopping further violence and only one of those two boys used the tool correctly. Should ‘crooked Hillary’, the ‘weak’ PM of Canada, and ‘the rocket man ‘ beat up a 73 year old man for his bullying of them? That’s not how bullying and violence works as adults so that’s not how we should guide our young teenagers into utili…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 02:31 PM
2

Being called a lair is a worse fate than being forcibly confined?
/r/MensRights12/11/19 02:11 PM
2

black people That’s not how you spell black-men and the fact that racism is unfashionable is the entire point driving this new attack on ‘men’. The preferred men of women are still in the in-group and every other man is still in the out-group but the reasoning behind it is more obscure and less obvious.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 11:03 PM
2

Kill two birds with one stone and grow them out and style them for men’s health awareness?
/r/MensRights06/11/19 05:24 AM
9

Examining ‘family income’ closes all of the cooked-up gender gaps.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 05:05 AM
2

As a single man I was my own provider and caregiver. As a married man I am the family provider to my wife’s family caregiver. Do you really think I sought out a partnership so that I could just do both rolls anyway? That’s silly! My wife and I took a partner to carry the half of our loads that we didn’t want to carry at the cost of something each of us were doing for ourselves anyway. In fact, her domestic load increased by adding +1 (now +3) while my half of the provider load has remained the e…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 04:52 AM
2

My dads always loved me and supported me, hes my coach and my cornerman, my greatest champion, my hero, mentor and role model. Wait until she discovers that those behaviours will also be exhibited by her husband.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 04:08 AM
11

Oxymoron.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 03:55 AM
1

Women work nowadays so there needs to be an equitable division of labour to reflect that. The sole provider being supported by a caregiver is no longer possible for most families interested in maintaining their middle class standard. These days the primary family provider is a secondary family caregiver which compliments the secondary family provider is also a primary family caregiver.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 03:35 AM
15

Let’s convince boys that they aren’t resilient! Oh, wait... that’s a bad thing.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:25 PM
2

I’ve done everything I can to protect the image of my daughters mom and her family That’s a hill not worth fighting for so stop fighting for it because while you are pouring all of your resources into it you are losing your daughter and who wins in the end? Not you and not your daughter. Your daughter is what counts and her relationship with you and by being the ‘better man’ you are making your daughter fatherless.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 08:25 PM
5

You should of asked her whether or not she’s prepared to put herself in physical danger to defend a man from a violent women. If her answer is anything different than ‘yes’ then she needs to present a solution that allows the man to be free from violence without using violence to protect himself.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 08:06 PM
8

Benevolent sexism has more benefits than drawbacks so there’s virtually no pushback against it.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 07:51 PM
0

Name-calling is not a counterpoint. Do you have anything to add that will result in a conversation about this because sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting names isn’t going to stop the fact that the vast majority of men are inherently masculine and masculine behaviour directly benefits women and children. A man exhibiting masculine traits and behaviours can not be an enemy of men since the vast majority of men agree with his behaviour. I’m behaving inline with my inherent traits that …
/r/MensRights30/10/19 07:42 PM
1

Masculinity is a series of inherent traits that are significantly different than women’s inherent traits that define femininity. You have two options: obey your inherent masculinity or, by willpower, reject your masculinity and embrace femininity. I’ll support your decision to reject masculinity and embrace femininity but I seriously doubt you’ve done that have you? Ironically, you’d be hard pressed to find a homeless man who doesn’t support helping homeless women before helping him.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 02:54 AM
2

They probably need to move one size up. Not all condoms are the same size and using a regular condom while being irregularly sized makes it a less pleasant experience for both the man and the woman.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 06:16 PM
1

take control of their dating lives I see that and think: Women there are abandoning the gatekeeper role and actively command their own sexual wants??!?!!! Then I go there and read some posts: Oh, it’s about women strictly adhering to the gatekeeper role to the point of their great grandmother’s prudery... For a second there I thought maybe gender traits weren’t so inherent after all.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 06:12 PM
0

Is Doug Ford really different than any other man in being ‘an enemy of men’ as you put it? By placing women and children first Doug Ford is embracing an aspect of masculinity and if masculinity is the cumulative traits of men how can he be an enemy of men? This is why patriarchy theory is such bullshit - masculinity prevents men from exercising power for the sake of other men. A father works for the benefit of his wife and children not the man next door or the homeless man down the street. You m…
/r/MensRights25/10/19 12:03 PM
2

We don’t need to imagine - it’s called victim blaming and there’s a massive pushback against it when it comes to sex assaults against women, so much so, that a judge was recently forced to resign for asking why a victim couldn’t just keep her knees together.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:34 AM
3

Escalated? They were the founders of feminism and it’s you and your ‘great people’ that are denying them their heritage by co-opting their already established identity.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:24 AM
2

Because words have meaning and the word feminism signifies an ideology defined (and limited) by patriarchy theory and rape culture.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 07:55 PM
1

It’s a men’s liberation movement to liberate men from their ancient obligations to women and society. It’s about giving the choices that women got during their own liberation from men and society to men also. Sounds good right? Who doesn’t want people to live free? There’s a problem... we live in a binary system and women’s liberation gave women the first choice and men are expected to chivalrously accept whatever option women don’t choose so every choice a man gets to make means one less choice…
/r/MensRights22/10/19 07:27 PM
2

Like all things related to gender and government policy it’s probably derived from the raw statistics of men compared to women without any consideration of spousal partnerships or extenuating circumstances. So, the fact that I have a larger carbon footprint when compared to my wife becomes the significant factor and not that most of my greenhouse gas emitting automobile driving is for the collective benefit of both my wife and I - she doesn’t drive so I drive her places and statistically absorb …
/r/MensRights22/10/19 07:25 AM
2

Men support women over men as a part of our instincts so when presented with a choice between a man and a woman to suffer the man will choose the man to suffer and a woman will also choose the man to suffer. This doubling down against men was satisfactory when women’s access to direct power was accessed thru a man but now it’s making modern women who have access to both direct power and influential power unsuitable partners to men.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:52 AM
15

Everybody in the world doesn’t seem confused by the difference between humans and robots except the people who have a moral objection to robots. It’s giant sex toy not an artificial human Being and the people who use them are going to be the ones who aren’t able to land a date with a human being.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:40 AM
1

The establishment’s solution to the problem of racism was to make it unfashionable to be racist against specific races - the problem of racism is not solved by this so other people become fashionable to victimize and the protected races are always vulnerable to having their protections removed.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:25 AM
1

Women are always being encouraged to stir masculine traits into their feminine recipe. They are encouraged by other women who perceive femininity as lesser than masculinity and view traditional female roles as domestic drudgery and significantly less preferable than corporate drudgery. Even this fool wants to improve femininity’s value by getting the ‘glorious master race’ to embrace it. Total masculinity is truly ‘a bridge too far’ for women so the aspects of masculinity that women can’t achiev…
/r/MensRights17/10/19 11:34 AM
19

Hey ladies, do you like working alone for long periods of time without any meaningful social interaction and virtually nobody to help you obtain a problem solving consensus with?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:50 PM
1

Healthier doesn’t mean happier. Data from the General Social Survey (GSS) collected between 2010 and 2018 indicated that married people with children are slightly happier than married people without children who are happier than divorced people who are happier than the most miserable of all which are single people. I’ll trust their study specifically about happiness over her study about healthiness to determine who has the most joy in their lives.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:42 PM
1

Feminism is a male-emulation indoctrination. Feminists have less respect for femininity than the aspects of masculinity that they can’t achieve which feminism has deemed toxic masculinity. As a single father you are also pulling double duty but not because of an indoctrination like her but out of necessity and you seem to recognize that you are also over exerting yourself doing the roles of both genders. Forgive the lateness of my reply but I’ve been working a lot lately.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 09:27 AM
-14

I think that you as a MGTOW and her are missing the same point: She’s only tired because she, as a woman, has been indoctrinated into the vain attempt of emulating a man as much as her willpower can muster. When she says that men aren’t indoctrinated into ‘sacrifice like women’ are she’s right because men aren’t expected to or inclined to pull double duty as both a quasi-woman and a man. Her fault is in the fact that she doesn’t seem to recognize where the pressure she’s feeling is coming from s…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 03:22 AM
2

and that people tend to gravitate toward a partner with roughly the same level of attainment. Is that the new way of spelling women when you are about to say something that makes women look like bad people? Male CEOs marry school teachers - female CEOs marry male CEOs.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 02:29 AM
2

To be fair it’s limited to ‘Canadian women’ and then they add the further limitation to ‘the progression of Canada’s culture and legacy’. A nation with a boring history up until the last hundred years limited by a nonsensical statements about ‘culture and legacy’. Canada’s legacy is fur trapping Frenchmen vs. fur trapping Indians all selling beaver pelts to Englishmen because beaver fur once made nice European hats. With a legacy like that it’s hard to come up with an interesting person male or …
/r/MensRights09/10/19 12:46 PM
3

A place for women with sexist insecurities about men and hardened hearts over their dried up ovaries finally have a place to go, but do they allow cats on the premises?
/r/MensRights30/09/19 12:46 PM
6

It’s getting so crazy these days that it’s almost believable.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 12:12 PM
2

She most likely reserves those views only for men and that’s only after a woman has made her choice. It’s ‘lady’s choice’ and men fill in whatever position isn’t assigned today; and tomorrow? It depends on how madam is feeling of course! The result is that men end up being blamed for anything not done around the house whenever madam chooses not. That’s not the foundation to a successful marriage and is incredibly stressful for men and the solution couldn’t be easier... define your family roles t…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 10:07 AM
2

I seem to recall that it’s because males have significantly less objections to being utterly alone for a substantial length of time and are more comfortable with making decisions without seeking a consensus which are often requirements for STEM jobs. I’m willing to wager the ad for this program (if they had one) has picture of a bunch of girls doing social activities over a girl sitting alone pencil in hand working diligently on math problems.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 04:10 PM
1

The Arizona legislature actually removed the sexual intent requirement from its child molestation law in an effort to secure more convictions. When they did this they made changing diapers and washing kids technically a felony crime which is why I used them as examples.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 03:54 PM
25

because it's a woman who has to deal with the consequences of pregnancy and termination A life time of fatherhood isn’t a consequence of pregnancy? The termination of a baby has no psychological impact on the father? It’s as if that spokesperson has never had to consider the male perspective but feels confident speaking about men’s experiences. Since she’s also a spokesperson for men does she get two paycheques?
/r/MensRights26/09/19 03:25 PM
3

She slights them in the second half of the same sentence that assures us that they don’t need to defend themselves and this contradiction actually encourages men to talk about their dicks more than it dissuades them. It reads like her conscious and subconscious thoughts about men talking about their dicks don’t seem to agree with each other. ;)
/r/MensRights26/09/19 05:27 AM
157

Every person who believes that child should be considered a sex offender should also be considered a sex offender if they’ve ever hugged or kissed the cheek of any underaged child including their own children or accept that hugging and kissing are not exclusively sexual activities sometimes they are just an expression of fondness. A grandmother kissing her underage granddaughter is now the depraved act of lesbian sex abuse? Good lord! I wash my children. I’ve changed diapers. I’m always up for k…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:04 PM
3

Is that fact that water is wet shocking to you too?
/r/MensRights22/09/19 06:10 PM
1

Every damn woman in that room failed in their responsibility to protect him from having to defend himself and they only stepped in when she got him good enough that he succumb to his basic instinct of self-preservation. If you insist that men can’t defend themselves from violent women then you are responsible for defending men.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 06:06 PM
3

4.6 men kill themselves to every one woman in Iceland. The USA 3.3, Canada 2.6, Australia 2.9, and UK 3.4. Iran 1.5 and Saudi Arabia 2.7. In fact, Icelandic men enjoy the highest life expectancy in Europe. They live almost as long as women do. Iceland 81.4 for men and 84.4 for women is a three year difference. The USA has a five year difference, Canada has a 4 year difference, Australia has a 4 year difference, and the UK has a 3 year difference. Iran has a 2 year difference and Saudi Arabia has…
/r/MensRights15/09/19 04:21 PM
2

It’s also important to note that by most dictionary definitions MRAs by definition are absurdly feminist but once you start to review the philosophy: everybody starts dropping away from feminism faster than superman can fly.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 01:31 PM
2

Your point above proves the opposite because you have women on one side wanting one thing and feminists at odds with them. It’s not your fault since feminists go out of their way to conflate their ideology with women which protects their precious ideology from any ridicule; this makes any attack on the ideology of feminism an attack on women themselves so anybody who criticizes feminism isn’t criticizing the ridiculous and sloppy philosophy of feminism but is in fact an evil misogynist attacking…
/r/MensRights13/09/19 01:23 PM
1

Or perhaps women and feminism are two starkly different groups of people with different ambitions, wants, and desires so neither of them need to consider the other person’s conditions.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 02:02 AM
-1

MRAs are great at determining apex fallacies against men but routinely fall for them and in this case promote them when it comes to women.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 01:35 PM
1

Is it really about the appetizer? If those single ladies are looking for a partnership with the expectation of being the primary caregiver which was (and still is no matter how much feminists want to pretend otherwise) both our cultural standard and embraces our natural gender inclinations then her date needs to prove his ability to be the primary provider and he does that by being generous with her. His fault is that he’s trading sex for a sandwich to a woman who looking to be his spouse not hi…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 12:02 PM
2

Not when people use statistics to implicate entirely innocent people of a crime.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:58 AM
1

I love grouping people and completely ignoring that there are billions of unique individuals. It’s bad when the ‘other’ people do it but it’s okay when they do it.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:53 AM
1

Is that not an opportunity for women to break from their most ancient traditional gender role of being the primary caregiver?
/r/MensRights09/09/19 01:37 PM
-1

a pretty girl Is that anything like the powerful man apex fallacy? Yes, yes it is.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 01:05 PM
1

Does anybody remember when heterosexuals meddled into the affairs of homosexuals? As a lesbian... neither does she, maybe the other members of the gay community can tell her why it’s a bad thing to do so she should just shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:58 PM
5

How can you be here for any length of time without realizing that the ‘women are wonderful’ effect is one of the biggest problems and obstacles facing men’s rights? What’s the argument against ‘men are trash but women are wonderful’ without cataloging the dirty shit women have done? ‘Women are so wonderful they’d never help commit a holocaust’ is only accepted if you don’t know about the SS-Helferin. ‘Women are so wonderful they’d never shoot up schools’ is only accepted if you don’t know that A…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 12:10 PM
3

Add an alarm clock. Now I’m an engineer! Choo choo! And straight and white and male so there goes the diversity neighbourhood, I guess?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:11 AM
-17

It also explains the pink tax - the escalator is a very masculine blue.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 10:57 AM
2

Girls like prefabricated non-sexually threatening pretty boy bands - they buy the magazines that detail their exciting lives, posters of them smouldering at the camera, and, oh, right! the music too. How can an adult woman not remember what it’s like to be a young girl?
/r/MensRights24/08/19 11:45 AM
2

Aren’t the boys the ones being objectified under the terms I’ve described above? Or is it understood by you that sexual attraction isn’t objectification when it’s a girl’s fantasy or her describing her sexual attraction or sexual fantasy to and of boys; it’s only the boys describing their sexual attraction to girls that makes it objectification? Let me make it clear for you: sexual attraction is not objectification by either gender. There is not one human on this planet who can suppress or contr…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:39 AM
1

Teenaged boys on parade with a less mature perspective on sexual attraction trying to separate themselves for the eyes of teenaged girls with a less mature perspective on sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 08:54 AM
4

Don’t accept heterosexual relationship advice from mercenary lesbians.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 12:30 PM
2

Agreed, but I think you’ll discover that when they talk about expressing emotions it’s usually about crying physical tears and little else because that’s really the only emotion that’s scales differently between men and women. Men must cry because women cry and men must sob because women sob and not because it’s particularly helpful to men but because if gender is a social construct then men not crying as readily as women means somebody is defective and it’s certainly not our little Mary Sue. Me…
/r/MensRights19/08/19 06:12 PM
6

And yet every heterosexual girl in that class has often fantasized about: Being perceived as sexy by men. A man’s ability to use violence in her defence. Bad boys Stoicism Non-effeminate men.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 01:24 PM
3

There’s an illusion (even around here) that men have some mysterious control over their emotions that no other person has and if that’s the case then this behaviour makes perfect sense. I say ‘even around here’ because every few days somebody comes in and pretends that they are stoic but not because it’s in their nature as men but because they ‘learned’ to control their entirely uncontrollable emotions by the behaviour of others seen on the right panel. Men are less inclined to cry because cryin…
/r/MensRights19/08/19 11:29 AM
1

People only copycat the people they feel they relate to.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 08:42 AM
24

Safer AND easier are the two dragons that need to be slain in order to rescue women from the terror of bicycle riding. Men? Try ten year old boys and girls who live too close to school to qualify for busing but too far to walk all the time.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 08:35 AM
14

There’s a gender gap there too - so the easier and safer we make soup kitchens...
/r/MensRights16/08/19 08:21 AM
10

Yep, it’s just regular old fashion sexism victimizing another group of people.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:35 PM
1

Male feminists like all feminists place women’s need above all others so as long as women have a need, no matter how trivial, it puts men’s equality, no matter how pressing, on the bottom of the list. It’s okay, they’ll wait on shared parenting and focus of the scourge of manspreading or the terrible oppression that comes in the form of responsibility that modern women have that coincides with their unlimited personal choices.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:30 PM
5

And when that serves it’s purpose they’ll purge it from the internet and only Men’s rights will remember what NOW did and shortly after that some naive person will march in here wondering why MRA have a problem with feminism or can’t work under the umbrella of feminism.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:57 PM
6

Go to your local library and check your area’s building code - I think you’ll find their plans are against the code.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 12:05 PM
615

Notice that men are to blame for the original wage gap and men are also to blame for the other wage gap?
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:56 AM
3

This highlights another problem with feminism - it’s largely fuelled and driven by inexperienced teenagers.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:26 AM
1

So... you are wrong? How about next time just admit your error and bow out with grace instead of making up a story about what I meant. I’m indicating that a man’s feelings are not hinged on any single specific activity so using a single specific activity to determine a man’s feelings is absurd. You’ve made a logical fallacy that’s not necessarily true: Men want celebration sex therefor they MUST BE sex starved therefor they MUST BE unhappy. That’s quite an initial leap of logic and then another …
/r/MensRights12/08/19 05:39 PM
1

It’s not a lie - it’s an inherent difference between the genders - men bond over activities and women bond over conversations. Inferring that men’s happiness hinges on the amount of sex they have with their wife kinda suggests otherwise... happiness and sex are not the same thing but they are being used here like they are synonymous. How about... asking for sex on an event day is low hanging fruit and not an indication that there’s a big problem? Ask 1000 on Sunday what they want from their wife…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 03:08 PM
1

Sex doesn’t determine a happy marriage. Yes, sex is important for men, more important to men than women, but that’s not the end all be all to a marriage. There’s a partnership between two people that involves more benefits than a sexual relationship. My wife can’t be replaced with a prostitute because sex on demand doesn’t make her my wife. However, as a man’s exclusive sexual partner wives should be receptive to men’s sexual needs and ignoring those needs places women in a precarious position -…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:58 AM
1

Males with a severe mental disorder identifying with similar males who’ve performed the behaviour which both refines and strengthens the identity of the culprit into a similar identity. In order for there to be a copycat the person has to identify with the ‘leader’ they are emulating and as more people of a similar identity copycat other people are less likely to copycat.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 12:33 PM
5

Add to that the fact that the men are typically doing the work that doesn’t involve face time with customers and it’s even less surprising.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:59 AM
130

White men as a class have lost their preferred position amongst white women but individually they are still part of a white women’s in-group. White woman: Men’s r evil, but not MY husband, MY brother, MY father, MY friends, or MY sons, they are good people, but other men? Grrrrr! Evil! There’s no danger in that since white women can have their cake and are still able to eat it.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:50 AM
1

rejecting the traditional path that leads to what many now regard as a life of domestic drudgery. Hooray for the life of corporate drudgery! Hooray!
/r/MensRights04/08/19 07:19 PM
2

A ‘diverse pool’ with another person exactly like her.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 12:13 PM
1

See, that’s the problem! It’s not enough that men have emotions but they need to announce those emotions to somebody else so that their emotions are properly confirmed as indeed ‘emotions’ and to what end? Men bond over activities not conversations. What hurts men isn’t their lack of emotional expression it’s the emotional isolation that they too often endure after their friendships drift apart from the time constraints of serious relationships and modern family life. Today’s men lose their free…
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:35 AM
1

The woman who expects to be your only source of sex and affection owes you sex and affection.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:54 AM
1

It doesn’t matter - SHE’S THE ADULT! She’s a big girl wearing her big girl pants and she’s expected to make big girl decisions.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:15 AM
1

Right because men don’t kick themselves the hardest above anyone else whenever they fail... Although the external rewards are beneficial to men’s well being their internal rewards for hard work are also important to them. Expressing emotions? Um... you need to read that again because they are talking about crying which is something men are less likely to do and that’s problematic for women who are known to cry over trivialities such as a bad work review or during a particularly intense workout. …
/r/MensRights25/07/19 02:06 PM
2

Men are being appreciated under the above terms because they exhibit a femininity very few men are able to achieve and you don’t think that’s bullshit? The very notion that men want to cry is absurd! Crying is an uncontrollable emotional response to a stimuli so the lack of male tears isn’t in response to peer pressure or a man’s personal inhuman ability to control an uncontrollable emotion - it’s just not in their nature to cry over trivialities such as frustration or failure. The above sentime…
/r/MensRights25/07/19 01:10 PM
3

Women are a gender and feminism is a series of sacred pseudo philosophies but don’t let that ruin your conflating women with feminism as if they are the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:27 AM
2

Women of colour might have to be more selective with who the damsel for but let us not pretend that being a damsel in distress isn’t an aspect of all of their individual cultures...
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:09 AM
4

Ah yes, the old school feminist of the ‘choice feminism’ brand who gave zero thought to the fact that in a binary system giving one group all of the choices means that the other group doesn’t get any. If you just put one tiny bit of thought into what you were doing in your old school you would of realized that women’s liberation meant men can never be liberated from their roles because somebody has to take out the garbage or work themselves to death and that sure as shit isn’t going to be the on…
/r/MensRights25/07/19 04:27 AM
18

Notice that the woman's violent act is entirely diminished but the man’s violent act is not just compared to murder but ‘very often’ murder.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 04:06 AM
-1

Yes, because men secretly want to be women, right? No, femininity is not the ambition nor the inherent qualities or attributes of most men. Men are masculine not because they are expected to be but because they just are and there’s nothing wrong with that. The largest cohort of men are inherently masculine and to pretend that they aren’t is cruel. Yes, there are outliers who are more like the men reflected in the sentiment above but they are not the vast majority and yes it’s cruel to enforce ty…
/r/MensRights25/07/19 03:43 AM
2

When I was in college one of my courses had us complete an English IQ test which comprised of English currency, English weights, and common English verbiage of which any English person had an average score of 100, of course we weren’t English, so it was a disaster for any student who didn’t know anything about stone, quids, and petrol which was almost the entire class. Consider that! A class of college educated technical students were reduced to the level of imbeciles on paper in less than an ho…
/r/MensRights24/07/19 08:02 AM
3

Girls are sheep? Vote for sheep in the next election. We need more sheep on the police force. There’s a disturbing lack of sheep in today’s boardrooms. Management should spend time boosting the career of sheep. But... when it comes time to blame somebody for the mess women are in they won’t look at the benevolent sexism that promotes women as docile and well behaved - they’ll blame the odd man out and call it patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 07:45 AM
4

Close the lid not just the seat and everybody wins. With the swirl of the dirty water when you flush some particles escape into the air around the toilet and if the lid is closed it’s more likely to be contained within the toilet.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 12:24 PM
1

Take your logical reasoning back to your chess club where it belongs this is a shopping mall where emotional reasoning rules supreme!
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:18 PM
2

He believes in the same brand of lies that support any supremacy movement without any reasoning towards the value of those lies. Saying women are superior to men is a bold statement but the question isn’t whether or not women are superior to men it’s whether the person in front of you is more superior than the person next to them, male or female, and that’s the main flaw to supremacy movements they don’t take anything other than a physical demographic into account so we are left to believe that …
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:09 PM
4

Parent (noun) - : a person who brings up and cares for another
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:12 AM
2

What’s her current GPA and is it from a trustworthy source?
/r/MensRights19/07/19 02:41 AM
6

The article pretends that the manoshere is a unified group and not different groups with different ideas who, for the most part, dislike the others ideas.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 08:44 AM
4

Nope, you are just a dishonest asshole rationalizing your shitty behaviour with wet brain farts.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 09:17 PM
1

That design doesn’t solve the reason why men spread their legs it simply forces them not to. A proper chair would allow men to keep their legs closer together and stabilize their stability pyramid/triangle.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 01:20 PM
2

Was she banned for having an independent thought?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:42 PM
3

My wife has twice the number of conditions on that list for herself than I have for her and I suspect most men and women feel the same.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:35 PM
1

Racism is a hierarchal comparison between races but their version of racism allows them to bully or silence people in power. In my area the government decided to incentivize people of colour before an election because they desperately needed the votes and apparently the POC needed an infusion of tax dollars to prevent them from committing every racist stereotype you can conceive about people of colour. The article read like what I would expect from the worst neo-nazi website but it was my govern…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 10:30 PM
16

Those aren’t knights those are goons. What’s most important to note from that video is that the proMRA woman is taking direct action and the woman who opposes men’s rights is using three men as her agents to get her out of the mess she put herself in - hell, for a minute there, she’s doing nothing more than her best impression of a tree or lamp post.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:37 PM
19

Why does that title give me the impression that the picture is of Fred Lane? That is definitely not Fred Lane.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 02:35 AM
1

It’s a bit of a misfire though because it reads as more of a complaint against the advice women receive rather their belief that any of it is necessary. The idea that it’s not their fault that they are sexist because they were conditioned to be excuses the behaviour and creates sympathy for almost all of histories greatest villains.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 02:25 AM
4

Just because my kids are under 8 and very few people want to watch them play is apparently no excuse to deny them the equivalent payment of a soccer professional? The highest paid player makes 111 million so by my calculations my family is due 222,000,225.72, the 225.72 being a refund on the payments that I made to have them play, where should I pick up my cheque? Also, my kid was in a school play and a choir performance while the other one likes to paint. Where should I pick up my Will Smith, B…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:45 PM
4

They attack the victim of prejudice rather than the offenders.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:05 PM
3

More than a game that has a one year old following rules, vocally expressing an opinion, and giving and receiving affection all of which will advance her milestones far more than damage her with whatever bizarre fantasy conspiracy those two adult women have cooked up? P
/r/MensRights04/07/19 02:47 PM
10

At the end of the day don’t we all just work for the affection of the people we love?
/r/MensRights04/07/19 01:06 PM
8

The funny thing about MRAs is that many MRAs initially came here to ‘set those silly MRAs straight on a few things’.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 05:23 AM
2

A guy at work was busted by some coworkers buying sex and with the cat out of the bag he gave candid answers to questions asked and we learned that the prostitute earned in one hour what he made in 13 hours of back breaking labour and she had complete control over the entire encounter from bringing to end. Before hearing his experience I was under the impression that women who sold sex were exploited but now I think the other person is also exploited. Prostitutes use people who want sex to obtai…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 05:15 AM
199

They will demand to also shit in the streets suspecting that it’s an empowering privilege and oppression tool against women. I have to waste time looking for a bathroom but men can just shit wherever they want! the patriarchy is forcing women to be dignified and proper by only permitting men to shit in dark corners! we demand the right to shit in public spaces just like men! equality means that men should be burdened with shitting in bathrooms not women! it’s misogyny to believe that only women’…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 11:03 PM
3

Are you really going to blame a six year old for acting like a six year old doing something adult because he overheard a conversation above his age? As a father I can tell you that he doesn’t give a shit about girl’s bums himself but he knows that there’s a backstory about them and cameras so he took great joy in being a pest not knowing the full extent of what he was doing or any of the sexual implication of his actions. Perhaps this will put it into perspective for you... would you really shou…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 08:29 PM
0

If you are a man there is a mandate placed on you to never strike a woman even in self defence, whether you want to admit it or not and whether you like it or not, it’s there and it’s enforced by the entirety of the current establishment. What is your proposal to keep those men free from both relying on self defence and free from harm because both of those paths amount to the same thing? About the name calling: unreasonable, a joke, and petty are all ideas that you’ve used in defence of your pos…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:00 PM
4

It has very little to do with social pressure except that social pressure is a contrivance used to explain the ‘baffling behaviour’ of a woman who’d rather not work herself to death in a job she hates. It baffles them but not any of us who’s job is a means to an end who play the lottery and make retirement payments to retire to the life of a housewife. Remember that man who won the lottery and promptly retired from his job but his wife who worked as a cashier at Walmart kept hers? Me neither but…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:17 PM
3

At our school we’re more comfortable violating basic human rights than confronting the ‘problem’ children.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:34 PM
0

My female friends and family all think that? Golly! Thanks for the eye opener - I’ll never look at them the same... Having lived among women for my entire life I thought the ones in my life were as far removed from insane raving idiots who can’t be trusted with rudimentary tasks as myself but thanks to this tweet and your keen observation of women’s true feelings about men I now know that their history of total sanity over half a century is simply a decades long ruse to support a crazy game only…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:21 PM
0

Do you have a counterpoint to make? Do you disagree with the notion that when you deny people the right to defend themselves you are then obligated to defend them? How do you propose to defend men against violence in absentia except by taking their plight with dead seriousness? With lots of name calling? That seems to be your solution to conflict resolution, no?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:12 PM
1

Normally I agree with you, however, we have a solemn responsibility to protect men from the violence of women if we insist men can’t protect themselves and part of that means these jokes are off the table.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 01:45 PM
7

Note that the women who change their behaviour because of negative stereotypes about men being rapists aren’t as often criticized or ridiculed for their prejudice, in fact, quite the opposite they are supported and their sexist prejudice is socially applauded.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 01:20 PM
2

It would seem that they changed the article’s name to : let it all sweat out. The article is mostly an attack on antiperspirants with the writer trialing deodorants and navel gazing about not using anything at all because apparently a journalist who writes fluff pieces about blaming the patriarchy for trivialities doesn’t sweat very much in her climate controlled environment while pushing buttons on a keyboard. Edit: sorry I forgot to add - the fake problem being the horror for women of sweat st…
/r/MensRights30/06/19 04:55 PM
2

Or male metrics are added to support female causes, so, 85% of homeless people are male suddenly becomes 14,000 people are homeless and many of them are women so we need women’s specific homeless shelters.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 04:32 PM
13

The first modern commercial deodorant was invented by a Edna Murphey and then improved by Helen Barnett. Edna? Helen? Patriarchy...? If they spent half as much time learning as they did making up bullshit most of their problems would go away on their own.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 11:59 AM
26

According to the cdc in 2016 45,000 people committed suicide. Of that, 84% were male. Of that, 42% had known relationship problems. That’s 308 men a week. To claim that roughly 7% of those 308 men killed themselves over a failure to access their beloved children is reasonable to me and I would expect it to be much higher than that but you are correct that without knowing more variables it’s wrong to use rough estimates as hard facts.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 12:45 PM
3

If what you claim is true why is every trait you list the ideal form of manliness still to this day? Man are still loyal to their employer and even sign their name to codes that define proper conduct as an employee - the employee code of conduct. That’s simply modern workplace dignity and respect policies that once again men put their name to. Hardness - that’s survived untouched without any alteration over the centuries. That business code of conduct I mentioned above specifically outlines corr…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 04:50 AM
2

Your ‘war’ isn’t between men and women but the lies people believe to be true.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 03:25 AM
30

The average male penis is 3.5 inches or 8.8 cm flaccid and that looks to be about that so I guess it’s all anal sex and blowjobs for him, right?
/r/MensRights27/06/19 03:03 AM
1

Our ability to cope with our emotions without a physical breakdown facilitates our utility to those who can’t. We still experience the emotions, we aren’t robots, but we are able to function effectively while experiencing them.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 02:41 AM
2

It’s not lip service. Follow me down the rabbit hole: If gender is a social construct as feminism asserts they need to reconcile it with women’s failure to exhibit their emotions like men - they need to explain why men and women seem to be naturally inclined to exhibit emotions in different ways and since most emotions are largely uncontrollable such as crying - they need to explain why it’s normal for woman to cry during what many men would consider a triviality... they can’t, so they declare t…
/r/MensRights27/06/19 01:47 AM
4

Men’s rights spells an end to benevolent sexism and a significant loss of women’s power of influence over men. Imagine if men were liberated from all roles except the ones they choose for themselves and women had no authorities to appeal to or emotional arguments or shaming tactics to make... Women lose almost every gain they made with their liberation and they are left fighting for individual gender roles with men who don’t acknowledge women as women but simply men without the penis.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 01:01 AM
3

Wait a minute! Men who didn’t even own their own skin and were subject to the whims of their master or lord had historical access to wealth and property? Perhaps it’s time to accept that most men and women historically didn’t have a vote and didn’t own property and needed permission to do everything and stop acting like those issues were exclusively a female problem.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 12:33 AM
1

I despise using using demographic statistics to prove, justify, or rationalize any social problem because it doesn’t do justice for the vast majority of entirely innocent individuals within that demographic, but if I was inclined to be that person, like this person is: I would note that racial demographics in the USA combined with police reports of sexual assault by the perpetrator’s race means that white people are not committing their proportional share of sexual violence. Of course, that’s al…
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:42 PM
6

“Man is trash and those who are not, are exceptions,” She has that backwards but she’d have to make note of the men who aren’t intruding into her life to see it.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 11:35 AM
2

Gamergate in 2014 exposed gamers to SJW bullshit and for a while their subreddit was nearly indistinguishable to mensrights.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 09:00 AM
2

Black-men, not black people, black men, so you don’t have to replace men with black - it’s already in there.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:54 AM
1

I love how these people believe that one person is just as good as another so it doesn’t matter who the person is so they can just toss anybody in that role and lol whatever! It’s only important things like sports that they think that merit and mastery are important.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 10:37 AM
2

What rewards does society promote that will encourage men to mature in your terms of that definition? I think you’ll also find that those same people promote early marriage as a liability for young women and babies as a ball and chain around a young woman’s leg. This setup creates a delay that promotes premarital sex until the career focused woman suddenly gets punched in the face by her biological clock and she needs to find a suitable mate among already established men who are reluctant to sur…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 10:24 AM
-1

By white you mean anglo saxons and anglo saxons were dominant in the last few centuries due to their history and location which gave them advantages that other cultures didn’t have. Edit: I have more time to elaborate on my point. After the Norman conquest of Britain Art and governance was in French, religion was in Latin, and math and science was Greek this allowed them to perceive other cultures as valuable beyond their own culture and ways of doing things - it made them culturally adaptive. T…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 09:00 AM
1

We are not heckled by the people who matter most to us and we don’t much care what strangers think.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:26 PM
1

That depends on where you live. I believe there was a story out of Utah (I think) a few years ago that reported a woman had abandoned the baby to the father for a few months and then decide to put the baby up for adoption rather than pay child support to the father.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:23 PM
2

She joined a group that bonds over hating and fearing people who are different than her fuelled by rampant prejudice and an unquestioned in-group bias. It’s as ridiculous as asking black folk during black history month to take a moment and listen to neo-nazis.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:14 PM
2

What’s this ‘variety’ you keep talking about? As if there’s ever been a female hero whose ever been remarkably unmanly?
/r/MensRights17/06/19 10:24 PM
5

I wonder why you are telling me to fix my own problem and not use my power of influence to make changes? Lol too funny! Can you guess why those behaviours are called feminine but not masculine? The largest cohort of people exhibiting those behaviours are women and within that gender those feminine women are a supermajority to the point that I would be surprised if you knew a woman who exhibited anywhere near the average man’s level of masculinity much less one who wanted to be a man in a healthy…
/r/MensRights17/06/19 08:03 PM
1

If you knew what a pyrrhic victory was you’d know your mother was right.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 04:56 PM
127

Women and men should be valued partners without debt.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 04:53 PM
20

They are treated like men treat other men and it says a lot that she wants men to not treat her that way.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 04:49 PM
9

What good is that if the superhero they are watching is just a man with boobs? Women have tendencies that are not often seen in action movies: Women tend to lead from behind. Women tend to seek consensus before taking action. Women tend to physically express the emotions they are feeling. Women tend to tend and befriend others in a time of crisis. Women’s traditional power comes from their influence over others. Women can get the guys without enduring a massive physical hardship to prove their v…
/r/MensRights17/06/19 04:45 PM
2

A woman expecting a man to pay her bill is nothing new.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:40 PM
5

‘Men are stronger than women’ - what good does that do a man? He can’t defend himself without without suffering a pyrrhic level of collateral damage. That’s what’s most annoying about people who think like this - on one hand they demand that men can’t hurt women but then shirk their obligation to protect those men with bullshit remarks about men’s physical prowess. It’s really simple - if you take the power away from people to protect themselves then you must adopt the role of protecting them an…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:31 PM
1

What if I told you that it had less to do with body mutilation and more to do with stemming the spread of a religious culture that appeals more to third world tribespeople than the dominant western religious culture? They are poisoning the militant cool aid before people drink from it.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:11 PM
1

Not always - it depends on the woman and the sexuality of the man. This is not a man only thing either if that’s what somebody is insinuating because women also peep at men depending on their sexuality and the man. The demand of the person who made this for obedience to the culture of the descendants of puritan pioneers is the real story being pushed in that pic. All of us must pretend to be frigid god fearing pioneers so that a minority of influential women can feel comfortable in mixed communi…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 06:54 PM
0

So their computer algorithm is pretty good but it still needs work?
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:52 AM
1

I agree and I apply that same principal to men which is why I’m here. Both women and men should not be on the hook to carry costs they can’t afford because they decided to have sex but didn’t decide to be a parent.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:45 AM
5

Men take risks and are more dependant on money than women who have the option to be dependent on men.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 12:11 PM
1

Women tend to seek out a mate who can provide physical comfort for her and her children. That means a man who can provide physical security, material wealth, and healthiness. Ideally a woman desires all three but failing that she’ll settle for a partner who can exhibit her most dire need for her environment and she’ll make her decision among the best of the men who she can attract by exhibiting the chief desire of men in her area at that time. In a tough neighbourhood it wouldn’t surprise me tha…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 05:02 AM
1

That certainly adds to the list of things that people thought certain people shouldn’t do because of prejudice fears.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 04:21 AM
7

The players in the CFL don’t make anywhere near the amount NFL players make and everybody seems to understand why but when it comes to women’s leagues people start losing their minds.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 08:44 AM
6

Does the child need support? A man two doors up from me died leaving his wife and kids behind - there’s no child support going to her and yet she’s kept her kids despite their ‘need’ for additional money coming from their father. All unexpected pregnancies are accidents - why is this one any different? People decide to have sex they don’t often decide to have a baby so when a baby occurs a second decision by both people who had sex needs to be made. We accept that the lady gets first choice but …
/r/MensRights08/06/19 03:02 PM
8

He chose to have sex, not to have a baby, so he shouldn’t be on the hook for nearly two decades paying for something he didn’t want.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 02:25 PM
3

I think you’ll find that research surrounding child grooms is so scant that it’s completely unreliable and I think you’ll also find that 12 year old girls are being married to 15 year old men, furthermore, I think you’ll find that the prevailing attitude of the child bride advocates to be that the girl is a victim but her child husband is lucky to have her so no one documents his ‘good fortune’ only her misfortune.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 07:06 AM
4

They are mostly married to the young teenaged brides everybody is having a fit over and it’s usually a decision made by both mom and dad in an arranged marriage but we are lead to believe that it’s just a symbol of women’s oppression.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 05:06 AM
17

Today’s anarchists have rules and leaders who exercise their authority to enforce those rules over you and the Anti-fascists demand that everybody obey their social regimentation without question or else.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 06:13 PM
3

Is it okay if men still consider themselves men despite their lack of personal military histories?
/r/MensRights06/06/19 04:19 PM
1

The men who take parental leave view work like me - work is a means to an end not an aspect of our identity or a path to self fulfillment.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:29 AM
1

If the men and woman defended themselves would these ladies still be bragging and laughing about it or would it be remembered as that time they were abused?
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:08 AM
13

A debate is not meant to sway the opinion of your opponent - it’s meant to sway the opinions of the observers to the debate.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:13 PM
2

Feminism is the adherence to a philosophy that tells us that when the king left the room, his wife the queen, took orders from any peasant with a penis.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:03 PM
4

Masculinity isn’t toxic or positive depending on how it’s perceived- it’s just masculinity. I can spin that photo into something toxic just as easily as OP has made it something positive. The problem is in the lie that masculinity is tied to negative and positive traits not the total sums of positive or negative traits.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 08:55 AM
13

That doesn’t excuse her reaction though. ‘That’s also terrible’ or something similar would be the expected reaction of a person who thought it was terrible or something similar.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 11:51 AM
1

Fire the police since they serve no purpose if we aren’t giving presumed innocent people access to defense council or harassing their defence council. Let’s just get together as a mob and deal with these ‘criminal’ jerks ourselves and these academics can pretend that it’s not going to come back and bite them in the ass. Mediocre intellectuals always do so well during purges don’t they?
/r/MensRights02/06/19 11:39 AM
1

Friendship. The same as racist people; they bond over their dislike of ‘others’.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 08:46 AM
2

You have to use ‘man years’ they are like dog years but they apply to human males and when it comes to life experience. When a 30 year old woman ‘has sex’ with an underage boy ‘man years’ is at work. When an underage boy ‘has sex’ with an adult woman and it results in a child, ‘man years’ applied means that he must pay child support. From my calculations one year of male human experience is worth slightly more than 2 years of female human experience so a thirteen year old boy is the experience e…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 07:15 PM
3

There are no sides because men and women are partners - my natural desires and inclinations play well with my wife’s natural desire and inclinations. Feminism lies to my wife that there are sides and that the grass is greener on my side. My wife has no desire to be a man but she’s told by feminism that her femininity is problematic while also telling her that the aspects of my masculinity that she can’t easily emulate is problematic. Feminism tells us that men have had all the power historically…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 11:15 AM
1

When you picture a manly man — a guy who every guy wants to be — you’re often picturing someone pretty rugged. Nope, I’m seeing a family man and with that the writer’s obsolete skill list becomes relevant again.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 08:40 AM
8

Very few women are feminists and many of those who are grow out of it by the time they get a serious boyfriend and hear the other side of the story. Feminism is for old lesbians, young women, and careerists.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 08:39 AM
10

From what I understand there are options to having that removed from your arrest record, especially since it’s proven undeniably false. You might want to look into it - a certificate of innocence or something like that.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 12:01 AM
4

Men hate women so much that men have spent centuries systematically eliminating whatever women perceived as a discomfort - that’s not oppression- it’s the opposite of oppression. The object men’s hate is not the person they adorn in gold and jewels and fine clothes and a lavish lifestyle - it’s the person they hang from trees on the insistence that a woman has been wronged.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:43 PM
1

Unless you are an animal you should have no opinion on animal cruelty? Unless you are a murder victim you should have no opinions on murder? Unless you’re expected to go and fight in war you should have no say in federal politics? Unless you pay property tax and have kids in school you have no say in education spending? I’m pro-choice and male but don’t tell me that I have no opinion on when a baby is a person under the law and has the right to legal protections.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:18 PM
7

To Americans a female voice is perceived as more helpful, supportive, and trustworthy than a male voice but let’s not address that and instead suggest that being seen as more helpful, supportive, or trustworthy is actually a case of victimization.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 08:37 PM
27

To apply the Automated external defibrillator (AED) correctly a woman’s bra has to come off and since most people don’t know basic first aid much less advanced they’d interfere with the process. Here’s an article about a fear of touching women over explaining the multiple symptoms of a female cardiac arrest or the first aid involved in resuscitating them which would help far more than a article fostering a moral panic.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:35 PM
1

That’s cute but unless you’re gay women are the ones who determine your sexual value. This principle works against the fat acceptance group too.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:20 AM
2

It’s a racist statement but it’s not a specifically hateful statement. Not all racism is hateful but all racism is irrelevant individually and that’s the distinction we should make.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 01:55 PM
3

Isn’t that the plot of the last Mad Max movie?
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:49 PM
4

Holy shit! There were 256 instances of domestic violence in Australia so far this year? Damn you Australians and your horribly domestically violent ways! Wait... All of Australia? Australia the nation of 25,054,034 people? Sorry Australians! The article really makes you look bad when in fact you’re doing fantastic not harming each other domestically...
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:37 PM
1

1960’s Democrats to Americans: vote for us and we’ll save you from black men who you don’t know. 2019’s Democrats to Americans: vote for us and we’ll save you from the white men who you don’t know.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:16 PM
1

Yep, every woman wants their lover to tell them that they are not a precious gem but a very un-special rock.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:07 PM
1

The man who gets a woman pregnant stands in front of a family court judge and is judged by a government endorsed institution. A man who has no family has a Peter Pan syndrome. A man who wants his girlfriend to have an abortion is judged abusive. Once again, a man who wanted sex but not a kid stands in front of a judge and is made to pay for his decision to have sex.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:27 AM
6

The harpers article overlooks the reason why modern men have no friends which is that too many modern women demand all of their partner’s excess time so give your men Sunday’s off or accept your role in their emotional isolation, but don’t you dare complain over the consequences of your emotional abuse. Men ‘expressing emotions’ is a misnomer - what they mean is men don’t physically cry and it’s a problem for the people who do, in other words, more men must cry because more women cry. Asking men…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:17 AM
5

As men we know that anger can too easily lead to physical violence and there’s absolutely no winning strategy to stop the violence coming from a violent wife. It not even a case of mutual assured destruction - it’s simply an entire defeat on the side of the husband whether he participates or not. Who in their right mind would want to play a game where the only winning move is not to play?
/r/MensRights20/05/19 04:55 AM
1

Yes, that makes you a racist since you’re comparing two racial groups and claiming one to be superior at something despite individual merit which you acknowledged yourself when you said ‘unfairly applies a generalization against an individual’ and then detailed how people utilize racism to confirm their racial prejudice which was the content of your second paragraph. Racial prejudice and racism are merely superstition and superstitions can be overcome when your philosophies are governed by logic…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 04:04 AM
12

The ultra right also expects men to take responsibility for any children born when all men wanted was sex so I’m not sure what you’re thinking. The pro-life camp is not as marginal or fringe or ultra-right or even male as the media would have you believe. It’s appalling that these omissions are made during what should be honest debate about abortion and it’s leading to harmful assumptions that have men bearing the brunt of people’s hate.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:49 PM
5

14% of Canada is not white/European. To put that in perspective: 13.9% of Canadians are ethnically Scottish. There’s as many Scots in Canada as there are non-whites and it’s ridiculous to pretend that it’s a fifty-fifty split all around. Non-whites would need to have multiple careers simultaneously in order to fulfill the order of diversity that these folks are pushing. Not only is my black neighbour a professor, but he’s a doctor, a member of parliament, and a news anchorman at the same time bu…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 12:15 PM
1

The article makes the assertion that ‘it hurts us all’ in the title but doesn’t give us details in the article? So, it doesn’t hurt as much as the nypost would like to promote?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:12 AM
13

As a parent I’d be concerned that my five year old was still exploring the world by putting stuff in her mouth because that should of ended at three years old and I’d also be concerned that she could walk in silence pondering one thing for two minutes because that’s well above her age, but then what do I know about kids - I’m a dad!
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:06 AM
1

When I was a kid I got into a ‘fight’ with another kid. He was smaller than me but he was trained in the mysterious ways of martial arts. He did some sort of fancy kick that I’m sure he thought was going to send me flying 50 feet away and break all of my bones, instead, his foot bounced off of me and he was suddenly on the floor begging for me not to hurt him and that was the end of the fight. I bring this up for two reasons - the most obvious being that she’s maybe 110lbs in the rain taking dow…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 01:10 PM
6

That’ll teach boys the guilt of forging a lifestyle of comfort and security from an entirely hostile world for the direct benefit of women and children. Why do these people always seem like that person who doesn’t know that the bacon they love so much comes from the death of pigs? Bacon comes from the supermarket!
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:04 PM
4

That’s silly. This isn’t about men and women it’s about people’s views on whether or not an unborn child is a person under the law. If a pregnant woman is attacked and the baby dies is the crime murder or assault?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:22 PM
3

From the NYT: Although women hold only 22 of 140 seats in the Alabama Legislature — one of the smallest percentages in the country — they also held important roles in the abortion debate in Montgomery, the capital. A woman, Representative Terri Collins, was the primary sponsor of the new law, and Gov. Kay Ivey, the second woman ever to lead Alabama, signed the ban, calling it “a powerful testament to Alabamians’ deeply held belief that every life is precious and that every life is a sacred gift …
/r/MensRights17/05/19 11:45 AM
13

That’s some slippery shit isn’t it? How can a person be a racial bigot but not a racist? If you hold negative views of the people of a different race that you don’t have of your own - you’re a racist. You’ve placed your race above their race and that’s racism.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:55 PM
2

Or they are women who use men for provisions and will exploit any reason they can to default on their end of the bargain.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 08:50 AM
5

50% of the population who are pro-life says what I typed to both genders. The remaining only says it to men. Which means that it’s universally said to men and sometimes said to women. It half sucks for one gender and completely sucks for the other.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 05:41 PM
21

Nothing says femininity like threatening somebody with fisticuffs and extreme physical harm.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 05:30 PM
21

If you didn’t want the responsibility of parenthood you should of kept it in your pants This is something society only says to men.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:53 AM
3

If a middle aged woman stops having sex for political reasons will anybody really notice? /s
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:50 AM
11

And why women had to ‘fight’ for the right to vote.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 02:32 PM
1

No, they manipulate people with factual statistics. The statistical fact that white men are highly prominent in specific crimes is often exploited by the Americans with an agenda. Logic is the application of reason without emotion but your ‘survival logic’ looks a lot like fear. It must be very tiresome to be in a constant state of fight or flight around racists. Of course, you can’t specifically identify the mind of a person by their appearance so you have to suspect everybody who matches the d…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:36 PM
5

If you prevent a child from having access to their perfectly fine and entirely willing parent you are a child abuser.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:12 PM
-5

One of the best strategies to convert white racists who utilize statistics to justify their racism is to give examples where white people have excelled in criminal behaviours above ‘other’ people in America. The strategy is effective because it forces the white racist to consider other factors beyond mere race to explain the racial deficit and those other factors are also applicable to other crimes and other races. In the right hands the knowledge of racial statistics can be a powerful tool agai…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:36 AM
6

The latest Gillette ad around me has them resorting to firefighters as a olive branch.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:28 AM
2

An adult female recruited a non adult student to act as her agent - a female student no doubt!
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:09 AM
2

Married people are too often examined independently of each other in reports that guide policy and not as a cooperation, that is until tax time, and then suddenly my wife’s extreme poverty over the year doesn’t make her a victim - it makes her middle class.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:26 PM
3

I couldn’t watch it beyond a few seconds but that was enough to see that her show is called ‘full frontal’ so I doubt anything she comments about is to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 09:19 PM
2

I know that you are new at this but using statistics to justify or rationalize something is how people learn to obey and support racism to being with. People aren’t racist because they are just mean they are racist because statistically they feel that they are often justified. The injustice of racism isn’t found in with an unequal application of racism - it’s found in applying statistics and comparing two groups of peoples without any concern for other more important contributing factors.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 08:26 PM
1

The opinion of the members of your family don’t have any impact on you? How are you able to not care what your children think and how are you able to be so callous with any raw opinions you might have about them? As a dad my days are full of little white lies about my three year olds art projects. The truth is my kid is no Monet and my kid would probably never be if I compared the two as comparable artists at this point in life.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 07:59 PM
1

A party who appealed to racism to get elected is worse for black men than the other party who was appealing to sexism? Black men are still men but there are laws and systems in place that will enthusiastically protect people for being black which aren’t there for being male and you honestly expect that the most vulnerable men would come out any where near the top?
/r/MensRights06/05/19 07:52 PM
1

As a human your self-esteem is partially connected to the esteem other people have for you and vice versa. You can pretend that’s not the case but even your post above reads like you are a posturing peacock, no? You might not care about the esteem of strangers but your friends and loved ones certainly have an impact.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 09:07 AM
1

According to NPR in 2015, 14 years after the ‘study’ was conducted: Milwaukee County is divided along racial and political lines, and the city is the most segregated in America. Oh! Okay... I’m sure selecting the most segregated place in America for black people didn’t contribute negatively to that outcome one bit, right, and we can have faith that the 2001 Milwaukee study is indicative of America today from coast to coast. Wait a second... twenty years ago two black men got a call back for jobs…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 01:02 AM
9

A white kid with the same credentials will also be unlikely to find work. Yes, racism is a factor but it’s tied to other factors which are more crushing.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 08:55 AM
7

You need college to get a McJob these days because all of the other applicants have some college.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 08:47 AM
6

That’s weird! As I’ve been lead to believe rapists get high fives not hurt? Why would this woman think otherwise I wonder?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 08:40 AM
8

One female attendee claimed that when men are rejected by women, they are “most likely” to “respond violently,” due to the male gender’s assumption of dominance in society. The facilitators agreed with her description and moved on. Who would of thought that the folks who almost exclusively make the first move are people most likely to respond in any fashion to the answer?
/r/MensRights01/05/19 05:39 PM
2

That’s because it’s not an argument it’s an addendum to your point about women taken to include POC and minorities. The west was ideal under all circumstances even with it’s adherence to faulty political or scientific conclusions about ethnicity. Edit: the ‘fairly shifty’ was referring to the premise of the quote you made of the article and not anything you said, although, having reread it I can see your confusion.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 04:50 PM
0

Of course you’ll read my reply... you’ve established yourself to be overly concerned with upvotes and therefor other people’s opinions so you’ll obviously read this. Hahahaha! You logged in an alt account to give yourself an upvote! That’s truly sad - OMG, you really are already sad bastard! Hit the gym? You’re just full of great useless advice aren’t you? If only I had bigger muscles then I’d have... bigger muscles... Once again, I’m a father by choice, which to anybody with a brain means, that…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 02:15 PM
3

That entire premise is fairly shifty since, with the exception of the victims of the African slave trade, etc, western society is where people always voluntarily went to have an easier life. The ‘hell of a hard time’ they faced in the west was still superior to the life they left behind and that’s a perspective that we should never completely lose sight of. My wife’s ancestors escaped ethnic cleansing by moving here but she’s expected to be culturally offended about her surname being westernized…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 01:36 PM
2

30% of all Americans are white and male. If you added up ALL African Americans, Hispanic, and Indigenous Americans you get 30.3%. Sorry my Asian American friends I’m not intentionally leaving you out of this like journalists love to do all the time - but by adding your stats I would of went too far over the 30% and I wanted to get as close as I could to 30%. If they stopped pretending that the population diversity in the USA itself is equal there’d be significantly less ‘systemic’ racism.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 11:19 AM
0

Do you? Because saying ‘Focus on reaching your own potential, not funneling it into someone else.’ is an incredibly stupid thing to say to a father. Awe crap! You’ve been down voted again! Two downvotes in one day! It’s just not your week is it?
/r/MensRights01/05/19 10:51 AM
0

Only four down votes for criticizing the behaviour of people belonging to a movement within the subreddit of that movement? That’s a win you dummy. Edit: oh no! You got a downvote! Whatever will you do? Are you going to be okay? If I was you, with your feelings about voting, you should probably take the rest of the week off and try to recover from it.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 10:44 AM
2

Patriarchy is a system where women surrender their agency to men in the interests of being protected from discomfort. Racism is the bizarre belief that the human race is subdivided into hierarchal variations and the total sum of merits expressed by each member of a variation is somehow more important than a person’s individual merit. Slavery is the inability to express consent. White supremacy has the white variant of humans at the top of the racial hierarchy. That took 45 minutes?
/r/MensRights30/04/19 10:50 PM
2

Women are praised when they step out of their expected roles too.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 05:19 PM
3

Neither does she but with a few words she’s able to confirm the idea that men are dangerous to women and also confirm that men’s problems are trivial when compared with women’s problems.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 03:41 AM
1

They rejected the school”s authority over the dress code and then submitted to it’s authority with detentions? That’s absurd!
/r/MensRights27/04/19 02:48 AM
1

Then explain why divorce rates are, last I heard, at a 45 year low?
/r/MensRights27/04/19 02:13 AM
-3

Look an inanimate object has an offensive sexist slogan against men! Let’s be offensive sexist idiots against another demographic of people in response to it. The shirt’s offensive because of the sexism that it expresses against men - try not to lose that focus and attack women with additional sexism rather than the sexism on the shirt. Fighting sexism with additional sexism doesn’t solve the problem of sexism it just makes more victims.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 01:51 AM
0

Bitter? Have you ever seen the movie first blood? What did Rambo say happened to Delmar Barry who was the only other member of his team to survive Vietnam? ‘Got himself killed in Nam, didn’t even know it.’ That’s what I meant by you are already a sad bastard - you just don’t know it. Focus on my own potential instead of someone else...? Do you even know what fatherhood is?
/r/MensRights26/04/19 10:22 PM
13

There’s a anthropomorphic tree and raccoon in the film how much more diverse can you get? There’s literally black, white, green, pink and blue characters...
/r/MensRights26/04/19 09:29 PM
1

Do you really think that adults were at any time given the truth but then they chose to believed the lies? They weren’t delusional or jerks for the sake of being jerks - they simply believed a lie.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 08:47 PM
1

40 to 60 years is midlife? Another study of tv watching males aged 13 to 60 with a average of 48 years found that teenage males who watch tv suffer from arthritis, heart disease, and balding.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 04:11 AM
2

Thank goodness the evils of racism is drawing to a close so that black men can now be hated for being men instead of being black.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 03:51 AM
1

I’ll try this out one more time and then give up on this thread. There’s a reliable and effective path for men to follow which allows men to quickly and more easily access their own sense of self fulfillment and it starts with finding the right partner in life. A man’s full potential can only be reached when they experience more than just their most basic needs and for that it takes more than just themselves alone so there’s an exchange of what a man wants and needs and the social cost they have…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 03:09 AM
-3

Coaching somebody from birth to reach their full potential and achieve self-fulfillment will make you a sad bastard? You are already a sad bastard.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:15 PM
-5

The pinnacle of a man’s achievement is fatherhood and they couldn’t of done that without their spouses.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 08:53 AM
1

It should read ‘as his partner’ at the end and for most of us it’s completely true. Success don’t mean only economic prosperity there are many life successes that are more gratifying than work.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 08:51 AM
7

It’s an accurate assessment of a woman’s choices. The escalator is a very masculine blue but there’s no barrier preventing her from taking it. The stairs are a feminine pink and there’s nothing forcing her to take them. Her choices will usually tend towards pink because that’s her own personal inclination from which she gets internal rewards as well as external ones.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:04 AM
1

The choices are the same for men and women and those choices make all the difference. She could choose the escalator or the stairs so why are we being lead to believe that the stairs chose her?
/r/MensRights24/04/19 01:47 AM
3

What does your girlfriend want? If she wants you in the room and I don’t see why she wouldn’t you get in that room. Be polite and respectful but don’t leave the room. ‘I’ve done nothing wrong and I’m here for my girlfriend and I’m shocked that this hospital is supporting discrimination against me.’ Then ask her for her name. That should be the end of it.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 10:06 PM
1

No you don’t need proof to believe a rape victim but you need proof of the accusation to send a person to prison for the crime of rape.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 09:52 PM
9

To consider any mental health problem as a gendered issue is absurd.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 03:38 PM
3

Yes, and that dude at the end of the clip looks to be smelling it...
/r/MensRights21/04/19 11:06 AM
1

A baby crying loudly because he’s tired but he can’t fall to sleep because he’s crying loudly was definitely the most frustrating thing I’ve ever had to deal with in my life.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 10:10 AM
7

They are going to pretend that South Asian and East Asian people don’t exist to make their claim uncomfortable? White guys are a problem because they are too numerous in a country where whites make up 75% of the population? But an over-abundance of asians in tech aren’t a problem or a confirmation that the tech industry isn’t as bias as they’d like to pretend? They can’t even take a pure white man photo for their supposed anti-racism article for fuck sake - I count at least three South Asians! W…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:13 AM
7

I thought the same thing until I worked security and apparently it means ‘observe and report’ not ‘protect and serve’ and the agency I worked for was very clear on that distinction. Under no circumstances was I to use any measure of violence in my daily tasks.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 02:01 AM
1

Maybe she should embrace her own sexuality and a small measure of courage and ask a guy out? It goes to show you just how fucking worthless feminists actually are when they can’t press apex males to exert power on their behalf. A famous and attractive middle aged millionaire in the year 2019 who once stated ‘I’m proud to be a f*cking feminist’ or ‘being a feminist is a good thing’ I s unable to muster up enough personal courage to announce her own sexual attraction to a potential lover but we’re…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:50 AM
2

A boy is being raised as a girl because of a decision he made at three years old and you don’t see why people interested in the rights of males should take issue with it?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 03:36 PM
1

And bigger hands. You forgot the bigger hands and now that I pointed it out that’s probably all you can see.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 11:56 AM
0

He shouldn’t pay child support under any circumstances if he doesn’t want to be a father.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 11:44 AM
40

Being a known rapist around men is a good way to get a punch in the face and being a rape victim around women is a good way to get emotional support. That fool seems to be under the impression that rape has men one one side congratulating each other for it and women on the other in misery - rape culture.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 09:03 AM
2

Yes, they’re not inherently male or female behaviours but they are defined as masculine and feminine of which the biggest cohorts are male for masculinity and female for femininity. Even ‘feminine’ men are still more masculine than ‘masculine’ women and the same applies to women. A feminine man can never achieve the total femininity of a woman inherently - an extra effort must be made. Feminists have to reconcile their failure to achieve full masculinity with their belief that gender is a social…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:24 PM
21

It’s supppsed to be meninism which is meant to mock feminism but posting it to men’s rights without marking it as such just mocks men’s rights. A group of people with a negative image like MRAs should probably highlight this type of stuff as a satire of feminism so that visitors don’t get confused between meninism and men’s rights like you were.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:03 PM
7

That’s a lot of words to explain to us that in her opinion women are dumb.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 08:43 AM
5

McGraw’s updated version of “separate but equal” for the sexes illustrates the philosophy behind her views: The “progressive” emphasis on “inclusion” and “diversity” actually encourages bigotry and retribution. It is not designed to fight bigotry but to redirect it against supposedly “privileged” groups—in this case, men. It represents the ultimate in identity politics.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 12:41 PM
2

He’d have to be disinterested in his role as a father for that one sided perspective to make sense.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 02:46 PM
1

...by pretending that she’s a man with children for a day.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 02:34 PM
3

It’s a reaction not to toxic masculinity, but feminism’s bigotry against men. They choose common human behaviours and declare them as both toxic and entirely masculine. Technically that being posted here in the MRA subreddit is a bit of a misfire since it’s more a meninist post than men’s rights with meninism being a satire of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:10 PM
4

Educated and professional adults have decided that presenting a 33 year old woman as the subordinate to a 13 year old boy is defendable? My wife, also an educated person, is under the impression that her and I are equal but according to these people I’ve got two and a half times her age experience. I guess we’ll call it gender years? Kinda like ‘dog years’ but for gender? Take your age as a male and multiply it by 2.5 and that’s your gender age!
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:16 AM
4

On the days that I work my daily fitness tracking watch numbers crush my wife’s numbers but on days that I’m off she unsurprisingly edges me out. Although I had explained my job to her before we started wearing the watches she still pushed me to do things around the house after work, but after seeing my numbers she’s entirely stopped and so have the discussions about me doing additional housework.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 09:17 AM
3

They are the face of PTSD because it was initially called ‘shell shock’.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:15 AM
1

I take it that you could easily turn it on and off? She was probably feeling physically inadequate because she couldn’t turn on a vacuum cleaner, a very simple thing, any adult should be able to turn off a vacuum cleaner - but she couldn’t. So what is she if she’s not an adult and what are you? That’s a bit of a problem isn’t it? How’s a strong independent women supposed to be strong and independent when she’s foiled by a vacuum cleaner? Who’s to blame? You for one (sorry!) since you’re the one …
/r/MensRights10/04/19 07:29 AM
13

No, banning it is disrespectful to fathers and their children. Respect is a two way street and these fools ask for a respect that they are not willing to give others? Respect me and my kids and our celebration of our relationship.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 12:03 AM
2

What does any of that have to do with women being scorned or rejected? I grew up with racist assholes and not once did I suspect that were anything other than deceived people who had bought into a lie and that same thing is being played out here. Nope, they aren’t scorned or rejected they just believe the lies they’ve been taught.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 08:05 PM
5

What? Pilots just fly around with expensive bombs dropping them on whatever they want? Here I thought bombing was always part of a strategic plan and ordered by superiors because that bombed thing might be a part of a bigger plan and just having pilots bomb just any old thing might mess up military plans, but it turns out that generals make their plans by what ever pilots decide in real time.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 07:26 PM
29

Rules are for thee, but not for me.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 07:06 PM
1

Those are often the upsides but there’s also a down side to everything you posted that you aren’t addressing and the same goes for men - there’s ups and downs to being a man. We’ll call it a trade off between genders that feminism goes a long way to ignore that MRAs shouldn’t choose to also ignore unless the goal is meninism.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 01:15 PM
2

The younger her ‘settled’ for work in a safe, sanitary environment, with indoor air conditioning and without physical labour because of a sign... she’d quit her job tomorrow and join them in their physically demanding, unsanitary, outdoor, and high potential for injury job if only that sign was gender neutral...
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:58 PM
0

My facts are defined within the context of a documented history of the United States of America brought to me by reading the correspondences between the founding fathers, books on US history with citations, political documents written at the time, and newspapers from the period. As John Adams said, yes, the same John Adams I mentioned above, who promoted larger federal powers, wrote: Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, the…
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:11 PM
3

Research and data like that suggests that junior high school causes puberty, just saying...
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:02 PM
0

Men mostly voted for FDR with his new deal and the end of prohibition and women mostly voted for Hoover who supported prohibition. The Federalist Party was the beginning of pro-administration government for the USA lead by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams the second president of the USA. Jefferson, the third president, preferred a limited federal government and states rights. Federal taxation started because federal funding was at the whim of the states and the nation couldn’t reliably support …
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:00 PM
-1

Although women were prohibited from fighting they still enlisted as nurses and worked in factories handling dangerous chemicals involved in munition making. Women became a majority electorate in 1964 which was long after the establishment of welfare. most men were and are married to a woman and joint filed with their wives even if their wives made zero income - family income should be the benchmark of income tax not individual income. the children of dead soldiers who died defending their countr…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 11:04 PM
3

It is so long as there’s a distinction between how they treat men and women but not so much a distinction when it comes to justice. Personally, I think distinctive separate laws should be removed and the distinctions should be made during sentencing. A wife beating her husband should get the same charge as a random stranger would get with a beating but the specifics of the crime and it’s impact should be considered during the sentencing.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 10:00 PM
1

They didn’t control 56% in 1932 when the new deal was dangled in front of America and from what I recall men backed FDR and women backed Hoover. Unemployed men during the depression voted for a social safety net and with good reason but it was the women who didn’t care about a welfare state so long as America maintained prohibition that were actually to blame? Taxes are mostly paid by couples not single men and that’s a distinction that isn’t reflected when comparing the total sum of taxes paid …
/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:51 PM
1

Why? Most countries have a system of representative democracy not direct democracy which means voter power is channeled thru a representative and not controlled by the voters themselves.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:41 PM
1

I make a little bit more than twice the average family income for my country but my wife makes zero dollars. Do I get two votes or is okay for her to get one of my votes because her support facilitates my earnings and without it I’d make a lot less?
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:37 PM
5

That’s the most anti-MRA thing I’ve ever read and I’ve read some fairly toxic stuff about MRAs. I thought MRAs supported men seeking help for their problems which will result in men drawing more tax dollars but apparently our stoicism makes us better than the others? I thought MRAs were against child support for men who didn’t want to be fathers which will result in more women using social programs? I thought MRAs supported universal suffrage? I thought MRAs supported women serving in military c…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:28 PM
5

Even if there’s not a specific law for domestic violence isn’t it still a criminal act?
/r/MensRights02/04/19 07:20 PM
1

All men resign from jobs... women most affected. Fixed.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 11:59 PM
2

Male gay sex is more likely to spread sti/std so they were a significant target throughout history which carried on up until the 1980s when AIDS was also called GRID (Gay-related immune deficiency). There’s a lot of prejudice built up over centuries to overcome and the community is sometimes their own worst enemy for a speedy reconciliation.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:43 PM
2

Historically, women were often kept home through legal and social rules, or required to have a male companion in public. And these days cities are significantly safer for everybody and women are simply kept home thru their own fears... Makes you wonder just who created the need for male guardians, protective social rules, and custodial legalities doesn’t it? Women don’t want to live in a city they want a city sized cage so they can feel safe inside of it.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 07:56 AM
1

Neither. Men are being far too nice and agreeable for theirs and women’s own good and women are getting away with pretences that they wouldn’t of 30 years ago.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 12:10 PM
2

Gay men are still cool tho right? If you’re going to ban a group of people from an incredibly slim chance at seeing exposed genitals shouldn’t you go by sexual orientation more than gender identity? Or, maybe, it really doesn’t matter as much as we’d all like to pretend it does because, if we have a problem with different people in the toilet with us - it’s our problem to deal with not theirs - so we should be expected to deal with it and not them because they are innocent unless they’ve proven …
/r/MensRights29/03/19 03:41 AM
1

In October of last year dimethandrolone undecanoate (DMAU) also passed phase 1.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 02:59 AM
6

They were arrested and tried for their crimes and served their sentences when they were convicted. Edit: in other words, the male rappers, didn’t ‘get away with it’.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 02:24 AM
1

I’m curious as to how your ‘too frequent’ would be determined? If I step outside my house and receive a whistle how’s the next whistler going to know my whistle quota has been reached?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 01:52 AM
2

It says obligations are extinguished.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 01:35 AM
2

Exposed behind a babies head? There’s more obscurity between a breastfeeding mom’s boobs than any normal article of clothes so if you want to sneak a peek at a breastfeeding boob you’ll need to rapidly work more multiple angles than a normal neck could handle... Not a feminist, but I am a dad and I know how important it is to feed a hungry baby whenever and how often baby wants. Refer to my ass for your logic - I’m sitting down in front of my kids! My kids are in the room and can see me using my…
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:04 PM
1

From what I remember it’s legal to feed in public in all states so when you say the USA... I have no idea what this has to do with men’s rights since a lot of us are loving fathers who want the best for our children, and with that in mind we know that you can’t beat fresh breastmilk.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:40 PM
1

If you can establish that it’s entirely not sexual and that it’s her principal sustenance then go ahead and feed her, but that’s not the case is it? Hell, I’d be surprised if she enjoyed the taste of it no matter what she’s told you...
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:35 PM
1

Great point! They have lots of free time to get these programs up and running don’t they? Can you direct me to the latest news article implying that this is typical of women and that women need to learn consent so that they aren’t prone to engage in this behaviour?
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:13 PM
3

A woman feed her baby as if it’s a natural thing to do and not a disgusting perversion? That’s terrible! We need to stop hungry babies from being feed the most nutritious meal they can possibly have immediately! When will society learn that breasts are not for feeding hungry babies - they are for tricking men into thinking they’ll be able to provide ample milk for any future children not actually supplying milk to those children! Damn it - what’s next? Men using their asses to sit on? Men’s asse…
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:05 PM
69

Where’s the ‘consent police’ to lecture women everywhere about consent while they pretend this behaviour is typical of females? Oh... they’re too busy applauding her... I see...
/r/MensRights27/03/19 09:54 PM
2

The original twilight zone has us question America’s most popular morals and values so how good will one be when it’s made by people who are unable to accept the slightest criticism or disagreement?
/r/MensRights26/03/19 11:14 PM
74

Scaled down lord of the flies is about human conflicts between the things we want and the cost of those things that we must pay. The stranded boys initially wanted to create a civilization but because they were boys they couldn’t pay the cost of civilization which is civility towards each other as they each found their individual places within the community. Bullying would be more accurate a word than violence although physical violence is the preferred method for boy bullying while girls prefer…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:06 PM
198

The actual quote after he wrote Lord of the Flies’: Girls say to me, very reasonably, ‘why isn’t it a bunch of girls? Why did you write this about a bunch of boys?’ Well, my reply is I was once a little boy — I have been a brother, a father, I am going to be a grandfather. I have never been a sister, or a mother, or a grandmother. That’s one answer. Another answer is of course to say that if you, as it were, scaled down human beings, scaled down society, if you land with a group of little boys, …
/r/MensRights25/03/19 02:01 PM
2

I get downvoted here for egalitarian ideas, so don’t point fingers.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 11:30 AM
1

Stupid is defined as ‘having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.’ The authorities who’re familiar with the entire situation have made the decision not to persue charges. Are they stupid? That decision has been applauded by multiple friends and strangers who’re not involved with the case but who’ve informed themselves about the case. Are they stupid? I’ve sided with the local prosecutors, the local public, the local parishioners, her family, reporters, and most social comment…
/r/MensRights24/03/19 09:41 PM
16

Women have a natural tendency to seek out and give emotional support to each other during a crisis and men have a natural tendency to adopt a provider role. By playing a victim in constant crisis feminists corner the market on support and access direct power from powerful men. Powerless men are then dog-piled by an entirely female supported agenda.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 06:24 PM
1

All children have equal value to the childless - when you are holding your children I promise you that you’ll think differently about her additional punishment. You’ll think differently about a lot of things.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 08:52 AM
0

Now you know me so well too, huh? Lol! I have kids. They’re good kids and I love them dearly and although I wouldn’t leave them in a car by themselves under any circumstances I’m fully aware that it’s my decision to make as their parent. You are not my children’s parent nor is anybody else and people like you need to respect that. She made a bad decision that she believed was a good decision with the information that she had and I ask that we should respect that enough to not to further punish h…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:36 PM
1

held accountable In addition to losing her kids due to her own decisions? Do you know what being a parent feels like?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:06 PM
0

You knew them best? Did you know them at all? No, you didn’t know them or the scenario or the why’s but you know that kids are dead and that’s enough to spark your outrage and not only place blame but additional punishments.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:01 PM
1

That’s true, if she didn’t have a reasonable expectation that the kids she’s lived with for 1 and 4 years were safe in a parked car in a parking lot.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 09:55 PM
0

Yes she did know them best and with her experience with them she made a decision that she believed was safe and that’s the entire point - she had a reasonable assumption that nothing bad would happen to her kids when she left them despite your flights of fancy about kidnappers and traffic games. I get it - like most young kids you are a reactionary with a black and white ethical and moral code that you can live by because of your distinct lack of responsibility and life experience. Just like poo…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 09:49 PM
1

Oh, your comment on forgetting kids in the car threw me off since that was a scenario I used in my initial point, sorry. Yes, she didn’t forget her kids in the car she left them in what she believed was a safe environment at the time so her crime looks to be that she didn’t know the car could be put in neutral without the key and that she underestimated the ability of her four year old.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 08:30 PM
0

It usually the same situation every time. A person is asked to maintain their daily routine plus an additional task which is forgotten in the shuffle of their daily routine. Walking or navigating a crowd becomes routine for most people after practice but there are also people who can make sandwiches or drive to work in the same manner. A guy I worked with had no idea what his locker combination or passwords were unless he was standing in front of his lock or computer and watching what he was doi…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 08:11 PM
3

She left her kids in the car while she popped into a grocery store and the car rolled into a body of water and the kids drown - she had no malicious intent. She shouldn’t be charged and she does deserve mercy. That guy who fell asleep with his baby on his chest and the baby smothered also deserves mercy and not charges. Those poor parents forgetting their kids in the car shouldn’t be charged either. What good does it do society to punish people when they are already enduring hell itself?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 07:39 PM
1

if you hate it you hate women Was she particularly feminine or was she a man with boobs? Did she collect supporters to help her in her task even if she didn’t need them? Did she tend to the injured in the aftermath? Did she try to gain consensus from the people around her before acting? Did she have multiple friends that she called on for emotional support during a stressful time? If there was a sex interest did she discuss it with one of her emotional supporters?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 08:32 AM
5

Go and do this thing that doesn’t appeal to women or else they’ll stop doing things that don’t appeal to women! Yep, that’s feminism.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 10:17 PM
2

The saddest thing is that those 22 and 19 other men probably have no idea what constitutes physical or sexual violence.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 09:11 PM
1

I can admire the things other people have without wanting the same for myself and as far as being the baddest mfer in the room - I’ve been that guy most of my life whether I wanted to be or not and trust me when I tell you that there’s no great privileges attached to it - you are harassed by the police often and yelled at from punks in speeding cars.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:54 PM
8

Burt Reynolds’ shoot for cosmopolitan magazine was in 1972. People magazine have been tracking the ‘sexiest man alive’ since 1985. Elvis Presley launched into a hip gyrating sex symbol in 1956. The word heartthrob has been used to describe men who elicit this type of immaturity from women since the 1920s. This is not a new phenomenon for humans - it’s as old as sex itself but what is new is the notion that women are victims of it more than they are beneficiaries. There’s a dishonesty involved in…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:33 PM
2

Liquor Licence Act of Ontario doesn’t seem to have that law that I could find by skimming the sections and subsections. If that was a law than it would also be illegal for adults to purchase alcohol at licenced events or locations where children are present and last I heard you can purchase it a sports events and restaurants so long as you aren’t suspected to supplying it to underage people. You are correct that the licensee has the right to refuse service for whatever reason and that might be a…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 07:55 PM
-10

That’s a dad being a mom.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 10:16 PM
1

Lean muscle is much easier to get, is useful in life, is healthy for you to have, and almost all women will respond positively to it. Did I say this? Why, yes, yes I did... Didn’t once say to lift exclusively for women so I’m not sure where you’re getting that from...
/r/MensRights19/03/19 10:03 PM
3

If a male wants to wear makeup he’s already leaning pretty hard into the feminine camp so femininity retains it’s feminine position and will not be confused with masculinity even if a male’s doing it because he’s a feminine male.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 09:57 PM
1

My impression was that ‘Look at this hypocrisy’ was the point, but if it wasn’t that then, yep, I missed the point.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 05:15 PM
1

I don’t think you understand the difference between lean muscle and bulk muscle. Although it’s called lean muscle a person with it is not skinny by any stretch of the imagination. Women are not fooled by useless hulking muscles and that should come as no surprise since a man’s utility is a primary concern with most women so useful muscle that come with moderate strength training is more attractive than inconvenient and useless hulking muscles. I’m not looking at what women say but what they do a…
/r/MensRights16/03/19 05:14 PM
1

If you are heterosexual - attracting women is surely one of those goals...
/r/MensRights16/03/19 04:47 PM
14

In a crisis women have a tendency to gather sympathetic supporters to serve as agents on their behalf while men tend to face the crisis themselves. These stereotypical behaviours work for us in a lot of ways and against us in a lot of ways but in one of the areas where it’s most noticeable is in a court room. A woman in a trial is stereotyped as is a sympathetic victim even before she presents herself as a sympathetic victim to garner support during her crisis and we all fall for it. When a woma…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 11:41 AM
41

The people who started feminism as a gender equality movement are the same people who betrayed it. It was only gender equality until feminists were asked to sacrifice something for gender equality. The initial group of feminists thought it would be a great idea if men were liberated from their roles in parallel to women’s lib and set some of their members on that task. Those members came back with parental rights for men as the leading problem men faced in society and in less than a decade femin…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 11:04 AM
-13

That’s not hypocritical and some of you fellas will do well by listening to her. Yes, women prefer muscles on men but there’s two kinds of muscles one is the bulk muscles of a superhero or body builders while the other is strength muscles of an athlete. Go for lean muscle or strength muscle as the pics on the right show not the bulk muscle that you see on superheroes. The notion that for women the bigger muscles the better on men is as big a lie as men preferring skinny women - the skinnier the …
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:36 AM
0

Opposites? Let’s play opposites! The opposite of up is down. The opposite of fat is thin. The opposite of republican is women. Wait... that’s not right... the opposite of women is men, but she used women instead of democrat to enact laws against men... It almost as if she believes that republicans are the agents of men especially with the controlling women’s bodies swipe.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:59 PM
1

She’s conflating men with the Republican Party and using that to promote an aggression between genders. According to the latest gallop poll 44% of women and 47% of men identify as pro-life. That’s a 3% gap between genders supporting pro-life and almost half of all Americans. 53% of men and 48% of women agree with abortion under certain circumstances. That’s a 5% gap between genders supporting abortion but only under certain circumstances. In other words, men and women and the Republican Party, s…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 07:37 PM
1

because they used to be oppressed That’s not the correct conclusion. The assumption was that everybody male was entirely masculine and female entirely feminine so the personal rewards were diminished and efforts were increased if either crossed their gender threshold into the other’s domain. We know now that the women behaving in a masculine fashion are not entirely feminine or masculine so it’s not as much a struggle for them and their promotion of such archaic concepts is vanity - ‘I worked ha…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:50 PM
1

It’s not about approval it’s about best conditions for living and monogamy creates that. An intimate relationship with another person is mutually beneficial even without children although children are the largest beneficiaries. There are a series of physical and emotional needs that are easily accessed within monogamous relationships and are accessed simply by being a faithful partner. I think you will find that the leading cause of infidelity is found by the unfaithful having been denied access…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 02:16 PM
0

Monogamy is the preeminent path to creating the optimum conditions for raising children. There are other ways but they are less optimal and have more mixed results.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:17 PM
3

The struggle for equality is due to men asking for their share in it?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 12:54 PM
1

As I recall it was calculated as a large asteroid strike not an individual strike.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:30 PM
0

In the title of the thread... scroll up?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:45 PM
2

That’s great except many of us enjoy women and also enjoy and profit by providing for them. If you can explain how my kids get to have both my care and the material wealth it takes for me to care for them I’m very interested.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:44 PM
1

I’m not sure why you were downvoted either, for me, your question is a common one that most people would ask themselves with a limited consideration to the prejudice it presents against men so it shouldn’t of been hidden by downvotes especially since it lead to a common conclusion between us which is now also hidden. Lately this place seems to be using the downvote button for disagreeing to a point and not for the validity of the point being raised. A point or criticism should never be downvoted…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:27 PM
0

The end result of a society governed by women is absurdly stupid but that’s not criticizing women? How’s this taste as a counterpoint to the pic above? ‘Leave men in charge of children and those kids will be raped and murdered within an hour!’ Where’s the offence in that statement it’s merely a critique to that pic and not men, right? Oh... wait, it’s an attack on men rather than the pic since it attacks men and not the inaccuracies in the pic.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 05:59 PM
8

Shocking until you learn that women are six times safer with anybody other than themselves since 1 in 100,000 women are the victim of homocide and roughly 6 in 100,000 women kill themselves anually. Or that they are 5 times more likely to be killed by an asteroid or comet impact than to be murdered - 1 in 20,000 chance vs. 1 in 100,000. When was the last time you heard of the epidemic of asteroid deaths killing women? If female homocide is an indication that men hate women surely asteroid deaths…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 05:48 PM
9

The first thing you need to understand is that HR is not your friend. The second thing is that HR is there to help the company navigate itself out of problems. The third thing is that every region has different laws covering labour so advice isn’t helpful if it’s not tailored to your region. I will admit that’s a bullshit excuse to not give someone a raise and as much a bullshit excuse as the dirty asshole who told the cleaners at work they couldn’t get a raise because of 9/11.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 12:35 PM
3

That’s exactly what it used to be. The men are trash thing came from black women as a sneering insult to their men by comparing them to the poorest and therefor the worst of white people which they took to calling ‘white trash’. ‘Black men are white trash’ is the totality of the insult directed towards black men by black women.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:17 PM
1

I think you’ve missed the point - the women cross the street because they are prejudging you based on your physical appearance and their inaccurate belief that you are dangerous to them. The OP goes one step further and blames you for their ugly prejudice and although you, like the hundreds of millions of us, are entirely innocent of crimes against women - it’s entirely your fault that women are afraid of you so you shouldn’t be offended by their completely inaccurate prejudice of you.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 07:46 PM
5

Or you can recognize that men are a victim of prejudice in both instances...
/r/MensRights05/03/19 12:42 PM
6

You’d reserve people so that they can be entirely ineffective and unsafe at two fires instead of just one? The military that can’t field sufficient soldiers and materials to a battle retreats until they have enough soldiers and materials.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 12:26 PM
1

No, I think that a fair image of women should be shown and I feel the same about men. Is that a fair assessment of a female future? There’s a saying: two wrongs don’t make a right. Being unfair to females doesn’t equalize the unfairness that men face it just makes more unfairness.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 02:53 PM
4

Who goes to Australia to beat up random Australian kids and women? Is Australia the premier domestic violence tourism destination? Isn’t domestic violence so heavily tied to interpersonal situations typically involving drug/alcohol abuse or a significant stressor that kids and women unrelated to the abuser are entirely safe? This is the sort of crap lazy governments pull when there’s an upcoming election and they’ve had a depressingly unproductive term in office. ‘We did dis ting we iz gud leade…
/r/MensRights03/03/19 02:40 PM
1

hate regardless of truth So, in your opinion, that pic is an accurate assessment of an America with female leadership? A list of absurdity attributed to females being in charge isn’t hate mongering? ‘The future is female’ deserves ridicule not females themselves and this obviously an attack on females because it makes them look incredibly dumb. Your perception of females is that they are so incredibly dumb that the list on that pic will come to fruition with them in-charge. Learn the difference …
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:36 PM
1

I won a debate against a racist once who assumed he was in good company because everybody around him was of his skin colour - I separated him from that illusion by stressing that although the people around him were his colour only he was the racist not them. If I had taken him up on his racial superiority/inferiority debate I’d of turned the room into people as hateful of me as he was and not because they were racists but because I’d of made them defensive and then offensive. Unfortunately for h…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 03:07 AM
-1

Not half as seriously as Vice, the Guardian, the southern poverty law center, and countless other commentators and political powers will take it to make you MRAs look like a smoking pile of sexist assholes. You don’t win against sexism or racism by making more victims of a different kind you win by exposing the lies behind the initial racism and sexism. The title over at MGTOW for this same pic is surprising acceptable considering their philosophy but here you guardians of gender discrimination …
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:39 AM
-3

So some lady shits on paper about females being superior and your reaction is to criticize females and not the shitty paper?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:07 AM
3

It happened again? From 2014’s ‘this is what a feminist looks like’ scandal. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2817191/62p-HOUR-s-women-sleeping-16-room-paid-make-Ed-Harriet-s-45-Feminist-Looks-Like-T-shirts.html
/r/MensRights01/03/19 08:45 PM
1

Another example: Entitled: ‘The future is female. Reality 15 years from now.’ https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/aw77ci/the_future_is_female_reality_in_15_years_from_now/ MRA vs. females.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 08:36 PM
-11

The future is female, reality 15 years from now is the post title and the pic lists a bunch of dumb shit as a result. That’s a stab at females not inequality and it’s utilizing bullshit not truth so it’s an injustice to females and furthermore doesn’t help men one bit so what’s the fucking point of it’s existence except to smear an already poor MRA image?
/r/MensRights01/03/19 08:25 PM
3

The fight is against bullshit not females and this post is a big pile of bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 07:09 PM
7

I’m not entirely sure about that since it would seem that she’s figured out what Napoléon Bonaparte understood of people 200 years ago when he said: A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon. This wasn’t a cynical statement made by a man who hated his soldiers it was the words of a man who valued his soldiers and understood what motivates people. Bonaparte was able to be what he was not by destroying his soldiers self-esteem but by boosting it and that article presents her a…
/r/MensRights28/02/19 01:04 AM
2

you can cry (only at opportune times), you can have feelings (only when those feelings are in tune with our own), we accept you (as a friend unless you obey the above rules). We decry non toxic masculinity until we need you to be toxic and then we’ll shame and criticize you back into line.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 04:59 PM
2

My downvoted counterpoint to women being favoured in all aspects of healthcare: Favoured in healthcare? Not where I am. If a woman has anything other than popular health concern - it’s in their head. I know a woman who had to produce medical papers from when she was a toddler to be taken seriously by her doctor even though she had informed him about the condition and had been complaining about problems associated with her congenital condition for years. Another woman I knew is dead because by th…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:03 AM
1

Everyday this place slips more into man vs. woman instead of truth vs. lies. Being an egalitarian and supporting the MRA cause was never in conflict but lately posting egalitarian views will get you downvoted as often as upvoted and it all depends on whether your statement is pro-men or in defence of women (women not feminism mind you). It’s not man vs. women or even MRA vs. feminism - it’s the truth vs. the untruth whether it supports an MRA agenda or not.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 12:05 AM
2

Encouraging inclusion shouldn’t mean singling out people out for exclusion.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:31 AM
0

Your arguement is to make sweeping generalizations about women, doctors, people, and marxists? I’ll agree with you that ‘some’ people are dumb.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 06:47 PM
0

Does that relate to my position that women aren’t taken seriously by their doctors which makes the all aspects in that pic erroneous? Taking the red pill is supposed to show how the world is and not how you would prefer to perceive it. There’s a lie on that pic which needs to be corrected or MRAs need to acknowledge their willingness to not only accept lies but defend them with spurious arguments not associated with the initial controversy. All aspects is a lie and your willingness to defend it …
/r/MensRights24/02/19 06:34 PM
-9

That’s a great point, but are you sure you want to support an unpopular opinion? A woman needs to make more healthcare attempts and possibly change doctors several times to be taken seriously so women would rack up a bigger bill over their lifetime. I’m not going to bother looking up the difference but whatever it is it could be cost savings if doctors did their job properly the first time.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 05:39 PM
-25

Favoured in healthcare? Not where I am. If a woman has anything other than popular health concern - it’s in their head. I know a woman who had to produce medical papers from when she was a toddler to be taken seriously by her doctor even though she had informed him about the condition and had been complaining about problems associated with her congenital condition for years. Another woman I knew is dead because by the time she got her doctor to take her seriously she died while waiting for the s…
/r/MensRights24/02/19 04:58 PM
2

The instinct to protect is inherent but the ones who need protection is subjective.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 04:53 PM
3

There’s an point where a man becomes useless to women and whatever those men did they seem to of crossed that point. The idea that men should express emotions in the same manner as women is only made to validate women’s own way of expressing emotions. Men’s emotions are only validated if they serve a female purpose and anything outside of that is up for ridicule.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 01:35 PM
19

Who takes a piss in the wind and then blames the wind?
/r/MensRights22/02/19 01:04 PM
1

White parents of Saxon decent who are descended from Puritan pilgrims have done what they’re asking for hundreds of years. Who then are these women of Saxon decent descended from Puritan pilgrims imploring to teach their children WASP culture? Non-Wasps...? Gasp! Say it isn’t so!
/r/MensRights22/02/19 12:51 PM
1

Isn’t that the point? On paper it looks great, a system designed to be fair to all, but in practice you get exploitation and greed. Feminism on paper is positive but in practice you get exploitation and greed.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 12:19 PM
1

You think people don’t pull this on women?
/r/MensRights22/02/19 11:57 AM
7

Raise your sons to understand consent. Raise your sons to respect people. Raise your sons to stand up for others instead of bringing them down. The writer pushes our Knightley duty as if that’s entirely new to men instead of society’s expectation of men for the past 700 years.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 12:35 AM
6

The national organization for women (NOW) is the largest feminist organization in America and for the past 50 years it has fought against shared parenting between mothers and fathers in the event of a divorce. Can you think of anything more equal than both genders sharing a child? Here’s the fun part - when they post their open letters to rally support against equality between men and women they remove the offending letters afterwards leaving no trace of their impropriety and they do that to gai…
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:57 PM
1

I thought this crap was settled in the 1980s with dungeons and dragons? There was a moral panic about the game but it turned out that the people who played D&D knew they were playing a game. I suspect the people who have sex with robots are acutely aware that they’re having sex with a robot not a real live person.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:45 PM
54

Our decision will empower women and non-binary people. By confirming their feelings of disempowerment when they compare themselves to other people? Great work on turning regular people into super-people.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 05:54 PM
6

The life of men in the Middle East is all shits and giggles? I think you will find that anywhere women have it bad men also have it bad. Terrorist group has kidnapped a bunch of girls? They kill the boys... Girls are forced into childhood marriages? They are marrying boys being forced into childhood marriages... Girls are forced to undergo barbaric genital mutilation? The WHO recommends male mutilation... Girls don’t receive and equivalent education to their brother? Their brother is her parent’…
/r/MensRights20/02/19 11:44 PM
3

Everyday is conflation day at feminism. Relationships means sex. Sex means objectification. Objects means women. Women means feminism. Feminism means gender equality. Gender equality means female victim hood. Female victim hood means men are monsters.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 06:35 PM
3

We either allow a man to defend himself or we need to assume the responsibility of defending him.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 05:52 PM
1

Of the top of my head: Real men don’t change diapers. Real men don’t cry over frivolity. Real men can bench press X. Real men can grow a full beard. Real men aren’t gay. Real men smoke Marlboro cigarettes. Real men know how to defend themselves. Real men know how to maintain their property. Real men don’t do drugs. Real men don’t drink and drive. Real men don’t make their own lunches. Real men don’t eat salad. Real men read the newspaper daily. Real men eat meat. Real men protect democracy. Real…
/r/MensRights20/02/19 05:39 PM
1

Real men can’t exist unless they are in the presence of real women and real couples usually compliment each other’s real strengths and real weaknesses and not exploit them because of the love couples have for each other.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 03:39 PM
2

I listed the national average for the United States of America not the United States of non-Hispanic White People because there is no place that is the United States of Non-Hispanic White People. Also, I’m tall; in fact, I’m so tall that my height has crossed the line to be more burdensome than beneficial. For the United States of America I’m in the 99.559 Percentile and although I’m not sure what that means for your imaginary land known as the United-States-of-Non-Hispanic-White-People I doubt …
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:33 AM
5

Women’s lib had at best a decade of equality and that’s only because they were not asked to give up anything. It’s easy to be pro equality when you have things to gain, but the moment they were asked to share kids equally in the event of a divorce they showed their colours and women’s groups continue to lobby against shared parenting to this day.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:59 AM
7

Why time travel to Europe when America’s first real female contender to the presidency ‘Hillary Clinton 2016’ voted in favour of a 2003 war to remove weapons of mass destruction that everybody at the time knew didn’t exist? She personally sanctioned a war on an incredibly flimsy pretext.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 10:17 PM
2

Does that factoid still qualify him as not being short which was the point of my addendum to the above comment?
/r/MensRights18/02/19 09:52 PM
1

An article I read a few years ago suggested that tall men live independently for a longer period but die earlier than shorter men and surmised that the smaller man’s longevity is helped along by medical supervision. Basically, a taller man dies suddenly of a medically avoidable catastrophe and shorter men die out slowly.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 09:18 PM
1

What’s more disturbing for me is the confirmation of white female supremacy expressed. White woman uber alles! If the apparent supreme pinnacle of perfection is under attack what chance is there for the lesser beings?
/r/MensRights18/02/19 06:26 PM
1

What we had before social reform: People jumping to the conclusion that a black male in a nice car probably stole it and white people who think like this are racists. What we wanted with social reform: A person who doesn’t jump to conclusions about skin colour because it’s racist. What we got with social reform: People jumping to the conclusion that a black man in a nice car is probably a tragic victim of social injustice who was forced to steal and white people are racist.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 06:13 PM
4

Men have agency and are responsible for their homelessness whereas women don’t and aren’t and the sexism expressed in this sentiment is a material gain for women, furthers political influence, and is often also exploited by the defenders of misogyny so the building sexism continues by one comparison between genders at a time which further enforces the above sentiment.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 05:25 PM
1

To be more comparable it should be ‘you’re a capitalist for believing that owners, workers, and customers should each benefit.’
/r/MensRights18/02/19 03:50 PM
8

TIL: Segregation is acceptable when people are fearful of others. I was always under the impression that prejudice cowards shouldn’t be facilitated with their fearful bullshit. Have you ever heard the inauguration speech of Governor George Wallace of Alabama during America’s period of racial segregation? Here’s a snippet: In the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny . . . and I say . . . segregatio…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 03:39 PM
7

Mostly it’s used as a bonding mechanism between women as seen in the article and sometimes used as an ego boost for women. My wife was busted at a party a few years ago congratulating herself on her ability to keep me alive and clean despite the fact that I was the only person there who’d ever lived alone for any period of time. She’s also often lamented that my lack of lousiness has her grasping for things to contribute among women.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 02:07 PM
3

Generally, the taller the man the greater their ability to provide utility and provide children who will be able to provide utility to a their mother in her old age. A taller height also indicates good nutrition and healthy lifestyle for that specific person and over multiple generations and is ‘less’ associated with genetic problems (not that tall isn’t sometimes an indication of genetic problems). Having said that, like everything else involving the generalizations of demographics, it’s not li…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 07:15 AM
1

Average height of American male is 5’9” so he’s above average.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 06:20 AM
0

I can’t find what your telling us and the other person who asked for your source material also couldn’t find it and it would seem that you yourself can’t find it since you can’t cite it... why is that? However, I have found an abundant amount of material from multiple sources from the accounts of all sorts of people who knew them and worked with the Curries as students informing us that she was instrumental and entirely deserving of both prizes. Sources who made it very clear that she and her hu…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:20 PM
1

Your historical facts are pulled from a period drama made by a guy who also worked on Star Trek, X-files, smallville, and 90210...? Do some research is not something you are allowed to say when your fucking facts are based on a fucking docudrama!
/r/MensRights15/02/19 06:02 PM
1

I heard that in Germany there’s male designated parking spots that are very tricky to maneuver into. Additionally, I’m impressed that most of the driver’s backed into their spots and not because they’re women but because it’s so bloody uncommon where I live for anybody. The fact that I noticed THAT in the photo tells you just how bizarre that photo is to me.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 11:02 PM
5

154 years ago a man named William Ross Wallace wrote a poem: The Hand That Rocks The Cradle Is The Hand That Rules The World Blessings on the hand of women! Angels guard its strength and grace, In the palace, cottage, hovel, Oh, no matter where the place; Would that never storms assailed it, Rainbows ever gently curled; For the hand that rocks the cradle Is the hand that rules the world. Infancy's the tender fountain, Power may with beauty flow, Mother's first to guide the streamlets, From them …
/r/MensRights14/02/19 10:02 PM
1

Typical inclinations, typical physicality, and typical predispositions aside the differences between men and women are not so great that outliers to tradition become an impossibility or that we can’t fulfil each other’s traditional roles when needed. Sure, my wife is the designated primary caregiver to our children, but I’m also a caregiver and a damn good one at that even with my supposed crippling caregiver handicap. Your position validates the ‘tender years doctrine’, ‘the Duluth Model’, and …
/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:27 PM
1

As a kid I was indoctrinated with notion that Valentine’s Day was completely asexual since we were expected to give valentines to everybody in our classroom. Today, everybody in my house gets chocolates even my son and yes my wife also buys me chocolates with the expectation that i’ll also share them generously with everybody in the house.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 08:15 AM
2

the belief that men have certain inherent rights, roles, and responsibilities that are greater and more valuable than those of women. The greater the role and/or responsibilities the greater is the burden to the people who are expected to adopt those roles or assume those responsibilities. Women’s liberation freed women from their roles and responsibilities not because they were perceived as lesser entitlements but because they were recognized as burdensome. How can men be oppressors to liberate…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:48 AM
2

The tip of his dick was cut off and you expect glamour? You are as ignorant as that kid’s mother.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 06:47 AM
1

Next? Although white men have lost their position among white women let’s not pretend that black men were ever elevated and if things keep going this way they never will be since being male is entirely sufficient these days to bring out the same stereotypes. When I read that line above white and male doesn’t look like the race/gender of a person it reads like two distinct groups - white being one group and male being the other. Or in her own words: “I decided to make sure my press days were more…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 06:24 AM
3

50/50 child custody isn’t anti-woman?
/r/MensRights14/02/19 05:46 AM
6

You can stop counting since it’s already in the article you posted: she was under peer pressure and they are looking for the others involved.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 05:45 AM
1

‘For men with a beast of an appetite’ That’s the sales pitch and folks are buying it as if it’s some sort of gag gift. That company also sells glow in the dark toilet paper, a Santakini (google it), and a first ‘laid’ kit (tee-hee!). I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest that it was ‘invented’ by somebody’s dad or uncle.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 05:34 AM
14

I suppose you’re talking about divorce? That’s a pyrrhic win for either of us so aside from hating the other person we’d have to also hate ourselves and our children in order to initiate that mess. The conditions we have for each other aren’t all that difficult to meet or at least they are significantly less difficult than meeting the everyday struggles that come with the poverty that a divorce would bring.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:02 PM
304

My love for my wife is entirely conditional.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:55 PM
1

I am also married and recognize the paths to self fulfillment that are easily achieved by being a husband and father, and... The problem I have with that pic is that it only addresses risk without also addressing the reward or lack of reward and that’s dependent on the other person. Is a past-her-prime woman with a fantastic professional resume and strong political ideas about making sandwiches going to really get a thirty year old man to risk it all on her?
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:24 PM
1

No sensible man Can sex doll shame you?
/r/MensRights11/02/19 03:55 PM
1

English is a dog’s breakfast.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 03:52 PM
1

Wait... did you just use logic and reason? I thought we weren’t doing that anymore?
/r/MensRights11/02/19 03:39 PM
1

Person one: Hey, you know that manager who was so shitty to work with that she took the most productive crew and made them the least productive crew? Person two: yep. Person one: they’re going to make her a manager again... Person two: that’s great! I can’t wait for her unbridled ignorance and toxic managerial style to make us all hate our jobs again. Hooray! Again, she committed no crimes prior to becoming a manager, and as far as I know, she broke no laws when she was manager. The justice syst…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 03:39 PM
19

A bully.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:27 PM
1

If she tried to apply for leadership again within the company you don’t think her past behaviour as a leader and the considerations of people who had to work with her should be considered? Upper management should expect different results from her the second time around and not the exact same results? A known narcissist wrote a self-serving self-appraisal and your reaction is to lift him up on your shoulders as a folk hero because you don’t personally know him and are unwilling to take the advice…
/r/MensRights08/02/19 07:51 PM
2

assumption that guys can't be lonely Is that really the assumption? Perhaps it’s that men tend to hunt down tailored advice specific to them from specific people instead of foraged advice discovered in the pages of a magazine?
/r/MensRights08/02/19 06:44 PM
-2

I had a manager who was complete garbage to work with to the point that when she was forced to step down from her position my coworkers spontaneously bought boxes of doughnuts and coffee into work in celebration of the joyous event. She wasn’t convicted of a crime so I’m not sure why you think a conviction is relevant to being shitty to work with.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:51 PM
2

Warehouse workers process millions of dollars in product daily while cashiers process thousands. Warehouse workers are responsible for national supply while stores are responsible locally. A delay in warehouse shipments could mean millions in lost sales while a delay at the store could mean a loss of hundreds of dollars. Target Canada’s failure was at the warehouse level and Target Canada no longer exists because of it.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:37 AM
1

A few women with funded publicly outrageous personas determine the standard behaviour of millions of other women? A lot of time in mensrights is spent criticizing this behaviour when it’s directed at men...
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:18 AM
-4

Reportedly in private he had a reputation for being a narcissistic jerk to everybody around him and publically he was a sensitive feminist. Your perspective stems from the spin a company he hired for damage control rolled out after he was exposed so why are you inclined to believe them? According to news reports (not from the star) he was a shitty person to work with even without accepting the sexual assault and harassment charges - does hiring a noted narcissistic jerk sound like a good idea to…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 05:58 AM
5

At work... at work.... at work... The company I work for isn’t legally permitted to know my weaknesses and for a damn good reason. The company I work for is paying me to be an asset to them and these fools want me to promote myself as a liability? I have to wonder where these people work where they aren’t required to cover their asses constantly.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:32 AM
1

If you had to choose between fighting with your children at your feet in the gas attack or fighting with them anywhere but where they’re going to be gassed which would you choose? Although there”s no gas attacks - my workplace is so dangerous that my children would be in constant risk of death if they accompanied me to work so I can’t have them at work and somebody needs to watch them. Am I supporting my wife in this instance or is she supporting me or are we utilizing our strengths for mutual b…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:38 AM
2

Not quite. As women they are still tethered to the feminine side so true masculinity is beyond them and in their vanity they’ve claimed their version of effeminate masculinity as the ideal. They aren’t promoting men and women trading sides they are demanding men and women reject their inherent gender behaviours and adopt the ideal behaviour of effeminate masculinity - they dislike femininity more than masculinity. They can’t reconcile their failure to achieve total masculinity with their belief …
/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:02 AM
3

Is bro culture a white collar thing or is it just another stereotype that doesn’t actually exist in nature? I’m blue collar and I’ve only seen blue collar men be absurdly welcoming to new women especially when you compare it to how new men are treated.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 12:23 AM
34

His attorney’s statement: Shad Bow Wow Moss was wrongfully arrested earlier this morning for the first time after being beaten by an out of control intoxicated female, Ms. Leslie Holden, in an Atlanta condominium. The only two independent witnesses both corroborated his version of events indicating that Ms. Holden was simply out of control and was without a doubt the primary aggressor. For no logical reason officers arrested both parties despite having clear-cut evidence that Bow Wow was the vic…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:19 PM
4

I hope the school administrators took her serial unwanted sexual advances and act of criminal violence as seriously as they took his idiom.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:11 PM
1

In the interest of clarity it’s important to note that woman aren’t protected so much as they are reserved for other tasks which includes tending to children and the injured men. We shouldn’t ignore the partnerships between men and women or we’ll end up with the same onesided gobbledygook that informs the APA and gender studies.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:49 PM
1

Male privilege is their inability to infuse fantasy fiction into their daily lives? Rationality is a privilege?
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:36 AM
3

Death, disease, parasites, bacteria, and illnesses are real problems in this world which can be resolved if only people used toilet paper instead of their bare hands. They prattle off a series of lesser likely things to promote a highly common thing.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:13 AM
1

His company pays him to work for them not on her behalf at home so any work he does at home he also deserves to be paid for. Give her a household budget and whatever she can shave off that budget is personally hers.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 09:41 AM
10

The most recent stat for murder is from 2017 which has 600 people murdered. 74% were male. 488 men were murdered. I believe that’s a male every 18 hours?
/r/MensRights02/02/19 08:51 AM
1

So, I should of carried one of our two children in my womb instead of having my wife carry them both?
/r/MensRights01/02/19 04:09 PM
1

This post, not specifically yours within in, is entirely about MRAs casting a usual female behaviour as entirely negative instead of acknowledging our biological differences. Either gender is a social construct or it’s not and if it’s not then we shouldn’t be jerks to people exhibiting inherent behaviours. A balance is found within heterosexual coupling and not between comparing genders one on one.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 03:54 PM
1

He’s asking her to illustrate her athleticism. She’s asking him to illustrate his abiliity to provide material wealth not possess material wealth. The story a Christmas Carol is specifically about this in a plutonic setting. Scrooge’s fortune does nothing to enhance anyone’s life, including his own, until he shares it and after he does he’s fulfilling his own emotional and physical needs while doing the same for others - or as the book put it “Scrooge was better than his word. He did it all, and…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 03:39 PM
1

Men and women are the same and gender is a social construct so equality means completely equal. Or, Men and women are biologically different and both have inherent interests that are complimentary to each other which creates a gender balance for the majority and imbalance for outliers. Make up your minds MRAs and stop using the first one when it’s favourable for men and the second when it’s not.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 03:11 PM
-5

It’s not a conscious decision that men make and it’s so ingrained that men’s thoughts on physical attraction matches exactly with the health of women. I’m not one to say that there’s no outliers or that men and women don’t make or can’t make compromises within a relationship or within their selections in a partner. Under usual circumstances men prefer and adopt the provider role and women the caregiver role and it’s only tragic to politicians and gender activists that men and women follow tradit…
/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:19 PM
1

Are you going to pretend that a washing machine does everything required to clean clothes?
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:14 PM
-17

How’s this guy’s screening of women to prove their ability to provide a healthy lifestyle different than her screening men for their ability to provide a healthy lifestyle? He’s looking at their athleticism because they’ll probably be the primary caregiver of any future offspring between them because this will provide the best outcome for raising healthy kids and she’s looking at his ability as the primary provider because it will be used to provide materials required to also raise healthy kids.…
/r/MensRights31/01/19 05:59 PM
22

It must be thrilling for these women to survive a fantasy attempted abduction? It must feel good to view yourself as so highly desirable that a fantasy villain will flout the law and moral norms and abscond with you in the middle of a department store? It must be doubly so when you carry a real gun to make the fantasy more real?
/r/MensRights29/01/19 01:02 PM
2

They don’t do everything and you will still need to hand wash therefor it’s an additional tool not a replacement tool since you will still spend time hand washing certain items. Suck it up princess: None of your convenience items are replacements and when you stop being a princess and have to do things for yourself you’ll need more than the modern upgrades you listed above. Why is it so difficult for you to understand? Are you malnourished from having a mother too busy working and cleaning up af…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 11:47 AM
1

There’s two kinds of burgers; there’s a regular burger and then a cheeseburger and when I bad mouth burgers I mean cheeseburgers. There’s two kinds of masculinity; there’s regular masculinity and then there’s toxic masculinity and when I bad mouth masculinity I mean the toxic masculinity. Or as I heard it in it’s original way: There’s two kinds of black people... now, the funny thing is, they never acknowledge the good black people and call all black people by that same name. Pick a new scheme t…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 08:43 PM
5

Women need to be spared the offensively presumptuous male gaze of lower class men.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 06:36 PM
5

The Racist 1980s fire service: White men are better than women and men of colour so those people are at a disadvantage when hiring and that’s why too few of them qualify for the fire service. The progressive 2019 fire service: White men are better than women and men of colour so those people are at a disadvantage when hiring and that’s why too few of them qualify for the fire service.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 06:16 PM
2

As of right now the sub seems to highly disapprove.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:40 PM
0

That’s not the point - machine washing doesn’t replace hand washing was the point - remember? Your list of items are not upgrades they are additional tools? You will still hand wash despite also using a machine.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 12:07 PM
5

With all the time those heroes of gender equality saved with preferred parking you’d think they’d of been the ones to sue the sexist inequality.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 11:58 AM
1

Everybody at my work is paid the same hourly wage but because of overtime and unpaid time off some make more than others.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 07:44 PM
0

Your points were already answered by me and my answers haven’t changed. I will admit that modern diapers are a time saver and a massive convenience for stay at home parents but babies themselves are a massive time suck so although time has been saved on diapers that time is still claimed by the baby’s other needs.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:14 PM
1

All adult human males and females are alphas in human societies. We access everything individually (or limited to a couple) not socially so it’s my house, my spouse, my food, my property, my children and typically no other human has access to these things. A system of alpha/beta doesn’t exist is human society because the foundation of human society is human coupling for long periods of time.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:04 PM
6

That”s bullshit. The Gillette ad promotes a culture that combines Northern European codes of chivalry and colonial Puritanism and that means WASPs. They are promoting WASP culture as the apex culture and that’s entirely within the scope of white supremacy. That ad is nothing more than a bunch of colonial puritans utilizing chivalry to encourage white knights to enforce WASP censorious moral beliefs especially about indulgence and sex. Gillette demands that everybody follow the lead of the ‘maste…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:51 PM
0

Sure, they washed undergarments often enough... Also, rely on less outside support... Furthermore, Ask your mother to read this thread for you...
/r/MensRights23/01/19 05:52 PM
1

And viddy films I would. Where I was taken to, Brothers, was like no cine I ever viddied before. I was bound up in a strait jacket and my Gulliver was strapped to a headrest with like wires running away from it. Then they clamped like lid locks on my eyes so that I could not shut them no matter how hard I tried. The character quoted above committed vile acts of rape and murder what did you do to be treated like Alex in a clockwork orange?
/r/MensRights23/01/19 05:27 PM
1

Daily? That’s embarrassing! Fun fact people didn’t wash their clothes as often as they do today. Sure, they washed undergarments often enough but the rest occasionally and our behaviour has changed to do more laundry more often because of the washing machine and the convenience it presents us. Modern people process more laundry more often and rely on less outside support such as maids, laundry services, or moms in your case. The technology lead to a behavioural change that produces an extreme cl…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 05:19 PM
1

Gillette got it right according to the declining American White Anglo Saxon Protestant culture, not the people themselves mind you, but their culture. That commercial is presenting a culture of Saxon chivalry combined with Anglo Puritanism as the preeminent culture and this cultural combo is a significant part of the culture of the descendants of the colonial English. When Gillette says ‘some men’ are good they mean the remaining descendants of colonial English and their challenge is for other m…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:44 PM
0

I said a washing machine doesn’t always replace handwashing and that EVERYTHING you listed are just additional tools and not replacements. Ask your mother to read this thread to you again since she seems to do everything else for you but who needs wives, right? Not you! You have a mother cleaning up after you!
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:23 PM
11

It sounds like a bad mother. Kids need their father even more than they need the stuff that money can buy.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:15 PM
0

It turns out that, with a partner, you don’t have to do 100% of the jobs as you’ve claimed above and since I’ve done it all I have knowledge and and experience with the subject matter while you on the other hand don’t know shit because you’ve demonstrated that you aren’t.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:04 PM
43

oral sex on people Although men are people she obviously meant men specifically and not people.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 01:52 PM
2

Either it’s an acceptable practice to use demographics to support prejudice or it’s not and if it is acceptable then you can’t blame people for applying additional traits to distance themselves from the prejudice.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:13 PM
1

Boys are treated like steel that can be shaped and molded by us into something useful while girls are treated like a house plant that has no place in that production of their peers. The in-balance between males and females is caused by these idiot do-gooders so that a thirteen year old boy is the sexual equal to his thirty year old sex partner abuser.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 06:51 PM
0

I’ve lived alone without mom or a wife taking care of me for more years than you’ve probably been alive and I know what it takes to clean and maintain my property which is why we’re in this discussion - you clearly don’t know how to care for a home or yourself - for you, the tasks of cooking and cleaning are academic; yes, you’re aware of them but you’ve never actually done it yourself so you don’t know the intricacies so, for you, a microwave replaces a stove... You should be grateful to whoeve…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 05:29 PM
2

Of course it’s for women - it’s an ad that seems to shame all men into behaving like honour dualists for the protection of women but what it’s really doing is equating their product with the end of violence against women, so the message is ‘if you don’t buy our razors you stand a good chance of getting raped.’
/r/MensRights17/01/19 12:43 AM
0

When you move out of mom’s house and get your own place read the label before you toss it into the machine - I think you’ll be surprised.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:25 PM
1

Is it really a matter of a ‘few’ bad apples and ‘few’’ good apples? What are the remaining legion of men - undecided neutrals? The offensive part of that ad is the ‘some is not enough’ as if men protecting women and children isn’t a feature of masculinity and a part of sex selection. The few men who hurt people aren’t exhibiting protective traits found in masculinity which is the driving problem behind this ad. Masculinity is presented as a problem an their solution is men exhibiting even more m…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:20 PM
0

90%? Did a study did you? Haha! I’ve lived alone and had to clean and cook for myself so I know exactly how long it takes and how much effort is put into it while also holding a full time job. All of your convenience items above are not replacements in any way they are additional tools and if you actually lived alone for any length of time doing the work you’d never of considered them as upgrades. A microwave cooked meal is a mistake a person only makes once and then it’s used to heat up pre-coo…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:07 PM
0

A vacuum replaces a broom? Haha, your living arrangement is showing here - I guess you don’t see the benefit of a wife with your mom doing all the cleaning.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 08:49 PM
1

The women of those nations had more power with the men who held direct power over their husbands.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:49 PM
-4

Your fantasy isn’t our reality, but if that’s what it takes for you to swallow your hungry-man dinner then spice it up buddy.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:40 PM
1

Not agency - authority. You are supposed to have a practiced authority rooted in your masculinity that is expected of you to utilize on behalf of people who are supposed not to have it.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:52 PM
45

It’s true that women had limited direct power but they wielded a massive amount of influence historically over the men who had direct power. Traditionally a women in distress had more power thru her power of influence than her husband who usually had no access to any power of influence or any direct power.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 05:02 PM
1

Without the convenience of a penis to blame they are often more accurate in their assessment of why people behave as they do. They still often promote an offending women as also a victim narrative but they still tend to provide an clearer insight into the behaviour than when they discuss males.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 04:30 PM
1

Asking people to suppress their natural inclinations and exhibit someone else’s approved behavioural traits sounds like a psychologists business strategy to me.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 06:14 AM
7

She worked for him at the hedge fund but not in the family garage during Amazon’s first steps? As a man who’s wife has a small online business at home I can tell you that the spouse is basically an unpaid intern. Her own words in 2013: I was there when he wrote the business plan, and I worked with him and many others represented in the converted garage, the basement warehouse closet, the barbecue-scented offices, the Christmas-rush distribution centers, and the door-desk filled conference rooms …
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:41 PM
2

anti women I think they’ll find that 50/50 custody is anti-women.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:53 PM
6

Traditional masculinity ideology The desire to be a good father is bad for men’s mental health? The desire to be a good husband is bad for men’s mental health? The desire to be a benefactor to the community is bad for men’s mental health? Those are universal masculinity ideals and although they can lead to mental stress the positive mental benefits of being a successful father, husband, and community member are massive. They seem to be defining the harmful expectations placed on men and observed…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:36 PM
1

Without the glamour actors are one step up from being seen as a prostitute.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 04:55 PM
1

Men who make a sex distinctions (benevolent sexists) are only sexist to people who honestly believe in the black slate theory and I suspect the entirety of feminists are following the lies despite themselves because membership in their social group depends on observing feminist dogma. A word misspoken or philosophy questioned is sufficient to ostracize a member and she loses her entire emotional support system after alienating her friends and family with feminism.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 10:37 PM
4

They have superhuman abilities due to their insanely poor nutrition, lack of regular exercise, and rough sleeping conditions and although they know that when it comes to being homeless being invisible and soundless is the best practice for keeping away ‘unwanted attention’ most of us don’t know that. Also, he has a penis and as we all have been told that’s a dangerous thing for men to have unless they’ve completed a college course about responsible ownership.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:37 PM
7

I thought we weren’t discussing water being wet around here anymore?
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:14 PM
1

And go for lean muscle over bulk muscle - bulk muscle is worthless for both health and attractiveness. It turns out that men prefer women on the upper end of a healthy BMI and women prefer men with practical physical strength over a bloated mass of hulking ugly.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:11 PM
1

Genocide. Webster’s: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group. Wikipedia (since you are so fond of it): Genocide is intentional action to destroy a people (usually defined as an ethnic, national, racial, or religious group) in whole or in part. The UN: acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 09:05 PM
1

Also your citation: In previous censuses, information on the indigenous speaking population five years of age and older was obtained from the Mexican people. However, in the 2010 census, this approach was changed and the Government also began to collect data on people 3 years and older because from the age of 3, children are able to communicate verbally. With this new approach, it was determined that there were 6,913,362 people 3 years of age or more who spoke an indigenous language (218,000 chi…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 08:56 PM
1

Recognized as indigenous by lax standards. Your own citation: It can also be defined broadly to include all persons who self identify as having an indigenous cultural background, whether or not they speak the language of the indigenous group they identify with. This means that the percentage of the Mexican population defined as "indigenous" varies according to the definition applied.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:53 PM
3

Who would of thought the heir apparent to an aging monarch would have the biggest schedule, followed by the 90+ yr old monarch herself, then the heir’s children in the line of succession and then their wives?
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:45 PM
3

That’s because society ignores men’s motives when selecting a mate but not women’s. Wealthy men being best able to provide for her future children is an exhibition of altruism. She’s meeting the needs of her future children by following her inherent desire to pursue men best able to provide the lifestyle for her kids that she can’t typically afford as the primary caregiver. Healthy women being best able produce and raise healthy children is also an exhibition of altruism but it’s promoted as sel…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 04:19 PM
1

Trump is a bony old ghoul and he’s able to grab them by the pussy - what do they have in common again? Oh yeah, they are all able to exhibit material wealth.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 04:01 PM
0

There’s more than 600 nations in Canada. There’s more than 600 nations in the USA. There’s less than 60 nations in Mexico and only 5% of the population speaks a native language. Indians everywhere, eh?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 10:15 PM
3

The dictionary says we all are but as an egalitarian I can’t stomach their definition of gender equality.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 10:06 PM
1

I always get the impression that they hate femininity most of all and then the (Toxic) aspects of masculinity that even masculine women like themselves typically only access superficially.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 08:00 PM
1

The reverse Pence rule supports fearful women around the globe with human right”s violations such as female preferred parking, female exclusive memberships, gender segregated subway cars, and countless media articles of unabashed support of their prejudice by blaming their prejudice on the victims of their prejudice. This harmful prejudice has entirely eroded a man’s presumption of innocence to a point that a mere accusation is entirely sufficient to cause carnage to an accused man’s personal an…
/r/MensRights29/12/18 07:39 PM
-1

What a silly notion you have about value being exclusively monetary while at the same time sharing companionship with a dog.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 10:32 PM
1

Races exist in sociology but not in biology.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 09:31 PM
0

No, the one where they suppressed natives and developed murky racial identities tantamount to ‘if you feel native than you are native’ resulting in a pollution of authentic natives and the Spanish so that real natives lose their cultural identity and voice to faux natives who don’t see a problem with the Spanish language, culture, or religion, much like yourself, Mr. NoproblemshereTM after all you’re all native! Yay! Natives in grinding poverty? Nah! I’m not poor! Natives lacking upwards mobilit…
/r/MensRights22/12/18 08:56 PM
1

You’re giving credit to the Spanish for completing their genocide?
/r/MensRights22/12/18 07:36 PM
3

Karen DeCrow summed it up best when she said: The courts have properly determined that a man should neither be able to force a woman to have an abortion nor to prevent her from having one, should she so choose. Justice therefore dictates that if a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support. Or, put another way, autonomous women making independent decisions ab…
/r/MensRights22/12/18 07:14 PM
0

So, multiple cats? ;)
/r/MensRights22/12/18 06:08 PM
4

Today, yes they are white, yesterday... not so much. I live in this timeframe, so, yes they are.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 05:26 PM
15

Spaniards aren’t white? Or do you expect me to believe that the descendants of Spanish conquistadors didn’t actually exterminate the native locals but in fact are the local natives?
/r/MensRights22/12/18 04:56 PM
2

We need women for our own mental and physical rewards and thru women we become fathers and that role opens up an entirely new set of mental and physical rewards. Let me say it again: men need women.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 04:45 PM
68

76% of Americans are white and that’s 3 out of 4.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 04:20 PM
1064

Firefighters in China are overwhelmingly Chinese and male. Fire fighters in India are overwhelmingly Indian and male. A nation that’s overwhelmingly one race is going to employ a lot of that race. Why men? Probably because women, unable to pull a person out of a fire, don’t want to be the reason that person dies. Edit: took out a nonsensical and rogue ‘an’
/r/MensRights22/12/18 03:16 PM
8

Since blaming it on a mother’s infidelity is off the table, obviously the home wrecker here is the unknowing victim who ordered the test not the test itself.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 02:37 AM
0

What’s your plan for accessing a magnificent path to self fulfillment - multiple cats?
/r/MensRights22/12/18 02:28 AM
2

My objection isn’t political; it’s judicial.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 02:07 AM
2

There was a popular misconception then that is still fairly prevalent today that a boy suffers no serious harm from the crime; today we know better and most of us are able to separate the fantasy of sex with adult women from the reality that it’s harmful to boys.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:04 PM
6

No no no! You put the victims side by side in the photo spread and you use the worst photo you can find of the perpetrator. Also, you drawn connections between the perpetrator’s traits and the violence act. When a white woman commits a crime it’s simply embarrassing how confused the media gets when reporting it.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 01:42 PM
3

Mrs Morris is now better off in real terms than her ex-husband. Well then, we know what must be done.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 12:44 PM
2

Just like his father and grandfathers before him, but even better. Like them, he too, will not be liberated from his roles to women but he will be more indebted to women for allowing him to serve them.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 12:23 PM
3

Mine was the first generation told that we would need to go into higher education or basically go live in the dump as a hobo, and as a result, many of us went out and earned a diploma. We spent money earning diplomas to jobs that don’t exist. Of all the people I know only a handful are in their field of study and most of them retooled after they got a job unrelated to their initial diploma. The diploma straight out of college giving you access to wealth and opportunity is a fantasy that dishones…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 11:33 AM
4

Bullshit. At this point - he’s presumed innocent unless you or anyone can prove otherwise, so offer up proof that supports the accusation or accept that you are obliged to lean towards innocence, because it’s grossly unfair to his reputation for us to defer to a middle of the fence philosophy that casts him forever as a perpetual sex offender.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:31 AM
1

Yes, it’s due to racism, but not in a way most westerner’s think - the simple truth is that white people are the least racially offensive group to people internationally. It’s a marketing kind racism to appease a multiethnic tolerance for white player characters, whereas, a character with a different ethnicity is often less tolerable. Their own ethnicity is of course most preferable, a white ethnicity is tolerable, and the rest is a racist crap shoot between global racists who hate each other. N…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 12:43 AM
5

There’s going to be a controversy between two sides but only one side knows the topics to be discussed... yeah, that’s modern intellectualism... As a teenager I debated social politics face to face with violent neo-nazi skinheads under better terms than that.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 11:17 PM
10

That excuse doesn’t work for kids at liquor stores, kids at casinos, kids at voter registration offices, kids in Canada in local pots stores, or kids at the DMV who want to drive. A 27 year old female school teacher and male child statutory rape? A boy’s wants are suddenly a mitigating factor.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 11:01 PM
30

Because judging a group of people by the actions of others has worked out so well for us historically.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 12:35 PM
9

Cute. Only a couple of those points are universal, and those can be found on the side panel in this subreddit; the rest are situational and alternate between how much the opposing person exhibits desirable traits.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 12:08 AM
-5

Why not just throw that poor bastard to the wolves! The promotional ad notes that 3 Dollar Bill bar is "queer owned & operated and we foster a safe space from love. We respect all human persons as long as those human persons are also respectful to the ones around them. How the fuck did he survive in a place that touts itself as fostering ‘a safe space’? There’s just no fucking room in America for such things as ‘respecting all humans’! So just take your goodwill toward men somewhere else because…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:51 PM
11

The global gender gap has improved, slightly. Global. Why do I get the feeling they shopped around for the worst stats they could possibly find that were still somewhat relevant to American women?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:31 PM
3

They will not be able to roll it out without singling out transboys unless they roll it out to all boys without any distinction given between a trans boy and a non trans boy. When appropriate and with careful management single gender sessions are provided for in depth, safe discussion about managing periods. Single gender sessions that has trans boys being girls for the day by sitting in on the girls session? Is the lonely trans boy in his own very own session? Are all boys in a boy”s session an…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 11:26 AM
1

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks" Everyone else is being quite civil, but not you, you’re exhibiting a level of agitation that”s out of step with your fellow compatriots - why is that exactly? Is it to make yourself look above reproach so that the accusations you are making aren’t directed at you? Not you! You are vehemently against it! Look at the catalog of excessive hate you’ve constructed and directed a man who doesn’t see that kid as a sex object, isn’t swayed by the propagandist’s…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:55 AM
1

How is he a stripper if he didn’t take his clothes off? How is he half naked when he’s obviously fully clothed? What in your mind is does that money suddenly represent to turn tipping a performer with money into a sex act? It represents money - no more and no less, but you’ve been manipulated emotionally to see those tips as gratuity for sex act instead of tips for a drag queen performance. The stripper and the nudity were put in your head, so the conclusion that you’ve arrived at, based off of …
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:35 AM
0

You’re the one supporting the fantasy that he took clothes off and was half naked... Me? I’m calling for more rational minds to prevail not minds being lead around by their _____. Heart strings, to be sure! Despite your adherences to your flights of fancy about men in bars and what they do to little boys. Oh, by the way... that ‘article’ was put up on Milo Yiannopoulos’ website, so, you are also supporting a gay man who once said: In the homosexual world, particularly, some of those relationship…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 09:44 AM
1

There’s no age threshold for leaving underage kids home alone by themselves - did you know that? Can you guess why? It turns out that we, as a society, believe that a kid’s parents are the best possible people to determine their kid’s ability with things that are primarily subjective and your hypothesis is primarily subjective. I’ll openly admit that I’m not a fan of him or his parents but unless you have clear evidence that he’s been or is being criminally abused we cant step in and push aside …
/r/MensRights18/12/18 09:21 AM
1

Do you know what facts are? The article says the kid is half-naked but the the pictures of him show us that he’s, point of fact, fully clothed. The article relates him to a stripper but, point of fact, he never took any of his clothes off - not even those ridiculous wristbands. As a retarded person I’m not inclined to take the remainder of an article at face value when I’ve noted that there”s already been some factual inconsistencies. Maybe, it’s because I’m retarded, but when somebody tries to …
/r/MensRights18/12/18 08:52 AM
1

"menstruation must be inclusive of all genders".
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:54 AM
6

Wait for a class trip and then get all the boys to immediately need period products hourly and... pandemonium!
/r/MensRights17/12/18 01:17 PM
1

A kid imitating a popular female singer with fashion, lip synching, and pantomime dancing on a stage is a sexual act... how?
/r/MensRights17/12/18 12:07 PM
-1

O.o
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:50 AM
0

Children compelled to dress like little adult models, strut on a catwalk like models and smile at an adoring group of mothers, all hell bent on seeing to it that their child “wins” is the antithesis of play. Shouldn’t that read: Underaged girls are forced to dress like whores and prance around on stage like strippers for the sexual pleasure of adult women for a chance at earning cash prizes is the antithesis of play. Yeah, you brought up a great point that highlights this situation perfectly.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:46 AM
-1

One of us looks at those pics and sees sex and it’s not me, so... I think you’ve learned something about yourself today.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:28 AM
-1

If you mean dress up in drag and dance like a popular female entertainer than drag queen enthusiasts. I’m not sure about your source of the scantily dressing and erotic dancing so you might want to check it.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:19 AM
1

Agree’d, he’s a funny fish - now what? Shall we crush him until he’s inclined to only pretend to be normal so that we can feel assured in our illusion that everything is right with this world? I’m one of the only people here who doesn’t perceive his performance as a sex act so your accusation is ridiculous. I see a kid performing in drag while you see a sexualized kid being exploited for sexual purposes.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:12 AM
1

Sexually exploitive Here we go with more of the same. She’s wearing a bra top in the video but his is clearly a sleeveless belly shirt and although his costume is reminiscent of hers it’s been significantly toned down to be a non sexy reproduction. That alone should indicate to a rational person that sexual exploitation wasn’t the object of the performance and yet here we are with you smearing men as sex criminals and me asking you to look beyond a propagandist’s perspective and see those men as…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 10:05 AM
1

Locked up and beaten for failing to equate a 10 year old pantomiming a famous female singer’s g rated music video with a sex show? How did no doubt slip their raunchy sex show past the FCC in the 1990s?
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:34 AM
0

Are you thinking a bar like a place where people drink and play pool? Picture an entertainment club with a stage that drag queens perform on like the entertainment showrooms in Las Vegas, you know, the kind where you sit and drink and watch a person perform magic acts or singing or dancing on a big stage for the night’s entertainment. You are being manipulated by a very well done piece of propaganda to think that there’s more going on than harmless folks in an entertainment club supporting a wan…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:11 AM
0

So, you don’t see it as sexual and they don’t see it as sexual but somebody see’s it as sexual? Many drag shows feature performers singing or lip-synching to songs while performing a pre-planned pantomime, or dancing. The performers often don elaborate costumes and makeup, and sometimes dress to imitate various famous opposite sex singers or personalities. Did you say he was dressed up like Gwen stafani in her I’m just a girl video? If it looks like a drag queen, walks like a drag queen, talks l…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:55 AM
-2

I think the problem is that all you guys aren’t aware that the ‘bar’ this kid performed at isn’t just some random gay bar where he danced on table tops spontaneously for pocket change - it’s an entertainment bar where alternative entertainers, like drag queens, perform their acts on a large stage for the entertainment of people who enjoy that type of show. The kid put on a legitimate drag show on a legitimate stage where drag queens are often the night’s entertainment so that kinda makes the not…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:47 AM
1

You look at that kid and see sex instead of a kid in a dance costume?
/r/MensRights17/12/18 12:19 AM
-1

When he takes his clothes off in a strip club for people’s sexual pleasure would be the primary indication that it’s become sexual. However, he danced with more clothes on than I’m currently wearing as a drag queen in a bar for then amusement of patrons who are the target audience of drag queens.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 12:04 AM
1

Dress scantily A halter top and long pants? dancing erotically Did he perform an erotic dance? Where is that reported?
/r/MensRights16/12/18 11:57 PM
-5

They are supporting a kid’s dream to be a drag queen but you are making his drag queen dance into a sexually perverted encounter with nonsense about him stripping for gay men’s sexual pleasure. They saw a kid in drag busking but you see a kid exhibiting sex. YOU are the one sexualizing the kid. YOU are the on tainting this with as a sex scandal. YOU look at that 10 year old boy in that picture and think SEX not them.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 11:54 PM
-7

Stripper clothes = what Larry the cable guy wears? Sure the kids exposing his belly but Larry is showing his chest when he often has his shirt unbuttoned at the top. TIL that Larry the cable guy’s clothes basically makes him a stripper.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 11:45 PM
-5

You’re the one tainting this story with sex allegations and that’s because you see the kid as a sex symbol.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 10:28 PM
-4

Or he’s wannabe drag queen and the crowd is humouring his performance, but hey, you carry the ‘men are perverts’ banner as high as you fucking can sunshine, but don’t ask why some lady is stalking you at the park when you are out with your kids.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 10:11 PM
-2

I’ll admit that drag isn’t a typical kid’s activity but I suspect the kid’s not typical and as a result his fan base isn’t found in people like me. Different strokes for different folks. The gay bar took him in and gave him a safe place to perform his art without the same variety of judgements that we are seeing in this very thread. A kid did a drag performance in front of a genuinely nonjudgmental crowd and those folks have been accused of being criminals rather than people showing friendly goo…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 10:05 PM
-16

When do you realize that YOU are the one whose sexualizing a child?
/r/MensRights16/12/18 07:33 PM
-15

You know him then? As a person who knows - what parts of his behaviour suggests to you that he’s being psychologically harmed?
/r/MensRights16/12/18 06:57 PM
-10

You’ve never heard of a child beauty pageant that has little girls much younger than 10 dress up? The problem isn’t in the behaviour itself it’s with the confusion you bring into it by sexualizing the child. A kid dancing in drag becomes a stripper. A gay bar becomes a strip club. A kid in a halter top becomes half naked. A man hugging his teenaged daughter becomes a creep. A dad changing a diaper becomes a pervert. A female sword swallower is basically guilty of crimes that would put them above…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 06:47 PM
1

In order for it to be a strip tease you need to take clothes off. This was a drag queen performance in a ‘safe space’ for alternative people, as a non-alternative person, my only job is to ensure the kid wasn’t injured or harmed, so if you have evidence that the kid was abused at the bar I’m willing to hear it, but note that you’ve proven yourself as untrustworthy source of information, so... yeah.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:01 PM
-20

What’s an age appropriate place for a 10 year old drag queen to perform? When you come up with your answer I suspect you’ll know why he was performing at a gay bar that enforces the ‘safe space’ philosophy. To be honest with you, I don’t ‘get it’, but I don’t have to ‘get it’. My responsibility as a citizen is to ensure that kid isn’t harmed, and if he is, it’s not obvious enough to warrant my protection or yours.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:51 PM
1

There’s two sides to a story and at this point I think we can all agree, including yourself, that you can’t be trusted with your side. Don’t be sore you should be very busy frying up the fish from other subs you trolled up.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 03:49 PM
1

Oh, well that’s different! Let me get my pitchfork and torch! It’s funny I could of sworn it had a quote about the kid being half naked, such as: The event, called Club Whoa! was hosted at Brooklyn gay bar 3 Dollar Bill and was promoted on social media. Desmond also celebrated the performance on his own Instagram page, which has 105,000 followers. Adults who wished to watch a half naked child dance in a bar could buy tickets on an Eventbright page in which the venue described itself as “queer ow…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 03:30 PM
-4

I want both sides of a story normally, but that’s especially true when parts of the story I’m being told by one side contains obvious bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 03:03 PM
32

I believe this is a parody of the ‘teach men not to ______’ groups.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 02:42 PM
-1

half naked Ugh. That kid ain’t half naked he’s fully clothed. What other bullshit are we being told by this article?
/r/MensRights16/12/18 11:01 AM
3

Or we can accept that people making personal life choices is only a problem for fascists who don’t like their choices. It’s ridiculous that women’s liberation is currently only achievable by fulfilling the agenda of women’s groups and not the desires of women themselves.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 05:41 PM
7

Why not ‘gingerkind’?
/r/MensRights15/12/18 07:48 AM
2

Pierre Trudeau, Brian Mulroney, Jean Chrétien, and Dalton McGuinty come to mind in Canada.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 07:23 AM
8

It’s actually a normal political strategy in Canadian politics for unpopular leaders to resign before the next elect to give their party a fighting chance to keep the majority and if I remember correctly this strategy extended to Canada from English politics.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 08:46 PM
2

A victorious conclusion to truly aggressive battle between two belligerents that one side completely failed to notice but if those men could read her mind they’d of been deeply defeated with their normal everyday behaviour.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 08:02 PM
16

With over 100,000,000 men in the US having an inherent instinct to kill women whenever they hear the word no we should expect much more than 1800 women murdered annually.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 04:03 PM
5

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lt-jg-sarah-coppock-pleads-guilty-in-uss-fitzgerald-collision/ You don’t remember the USS Fitzgerald crashing and killing several navy crewmen way back in the summer of 2017? Wait a second! 2017? That was just last year!
/r/MensRights13/12/18 12:15 PM
5

The handles on the doors would indicate that these are single occupant bathrooms so privacy isn’t even an issue.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 11:26 AM
1

I imagine it depends on room availability at the time?
/r/MensRights13/12/18 05:35 AM
7

It’s more about maximizing women’s choices while limiting their accountability than sharing equality with men.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 05:22 AM
13

In 1944 she was a woman playfully exhibiting the power she has in her arsenal to protect her reputation if things go bad for her. In 2018 she’s a victim.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 04:40 PM
1

You know what’s more simple than inventing a new language? Using the common language we all already use properly.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 03:43 PM
3

We need to stop raising women to fear strange men Correct, the sexist propaganda directed against men is the problem. and start raising better men. You just committed an act of sexist propaganda directed against men.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 03:40 PM
827

Adult women need 35+ years of additional experience in order to be equal to a teenaged male? The government doesn’t think much of women does it?
/r/MensRights12/12/18 03:20 PM
13

So... she wasn’t switched and whatever her imagination thought was going to happen - didn’t happen - imagine that!
/r/MensRights12/12/18 03:02 PM
19

Fatherhood is the pinnacle masculine achievement and nurturing is the entire part of that role and it mostly comes naturally. There’s 71,000,000 fathers in the US alone and from a quick unscientific internet search I found that an average person will walk past 10 to 30 murderers in their lifetime.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 04:48 AM
56

First, a woman was assaulted in New York by a kid’s lecherous backpack, and now women on planes are getting assaulted by men’s lecherous knees... when will men stop turning typical mundane human interactions into excessively outrageous sexual attacks? Good god! My knee touched the knee of another man and I’m fairly sure it was mutual! How do I tell my wife and children that I’m knee gay?
/r/MensRights12/12/18 12:48 AM
4

A fear based media slapping a strangle hold on viewership by terrorizing women with moral panics about men loosely fits the definition and objectives of terrorism.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 03:23 PM
2

I’m flattered by your proposal but I’m already a husband and father with an agreeable division of labour. Good luck in your search.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 02:26 PM
3

It’s a partnership that creates the best odds at raising healthy kids into adulthood with both people leading with their best foot forward.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 02:02 PM
2

Kids have needs like food and shelter and vaccinations and diapers and clothes and all sorts of things like that which currently costs more than 200,000 dollars total.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 05:20 PM
65

Why isn’t she complaining about the youtube enforcer who physically slaps women’s hands every time they try to put multiple ads in their videos? Oh... there is no enforcer and she’s just bad at math and business... well, that’s embarrassing after what she said about attitudes of ancient industries...
/r/MensRights10/12/18 03:12 PM
8

Emotions are a natural instinctive state of mind so expecting people to consciously control their emotions without regarding their natural inclinations is bullshit. Asking men to cry on demand is as ridiculous and asking that kid to stop crying on demand and tying any of this to violence is beyond ridiculous.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 11:02 PM
2

Yeah.. and it lead to the English bringing back the punishment of being disembowelled before she was drawn and quartered - it’s not one of my best moments... wait... that didn’t happen - the police, the crown, and my accusation all lead to nothing negative for the anonymous girl. That would mean the injustice isn’t found in an accusation alone but it’s found in the damaged caused by a mere accusation. He’s being punished for something he’s supposed to be presumed innocent of until he’s convicted…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 10:16 PM
-9

The guardian didn’t say that he wasn’t a boy. She said he wasn’t a man and called him a sissy. He’s not a man and by the time he is a man he probably won’t cry over needles and it won’t be due to him being raised to cry or shamed about crying - that’s silly human vanity. It will be because he’s in that chair by own choice and his body will give him a chemical cocktail that will bring about a feeling in him to fight and conquer his fear.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 08:27 PM
1

People have lost sight of the fact that public debates are made to convince an audience and not to change the mind of the opposing debater, their mind is already made up, so too often the last resort for winning an already lost debate is often the first one used - personal insults. Without knowing too much about a person the insulter will exploit whatever they do know and with little to go by except skin colour... it’s probably going to be skin colour.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 07:44 PM
1

The original conclusions made a poor impression but the observation that men are inclined to flaunt what women desire - was correct. A business suit flaunts material wealth and providing material wealth is a parental role that the typical caregiver can’t access readily so they also need a partner for creating their best odds for raising healthy children. A man will want to wear a suit for the same reasons women showcase their health and get the same boosts to accessing his own emotional self ful…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 01:49 AM
2

The last accuser was the only accusation to make that argument against him and she’s been deemed a serial false accuser by the investigators. His adulthood of life restrictions are due to what the police have determined to be a teenaged girl’s lies.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:11 PM
1

Suits were the only thing men wore during the Victorian period up until the late 1970s. During my lifetime it has become unusual for a man to dress in a suit as everyday wear so really men have only adopted the suit as a specific business uniform from the early 1980s and onward. Men desire and woman are inherently inclined to display a young and healthy appearance because a youthful and healthy woman has the best chance to produce and raise that man’s children so women’s fashion is designed to h…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 08:57 PM
4

Your point 4 and 5 are directly related and it’s something common enough in the last century to create a stereotype about fatherhood in general instead of an observation about father’s suffering from PTSD. My generation doesn’t have widespread PTSD so the stereotypical father who we all lived with for three generations is not the father my kids live with and when we see these stereotypes on tv it’s out of step with our kids experience with their millennial fathers. Basically, my Dad, my grandfat…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 05:59 PM
2

A person’s fitness level is less important to compatibility than education? Never has my wife and I ever sat down together for a night of determining the stress mechanics of the various materials around us and then illustrate that material’s failure in technical drawings but our matching fitness level is tested daily.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 04:48 PM
2

Can you explain how underaged kids trading sex pics is related to a sex attacks? He’s supposed to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law under the rules of a fair trial but he’s being punished without ever being able to defend himself because there was no criminal trial because the crown brought no charges against him in court.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:31 AM
1

The metric of female ceos or female board members doesn’t apply to private companies. Guess who owns a private company?
/r/MensRights07/12/18 05:38 PM
1

Most women would need to overcome their own inherent inclinations to access a level of success that is met by most men obeying their inherent inclinations. The shear number of men who exhibit the traits nessessary for success normalizes it culturally and the external rewards of people celebrating men who exhibit those traits simply further feeds the internal rewards he’s already experiencing.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 05:31 PM
4

She could sell the company and live like a billionaire, or continue to work harder than anybody feels a billionaire should, and keep her father’s team, which is probably mostly men, employed for life.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 05:02 PM
12

‘And Mary said, Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word. And the angel departed from her.’ Luke 1:38
/r/MensRights07/12/18 04:18 PM
1

I was banned from T_D for pointing out hypocrites I don’t know whether to laugh or cry...
/r/MensRights07/12/18 12:09 AM
2

Awe crap! It sounds like they felt pressured into making a consent video... now you’ll need to make a consent video of women giving their consent to make a sex consent video.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 11:17 PM
2

It goes to show that witch hunts are not about the spectacle or else they’d expand the panic to women - they’re about fearful people trying to completely sate their uncontrollable fear.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:48 AM
3

They are oppressed because, although they have the ability to make their own choices - their individual choices unsurprisingly create a gender inequality when their demographic is compared to men. Trudeau’s failure to prevent his wife from establishing her ideal work/life balance benefits his wife and family but is a signal of statistical oppression for Canadian women.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:36 PM
7

Why the sudden push for demographic distinctions - I thought we were all ‘peoplekimd’?
/r/MensRights05/12/18 09:38 PM
9

If we insist that men can’t physically defend themselves from violent women than we’re obliged to protect those men from violent women.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 09:27 PM
2

Her influence on the board is the highest of all.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:46 PM
1

Typical masculine traits are only scary and hurtful when they’re directed towards women, but when they’re directed under her influence, as they typically are, they are a powerful asset to adult women.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:30 PM
6

Who else banned authors by demographic regardless of the field or merit? Also her: Saying the far left and nazis are the same is like saying "a few problems with this plane: my seat is kinda small, and also engine failure"
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:17 PM
11

Both perspectives are wrong. Men desire women who are at the peak of physical health because a very healthy woman will birth and raise very healthy children and their child’s mother desires a provider because they can’t do both roles without it impacting negatively on the health of their children. Both groups are maximizing their best odds at raising healthy children by cooperating with each other’s inherent desires.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 01:19 PM
0

female, but not feminine, so don’t get too excited Mrs. America, she doesn’t mean you.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:43 PM
10

First, don’t shoot the messenger, but... According to his staff he meant women need to work the lucrative but shitty jobs just like men. Here’s the full quote: “So, there’s all sorts of shifts we’re making because we know that you cannot succeed as a society if you are holding back half of your population. And looking at all the different barriers and moving forward on reducing them, on eliminating them as well as, as a government body, looking at how every different decision can have an impact …
/r/MensRights05/12/18 01:27 AM
25

How absurd to believe that the queen consort took orders from male peasants. Edit: or had no influence over her husband or the heir apparent.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:36 AM
1

I needed someone to explain the difference between the big show and raw talent to me once too, but in all fairness to me - even the performers of death metal know their music is shit.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:19 AM
4

You can’t fight for everyone all the time. You can and must when the boys and girls live in the same culture and are expected to live in unison so any approach to helping one must be counterbalanced by making sure the other isn’t left out. Most MRA problems are due to the gender imbalances caused by unilateral decision making.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 09:06 PM
13

Yay! Now men can pay more for car insurance and their wife’s health insurance...
/r/MensRights04/12/18 07:33 PM
221

The girls endure sexual violence and the boys endure physical violence. The girls and boys are both arranged by their parents to be married too young. The girls have advocates, like the woman above, working to spare them of the horrors of violence and early marriage.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 12:13 PM
4

‘Top YouTube earners’ If you go by subscription numbers Dan TDM drops behind two women. If you go by most viewed Dan TDM drops behind five women - four of which are international celebrities - and one who’s specifically a toy reviewer and all you see is her hands. How does Dan make more money than a female toy reviewer with more views over all? She doesn’t barrage her viewers with ads. Dan TDM gets more money from the multiple ads he puts in his vids.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:28 AM
8

The age of consent in Tennessee is 18. How can a person exercise a power they won’t have for another two years?
/r/MensRights04/12/18 07:39 AM
2

Having undiagnosed post natal depression as a man is a one-two punch. The depression is bad enough but since they’re usually also failing in their role as an engaged supporter to their new family they face hostility from people instead of compassion and help.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:14 PM
9

Our top story, the financial news company Bloomberg, doesn’t get the concept of Risk vs. Reward.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 10:47 PM
7

Male dominated jobs are terrible to do; women workers are most affected.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 10:19 PM
5

My philosophy on transgender: That’s YOUR dress - YOU wear it. Which is oddly similar to my philosophy on religion: that’s YOUR religion - YOU practise it. Which is oddly similar to my philosophy on vegetarian: that’s YOUR veggie burger - YOU eat it.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:30 PM
5

That sign exists for the same reason and purpose that all segregating signs exist - the pandered group and their agents in power at best don’t challenge the lies they are being told and at worst exploit the lies for personal gain but either way the ‘other’ people lose.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 08:55 PM
1

1 in 16 ain’t cherries bub.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 01:35 PM
1

If only those short, bald, facially ugly men were short, bald, facially ugly women then their grass would be so much the greener! Wait... bald women? Yeah, it turns out that 1 out of 16 women experience baldness before 50, but for some reason unclear to anyone, we never see them that way.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 09:32 PM
1

Silly me! Here I’m dwelling on the effects of people ownership but my mindset should be in a realm beyond good and evil. Ownership of people has an upside that ethicists like me, run away slaves, participants in revolts, human rights (including men’s rights), and the creators of modern law tables and their constituents don’t perceive. Tell me Zarathustra, why torture yourself in a rights forum if you exist beyond the petty concept of rights? Still waiting...
/r/MensRights02/12/18 06:23 PM
1

Still waiting for you to explain how dominance and ownership over a person is a positive thing...
/r/MensRights02/12/18 04:30 PM
1

The word was injected for your sake not mine. I saw your propaganda for what it was - a judgement that a people’s beneficial behaviour actually fulfilled selfish purposes. Did you know that, according to certain people: men’s desire for young and physically fit women is not because it assures both healthy children and a healthy lifestyle for children but because men are selfish pigs only interested in their own sexual gratification? Do you see the propaganda at work behind that sentiment? They’v…
/r/MensRights02/12/18 04:14 PM
1

Nope, you made a judgement: it’s both a dominance AND ownership display. I disagreed and instead of making a counterpoint you’d prefer to discuss semantics. Your judgement of women’s villainous behaviour seen in the quote I provided is absurd for the reasons I gave. Women value personal security and material comfort and men value health and tending and all for the benefit of their future children together. A man giving up his coat for his intended is an easy A.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 09:43 AM
1

You understand I wasn’t making a judgement call
/r/MensRights29/11/18 09:21 AM
1

It's both a dominance AND ownership display.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:38 AM
1

It”s confirmation that you are, and are inclined to, be resilient which highlights your ability to provide security as well as material comfort - both will serve your future family together well. Much like women preparing a sandwich for their boyfriend isn’t evidence of oppression but a demonstration of her ability and inclination to tend to others which will serve their future family well. It’s fairly universal and works for most folks not just some folks. Can we stop pretending that human sex …
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:03 AM
5

Kim Waggott, 49, was awarded a £9.76 million settlement and £175,000 in annual maintenance payments How do you get 9.76 million and then convince anyone other than a child that you still need annual maintenance payments?
/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:34 AM
3

The justice system becomes the instrument of injustice when an innocent person is punished and that innocent person is made to suffer a series of criminal acts at the hands of society. Forcible confinement and a denial of basic human rights being the universal crimes committed against the innocent person.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 03:47 PM
1

Again? Those assholes just don’t learn... oh, wait... Tom Magliozzi died in 2014. This was the same event from four years ago.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 03:34 PM
0

Although all men have emotions most men aren’t inclined to show emotions in the same manner as women. Even under an incredibly sad event I’m not inclined to show tears or allow emotions to govern my behaviour or thinking which unsurprisingly permits me to always fulfill my family roles as a husband and a father - it’s almost as if, as I am, I partner well with most women’s needs. My best odds at mating are found by following my own inherent inclinations.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 07:44 PM
0

He didn’t meet her emotional needs because he was too overcome with his own emotions. His emotions made himself useless to her. The current social demand for men to exhibit female levels of emotional response simply makes men unsuitable partners to most women.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 06:19 PM
8

If you didn’t want the responsibility of a pregnancy you should of kept your pants on is something we only tell men.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:44 PM
1

Women have had to go into the labor force to compensate for declining wages of men. That’s not what we are being told about women but it does explain their creeping increase in employment year over year over the abrupt universal increase that you would expect from eager work enthusiasts.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:04 PM
1

If she’s only worth 15 they won’t keep her for 20.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:13 PM
1

Challenges like human interaction not being the main part of the job? Now take a look at the pic they chose to advertise for women to learn programming.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 03:57 PM
1

For equality, will the men selling cupcakes be allowed to leave at 6:30?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 03:17 PM
0

Emasculation would be the most effective one for silencing men prone to nagging but when it’s applied to women it’s abusive.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 02:50 PM
15

And they are less human because of it.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 10:40 PM
178

The top one is said by men who are constantly, for the lack of a better word, nagged by their wives. Nag: to annoy or irritate (a person) with persistent fault-finding or continuous urging. The idea is that it’s easier for men to follow the path of least resistance and comply than resist and experience more irritation. I’m sure women are nagged but women also have access to silencing tools they can use with a clean conscience that men can’t use without feeling abusive or sexist.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 10:04 PM
4

You would of thought that barrier would of been broken before women demanding men’s barbers serve them too but here we are.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 07:10 PM
10

Anthropologists claim that three Ps — providing, protecting, and procreating — define modern American manhood, but that’s a localized phenomenon. Localized to the planet earth?
/r/MensRights26/11/18 07:03 PM
37

Canada’s charter of ‘conditional’ rights and ‘bendable’ freedoms didn’t appeal to your teacher?
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:53 PM
1

Congratulations to that woman on her Pyrrhic victory (and yes she too is an idiot.)
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:49 PM
101

Wishful thinking. One clause in our charter of rights and freedoms specifically denies rights and freedoms if you’re the wrong race, gender, religion, or colour making the entire document worthless. If they wrote the entire charter to reflect the provisions in that clause the hypocrisy would be readily apparent, but they wrote it like the concepts of rights and freedoms mean something only to betray them later with a few words.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:34 PM
2

Women are the main family buyers and they apparently like this type of crap. Shouldn’t the company have a better female pedigree than nepotism? I expected another ‘spanx’ story...
/r/MensRights26/11/18 12:35 PM
21

i heard the same, almost word for word, from white racists in the 90s justifying their use of a racial slur that begins with ‘n’.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 11:57 AM
1

He’s politically correct and she’s biologically correct. He needs to illustrate his ability to provide for a family. She needs to present herself as young and healthy. Congratulations to him on his Pyrrhic victory. Idiot.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 11:44 AM
6

My (insert ingroup) thinks that everybody (insert out-group) is a (negative trait). You friend’s problem is a common human one.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 11:12 AM
15

often Here’s the problem. I often have weekends off. I often buy gas. I often drink tea. I’ve never once harmed a woman - that’s an incredibly rare event.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 10:29 PM
19

That letter was not written by an adult. I suspect she read the slogan and realized it didn’t apply to her life and therefor she was a member of an out-group and didn’t like it. She appealed to her direct authority (Dad) during breakfast and like a dad he had her address her own problem. She wrote the letter with him advising only on the structure of a complaint letter: This is my problem and this is my solution. The role of a dad is to make you no longer need him.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 05:59 PM
5

A part of Canada that doesn’t have building codes which are hostile to unisex bathrooms, a human rights charter, has an absolutely tiny Walmart, and store managers who are free to not take direction from the corporate main office. I wonder why so many of us want more details?
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:48 AM
2

doesn’t give a fuck want Laura thinks Although he might disagree with her he certainly does give a fuck what she thinks and to suggest otherwise is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 10:34 AM
1

I’ve been to car shows that were more about women than that place which seems to exist for the sole purpose of highlighting their suspicious lack of femininity; it’s so suspicious that I wonder if the mods haven’t banned all the actual women for their expressions of femininity.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 03:41 PM
2

He doesn't look a screamer so he won't be a target in that way. Can you link me to where the UK government has this as their official policy?
/r/MensRights24/11/18 08:30 AM
9

Those choices also happen to align with their personal preferences and emotional self fulfillment but the tragedy of 77 cents is often framed otherwise. A better work/life balance for women comes at a cost their husband has to pay but why are we more honest in our assessment of his situation than hers? He’s a pig in slop as the primary provider but as a primary caregiver her’s is a tragic tale of woe and strife!
/r/MensRights24/11/18 02:45 AM
2

Was it written on a piece of paper stuck to the door? Those come off a door about as easily as they go on a door and everybody has the authority to put one up and the power take one down.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 12:30 AM
3

She’s right they are immature and the fact that they didn’t just walk out with the girls is evidence of it.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 11:59 PM
1

Why not participate in both? MRAs don’t demand a blood oath to hate feminism or anything like that - if you have an opinion on something present it and expect it to be challenged if another person disagrees. You might get another perspective on your idea, or they will, or the two of you can dismiss each other’s opinions because of entirely spurious reasons. I’m sure the same applies over at men’s lib, but from what I understand, you will need to be more political in your presentations to them. e…
/r/MensRights23/11/18 10:40 PM
2

He’s a publically identified homosexual being returned to a nation where it’ll be near impossible for him to meet your requirements for keeping himself safe.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 06:15 PM
5

And yet if a conservative said half of that shit about Peruvian men it would confirm their racism.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 06:02 PM
3

That’s how racism and sexism works. The problem is, that typical of bigots, these offenders refuse the title they earned by spouting sexist or racist stereotypes. If you want to spew garbage about all people sharing common traits than stand by the title you earned and accept all of the majesty that comes with it. Yes, you are a bad person and the only distinction between you and those other people is the victim of your prejudice.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 03:24 PM
7

The national organization for women lobbies against shared parenting and divorce reform. So your premise that fighting feminism isn’t directly related to fighting for men’s rights is naive.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 06:41 PM
42

What’s that word that people use to describe a person who demands that others obey their social regimentation or face forcible suppression? Oh, right... Fascist.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 10:49 AM
1

Toxic masculinity is not about helping men. How does a group of masculine women reconcile their inability to access total masculinity with their belief that gender is a social construct? They convince themselves that the parts of masculinity that they can’t assimilate are toxic! Toxic masculinity permits feminists to ignore their own inherent gender differences to maintain their theory that gender is a social construct. Oh, and while gender is a social construct, the ideal gender is obviously th…
/r/MensRights22/11/18 10:36 AM
3

You are correct. The US travel advisory states: Kenyan penal code criminalizes “carnal knowledge against the order of nature,” which is interpreted to prohibit consensual same-sex sexual activity, and specifies a maximum penalty of 14 years’ imprisonment. A separate statute specifically criminalizes sex between men and specifies a maximum penalty of 21 years’ imprisonment. They make a distinction for men and it carries a harsher punishment.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 08:29 AM
6

They are giving advice to an admitted criminal.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 03:21 AM
4

I googled it too and found that gay sex carries a 5 to 14 year sentence. Those refuge gays who recently participated in a gay pride event fear for their lives. Yeah, Kenya doesn’t have death squads activity hunting gays down but to say that it’s safe haven isn’t exactly accurate.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 11:41 PM
2

You mean the masculinity that society forces on effeminate men since a masculine man isn’t asked to increase his already masculine masculinity. Have you not noticed that toxic masculinity begins with the aspects of masculinity that are beyond the reach of masculine women? A masculine woman still retains a level of femininity that is most agreeable to the masculinity of effeminate men. The concept of toxic masculinity isn’t about helping men it’s about promoting the idea that ‘proper’ masculinity…
/r/MensRights21/11/18 09:36 PM
1

Women had a strong influence over those men the entire time so this terrible life of hiding in caves from beasts at night and owning only what we can seize and defend is also on women. Women’s traditional power was their capacity or ability to influence the behavior of others or the course of events.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:14 PM
5

I like how this person believes chivalry is a reward that ‘trash’ must aspire to earn instead of a system that confirms the inequality of women.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 06:41 PM
17

And then: ‘Judges have no place in rape trials. They simply can’t be trusted’
/r/MensRights21/11/18 05:42 PM
11

Protection laws that limited women were not the result of evil men being power hungry oppressive jerks they were the result of women asking for special protections above and beyond the standard for men. Note that this issue is being highlighted by UN Women (a women’s equality entity) as something bad instead of a celebratory achievement for women’s equality and any government policy to come from it will be prohibitive to women placing themselves in danger. The guided cages women historically liv…
/r/MensRights21/11/18 05:11 PM
2

White supremacy is mostly used as a tool for socially challenged whites to access friendships by bonding over their dislike of other ethnic people by relating all sorts of undesirable traits to those people. The toxicity of that woman’s femininity was related to her appeal to authority to take action and force those men to change their behaviour to accommodate her personal comfort more than her wearing a sexy outfit but for you the toxicity is related to the writer’s expectation that the woman c…
/r/MensRights21/11/18 03:00 AM
2

The main problem isn’t men’s lack of emotional expression it’s mostly men’s physical and emotional isolation from their family unit during a crisis. A man finds emotional stability in his mate and their children together and that dynamic can’t be substituted with any other people.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:32 PM
1

By who? By me when I exploit your sexually undesirable traits to highlight my abundance of sexually desirable traits. Sure, women set the standards but it’s men who have to meet those standards in competition to reproduce with their best person they can attract and the same applies to women.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:06 PM
2

They do because those words don’t apply to the men who are already predisposed to be manly. They are spoken to men not exhibiting manliness.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 06:42 PM
2

Financial independance... if men were inclined to strive for just financial independence they’d be ineligible marriage material to most women. Luckily for the race, men are inclined to and still expected to pay for an entire family - not just themselves. Why is this significant? Well, it turns out that when presented with their current unlimited options women have a disgusting habit of being inclined to adopt the awful slavery attributed to the caregiver role over the provider role... Women are …
/r/MensRights20/11/18 02:19 AM
-2

Taking something seriously... It doesn’t take a hyper-masculine macho-man to understand that Ellen is a comedian and she’s doing what comedians do. It’s a gag and although it’s not a very funny one for me I can at least acknowledge that it’s comedy. She’s not a public policy under a mandate to respect civil rights - she’s a comedian! What was the name of that comedian who made those rape jokes a few years back and some folks had a hissy fit? Remember when Dave Chappell was criticized for parts o…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 11:23 PM
-8

Is becoming effeminate men a part of that?
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:10 PM
-6

Suppose for a moment that men facilitating women was a normal part of human sex selection. Suppose for a minute that men are less inclined to permitting serious emotions into rendering us inactive. Suppose for a moment that by following their natural inclinations most men receive internal and external rewards and benefits that are usually more beneficial than they are harmlful. These people are exhibiting masculinity and it’s getting in the way of your politics in the same manner as women exhibi…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:06 PM
4

TLDR: don’t blame her she’s just a girl! In reality, she fucked over a bunch of people to buy luxury handbags and now she’s fucking over her co-conspirators to get out of trouble.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 02:11 PM
5

That’s because, as a soldier, you aren’t smart enough to understand the nuances of capital letters and their impact on your future success. You’re most likely oblivious to terribly dangerous situations like possible micro aggressions directed at you, the delicate implications of your majority/minority status regarding the company you are in at any given time, and the stifling status of your observable racial traits whether the positive and/or negative stereotypes associated with it apply to you …
/r/MensRights18/11/18 11:09 PM
14

Women are just as good as men! ...but we can afford to let women go at twice the turnover as men. Women are just as good as men! ...but they don’t have to meet the higher standards that we expect from men. Let’s overcompensate for this glaring problem: https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/evewoman/article/2001303024/did-you-know-that-women-are-really-stronger-than-men https://www.forbes.com/sites/travisbradberry/2016/06/21/why-women-are-smarter-than-men/1 http://time.com/5049887/women-fitter-than-men…
/r/MensRights18/11/18 07:32 PM
0

Yesterday I had dry cereal for breakfast but today I had hot cereal. I made different choices at different times because of different outcomes but what I’ve never had for breakfast is a pot roast and although you might find a minority of people who’ve had a pot roast they’re a minority not the majority and it would be unusual to point to them as the national standard. Most kids are born to two loving parents who typically adhere to masculine and feminine family roles and that’s largely because i…
/r/MensRights18/11/18 05:28 PM
1

What country and region do you live in?
/r/MensRights18/11/18 04:48 PM
1

I’m arguing that typically they are supplemented by a specific man, their husband, not all men, and it’s the baby years that suddenly alters male and female income trajectories. ‘Couples make choices’ that result in a division of family roles which determines which partner has the job with lower financial renumeration. Unsurprisingly, social assistance is also often related to that same baby/income trajectory which also applies to many single fathers.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 02:54 PM
1

She’s more offended by the notion of the caregiver expressing gratitude to the provider for adopting caregiver roles than the crass recommendation for expressing that gratitude.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 10:33 PM
0

Disappointing.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:54 PM
3

Not the people who earn their living on that narrative who are also the same people who present the stats and inform the government and public. Keeping the cycle of violence cyclic is an integral part of their business strategy and by focusing on only one group as damsels in distress it ensures future violence.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 07:38 PM
0

You follow up my comment with a rush to judgement derived from your failure to conduct a proper investigation? You are either a brilliant satirist or a disappointing idiot.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 07:05 PM
2

Yep, with my wife being a stay at home mom I’m able to earn more than the national family average, so although she doesn’t pay taxes herself - ‘we’ are paying more than the average. With me earning twice the family average, and my wife earning zero, we are also significantly increasing the gender wage gap. There’s also a hint of supremacy to this that irks me - as I said, I earn more than the national average, so what is the insinuation we are making for anyone who makes less than me?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 06:03 PM
0

Most people think that and they also think that police conduct impartial investigations.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:57 PM
1

Are you folks really surprised that a magazine for effeminate men has a somewhat ‘masculine’ female as an example of the archetypal male?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:54 PM
6

With facts, the reasons behind the wage gap and this are the exact same so neither of them are remarkable unless you’re explaining these issues to people using them for political purposes. Wage gap! Grrrr men! Well, actually... tax gap! Grrrr women! Well, actually...
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:42 PM
7

Allow divorced fathers to parent their kids with regularity so that their children can develop a full perspective on masculinity?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 07:43 PM
22

Look at those men soaking up all of the manufacturing jobs so that poor women are forced to take tending and socialization careers and although it allows them to retain their femininity while earning money - that’s not the point, the point is: they’re the victims of oppression.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 06:15 PM
1

American males prefer deodorants to antiperspirants so the lucky students who have class with them are always treated to bold sophisticated scents of underarm freshness.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 05:36 PM
15

Trygold... for the last time, you don’t have to take off your underwear to change into your gym shorts... just take your pants off and put your shorts on...
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:01 PM
2

That poster was created in March 1915 in response to the German Army’s ‘atrocities’ in their invasion of Belgium. Propagandizing those ‘atrocities’ allowed the government to convey to average men why they should support the war effort more clearly than an assasination of an Arch Duke and his wife.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:34 PM
2

watching a crime He’s not a bystander - he was charged with criminal conspiracy which means they planned the abuse earlier and then executed it - her actions of abuse are then also his actions of abuse as if he did them himself. All of the abuse counts against him and since he has prior arrests - it’s apples and oranges.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 08:07 AM
1

Who doesn’t like sandwiches?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:51 AM
0

Yep, but that doesn’t mean he’s disabled in all the ways a person can be disabled or that he’s susceptible to suggestion beyond the range of other teenage boys.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:39 AM
0

What power does that scrawny young girl have to possess a teenaged boy to exhibit his totally awesome super power of endurance to tough or unfavorable conditions? I suspect his own ambition which is the only reason why we don’t have equality of responsibility in our society. Hey, did you notice his machismo competitor also exhibiting his endurance to tough and unfavourable conditions by wearing a T-shirt toss a rock at him?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:21 AM
1

I said he was a co-conspirator or his own primary offender so I don’t know where you get off suggesting that I’m defending her actions. No child will... take all the shot out of a shot gun shell and blast strangers walking down the street? perform a shunt that breaks their leg or fractures their skull? Take a car someone left running outside a store for a joyride? Those are serious crimes and injuries and you think a kid sitting in a cold puddle on a dare is not possible? Lol! Was your father th…
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:16 AM
-1

He has cerebral palsy which sometimes makes a person a delayed learner but you probably wouldn’t notice it by interacting with them. I don’t think his behaviour is a problem associated with cerebral palsy more than him being a teenager caught on camera doing something other people will blow out of proportion. Everyone involved was under the age of consent so... I don’t think pedo applies.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 07:48 PM
1

There were sound effects, puppetry, and silly voiced one-sided monologues about my disappointment of their anarchy in the face of my absolute authority when I did it. It had it’s moments.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 07:14 PM
3

The much-maligned but longstanding idea that women enjoy discussing their emotions while men are mostly excited by cars may be true after all. Here let me gender equalize that for them: The much-maligned but longstanding idea that women are hysterical while men are mostly excited by cars may be true after all. If they are going to be assholes is it too much to ask for them to be gender balanced assholes?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 02:30 PM
3

Why single out women on this? Everybody:is more likely to be abusive to men.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 02:05 PM
5

First impression watching that video: It looks like a stunt to me. First article: He seems more upset about the video being spread around than he is about the event itself and it looks like she’s waiting for him to get out of the water on the other side of the bank... what bully does that? After reading more into it: Sure enough he was dared to do it. He’s a high school Johnny Knoxville except his mother got involved so now he’s a victim of horrible people instead of a co-conspirator at best or …
/r/MensRights14/11/18 01:58 PM
1

He provided you with the people you will financially and socially burden as a needy old man.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:56 PM
1

From what I recall in the province of lower Canada (now called Quebec) women were voting in federal elections prior to the federal law prohibiting it.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:25 PM
1

I’m guessing the owners don’t want to spook the current leadership so they call it ‘masculinity contests’ instead of the more appropriate ‘leadership contests’. If people in the same company are exhibiting independent leadership traits you need to promote them or get them better leaders who can build cohesion.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 10:47 PM
0

Typically men are not paralyzed from taking action because of fear, especially an absurd fear like the one in the article. I’ve said nothing in this regard. Your following point on self-preservation agrues against you...
/r/MensRights12/11/18 09:53 PM
2

Guess who got her PHD in classics at Princeton? Some folks refuse to feel guilty about wasting their parent’s money so they are often seen forcing square pegs into round holes.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 09:33 PM
1

It wasn’t just jobs - women’s suffrage in my country was also a ‘hodge podge mix’ where in one area women were voting nationally and another they weren’t allowed and all up until a national law in the late 1800’s was passed prohibiting them completely. So, in some areas, women were prohibited from voting for a period of at most thirty years, which is bad, but it’s not the since man walked upright narrative we’re getting beaten over the head with.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 09:15 PM
6

If I remember correctly, the first one to complain is the victim.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:31 PM
1

Entire families often joined dad on the job so your ‘reality’ of dad marching out the front door to workhorse himself into exploitation and disposability applied to every member of his family. It’s only been in our recent past that laws ‘protected’ women and children from working. This was the reality back then, men worked, women worked, children worked, and all were exploited and discarded when not needed.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:27 PM
25

They idealise a model that erases much of the social progress that has been made in the last 2,000 year. We want fathers to have the right to see their kids after a divorce not to raid Londinium for plunder and enslave it’s inhabitants. We don’t want to erase social progress we want more social progress.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 02:26 PM
1

https://japantoday.com/category/national/man-revives-woman-with-aed-but-branded-pervert-for-removing-her-clothes-to-apply-electrode-pads It also a widespread internet ‘ask the experts’ question.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 01:41 PM
3

The removal of a woman’s clothes particularly the bra before using a defibrillator seems to be the largest source of the problem but I’ve never heard of of it going beyond the complainer getting an education from the police.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 10:27 PM
1

The current over-abundance of female teachers, nurses, and business assistants, and stay at home parents is due to women ‘abandoning’ the traits of femininity? It would seem that the vast majority of women with free will tend to still gravitate to jobs that allow them to both make money and observe their feminine inclinations. The wage gap is largely due to women’s own femininity not exploitation. The lack of women in STEM is largely due to women’s femininity not prohibition. The lack of women i…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 08:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter