TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

viiScorp Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by viiScorp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

For me what was alarming is that feminist movements aren't pushing anti-forced circumcision here in the US, even though usually they also claim feminist will help solve men's issues. I actually lost a friend because I believed circumcision counted as a form of sexism against men in this country. (I also believe the same applies to intersex people) She believed its not systemic, you know, despite it being ingrained in the culture that a part of men's bodies is 'extra', probably the quintessential…
/r/ExRedPill09/04/23 06:59 PM
1

Let me know when feminists do something about MGM, if feminism is about equality its not showing it at all. You don't need to create doctrine to fight against gender or sex inequality. You don't need an ideology. You just need to stand up for whats right. Which apparently is incredibly difficult to do when it comes to male issues, while MGM is done every day in this country its hardly mentioned when it should literally be #1 on the list. Followed by the dying yet still breathing fight against wo…
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:59 PM
7

I find it strange how little this is discussed in this sub. It's easily the biggest issue of sexism against men. Legally removing parts of men's sex organs from them without their consent, when the weakest form of FGM is illegal and less destructive biologically. Its fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:34 PM
3

A lot of feminists seem to hold feminism as their religion whether they realize it or not. Insulting feminism is an insult to them, they can't be wrong, etc
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:30 PM
2

The sub Is mainly young people, people have taken polls there before. Anyway, why would they debate you if they can't win? (also goes for religious people as well-go figure)
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:26 PM
4

Yeah, because this sub isn't angry, and anger is somehow wrong. Intentionally hurting religion if you think religion is wrong makes total sense. Naturally r/atheism is going to have a good amount of anti-theists.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:25 PM
1

/r/debateanatheist is great. You could say its biased towards atheists which naturally it is since mainly atheists are on the defensive there. Mostly people may see it biased as at least when I visited there there weren't a whole lot of religious people actually trying to present an argument. Not to say questions are bad though.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:24 PM
1

Community because some people literally cannot talk to anyone in person about their beliefs or lack thereof.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:21 PM
1

Really? Source? :D. Wouldn't be surprised, for overall rate at least. I know some areas are like 30% and stuff.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:03 AM
3

This photograph is from the Philippines where almost all young boys have their penises mutilated for nothing other than social pressure. Oh, like the US... :/
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:31 PM
3

If it's not medically necessary then of course fucking not.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:00 AM
2

Good: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=21672947 http://news.menshealth.com/is-your-circumcision-making-you-soft/2011/11/02/
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:58 PM
6

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17155977 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:54 PM
7

1.) Many believe it is medically necessary. (even though it is of course not by any measure except in a minority of circumstances) 2.) People still accept mythology like Judaism or Islam as justification. 3.) Many males are in denial and don't want to admit what they have lost. 4.) Parents are in denial and don't want to admit the harm they did to their sons. 5.) Biased doctors: http://www.jmhjournal.org/article/S1875-6867(10)00050-3/abstract These two studies should be enough to make any moral …
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:45 PM
4

Forced to at gunpoint, etc.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:26 AM
1

I still don't understand why kicking someone there without necessity (defense or something) is EVER acceptable.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:45 PM
1

/r/mensrightslinks
/r/MensRights20/11/12 10:26 PM
14

No True Scotsman fallacy, anyone?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:11 PM
8

Again that doesn't make it justified. People in this thread are saying that its immoral/sexist not that they don't understand why it is done. Also a public school shouldn't be allowed to do that. 14th amendment. Private can do that but again legality for that isn't what is in question.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:38 AM
9

What's the ratio of women verse men enrolled at the school? What is the minority percentage of enrollment? Why on earth does this matter? "Oh no! There are less women than men in my school! Therefore I should make it easier to get in!" That doesn't justify it.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:05 AM
31

That's what he said.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:17 AM
1

Ya, like the mod "dancingwiththestars" : "I told you that that suggesting an equivalence between misandry and misogyny is oppressive, which it is." AKA "The fact that you even believe there are issues on both sides is oppressing me!!!!111" wtf? Further in the same post: "There is no societal discrimination and oppression against men. " I don't even.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:03 AM
2

You're definitely right. I'm not saying he wouldn't be called names that are gender-hating specific, I'm just saying that Amanda was as well. The world's a fucked up place. It's shitty to see people who think people can just pull themselves up by their bootstraps or be called weak when they are depressed. :/
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:59 AM
1

My point is (and I agree with your post) is that if it was a guy, he wouldn't be called a whore or slut.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:28 AM
1

Well, people are calling Amanda whore and slut so... But ya, /r/atheimplus sucks if you want to even have a rational discussion where you are in disagreement-you don't get to disagree.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:12 AM
0

I'm sure many if not most have good intentions, but I really don't think they're going along it the right way. As a fair warning to anyone here, their subreddit /r/AtheismPlus is a "safe space/zone" so you will be kicked out if you don't agree with them. (all I tried to do is a have a conversation about using the word feminist and was banned)
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:34 PM
2

The issue with circumcision still being considered valid is that it's considered expressing your religious freedom when it shouldn't be The mythological/religious justification are, of course, archaic and barbabic, but the thing is, is that parents don't need either a medical justification or religious BS, they can just say "we want him to look like his father". It's horrible.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:51 PM
1

Nobody has ever died from ED I don't think you realize how big of a deal it is to have sexual impotency problems.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:49 PM
3

"So unless [circumcision is] required for religious or cultural reasons, this decision should be made when an adult can decide whether or not he wishes it done. I believe many newborns would say amen to that." Replace "circumcision" with foot binding or pricking of the clitoris and re-read it.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:41 PM
2

Please upvote this guys, this is what people need to see.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:30 AM
1

Yes. Unfortunately it's incredibly hard to break something that is so deeply rooted in tradition/religion. I find comfort in not knowing why it was done for me, if its the latter two I would probably get violent, understandably.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:49 PM
3

This is off topic, but considering the subreddit I'm in: "Innocence until proven guilty" is also often thrown out the door with circumcision. It's not our job to show that the foreskin is necessary, it is the job of the accusers to show beyond reasonable doubt that it is medically necessary to remove it (medically beneficial for a small % of people at the cost of pleasure and sanity is not necessary/justified!)... God, the sad world we live in. And the US is supposed to be progressive...
/r/MensRights11/10/12 10:22 PM
6

YEP. Can't laugh if it's a female having parts of her genitals chopped away without her consent but you can laugh if its a male! Fucking doublestandards.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 10:19 PM
0

The reasoning that MGM is okay? Culture I guess. Same reason why racism was normal. People are often products of their environments and as such often blindly follow the norms of their culture...
/r/MensRights08/04/12 05:36 PM
24

You forgot: Male Genital Mutilation being legal? Oh well, Female Genital Mutilation is usually worse.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 06:11 PM
3

Well, for one, the vast majority of people force genital mutilation on their male children for a variety of complete myths. It's pretty fucking sad. Preference, inconclusive studies and religion are NOT FUCKIN' EXCUSES. /rant
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:26 AM
5

Take my fucking upvote I love you. No one talks about this and it's truly depressing. I almost wish I could go back to before even knowing I was genitally mutilated after birth against my will. People act like I shouldn't feel hopeless and depressed about it and yet they expect chicks that get Type 1 genital mutilation on them to. Fuck this double standard.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter