TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

viyacondios Archive

View 1 posts and 33 comments by viyacondios on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

LTRviyacondios/r/TheRedPill15/11/17 04:55 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Science at its core involves making falsifiable claims. If I propose a theory, there needs to be an experiment that could prove it wrong. That which explains everything, explains nothing.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/18 01:41 PM
2

I don't have any readings but I can list the things that come to mind. Find a woman where there's definite mutual attraction, but not intense chemistry from the start. Where it seems like you're both into each other, but neither person is more so than the other. Take an honest and complete inventory of what you need in a partner to happily be in an LTR with them. This could be anything from being financially reliable, enthusiastically taking anal every day, sharing your hobby of mountain biking,…
/r/TheRedPill22/09/18 05:59 AM
1

Her boundary is no sex without relationship, and in turn there are requirements she needs to meet to earn my exclusivity. Healthy people maintain reasonable personal boundaries. From a mindset of abundance I choose to operate within her exclusivity frame, and from the mindset of trust thus enabled she chooses to operate within my frame. There was a post here a while ago talking about how much of a liability a frame-less woman will be to your life. She'll help anyone and everyone and thus have li…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/18 05:09 AM
2

I agree. I'm in an LTR with a quality woman because at the start of dating, half blue pilled me tolerated things like her insistence after our first sleepover that we be sexually exclusive. If I was dating new women now I wouldn't agree to that, and thus my red pilled attitude would preclude the development of an LTR with a desirable woman. On the flipside, being red pilled now is a key component in the ongoing success of our LTR.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/18 04:32 AM
2

I agree about the self-respecting and emotionally stable women. My LTR has been upfront about her boundary that she won't share her partner with anyone else, and I respect that. I've admittedly shit tested her about this in the past but in the end the value she brings to my life makes the tradeoff worth it! I am upfront about my boundary that I expect my exclusive partner (barring reasonable health concerns) to enthusiastically have whatever kind of sex I want, whenever and however often I want …
/r/TheRedPill15/09/18 12:58 AM
14

As a corollary to this, I've found women enjoy being moved around as part of the old in & out rhythm. While thrusting quickly and hard, the guy can do a combined movement where he thrusts + pulls her a few inches into him, then push her back, then repeat, etc.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/18 07:45 PM
3

Interesting thoughts. I suppose another way excess men were dealt with historically was sending them off to die in wars. I'm four episodes into the tv show The Handmaid's Tale, and while I'm sure most people (myself included) find the fascist society horrifying, the main thing that sticks out at me is how we can arrive at that society if a populist incel movement gets started.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/18 12:35 PM
1

Oh with that FWB it wasn't love for either of us, just great sex. Yeah it's true that love can (at least temporarily) blind a woman to a guy's faults. I'm reminded of that recent hilarious post about Stacy's Credo!
/r/TheRedPill22/04/18 02:50 AM
1

That's a great point. It's not even strictly necessary for you to be the best she's ever had/experienced in a given category; a lot of benefit comes if you're on the top end of what she can generally find. I had a quite high n-count FWB who I'm sure has seen nicer & bigger dicks than mine, but spontaneously commented a number of times about how and why she loved mine. Still, I'm glad my LTR is very low n-count so that in the above and other categories I'm the best she's experienced.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/18 09:30 PM
3

Another comment comes to mind. For guys who (are in a phase of or just in general) prefer short term dating only, "take whatever you get or start from scratch" can be fine. You don't need to optimize a dynamic/set expectations with a new woman because regardless of whether it's perfect sex men are programmed to enjoy new partners, ie the Coolidge Effect. And rest assured that among all the different lovers you will find your kinks covered (but probably not from one person, or even all available …
/r/TheRedPill21/04/18 06:04 AM
2

Interesting, I never thought of it that way. Perhaps more investment on my part isn't necessarily a path to lost leverage.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/18 05:31 AM
1

This is a very good point. What other tools do we have? Does our power still come from our willingness to next someone if they aren't meeting our needs, but is applied by working with the LTR to help her get to where she is doing so?
/r/TheRedPill20/04/18 11:44 PM
9

I'm never been affiliated with them but that sounds like the Mormon church. I think in this case religion would be an improvement (I'm usually vehemently atheist).
/r/TheRedPill16/02/18 10:46 PM
2

Give Bumble a try; I was somewhat similar to you and had more success with that app than with OKC.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/18 06:16 PM
2

Would make a good Black Mirror episode!
/r/TheRedPill18/01/18 01:39 AM
2

I have to laugh because I was once rejected by a very attractive, fit, had-her-shit-together woman who had neurofibromatosis. The first date chemistry we had resulted in lots of enthusiastic (clothes-on) physical contact, but the next day she didn't like the idea that she was the kind of girl who enjoyed having her hair gently pulled while making out. (I think she was unsettled because she hadn't ever met someone who gave her those tingles.) Shame, I really liked her. Anyway, scratch-and-dent (o…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/18 01:18 AM
1

I think you've hit the nail on the head: women reserve the right to completely destroy a man if they don't get the commitment they want. This is how I'd play devil's advocate and hamster it like they would. A guy accepting sex without intending to (or indeed feeling forced to regardless of how the two people's dynamic grows) give commitment is being duplicitous. Analogous to how pulling a dine-and-dash at a restaurant is a crime; they're both examples of fraud. While a generalization, we can say…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 01:55 PM
0

I'm not disagreeing with you, because I don't know the best answers for everything, but this is how I would describe it: Strive to be completely comfortable with women doing nice things for you. For example, ever been receiving head from a girl and even though she seems fine, you are feeling bad about her doing all the work just for you, and you decide to proceed to starting sex? Don't give into that feeling; be selfish and let her continue for however long it takes you to finish. Some women lov…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 08:25 PM
1

In my field (technical) the work is challenging and it's hard to find competent colleagues. My competent colleagues comprise people of both genders. (Yes that's actually true; I don't get the idea discussed here that women are useless in the workplace. Maybe because my workplace hires based on merit.) With scarce merit as my only selection criteria, I'd be a fool to purposefully ignore either half of humanity!
/r/TheRedPill21/12/17 04:49 PM
4

I think this is exactly the right approach. You only get the relationship you tolerate, so don't tolerate a bad deal for even a moment. (As you mention above, reasonable explanations (like she's sick) aside.) It's possible that having rock solid boundaries will make you more attractive to her, but that's not the main point. The main thing is that (a) maintaining those boundaries means (b) requiring her ongoing sexuality and general effort, which (c) she can't/won't give if she doesn't continue t…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/17 04:40 PM
9

An unrelated aside: I never got how the Ghostbusters reboot, obviously meant to be SJW with respect to gender, wasn't at all SJW with respect to race.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/17 04:13 PM
4

I think the trick here is to be ever vigilant. You get the relationship you tolerate. If sex becomes even a bit less frequent then you want, if for the first time you hear a complaint about giving a BJ, you talk with her about it. But if through talking you can't find a mutually agreeable solution that leads to what you want, end the relationship.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 04:53 AM
1

Little voice recorders shaped like a USB stick are $20 on Amazon. I wonder if in certain situations this kind of info could change a divorce settlement.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/17 11:22 PM
1

Sounds like it's best to avoid women with kids, and to never give a woman kids. While she'll never love you, at least you can avoid the dilution of her attention. Just another example of how giving a woman what she wants just hurts the man.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 02:51 PM
1

It could've been, but perhaps she just needed to run. Again, keep in mind I'm no expert. I've often erred on the side of caution and waited until things are more clear on a later date because there was a risk of being too forward. Even though in some cases hindsight shows me I could've made an earlier move successfully. Sometimes I have made earlier moves. It comes from experience, being able to read the situation. The read on the situation wasn't clear to you, and you are still learning. Don't …
/r/TheRedPill11/12/17 06:13 AM
3

In my past, with new women I'd be too nervous, perhaps not initiate enough physical stuff in the first few dates. Typical spergy over-active amygdala causing me to freeze up when I wanted to act. Here is my guide to overcoming that hangup, if you happen to have it. BTW coffee dates are just awkward! Ask a woman out for a drink (drink not drinks) for a first date, and extend the date if you like her. Walking together from one bar to another on a Friday night is a million times more conducive a se…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/17 02:36 AM
2

I like to call this a tinkerer personality. Wanting to understand how and why things work. Not all men have it, really; I've seen women in technical fields who do have it, at least in the form which is driven by the desire to achieve a technical goal. Sometimes I like to ramble on about something technical to my LTR, mostly because I enjoy expressing the technical ideas, but also because (a) her willingness to listen to something boring is an act of service she can do for me, and (b) she's enoug…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/17 12:52 AM
1

I like the way of describing it as early frame announcements.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/17 06:06 PM
1

I'd argue that women who are prime LTR material are worth a little deeper consideration and effort, if LTRs are what suit you. If they don't, I totally get that. I agree that she should be spontaneously doing things for you, but I'm also reminded of the recent thread here about relative SMV. I've dated women below me in SMV and I know the feeling of their being completely invested. I've also tried to date women above me in SMV and had to move on when they failed to show solid interest. My curren…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/17 06:00 PM
1

The I vs you distinction is a good one, I like it. EDIT: Why this topic is on my mind, is I believe I have turned around a one year LTR. I was in a position where sex was frequent and enthusiastic but not quite perfect for me, so I decided she just wasn't right for me, and in a very chill way I visited and broke up with her. She had had some time to think about this problem so in a solicitous but not desperate way she argued for us to attempt a fix. (And this included me investing more into anot…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/17 05:51 PM
2

I agree. The theme of my post is that you're not a bad person and it's actually in everyone's best interest to walk away from an arrangement that is or becomes sub-optimal, whether today or 20 years from now. It could be that you're not a good lover for her, she's getting dick elsewhere, or that she's inexperienced/low n-count and needs your guidance. My theory is that some women need to see your spine (aka conviction) before they'll feel a genuine desire to please you, but it will be genuine. I…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/17 02:02 PM
2

I really like this post; something related has been bouncing around in my head for a while. Earlier in life I did the typical anxious-personality-related mistake of trying to control situations so that my desired outcome would occur. I learnt that this approach is unattractive, unhealthy, and futile. For a while after that I felt like I was a chill non-controlling person; responsible for myself and my mental state, but not able to have much effect on the outside world. (By outside world I mean w…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/17 10:08 PM
1

Perhaps faking emotional problems can be done as a sort of monkey-branch test, to see how likely a woman is to drop you. The women who are more principled than others won't immediately leave, and thus this test will identify them as better potential partners (if a partner is what you're looking for). Then you go back to the strong frame and their visceral attraction for you returns. Potential pitfalls I see to this: (a) It might select for lazy/sunk cost type people as well. (b) Their attraction…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/17 09:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter