TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

v8beetle Archive

View 39 posts and 355 comments by v8beetle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
169

Generalv8beetle/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:37 AM
91

v8beetle/r/MensRights10/11/14 08:00 PM
63

Ragebaitv8beetle/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:36 PM
61

Fathers/Custodyv8beetle/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:12 PM
47

Action Op.v8beetle/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:18 PM
43

Newsv8beetle/r/MensRights02/03/15 09:04 PM
27

v8beetle/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:23 AM
25

v8beetle/r/MensRights24/10/14 08:14 PM
22

Marriage/Divorcev8beetle/r/MensRights04/05/15 11:01 PM
19

Newsv8beetle/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:04 PM
13

Social Issuesv8beetle/r/MensRights18/06/15 11:36 PM
13

Legal Rightsv8beetle/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:07 AM
13

False Accusationsv8beetle/r/MensRights27/12/14 10:24 PM
11

Social Issuesv8beetle/r/MensRights18/06/15 10:28 PM
10

Activism/Supportv8beetle/r/MensRights30/04/15 06:59 PM
9

Activism/Supportv8beetle/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:52 PM
8

Discussionv8beetle/r/MensRights07/04/15 03:14 AM
8

Activism/Supportv8beetle/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:14 AM
8

Questionv8beetle/r/MensRights10/10/14 06:35 PM
7

Analysisv8beetle/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:25 PM
7

v8beetle/r/MensRights09/10/14 06:42 PM
7

Questionv8beetle/r/MensRights17/03/15 10:55 PM
7

v8beetle/r/MensRights18/04/15 03:36 PM
7

Action Op.v8beetle/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:11 PM
6

Discussionv8beetle/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:29 AM
5

v8beetle/r/MensRights17/10/14 08:50 PM
5

Newsv8beetle/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:52 PM
5

Storyv8beetle/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:41 PM
5

Discussionv8beetle/r/MensRights13/10/14 02:36 PM
5

Questionsv8beetle/r/MensRights02/06/15 03:36 AM
4

Storyv8beetle/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:35 PM
3

Newsv8beetle/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:13 AM
3

v8beetle/r/MensRights17/12/14 03:57 AM
1

Edu./Occu.v8beetle/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:20 AM
1

v8beetle/r/MensRights14/11/14 05:04 PM
1

Blogs/Videov8beetle/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:15 PM
1

Activism/Supportv8beetle/r/MensRights25/05/15 07:43 AM
1

Activism/Supportv8beetle/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:16 AM
1

v8beetle/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:40 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The response Milo should have given to Rebecca is exemplified in the following video. All he need do is cite the David Reimer case for both Gender Identity and circumcision. Dr. John Money is largely responsible for the prevailing mindset on the fluidity of 'gender identity.' Dr. Money was nothing more than a modern day Dr. Frankenstein with pedophillic tendencies and was allowed to operate with impunity under the guise of a professional. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUTcwqR4Q4Y
/r/MensRights03/12/15 03:55 PM
1

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/245/366/case.html “It may not be doubted that the very conception of a just government and its duty to the citizen includes the reciprocal obligation of the citizen to render military service in case of need, and the right to compel it. … To do more than state the proposition is absolutely unnecessary in view of the practical illustration afforded by the almost universal legislation to that effect now in force.” This was in 1917. SCOTUS challenge to th…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 12:30 AM
2

The poster is real, and it came from Coastal Carolina University. Look at the icon in the lower right hand corner, here: https://www.facebook.com/avoiceformalestudents/photos/a.487147964691217.1073741829.397863420286339/859235884149088/?type=1&__mref=message_bubble
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:57 AM
3

I wonder if they missed this article. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/svjfry12.pdf
/r/MensRights10/07/15 11:23 PM
2

Give her ignorant behind something to think about. Sascha Murillo "There is no comparison between older women hitting on younger men and older men taking advantage of younger gals." So the fact that adolescent boys are typically less emotionally and cognitively mature than girls as demonstrated by MRI scans of their brains is irrelevant? Cases such as Nick Olivas, Vili Fualaau, or Nathaniel J forced now to pay child support are ok as demonstrated by this? http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/vie…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:26 AM
4

I do also, as well as his reinstatement. This continued deluded portrayal of women's violence as well as men's is unacceptable. Already sent a couple of relevant things to the dean of students regarding this, but don't know if I want to get involved with the prosecutor. I think the prosecutor should recuse himself though based on this: http://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/local/2014/09/08/meggs-daughter-beaten-in-violent-lcso-run-in/15297145/
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:22 PM
5

Choosing to raise her fist signaled an escalation that he was well within his rights to defend which he did by restraining her which she then took as an escalation to which she felt justified to strike him and he struck back in defense. These clowns couldn't be any more idiotic by suspending him as it does nothing but reinforce the notion that you can threaten someone, punch them and they are to take it if they're a guy and you're a woman. Wrong message to send.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:17 PM
1

People need to understand the fight or flight response. Men and women have different responses. Many don't unfortunately. Read this: http://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/understanding-the-stress-response I saw her being aggressive first, and repeatedly so until she was slapped back after she hit first. Also of significance is that the moment she spun around with a clenched fist in his line of sight, that signals an escalation. To deny that is beyond stupid. Ever hear the expression that…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 02:08 AM
7

Send these to your cousin, they're sourced. http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1253721 http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1254228 She'll be the one who ends up looking like a fool. No offense.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 09:33 PM
3

She's just ticked she got caught playing both sides of the feminist argument while feigning innocence so she's now trying to malign the movement with SPLC citations, a radfem blog, and of all things, Wikipedia that anyone can edit. Potok is going to refute her absurd contention. It's already in the works. Going to make her look more idiotic than she already does, as does her counsel.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 06:44 PM
1

This is a link to a rough U.S. estimate I tabulated with sources. The only remaining calculation would be to separate out the married and unmarried men from the figures as married men pay far more in support given presumptive parent laws. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/30lzaq/assistance_regarding_title_ivd_title_iva/ This could be done for every country of course with the same model to get a very conservative estimate. There is a lot of money in play and my gut says that's why they …
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:28 PM
1

The 2012 convictions, he was with her. Even if not related necessarily to the kid, we can't be sure, and do not know who the instigator was, which given the video, I'd think it reasonable to assume she was. My gut is telling me that in those instances, she'd initiate as is consistent with Capaldi, Whitaker, then he'd retaliate and she'd call the cops or someone else would and he'd get arrested which is consistent with Hines.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 09:44 PM
2

If they mutually claimed DV and both had records Protecting a child by physically interjecting isn't DV. That's part of the misconception feminist academics like to constantly portray. If he's protecting his kid from violence with violence that's natural law in action. To characterize it as anything other than protective behavior is to do a disservice to men and fathers who have the same instinctive protective behaviors mothers do typically. That's all I'm saying. That's why context is important…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 04:07 PM
2

We don't know the context of his record though. How do we know it's not him physically interjecting while she's going off then being charged for it? We don't. I'm still having the reporter look into that also.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:56 PM
5

Yea, there's a lot of denial going on. I'm still conversing with the reporter. I'll make sure she has the proper information such as shelters and such denying male victims.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:37 PM
1

Yea, she got off exceptionally lenient given the litany of charges she faced (check the charges on the Pennsylvania court records site.) It will be under the common pleas court docket. Something is really wrong here. That a neighbor had reported it previously and nothing happened really pisses me off as well.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 12:14 AM
1

Have already spoken to a reporter from WBRE who is checking further into this event.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:42 PM
8

I'm still searching for the court records. I have her name, and have checked where this occurred but there are no records. I'm calling the clerk of court and the DA tomorrow. Couldn't today due to Flag day. I swear, they conjure more crap to not work in this country than anywhere I've seen.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:24 AM
21

I know all the involved parties (not personally,) and if I have anything to do with it I'll get that prosecutor fired for the horrendous plea deal. There's no way in hell that woman should be on the streets. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so3xqVnWRQw&feature=youtu.be
/r/MensRights16/06/15 01:56 AM
3

Beware though, she's got some errors by citing that feminists will fix anything related to this, but it's an interesting read nonetheless.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:39 AM
4

lol touche
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:01 PM
9

Just because someone has a degree doesn't make them smart for god's sake. Some of the most educated people I know are absolute idiots.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:41 PM
1

I'd agree there's a positive correlation but would say the higher correlation is likely to be cases where good dads are summarily alienated from their children by a vindictive controlling maliciously unrepentant and unpunished mother whose behavior is reinforced by a system that does nothing to make her comply with visitation schedules such as Texas where penal code 25.03 routinely goes unenforced.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:28 PM
1

It says backdated right in the article. Backdated is what it is. I sent the article for you to read.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:22 PM
2

"On November 7 a letter arrived for Mr Sandywell which was asking for £11,000 - more than he had previously been told to pay." Daily mail has an article too. It was backdated, as in retroactive. At least that's how the Daily Mail article reads. https://archive.is/oLXS4
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:19 PM
3

Someone across the pond needs to get the crown prosecutor a copy of the book entitled, "Female Sexual Abuse of Children: The Ultimate Taboo," by fellow U.K. resident and child psychologist Dr. Michele Elliott. Also realize this is the mirror opposite of the 'licentious man' issue that first wavers sought to address when readdressing 'age-of-consent' laws denoted in Dr. Estelle Freedman's book, "Redefining Rape," in which they worried a girl getting pregnant would descend into a life of prostitut…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:07 PM
1

The one I got was 2012 but looks the same, just different publication dates.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:12 AM
1

Dutton does have a 2012 paper to counter this one, but I can't get access to it without paying for it. Dutton, D.G. (2012) The case against the role of gender in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal 17 (1), 99-104.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:55 AM
1

Yea, I saw that. I hope he sues the living hell out of that agency as it is their damned job to practice due diligence. Instead, some lazy ass bureaucrat decided to be derelict in their duties.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 03:17 AM
1

Well, she's smart and beautiful. Dangerous combination.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 10:58 PM
3

This is a better, more informative link. http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/father-gets-7-800-bill-after-reuniting-with-long-lost-daughter-1.2400382
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:49 PM
1

Those stats are so misleading about the deaths of women. Where is the context that feminists so readily demand when women use violence? How do we know that the deaths of those women weren't precipitated by abusive threatening women, and battered spouse syndrome? Simply put, we don't know the entire context and need to if we're to eliminate these outcomes. Edit for clarification: Just as women get up in court and claim battered spouse syndrome to defend themselves from 'years of abuse,' should we…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 06:49 PM
3

Nice she can assume men have no concept of being raped given the statistics.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 10:11 PM
1

By that time, my sister had just gotten used to feeling safer with another person in bed with her, and it took a long while to get her to feel safe alone. I understand different places have different social norms, but above gets right to where I was headed in that it demonstrates an unhealthy attachment. Right and wrong are just words, as are healthy and unhealthy. To get a person to realize their full potential behaviors such as you mention need to be limited. It stunts people's emotional growt…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 09:08 PM
1

Oh I know, and I'm aware of that, and some states have expanded to include that, but academics such as Koss are explicitly against it. We won't get the count if academics stonewall the change in definition. Feminists will vehemently oppose it. https://soundcloud.com/889-wers/male-rape
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:14 PM
1

Well, we're talking about academic as opposed to legal definitions. The FBI legal definition relies on 'penetration,' which is also the primary definition in academia. Some states have gone beyond that in their legal statutes, but there's still no clear consensus which is what I'm trying to address not only in academia but other professional disciplines. You'd have to look up Seattle, Washington laws. And I'm not sure how it was plead down to "attempted rape" given she was on top of him. I'm won…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:06 PM
1

That also depends on the states definitions. There was a case out of Seattle where a lady broke into a guy's house in the middle of the night and 'raped' him. She was charged with rape. The best demonstration of the offset prevalence is the 2010 CDC NISVS. They had to create a new category which demotes and trivializes the experience in part due to Mary Koss' influence. It's indefensible what they've done to be frank.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 07:56 PM
1

Right, that's not included which greatly reduces female prevalence in the statistical count. Talk about confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 07:49 PM
2

Yes, they do have differing definitions which is one of the biggest damned problems we face. How the hell can we fight, or stop something that's so ridiculously disparately defined across the states? We can't.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 06:01 PM
3

You're still incorrect as the definition still relies on 'penetration' which isn't the primary sexual function of women. Yes, this is another topic in my paper, so. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/recent-program-updates/new-rape-definition-frequently-asked-questions A: The old definition was “The carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will.” Many agencies interpreted this definition as excluding a long list of sex offenses that are criminal in most jurisdictions, such as offe…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 05:32 PM
1

You sure seem to want to defend her for some reason instead of look at this objectively, and quite frankly, I've tried to be patient with you and explain that I'm only looking at the older behaviors and expanded the scenario with the 'pebbles,' but now you want to suggest that I'm accusing her of lying in addition to making things up when I'm merely looking at her own admissions to the behaviors in question? Can you not be objective? You also seem to want to find excuses to 'mitigate' Dunham's c…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 05:18 PM
1

I would agree that the closer the child was to the two year boundary would increase the likelihood, but we don't know that for certain. Without asking the probative questions we'll never know. That's why I look at this in a different, more critical way.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 04:06 PM
0

I'm not sure parenting articles which would likely be opinion pieces could speak to prevalence of this behavior as they'd be merely anecdotal recollections. I'm not completely unaware to children exploring their own bodies. I'm merely challenging the assertion that a 1 year old stuffed rocks, or pebbles into their orifice. Knowing what I do about their physical and mental abilities, this strikes me as something a toddler closer to 2-3 would do due to their improved mobility (range of motion) as …
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:50 PM
1

As I said, I've raised 5 children. No one year old has the mental capacity or physical ability to stick rocks in their own vagina. A one year old? No, not ever have I seen such an occurrence. Older is more likely, say 3-5, but not a 1 year old. So if she didn't put the rocks in there herself, how did they get in there? Simple answer would be Lena put them in there.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:41 PM
1

Tell me something. What 1 year old puts rocks inside their vagina? I don't think you and others are thinking critically about this and are instead reacting from an emotional level that someone would question the behaviors. But really think about that for a moment before answering. There isn't a 1 year old on the planet I'm aware of with the requisite dexterity or presence of mind to accomplish that task.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:18 PM
0

I've seen girls as young as 9 enter puberty. However, I think to what you're referring would be occasional or sporadic, and not a regular nightly occurrence. Those are two entirely different things. I'm sure that in some pockets of our populace, depending on socioeconomic status, that it does still happen but I wouldn't go so far as to call it "normal." I'm also surprised your parents would thrust you into the parental role at that age. But that's a different conversation.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:13 PM
1

I don't need a description necessarily of what Duggar did as I've already read up on it and conceded the point that it was in fact consistent with knowledge I, and many others would conclude fit the definition of molestation. I also alluded to the widespread academic disagreement which is readily apparent in the professional academic literature. For you to say it's insensitive when looking at this from a scientific standpoint speaks to your lack of objectivity as well as emotional attachment to …
/r/MensRights23/05/15 06:04 AM
3

I think conflating is the wrong term. There is a way to look at both sets of behaviors over time, and both perpetrators and draw information from which to see where on the scale they fall. The bodily inspection part occurred when her sister was 1, Lena was 7, which some would contend is simple curiosity. I'm not moralizing about it. But let's get to the heart of the issue. Issues such as morality, judging right and wrong, are subjective and cannot by definition be objectively defined in scientif…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 05:15 AM
8

There is widespread academic disagreement as to what constitutes sexual abuse, and or crimes. That's just reality. When looking at what Duggar did, depending on the age of his victim and his age in relation to the other person, it could be, and would likely be construed as 'child's play,' or a 'crime,' which is heavily dependent on to whom it is reported. That's one of the things I'm addressing in my paper is to help establish a better consensus across not only academia but the counseling, medic…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 04:23 AM
10

Just thought I'd drop this link too guys, think about this. This would put Lena's behavior as a young child in a whole new light. http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/11/living/6-year-old-suspended-kissing-girl/
/r/MensRights23/05/15 01:20 AM
17

I'm just going to drop this link and say this; It's not wholly without merit to compare and contrast the two, particularly when Lena discussed behaviors that are absolutely consistent with the grooming patterns of sex offenders. Moreover, there has been a long history of concealing female perpetrators that will be only partially demonstrated by my link, but once my paper is finished and published will more than substantiate this was done at first wave feminist insistence, and has continued since…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 01:12 AM
4

The biggest impediment to 50/50 parenting time, in my opinion, isn't court bias per se, but that men tend to work longer and inflexible hours. Why should a child stay with dad every 2nd week if Dad isn't home until after 6? Families tend to enter the court system with Dad working long hours, and mom working short hours. Gee, did you ever think he makes that sacrifice because the money has to come from somewhere? Yet we then illogically punish him when mom refuses to step up her financial capacit…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 07:53 PM
4

Part of the issue around this behavior stems from how the age-of-consent laws were reshaped around the turn of the 20th century during the suffrage movement. In part, a girls virtue was seen as a monetary commodity. It was thought at the time that adolescent boys, not unlike today, were fully ready to undertake sex and its consequences. That is how the feminists/suffragettes were thinking about this when seeking to reshape the laws. Despite all we really knew, and have learned since I have some …
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:39 PM
3

This is why we need to coin a new phrase, "Emotional Rape," perpetrated under intentional deception and infidelity. And if we really want to get out there, every act of intercourse a husband and wife would have together after her infidelity would also be predicated on that deception. Would that not be rape by omission? Would we really want to sleep with them voluntarily without knowing what, if any, STD's they might have been infected with, or without knowing about their infidelity? This could o…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:11 PM
2

Suzanne Steinmetz too, per Straus literature.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:16 PM
6

No offense, but screw her alligator tears. She's crying because she knows she screwed up. What about his tears, his kids, his wife, his future all at her idiotic fingertips the moment she did what she did without the slightest evidence. Yes I know you were being sarcastic, but I just could give two craps about her tears.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:42 AM
3

The stats are too old. Nice that she used 20 year old stats to try and make a point. What, were there no recent ones?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:29 AM
1

Yea I oopsed.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:02 AM
1

Still new and learning. Thanks for the tip.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:10 PM
10

This was my comment to her. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LLePj1korQ!] Dr. Estelle Freedman discussing her book "Redefining Rape. You might want to watch the above as it's relevant to your article. This book sets the tone and demonstrates the evolution of rape laws and the double standards that have become modern day reality with the help of suffragettes/early feminists the world over. Rape, child abuse, and DV/IPV are all predicated on feminist theory, and all have another common thread, on…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:48 AM
1

Quote by Tennessee Claflin sister of Victoria Woodhull, leader of American Women's suffrage as well as first woman presidential candidate: "There are, undoubtedly, women who are weak and silly, and simple, and who are taken advantage of by designing men. Until we have such systems of education as will tend to prevent women from being weak, simple, and silly, it is undoubtedly right to have laws punishing seduction with the utmost severity; but we have also ... ninnies among men, and ought we not…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 02:51 PM
1

She has been outed, but has made her facebook private, or deleted it. It took me all of 3 minutes to find a cached page of the original post with the article from the daily mail.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:56 PM
1

He can sue on behalf of the damage caused to his family too as he wasn't the only one affected. Think his kids friends didn't see that picture? Think they're not going to face any fallout at school?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 09:27 AM
1

I did, it's in my comments. I can cite my sources again if need be, but look through my comments and you'll find it. Are you in the U.S.? If not, it wouldn't be difficult to make a conservative estimate with the median child support payment and birth rate annually.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:58 AM
1

The family (including the father) can get on welfare in most instances, but to my knowledge and experience, some ladies seem exempt from the job search requirements. I'm not sure why.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 01:01 PM
7

Yea, that whole issue makes me want to teach sailors how to really let the profanity roll. It's just a continued downplaying of women sexual deviants that dates back well over a century and recent evidence was the Mary Kay Letourneau interview by Barbara Walters who happens to be a feminist mind you. I wonder how much MKL was paid to go on national television and blame an 11 year old that she just so happened to start grooming in second grade instead of owning her behavior as a 34 year old woman…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:21 AM
6

Yea, their definition of help is men work women sit at home tending kids even when that's no longer needed in addition to never improving themselves or financially contributing to the family. But feminists are opposed to gender roles I thought, which includes of course women as child care, and men as breadwinners because of course that leads to financial abuse with only one bread winner. I swear this stuff just gets more and more bizarre and convoluted.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:00 AM
9

Exactly. This article illustrates that a man's only intrinsic value is that of a paycheck. If that's not reason enough to not ever get married then I sure don't know what the hell is.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 01:38 AM
12

This is by far the best comment I've seen thus far on the above article: " Mr. Joe from Toledo 11:51 AM CDT As I'm sure others have noted, how are men to blame if women are the ones bailing out of the marriage because their partner doesn't earn enough? Imagine a study that said 2/3 of all divorces are initiated by men because their wives got fat. Would you then say that women are the cause of 2/3rds of all divorces?" I was laughing my ass off because it rings so damned true. Talk about projectio…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 11:02 PM
1

That seems right. Florida bill is dead though.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:31 PM
2

That's gonna hurt some egos to say the least.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:04 PM
1

I wasn't trying to be too abrasive and I apologize for coming off like that as it was late but still that's no excuse. I just know from the last decade of reading that the literature is replete with examples from which to choose. I think the best place to start would be to decide what precisely you want to discuss pertaining to men's rights and work from there with an outline and citations.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:46 AM
1

I don't have faith that a woman who knowingly names the wrong man is going to be benevolent and relieve him of financial obligation as it conflicts with the 5th amendment of self incrimination should the state's then pursue charges against her for fraud. I can see profound legal implications here. I'm sure that's just one of many reasons state's aren't in a big hurry to deal with this. If state's do pursue fraud charges, what happens to the kids?
/r/MensRights01/05/15 02:40 AM
2

Can't get blood from a turnip, also the Bradley Amendment ensures he can't get out of the child support obligation retroactively. If the state is unwilling to forego future obligations even with DNA proof, then he's screwed six different ways from Sunday.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 01:38 AM
3

I also remember the "psychological parent," arguments being touted by mainly female "experts" or "lawmakers" and it just sickened me. I wanted to smash something so bad. I made calls to the bills sponsoring legislator and even contacted the opposition with a conservative estimate of yearly costs of paternity fraud. This will come to a head and be dealt with and god help any legislator on the wrong side of it. Their motive is money. How much will it cost the states unless they keep defrauded dads…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 01:16 AM
6

lol too funny.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 12:33 AM
2

I'd be interested in seeing that calculation.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:36 PM
1

Get hold of your legislators in these states via email and get involved. Let them know where you stand on this issue. Don't say you want shared parenting while doing nothing to actively engage the political process.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:23 PM
1

I'm not against hitting either (within reason) and not to be conflated with going absolutely off the deep end, but at the same time, I, like you, acknowledge some did indeed go too far. When context isn't listened to by police on scene and arrests are made regardless of mitigating circumstances it seems evident that those in power haven't the slightest clue about what is or isn't legally permitted.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:03 PM
7

Yes, they did the same in North Dakota as well. Also, DV/IPV advocate groups were also involved as were feminist groups. As I've said numerous times even the "professionals" the researchers can't get on the same page as evidenced by the 40 year DV debate. Until that is resolved as well as penalties for things like lying about abuse in divorce courts, I don't see a lot of movement on this or Alimony reform because feminists will oppose it and their political clout is vast to say the least.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 08:35 PM
11

I remember watching some of the hearings about this. I recall specifically a female legislator acting as if it was a crime to paternity test a child due to the unknown conditions under which the child's DNA was collected and tested. I wanted to scream at my monitor at the level of idiocy of an elected elder representative, but it would have done no good. Do you have any specifics with regard to what groups are so vehemently opposed to the disestablishment of paternity? We should be rifling throu…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 07:18 PM
1

I don't have the answer either, and neither do the "professionals" in whom we place so much emphasis to define concepts like abuse. Some people do still do military school as well as I recall schools dealing with troubled adolescents, but they're no more certain or successful in dealing with this. I look at it like this, why pay someone else to abuse my child because abuse does happen in these places. Youth boot camps have had several issues as do group homes. I think it's ironic that these plac…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 06:53 PM
10

Sounds like we should be supporting Mr. Lee and digging into the political ties of those who opposed the shared provision measure to expose them.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 05:26 PM
3

If anything this will drive all men out of post secondary education altogether. Men's only colleges have been infiltrated and accused of being sexist while women only colleges have been allowed to proliferate.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 05:14 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, I was pissed, but I grew up for 8 of my first 12 years in group homes and such due to abuse, so I tried to be different with my kids. I tried to make sure they knew where the line was, but apparently it didn't take with my son as he's obstinate beyond reason at times. I love him, but don't really wanna hurt him that bad and yet I fear he will run his mouth to the wrong person and they will make an absolute mess of all 95 pounds of him. I won't lie, yea, I wanted to kick his a…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 04:16 PM
2

http://ncfm.org/ is in San Diego. Is that south enough? I'll come back and edit this in the morning with as many links as I can, including citing research and what not. But if you don't want to wait, check out Dr. Don Dutton, Dr. Denise Hines, Dr. Deborah Capaldi, Dr. Daniel Whitaker. Also get the book "Redefining rape," by Dr. Estelle Freedman to understand who shaped not only rape/sexual assault laws over the last 150 years, but child abuse laws and domestic violence. Additionally, you can go …
/r/MensRights30/04/15 05:39 AM
4

There are still very many people who don't believe women can rape men, yourself included. Evidence of such can be seen in every statutory rape case with a female teacher male student. Evidence can also be seen by the Seattle woman who broke into a mans house in the middle of the night and straddled him as he was sleeping. http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/woman-pleads-not-guilty-to-rape-of-man-in-seattle/ Or this, http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/09/05/woman-charged-with-raping-man-bond-s…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:17 AM
3

I'm against all rapes in all forms. Problem is, it's still rather sexistly defined in academia and in some states. Even issues like sibling sexual abuse is remarkably downplayed in academia and disagreed upon. Some think sibling incest is roughly 5 times as prevalent as parent child sexual abuse. Look to cases like Lena Dunham for instance. Until we can define these things more clearly and consistently across the academic and legal statutes the victim tally will continue to rise. Equally importa…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 02:49 AM
2

I've not seen anything specific mentioned yet, but I'd hope that we're against both of those as well. We know prison rape is a huge issue that is being addressed on many fronts legislatively if you look. Some though are resistant to implementing new plans citing cost issues. I just can't recall at the moment where I saw that but I'm thinking Texas prisons. I think most egalitarians want both behaviors addressed and stopped by both sexes, nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 02:43 AM
1

I made another comment on a thread relating to this same topic. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/347axo/praised_as_mother_of_the_year_for_beating_up_son/ This is an equality issue for men in that if a man were to do this it would be called abuse. I gave a specific example on the other thread and could give another. When my young adult son discovered I trashed his weed that I forbid him to use in my home he then proceeded to get a large kitchen knife, ya know, the big one, and said "To…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 02:02 AM
2

http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV150.pdf This is by Denise Hines and David Finkelhor. Even Hines says more research needs to be done.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:37 PM
3

When trying to corral my son who had been using drugs as an adolescent a few years ago, a nosey ass woman interjected into the situation without even knowing what was going on, or the motivation and said do I need to call the police. I brought it up because in that instance I had to explain my actions as a man as they're automatically questioned. What this woman did would be called abuse if a man did it. Of that I have absolutely no doubt. I felt I should add, that at no time did I hit my child,…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:31 PM
2

Yea, I love how they use their medical ethics to perpetrate a fraud and deception. I swear the lunacy never ends. When I spoke to a population geneticist, he informed me that is one way in which samples are taken to gauge prevalence of paternity fraud, but I told him it's likely a bad way given the rarity of some genetic issues.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:56 PM
1

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:06 PM
7

You should check out the book "Redefining Rape," by Dr. Estelle Freedman. You're absolutely right in that feminists claim to care, but their actions suggest to the contrary as they're the ones who took ownership of the laws and definitions more than a century ago. Also check out the Vagina Monologues controversy that got a student reporter fired in 2000 for criticising the lesbian rape of a 13 year old girl plied with alcohol.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:11 PM
1

Could you expand on that as I'm not clear to what you mean. Or perhaps you mean we are tolerating it to which my response would be why aren't we flooding legislators with emails and calls to confront paternity fraud, or request DNA tests at birth? Why aren't we confronting presumptive parent laws as well as the Bradley Amendment" in the U.S. at least? I'm unfamiliar with other countries laws but I know what needs done here in the U.S.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:21 PM
9

I don't think that you and others do understand. The mother in this instance and similar instances rob men of that choice to be involved by concealing the infidelity. It's contrived by the very deception she employed. That's why I use the word rape. Do you honestly think that had he known he'd have stayed in her and the child's life? He might have, he might not, but that was his choice. The article didn't expound on whether or not he left the child (now 17) he was deceived into raising. But even…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:54 PM
1

Yea, denial is not a feminists best friend, or perhaps it is just outright delusion.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:17 PM
11

Maybe lying cheating women shouldn't emotionally and financially rape men and instead should own their shit as GWW suggests which I vehemently agree with. That our state and federal lawmakers sanction this should tell you exactly who is a second class citizen. It sure as hell isn't women.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:11 PM
6

That will work so long as dudes don't forget to remove the cash first. Credit cards can always be replaced.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:59 PM
27

That doesn't surprise me. I wonder what feminized countries are like also. I know this is likely to sound over the top, but I really feel men need to walk off the job and take to the streets until this matter is resolved. Feminists had their bra burning sessions. Maybe it's time for guys to burn their jock straps or something other to make a symbolic gesture that this will no longer be allowed.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:32 PM
70

Love how the link to the Australian paper says that the obligation is on the men to discover the fraud. How in the hell are we to know they're lying when we're supposed to be able to "trust" our significant others. Imagine how this is going to pan out if more men do ask for tests. It will erode trust, breed resentment and fuel even more destruction to family than is already occurring. She says, well, get paternity tests while pregnant. Yea, ok, amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling are bot…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:09 PM
4

I wasn't going to chime in because I've been immersed in reading, but I think something needs to be said with regard to "feminist theory" as a whole. When you look at issues like rape, domestic violence (Duluth Model,) child abuse, all can be traced back to "feminist/suffragette theory and action," and the lens through which each is seen and defined. Let me say this too, so there's no misunderstanding. Many men like myself have survived child sexual abuse, and other forms of abuse at the hands o…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:15 AM
1

I didn't initially read it no, but I will go dissect the research real fast. I'll get back to you when I track down the original research which should be sometime this evening. Here's one of them that I'm looking over. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf Here's another: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf The "sexual victimization of college women," survey found that 3 percent of college women experienced a completed or attempted rape/sexual assault during the curren…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:59 PM
1

No, I know the NISVS is different, but mentioned it only to illustrate the ridiculous definition which is inherently flawed. The NISVS is supposed to be nationally representative as well as opposed to the 1 in 5 claim which I should have been more clear when contrasting the two. It though, is also still flawed based on the definition of the variables.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 07:28 PM
1

The 1 in 5 stat came from a 2 college sample. It was then erroneously extrapolated to the thousands of colleges nationwide though it was in no way nationally representative. I've not personally tracked down the measure, but have tracked down the 2010 NISVS info, and the predominant operational of rape/sexual assault relies on the feminist historically framed definition of "penetration" which precludes women from perpetrating as that's not how they're anatomically designed. Most studies using tha…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:21 PM
1

This is actually being done to refute the 1 in 5 myth. AAU is running it on 28 campuses across the country, all listed in the link below. https://www.aau.edu/news/article.aspx?id=15806 I spoke via email with Mr. Toiv and assured him that if they stick with the prevailing sexist definition of rape, it will be nothing more than a glorified study demonstrating confirmation bias as per usual. Needless to say he wasn't happy. I could have given him new operational definitions as the data is the data …
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:37 AM
1

This is part of a huge research project including 28 schools. https://www.aau.edu/news/article.aspx?id=15806 It's still going to be a flawed study. I talked to Mr. Toiv at the AAU via email, and there's no way to get the survey. It would compromise the study.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:20 AM
1

Yes there were issues, and the respondents who were reluctant were offered additional gift cards to rejoin the data set. Most were conducted over the phone so the researcher took the notes over the phone. I tried to offer the AAU my idea, but they said it's too late to implement it as the survey has already started being administered which tells me they're not even looking for male victims or female perpetrators. It will simply be another study laden with confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:14 AM
1

As other research has noted, people lie. It's detecting the lies by subtle variations in the survey questions to tease out the most accurate data. I've not seen the measure yet, but I do know the 2010 CDC NISVS survey was 91 pages.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:31 PM
1

It all depends on how they operationally define the variables as well as consistently applying the same classification to the same behavior demonstrated when coding the data by both sexes. Self reporting has its disadvantages as with any other measure. I'm not sure how far into the process they are yet, or how they've defined the terms, but I had a research project in mind yet lack the current credentials to undertake it myself. My goal was similar to theirs, but to get the top 2 colleges in eac…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:10 AM
3

A Men's Rights wing of feminism seems needed. But why have one subservient to the other? Feminism and MRA must be merged at one point--both are egalitarian in principle (regardless of practice) However, I don't understand why MRAs and feminists, in principle, must be opposed. What you suggest is highly unlikely until the semantics and distortions of reality as well as bald face lies permeating the public discourse stop. That's not even touching on the incredulity with which some who identify as …
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:21 AM
6

They won't get the count right as they won't define it correctly.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 11:22 PM
3

There was enough evidence that she plead guilty.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:12 PM
1

Some people literally interpret that, but I think they're more symbolic than anything. I know the daughters were involved in this being pressed, which is why I'm not sold on the guy being a genuine threat. I can see a possible financial motive here for them. Getting back to her with Alzheimers, was she sundowning? Was she lucid? I can honestly see why this needs addressed, though I don't necessarily agree with the venue chosen.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 03:57 PM
0

Well, you raise a good point, which is why they're including the science. I'm not familiar enough with the science to necessarily speak intelligently about people afflicted with it. I will say based on my limited knowledge that they seem to have moments of lucidity, and other moments where they're not familiar with their surroundings or with the people around them. So imagine during an event of intercourse, the person afflicted with Alzheimer's getting frightened, or hysterical due to the illnes…
/r/MensRights18/04/15 03:45 PM
-1

For starters, I live in Iowa. Second, her being his wife is completely and totally irrelevant. Just because you marry someone doesn't mean they've said yes to every conceivable instance of sexual behavior. It's that kind of thinking that people take exception to. It works both ways, for men and women. I'm a pretty reasonable, rational guy, but I can see why this is a problem. What if it were the other way around? What if it were the guy who has Alzheimer's? I'm not inclined to think that just be…
/r/MensRights18/04/15 03:41 PM
6

Not that alzheimer's or dementia are necessarily anything like being under the influence of drugs or alcohol, but you can see the same logic. At what point can someone impaired no longer consent? And when does an external source then have a moral duty to protect from exploitation? It goes back to just because you can do something doesn't mean you should as well as are we our brother or sisters keeper.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 03:07 PM
5

Google her name (Loren Morris)
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:43 PM
35

Mary Kay Letourneau also blamed Vili Faulaau for making advances toward her sexually, and for her inability to thwart/ignore them as required by law. She could have even approached the school counselor to get Vili help then, and instead chose to become impregnated not once, but twice. The implication is the female perpetrator is never to be held fully accountable, and instead let's victim blame an undeveloped child for the lack of self control exhibited by the more developed women involved.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:42 PM
1

Oh I know, especially with the advent of online education. It's a matter of drive so to speak or adhering to tradition which in earlier articles pertaining to the bill, one of the opposing views was that it challenged the gender norms.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:38 PM
6

Don't you love that they claim to want an elimination of gender roles, and equality, yet fight not only shared parenting, and fight having to get off their ass to get a job? After the kids are in jr high, there's no need for a stay at home parent. It is a luxury, especially in todays economy.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:04 AM
3

This should have been attempted murder for crying out loud.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:45 AM
10

What kills me is, if they hadn't gotten married wouldn't they have had to pay for their own education? Why is it even remotely OK to ask someone else to pay for it for pete's sake. There are grants and scholarships all over the place, particularly for women, almost to the exclusion of men.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:05 AM
1

This case, and what this judge did is reminiscent of the Montana case where a judge "victim blamed," a girl victim in open court. I've already contacted the prosecutor of the case, as well as provided research and cited the Montana case to the presiding Judge's boss/prosecutor. I'm hoping they appeal the sentence.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 05:34 PM
1

Boy, seeing this after the sickening romanticizing of the Mary Kay Letourneau Vili Faulaau rape on ABC 2020 is just staggering.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:49 AM
1

I'd agree but they're not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 07:40 PM
8

Yes men who say such things are partially to blame for such things but equally to blame are feminists who have a long history of downplaying female perps. I've made numerous posts with sources that demonstrate an ongoing pattern over the last 170 years in the U.S. at least.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:20 PM
5

This is just the latest example of the feminist dismissal and downplaying of female perps. It's intentional. Walters is a feminist and she's interviewed them at least twice that I know of. I made a post denoting the 170 year pattern with sources.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:17 PM
4

So Letourneau preying on a child's need to be loved and accepted and the resultant brain washing is irrelevant to you? I view this as nothing more than Vili having Stockholm Syndrome. She used operant conditioning for crying out loud.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:51 PM
1

yea I didn't check the hashtag but will thanks.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:19 AM
6

nope, I refuse to watch and have already blasted Barbara Walters all over Twitter and Facebook. This is the flip side of the Vagina Monologues controversy. So now Feminists endorse both apparently. My comment on her facebook page: "Sadly, this story is consistent with the downplaying and denial of female predators long demonstrated by feminists. Evidence of such can be found in the book entitled "Redefining Rape," by Dr. Estelle Freedman, a feminist academic historian. I exchanged a couple of em…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:45 AM
2

This is just sick. We should be all over her FB page and other social media denouncing this crap.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 12:22 AM
4

This is the answer to women being more injured in DV/IPV settings. They're more likely to be injured as a result of them initiating violence, 3 times more likely in fact. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1858633/
/r/MensRights10/04/15 06:43 PM
4

The prosecutor should have recused themselves, or filed for a change of venue to avoid professional intimidation and conflict of interest if the comment mentioning this woman is the daughter of a judge are accurate.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:18 PM
3

Do feminists not take a general psychology course? Are they blissfully ignorant of the fact that men/boys are more visually stimulated than women, and that its roots are in evolution for survival purposes? I'm not defending gawking or leering at people but I'm astonished people don't think about such things before rattling off such nonsense. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2739403/
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:42 AM
0

To me, the use of such juvenile terms denote a lack of real intellect. I'm inclined to immediately ignore anyone who utters such a term. It's dismissive, crude, and insensitive. It's also a relatively new term used by younger people.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:14 AM
6

Yes, and they're not happy. Odd how when we (men) griped about it we were told in essence to get over it or outright ignored. Let the women (the one's paying and receiving alimony) fight it out. Less men casualties that way for goodness sake.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 06:44 PM
3

Just keep your wits about you and google fake tests.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 06:09 PM
1

Only way I know of is an chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis but I've not researched new techniques.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 06:04 PM
3

Be aware they sell fake pregnancy tests online. She could be trying to run a scam similar to what an Iowa woman recently did. As others have said, save every communication from her as evidence and remain civil but skeptical.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:59 PM
3

He's got a good line on "Teach women not to rape" posts as well. lol damn don't make me have an evil chuckle.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:16 AM
2

He needs to be aware of this. I'll let you inform him. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/31pgqf/this_video_shows_a_feminist_historian_who/ In the comments I link to an email response from the speaker of the video. It's evidence of what could only be characterized as a cover-up by feminists/suffragettes.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 12:29 AM
1

For those of you who doubt, this is a link to a response sent to me by Dr. Freedman. It's self evident that feminists knew of, and dismissed female perpetrators in lieu of a different agenda. http://bit.ly/1NS6NBT This is nothing short of a centuries long coverup of female perps.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:04 PM
1

No there's not a particular excerpt and this video is a synopsis of her book which is far longer.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 03:38 PM
3

Just wanted to add a quick note to say that with her historical research showing the defining and redefining of rape by suffragettes and feminists, that not once did the difference in biological design dawn on them, or legislators, nor did it dawn on them that a man's consent is equally relevant, nor did they acknowledge that women could sexually abuse children. It's a mindset that dates back 170 years as you'll find via the archive article linked here: https://archive.today/4lWvg It is a mindse…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 03:17 AM
1

Isn't that the truth. Spoken like a fellow student of statistics.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:24 PM
1

I posted the report in a new link in this sub if any of you are interested.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:59 AM
7

Can't wait for the report.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:05 PM
1

Well, I guess that's an answer. As I said, we've all got bills to pay as does Mr. Elam it would seem. Not that I'm in any way trying to demean his efforts, or those of his staff, but from where I'm sitting they all seem to have better resources than most I encounter. With that in mind, I'll go with my plan instead.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:56 AM
1

I understand full well what you're getting at. I'm not aware of the price breakdown for facilities, security, speaking fees, literature and such, but still it seems costly to me. There's nothing any of them can tell me that I can't ascertain for myself via research. It's not that I am not appreciative of their efforts, but I can think of more prudent efficacious ways to spend my money than to pay their salaries. I'd rather help a homeless guy get back on his feet.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:03 AM
8

What do you know it's just like real politics, pay to play. My only concern is where the money goes. I saw a video earlier of someone in Cincinnati looking for help as their living situation had deteriorated and they needed a hand. I personally think we'd gain far more traction helping those we can, much like is done on sites such as gofundme.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:55 AM
3

For some reason they can't seem to keep their lies straight. I'm reminded of that joke about how to tell when a lawyer is lying, their lips are moving. The same would apply to feminist leaning individuals when regurgitating statistics.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:07 PM
1

I wonder if the author asked questions pertaining to financial abuse of the spouses who earned less than their partners. I'd be willing to wager they didn't. I'd also be willing to wager that there is a positive correlation on that front as well. If correct in my hypotheses, one could reasonably conclude that abuse is further disengendered and that neither sex is immune to such behaviors. But we couldn't possibly reveal that given that feminists have lied and obstructed the truth for decades to …
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:05 PM
2

You weren't berated. You got called out on your dishonesty, as well as being called out for trying to change the subject to add an irrelevant topic. I can quote you all day long to demonstrate the point but I learned long ago that dishonest people seldom acknowledge their dishonesty when called out on it. You were also the one to fire the first dismissive condescending salvo by saying this (Your going "what about the menz.") in your second comment. When I reiterated the position that I've made a…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:43 AM
1

I've been consistent while you've tried to inject a different variable, that being other women prisoners who have kids. This was specifically about newborns being raised in prison by women. At the outset you said this isn't a men's rights issue, and have had nothing of value nor anything positive to add, yet you then suggest you're trying to have an intellectually honest conversation? And when you get called on your deception you then attempt to project that onto me, someone who's been consisten…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:28 AM
1

There is no debate to be had. It's sexist on its face. Women are no more important to their children than men. Why is that so hard for you to understand? You want to rationalize and justify why this sexism exists and I refuse to allow that. That you would even say it's not a gendered issue and cite other women prisoners who don't have newborns to which this article applies is slimy and disingenuous.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:14 AM
1

Geez, that's a whole new level of stupid.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:56 AM
8

"Women’s rights activist Sue Montgomery calls the arrest bothersome, but not damaging to causes like hers." “With every case that is made up there are a million legitimate cases,” says Montgomery. Yea, boy, if that's what she truly believes then we might come close to that 1 in 5 statistic. In all seriousness, I loathe rapists and child rapists, but I also loathe liars.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:51 AM
1

So men who are parents of newborns have no prisoner rights? Sorry, but the whole notion of being a prisoner means you forfeit certain rights, not the least of which is freedom and the ability to raise your kids. To give women the right while in prison to raise their children and not men is the very definition of sexist discrimination.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:17 AM
1

I said that tongue and cheek as details pertaining to how she became pregnant are lacking. I still wouldn't have any reservation about it being a calculated move on her part.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 06:16 PM
1

Check out the Bonita Vela case also out of Indiana. She was the woman who took a box cutter to her daughter's boyfriend's penis while in a drug induced delusion only to be given a plea deal and sent back home to raise her children. When I conversed with the ADA that prosecuted, I was led to believe meth was involved, so I'm pretty resolute in my thinking on this. Not all drug users are nonviolent. It's inappropriate to paint them as such.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:23 PM
1

I know birth control fails. I'm looking at the fact she got a plea deal for one which speaks to the sentencing disparity between the sexes. We don't know if the father of the child in question is the other meth cook but we do know he's not in the child's life which speaks to the disposability of fathers. This case embodies that mothers are more important than fathers even when they screw up. I am personally so beyond fed up with that antiquated thinking. Just last week there was a story about a …
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:56 PM
0

I've made clear why this is indeed a men's rights issue if you'd care to read the posts I've made. You may have a different opinion, but bottom line, no such program exists for fathers who are incarcerated. Why is that? Could this program help reinforce the notion that mothers are more important than disposable fathers? Also, look at the pathetic sentence she got for manufacturing. Have you researched the sentencing disparity between the sexes?
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:43 PM
1

Well I lived in the system for 8 years. I've seen the caliber of intellect of those running the system who face little to no accountability if anything goes wrong as evidenced by missing kids all over the country in addition to abuse in foster care and group home care, poor training, lousy limited inspection but I digress. You say it's traumatic to the infant to remove them from a parent. I took many college courses regarding human development and I don't ever recall reading such a thing regardi…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:41 PM
3

If you look at the link to the research, they do recidivate. Just because the scientists classify recidivation as going back to the prison doesn't mean they aren't rearrested. The percentages are also negligible.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:29 AM
1

This is the study to which they refer. Note there's no discussion of the methodology, nor a mention of the children of those who did recidivate, nor is there a mention of the variables and controls. Also note the sample size is too small to be of any significance. http://www.in.gov/idoc/files/Wee_Ones_Study.pdf Here's the actual study. http://www.uindy.edu/documents/Assessing_Outcomes_for_Wee_Ones_Nursery_at_Indiana_Womens_Prison.pdf
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:06 AM
5

As I posted above, I'm more concerned with her doing drugs while pregnant and the child suffering as a result of her selfishness. It's not ok. It's just not ok. I also am concerned about her recidivating, and something happening to the child as a result in addition to the emotional and other potential traumatic fallout should she go back to meth.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:35 AM
5

Why it's a problem should be self explanatory. She got pregnant in between hearings before the final dispensation of her case. Surely she had an inkling that prison was a possibility yet she chose to get pregnant, obviously oblivious to the concept of birth control. That said, when men are incarcerated and have kids in their younger years it makes no difference, and they're not allowed to live with their children in prison. Furthermore, when men had conjugal visits and a pregnancy resulted, they…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:28 PM
18

There is so much wrong with this I don't even know where to begin other than to state outright, this reeks of female privilege. She made choices to manufacture, deal, and do drugs. She also made a choice to get pregnant knowing she was going to be incarcerated. When men commit crimes and are incarcerated for it, they aren't afforded the luxury this woman and others are. Men have to go by the visitation schedule to have any interaction with their loved ones, so why should there be any difference …
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:55 PM
1

Even though it might be an april fool's article there has been a rise in cosmetic labiaplasty surgeries.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:06 AM
1

Perhaps, I've read too much today and am still reading research.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:12 AM
1

No, I mean someone who puts up a front to attract someone then once they got them they change and expect everything to go on as it did before.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 10:49 PM
1

I know. I am more inclined to think the poster of that original text is a bait and switch artist.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:21 PM
2

https://danceswithfat.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/dating-fat/
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:20 PM
2

Though I'm not a lawyer, several have told me that constitutional arguments applied to child custody cases are never successful. I'm not sure why. It's just what I've been told.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:18 PM
13

There were only two comments after her post. If you take the first line and google it you'll find the post. Then scroll down to her comment. The follow up comments are as follows: "On November 21, 2011 at 4:52 pm x said: This article and all of the comments, are really pulling at my heart strings. My husband and I have been together for 6 yrs, married for 2. All through our relationship i was slender..but miserable. I wouldnt say that i was unhealthy, but I had my ridiculous book of rules and I …
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:15 PM
2

I don't know about what others are going to do but I've been exchanging emails with population geneticists regarding paternity fraud, and reviewing the professional literature on numerous fronts including DV/IPV, parenting time and so forth. I've also been in contact with several state and federal legislators trying to get information as well as provide information as well as suggesting that we need to take a look again at the Bradley Amendment. I've also conversed with lawyers and others pertai…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:58 PM
7

Figures. And I see them all jumping on his conduct without so much as an acknowledgement of hers.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:11 PM
13

They've apparently locked the thread and removed the text of it. Do you have a copy saved?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 07:30 PM
1

If you had your research done, and outlined the book (did the prep work for chapter content,) you could literally punch out a manuscript in a month.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 11:39 PM
1

Yea, from what I watched the data doesn't seem very reliable. Even the samples from the LA Times article drawn from hospital genetic disease testing seems relatively small in size, too small, I'd argue to extrapolate to the general population given the rarity of some of the diseases for which they test. The data still gives a good conservative estimate.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:20 AM
2

And if he refuses because he blindly believes his wife/girlfriend and is being exploited during an equally emotionally vulnerable time (the birth of his child?) Mandatory is the only way to ensure deception isn't rewarded by the states.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:04 AM
1

Here's one of the budget docs from Fiscal years 2010 2011 2012 http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/olab/cse.pdf
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:32 AM
2

Yes, from what limited info I've seen I'd concur. I think we're inevitably headed toward mandatory paternity testing for every child born in this country, and just wait until feminists get wind of that. They already don't like their treachery exposed nor being held accountable for it.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:15 AM
1

I didn't necessarily miss it as much as I didn't give the statistic any validity whatsoever without knowing the sample from which it was drawn. I may not be a statistician, but did take some statistics in college. If I had to hazard a guess, I'd put the real data showing 7-10%
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:04 AM
1

So one could call it a biased sample that would artificially inflate the percentage.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:01 AM
1

All relationships, marriages and other that end, end up with the state as the intermediary one way or another. That's why I use the child support estimates. You're correct in that some don't ask for paternity tests as they are oblivious to the fact they've been defrauded and deceived and therefore have no reason to be suspicious, or raise the issue. The Dr. in the article alludes to hospitals genetically testing for hereditary paternal diseases as one of her sources. Bottom line, the state is al…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:53 PM
2

I actually talk to her on facebook, and we're both working toward that end. I already have the total federal appropriation which is about 4.5 billion, however, I still need to go state by state and get their budget info. The only flaw with the numbers is the application of the matching funds in that order. So those numbers would be halved back to the median child support payment of $430.00 per month per man.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:13 PM
1

The numbers above are perhaps inaccurate insofar as what I've been able to ascertain is that the matching funds only apply to the administrative costs of enforcement programs, which would include salaries, rent, and a host of other expenditures; not necessarily the payments collected themselves. However, what is spent on collections should be able to be seen via FOIA, or state budgets. We should still find out what each state stands to lose via federal funding if they actually address paternity …
/r/MensRights28/03/15 09:38 PM
1

Check my new post. I've done a rough cost estimate but could use some assistance as I don't know what if any funds Title IV-A kicks into child support collections. I can't believe no one has done the number crunch.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 07:51 PM
1

I understand the low percentages, but have yet to find a source corroborating the higher percentage you cite. Additionally, one thing mentioned in the discussions regarding SB 5006 that recently failed in Washington state, was how much this would affect Title IV-D and Title IV-A. So I'm trying to ascertain those figures seeing how no one had those readily available for some reason and in fact it might very well be the motive for which states are putting up resistance.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 05:22 PM
1

I've got an email out to the Dr. who wrote this : http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/20/opinion/la-oe-zuk-paternity-20100620 I'm asked where her data and source material comes from. Given her numbers, it would put the range from 41K to 153K men annually combined with birth stats. After watching the hearings, I still can't believe that one lady suggested there was something illegal in submitting a child's DNA for testing and that that was a more pressing matter to deal with than people being de…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 10:21 PM
1

The only stats I can find regarding paternity fraud aren't what I'd consider a reliable source. Do you have a reliable source for how many children born annually in the U.S. are the result of an affair leaving the married men responsible due to presumptive parent laws?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:20 PM
2

We should be flooding federal legislators offices with calls and emails nationwide to amend the Bradley amendment in addition to our state legislators to induce them to levy penalties for paternity fraud. That a member of the LGBT community let his personal situation influence the position he takes without even acknowledging the intentional deception employed by some is ludicrous. Apparently that clown doesn't think this has anything to do with honor and trust?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:12 AM
2

Let me get the archive today link. https://archive.today/R430o Here's the reddit thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2yza17/florida_feminist_groups_are_trying_to_derail_the/ Here's a more current link: https://archive.today/PBIvm
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:20 AM
2

Feminists are already trying to slap down a similar measure in Florida.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 11:42 PM
2

Carnell Alexander from Detroit is a child support case. Also look at all the adoption fraud going on out in Utah. Look at the Dusten Brown (baby Veronica) supreme court case also the Baby Desirai case, both out of Oklahoma. There are tons of cases. Google paternity fraud, or how visitation isn't enforced in Texas despite having a criminal penalty. There is another glaringly obvious example regarding paternity issues. What I'm referring to is presumptive parent laws specifically applied to husban…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 07:07 PM
1

Have you mentioned this to your obstetrician? When my son was born, that's who was to do his procedure as I was told before making it clear that wasn't going to happen. If need be, get some legal documentation expressly forbidding it, and discuss with the child's father, assuming they're on the same page.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 10:16 PM
2

Here's a good piece too. Perhaps the author of the above was unaware of this as it exposes the disparity in enforcement as well. http://pjmedia.com/drhelen/2013/03/15/women-who-fail-to-pay-all-of-their-child-support-are-incarcerated-only-one-eighth-as-often-as-men-with-similar-violations/ It would be nice to compile the nationwide data to see just how widespread the disparity is.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:38 PM
3

I understand that, and agree. However, when the MSM still takes issues like the Ray Rice case and conflates self defense with DV/IPV, and Kimmel argues proportionality without even so much as an acknowledgement to the triggering of primal instincts, "fight or flight," it would appear to me that intellectual dishonesty is afoot.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:54 PM
3

Given the heated public debate I'd have to disagree.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:50 PM
3

Instead of bickering over the methodological issues with the CTS, which are well known and expounded on, they should perhaps go after the methodological flaws in opposing research. Researchers need to ask the tough questions and include context so we get a clearer picture.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:44 PM
2

I thought Dutton took care of Johnson already? http://responsiblerecovery.org/PDF/PartnerAbuse.pdf
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:33 PM
6

I think it would be crucial to ask Kimmel why DV/IPV researchers are so fearful of asking in their research, who hit first and their reasoning behind the physical escalation. It would be further crucial to ascertain why the deluded belief that there's never a need for physical intervention is so widespread. Example, a wife or husband catches the other molesting/abusing their child. When moral imperatives are broken by despicable actions, and natural protective instincts are then characterized as…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:53 PM
2

I also took the survey today and felt some neutral responses were missing which might skew the results. There were other questions I also felt were too simplified. Systemic cowardice or pandering might also be a cause for some of the issues we face, such as those who don't want to anger their voters. I do appreciate the effort, but for egalitarians like myself, some of the forced answers, or absolutist type questions left something to be desired.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:39 PM
1

Look, I'm not going to argue with you as it's clear you don't have an understanding of brain development. The frontal lobes of adolescents aren't fully developed. That part of the brain is responsible for higher level cognition, and reasoning among other things. When, as I said previously, a fully developed adult takes advantage of that partially developed person, be they male or female, it's just wrong. It's exploitative by nature due to the level of development.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:03 PM
0

Ok, you had to look up one of the definitions of exploitation to try and justify that this shouldn't be viewed as all that bad when a fully mentally developed woman takes advantage of a still developing adolescent? Did you see the second definition? Do you really want me to post it or are you just trolling? Did you not hear about the case of the kid who, in a similar situation is now liable for child support? It's wrong guy. And there's not a damned thing you can say to me to change that view po…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:13 PM
1

Some are convinced it's a hoax for publicity. Not saying that's not possible, but I honestly don't know enough to say one way or the other.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:26 AM
14

There is scientific evidence that girls cognitively and emotionally develop faster than boys. That said, and acknowledged, we can logically deduce that boys, generally speaking, might not be as prepared as adolescent girls to engage in sexual activity and are more susceptible to exploitation. http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/12/13/cercor.bht333.short
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:13 AM
33

This is why men enmass need to be politically active. Start firing off emails, make calls to your legislators. Every country can do this. Nothing is stopping you. Get involved. Change the way it's handled. If you're a professional, say a lawyer, and don't like the way things are, throw your hat in the ring for DA, or legislator.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:44 PM
37

It's not just the judges. I see too many men commenting in similar threads about the "older woman" fantasy. It's repulsive, and equally a responsibility to challenge and change that mindset.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 09:51 PM
1

I think that's already been done in the UK. I saw an article to that effect at least. I just can't remember where.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:51 AM
1

Already doing that too, but there are also state and local monies involved. In light of recent events in Canada, perhaps they should do the same.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:46 AM
1

Global numbers would be ambitious to say the least for one person. I'm on the CBO site U.S. right now but will also need to get on each of the 50 state government sites and track down the numbers of course just to get rough estimates. The private donations won't be so easily tracked to either service providers or academics. I think given that we know fraud has been perpetrated regarding the professional literature, which I'm not convinced is an outlying event, we need to compile the data on spen…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:46 PM
2

I'll give it a go over when the coffee seeps into my cerebral cortex. Until then I'm useless. Thanks though for the article.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:41 PM
2

After reading and rereading, I think it would be fair to say that women are injured more as a result of them initiating the violence as opposed to the other way around.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:33 AM
2

The other has Dr. Gelles saying he's been threatened for his research showing women to be violent. Given recent events in Canada, you might want to look up Suzanne Steinmetz and Murray Straus here: http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V71-Straus_Thirty-Years-Denying-Evidence-PV_10.pdf Also look up how Erin Pizzey was threatened and drummed out of the group she helped found due to her acknowledgement of male victims. There are a couple of studies also, well there are tons of studies, but these two: http…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:35 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhXfeBFATHw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlFAd4YdQks
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:13 AM
4

Yea, I read it and commented with tons of literature.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 08:29 PM
9

Well, think about your statement for a minute. If they're saying it's anti-feminist, yet the billboard shows a woman being violent. The implication then would be that women's use of violence is acceptable.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 07:30 PM
2

You ask what makes me think they're leeching. Simple answer. Go to any online MMORPG game and see who the majority of daytime players are. So while their guy is off busting his butt, they're sitting on theirs while simultaneously complaining about their husband while also soliciting sexual attention. I could go on and on. I've seen it on numerous game platforms from WOW to Runescape, to wizards, to any number of other games. I already acknowledged the workforce is comprised of 47% of women. Howe…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 01:21 PM
1

You can go to any drug store now and get a DNA test. They use a lab identical to, or very similar to the ones the states use to establish paternity. You can fight it, if you want to. It's the presumptive laws that need to be looked at.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 11:36 AM
9

You are aware that women are approximately 60% of the current crop of college students? You're also aware that they (women) comprise about 47% of the workforce? To say they cannot get skills while married given the advent of online colleges which facilitates the education of the SAHP be they male or female is beyond dishonest. What this bill will do if passed, as it should do, is make people realize hey, you too can get off your ass and get job and stop using housekeeping as an excuse to leech o…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 11:20 AM
21

So instead of obtaining the skills, let's just give them a free life, free of responsibility? Good god the entitled mindset is unfathomable.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 02:51 AM
1

Feel free to share the link as I'm doing so much reading that I don't have time to cover all other subs.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:38 PM
2

Done deal.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:26 PM
3

It's absolutely legal. You, or her, at any time can take your child prior to divorce and move to another state. You're married. You have every right to take your child and leave, and make her pursue custody. It's not kidnapping your own child if you're legally married and already have joint legal custody as a matter of law due to being legally married. If you're uncertain of what I claim, call the police as they'll confirm it, or better yet, reach out to your state legislator. If the child in qu…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:40 PM
2

Do you live near another bordering state? If so, you, like her, are equally capable of taking your child legally to another state and setting up residence while filing for divorce.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:43 PM
3

The personal attack aside, there are countless examples of people doing despicable things to their children every day in this country and that doesn't necessarily mean they're insane. You're making an assumption that instincts kick in, yet how many women have trashed their kids which inspired safe haven laws? If you're going to continue to personally attack me because I refuse to adopt your world view, when I've actually studied human psychopathology, and mental illness, then we've nothing furth…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:59 PM
5

It doesn't matter if you put it in all caps, or accentuate it with a litany of punctuation. You offered up your assumption regarding her mental state of mind, and I disagree. I'm not willing to call her any more or less "psycho" than a father who kills his kid as was done by the father who shot his son in a supervised visit. If you want to call someone crazy for being selfish, spiteful and cruel, go for it.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:36 PM
3

According to you that's the evidence. In a court of law that would be called speculation. I happen to think she's just a mean, selfish woman who refused to share her kids with anyone as there are many other women of identical mindset who fabricate abuse, or abduct their children to keep from sharing their kids. This is a spiteful woman, nothing more.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:16 PM
4

You missed the point of my entire post. The article does mention that she was given legal notification of a custody challenge. She then chose instead of giving up custody to do what she did. From the article, "'You'd better hurry but you will be too late to rescue them. They won't survive.' Mr Ulin immediately called his sister, who lives nearby, in a panic and asked her to hurry to the family home. When she arrived at the scene, she found their charred bodies of Mr Ulin's daughters in the garde…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:51 PM
4

As a poster above has already stated, this woman, rather than cede custody of her children to her husband, killed them. I saw a post just the other day of a father doing the same thing while in a supervised visit no less. Whenever women kill their kids, it's automatically characterized as "crazy", "insane," she must have had mental problems, and so on, as evidenced by Andrea Yates, Susan Smith, Megan Huntsman, Erika Murray. It's about the proprietary mindset with which women view their children …
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:44 PM
4

I understand that it's an uncommon method, but it's only one category of the whole. Taken in whole, when combined with all other atrocities against children, women are no better than men, and in fact are worse. In fact, take a look at this. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2007/05/02/motherhood-today-tougher-challenges-less-success/
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:28 PM
6

I don't know how to make it more clear than this. Feminist groups, feminist backed groups have told countless lies that affect child custody, as well as have impacted policy/law adversely for men. When a movement professing to want equality lies to obtain superiority then it can't be allowed to continue masquerading for the espoused "equality" objective when mounting evidence suggests to the contrary. I'm not opposed whatsoever to equality. How I look at equality is vastly different than "femini…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:21 PM
5

There was just a case of this in the US, New Jersey, as well. Statistically speaking more women kill their kids than men as well as abuse. https://archive.today/2tXQH
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:15 PM
7

Let me put this another way if you don't mind. We consistently hear time and again from feminists and those opposed to shared custody that children aren't possessions, or property. We also hear them cite erroneous statistics to paint the majority of men as abusers undeserving of their children. We also hear that men have the "If I can't have it, you can't either" entitled mentality. What the above exemplifies in my way of thinking is that neither sex is immune to that behavior, and that in fact …
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:52 PM
6

I've noticed the concerted efforts of many to control the dialogue by redefining terms. By far it's one of the most insidious forms of intellectual dishonesty. What is most telling about this as far as I'm concerned is, that they're more concerned with maintaining a delusional belief despite facts that glaringly contradict the view they hold.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:49 PM
3

When "Faux" news show the five, of all places, does a piece exposing that the wage myth doesn't exist, you can rest assured that there is other evidence out there. Christina Hoff Sommers wrote this: https://archive.today/Z6YKu
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:01 PM
5

There are many who seem to think men's rights is an oxymoron due to the belief in "the patriarchy." Others, such as Girlwriteswhat AKA Karen Straughan, have listed numerous areas in which feminism not only seeks to perpetuate the "patriarchy" when it is advantageous to women, but also use it to oppress men while simultaneously claiming they wish to eradicate it and do away with gender roles. One such area of contention pertains to child custody and shared parenting which has been vehemently oppo…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:14 PM
5

I can't speak for anyone else, to be honest. I can only speak to my personal motivation and experience. I see many areas that put men at a distinct disadvantage to women and think that it's largely ignored by those who profess to want equality while using red herrings and or strawmen, or completely irrelevant factors that neither gender had a hand in deciding.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:04 PM
9

I'm for equal rights and responsibility in all areas. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:00 PM
0

It should be compelled by law as a requirement. Just because one person is willing to give up their rights doesn't automatically eliminate the rights of fathers. Currently, that's precisely what our system promotes.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 04:04 AM
1

Good researchers to look up include Denise Hines, Don Dutton, Murray Strauss, who will all have citations to other research. Do a google search with the keywords, gender symmetry, domestic violence. Also note how feminist academics have sanitized rape stats to exclude male victims of female rapists. A glaring example of this would be the work of Mary P Koss and her article entitled, "detecting the scope of rape." Her work has gone on to influence public policy and perception up to and including …
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:59 AM
1

I don't hate sex guy. What I hate is that only men are held responsible for it. I think both are equally responsible for not only sex, but any potential outcome of having sex. If you have an issue with that, fine.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:41 PM
1

http://iga.in.gov/legislative/2015/bills/house/1016# Plain text would suggest I'm dead on the money.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:45 PM
1

Guess they should have thought about that as men are told to huh? What's good for the gander is equally good for the goose.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:29 PM
0

Held accountable means financially, responsibilty.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:21 PM
1

Since you want to make lists lets. 1.) You make the assumption the men know a child exists as the case I linked illustrates just isn't true. 2.) You then deny that safe haven laws facilitate via their anonymity; the surrender of a child that may have another willing parent if they know it exists, yet due to the very anonymity will unlikely be found. (What safeguards are in place to ensure this doesn’t happen?) 3.) You neglect to even acknowledge that unmarried men already have limited rights and…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:13 PM
0

Personal attacks when you sit there smugly denying reality that these laws and others enable women to deprive men of their children under the banner of law and anonymity? Please. Go be intellectually dishonest elsewhere as I've had my fill of dishonest people.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:00 PM
0

Who allowed the mother to shit all over the father's rights with anonymity and absolution? Oh that's right, the states did by creating these laws.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:55 PM
0

You are a good troll. I'll give you that. With what information are you going to track down the extended family? Surely no birth certificate will be included in the surrender of a child. Surely since they're anonymous surrenders, you won't have the name of the mother on record. Are you really this dense? You call it conjecture when it's quite on point? I could downvote your posts too, but it's not worth my time or energy.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:47 PM
0

As I illustrated with the case I linked, even if she had used "safe haven laws" the father was unaware of the child's existence because she didn't tell him. I'm certain her case isn't an outlier, yet does the law account for such instances? What steps are going to be taken to find the babies father, or extended family? Or is only her choice relevant since the majority of those being surrendered are going to be done by mothers. If you can't get that then you sir are beyond hope.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:42 PM
-1

What efforts are states like Indiana going to take when a baby is surrendered, to find any extended family, or the father of that child? What if the father didn't know? Are men supposed to have ESP? What if communication is cut off as was the case in the Dusten Brown case? What if the woman was married as was the wife of Terry Achane? I see all sorts of problems here.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:33 PM
-1

Let me make my position on financial abortion abundantly clear. First, someone has to pay, bottom line. Both men and women are financially responsible. I'm alluding specifically to laws that allow women to forego all financial, emotional, and personal responsibility for their children while no such similar option is available to men. The often touted rhetoric is "don't have sex if you don't want the responsibility." Instead, options like the above are developed to help women abdicate all respons…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:08 PM
0

You call being held accountable punished? What, men don't get their taxes, licenses, paychecks and freedom taken for having sex that results in a kid, with state and federal government support?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:31 PM
-1

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/08/06/baby-abandoned-just-steps-away-from-safe-have/13703269/ In the above article, the father wasn't even aware of a pregnancy, and the woman now faces a slough of charges because even though she was so close to a safe haven, she still opted to trash the child. You're giving one person too much power here which encroaches on the rights of fathers. Unwed fathers already have zero rights yet statistics will tell you that the number of children born o…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:25 PM
0

I'm not the least bit religious. I'm infuriated that those chosen to lead have thought in their infinite wisdom that people don't need to be held responsible for their choices. Men are held consistently to a higher standard of accountability, particularly with children as I listed all of the remedies in a preceding post. This law, and the laws that inspired it are pandering to irresponsible women. Why in the hell can't they be held accountable for their choice to have sex as men are? How simple …
/r/MensRights03/03/15 04:57 PM
1

Regardless of the gender neutrality of this law, you seem to have divorced yourself from the facts. Absent the death of a mother, who typically has custody of a child under a month old? Who will this primarily affect if not only the kids, but many of the unwed men in Indiana who will have no recourse. If you call that alarmist and not serious then you sure as hell have no comprehension of the potential misuse of these as I'm sure countless men have already had their rights to their children stri…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 04:54 PM
0

I am well aware Indiana, like other states have safe haven laws. I find it ironic that you suggest these laws encourage people to turn over their kids before doing something stupid or perhaps illegal. Just take a gander at that article from California. It's nice to sit and have misplaced faith, but I'm a realist. These laws help encourage irresponsibility of both men and women. What are you going to do when some guy gets his kid dropped off in a box without his consent, or knowledge. Of course, …
/r/MensRights03/03/15 04:27 PM
2

Or worse, like this? http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2015/03/02/baby-justices-father-says-hes-standing-behind-samantha-green-as-cps-prepares-files/ So let's go ahead and encourage it more? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:20 AM
3

I'll admit I hadn't thought of your first point. I suspect it's not something thought of by Indiana legislators either. It certainly is a point worth mentioning to the legislators I'd assume, and before the law is passed if it hasn't been already. To your second point, we both know men who abandon are already vilified in the media, and by society at large. I'm not saying the point is invalid, but I would contend that scenario is far less likely to happen. That being said, I think we owe it to ou…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 12:59 AM
0

I'd write as many as you conceivably can. This is beyond reprehensible.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:12 PM
10

As I've said elsewhere, men are shamed and degraded via numerous methods to hold them accountable for children. Such methods include the taking of their drivers license, garnishing wages, taking of their tax refunds, or even the taking of their freedom. I've yet to see such methods employed as widely on women who abandon kids.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 10:24 PM
1

I was touching simply on the abandonment issue which was part of the discussion and providing some relevant information. Women have innumerable ways to evade financial responsibility while men don't. Frankly, they too should be held financially accountable for a change such as the case recently of the man supposedly owing 30K for a child not his that the mother fraudulently listed as the father to collect state benefits instead of getting off her ass and getting a job. On the one hand we have st…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 09:41 PM
1

I understand where you're coming from but think you missed my point so I'll reiterate it succinctly. Society sanctions women abandoning their children while punishing men for the same behavior. That's far from equal. In fact, men are castigated for abandoning their children for any reason, yet not so for women as you yourself are saying "There are obviously acceptable/legal/moral and unacceptable/illegal/immoral ways to do it." When men do it it's illegal, when women do it, it's mostly legal.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 09:29 PM
1

Let's talk about abandonment shall we? What about abandonment with the assistance of safe haven laws brought about in the US by dumpster babies in California. Or let's talk about abandonment via abortion or adoption, often times perpetrated without the men even knowing a child existed shall we? I find it quite disturbing that we often want to hold men fully accountable for having sex that results in children while society simultaneously finds every excuse in the world to negate a woman's identic…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 07:16 PM
2

I think this is an excellent idea as there are a couple of different hypotheses we can test here: reverse the genders male aggressor, reverse genders female aggressor male recipient, reverse genders with male touching sleeping female sexually, reverse genders female touching sleeping male sexually, and so on and so forth. Perhaps then people will get it.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:57 PM
1

When you test the theory, send me the links please. I'm anxious to see the disparity in responses. I think IrideTheDirt has more than adequately defined the parameters by which to test the different hypotheses to illuminate the different responses.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:32 PM
37

The denial is deep in the comments on that thread as is the reinforcement of behavioral double standards. They'll not change their minds as those asinine positions are too ingrained in their ideological thinking/psychological makeup. I learned long ago as a man that I'm eternally wrong in all matters when it comes to women, in general that is. Women are perfect saints above reproach. Where this delusion starts is anybody's guess, but it needs to be addressed/combated.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:31 PM
2

In my brief encounter with Mr. Kimmel, I find him lacking in the sense that he wants to hold those of the male persuasion more accountable than their female counterparts for similar behavior by using such variables as physical strength to strip men of their rights to self defense. If anything, he seeks to neuter men as much if not more than those operating under the feminist flag.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:55 PM
1

Not only the children were the intended victims as I see it. What about the parents of those children? Wouldn't you consider them targets of this woman's maliciousness? I sure would. Her goal was to create havoc, for no other reason than to entertain herself. I think that speaks for itself.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:19 PM
1

We'll see how it pans out. I'm betting a plea deal will be given, and that this is just a strategy on her part to lessen her culpability. She's using it as a mitigating factor when it has no bearing on her behavior. She had a choice each step of the way and chose wrong.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:42 PM
1

lol Yea, I'm sure that did it.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:29 AM
1

If you want the case number to get the records which cost less than 20 bucks, it is 41C011401FD000082. I got both the sentencing and the PAC (probable cause arrest doc) enroute. Forgot to mention the sheriff arrest docs too.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 09:49 PM
3

"Lindgren allegedly told police she was forced to take the photographs by a man she has only met online, never in person." Does the quote not say she's denying full responsibility? How can someone you've never met force you to do a damned thing? What it speaks to, is how it's always the man's fault, and that is precisely how it's pertinent to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 05:58 PM
1

Below in the comments I mention what the prosecutor and I discussed. She recanted the molestation allegation in open court.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:52 AM
1

The reason for the plea deal was that the victim wasn't to be found, nor was he cooperative per DA Bland, Johnson County Indiana DA office. He also stated the injury is not what it was made out to be in the press. Regardless, the psychological terror inflicted on this young man is also a factor. Had he been willing to testify, she might have gotten more time. I was lead to believe the max was a year and a half D felony. I'm awaiting the information in the files, but was also informed that the tw…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:01 PM
3

Short of consulting an actual attorney, I don't think anyone here could adequately answer your question. Of course, they would do a relatively cheap consult and give you their opinions on if your claim has merit worth pursuing. Problem is, cases such as that seldom are conducted for contingency fees, and instead rely on retainers. The old adage, "you get the amount of justice you can afford," comes to mind.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 06:37 AM
2

After much digging, I now have the prosecutors name (it was a man), will get a call back friday. I've confirmed those who acted in concert weren't arrested, or charged per the sheriff who wouldn't comment further. The outcome of this case per court records was a plea deal according to the clerk of court.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 09:22 PM
1

First thing first, gathering information about all involved. I do know the feds can still charge though as I previously mentioned. It's a holiday today so you'll probably get no luck with the County Attorney in Johnson County Indiana. I'm trying to ascertain the names of the others involved and see their sentences to do a comparison. Other than that, it's just building the case to put to the Indiana ethics committee for making such a sexist deal. I've already emailed DOJ, and am awaiting a respo…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:48 PM
2

I'm sure the narrative would be much different if a male were the primary aggressor, but after just finding out the two accomplices were men I'm focused on finding anything I can pertaining to them. Let's see the different narratives.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:41 PM
0

Look, whoever the hell you are. No one is making any damned excuses for her. She's no less responsible for her actions being cranked up than if she killed someone. She's no less responsible at all. I've said that time and again. As for a hallucinogen such as pcp, lsd, and the like, is that you're hung up on the classification, and not one of the potential side effects of the drugs. For christ's sake, they were aware of methamphetamine induced psychosis back in the 40's. In fact, meth has petrole…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:27 PM
2

The scholars back long term meth use with psychosis, so they're wrong you're saying? There's tons of scholarly evidence to back up the assertion. Either you know more than you're letting on, or can provide evidence to the contrary? Perhaps the pot was laced with something? Do we know if they did a tox screen? Or do we just have the words on the page to go by? We also do not know what, if any, preexisting psychiatric conditions she had, or was being medicated for, for that matter. All of which co…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:41 AM
2

Not that I've found thus far in the Indiana statute.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:03 AM
1

Perhaps you should check the comments on the article before making that assertion which is false. You might also want to check the comments in the Indy Star found here: http://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2014/11/07/woman-cut-mans-penis-avoids-jail/18638595/
/r/MensRights11/11/14 01:33 AM
2

You do know being stoned isn't a defense, correct? It's hard to tell snark and sarcasm absent nonverbals that account for the majority of our communicative skills. If this woman, while stoned had killed someone, she'd be no less responsible in the eyes of the law.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 01:29 AM
4

They'd probably chalk it up to prosecutorial discretion, which, when I called the actual DA today in Johnson County Indiana where the case was prosecuted, I was connected to a Woman DA. Whether she handled the case I've yet to find out, but I'll wait for a return call as I left a rather nice voicemail suggesting I was going to call the Attorney General, as well as the judicial disciplinary board with regard to this matter. I've already emailed DOJ, FBI, to inquire about charges, and will keep pu…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 12:01 AM
1

I'm still digging in Indiana penal code. Someone else will have to research that.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 11:55 PM
2

I was referring to the lifelong psychological terror now instilled in this victim as a direct result of his injury. Whether or not there is law pertaining to such in Indiana I've yet to be able to find.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 11:46 PM
5

You might want to look up stimulant psychosis. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01496.x/abstract;jsessionid=E8DF00BB001804D74590D835B9D40D2D.f02t03?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:51 PM
2

Would you be laughing had the victim been a woman having her labia sliced off?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:28 PM
11

Yea, I'm wondering if she ingested a hallucinatory substance (Meth) that might account for her "suspicions." Even if that were the case, she's no less legally responsible for her actions. That the DA didn't do a full court press on all 3 really is infuriating.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:26 PM
4

Remind me again what the 9/11 hijackers used to take over the planes? And it would be intimidation, "IC 35-45-2-1 Intimidation Sec. 1. (a) A person who communicates a threat to another person, with the intent: (1) that the other person engage in conduct against the other person's will; (2) that the other person be placed in fear of retaliation for a prior lawful act; or (3) of causing: (A) a dwelling, a building, or another structure; or (B) a vehicle; to be evacuated; commits intimidation, a Cl…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:16 PM
14

I can't believe there weren't kidnapping charges, terroristic threat/terrorism charges, drug charges among the obvious assault with a deadly weapon charge for all of the involved. Need to dig into this and find out all the pertinent information. Need to light up the Indiana Attorney General office and make them pressure the DA to go after the others involved. I'm awaiting a call back from the state attorney general. This is total horseshit. Hmm, seeing how the feds could charge kidnapping due to…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 08:04 PM
1

That wasn't what I was saying, and it was driving at the point of doing away with having to prove anything in the name of equality while simultaneously getting the legislature in Utah, as well as the Judiciary to realize that marriage has been on the decline, cohabiting couples are on the rise, and that even as out of wedlock birth rates seem to keep falling, they're still quite prevalent. The laws are outdated and due to antiquated thinking. It would help if someone did an investigative review …
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:38 PM
1

Ok, so I summarized, when the facts are this, plainly and explicitly, "¶9 In the summer of 2010, Bolden was involved in a sexual re-lationship with S.B. The two were not married. S.B. eventually got pregnant. Approximately two weeks before the baby was born, In re Adoption of J.S. Opinion of the Court 4 Bolden filed a petition in the district court seeking to adjudicate paternity and to establish custody, parent time, and child support. ¶10 Bolden‘s unsigned, unverified petition asserted that he…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:40 PM
1

The ACLU opposed North Dakota's Shared parenting bill. They're in the feminist hip pocket.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:28 PM
1

Reading the brief, I understand the paperwork was inaccurate, however, the contentious part for me is him having to prove anything given Megan Huntsman who killed 6, possibly more didn't have to prove a damned thing.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:05 PM
1

Exactly, which is why the failure of measure 6 in North Dakota Tuesday was quite a disappointment. It's why fraudulent adoptions such as this, and the others I've listed are infuriating. There's nothing equal about the clandestine methods employed by the mothers of our children facilitated by the states notoriously antiquated laws, thinking, and gender stereotyping.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:11 PM
1

Hmm, that's not the case in divorce now is it? Do you not think that same assumption leads to the very custody disparity we have? I'm pretty sure there's a positive correlation between that assumption and custody outcomes. Also, the dissent in this case disagrees with you. http://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/supopin/Bolden20141114.pdf I just disagree, and refuse to be gullible where children are concerned. I've seen too much in my life to presume innocence. Needless to say I'll not be sitting on an…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:05 PM
2

That was rhetorical, this is just like the Terry Achane case, Baby Veronica case, Baby Desirai case. All without the knowledge of the fathers.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:03 PM
1

I love how the legislatures are so far behind given the rise of cohabiting couples, divorce stats and the like. I understand the history, and the notion that the mother is known, and the father may not. However, this is just one of many abuses of law by domineering women who think they, and they alone have dominion over life, children and family. Why didn't she tell him she was considering adoption?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 08:35 PM
1

They'll probably apply the same ludicrous standard they did in the Baby Veronica case regarding "continued custody." In that case, however, it was laughably inapplicable as no man can have continued custody of a woman's uterus for one. For two, they said he provided no meaningful support when in fact she rejected support which isn't the same thing. Additionally, he didn't owe her a dime until paternity was established, nor would Dusten Brown's military benefits have extended to her in the absenc…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:54 PM
1

I know that the majority aren't like the above cases, that they are in fact outliers. However, assumptions about either men or women with respect to gender roles are inappropriate. The first assumption is fine, the second I have a huge problem with. This case and many others exemplify just how devastating the consequences of those can be. Also note Terry Achane, Baby Desirai, Baby Veronica, and many others across the nation. Those assumptions are why men are losing their children. You can't assu…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:24 PM
2

That's not what you said though is it? You said, "The assumption that a woman who hasn't had an abortion is willing to either raise her child or make an adoption plan isn't a bad one." Actually, it's quite a horrendous assumption given the above two cases, and how many dumpster babies? That's part of the entire problem, that assumption as it assumes she's more fit/willing from the outset merely by carrying the child. It has no place in American Jurisprudence. Given the statistical fact that more…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:04 PM
2

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/utah-woman-arrested-7-dead-babies-found-article-1.1755428 http://www.cbsnews.com/news/massachusetts-woman-held-without-bail-after-3-dead-babies-found/ That's a load of crap. Women deserve no more consideration of fitness/ability than men.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:08 PM
6

http://www.sltrib.com/news/1782740-155/bolden-court-adoption-paternity-birth-affidavit From the article, unwed fathers must sign an affidavit saying they are able and willing to support the child, however, it's presumed unwed mother's will. If this isn't systemic sexism I don't know what the hell is. "The opinion rejects the argument that the affidavit discriminates against unmarried fathers because unmarried mothers are not required to provide similar assurances about how they will care for and…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:40 PM
1

oh, I know, but over 2/3 of their clients are low income women, hence the chuckle.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:24 PM
3

I know some fellow MRA/MHRA will get a chuckle out of this, but I'm partially being serious. Has this guy contacted legal aid? Is he eligible?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:10 PM
4

I think to disregard the science regarding cognitive and emotional development of boys and girls in your analysis is an error. It's been scientifically demonstrated that girls mature faster than boys in both areas mentioned above. To suggest then that adolescent boys are any more prepared for sexual trysts with fully mentally developed adults in a position of authority is neglectful of reality. If anything, they're less prepared emotionally and cognitively, as demonstrated by science. That's not…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:19 PM
1

It just worked for me before I posted it. Clicked on it myself also, and it works. So what do you mean dead end?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:34 PM
2

http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/Harvard_Mental_Health_Letter/2011/March/understanding-the-stress-response
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:51 PM
1

As in initiating violence, as denoted by Whitaker 2007. When you initiate violence it does provoke a response. It's called fight or flight. Feminists typically conflate that too in research, such as Kimmel.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:47 PM
1

I know they like to deny women are provocatively violent, yet history says differently. They can try to deflect all they want. GWW in her debate with Naomi Wolf spoke directly to that fact.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:39 PM
6

Actually, we need to discuss how feminism has conflated the evolutionary need for violence/protection/aggression with "toxic masculinity."
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:26 PM
5

The only reason she's crying is because she got caught.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:16 PM
1

Exactly. I sure hope they do, but the problem is not only would they be opposing their peers, they'd in effect become a pariah. There is an old expression about taking the right path being a lonely road.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:41 PM
1

Sadly, you're correct about bureaucrats. If they're anything like Texas cops who refuse to enforce criminal code pertaining to child custodial interference/visitation who consistently insist it is a civil matter, it's going to be a long hard fight to get them to do their jobs.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 01:27 PM
1

Be my guest. I'm busy waging war with some of the lawyers on their facebook page shooting down their erroneous claims and statistics. They keep trying to suggest that this measure puts parents rights first. My contention is that "fitness" of the parent and child's "best interest" aren't mutually exclusive. Somehow though they've got this warped perception of reality. Even when you challenge them on the concept of "primary" caregiver, which granted may be the case, it's as if to suggest that the …
/r/MensRights23/10/14 01:23 PM
1

As much as I can empathize with your situation. I think the best thing your guy can do is get another part time job if he can and save that money for the court battle/possible custody battle. I would also encourage you both to sit down and reassess your finances and really think about where all your money goes, if it's necessary or not, and if not, can you cut it out to save money. Obviously you'll need to consult a lawyer in these matters. Regrettably, unwed fathers have less rights than marrie…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 02:44 AM
1

Child abuse statistics denote a 2:1 ration of women abusers to men. It's with men's rights insofar as women by and large are presumed to be the better parents, and in fact end up predominantly with physical custody. That myth needs to die. Men also have protective instincts for their children.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 11:42 PM
1

No one is making any assumptions. There's a pretty detailed account of the story with documentation. Notice I said "story" not fact.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 11:42 PM
1

Morally, I wouldn't think that's appropriate no. I felt I needed to expand on why I think no. I look at this similarly to those who would oppose a criminal profiting from their crime. It's just not something I could condone.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 09:42 PM
2

I think they should to prevent paternity fraud in married couples of which approximately 120,000 men annually end up paying for children conceived in affairs. With the legal standard for married couples being the husband is presumed the father, a law compelling DNA tests at birth could change who pays for illicit conduct as well as save men in the long run.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 07:49 PM
3

I would also advise you to ask any attorney you consult to check into whether or not it's legal for you to record events should she breach the TRO. As others have said, do not, under any circumstances contact her or her family as it will likely be used against you in court. In fact, as a preemptive measure, I'd get on your social media, delete and block all contact from her, her friends, her family to protect yourself from any future allegations she might try to press. Or, if you want to go a st…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:30 PM
1

You're welcome. Pardon my initial typo (You're) duh (your) as I've read too much and not had enough coffee today. I think I found a new hobby, exposing feminist lies. It should be against the law to have this much fun.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 04:54 AM
1

Done deal.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 04:49 AM
1

Clinical denial, delusional?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:01 AM
2

I'd get in contact with the group pushing the measure. I'm sure they could use financial support. Other than that I'm not sure. http://lw4sp.org/ In fact, they have a donate button right on their page. As well as a way to join. I think people should check it out. Many of the women who are affiliated with MRM seem to be equally affiliated with this.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 11:28 PM
1

We need not shy away from our adversaries. We need to engage them, confront them with the facts. It's the only way to change the discourse. It may be too late for Mr. Kimmel, but personally, I'm the kind of guy who doesn't stop trying to save people.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:49 PM
0

I'm aspiring to be as loquacious as you hehe.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 06:07 PM
1

Here are couple thoughts for your collective • Enact or pursue legislation mandating a DNA test for every birth annually in the United States. (roughly 4 million) Per this link, though not sure of its accuracy http://www.divorcestatistics.info/latest-infidelity-statistics-of-usa.html the DNA tests could alleviate 120,000 men from paying for children surreptitiously conceived in illicit affairs by duplicitous women who’ve no compunction defrauding a man so long as her conduct isn’t exposed. I wou…
/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:41 PM
6

How's this:http://wordpress.clarku.edu/dhines/files/2012/01/Hines-Brown-and-Dunning-2007-DAHM.pdf And it's by a female academic no less. Or perhaps you can look at Dr. Murray Straus's literature here:http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ipv-violence-by-women.htm Or perhaps you can look up Dr. Don Dutton, Dr. Richard Gelles, Dr. Daniel Whitaker. Perhaps you could look up the child maltreatment reports which denote women perpetrate abuse at an almost 2:1 ratio.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:21 PM
1

The reason I tried is to have him put his own words out, limited though they may be, to demonstrate his inability to be intellectually honest or potentiality to be what I'd call delusional in not seeing that it isn't necessarily about mutual violence, when it's actually about mutual intent. Like it or not, and I don't, but he is one person who influences policy that many are seeking to change.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 03:06 PM
1

Well, I only say this as a child abuse survivor, but when I was in a group home type facility around 8, an adolescent male with a colostomy bag took advantage of me. I didn't recall it until I was in my 30's. It wasn't the only instance, as there were instances perpetrated by women as well, but I'm a guy, so I think there are legitimate concerns with regard to child sex abuse that we have to be extremely vigilant, and cautious about when making laws. I'm aware there are numerous false allegation…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:16 PM
1

Only thing I'd change about the rape reporting is barring memory suppression, or physical injury causing said memory to be suppressed.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 03:50 AM
1

lol love this. Needed the chuckle given all the crap I've read the last month. If only more level headed women would think this way.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 03:45 AM
1

So in other words, women refuse to adhere to the same standard they demand of men? Ok, gotcha.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 03:06 AM
2

That bias and set of assumptions are part of the cause of the mass public delusion engulfing too many people.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 12:03 AM
1

How this correlates specifically with the men's rights movement is about, as I said, trust and honesty, in addition to Karen Straughan's catchy "owning your shit," blog title. Imagine if this girl had gotten someone a prison sentence because she mistakenly thought it was ok to lie? It's about behavioral conditioning. People who lie like this have no compunction about potentially ruining people's lives as well as does a disservice to other real victims, because this person was doing lord knows wh…
/r/MensRights11/10/14 12:00 AM
1

When the assumed predominant perpetrators of sex crimes are men, yes, this is a men's rights issue. Try looking up the prevailing definition of rape for the last 200 years, and you'll see it was purposely crafted as to exclude women as perpetrators, and men from being victims. As far back as 1840, early on in the women's suffrage movement, women helped shape the laws regarding rape. It's all documented online if you'd simply look. The mass public delusion that women can't/don't rape has to die, …
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:42 PM
1

My response to your example is probably not going to be well received but frankly I don't care. How about women adhere to the same trite nonsense they tell men. If you don't want to get pregnant, don't have sex. There's your birth control.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 08:33 PM
1

I'm writing a blog, and am trying to track all this down on my own. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Good lord this thing is going to be a huge powerpoint presentation.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 06:36 PM
1

Given that it's 20 years later, and at the time of the incident she was 16, makes her 36. Remember all those commercials, spots, or ads saying that if a woman says no at any time up to and including, then it's rape to proceed. Well, the fact that she's 36 now and doesn't comprehend that would equally apply to men is simply staggering. She's clearly delusional in her beliefs from a clinical standpoint and has been for two decades. I'd get help if I were her. Thanks for the astute observation, bec…
/r/MensRights10/10/14 06:14 PM
1

Betty Friedan, well known, prominent feminist actually opposed the development/marketing of the male birth control pill. There's a video to that effect on youtube where one of the scientists developing it overseas speaks specifically to it. There's also a 2006 article in the guardian discussing why feminists and women oppose a male birth control pill. Quite ironically, some of the same things men have complained about were similar concerns raised in the guardian piece, yet, when men complain abo…
/r/MensRights09/10/14 08:58 PM
2

Perhaps you can explain then why some who claim affiliation with feminism, as well as the head of the feminist movement, the National Organization of Women, continue to oppose shared parenting? Or why they downplay rapes and abuse of men in domestic settings? Until feminism owns that crap, and deals with it, all the rhetoric in the world won't sway those who see the truth of feminism being about female privilege.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 06:46 PM
1

I can't believe feminists are willing to eat their own out of the fear this will also help men. How pathetic.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 10:13 PM
11

This is absolutely pathetic. That she's married to the man whose kids she murdered is incomprehensible. But mothers are always the better parents.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 08:10 PM
1

Thanks for that link.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 06:15 PM
3

Yea, I thought that was humorous myself. I also think the notion of SAHM being paid to watch their own kids, and clean their own homes as equally laughable.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 01:13 AM
4

I'm well aware some who identify as feminists have a rather contemptuous proprietary mindset with respect to their children. However, children are not possessions of either parent. If enough people get involved, then perhaps that message will be sent loud and clear. It's time to stand up in North Dakota and let your voices be heard.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:57 AM
3

If you're in North Dakota and want to see this happen then it's time to get in touch with your legislators.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:33 AM
2

I already posted this to NOW's Facebook page, Dr. Phil, all over CNN anchor pages as I'm damned tired of the sexist one sided feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter