TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

whittlingman Archive

View 4 posts and 729 comments by whittlingman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Those are going to be banned by the same crazy religious people trying to ban abortion. They Hate ALL sex and literally want people to not have any sex because the punishment for sex is pregnancy. The human race has spend centuries using science inventing ways to allow us to have all the fun sex we want, and these religious idiots want to ban it all over their dumb religions.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/22 05:26 PM
-2

It literally says what business they work for … it’s not planned parenthood.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/22 05:24 PM
-7

….you do know the morning after pill is abortion, and would be banned along with anything else. Also states banning abortion have laws they want to roll out next banning birth control pills. So no, it IS Hard to do things that seem incredibly easy if crazy religious people get to make laws banning all those things because “sex bad”.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/22 05:24 PM
2

Soooo vague Like did you demand she make you dinner and she said no? Or is she just going on and on about how women are the bestest ever and the patriarchy is trying to keep women down and your part of the problem and is constantly verbally abusing you? What’s the actual issue here that you’re experiencing?
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/22 03:24 PM
25

You’ve failed to understand, the point of the GIF being posted here. The problem isn’t the woman in the GIF, she’s not the “anti-feminism” issue in the, she is just as you say “a shit person” The “anti-feminist” issue and why this GIF is here is the one picture of the GIF where the woman after divorce is holding the two large money bags. That is due to Feminism. Women a) used to not be able to get divorced, b) got nothing if they got divorced, c) were looked down upon by society for being divorc…
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/22 12:17 PM
1

You’re missing the point. I’m not demanding women “do something” I’m saying I will let a woman I know “there are ways to change what they look like”. The alternate to this is there is no “get a giant penis” surgery. It doesn’t exist, yet. And there is no realistically effective “get taller” surgery for men. However, men CAN go to the gym and workout and get muscular, which is fairly attractive. Women can’t work out and grow breasts, but they can work out, eat right, get fit AND get breasts impla…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/12/21 02:04 PM
1

Okay, that wasn’t really the point, but thanks for sharing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/12/21 03:40 AM
1

I wrote it off the top of my head in like 10 minutes. We have an editor here that can tighten it up before I post it?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/12/21 10:38 PM
2

I guess, we’re talking about different statistics. I’m talking about the statistic of how rare it would be for any man in the US to be hit with false allegations. You’re taking about the percentage of all allegations that are false. There aren’t that many allegations against men overall, so even while the false amount may be high, the likely hood of it happening to any random man is low. Such that, no man, I have ever known in my entire life has been hit with false rape allegations and I know a …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/12/21 08:18 PM
2

The point of the post is narrowing down the exact anecdotal situation that might cause a woman to think “you are lucky” when they are obviously an average woman and not a 10 supermodel. And that thing is tinder and only dating matches and attention. It’s blowing women’s minds and they can’t handle it, they have no experience on how to deal with that much attention and makes them think “they are special”. Nope, still just a normal average woman.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/12/21 08:12 PM
2

The thing is they are “rare”, the problem people aren’t recognizing is they are MASSIVELY Destructive to the men that are affected by them. It’s basically like AIDS. Yes it’s rare, yes it effects a limited amount of people because it only spreads in certain limited ways. BUT, if it affects you, you Fucking DIE. That’s makes even something “rare”, very serious and needs to be dealt with and managed and resolved in society. They way people are treating false allegations against men today, is exact…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/12/21 08:08 PM
1

While I find it inconvenient that crossposts are disliked and now I have to screen shot this and repost it, however, The details of this comment/story are literally a component of the main theme of this subreddit. The First stage of “where are all the good men” is women creating way to high of a level of self esteem/self importance/value Due specifically to extreme levels of demand/attention/likes/matches/followers/messages on the internet/apps. No, normal woman who is a 6, in the 1990’s thought…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/12/21 07:58 PM
1

Ewww r/prolife, r/centrists, r/theleftcantmeme We need some more economic leftists who don’t support mens rights on here. Supporting MedicareForAll and a livable minimum wage doesn’t preclude someone from being anti-feminist (modern fourth wave feminism).
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/21 10:54 PM
12

Link to the actual interview?
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/21 03:20 PM
29

Didn’t anyone teach her, DONT put your face in your photos? That’s internet 101.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/12/21 09:24 PM
9

That’s circular logic. The point is you can submit “reports” for sexist comments. Those reports don’t go to some “Reddit police” department. They go to the mods of the subreddit. Then and only then so they get escalated to admins for further review. Hence No one getting banned from the sub for misandry because the mods are in on it. This guy literally called out a mod directly which is rare, and the mod straight up made sexist comments. Resulting in the issue, that there is NO ONE to report the …
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/21 05:32 AM
8

…. It’s literally entirely relevant. A mod isn’t going to ban themsleves. Because theyre a mod. A person reporting a mod for sexist comments is just reporting the mod to the mod themsleves. They’re a mod. That’s the point. It’s relevant.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/21 05:22 AM
12

…exactly, that was My point.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/21 04:43 AM
30

Wow that mod at that subreddit is awfully sexist against men to not have been banned already for hate speech. Oh yeah, they’re the mod.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 11:20 PM
0

Ahaha ahahahaha ahhahahahahahahahaha So stupid
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 11:49 PM
6

The result of watching too many Lifetime movies.
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 04:48 AM
26

It’s like you do work taking care of a home and children and the another human works at a job which provides money to make that home run, and then both humans get a well run home and healthy happy children. Amazing how so many women don’t get this basic concept.
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 04:47 AM
43

Apparently child care (for HER child) and some made up concept called “emotional labor”, despite the fact that women love to seek out drama and then decide to call that “labor”. Sounds like people trying to pad a resume with made up job roles.
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 04:45 AM
1

So you’re a vegan?
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/21 03:57 AM
1

Biologically you're wrong on both counts. No you are. Maybe try taking a remedial science course Exactly you should, they don’t teach basic science in church. sometime because you don't understand the scientific definition of life Which you need to learn what it is and how it doesn’t and doesn’t apply to a fetus or what constitutes a child. And you need to learn what this is, because according to the Bible AND basic science, a fetus is neither. You don’t have a burial for a fetus. That’s not how…
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/21 11:30 PM
7

What?
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/21 04:45 PM
1

Look, I don't know if you're just stupid or you live in a country where this actually happens, but in the US this is not a thing. The person you saved is more likely to sue you than give you money, like in the post I linked earlier. I live in America and if someone saved my life, I would reward them. I can’t do anything with my money if I’m dead. But if some random person legitimately saved my life from just dying in the street, I’d easy reward them with like $10k. Yes, a living human that is th…
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/21 11:42 PM
1

What makes you any more wanted than a fetus? Nothing, hence why are people fighting to make abortion illegal. The point being that even a “random” human adult isn’t specially wanted by society, so why all the emphasis on unborn fetuses. A stranger passing by has no relation to you. They don’t, BUT there’s a thing called a good Sumeritan, and calling 911, and doing CPR, then telling the paramedics or police etc who you are. Then the person giving you a reward in the form of money for saving their…
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/21 07:55 PM
1

The point anyone is making here is being anti-abortion or pro-choice, etc. My point IS to just throw all the unwanted fetuses in the nearest dumpster and move on. Because who knows. But if you see a person who clearly doesn’t look like a homeless bum, then give them CPR because they are established as something, a functioning part of society.
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/21 05:01 PM
1

Yes. That’s MY point. Other peoples points were about heartbeats or brain waves or souls being put into a fetus at the time of conception, etc. And your argument was if I don’t think fetuses life’s are worth saving why would you bother saving mine with CPR. Implying that I think all life is worthless to save, so that means mine is too, and if I want people to bother to save my life with CPR, I have to bother to save unborn fetuses from being aborted. And my retort to that, which is my opinion, i…
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/21 04:58 PM
1

What are you talking about? You said “why would I give you CPR?” You’re not a hospital or a doctor, so if you saved me with CPR I would give you a monetary reward for saving me.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 07:10 PM
1

What? How does that have to do with me demanding CPR and being then telling people they should have abortions?
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 05:45 PM
1

My money keeps working even while I’m unconscious. When I come too in the hospital, people get reward money for saving me, don’t save me no reward money. That’s the magic of money, it’s always convenient to other people, so I am always convenient to others.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 02:27 PM
1

I mean that’s just your opinion, man. In my opinion, my views are just plain obviously right. And yours are just plain wrong. The people compromising in the middle are the pro-choice people leaving it up the actual women who are pregnant.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 04:15 AM
1

Explain the hypocrite part? I’m stand 100% behind my stance.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 04:13 AM
1

I’m not pro-choice. I’m pro-abortion. Also, yes, people shouldn’t be wasting time giving homeless people CPR, letting them die is doing them a favor.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 03:57 AM
1

I’m just expressing my opinion after you expressed yours. I’m pro-abortion. Some people like to pretend to be pro-choice. I’m not, I’m pro-abortion.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 03:57 AM
0

Because It’s money. Babies don’t have money, so they can’t pay for healthcare. I do, so I matter.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 03:55 AM
1

I want society to get to the point where abortion is the first suggested thing a doctor recommends to a woman who is pregnant, then she and the father decide if it’s right for them to have a baby, are they good parents, are the financially stable, will it basically ruin their lives because they are 18 and have no business being parents etc. If they are in a good place and would be good parents then sure go ahead and have the kid, otherwise we recommend abortion. That’s a world I want to live in.…
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 01:22 AM
0

I have money, so yes you should perform medical CPR on me. Fetuses don’t have money, so brain activity is irrelevant. I don’t even think we should spend money on healthcare for premi early born babies. If you can’t even be born at the right time why are we spending literally 100,000s of dollars on you 5 seconds after your born. Those parents need to just have another baby and do it right this time.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/21 01:18 AM
2

No see, youre missing their logic. They can’t help the fact that they are mentally ill, MEN can’t refuse to date them, BUT they can control whether they date mentally I’ll men, so that means that’s a choice and is ok to do. What’s ok and not ok, always comes from what they can and can’t “change” or what they “feel is right or wrong” regardless of whether it actually is or if other people don’t agree or if it’s hypocritical or not.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 02:08 PM
1

Like I said it’s pretty weird. People magically make up how or what they think murder is, and then other people are deciding what control they have over their own bodies. You cant murder something that is part of you. If you’re growing something that is part of you and relies on your to function on a cellular level, then it’s not an independent life form. Hence you can chose to remove any part of your body you want whether it’s a fetus or a wart. Babies don’t become babies until they breath, unt…
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 01:10 AM
2

Calm down ma’am.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 12:02 AM
-4

Well that’s weird. You can be anti-feminist because super ultra modern feminism is sexist. But being pro-life is always weird and has no basis for being an opinion. It’s simply controlling of womens bodies and is obviously influence by religion. I’m pro-abortion, so maybe I just don’t get it, if there was something to get beyond the religious issues with it. Same with being LGBT, being anti-LGBT is just weird again, and there’s no basis for it other than religious nonsense. You don’t have to be …
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 12:01 AM
2

Exactly. BUT I will not pay a woman, who is not a “higher” number of hotness than I can normally “get”, for their attention. There’s no point/value in it for me. I can just go meet women in my normal “hotness” range for free by just being me. I’ll pay for women above that range for their attention, as I can’t normally get it. That’s my point.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/11/21 02:31 AM
15

You think you can get a wife that is as hot as hookers are? Either you don’t understand the point of hookers is that you’re paying above average women for your attractiveness level to have sex with you (where your wife is on par with your attractiveness level) OR you think hookers are ugly vs high class escorts are hot OR you are very attractive and wealthy and can marry very attractive women, so why pay hookers.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/21 06:19 AM
1

Are you stupid? I literally Emphasized that she was wrong, not sort of guessing but wasn’t sure, Meaning she THOUGHT she was right. There was no doubt in her mind. Only until it was proven otherwise does she realize she was wrong. The POINT is it WASNT malicious against that person they were just entirely wrong and mistaken. Which isn’t good in anyway, just due to stupidity and unawareness, not malice. Hello, it’s the whole fucking point of my comment.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/21 04:45 PM
2

The end result isn’t worse on a criminal scale. But on the “evil” scale I see what you mean. As in some murders are a person flipping out and murdering someone vs someone purposely and maliciously planning out and murdering someone for their own benefit. One is generally seen as much eviler than someone reacting overly emotionally in the moment and doing something. Losing control vs purposely doing something evil while having compel the control over your actions.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/21 12:01 AM
19

My biggest issue with them is the intent. How many rape accusations that are proven false and the accuser acknowledges it was false, were accidental. As in “I 100% thought it was that man, but it turned out to be a different man, I was mistaken, I was wrong, but I’m glad we cleared that up and the right man is now going on trial.” Rarely does anyone hear about situations like that. What you do hear, is “woman accuses man she dislikes with false rape accusation to hurt man on purpose and was tota…
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/21 06:13 PM
2

Because… Well A) they literally said fuck MRA’s which are mens right activists. Which are mainly (by percentage) in America straight white men. To which the same people fighting against the supposed “patriarchy” are fighting against supposed “systemic white privilege”. Which leads to the combined dislike of white men and throw in lgbt issues and you can likely assume they while being “pro lgbt” are somehow “anti straight” which become hating straight white men. B) It’s the implication of effort.…
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/21 04:17 PM
2

Wow, way to go out of your way to say you hate straight white men. Seems pretty racist and sexist if you ask me.
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/21 08:07 PM
1

No, buddy, you’re living in a fairytale of your own No u. and have unfortunately fallen into the sophistry fed to you by a minority of bitter, old men who dedicate their time to upholding an extreme caricature of half of the human population based on preconceived judgements and feed into the depiction of Western women as evil monsters and wanton sluts who have an innate desire to leech off men and go out of their way to make men’s lives as miserable as possible. Ma’am, ma’am, ma’am….I’m gonna ha…
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/21 04:12 PM
1

I keep repeating the same points because they are my only points. I said it several times. The only argument I’m making is that men have an extended length of fertility “on average” across all men, and women have a much shorter window of fertility “on average” across all women. That’s it. It’s as simple as women have menopause and men don’t, I don’t even have to go into more detail. But you can’t accept that fact. You keep arguing about every other detail of “levels” of fertility, or how age eff…
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/21 03:49 PM
1

Nudes?
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/21 03:57 AM
0

Nudes?
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/21 03:56 AM
2

Try the plumbing and sewer industry, it’s like 99.99999% male. Less women in boardrooms and more women in sewers!
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/21 03:53 AM
1

Bro, bro, bro. You’re just not getting this. Women literally have to be pregnant for nine months and pop out a healthy baby. If they can’t do that they are infertile. Miscarriage after miscarriage doesn’t equal fertile. Men can be 25% fertile and have sex 4 times, and bam, out pops a baby. For a woman to try have a baby 4 times at an advanced aged, thats at least a year. 4 months per pregnancy each resulting in a miscarriage. Women eggs and mens sperm can be this quality of that quality, you can…
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/21 09:10 PM
1

You’re welcome to live in YOURE fairytale. For some reason you have an abundant need to insist that NO woman would ever consider divorcing their husband because they decided they weren’t attracted to them anymore and want to go out and date/have sex with other men they find more attractive. Even though they are already married and have a family. But please tell me what girl, hasn’t dumped their boyfriend to go date/have sex with other more attractive men, because they were no longer attracted to…
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/21 08:53 PM
0

This is satire pointing out the opposite site of “a man denied sex by a woman because he has blue balls and is mad about it”. It’s sounds so stupid coming from a woman because it sounds equally as stupid coming from a man. While many feminists have left the earth and are not in the nonsense strati stratosphere, it’s really simple to not rape people of either sex, if they say “no” then don’t have sex with them; and then dont be mad about. Just leave and have sex with someone else.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/21 02:50 PM
9

So the guy isn’t a great conversationalist. Ok, that’s happens. You can work on that though. You can’t fix stupid or destitute poor or is a felon. So, you either date that guy for his secure lifestyle or focus on “feeling” attracted and just deal with that your attracted to.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/11/21 03:57 PM
1

Again, I just don’t know how to explain this. No one is making up imaginary versions of vindictive women. Women are 100% out there just deciding to divorce their husbands because “they don’t love them anymore and want to find a new husband to marry and have sex with”. This happens. The issue is that WOMEN who do this take ALL you money and your house and your kids and leave you financial destroyed. That’s a problem. If a man, were to want to leave his wife and find a new wife. Then ENTIRE point …
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 11:09 PM
1

I’ll summarize my thoughts on this entire conversation. You seem deadset on your pre-decided idea that men and women somehow have the same fertility clock and just can’t admit that they have entirely different scales of time of fertility. You just won’t admit Scientifically established fact that they have differ fertility windows. That you’ve given up on trying to prove that men can have children well into their 70’s biologically and just started arguing that nonsense about how “it’s not as good…
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 11:02 PM
1

I don’t know if you know this but LOTS of people like attractive women, especially the very attractive ones. So, as a side effect of that attractive women have “a lot of power”. They use that power to make money on onlyfans to charge money to experience their attractiveness while they are naked, which is worth money to people. So, women need to recognize the power they have and as such need to take responsibility for their actions, and/or use their power for good like raising money for charities…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 10:52 PM
0

Didn’t they listen to Uncle Ben from Spider-Man? “With great power comes great responsibility.”
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 07:12 PM
10

You don’t CHOOSE any of those things in exchange for MONEY, you just are those things. Turns out her family didn’t like her CHOICES. It’s a free country and you can choose who you associate with.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 07:11 PM
2

Thank you
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/21 03:05 PM
1

Part 2 They lose 50% of their income, experience a 23% higher mortality rate, only 44% receive the full amount of their child support, and 30% live below the poverty line after initiating a divorce. Literally irrelevant to my entire conversation here. “Until the courts creates the rule that if a woman (or a man) initiates a divorce for no reason, she gets to leave, but she doesn’t get to half his money, she doesn’t get the house and she doesn’t get the kids. She gets to leave. She’s free to leav…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 03:25 AM
1

Part 1 Most of what your argument consists of are a bunch of anecdotal experiences that you claim to be genuine, but haven’t provided any statistical data to validate your stance. Nor do I plan to because, who keeps statistics on “women who got divorced because they wanted to “find themselves and bang dudes”. I’ve talked to divorced men and they described that is what happened. I believe them. Just random dudes living a nice relaxing boring safe suburban life with their family but their wife dec…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 03:25 AM
2

I have absolutely no idea what youre talking about.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 02:19 AM
1

I’m just confused on what you’re arguing here. Like genuinely. What is it? Some where way up in the comments, I made the point that women and men have different biological clocks and SOMEONE was like “nah ah, MEN have sperm that start degrading after their 45”, and I was “and?, we all know that so what?, the point is WOMEN on the other hand begin become less fertile as early as 30 and literally end their fertility around 50 etc” and the person responsed “nah ah women and men are totally basicall…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 02:18 AM
6

There you go.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/21 07:39 PM
19

are you confused? She’s supporting the position this sub supports. She doesn’t need to be “sorted out” she’s CORRECT.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 07:30 PM
9

You’ve failed to understand the single point of this entire dynamic. Men become more successful in their 30’s and still look basically great. Women in their 20’s WANT to date successful attractive men in their 30’s. Men in there 20’s don’t want to date successful older women in their 30’s. But women in there 30’s don’t find men in their 30’s “willing to date them in their 30’s” or men in their 40’s, as “hot and sexy and tingly” as fit men in their 20’s. Women age themselves into a impossible to …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/21 07:22 PM
17

No what she’s expecting is that feeling you get when you, a man, see a very hot attractive woman (for most guys women way out of their league), and you feel “happy” and just enjoy looking at them instantly as they walk by and your brain is like “damn you are hot, i would totally have sex with you.” That’s the same feeling women are looking from every man they date. Except they only have that feeling from the top 10% of men (and of that 10% many of them are in their 20’s). So, when women are in t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/21 07:18 PM
3

What inequality? ALL People are legally free to get married and divorce anyone they want. What part of that is inequality to you?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/21 07:09 PM
6

What a weirdo. Here’s a downvote.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/21 07:07 PM
1

You FINALLY got it. Yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying. Men know MORE about DATING women that women do. Why? Because women don’t DATE women, they are women. Women know more about DATING men, because they date men. I have asked women this exact question: “You’re a woman, have you ever hung out with other women and discussed the complexities of trying to get women to date you”. And they 100% of the time have answered “no, why would I discuss that, I don’t date women”. So, how in the world would w…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 06:37 PM
1

“I’m not like others girls”. Yup, you’d fit right in.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 06:31 PM
1

Men and women do not have the exact same biological timeclock, correct. Great! Perfect, you finally agreed to what I’ve been saying this entire time and are finally correct for having stated that fact correctly. Successful discussion. Have a good day. Edit: Just to be clear you are constantly conflating the concept of the amount of people trying to do something and their ability to do to. When I say men in their 50’s are busting out kids left and right. And you counter that with “well like only …
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 06:16 PM
1

Women don’t initiate divorce for “no reason”. Yes they do. And by no reason, I mean no valid reason to End a marriage, destroy a family, and ruin the finances of a husband. Women (and men but especially women) don’t seem to understand how marriage works or what it is. So what happens is women willing get married. They CHOOSE to get married. They CHOOSE their husband. They CHOOSE to have children. Those are all legal approved choices women make today. So, when 15 years into a marriage, they get b…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 06:13 PM
1

The fuck? Look that shit up for yourself. If youre literally any age other than 4, you’re telling me, you don’t KNOW that it’s generally common knowledge that 23 year old men don’t marry and impregnate 55 year old women? You don’t know that isn’t a thing? You didn’t take high school biology where they explain WHY that isn’t a thing? Wanting me to explain common knowledge to you, not only makes you wrong, but also stupid for not knowing it already. Go to a local high school and have the biology t…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 05:45 PM
1

A place full of people like you.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 05:00 AM
1

Are you seriously this stupid? It APPLIES TO MEN too. Wow you literally are this stupid. Because I even specific that in my previous comments. Men ARE the product to women. Women ARE the product to men. If women are being “controlled” by my metaphors, then MEN are literally being controlled just as much, which makes this entire commentary your on about even more stupid. Men shower and dress well before a date, guess what WOMEN shower and dress well for a date. They BOTH they to present a good cl…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 05:00 AM
1

Hey everyone it’s a reader from Female Dating Strategies. You go do your own thing, WGTOW it up girl.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 04:48 AM
1

No ONE is comparing humans to objects you numbskull. I’m comparing how humans SELL THEMSELVES, to how a car salesperson sells a car. The SELLING is the comparison, you fucking moron. You ever heard of Tinder? You realize your profile on there is a ADVERTISEMENT to sell “the idea of dating you” to the opposite sex. Take good photos that highlight how attractive you are, put in good descriptions, have good features, like a good location, job, age, etc, make it funny, entertaining, seem like a cool…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 04:45 AM
4

Good luck with that. You go girl. Slay queen. “If you can’t handle me at my worst you can’t handle me at my best”. How about men don’t want to deal with you at all. “Oh no, I’m a forty year old woman and no one wants to date me, what do I do?? Yup, have fun with that.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 04:40 AM
1

Bro, get a life. No like seriously get a life, so you can understand the context of how using metaphors applies to real life situations. When men reach an age that they consider dating and marrying women, they are a consumer in a market of women. Women will then attempt to sell men on who they are in order to get dated/married. Women are the consumers in the market of men, when they want to date/marry men. So, unless someone is as stupid as you, they understand the metaphor. Car salesman are kno…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 04:28 AM
2

I’ll address a few points here, since you seem to be misrepresenting a few. Ok You’re conflating the initiation of a divorce for the cause of a divorce. NO, I’m referring ONLY to divorces initiated by the wife FOR NO REASON, or “no good reason”. Did I need to specify that, sure, did I feel like I needed to in this context, no, I thought it was obvious, and you were smart enough to get that. I have no issue for a wife divorce no her husband for beating her. If a woman initiates a divorce based on…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 01:21 AM
1

No We don’t do that here.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:51 AM
1

I have the need to make a point that’s correct and it amuses me that people are very insistent on being wrong. Instead of just agreeing that they were wrong, they forge ahead and repeatedly reply with wrong information or miss the context of the situation. So, if I’m bored, I’ll reply again. Until other they acknowledge their wrong, I realize I’m wrong and learn something, or they stop replying. Which leads to it seemingly like “I need to have the last word” If their last word was “oh my bad, yo…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:50 AM
1

On your left.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:47 AM
2

If you want to engage in a rational discussion, please get rid of the obnoxious petty remarks spaced between each comment. You’re on Reddit, get used to it. It’s not providing your argument with much merit. No, my facts are, the rest is just entertaining. The point I’m trying to make is that men and women have the same biological timeclock. No they don’t. That’s the whole point. They are not “the same”. 50/60/70 year old men often have children with their second wives. It’s a thing, it happens A…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:47 AM
1

The “slant” was making the comment in the first place in the context of the conversation.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:29 AM
1

Take it up with a professor of fertility at a local university. I can’t argue facts at you over and over while you believe whatever you want it believe. A 21 year old man can ejaculate into a 60 year old woman, and has a TINY minuscule possibility of having a baby let alone a healthy baby. (With the repeated goal of fucking until they get pregnant) A 60 year old man can ejaculate into a 21 year old woman, and has a moderately good chance of actually having a baby and a moderately ok but possible…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:27 AM
2

Congrats at beating the odds. You are a personal anecdote of success and not the average statistical result of those circumstances. You encouraging many other people to have children with that advanced age is like a successful movie star telling people to drop everything and move to Hollywood and you too can succeed starting with nothing, because they did, So Can You. No they were lucky. You were lucky. Enjoy it, but don’t mislead other people.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:15 AM
2

YOUR wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:12 AM
1

I literally specified this earlier but I’ll repeat it. The PROBLEM isn’t that a hot Chad that bangs women left and right accidentally settled down with a slutty woman like himself he knocked up and then later on cheats on her because he’s a Chad and women are always throwing themselves at her, and she probably cheated too, or randomly decided she finally landed a hot guy and baby trapped him and now can lock him down and make him be monogamous with her. No, that’s isn’t the issue. The issue is t…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:11 AM
2

Hey asshole, Men’s fertility decreases as they age. I’ve been literally saying this the whole time. My very clear point is while it DECREASES, it doesn’t decrease to ZERO, like it doesn’t with the vast majority of women. The idea that robust fertility for a man will continue well past a woman’s decline in fertility is untrue. Idiot, the vast majority women CANT have children in their late 60’s/70’s, literally CANT. Men CAN, it’s is decreased, yes, can there be issues, yes. Is it POSSIBLE YES. Th…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:03 AM
0

So you MET get at 37 and had multiple children? You either had kids like the second you met her or you had some iffy kids with her at 40. If they turned out fine, good for you, you beat the odds.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 11:52 PM
1

No, your wrong. You entire argument was blah blah blah, women can like have children whenever, I won’t even really acknowledge it, but have your hear that men over 45 have some small statiscal chance of having retarded kids, like it’s been 100% proven, see this study, old men at age 45 aren’t reproductively viable. That’s not accurate at all. After age 30, all womens reproductive viability starts dropping, because it isn’t just about the egg quality, it’s about whether they can actually make it …
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 11:41 PM
2

Bro, you’re wrong just accept it. Just let it in, just let it happen, you can take it. Stop fighting it.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 10:56 PM
2

Eww, that’s pretty gay.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 10:54 PM
2

Just acknowledge these are two different factual scenarios: (….and we don’t have to get bogged down in irrelevant information or scenarios that’s you’ve apparently decided to interject into this discussion.) 1) Womens best reproductive years are between 18 and 35 (plus or minus 45) and after that are essentially non-reproductive excluding rare circumstances. 2) Mens best reproductive years are between 18 and 45, with extended capability “with issues” till 70+, that increase with each year of agi…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 10:45 PM
0

Bitch, get out of here, with that late ass “pulling a fact out of nowhere bullshit”. I beat you to that like 6 comments ago. Literally word for word from my earlier comment: However men who are 70 have children all the time that are fine. (When they try to have children) Women who are 70 DONT have children at all. (Except in some exceedingly rare circumstances) I KNEW you’d try to pull that card, so I already called it out.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 10:07 PM
1

But if I, who AM a WOMAN, cannot speak for all women, the how can you, a MAN with clearly deep seated bias, speak for all women? You are the one Selling the car. I am the one Buying the car. I don’t listen to the salesman on the car lot, they have a biased interest in selling the car. I go do my own research before I buy the car. Like I said, statistics speaks for “all women” and “all men”. You are just one person. And I am not speaking for “all women”, I am speaking from the research and statis…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 09:53 PM
1

We are taking about women at the age of 37. That is the context of this discussion. Good you got something right so far. No one is arguing that menopause doesn't exist. Well you did, you said men have issues with fertility after age 45 (which isn’t 35 by the way) and after I said men in their 70’s have children. (Which was an obvious point to contrast that women DONT due to menopause) You argued that men DONT have kids in their 70’s due to the prevalence of erectile distinction, which pre-viagra…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 09:28 PM
1

Telling the truth is easy, you just keep repeating the facts. The rest takes care of it’s self.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 09:12 PM
1

I’m a go ahead and solve this mystery for you. YOU are not “all women”. You are your own individual person. If you do you and somehow meet a man and get married and have kids and be monogamous and never desire at some point, years into your marriage, to get divorced because your husband bores you physically and sexually and start to desire to fuck random hot guys you see around that make you feel tingles. And stay married and have hot passionate sex with your husband a lot. And the both of you n…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 09:10 PM
2

Where do you think you are getting all you “facts”. You sound like a high school student who just read a book on some “information” about humans. No, prior to viagra, men well into their 70’s WERE able to have erections. Especially healthy men. The problem with men “today” is they are all out of shape and fat and have horrible blood pressure and heart issues. Fit men just get old and their dick keeps working along with their sperm. Women regardless of fitness GO THROUGH MENOPAUSE. That’s literal…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 09:01 PM
1

The fuck is all that bullshit? …No One said people were getting married to HAVE SEX. The point is if you get married you now have tons of sex with a person who literally sleeps next to you and doesn’t have any disease since your both the only people having sex with each other. I already told you the answer. Men want to fuck women. Men get married to women to fuck them a lot, forever. (And start a family, and enjoy having a person to spend time with etc etc) If a woman didn’t fuck a lot of men an…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 08:30 PM
5

Nope, go fuck yourself. You know Google exists, type that shit in yourself. I’m not arguing that it’s OBVIOUS if your an older gentleman, the POSSIBiLTY of your sperm being not as potent and high quality as it was when you are 20, isn’t true. It is. However men who are 70 have children all the time that are fine. (When they try to have children) Women who are 70 DONT have children at all. (Except in some exceedingly rare circumstances) Women and mens sexual organs work entirely differently. Like…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 08:16 PM
1

Yes, I’m realistic in that They are hypocritical. A man might want a woman with huge tits and a nice ass and a tiny waist and amazing face and beautiful hair and a good personality. That’s NOT hypocritical, it’s just incredibly rare and hence unrealistic for the vast majority of men. WOMEN on the other hand, demand a literally impossible man that cannot exist at the same time. Leading to the joke that a woman wants what’s described as three characterizations of a guy and the secret to a happy ma…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 08:13 PM
4

Yes, we have tons of evidence it’s an issue. We’ve compiled all the data here online amongst men who have dealt with women with very high partner counts. The simple issue is women with very high partner counts don’t make good monogamous marriage partners. For whatever reasons women don’t work well in monogamous marriages with families, after having very high partner counts. They initiate the vast majority of divorces, cause issues, cheat, demand non-monogamy, and lots of other issues. Where wome…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 08:07 PM
4

Well I’ll go ahead and disagree with you since, literally ALL of science points to massive increases in the need for fertility treatments in older women trying to have children. So … it is.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 07:57 PM
3

Accurate
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 07:36 PM
5

What? Your missing the whole point. Everything he’s saying women want is hypocritical. As in impossible. You cant be what he’s saying women want. Build a bears, are all possible to make since you just pick and choose parts and put it together. There’s nothing hypocritical about it. Now if you said women want to be able to customize an impossible American Girl doll AND a build a bear at the same time, in one doll/bear. You’d have captured how women create the demands/standards they have for the “…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 07:36 PM
2

How old were you? 37 is past the prime for having a family, was that not the goal of marrying her?
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 06:28 PM
-14

Eww
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 06:27 PM
3

Really? You think men in the 21st century, worry about “having that first time” with a woman? Who are all these men fucking then when they go hit the clubs/bars to “bang a chick”? The same 3 women? NO ONE is going around acting celibate these days. But as the person before you mentioned, there’s a difference between 10 guys over 10 years and 100 guys. It’s about displaying you have the ability to have discretion.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 06:27 PM
9

No..ever since Ellen Chao took over it’s went to shit. Then spez took over and it continued.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/21 06:09 PM
5

Have you only seen ever gone on Reddit on a smartphone? Try it on actual computer, it will blow your mind, the difference.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/11/21 03:59 PM
1

Exactly…
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 05:34 PM
3

You didn’t used to see that in PUA circles. You used to see an analysis of how women reacted to things and what they reacted to. It just so happened that women reacted a lot to bad boys and emotionally unavailable men, as an example. So people said, go do that, and women will like you more. Then women like you more. The “dislike” of women in those circles was the dislike that it turned out that lots of women did in fact operate like that mentally/emotionally essentially illogically. Which as a l…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 05:13 PM
7

women are the only parent a child actually needs…. …to kill them.
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 02:10 AM
3

Who got this woman pregnant, come on guys, raise your standards????
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/10/21 04:41 PM
1

If someone says “trans people are real people and not mentally ill degenerates”. I can’t easily judge that. It’s pretty straight forward and unless your a doctor you can’t define what’s mentally ill and what’s not. If someone says “transwomen are 100% women regardless if they still have a penis or not and lesbians who like “women” 100% have to sick their dick if they happen to go on a date and get sexual, OR ELSE that lesbian is transphobic. I’ll judge the shit out of you for being a unreasonabl…
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/21 04:31 PM
0

I do when people make it very easy to judge them. Don’t express things and say things that are so easy judged and it’s much harder to criticize them. Think harder before you talk and people have less to criticize.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/21 03:28 AM
1

(Not all) LESBIANS DO NOT GET ALL DOLLED UP FOR DATES. Obviously, getting all dolled up for dates by women, is for men, if the second men are out of the equation they suddenly drop the act….
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/21 11:46 PM
2

What a bad excuse for a human.
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/21 10:58 PM
-1

You’re missing the point, you DONT deserve respect in regards to anything. If I see a fat disgusting person walking down the street, then I’ll tell them. They can ask me nicely not to, and be offended by my words, but I can still see them and be offended by what they look like. I can ask them nicely to not show themselves in public where I can see them, and how much do you want to they are going to refuse. So, I refuse to not say things about them. Toughen up and don’t let words get to you. Don’…
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/21 10:58 PM
1

I think you have that backwards…
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 02:38 PM
1

Accurate
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 04:19 PM
1

Your talking to ME. I said anything happening in India is irrelevant to me because it’s a backwards country, so I don’t care what happens there. I thought your original comments were about feminism in America. Then you clarified they were about India, and I lost all interest.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 10:24 PM
-8

Hail satan
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 07:01 PM
1

The why are you talking to me about it.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 01:50 AM
1

Ahh, it’s a huge chunk of India. That’s the whole issue with India. It has like a billion people. An while a chunk of the country has modernized that only effects a portion of the population. A huge portion of the population is still living outdated lives. But go ahead and pull up footage from a train leaving a station from last week in India and show me that there aren’t people having off the side of the train. In America we ride INSIDE the trains.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 06:18 PM
1

Wow, that’s racist. No, you’re massive off, on what is considered levels of fucked up. The things you mentioned barely even registered on a “your society is fucked up scale” compared to the issues that India currently has. Again, people in INDIA, literally don’t have indoor plumbing toilets and are actively dumping dead bodies in rivers in India today. America solved those issues like almost 150 years ago. Gotta catch up man.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 06:13 PM
1

You’re not in 2021thats the whole point, India is still stuck in the 1850’s.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 06:11 PM
1

No, you’re massive off, on what is considered levels of fucked up. The things you mentioned barely even registered on a “your society is fucked up scale” compared to the issues that India currently has. Again, people literally don’t have indoor plumbing toilets and are activity dumping dead bodies in rivers in India today. America solved those issues like almost 150 years ago. Gotta catch up man.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 06:05 PM
1

1) Our constitution allows us to have terrorist attacks on our governemnt by us the citizens if we think the government isn’t doing what it’s supposed to. The problem with the latest one, was “the news” lied to several million people and “tricked them into thinking the governemnt was corrupted”. The “news sources” were wrong and I personally think those news sources should be persecuted for tricking those people. 2) Who cares if people are killed in schools every week, it’s like a rounding error…
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 05:55 PM
6

You can’t time travel, and you can’t revoke past consent already given post activity. That would make contract law, literally unenforceable.
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/21 10:04 PM
3

Yeah, you should double check that, because it’s already happened. It’s ALREADY happened. And women have lost court cases over the accusations, when there is proof it wasn’t rape.
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/21 10:03 PM
1

And you STILL have a lack of indoor plumbing and throw dead bodies in rivers and ride on the outside of trains. So, work on that first, then try to be the 4th largest economy.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/21 07:05 PM
1

Oh I don’t care what people are doing in India, that’s some backwards third world country. I’m taking about women and jobs in America, where things actually matter. When India learns what a toilet is, and to stop throwing dead bodies in rivers, and that you ride INSIDE trains, then maybe I’ll start caring what happens in India.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/21 06:20 PM
1

I didn’t say make companies hire more women. I said more women should be working hard to train and get hired for these jobs. Work and become better than the men currently being hired for those jobs, so they get hired instead.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/21 06:15 PM
1

Women are hardly on the front lines, there are barely any female sewage workers, and ALL the jobs I just mentioned require muscle not just oil rigs…that was the whole point. Hard jobs, that require muscle and strength, and are dirty and dangerous. Being VP of Marketing is easy, safe, and clean, and pays well. Of course women want to break the glass ceiling and get that job.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/21 06:14 PM
7

They act like it’s a big deal, because it’s THEIR job. Men get obsessed with lawn quality because it’s THEIR job. It can’t be more obvious whose job is whose than who cares more about it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/09/21 02:02 PM
4

I want to 100% male child nursery workers. That industry needs to be massively more inclusive. Oh wait, SJWs are considered about all the males raping the kids and only let women work in that industry? So, sexist. /s
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/21 04:43 PM
2

Lots of simp men use it too, so you can’t even tell if it’s just women using “incel” anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/21 04:41 PM
3

Guess this isn’t about being an incel. People who point out issues with “feminism” get laid alot, since they understand inter-gender-relations better than most. So they aren’t incels. But have fun being an SJW.
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/21 04:40 PM
6

Simp
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/21 04:39 PM
4

Now get them working on oil rigs and underwater welding and front line soldiers and we’ll have finally made some progress
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/21 04:39 PM
3

Becuase they RUIN jobs with their bullshit. I’m not dealing with HR complaints if I’m underground digging in the heat all day, if I want to make a crude joke, I’m making a fucking crude joke. If women want to work in those jobs, they need to NOT be easily offended. But feminists literally act like that is the worst offense possible. So women get sidelined for those jobs, plus the whole issue with them not being able to lift heavy objects.
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 10:16 PM
3

The poster LITERALLy said we are talking about feminist claims in the UNITED STATES. Just starting off your comment arguing about femicides just completely made anything that follows irrelevant since you clearly aren’t talking about the US. The US doesn’t have some massive issue with femicide. No one here cares what is happening in some backwater nonsense country. We’re talking about the US, ie first world countries.
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 10:12 PM
1

So stop arguing for “feminism” and constantly changing the goal posts and just argue for gender equality, or just “equality”. I can make a list of a million reasons why men suffer at the hands of society too, it isn’t some wierd lopsided situation where women constantly have a million problematic issues caused by society and men just wander through life without a care in the world. You’re thinking of affluent white women that drink Starbucks and gentrify neighborhoods in New York City. Real men …
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/21 10:42 PM
1

The point is “places falling behind” on really generic feminism (ie working towards reducing obvious sexism towards females) aren’t a reason for “more and more extreme feminism” in places where generic feminism has already established fairly good equality, like large left leaning cities and states. Because Tennessee and Kentucky (and other countries) still need some help getting across the concept of “female body autonomy” and “women don’t have to be stay at home moms because the Bible says so” …
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/21 08:01 PM
5

Wow exactly like I said in my comment. Where are the real feminists? Get some oil rig jobs ladies.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 10:55 PM
5

No they haven’t and you’re full of shit. It’s a video show a job that women OBVIOUSLY don’t want becuase it’s dirty and it’s dangerous and it require hard physical labor. But please go ahead and share the states of how many women are rushing to get work in oil fields and oil rigs in the middle of the ocean, or the exciting career in underwater welding, or literally any other “hard” job. The percent of women that work in HR today is like 110%. Men have trouble even getting into that field. You si…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 09:27 PM
6

Are you retarded? It LITERALLY encompasses the entire conversation of actual feminism vs what “angry feminists” want people to think feminism is. Feminism means women want that job, they want equal pay to do that job. Real Feminist Women don’t just get All the office jobs and men get manual labor jobs, they get hard working manual labor jobs also. Real feminists understand that hard, risky jobs pay more than easy safe jobs that women get. Hence the pay gap. When we see a woman like Gina Carano i…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 09:05 PM
2

Reproductive laws are problematic in “red” states otherwise everyone else has already moved past this. This however is a religious issue and not a feminism issue. Seriously ask any random atheist if they care about abortion, they answer 99% of the time is “don’t care”. There are no workplace issues today that would need to be solved with feminism. Simply put gay men in the workplace with power and status can sexually harass men just as much as a straight man with power and status can sexually ha…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 03:23 PM
1

But it’s not an issue. That’s point. It’s no longer an issue that isn’t being dealt with. Women have the same rights as men currently and anyone that doesn’t follow through on that will get sued and the problem fixed. My example of this, is the US female soccer team, that literally tries to sue for sexist pay discrimination and were literally told by the judge that they were wrong because they literally made more money than the men’s team overall and they apparently forgot they AGREED to the con…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 02:10 PM
1

But is it? And is that relevant to the fact that we KNOW it exists and it’s mostly just waiting for old people to die off? Like what millennial/gen z person alive in America doesn’t grasp the concept of equal pay or equality or other obvious feminist goals?
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 01:49 PM
4

Someone somewhere had a point that women should have the right to vote and the right to get any job a man can for equal pay for equal skill and be allowed to have abortions etc. Whatever that is, if it was called feminism or not, was an actual point like 50 years ago. The people STILL going on and on about feminism today, just hate men or somehow don’t get how much equality they actually have. Like that purple haired soccer lady that sued for gender pay discrimination against her soccer league c…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 01:45 AM
17

The bigger question is how do YOU not understand why? It’s OBVIOUS the bias this woman had in the video that she felt the entitlement to hit that guy and not FEAR any sort of physical retaliation IE SELF DEFENSE. She felt perfectly safe to be the aggressor. Why men don’t just randomly punch each other in the face ALL the time is because then they person who does the first punch has a HIGH likely hood of getting punched back by another man, because most punches don’t knock people out, it just mak…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 07:10 PM
9

Please whine harder
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 07:04 PM
1

False
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 09:18 PM
1

I never said they were good looking, I said they were muscular. I don’t understand what world you think was happening the 1800’s but it isn’t the world your describing unless you think it’s rural Russia or something. My family has been in America a long time and were specifically farmers up until recently and our family photos are just a long line of attractive muscular men and fit women going way back. No brad Pitt faces, but good fit bodies from farming all day. My grandpa (a farmer) could bre…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/21 02:02 AM
2

Correct women don’t have to prove themselves the way men do, because men just treated them as they treated the children. Hence women and children first, etc. THEN women fought for rights as society became more safe, as in safe from external threats like marauders, tigers, and other countries invading, meaning the women didn’t need the men to protect. Meaning women didn’t need to subjugate themselves to men for protection. This allowed women to see themselves as equals in those safe societies, an…
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/21 01:58 AM
4

…but that was my whole point about the word incel. It ISNT exclusively used for anything. I literally just explained it’s used as a modern replacement word for like 6 other words. Neither is asshole. It’s used in a variety of ways. It depends on the sentence, the context. I mean… If you reaaally want the word then it’s “bad boy”. Which is obvious the exact opposite of “nice guy”. Women like “bad boys” , it’s been used in songs, movies, phrases, and doesn’t really have any other meaning uses. It’…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/21 01:44 AM
1

So were men jacked or not? Did they have abs, shoulders, arms? I’m not talking body builders. Just not being skinny, fat, slouchy men from working all day.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/21 01:37 AM
0

…that doesn’t have any relevance to my comment. I didn’t say anything about the 80% of women, men don’t want to date either because they are also fat and ugly. Just that women seem to like a type of man, and I questioned whether that was ever the average man and I presume it was at some point. So, both fat men and fat women are both complaining about why people don’t look like they did back in the 1800’s when you had to carry heavy pails of water into the house from the well all day.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/21 01:36 AM
22

Well first of nice guys came up with their own word, they kept calling themselves nice guys and then getting mad when they were nice to women and then women didn’t sleep with them in return. Women simply took that name and ran with it, and made it a bad name. Same with incel. Involuntary celibate men, names themsleves that in regards to how they themsleves were unwillingly celibate because no women would ever sleep with them, while it’s obvious that even the ugliest women could get men to sleep …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/21 01:07 AM
0

Basic 80% of guys are not on the menu. I get that not all guys can be 6 feet tall, but do 80% of men go to the gym? I’m not saying anyone has to go to the gym, but what’s with this modern giant drop of women finding average men not-attractive. I always wonder what people looked like back in the 1800’s. Like men working all day in the field in the farm, or making stuff with hand tools in a factory, or brick laying with no large construction equipment, average everyday men must have been jacked ba…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/21 12:53 AM
37

No there is a word. Assholes As in “Women like assholes.”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/21 12:48 AM
3

I just write in a name of a charity and make it luxury level then show my wife, to let her know that if she kills me she gets nothing. But if I get injured or slowly die of cancer, I’ll change it back to her because I care.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/21 04:22 AM
5

Those sneaky murderous widows, gotta keep an eye out for them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/21 03:17 AM
3

Men should want a woman who can cook breakfast from scratch, go milk the cows, tend to the potatoes, take care little billy and sally, ALL while being pregnant. While the man is busy working on building a barn and then plowing a second field. Now THATS division of labor in a relationship.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/21 02:45 AM
6

Only excuse or reason in my book, is if she is a Widow and her husband, a good man, died in a tragic industrial accident. And she’s now left without a husband, but was a great traditional wife, and would continue to be one, but has two kids, but now also a house, life insurance settlements, savings etc. So she isn’t necessarily coming to the table empty handed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/21 02:40 AM
2

Nah, she said “she would take care of him” and anyone know what that means. But then she even confirmed it mean sex, when he replied double checking and she didn’t like his answer and got made, and didn’t direct him saying she was meant she was going to cook and clean and manager the household and the kids and him.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/21 02:38 AM
2

She’s not wrong but not even for the kids, the kids are a whole other problem, but her answer of “take care of you.” If a man is being his house, job, and cars to the relationship, Her answer better have been “I’ll take care your house, your cars, YOUR kids, and you.” But she didn’t. So bad answer.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/21 02:36 AM
2

But how are YOU a feminist if you are against sex-work being an option for women? You CANT be a feminist if you are against the OPTION of women to do sex-work. It’s their body. They can use it how they want, they can have abortion, do sex-work, be on only-fans, walk around topless, whatever they want. Being against any of that is attempting to repress women and clearly non-pro feminist, and I don’t even mean modern fourth wave feminism nonsense, I mean actual relevant first wave feminism. The on…
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/21 06:46 PM
3

How are you a feminist if you aren’t pro-sex work being an option for women?
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/21 04:31 PM
12

When I read that, I immediately thought, “ohh she’s saying the quiet part out loud”
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/21 04:24 PM
1

As do republicans and libertarians and centrists. No major political party has any logical sense to their established political views, many times they are just straight up hypocritically conflicting.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/21 02:20 PM
3

This is who is building our trucks? No wonder Ford and Chevy trucks fall apart. 420 everyday, even work days? So many questions…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/08/21 03:12 AM
22

Make me a sandwich.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/21 12:14 AM
1

Wow what a racist sexist manager.
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/21 11:47 PM
4

Literally a liability
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/21 11:45 PM
2

No it’s about power.
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/21 11:44 PM
6

There was, it was called ignoring them and not taking them seriously. Because it was known that “some” women would go around LYING, many women are sneaky and manipulative. This is very established historically. Look at how many women murdered kill, they don’t confront and shoot or fight or stab, they poison their victims very sneaky. However that punishment was on women actually getting sexually harrased by bad men instead which wasn’t good, simply to prevent bad women from just going around acc…
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/21 11:40 PM
1

No that’s wrong. Social issues and economic issues are entirely separate issues and people can have compeletly distinct opinions in both the are the established Republican or Democrat political views.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/21 10:41 PM
-3

No, that’s wrong. All those people simply have opinions that disagree with ESTABLISHED Republican values but are still willing to be republicans for other reasons. Being pro-gay and Republican are entirely contradictory political opinions. It’s like being progun and being Democratic, they are entirely contradictory political opinions.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/21 10:39 PM
2

What do you think it shows? That only 3 people in the whole world have 7 inch dicks? 1 guy with a 7 inch dick can fuck 365+ girls in a year. Even at an 80th percentile rarity, there are many 100,000’s or more 7 inch dicks. It’s way easier to find and fuck a 7 inch dick that it is to fuck a celebrity Brad Pitt or Lebron James for the average woman. Who do you think Chad or Tyrone is based off, Brad Pitt or a random guy in town with a 7 inch dick?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/21 12:01 AM
2

Always wear a condom.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/21 12:01 AM
2

What do you think it shows? That only 3 people in the whole world have 7 inch dicks? 1 guy with a 7 inch dick can fuck 365+ girls in a year. Even at an 80th percentile rarity, there are many 100,000’s or more 7 inch dicks. It’s way easier to find and fuck a 7 inch dick that it is to fuck a celebrity Brad Pitt or Lebron James for the average woman. Who do you think Chad or Tyrone is based off, Brad Pitt or a random guy in town with a 7 inch dick?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/21 12:01 AM
1

What do you think it shows? That only 3 people in the whole world have 7 inch dicks? 1 guy with a 7 inch dick can fuck 365+ girls in a year. Even at an 80th percentile rarity, there are many 100,000’s or more 7 inch dicks. It’s way easier to find and fuck a 7 inch dick that it is to fuck a celebrity Brad Pitt or Lebron James for the average woman. Who do you think Chad or Tyrone is based off, Brad Pitt or a random guy in town with a 7 inch dick?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/21 12:01 AM
3

But, It’s my attitude. The point I’m making is you can build and change various body parts I mentioned. She was talking about dicks. You cannot grow a dick bigger and there are no known effective plastic surgeries for bigger dicks as well established as breast implants. So it’s not an improvable or changeable body part. Hence it’s not the same.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/21 01:05 PM
6

I agree and disagree with you on your comments my original point. My main point was in response to your comment (albeit short and you expanded on it in your second comment) was that vaginas are effected by large dicks being inserted into them. My main point being that they aren’t. As in the myth that vaginas get worn out over time from being fucked a lot, or from fucking a few big dicks, they magically become hallways. I exemplified that in how you can fist a vagina with your own hand and then f…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/21 10:11 PM
17

I think your misunderstanding how physics works. When you read the sentence, “it’s feels sore after and needs prep work”. That means that the vagina needed to “stretch” to fit the big dick, then it shrinks back to its smaller size. Yes, do some vaginas get slightly looser over time yes, are some bigger than others yes. But you can fit your whole hand in one, if you want, whenever you want, and they will then shrink back and your dick (any average and up size dick) will fit just fine. The woman i…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/21 05:57 PM
4

What? That’s exactly what I tell women and girlfriends I’m dating. “Your ass is to small go to gym and do squats, eat a little more you getting way too skinny and your tits shrunk, you have an A cup get breast implants and you can jump right to a D cup.” I go to the gym and work out to get the body I (and they) want, why wouldn’t I tell them the body I want them to have? And if they’re offended, dumped. That frees me up to find a woman who already has a nice ass or big tits AND a great personali…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/21 05:48 PM
18

Big dicks aren’t insanely rare. There’s a bell curve to penis size. Many many many 6 inch penises, but there are many many larger 7 inch penises, many 8 inch ones and then few 9 inch and then the rare 10 inch+ A big dick to many women is a girthy 7 inch penis, big dicks don’t start at the rare 10 inch, that’s a very very big dick. When the average is 5.5 inches.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/21 05:44 PM
6

No, specifically 3rd wave feminism. They had a point with first wave feminism. But Then they achieved it. Instead of feminists stopping after first wave, they liked the attention and they just kept coming up with more “issues”, and now it’s just about becoming more entitled, the victim, and gaining more power while not taking on anymore responsibility with in society.
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/21 02:49 AM
1

You are very close to getting it and very far away at the same time. You’re example of “all men are rapists” is a perfect counter example. As I said, it’s about managing expectations, which “all men are rapists” ALSO accomplishes. A simple concept of “the red pill” or mgtow or any of those movements is a concept that women like men that workout, with muscles etc. It’s repeated over and over again, along with all the other commentary. Which is if your a man, you need to be hitting the gym. Don’t …
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/21 08:36 PM
5

No they exist. If you don’t realize and understand they exist, then that’s on you. Online dating apps has entirely shifted people’s expectations to be whatever they want, making people think dating is like ordering things on Amazon and getting 2 day delivery. That’s not how dating works, and those people need to manage their expectations. Hence, Normal average women having very high expectations for men, and then not being able to find “good men”. That’s like trying to find its for sale for the …
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/21 02:37 PM
3

The concept of awalt, was in response as to men always saying “well not my girl” in regards to whatever was happening in that. Relationship, just to find out they got divorced later, or the woman did start dating another guy with more money and dumped him, or did cheat on him with a very attractive guy. It was simply a removed next to those men that all women ARE capable of those things and you “sweet, nice, woman” is capable of that regardless of what you think. It’s not derogatory to women, it…
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/21 02:33 PM
26

This is literally constantly discussed. It’s entirely factored into the discussion of what women actually want versus what they say they want in regards to how men should act and pursue women. Versus the flip side of how many women are acting today and presenting themselves today in attempts to get men to date them. Which reflects the concept of never listen to women giving advice, when asked women give men the opposite advice they need to successfully date women and they give themselves and oth…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/07/21 07:21 PM
1

And do you no longer have low self esteem?
/r/MensRights15/07/21 04:10 PM
9

“Don’t fuck us, unless you genuinely love us” Does she not understand SHE literally is the person controlling wether or not someone fucks her? She approves or disapproves who fucks her. The way she writes that, is as if, guys are popping up and fucking her and she like “what? oh hey” and before she knows it there gone. …that’s called rape. Unless she’s been getting raped for the last 10 years by guys who don’t love her…she chose and approved everyone of the guys she had sex with. Let alone, imag…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/21 02:57 PM
1

It’s not science. There is no such thing as gender. There is only sex, and sex hormones and sexual DNA and chromosomes Gender is either a short hand term form of ones sex. OR it’s not a thing and there’s no such thing as 100 different genders. It’s just one more spectrum of whatever anyone wants regardless of their sex. Trying to pick random points on an infinite spectrum it’s retarded. The only relevant concept scientifically proven is transsexuals which people don’t even recognize the term any…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/21 07:38 PM
1

Man/woman were just layman terms created to simply saying male/female. They aren’t some magically alternate word that has endless definitions and possibilities. The whole gender crap needs to be simplified and just let MEN wear dresses and make up and let WOMEN be masculine and work out and have jobs. There’s no need to be a different gender just because you’re more masculine or feminine. Youre literally trying to create a million little dots on a spectrum between a manly man and a womanly woman…
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/21 01:03 AM
1

That’s not science. Science is that females of a species have uteruses and ovaries and become pregnant, genetically. Males have testicles and generate sperm, genetically. Transwomen are female, transmen are male according to science Man/woman were simply less official terms or more layman’s terms for male and female. There’s no way to create a uterus for a transwomen or testicles or a penis for a transman. We haven’t reached that level of medical science. Until then, science says otherwise to wh…
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/21 12:59 AM
1

No you don’t comment
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/21 12:56 AM
1

There needs to three genders man, woman, misc. Any man can be as feminine as he wants wear skirts make up whatever he wants. He can also be as masculine as he wants and work out and weld and where work boots everywhere. And have a penis and testicles and generate testosterone. Any woman can be as feminine as she wants, wear skirts make up whatever she wants. She can also be as masculine as she wants, and work out, and weld, and where work boots everywhere. And have a uterus and ovaries and gener…
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/21 12:56 AM
1

Ohhh, so brave so strong.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/21 12:49 AM
1

…he literally explains this in the video. It’s called genetic science. Sperm is just the mobility device that takes dna from the male and gets it to the egg to combine with the dna from the female. It isn’t male dna and female dna it’s just dna. So you don’t “need” sperm to fertilize an egg. You just need DNA, or specifically half of a whole DNA to mix with the half of the DNA in the egg. Scientists have been able to get DNA from various cells in the body and alter it to get that “half DNA” nece…
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/21 12:41 AM
1

You either know you got assaulted after or during it happening or you didn’t get assaulted. Now whether you report the assault or not is a totally different story, or how soon you feel comportable reporting it is another thing. This, I “realized” I was assaulted 20 years later bullshit is bullshit. I can understand taking 20 years to report it but you had to have thought about the assault everyday for 20 years and tried to get over it or forget about but can’t.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/21 12:36 AM
1

The fuck does this have to do with feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/21 12:15 AM
1

What? That’s like incredibly incorrect. The entire concept is simply dating, relationships, and marrying women in today’s society isn’t a good idea, it’s not worth it financially, and it’s not worth it socially, and it’s not worth it sexually. You can still know women, be friends with women, have sex with women etc, but being in relationships with women is not only pointless today it’s literally a bad idea and dangerous. Due to how women act and behave and the opinions they have and how society …
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/21 12:10 AM
6

So after women got rights like the right to vote etc, stop bullshitting people and “pretending” you kept the name and changed the meaning. Just stop using the word feminism and use the world equality. But nooo, women keep using feminism, when there’s literally a word that already means equality, which is literally the word equality. Doesn’t sound equal to me, sound a lot like women like their word better.
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/21 07:57 PM
28

If your woman gets eaten by a tiger, then you don’t have a woman anymore. That’s some solid responsibility right there. If your woman doesn’t like having sex, then why are you protecting that woman from tigers when there’s all these other women that want to get protected from tigers that do like having sex. …and now we’re here.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/06/21 04:03 PM
1

Solving the worlds problems one at a time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 05:53 PM
3

I take cats I see wondering around the street and put them in my house and I feed them and see if they try to leave. They do initially. Then they just get used to it because food. And don’t try to find their unconditional love owner. Then I take them to the pound and drop them off for them to deal with them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 02:25 AM
1

You said cat and dogs came back. Then you said you were a good owner. That was the end of story. The implication was that for some reason you happen to not feed your animals and they wondered off but they came back and you continued keeping them as pets. If you didn’t keep feeding after they came back then, ok. That doesn’t really prove much about being “a good owner” or not. Or whether cats/dogs have unconditional love.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 02:14 AM
9

I said stop feeding them. I didn’t say stop feeding them and then they wonder off and then when they come back start feeding them again. I said stop feeding them FOREVER, it was implied. If the cat or dog just decides to live outside your house and then starve to death, then you’ve got yourself a unconditional love animal. If it wonders off and starts living at someone else’s house that is willing to feed them, then that wasn’t unconditional love. That’s an animal that conditionally loves whoeve…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/21 01:41 AM
34

Try not feeding your dog or cat and let them live outside. They will wonder off and not give a shit how long you’ve had them for.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/06/21 08:46 PM
2

And you learned to read, so we all accomplished something.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/06/21 06:57 PM
2

You went on to give more commentary unrelated to that point, in your last comment, and I wanted to get the conversation back on track. Which we’ve now successfully completed, since we’ve both confirmed our understanding that you did in fact misunderstand her initial comment. Excellent work everyone!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/06/21 03:58 PM
2

I’ll just clarify that you referred to something that was never said. Other people pointed it out also. Yes I “misquoted her” because I didn’t feel like copy pasting her quote and just wrote it from memory. The gist of what I wrote was STILL closer to your entire understanding of what she wrote regardless of how you read other parts of what she said. She NEVER said she was “waiting to lose weight”. She literally says she actively dieting or losing weight earlier in her comment.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/06/21 08:57 PM
5

Are you not good at reading? Where did she say she was “waiting” to become thin? She asked “should I WAIT to start dating until I am thin”. Meaning she is actively “thinning” and waiting “on dating”. I’m pretty sure you just skipped a bunch of words reading that sentence. It doesn’t matter though, because most men don’t like dating fat chicks anyway, so who cares.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/06/21 01:59 PM
6

Red flags are red flags, man. If these people you know don’t have an red flags that’s great, good for them. This woman in the post has a whole bunch. She is an example of what to stay away from. The idea of this sub is to show/teach/inform men of what red flags are, who has them, how prevalent they are, how they sometimes are hidden, and how to avoid the red flags and the women that have them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/06/21 12:08 PM
1

It’s all on a sliding scale of a spectrum. Not an on off switch, we’re your sexual or you feel like vomiting by engaging in sex, it just closer and closer to that point as you go down the spectrum. But the key point is some people believe women “want sex from alphas” and don’t have sex with average guys, while there is an entire other sector of women that straight up don’t want to have sex. They might not even be prudes, they just straight up don’t want to have sex, with you, or anyone. No amoun…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/05/21 05:06 AM
1

Oookay. I saw it as informing people. But, I’ll reword it to make it less “telling”. “Hey, men, FYI, asexual women exist and they literally don’t like having sex, as “their sexuality”. IF you are a man who *likes** to have sex with your significant other and would like to have a chance to continue to have sex after marriage, Ask your significant other, if they are asexual BEFORE you become serious with them, or marry them. Then make your own choices.”* The concept of “fridgid” women, and “my wif…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/05/21 11:29 PM
4

IF you are a man who likes to have sex: Do NOT date or marry asexual women. You are wasting your time, it is pointless. They don’t want to have sex with you or anyone ever. Just friendzone them. This is purely informational, make your own choices.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/05/21 09:15 PM
4

Where is her husband and father of her child? Religious people aren’t allowed to have premarital sex. So, CLEARLY he died in an industrial accident and she is now a widow who just wants to find another good man like her husband. Perhaps that local man/father in town, with two kids, whose wife died in a textile factory accident.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/05/21 11:49 PM
385

That is a hard 29.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/21 10:31 PM
2

Any one consider the simple fact that is she and her little family are the priority then she can prioritize paying for it. Like if you match and she’s fun or attractive or something then she already has a house she’s paying for. (Later in the relationship) You move in, she can keep right on along paying for that house, while you save money from your job. Because you aren’t the priority for her. Which means bother she nor her kids are your priority. Your just “hanging out” living there for her am…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/21 07:42 PM
3

Those countries you are referring to aren’t the starving African children in poor villages countries. They don’t need birth control or anything else there. Just stop breeding with other poor starving people. But that’s humans, they can’t stop won’t stop.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/21 05:44 AM
13

The fuck does any of that have to do with women choosing shitbag husbands and having sex in the middle of a fucking famine in Africa? Women are the gatekeepers of sex. If there’s a famine don’t fuck random ass starving dudes in your village.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/04/21 10:03 AM
3

I used to believe that good honest women sometimes made bad choices. Now, I know that is not true. This may be true for a very few, many more women pretend that they don’t want shitbags, but years of their choices are evidence to the contrary. Shitbags choose shitbags. The only reason there are starving African children on my tv asking for donations, is because a bunch of starving women in Africa just couldn’t stop themselves from having children with other starving guys in the same village. Wom…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/04/21 02:29 AM
4

This guy gets it!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/04/21 05:12 PM
11

Low maintenance is an accurate description. A Honda is low maintenance, because it doesn’t break, not because it’s cheap to fix. People HATE Jaguars because not only are they expensive to fix, they break A LOT. A low maintenance woman who looks good and stays looking good with little maintenance because they aren’t breaking down. Likely good genes and possibly low alcohol, sun, bad food intake.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/04/21 04:32 PM
2

Or just be 23. Women who are 23 don’t need to spend that much to look 23. That’s who men want to date. Any older (or unattractive) woman is spending all that money to look 23. That’s on you girl. Anyway, Any man who spends hours in the gym and on food and supplements to have nice muscles. Girl, you gonna pay for my steak? I need the protein.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/04/21 04:29 PM
3

That’s why I said proper use of the term retards. People who aren’t actually mentally handicapped but choose to act like they are by their own choices and commentary. It currently isn’t relevant to any disabled people anymore because it was removed from the official medical diagnosis of mentally handicapped people, there are many other terms and retard isn’t one of them anymore just like idiot, moron, and imbecile. I have nothing against ACTUAL mentally handicapped people. They didn’t choose to …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/21 10:02 PM
44

Just codified into a book, making it seem like it’s OK to do and apparently what you are supposed to do. In my opinion it is entirely far away from any RedPill concepts which encourages men to become the BEST possible men to attract the best possible women and then how to manage and grow the relationship. FDS just encourages being a horrible person and giving nothing in return except “vagina and boobs” and then not even that but demanding everything. More like “How not to get a Man 101”.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/21 09:48 PM
11

Refreshing! I just want to appreciate the proper use of the term “retards” AND the fact that the mods haven’t removed this comment and banned the person for using it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/21 09:44 PM
4

What is she a super model?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 03:59 PM
1

Thanks for spell checking my comment. I didn’t mean physically posted this on accident. I mean they accidentally posted an actual dating “request” post in THIS subreddit, where people make fun of dating posts. They literally saw “good men” in the subreddit title, and thought “damn I want a good man” and posted here.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/02/21 03:04 PM
6

Someone actually just posted here accidentally trying to “find a good man”!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/02/21 05:41 AM
23

What a suprising good deal, makes you wonder why people turn that down?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/21 09:01 PM
19

And let her have sex with you, a lot.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/21 08:43 PM
1

That’s still the definition in familiar with, but I doesn’t make sense in the context of what he wrote: No, you are a soft-bodied whore. And most of those "kinds" of professions have back rooms for earning hard-bodied dollars. It’s like he’s attempting to say softcore vs hardcore but doesn’t know the words.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/02/21 02:36 PM
1

That’s what I thought too. So, what does this mean?: “And most of those "kinds" of professions have back rooms for earning hard-bodied dollars.” What are hardbodies dollars?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/02/21 02:44 AM
9

Hard-bodied? Doesn’t that mean they work out and are muscular?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/21 11:36 PM
4

Understanding stereotypes is all about understanding they are generalizations of a group. They are NOT supposed to define individuals in that group. If person walked up to you and assumed every single stereotype about a black man with dreads applied to you specifically they are doing it wrong. Especially if you said you weren’t “insert stereotype” and they got mad you were or insisted you were and that you were lying, they would be very incorrect. You are an individual, which by that fact alone …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/21 11:18 PM
1

That unfortunately doesn’t cost anyone any money. It’s cheaper if they do that...as long as they don’t have any children.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/01/21 04:15 PM
11

No he means a bachelor tax. It’s a tax on men that choose not to get married. Then that money is used to fund government programs for women and children. It’s to punish men for not “spending” their high level of disposable income on women and having a family.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/21 01:24 AM
41

The bachelor tax already exists, its called taxes. On every tax form there are a series of deductions for being married, having children, a household, being old, like the list just keeps going. But if you are a single man who is healthy and is not disabled and rents (no homestead exception deductions) and has no children, guess what, you get to pay the FULL tax amount. Now, just to be technically accurate, any women who do not meet any of those criteria also have to pay the full tax. BUT a bunch…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/21 08:10 PM
2

Somewhere on the sidebar of the subreddit there are many definitions and summaries of concepts. But awalt is the initialism of the phrase “All women are like this”. So, whatever the concept someone is describing it applies to all women. Which many men have a tendency to assume women are nice and cute etc on average, but then surprised when they get divorced out of nowhere or cheated on etc. So the logic is learning concepts and then accepting the apply to all women, as something that may potenti…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/21 04:45 AM
2

See, you pushed the goal post there, by adding the bit about the windows and flash lights, to emphasize more invasion of privacy/personal space. Suggesting that my point about walking across the street was different than what women were asking for. Except my whole analogy was that either request is unreasonable. But, I will add, and neglected/forgot to mention this. I do NOT have a fence. Just to be clear if I had a fence this would be an entirely different concept. But as I don’t have a fence, …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 04:03 AM
6

Did you just assume it’s gender? It’s trans fluid non binary /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/21 02:53 AM
2

Are you new to the sub?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/21 02:46 AM
2

I’ll emphasis that I know all of those stats you listed. I’ve often read about this because it interests me. As a result, I’m not making these points because I’m uninformed, I’m making them because I’m very informed. You ended you comment with the idea of helping a small man that was jumped by 4 dude, then relating this helping women. Unless I’m completely missing the point. The idea in the Main Post leading to our “discussion” was that “men need to make women feel safe”. That women “don’t feel …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 01:30 AM
3

The idea that "oh, women want their independence and want to wear what they want, so fuck em if they're scared of me walking at night" sounds, to me, like punishing someone for wanting something they should already have. This is literally the actual result of equality. If I see a small man, who clearly is less physically muscular than me walking on a sidewalk at night, while I'm jogging, I do not make an effort at all to move around this person concerning their "perceived safety." Regardless of …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 12:04 AM
0

If they read something and decide to report or bitch about it, then maybe, just maybe, something hit a nerve and caused them to pause and think about THEMSELVES and how they aren't prepared for dealing with the way THEY handle things in their own life. That's their problem. Hopefully they address it and become more aware of it for the next time... oh wait, that's called being prepared... ...The circle of not being prepared...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/21 08:26 PM
11

Are you saying all tigers are dangerous and should be viewed and handled carefully? -Yes That's sexist against tigers. You're making tigers look bad. -Didn't those tigers maul that magician that one time, to death. That doesn't mean all tigers are dangerous, you can't say that. -Don't all tigers have fangs (able to divorce at a moments notice for no reason into a woman catering judicial system). Yeah but...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/21 08:22 PM
2

I think you are on to something here. I feel like your point, that men AND women should be prepared, is even more valid* as a good point AGAINST*, essentially, the people that argue against this sub or it's ideas. Those people (the women* and men*) are essentially saying to men "don't be prepared because as women we aren't bothering to be prepared, so don't judge us for not doing and also don't do it yourself" It's like that crab in the pocket concept, "women are just pulling all other women dow…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/21 08:18 PM
2

It’s the point that in a post sexist world and post racist world. No one should have to worry about what they look like. What your saying is essentially a really round about version of victim blaming. “If she didn’t wear that outfit, she wouldn’t have been raped”. Women constantly make the argument they can wear whatever they want whenever they want wand shouldn’t have to be scared men will rape them. That’s on men they say, to not rape them, not for them worry about what clothes they wear. I ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/21 05:30 PM
2

See there it is again. “Your argument is mathematically impossible. “ You made that assumption as part of your evidence. But it’s not mathematically impossible. I told you early nature has a creation machine called time and random chance. Time x random chance, literally, create the concept of things NOT being mathematically impossible. So much time and so many billions of galaxies and planets and electrons and photons all randomly colliding with each other eventually form interesting patterns. S…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre14/01/21 02:36 AM
2

See this is what I’m talking about regarding evidence. You are factually in existence. This is correct. This is a fact. It is an observation. Then this happens: Therefore, you were created as all things that exist were. Therefore, you have a creator. That’s not how this works. If anything the answer to that question is my mom. She is the creator. That fact of me existing and being created and genetically matching my mothers dna prove she is my creator. Here I’ll do it: “The sun provides us with …
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre14/01/21 02:25 AM
2

Yes, exactly it’s not considered evidence. Pointing out I exist or that I was created, neither imply or indicate or prove in any way directly that there is a creator. Nature has an amazing generator for creating things called random chance and time. Those two things create all kinds of things all on their own. Example: There is a town in I think Arizona called Mexican Hat, it is named that because there is a rock formation near it way high up on a hill that looks exactly like a Mexican hat or a …
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre14/01/21 02:12 AM
2

It’s not disrespectful, it’s intellectual. Rather than go through each one individually, I just shortly summarized it. I simply read the first person’s post asking for evidence, then you listed your examples and they weren’t actual evidence regarding what they asked about, so I felt compelled to confirm that, in case the first person also read it and wanted additional confirmation. My comment was for them. Evidence: The available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or propos…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre14/01/21 02:02 AM
3

I don’t owe you shit. I’m taller and bigger than you. If I walk past you at night. I’m going to pretend youre a random human. I’m not going to worry about how close I pass you or what side of the street you’re on or how fast I’m walking. Telling me to be careful around you is as sexist as it is racist to tell a black person to walk on the other side of the street because you feel scared of them. It’s up to YOU to stop being a prejudiced.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/21 01:10 AM
1

It’s “wanting something”. You can just “want” things from people. You aren’t entitled to them. That’s the whole point. They are different things, but also the exact same thing in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/21 01:06 AM
2

...None of that is evidence
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre14/01/21 12:45 AM
4

Im almost going from a rational person to an irrationally risk averse person, if that makes sense. This is why it makes sense to me to date/marry another single parent. Because that's the same thing "in essence" that single mothers say "he's my world", "i put him first", etc. People with kids obviously care about their kids, which is good. So, if both parents are putting their kids first, and simply agree to care about the other's kids, you've got a good thing going there. Trying to date a 20 so…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/21 08:39 PM
6

gotta be super careful. Weirdly, considering we're talking about marriage as an end result, I find it odd that this isn't the obvious first consideration; that it needs to be stated and isn't just assumed. For men and women. Not saying anything about you, I just thought it was an interesting turn of phrase. As, if people just go around willy nilly into considering marrying people. Oh wait, that's exactly what lots of people do. (again not you directly, just people in general). (I'm assuming, if …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/21 08:30 PM
11

Have you considered going Brady Bunch style and find another woman with a kid(s)?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/21 05:50 PM
4

Why would any sane man want to date a woman with two kids? Brady Bunch style. You, the dad, already have some kids and your wife died, then find another woman with some kids, who also would have to be awesome (looking, personality, etc, rare obviously), but also already a skilled mom, so not some random 20 something dumb broad who doesn't know how to take care of your kids. That's the ONLY reason. Any single man (with no kids) dating a woman with kids, is just stupid. There are WAY to many singl…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/21 05:48 PM
6

Where do I find women like this? At the house next to the unicorn stables? You asked for unicorn stables, I gave you unicorn stables. If your friends make fun of you for banging unicorns then that's on them. And youre only banging a big girl until you marry her and then that's the whole point, she wont be any more after the makeover you got her. (She also needs to know that is something planned to happen. Can't be a hippy fat acceptance chick.) The added benefit of her being fat, is she wouldnt …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/01/21 04:47 AM
3

I wish I had the time to have you read my entire comment and actually comprehend the parts, where I already covered everything you just said. You: When fat women lose weight they catch up on all the sex she couldn't have and will 100% leave you to have her hoe phase. Me: You have to manage this very carefully because with the new found attractiveness, they can get uppity and demanding and not be used to all the attention. Need to establish "the relationship/marriage" rules/understandings etc BEF…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/01/21 02:34 AM
8

The challenge. It's like riding a wild horse, or climbing a mountain. It's fun but pointless.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/01/21 12:19 AM
6

Fat women. But find ones with pretty faces, you know proportional symmetrical faces. Good bone structure. With bodies that are proportional, good size breasts/ass etc. Marry them. Then put them on a diet and pay for liposuction their midsection, but keep the TnA. You end up with an attractive wife with low N count and low self esteem because she was always fat/unattractive. You have to manage this very carefully because with the new found attractiveness, they can get uppity and demanding and not…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/01/21 12:15 AM
12

"The hardest choices require the strongest wills," Would NEVER fuck this broad, ever. You know porn, with literally the hottest chicks ever, exists right. I’d choose that over, this woman, every time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/21 08:29 PM
1

The difference is in the responsibility. Men will be responsible for their decision while women won't. That's why men make all the decisions. This is were it just gets complicated, because boy oh boy do I know a lot of stupid men, that do no think logically and do not take responsibility for their actions, and many many women as well. That's why I narrowed down this concept of "being able to think logically, and be responsible for the decisions" is just called being smart. Not book smart, actual…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 06:38 PM
1

I am a benevolent dictator of my own life towards my future self. "What can I do today, that will benefit my future self?" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benevolent_dictatorship#:~:text=A%20benevolent%20dictatorship%20is%20a,on%20his%20and%20his%20supporters' A benevolent dictatorship is a government in which an authoritarian leader exercises absolute political power over the state but is perceived to do so with regard for benefit of the population as a whole, standing in contrast to the decidedl…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 06:11 PM
1

I will let you in on my complete and total conclusion on the problem of letting a certain "type" of person vote and how this is ruining america and would ruin any other country. I don't know what you mean by women speaking before permission was bad, but I'll still address what you probably meant. There's a rule in the bible somewhere, that people have interpreted that mean women must be quiet when men are speaking or ask permission to speak. I lumped that under "the bad" because it assumes women…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 06:08 PM
2

It doesn't directly take the money. It just uses the money already taken in general, for that specific purpose. It's a general problem with employed people because employed people aren't able to take business deductions, while self employed/contractors/business owners are allowed to take deductions, or so called "pretax expenses". People in general should be able to take more deductions related to their source of employment, as such I mentioned massages or nutrionalists as tax deductions if you …
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 05:51 PM
1

2) Love your neighbor as yourself. This is the one I follow. One rule covers everything.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 05:44 PM
2

I mean I personally work for money and power too, but that work has nothing to do with my looks. If I had the ability to have good looks, I would become a model, then get lots of money, then open a business with that money and make even more money. I'd assume the problem is the women's version of that is make money from looks, then spend all the money from looks, then juuuust as your looks fade get married to a man with more money than you and then retire on his money. Men, who don't have looks,…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 05:37 PM
2

I agree with what you said also. Any time I hear that we need to go back to the ways of religious morality, I'm like wait, the same ways that said the gays and the premarital sex and the shellfish, but also the women speaking before given permission to speak were bad? It's just such a conundrum I think for religious people because it sure would be nice to know that some book out there written by an all knowing god, had all the right and wrong things to do in it. But when the current available bo…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 05:33 PM
2

Ahhh, gotcha. But that actually is a think. If you work as a stripper or a model, etc. You can deduct work expenses like breast implants and make up and personal training etc, because its a "business." But I working employed in manual labor, cannot deduct a nationalist or "healthy food" or a personal trainer because that's all after tax and has no effect on my "personal expenses".
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 05:23 PM
3

You're right that is total bullshit. Men should be able to deduct a shit load of things if they work a manual labor job, like massages, moisturizer, gym costs etc. That don't necessarily fall under "medical" care. Men Are selling their bodies working at manual labor jobs, they should get the same deductions, even if they are employed rather than working for themselves.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 04:51 PM
9

Women are encouraged to put men 'in their places' because they fear those physically superior and more reckless half of the human race. Every white knight will come out of the woodwork to protect m'lady, mock those evil doers that belch their misogyny and shame those men that dare to declare themselves a victim or complain about some unfair advantage no matter how specific and truthful they are. This is true, its like hypergamy playing tricks on women. They realize men are 'physically' in a supe…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 04:46 PM
1

The simple adage, "if you need god to threaten you with an eternity in hell to be a good person, you weren't a good person in the first place." It wasn't atheism that changed everything, it was financial independence, and letting women into the workforce. Has anyone ever seen a child yell at the parents that their parents are wrong or bad or whatever, and then not do anything or move out, or leave, or run away, because their parents pay for everything, they just eventually resign to accept whate…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 04:41 PM
5

In the world, 49.55% of the global population were women. That's either the minority or basically an equal amount. In China (which has communism/pseudo capitalism) there are soooo many men and not enough women, that women actually gained power, simply by being women. They demand high salaries from men they are with and other luxurious things simply because they are in high demand. Many chinese men have had to seek out wives from other countries surrounding china, while a subset of men have resig…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 04:27 PM
3

"god-fearing leadership" Yeah this has nothing to do with men or feminism. Its just made up mumbo jumbo with random cherry picked rules. People can just look at real facts to understand how society, women, men, etc work and interact. I can find, date, and marry a woman under 25 and start a family, while working on my career just fine without any religious influence.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/12/20 04:18 PM
18

Right. That's my point. IF this story was about a registered nurse with a master's degree making $70k, and she said she "did it" to make ends meet. I'd be like your full of shit. Focus on your job and spend more time training of something than making an Onlyfans. In this ladies case, its just ridiculous to be $15 dollars an hour for that job in NYC.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/20 08:33 PM
17

You'd think so, but lots of private companies like paying people very low wages especially if its a small/medium company so the direct owners make much higher profits.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/20 08:30 PM
31

Multiple roommates, bad food, no savings, suicidal thoughts, bad healthcare...the list keeps going.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/20 08:27 PM
23

My only issues with all this is companies are CHOOSING to pay EMT's barely minimum wage for that location. EMT's are responsible for my life if I'm in an ambulance, I want them to be thinking about keeping me alive, not whether they can pay rent. My only logic to this, is if a nurse for example was making $70,000 a year and made an onlyfans and was like I did it for extra money. Ahh, no you didn't need the extra money. Any money, whether its from Onlyfans or selling blood plasma, is good extra m…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/20 08:24 PM
75

EMTs start at $15, that's absurd. They're there to save people's lives, they deserve so much better. I make more than that, and I don't save any lives.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/20 08:19 PM
1

EMTs start at $15, that's absurd. They're there to save people's lives, they deserve so much better. I make more than that, and I don't save any lives.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/20 08:18 PM
5

good guess on the hieroglyphics, makes sense.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/20 06:48 PM
5

What does "3, down arrows" mean?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/20 06:13 PM
4

Did she just LITERALLY say the quiet part out loud? She even put EXACT ages to it. I almost want to think this is a parody of "dating advice" from The Onion, it's so spot on.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/20 03:20 PM
16

How the fuck does this lady have a kid? Like PLEASE tell me she was married and had a kid and then got into a car accident and the husband died and she was left paralized. You know what, fuck it, I'm just going to pretend that's what happened. Now I can sleep better tonight.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/12/20 12:48 AM
1

Don't lose sight of the point -- that men need to take charge of their lives, that men need to refuse to permit women to run roughshod over them, that the women in their lives don't get to dictate how it will go, and that most women aren't worth the trouble. You are correct on that point. What people are also missing is that women USED to be queens/princesses. If you were King of your country and there was a Queen of her country, you could get married an have a giant country made of the two coun…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/12/20 05:27 PM
0

That's it, he's Prince Phillip. Thanks. You are also correct, that is it rare/anomaly. But it does exist. I will say that in my opinion, the fact that a Queen exists with no King, and that she's crushing it as Queen, and also currently one of the longest ruling Monarch's ever. Just SHOWS that women can in fact "Be a Queen (with powers of a king)" So, it isn't magically gendered. It just makes most normal women look worse as a gender because apparently they could be that awesome (as a king/queen)…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/12/20 04:44 PM
6

lol
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/12/20 04:33 PM
3

Have you met the Queen of England? England doesn't have a King, it has a guy that is married to The Queen. I think he's a duke or something. But you are RIGHT that if you have to say youre a Queen you are NOT a Queen.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/12/20 04:31 PM
7

I've been in groups where a girl would suggest a group chat just to get my snapchat specifically. This is the EXACT opposite of "approaching". Women find it super creepy if men get their phone number threw non-direct means. Theyre like "eww you didn't just ask me, you asked my friend, got it from a website, a group chat, etc" Those girls are doing exactly that. They could chat you up, and then be like "hey whats your number, snap, IG, etc etc?" and then you go "ewww, no youre unattractive". That…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre09/11/20 06:47 PM
24

FDS in essence just proves RedPill was correct first, which is funny because FDS acts like they disagree with RedPill except the core concept of ignoring women and becoming a RedPill HVM, are the exact men that FDS women are looking for... That’s a “woosh” if I ever saw one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/11/20 07:55 PM
1

I think we will eventually get there and have people acknowledge how dangerous women are. I think that right now we are still recovering from the 50’s, and that I mean the complete lack of women’s rights then. Essentially if you married a woman and she “acted up” you could slap the shit out of her to make her act right. And I won’t say that isn’t warranted in lots of cases, as you just mentioned some women are straight up retarded in their actions. The problem came, as every problem, came from i…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre23/09/20 07:46 PM
1

I’ve stated in other comments here you can read, that I 100% think feminine toxicity exists, it’s basically taking female emotions/actions etc and going 110%. And it’s ridiculous that people say toxic masculinity exist don’t acknowledge that feminine toxicity exists as well.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre23/09/20 05:39 PM
1

You’re like 99% correct on the concept that yes if someone is doing a behavior stone cold sober, it’s much more indicative of people’s intentions. However, you’ve missed the point in alcohol, which is that alcohol is NO excuse for behavior, that wouldn’t be acceptable when your sober. Again focus on the underlying reasoning, “feeling emasculated for some reason, a man, purposely goes to a bar and then drinks and fights a person there, possibly trying to start something with a large person, to fe…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre23/09/20 02:15 PM
1

I brought up the Bar as an example of what people mean when masculinity goes to far. Toxic masculinity is a silly term. But the gist is basically what I said in the bar example.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre23/09/20 01:27 AM
1

...but why do they start those fights and are they really fights? Two men fighting can beat each other to dangerous injuries. Two drunk women just hit each other a lot and make a scene, pull hair, scratch each other. I’m not saying women cant do any damage, but whatever their “fighting” over isn’t about feeling strong or masculine. Men who I’m saying in this example will randomly fight someone, just to feel more masculine, if for some reason they are feeling emasculated etc. The only similar sce…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/09/20 11:19 PM
1

The act of starting a fight isn’t toxic masculinity. It’s specifically a guy starting a fight for no reason other than to feel strong or better or masculine or something. Random guy challenging the biggest guy in a bar to fight kinda scenario.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/09/20 11:14 PM
3

Statically, you didn’t fix it. There isn’t nearly as high of a percentage of women, who specifically go to bars and get drunk and get into physical altercations simply to feel manly. Women will “fight” or essentially pull each other’s hair and slap each other for a million stupid reasons but not to “prove they are tough and manly and feel masculine” Men are taught to suck it up, walk it off, don’t be a cry baby. Which is good to learn until it over rides common sense and easy to fix medical prob…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/09/20 09:07 PM
6

Any man who goes to a bar and gets drunk and starts a fight to feel manly, has toxic masculinity. Any man who gets injured or sick and is stubborn and refuses to go to the hospital because that’s for pussies, has toxic masculinity. Being a masculine man is about be awesome, smart, strong, logical, reasonable, just, etc. Being strong enough, that you can physically fight and kill a man but choosing not too because you’re better than that and can use your words to resolve issues. Being masculine/a…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/09/20 08:42 PM
15

Reading this makes me think a big part of what is written about here, is the holdover of how society WAS, versus, how society is NOW. Essentially, less than 100 years ago, women WEREN’T able to choose many of those things. They were able to get good jobs, educations, etc. leading them to being forced to marry young, then couldn’t get divorced, but it wasn’t culturally appropriate to ask out men, so women literally had to choose with what men asked them out, eventually being asked to marry, which…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre28/08/20 12:42 AM
2

Sounds like some isn’t good at holding frame.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/20 03:03 PM
22

No women will believe you, that you’ve observed this. Despite it actually happened and you tracked it. Some how it’s real and also can’t be real/accepted at the same time. Utterly confusing to anyone who doesn’t accept the possibility it’s true.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/20 06:03 PM
79

You don’t NEED to fight with her, she WILL fight with you. What you need to do is “hold frame”, basically have opinions and decisions that are yours and don’t change, like something as stupid as “we’re going to Olive Garden for dinner, she agrees, then in the car, she decides she wants Red lobster”, “nope we’re going to Olive Garden, we already decided.” She’ll get mad, but you just “hold frame”. That’s a fight, that she started, for a stupid reason. But you didn’t bend to her whimsical will. Yo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/20 02:55 PM
2

Has this woman never heard of abortion? Why is she so determined to have a baby? It’s clearly not feasible with her current position in life? Is she expecting some kind of benefit from it? Is someone telling her that the baby is a blessing and totally important to keep, brainwashing her? Are her hormones brainwashing her into keeping it? I’ll never understand the thinking or not thinking of these women that keep these babies. So much wasted on them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/08/20 06:02 PM
1

You mean a wife?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/08/20 09:57 PM
5

I wasn’t trying to tackle it at all, just back up my point, that FDS stole all the well thought out terminology from RedPill, and just used it to their twisted motives. They did spend any time at all as a community researching and developing terminology, just stole it and changed it. Only further proving anyone’s point about FDS type women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/08/20 06:48 PM
35

It’s not their terminology, it’s r/RedPill terminology, that FDS subreddit took and copied and attempted to make a female version of. Except according to r/RedPill a HVM (High Value Male), is a man who is confident, has ambition/career, and works out, basically a man who makes himself high value. Clearly this woman is a LVF, and is sitting around complaining about LVMs. Nonsense.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/08/20 05:18 PM
10

You’re just not getting it. The logic of this woman’s comments and the reasoning of this subreddit is that Women want men to date them, and men want to date women. But for some reason women don’t seem t understand what men WANT from women to date them. Men want attractive women. We’ve all agreed that women can have jobs, they don’t have to cook and clean all day, they can even have sex and not necessarily be virgins or they be cast into a pit of fire before marriage. But what hasn’t changed is t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/08/20 11:29 PM
3

It "feels" better. You go girl, youre free now, find your true love, get out there, youre single "again"... ...not recently out of a failed marriage. Until she's recently out of a failed marriage "again".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/20 03:57 PM
1

Obviously. It’s why I MADE my daughter marry the prince of our neighboring country, to strengthen the relations to our to countries.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 01:17 PM
2

That right there has reached another level of human categories and that category is Stupidity. So, you can be a woman and say you can cook, but burn shit and over salt stuff all the time. You can be a man and say you can fix stuff and tile crooked tiles and install leaky faucets. This people are Stupid. They aren’t refusing to learn how to cook or how to fix things and acting like “they hot as fuck” and that’s all they need. They are just stupid. Now there can be stupid people who try to cook an…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 03:25 AM
4

Someone needs to compile the stats on how lesbian relationships work and apply that to the general “equality” movement.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 10:34 PM
5

You married to a super model? You know how to rebuild a car engine? Otherwise, you’re missing the whole fucking point. Some shit is heavy. Women literally can’t lift it, some men can lift heavy shit AND install it. Now in exchange what can women do, make a god damn sandwich. That’s easy, it’s lightweight. But a lot of women can’t even cook. So, they can’t lift stuff and they can’t cook, what exactly do they add to a relationship?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 10:32 PM
15

Unfortunately, it’s still gross. Tiny boobs are one thing to be born with, this is something else...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/02/20 03:29 PM
25

More important, to give a woman an orgasm you had best be rough, urgent, and hard.What? That's some r/badwomensanatomy right there.Tons of different women orgasm from different kinds of sex. Some even don't orgasm from penetrative sex and need to use a vibrator to orgasm.However, for the women that do orgasm easily from penetrative sex, they will definitely like rough/hard sex, so they would likely seek it out.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/19 04:52 PM
11

You do know what subreddit you are commenting on, right? Are you "white knighting" and under the impression that all of that is bullshit. Obviously, some of it is over exageration and doesn't apply to every single person ever. But, the point of this subreddit is to understand how women possibly come to the conclusion to ask "where are all the good men?" The conversations, anecdotes, research, etc, has led to the information that you just called "all bullshit". Again, its not physics that have ex…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/10/19 04:48 PM
10

Are you new here? Look up AWALT.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/10/19 03:41 PM
82

but you started with average. if you are below average, which i would assume this woman is, then personality doesn't help. she just doesn't want to accept that aging and gaining weight (and not taking care of yourself) causes you to become unattractive. She didn't do anything to gain what made her attractive, so she didn't feel like she stopped doing anything different when she finally got old enough to make a difference. Any fit guy, star quarterback, in high school that girls all over them, kn…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/08/19 04:11 PM
4

Every male 18 or older is a man. I'm waiting with bated breath to hear what you believe comprises a "man." ehh I would agree they are all "male", but I wouldn't agree that they are all "a man". Tribes, for many millennia of human history, didn't have entire processes for boys to become "a man" with training and tests and ceremonies and everything, for no reason. Even other men wanted boys to "man up". You only take men out on the big hunt, otherwise you're gonna get killed by a tiger or a woolly…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/08/19 11:52 PM
6

No one seems to acknowledge that. But its accurate. Girls (women) become attractive to Boys (men) around 12 (like you mentioned: age appropriately). Taking that into consideration that boy and girls do date from 12 - 17, when at 18 men and women start dating. That's SIX years of "being attractive" to the opposite (age appropriate) gender. SIX whole additional years. When people talk about hitting the wall at age 30, and say "ohh thats on leaves like 12 years to date and marry." Boys and Girls da…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/19 02:59 PM
1

Youthful and attractive. Again, when I say attractive, I'm using a very low scale of "simply not ugly" and "somewhat symmetrical" and "not old" and "not fat" and "no wrinkles" and "no years of sun damage" and "somewhat proportional". Her in Footloose: https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/1372333/02-footloose.jpg?w=1600&h=1200&q=88&f=6b0a12f78e4f633ef270e34ab6015075
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/19 11:30 AM
3

it’s universally true It's universally true here. Men and women suffer from reproductive degradation over time, but the first half of your 30s is not considered a risky time, for either. I didn't say "risky". I said "guaranteed better healthier babies". It's one hundred percent a fact that women have "better healthier babies" in their 20's than their 30's. After 30, the quality starts to go down (statically the percentage grows, not every single baby is guaranteed unhealthier), then by 35 it bec…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/19 11:16 AM
5

The flaw in your comment is that Sarah Jessica Parker WAS attractive in her 20's. So, are many average looking women. Attractive doesn't mean movie star, it means not old looking. Check out /r/The_Wall it gives many example of Exactly what I mean by attractive vs not attractive. Again, I'll clarify, I didn't say attractive vs ugly, just based on looks randomly. I said young, attractive for the Purposes of getting married and having children. Of course there are attractive MILFS on pornhub, but m…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/19 03:44 AM
2

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/10/divorce-united-states-dropping-because-millennials/
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/19 02:50 AM
5

Nope. Its simply has to do with the fact that men had the right to choose who they are attracted to and not attracted to. Just like women have that same right. Men are attracted to young attractive women with good personalities with the goal of getting married and having children and a family. Men aren't attracted to old, unattractive 37 year olds, who have AMAZING high paying careers to get married and have children with. Women are attracted to older, 37 year old men, who have AMAZING high payi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/19 02:46 AM
1

I mean, obviously, I’m just confirming someone at least did something right for once (get married and have kids at a reasonable age) instead of every other woman who posts here, that argues they ARE a unicorn and can totally trick a man into marrying them, when they are 37 and over the wall. How this woman handles her marriage from here on out, is up to her to fuck it up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 11:12 PM
3

Gotta start somewhere. If she gets divorced, she’s gonna end up here with a shitty dating profile.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 11:08 PM
1

Nope, but that’s not a good start. Gotta keep it tight.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 11:06 PM
3

However, if she becomes a nagging, sexless shrew like most women - her fading looks will be one more thing to upset him. Ha, I actually thought to say this same idea, just a different way. Originally adding right after "Just don't get divorced" or become a fat bitch and get divorced by your husband, "then the wall matters again. I felt, "Just don't get divorced" covered the whole thing, so i deleted it. But good point for really emphasizing how to keep the wall from mattering while your married.…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 08:59 PM
8

From the Sidebar describing the point of the subreddit: Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but they consistently reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity until they're past their prime. She takes advantage of the nice guy's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of thinking he was entitled to sex just for being nice. See you didn't do that, the sub is about the women, and the confusion about women who DID do that…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 06:51 PM
11

I know I don’t fit in this sub, but I find it interesting to read. You fit in on a "good example" level. Like "Hey look over there, see what happens when you do get married and have kids at a reasonable time, before the wall."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 06:48 PM
32

Great!, Then the wall doesn't matter to you, you got married at an appropriate time, and had kids at an appropriate time based on timing regarding the wall. You're not 35 trying to get married quickly to a guy like you married a while ago, to try to have kids before you get to old. These are the women the wall effects the most. Just don't get divorced, then the wall matters again.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 06:33 PM
33

Fact: nearly half of marriages end in divorce. Gotta update your facts, dude. So few people are getting married these days, that the divorce rate is actually going down! It's working!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 06:25 PM
12

are you married?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 06:23 PM
103

In a world where a single text message from an ex boyfriend can cause a man a life time of poverty and misery (child support/alimony), any man who marries a woman like this is putting his life in the hands of a woman who has about zero chance of remaining stable every day of her life. This comment literally sums up the entire issue of marriage/divorce/women/emotional stability/sleeps around/not-sleeps around/poverty/children/family life/ into on succinct sentence. Literally, depending on the wom…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/19 05:38 PM
2

That is actually entirely accurate.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/07/19 08:05 PM
11

“2. I feel that OP is nowhere near the acceptance stage. It is what it is. There is no changing nature. Sure, you can choose not to play the game, but the game is the game.” This is exactly, my thoughts as well after reading this post. It’s like he’s trying to understand and feel/think out the logic of “the game” and doesn’t like it and wants to change the rules. But the whole point of TRP is that someone/the subreddit actually finally figured out the rules (“what women want, dating, marriage) a…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/06/19 01:41 PM
3

Math time... Where do you get quadruple from? The answer isnt 2 guys, plus 1 guy, plus 1 guy = 4 guys.... She said two stable things. Then describe each stable thing: 1 sugar daddy + 1 Chad = 2 ongoing stable things. The answer is 2 guys.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/06/19 03:42 PM
1

Yes she is advocating having multiple relationships at the same time. They aren’t “full relationships” because obviously you can’t spend all your time with multiple people at once. But they are ongoing relationships with multiple “types” of people sugar daddy, FWB, etc.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/06/19 03:38 PM
1

Have you ever seen a spinning plates show, like the actual show of the guy doing it??? Literally the whole point is he has to run back and forth between the spinning plates to spin the a little bit more here or there to keep them spinning and not fall off the sticks they are spinning on. ie you dont give all your attention to one girl, you need to give each girl a little attention here or there when they need it to keep them interested and dating you, but by doing this you can date more than one…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/06/19 03:34 PM
6

Holy Shit, did anyone see how ugly her friend is. Assuming that a woman wouldn't just randomly include a picture of herself and someone that ugly on their dating profile. OMG that is one ugly woman. But that explains EXACTLY this womans mindset. Compared to her friend she IS a trophy-wife. If that ugly woman friend is any example of the average people this woman's hangs out with then she's is like a Nebraska 10, she's a super model compared to those people, she can get any guy she wants ( in the…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/06/19 04:56 AM
1

because there is no where to banish them too, If a man commits a crime and is convicted of said crime, he is banished to cellar cage. all the land is taken and no more wilderness. This makes land even more static. There is available land everywhere. Many many more billions of people have an opportunity to own land and there will be new opportunities to sell land with those. I don't know what you are talking about with this. When I say "wilderness" I don't mean undeveloped land with trees and dee…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre06/06/19 01:11 AM
1

The biggest problem(s) with any system including basic democracy is 3 basic things greedy people, stupid people, and land. Greedy people mess up any system by simply being greedy, they try to take more than their fair share. This is ultimately achieved by the leveraging of power or money. The rules put in place in economic and governmental systems are meant to limit these greedy people's ability to be greedy, because too much money in too few hands breaks down the economic cycle which functions …
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre05/06/19 08:27 AM
5

If her priority is her career and that takes up all her time like LITERALLY all her time, and "dates" in her twenties, but doesn't actually pursue successful relationships and get married. What's wrong with that is that she will end up "still" dating in her mid to late 30's, which simply doesn't hold as much value to a man with a good career and resources looking to start a family compared to a woman in her 20's. The rest of what's wrong with what you stated, is explained in the post, if you act…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre05/06/19 08:01 AM
9

Do you believe a woman's only worth is what she can offer sexually or keeping a house? She cant make you laugh, think, cry or offer anything other than a hole? Do you feel that it's unfair that woman can have sex whenever they want whereas men have to go out and work for it? Imma jump in here and respond to your general confusion about the topic. In that, you keep confusing a "seperate topic" for the "actual topic". Don't worry it happens all the time, because people/humans get similar topics co…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/05/19 11:31 PM
1

First World Problems
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/05/19 04:56 PM
1

Not really. The guy above me somewhere specifically stated that he was telling a woman that he can cook, clean, even sew, etc and pretty much take care of himself. He has no need for someone to "look after him and take care of him". He is already a better person. Where is the upside if a woman can't make you a better person other than bring sex to the table, let alone bring worse skill sets and personal issues that make you life worse than it was without them. The only way a woman could have "st…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/05/19 01:24 PM
6

What if you are already a better person? Then where is the upside?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/05/19 05:39 AM
3

First cruise ship I'm on that sinks and there is a line for the life boats, and someone yells out "women and children first." Yeah...I'm going to be like ..."scuse me" and push right past the line of "women" and onto that life boat. You're a single independent woman, you can find your own life boat.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre05/04/19 04:48 AM
6

there's a word for that... teenager
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/04/19 03:02 AM
2

https://asiasociety.org/blog/asia/china-long-tradition-dodging-sun-photos Are you retarded? Neither the guy I commented on or myself, thinks Japanese people “stayed out of the sun” and then had pale skin and then had kids who also had pale skin. The point was Japanese people had a “preference” for white skin before they met “white people”. They have a cultural preference for whiter skin. So they didn’t fuck people with dark skin and over centuries/millenia became a country/race of people with li…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/04/19 08:31 PM
1

Country clubs, fancy singles bars (known for older single women) in upscale areas, nice hotel bars; basically places in areas where upscale (single or divorced) women in their 40’s, live.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/03/19 07:09 PM
2

Ah, I see. I definitely won't argue, that less people are getting married today. If we want to get historical, there are many various ways marriage worked, were women benefited or men benefited, or women didn't benefit, or men didn't benefit. But prior to the 20th century, society look down on men or women who werent married. Women were considered spinsters or women of ill reput. Men if they lived in the wilderness were "mountain men" and uncivilizedish. Men who had "long term roomates" were lik…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/19 03:49 PM
2

There's no better day to start than today.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/19 02:57 PM
15

The problem is that "where you are coming from" is wrong, which is why people are disagreeing with you. Men didn't used to do "this", and women did "this" before and they do "this" now. What "this" is, is what this woman did, try to DATE other men in hopes of finding a better man to date, and LEAVE her existing man, for her new BETTER man. Men like to date women and they like to fuck women. Many men date women long term, marry women etc. And they STILL like to fuck other women. They just like to…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/19 02:24 AM
1

Yeah, I'm pretty sure my cut off for "looks" for women, is when they look like a man. If I can't tell you look like a woman at 10 ft, I'm not going to "assume" you ARE a woman. That would be sexist, or trans-phobic, or something.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/19 02:03 AM
7

Weighs the exact same as me, and I'm 6+ ft. Damn, that's a fat bitch.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/19 02:00 AM
4

Is that a man? Did the one gay guy, just out the other dude (for being gay, but hiding it) to everyone?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/19 01:57 AM
2

Have you met the average women?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/19 12:40 AM
-2

Do you work out? If youre under 25 and not crushing it at the gym, you are wasting your testosterone and youthful ability to recuperate. Chicks fuck tons of guys who are 20 and are ripped. Edit: Hey the guy asked... Why don't women fuck with guys under 25?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/19 12:30 AM
28

Those are Chads, those aren't normal men. Normal men can't get tons of women. Chads can do that. So, they do.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/19 12:24 AM
12

Yeah, she fucked up, once, at 18. Wrong. She fucked up twice. Once getting pregnant and twice not seeking the appropriate medical treatment afterwards. If i fucked up at 18 and drove my motorcycle to fast and crashed it and broke my arm and then didnt get medical treatment for it and had a fucked up misangled arm for the rest of my life. I fucked up twice. In a row. You avoid dating people that make that many mistakes. But you don't do that, you go to the hospital to get your arm fixed and put i…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/03/19 02:59 PM
1

That static is oddly wrong. Every girl I meet on dating apps under the age of 30 is 95% likely single and haven’t even thought o marriage yet except the fact ones past 25.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/03/19 01:23 PM
4

Is the girl on the left black? It just looks like two tan white women. I guess they could be Latino also.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/19 11:42 PM
10

He means why is a basic bitch white gurl using slang like that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/19 11:40 PM
29

She’s 6 feet tall ... that’s one HUGE bitch!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/19 11:36 PM
3

Why is she wearing a wedding ring?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/19 11:29 PM
2

I mean more that if you want tall kids you gotta fuck a tall guy. Even if it’s a lottery.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/19 06:52 PM
3

If I by a lottery ticket, I have a chance to win the lottery. If I don't, then zero chance. Gotta pay to play.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/19 06:10 PM
28

Have you seen Japanese people? They've been staying out of the sun for centuries to get that pale skin. That was way before "the white man" came and ruined everything.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/19 06:08 PM
7

Technically, malnourishment can only result in being shorter, so that's a disorder, being taller is a result of having excellent nutrition at key points in growth. However, gigantism is also a disorder, so there's that too. It also kills you much sooner because it puts more strain on the heart.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/19 06:06 PM
2

That's an entirely different issue. Single women with no means of supporting a child shouldn't be incentivized to "create" children. They should be incentivized not to because in many cases the "father" isn't even interested in having or raising a child in the first place and for some reason the mother "wants" to, or "doesn't want" to get an abortion, resulting in a true single parent situation. They should be incentivized to have abortions. It's better for society and cheaper in the long run. H…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/19 03:02 PM
6

and refuses to admit it Seen this happen several times.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/19 04:36 AM
1

Ugh, they're the worst. I said it was a "bad thing." By "they're" I meant "women", I'm not blaming you. I was trying to stay on topic.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/19 04:11 AM
5

Plus Democrats are hellbent on running a woman again this election cycle. Ugh, they're the worst.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/19 03:52 AM
1

I don't know if it's truly correct or incorrect, I just happen to have read about it in an few articles about US federal taxes vs incomes levels. I haven't done the math myself.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/19 03:16 AM
-1

I wasn't attempting to be political just economical, the previous commentor mentioned taxes initially and I was providing feedback to him about how and where tax money ends up. I'm referencing this article: Its seems like only people making about $79,000 and up actually start paying more in taxes than the value they get back. https://taxfoundation.org/60-percent-households-now-receive-more-transfer-income-they-pay-taxes/ I do however agree politically, I think way to much total tax money goes to…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/19 01:32 AM
7

Hopefully, he's raising taxes and is going to finally pay for Medicare for All and all these dumb bitches can FINALLY start getting the abortions their boyfriends refused to pay for. I'd rather be taxed more to stop single mothers than be taxed less and have to pay for single mothers kids.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 09:51 PM
8

The implication here is always that "their" threshold for being pissed off is very low. The road rage bitch or the yell at the manager bitch, or the nag nag nag at home bitch. they are a threat to my life or wellbeing Not doing her unreasonable task the first time she asks IS threatening her well being and her life.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 08:49 PM
13

Lets test this. Someone take this profile make it a guy. Then use some Chad pics. Test the response rate. Some girl: "Oh he's real nice, unless i do something wrong, he just really likes when people don't act up."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 08:46 PM
8

she didnt get skin removal surgery yet. You almost hooked up with a pre-op skinny person.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 08:43 PM
4

2000 years ago in the New Testament. Jesus clarified the "Terms of agreement" before clicking the accept communion button. They're 'More Like Guidelines" he said.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 08:41 PM
13

Someone's going to Heaven on a technicality for following the rules and not the idea behind them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 08:40 PM
-4

Barely, unless you have a fairly high income like a doctor or a dentist. Average income people (and everyone under that) gets back in services almost the entire amount of their taxes. Its only higher income people who pay enough taxes to start having enough left over to cover people like her or her kids on welfare.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/19 08:38 PM
1

Exactly , equality?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/03/19 04:54 PM
1

For some reason I assume you think that if I pick a certain age range of women Im stuck in that age range. I can fuck a 40 year old woman on her yatch one day, then fuck a 32 year old at her condo another day, and fuck a 22 year old in the back of my car after going to the club another day. There's a wide age range of "attractive" women to fuck. There are ugly women with no yachts in the 32-37 year range too.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/03/19 03:57 PM
1

Remember everyone, beat your children, it makes them less whiny. Unless you beat them too much , then they will whine non-stop for the rest of their lives about how much you beat them...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/03/19 03:53 PM
5

Then you'll love this: https://www.reddit.com/r/FuckYouKaren/
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 10:06 PM
2

Let me help you understand why I came to this conclusion. This is you: Piss off communist. You called a person a "communist" on a website for people to read. How English works is we all read a "word" and use the definition "everyone" uses, the one you know from the dictionary. Then you said: a name that has a very real and specific meaning. Then I included the definition that is literally "the dictionary defintion" Then you said: That is YOUR personal definition. Which means that you don't think…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 09:54 PM
3

it implies that she recognizes women are known to be dramatic and exhausting but just saying some men can be too. I have male friends who I've told to fuck off because they are too whiny. I know why she could have included that comment ala what you said. But there are lot of whiny ass men and a lot of men act like there arent any men like that and only women do that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 08:18 PM
1

I stopped there. That is YOUR personal definition. Great so you're retarded and don't even understand how definitions of words work. You don't make up your own personal definition for words, especially words with such well defined meanings like "communism." If you don't like the correct actually definition and want to argue some other bullshit, you just made the english language irrelevant. There's no point in continuing the conversation.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 07:51 PM
1

Try it for yourself I already have. The following is from another comment I made on this same post: I mean "interesting" as in anything other than "acts like her shit doesn't stink, shit tests me all over the place, acts like a bitch, pukes her emotions everywhere, and demands to be wined and dined and taken out and makes me wait 3 months for sex" Interesting means things like: money, nice houses, jet skis, paid vacations, fancy cars, fine dining, boating, exclusive country clubs, etc. I don't k…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 07:41 PM
1

Being a criminal is an equal opportunity job.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 07:27 PM
1

Karen is that you?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 07:23 PM
9

I at least would like to see Men acknowledge that there are some whiny ass men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 07:22 PM
31

You just broke Tinder, the servers overloaded.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 07:10 PM
1

Ewww...She smokes.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 07:08 PM
4

She’s spending more time feeling sorry for herself What? Why does everyone always add these odd additional comments to their comments on here. She's a dumb fat bitch with 3 kids, she's on some dating app trying to lock down another man. She blames each of the 3 kids dads for leaving or being shitty and leaving and takes none of the blame for herself or for her appearance or for her fatness. Why in the world would anyone comment "she's spending more time feeling sorry for herself". She literally …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 07:06 PM
1

and why she has cursed herself I don't give a fuck about her. But, She cursed her three kids too. That's my point.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 06:48 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XyfYc0bfB4
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:50 PM
1

Ha, you specifically responded to that word. I literally knew someone would. I mean "interesting" as in anything other than "acts like her shit doesn't stink, shit tests me all over the place, acts like a bitch, pukes her emotions everywhere, and demands to be wined and dined and taken out and makes me wait 3 months for sex" She has NOTHING interesting except her holes. Except you know: money, nice houses, jet skis, paid vacations, fancy cars, fine dining, boating, exclusive country clubs, etc. …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:42 PM
8

54yoBachelor This guy has no idea what he's talking about, ignore him. /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:28 PM
5

I'm STILL pretty sure a bored 50 year old guy would bang a 40 year old woman, especially if people thought she looked younger than 40 and were surprised when she told them her age.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:26 PM
7

Ahh, I see, I wasn't getting that at all, when I read the same thing. She seemed to be surprised guys would immediately show disinterest in her when she "revealed" her age as 40. So, the guys that were talking to her in bars thought she was younger than that. So, she likely looks better than the "average" 40 year old. But, she said she didn't want to "settle down and have kids, so why do people care she's 40." I take that to mean, she doesn't want to be "taken out and makes me wait 3 months for …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:25 PM
1

Are you some how concerned there is a lot of crime in Detroit? You seem very focused on just how much crime there is there, like literally the exact number of crimes per day. You do understand that crime is crime, if crime happens in one state, its the same crime that happens in another state. Detroit is a dense city with a large population. SO, take some crime and then MULTIPLY the number of people and you get dense inner city crime numbers. Crime in Kansas is way up, but they don't have the po…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:17 PM
1

There are no black people in Kansas, all the crime and drug crime there is like in Breaking Bad vs The Wire. Black people were also most of the Democrats running Detroit at the time. But that would be racist to assume the problem was because they were black. The real issue is the white people (wealthy) moved away and left the black people (poor). So, pretty much it is a poor vs rich problem and a educated vs uneducated problem. All the black people that moved into Detroit already lived nearby wh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:16 PM
11

"not worth it. A 40 year old woman who acts 23, acts like her shit doesn't stink, shit tests me all over the place, acts like a bitch, pukes her emotions everywhere, and demands to be wined and dined and taken out and makes me wait 3 months for sex? All the while concealing her sags, paunch, stretch marks, turkey wattle, and cottage cheese thighs? You gotta be kidding me. Fuck that bullshit." Yeah.... that's not what somewhat attractive 40 year old women tell me. If I meet them at a bar, they te…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:02 PM
1

Yes, that is still missing the point. What you are describing is urban crime. Any urban dense city can have a massive amount of crime regardless of the political party running it. The topic, or at least the topic I assumed we were discussing, is that Democratic policies fucked up Detroit. Where as I suggested that Republican policies also fucked up Kansas. So, yes Detroit also has a large amount of crime, because it is a dense population and Kansas does not. However, it doesn't mean on an instit…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:57 PM
1

if you think Kansas is falling apart, you would literally freak out on many other states in America! Oh, I'm well aware of the many states falling apart. You correct Louisiana is definitely another one. I simply choose Kansas for my example to show the other commentor, that using "how fucked up" Detroit is to "prove" Democrats fuck up things with their governance is a bad argument, because Republicans also fucked an entire state, let alone a city, with bad governance. Kansas is a very very speci…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:50 PM
1

its only considered a huge problem because it deviates from the norm,. What? It's a huge problem because it creates crime which is a "problem" and it's "huge" because the number of people using meth then commiting crimes is a large number. So, its a huge problem. If the people doing meth were poor and could afford meth, they wouldn't be committing so many crimes. But meth is very addictive and lots of poor people use it, so the result is they commit lots of crime to get more money to do more met…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:41 PM
1

Yes, that word does have a very real and specific meaning: a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. I'm pretty sure the previous commentor or any modern politician isn't advocating currently to confiscate all property and make it publicly owned, especially because he said Democrat, not Communist. My dad fought in World War II against real Nazis and Japanese Imperialism, then real Communists in the Cold War. I star…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:27 PM
1

I believe you missed the point, here. The Democrats will probably ruin America, the same way when they took over Detroit. The previous commentor said a particular group running the government in Detroit ruined it. I commented that a particular group running the government in Kansas also ruined it. It doesn't matter who is running it, running the government wrong will ruin any city or state its in. No one has stated that farmers committing a high percentage of crime ruined Kansas. The government …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:00 PM
1

Farmers and Denizens don't run kansas or detriot. The people in government do. Both governments of Kansas and Detroit institute horrible legislation that ruined both places. Kansas Government: https://www.forbes.om/sites/beltway/2017/06/07/the-great-kansas-tax-cut-experiment-crashes-and-burns/#39b734db5508 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/10/donald-trump-kansas-failed-tax-cuts https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-kansas-hard-times-snap-20161121-story.html Kansas Schools: https://www.…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 02:51 PM
13

I'm pretty sure a bored 50 year old guy would bang a 40 year old woman. What I think is happening, is she probably looks good for her age AND its a bar, its dark, people are drinking. So, guys in their 30's think she's in her mid to late 30's. Then they talk to her and she says she's 40, and their like OHHH. Then they lose interest, because they realize she's older than then.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 02:44 PM
3

Teachers? You mean propagandists who will brainwash future generations with liberal conformity and cultural decadence. Ha, not in kansas. thats a very republican state.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 07:12 AM
4

The entire state is bankrupt and all their good teachers moved to Texas because they were way underpaying them. The government is underfunded because they tried to drastically cut taxes for no reason and all kinds of departments/programs are now underfunded. Basically in ten years the state will look like Detroit and all the kids will be stupid.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 06:04 AM
3

Yeah, that’s why I said shouldn’t there be an ACLU for fathers/men. Like a whole group, not just one person who can be pushed around for reporting on it. I hadn’t heard of one, but someone might have.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 05:56 AM
10

I've seen robocop, I don't need to go there.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 05:28 AM
6

If you think Detroit is a disaster, check out Kansas, that whole state is the falling apart.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 05:28 AM
5

Poor in the city - Democrat, Poor in the country - Republican.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 05:27 AM
1

I would maybe say low 30's. It's low enough to appeal to 20's and high enough to appeal 30's. Check out the side bar of the subreddit for a pretty good description of a Nice Guy. Good job, looking to settle down, not aggressive (no motorcycle, no extreme sports), no kids, funny but Dad Joke funny, can't be ugly but also can't be hot. Like if you looked up the definition of an average guy, this guy would be in the dictionary.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 05:12 AM
9

I mean it just seemed like there should be a group tracking some of the negative stuff effecting men. There are many groups tracking all kinds of negative things going on with women. People not seeing their kids because a person is holding hostage doesn't seem "right".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 05:10 AM
1

Gotta create a maximum attraction betabux profile (for research purposes), right age, right pictures, right betaness, good job, resources etc. Then try to ask good questions, lead into them, dont ask harsh direct questions. You can edit the pictures/conversations down to make them smaller/fit. Edit them to feature highlights, not to manipulate the results, because it might take a long conversation to get some solid insightful information.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:41 AM
44

your just a pump and dump Her questioning the effects of "the wall" are even worse than your response, because in her Example, she WANTED to be a pump and dump. She literally said "If a guy doesn't want a relationship and kids, etc, why would it matter if he found out I'm 40, if he already thought I was attractive enough to come talk to and buy me a drink in the bar." Guys are literally deciding NOT to pump and dump her after they find out she is 40.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:23 AM
2

classic postnatal flab. is it?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 04:15 AM
3

I believe it is in reference to the troll guy (who is very ugly, like the woman) in "Monty Python and The Holy Grail." The knights meet him at a bridge and he asks them a series of questions, which he listed there.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:55 AM
3

That is likely true. She is also fat. Fat people (or people who were formerly skinny) comfort eat. They feel sad or lonely or uncomfortable or depressed or scared or frightened or unhappy or .... and they eat food to feel better. So, we could surmise her personality would then lead her to be fat and have several kids from different fathers. Oh wait, we've got conformation - she is currently fat and has several kids. Say "no" to Chad and say "no" to the Colonel and Mr. Pringles.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:51 AM
2

and Socialism is Communism is leftism. Whaaaat? I would have failed my AP History exam back in High School with information like that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:42 AM
5

They need to give away more free abortions instead of rewarding these women with free stuff. 3 kids and this lady isn't even attractive, how is that a betterment to society?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:40 AM
2

You called him a communist. Isn't that a stereotype?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:38 AM
5

People make a lot of assumptions and conjecture on here. Lots of personal anecdotes. Getting hard evidence and first hand responses (rather than second hand) back up what people are commenting about on here is helpful and valuable research. Example: She could be a normal overweight housewife/school teacher who was married and had three kids with her husband, who then died recently (but not yesterday) in an industrial accident. She now has to raise her kids on her salary and her husbands life ins…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:31 AM
13

Fat acceptance movement strikes again. Overweight women are literally making it harder for "a few extra pounds" attractive women to even describe themselves properly. A few extra pounds is literally like 3 - 5 pounds. That is no way meaning "overweight".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:19 AM
1

Exactly! He is implying they will grow up to be poor people who aren't democrats, who will then point at brown people and ask "who took our jobs?" He isn't saying he, himself, thinks brown people only pick fruit, which is racist; he thinks people who aren't democrats think brown people pick fruit and steal jobs.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:15 AM
2

It's also not an effective way to gain research. You have to ease into the questions, start small, and build. Ask open ended questions. Asking harsh direct questions gets people to shut down, you want them to open up and be honest. They aren't under a subpoena, they can choose not to answer.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:12 AM
3

Who is your daddy and what does he do?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:10 AM
1

She don't need no man, why would she listen to them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:08 AM
1

Excellent work. Hard evidence stands up well to scrutiny.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:08 AM
1

You've got to go into their natural habitat to get quality research.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:07 AM
3

"Try Again"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:07 AM
7

Her bone structure of her face still isn't that good. I doubt it was any better looking when she was younger or thinner. Still question who is "hittin that"? Budweiser is ruining America, selling beer goggles so cheap...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:06 AM
6

But Why? You just sorta replied "maybe"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:03 AM
4

Based on his comment he doesn't seem like he's a communist more like just not racist.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:02 AM
6

It just depends where they are born, either way they will be poor. Poor in the city - Democrat, Poor in the country - Republican.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 03:01 AM
5

Isn't there an ACLU for like fathers or men? If there is such a consistent norm or story across the board, how is no one tracking this and reporting on it?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 02:58 AM
19

She hates children. She wants them to be raised in a bad home environment. AND She wants them to suffer and experience poverty. What an asshole. Her husband didn't die in an industrial accident and now has to raise her three kids on her salary and her husbands life insurance policy. She made this happen herself, it was her choice, all three times.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 02:54 AM
19

She's not even the good kind of curvy, which I take the most offense to. There are women who are hour glass shaped and a bit "larger" than average, but the curves swoop from shoulder to chest to waist to hip to thigh. This woman is like the exact opposite of that. Small shoulders, average chest, huge waist, NO hips?, average thighs. What is happening here, is she a guy? Because I'm pretty sure I've seen lots of guys with that figure. This is the ONE body type on a woman that is in NOT allowed to…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/19 02:48 AM
7

Abortion is the solution after whatever birth control they were on FAILED. Obviously, they should be on birth control if they are having sex and aren't intending to start a family. The point is there is a kid in the profile. There wouldn't be a kid in her profile, if she had an abortion. I don't care what she did before that, the end result is she has a kid. She should not have a kid and abortion 999.9% would have stopped that from happening.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/03/19 04:45 PM
15

abortions for the win. Nobody needs to be paying for other people kids.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/03/19 02:30 AM
4

If that reporting has been accurate, it is very suprising that the same sex couples that have the most domestic violence are the ones with two women, its almost as if the person in the relationship who was a woman was statistically causing the problem the whole time even back when the relationships being tracked were just between men and women. If guys are such assholes, shouldn't married gay men be beating the shit out of each other ALL the time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/19 11:49 PM
1

I want to see women get cited for verbally harassing me. Like if i record it and call the cops, she gets a ticket or a misdemeanor. I don't need to take that shit. And I can't physically do anything to shut people up. So, who do I call, the police? I also 100% agree angry ass men should also be cited, I also don't need that shit messing with my day. I'm just out here shopping, working, etc.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/19 10:36 PM
1

The crazy thing is that, seriously was a response back in the 1950's or so. Now, hey yo, that wouldn't fly one bit. What's that statistic, women are now becoming the biggest causes of domestic violence. It's like decades of having zero consequences for your actions are starting to catch up and show through.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/19 10:34 PM
3

I say this all the time. Do you know how much work keeping testosterone under control is. Every single day, I control my temper; my urge to strangle my entire office because they are very annoying, to run people off the road, to throw the person taking all day at the register against a wall to get the line moving. I'm a big guy so I'm pretty sure I could do it too. AND I'm pretty sure people would clap and thank me for getting the line moving. But nooooo, gotta keep those raging hormones under c…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/19 10:28 PM
3

They didn't all ask for it, that's what is causing the problem. Those two really smart women that actually got into harvard, that one sorta older lady who wanted to vote, and the outspoken lesbians wanted rights too. So, we gave rights to them. The other women were busy watching Keeping Up with the Kardasians and then one day all the men were mean to them. Now, they are confused and angry, that men aren't being nice or paying for their meals. I'm pretty sure those few women who got into Harvard …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/19 10:24 PM
6

Men aren't allowed to just punch people in the face if they are having a bad day and their testosterone is kinda high. Why are a women allowed to verbally harass you because their hormones? It's just rude.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/19 10:20 PM
18

It's called research. You spend time their natural habitat observing them. Documentation of observations is very important for quality research. Good job AliBarakat
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/19 02:40 AM
7

Men don’t ask for the same “break.” Women think they can “take a break” so it doesn’t count as being slutty or cheating. But they already want to cheat by fucking some guy they already know and have been “chatting” with or want to go fuck a hot guy on a one night stand situation. You can’t “take a break” and have enough time to date various guys, meet someone and date them for a while make a connection, then fuck them. There just isn’t enough time. So, if a woman has a guy already lined up, she’…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/19 05:18 PM
10

Different opinions or do you mean wrong opinions. Wrong: Vaccines cause autism. Right: Vaccines don’t cause autism. Wrong: The earth is flat. Right: The earth isn’t flat. Wrong: Women who want to “take a break” want to think about their feelings and relax and reflect and men should respect that. Right: Women who want to “take a break” want to fuck other guys. Men don’t have to find that acceptable and can reasonably break up with women for even suggesting it because it’s just “asking to cheat”. …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/19 04:36 PM
17

She-tarding I'm using this from now on.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/19 09:40 PM
5

She looks more like Jafar than the guy Disney cast in the upcoming live action Aladdin remake.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/19 07:10 PM
1

So, they aren't stupid. That means all that "women are the oldest teenager in the house" stuff is wrong. So, men aren't the smarter, more logical sex, they are both smart, logical and have their feelings under control, women just are better manipulators and you just have to resist that or manipulate the situation back against whatever they are trying.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/19 12:10 AM
1

Feminists definitely do this. Men of course also do this this to. It's a "battle of the sexes". But the other on going theory that men discuss, is the oldest teenager in the house concept. The assumption being women are just generally naive, especially when it comes to men, relationships. They use their emotions to make decisions, so they never investigate or read up on or learn factual, logical information about men/relationships. Since, they use the "what ever feels right" decision making proc…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/03/19 12:49 AM
5

I’m always confused if women are truly this clueless or are hiding behind a mask of naïveté I agree that this is the real question. Every time women say "we're not stupid, we're in control of our emotions, women can think too, etc." I then see/read about people like her. If she/other women are this clueless, than most people's point on this subreddit is accurate. Women simply are more clueless in this regard than men, how or why is another matter. HOWEVER, if she/other women are hiding behind a …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/19 11:58 PM
11

he impregnated you twice Once. It was twiiiiiiiinnnnssss!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 11:48 PM
5

Well that's not very catholic. Good luck find a good catholic man to settle down with now.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 11:44 PM
1

Ah, this finally makes sense now! I could not figure out why you were agreeing with the guy "who didn't like women with 5+ guys, calling them whores, etc" OR in other words disagreeing with me about slutty women. Initially based on your original comment, I thought you liked slutty women and were encouraging people on where to find them and how to get them. So, I was very confused why you switched opinions, after I mentioned why I was being sarcastic with the other guy (about disliking low ncount…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 10:29 PM
1

So you don't understand, time value of money, monetary value and physical assets? If a person or a group of people gain enough money they can not be competed against in a free market, they have too much leverage. Because people, humans, only have so much time and energy, if someone has enough money, they can out last anyone else, undercut anyone and sell a product for a loss, buyout entire supply chains. If someone owns a large amount of physical assets, like machinery or metal mines, or constru…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 07:55 PM
1

Oops, apparently reddit's message system isn't that fast at indicating responses have been made. I called it a joke, because its sarcasm. I thought his extreme dislike of low n-count women was funny. So, I was being sarcastic about it. Its funny. Its a joke. It could be called a jab. Either way I wasn't butthurt by what he said. His writing style of dislike for women was so extreme, it came off as funny to me, like too extreme.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 07:31 PM
1

You don't have good reading comprehension either. You lied about the guy mentioning loose vaginas. I never said "the guy" mentioned loose vaginas. I said people comment here about that. I said he doesn't like women who have sex with more than 5+ women, he thinks they are succubi. You lied about the source of the data I gave you. I never said that information was from the PDF, I said it was from the CDC data, which was referenced in the linked article you included. Then you lied about the actual …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 07:14 PM
1

Women with 3-9 partners were less likely to divorce than women with 2 partners That's not in the pdf. From which table did you get that figure? It's not from the PDF, its from this link you included. https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability Which analyses and review that same the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) from the CDC. The copied comment is right in the top section of the page.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 06:55 PM
1

You obviously don't read this subreddit well enough. Many people on here actively comment on how women who have sex with lots of guys, have loose "roastie" vaginas. I don't care, but they comment about it. It's their commentary, not mine. Many people on here actively comment on how women who have sex with lots of guys would make terrible wives. But some people actively comment about how women who have sex with lots of guys are also just terrible people, like they wouldn't even want to date them …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 06:38 PM
1

I'm still waiting for a response. So, do you dislike sluts or not? You either agree that a woman who sleeps with 5+ guys is slutty or you don't. I don't, the other guy I was joking about did. You seem very invested in giving me lots of information to prove that they are slutty, but you have sex with slutty women and don't agree that it makes them bad wives. I just don't understand your point here with all the pdfs, websites, and details other than to be argumentative.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 06:09 PM
1

Support this claim. The only thing keeping a free market from existing, by definition, is government. A literally everything. The stock market, insider trading, monopolies, underpaid workers, the fact that people had to die in strikes to get reasonable 5 day work weeks, current income inequality, literally any third world country, the fact that a totally free market economy never just pops up somewhere, the fact that most of human history has featured "rulers" that somehow owned most stuff and l…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 05:34 PM
0

Anything the government does, a truly free market can provide better for cheaper, privately, and without the immorality of removing your consent. If people want those services, they will pay for them. Good ideas don't require force. Yeah, that's wrong. Only people with no actual understanding of history and the various historical attempts at economic systems would think that. You don't understand that a free market is impossible to have due to humans being involved. Greedy people will always fuc…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 05:11 PM
1

Yeah, that administration definitely fucked up a lot things on a national level.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 05:01 PM
1

Medicare provides health insurance for Americans aged 65 and older or some disable under 65 people. But basically old people. Medicaid covers poor people. If somehow, Medicaid technically falls under the budget of Medicare, I dont know that, but it could.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 01:00 PM
1

More than half the country doesn't pay any taxes?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 12:57 PM
0

You ever use GPS on your phone, voluntarily? It costs like a billion dollars to run every year, that's paid for by the US military, who then bills you, by sending you your tax bill. So, you also know exactly how much you used the military for your protection last year? How much the state department negotiated with other countries on your behalf for treaties and other negotiations? Would you like the FBI to send you a bill every time they stop a serial killer in your area? Because they do send a …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 12:55 PM
1

wasting my time with your essays You don't like detailed responses, but you don't understand generalizations very well either. I don't like stupid women, I don't care how many people women have slept with, I don't like/date women who have had babies. There, that's my opinion, change my mind. Cool, I'm gonna trust the data on this one, rather than a guy who seems like hes never even had sex before. I have no idea how I "seem" but I literally told you I exclusively date bisexual women. I'm very in…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 12:20 PM
1

I read your entire previous reply, including a large chunk of the linked PDF. I read it before I replied the last time. When I said I understand it, I meant it. I learned nothing new reading any of that, because I knew it already. The basic gist is that women who have sex early and have large numbers of sexual partners make terrible wives. That's about it. Early being like 14 and the number of partners being in the low single digits. This excessive slutiness, creates problems like they can't pai…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 02:59 AM
2

So, a certain generation of American's wasn't taxed adequately enough? Who do we need to send the correct updated tax bill to?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 02:32 AM
0

Whatever man. If you drive on the roads, you gotta pay for the roads. Otherwise youre just stealing. Paying taxes is paying for public services. How much you should pay and what services you get in return is pretty much up for debate. But unless you live in the woods on an island in the middle of the ocean, you using some kind of public service, whether it be military protection, governmental standards on electrical, telecommunications, water, etc, roads, education systems, police forces. Somewh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/19 02:30 AM
1

The part about a large amount of black people being poor? Or the part about abortion, slowly and effectively reducing the population of poor, uneducated people?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 12:34 PM
1

What? I still don't understand the issue here. I didn't want to out right make fun of the guy for not liking women who happen to have more than 5 partners. His reaction and preference for calling women with literally super low ncounts like 6, was whores, sluts, and succubuses. That's number is so low, its silly. So, I joked that he lived in a magical place filled with whores. Clearly he didn't want to live there because its full of whores, but since I like slutty women I wanted to live there. Th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 12:11 PM
1

As for the generations before that, the money was still stolen from the general public, as it was taken from them without their consent. You consented to it by A) being born in america/moving to america B) voting for a representative government officials If you don't like how a country operates you can always immigrate to another country or vote for politicians that don't tax certain things Having a US Passport/Birth Certificate is consent to federal taxation Living in a certain state is consent…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 11:47 AM
3

largest budget surplus in more than a decade https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/27/californias-fiscal-risks-despite-largest-surplus-in-more-than-decade.html
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 11:41 AM
1

She's wearing her thong wrong, its too high on her hips... ...PASS
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 03:12 AM
1

Not on a national scale. It's a big number, but its not daunting. The size of Social Security is daunting. The size of Medicare is like the entire budget of a small country. But, $360 Billion, that's only $1,000 per person in the United States.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 03:05 AM
3

What? Are you trying to give examples of what big numbers are? I don't understand. Sure, I'd take a raise of 9%. Why not. But 9% of a 100% budget, is a small number, it's less than 1/10 of the budget. The previous poster said that 9% section of the budget is " the lions share of my taxes" Lion share would at least be more than 50%, even closer to 75%. 9% is smaller than 50%-75%. So, not lions share.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 03:00 AM
2

Is anyone going to admit, that black panther wasn't that good.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 02:56 AM
6

I had a child on purpose You had a child on purpose as an unmarried early 20's woman? How would that have been on purpose? By which I mean what would be the purpose of having a child as a single unmarried early 20's woman?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 02:51 AM
1

They stole from that pile of money anyway. They stole the whole first generation of social security?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 02:39 AM
7

I didn't ask why people pay for social security. I'm asking a theoretical question of why the current young generation is responsible for paying for the current old generation. When they invented social security, they set it up what way, instead of just setting up the system, so that the generation that pays in, gets paid out the same money. Regardless of massive shifts in population if it was set up the way I'm suggesting, its always funded. Also, corporations that misuse and mismanage peoples …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 01:55 AM
3

Yes, that's currently how it works. It shouldn't, but that's how it works.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 01:51 AM
1

It’s more sarcastic humor, than a specific haha joke. If you get it, you get it. If you don’t, you don’t. But you did ask why I was asking about slutty chicks, even though I know rule 1 and 2. That was the answer. There’s a pretty amusing divide on this subreddit, guys who don’t mind women who fuck a lot of people and guys who despise women who slept with more than 5-10 guys. I personally don’t get it, so I find it funny. If a not-slutty chick fucks 5 dudes and gets pregnant 5 times and has 5 ba…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 12:13 AM
-1

Free money for old people who had free education, could buy a house on minimum wage, and failed to properly raise their children? That’s the stupidest part of social security, young people today are paying for the old people, then you have people like that guy, complaining that we're "giving" free money to old people. It's not "free money" the old people already paid in, they should get the money paid out. But they didn't pay "in", they paid for the old people when they were young. This is why s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 11:03 PM
28

https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/policy-basics-where-do-our-federal-tax-dollars-go Looks like it's only 9% of the federal budget goes towards Social Safety Net programs. Medicare and Social Security for old people makes up a significantly larger portion of spending.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 07:44 PM
2

I said 500+ by 30 is kinda whorish, the other guy said 5+ in a lifetime. Sooo, split the difference and go with 247. If you've banged more than 247 different women, you might be a man whore. So, anywhere under that, its just fine.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 07:29 PM
1

You also expressed interest in finding out where he lived, since you'd like to have sluts throw themselves at you. That was the joke. I understood he very much doesn't like sluts, like on a base level is offended by sluts. So, he doesn't like them and doesn't want them to be around him. Now his definition of a slut is a woman who has had sex with more than 5 people, so there that. I jokingly implied, what he meant but slut, was literally a slutty woman, one who likes to fuck guys a lot, do slutt…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 06:21 PM
1

He implied he didn't want sluts all over him. (The actual reason being he doesn't likes sluts). I implied that he didn't want sluts all over him, instead, because there are "literally" to many of them throwing themselves at him, where he lives. As in, it became annoying. "Man, I couldn't even get to the grocery store today, without sluts just throwing themselves at me".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 06:08 PM
1

Exactly. It's pretty straight forward, its just two steps, but many people don't follow them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 05:55 PM
1

Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. That sounds a lot different than what I said. Promote abortion in poor lower socio-economic areas and tax better areas to provide high-quality education to those same poor areas, as well as require good paying jobs, reducing the need to have welfare in the first place, welfare being a system of paying …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 05:48 PM
2

Step 1, be attractive. Step 2, Don't be unattractive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 05:41 PM
2

Promoting large amounts of abortion in poor areas is anti-family. But its also anti-single mother. It stops the problem before it starts. No more poor stupid, no more problems. We're not allowed to "abort" adult people, so all we can do is "pay them off" with welfare until they die. If the government gave a $4000 dollar tax rebate to women for every abortion they had, the problem would be solved very quickly. Instead they give a $4000 dollar tax rebate to women for every child they have, and it …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 05:33 PM
4

A single white female would have taken a big hit to her social status, If it was, it isn't any more. Look at all the women that are posted to this exact subreddit. Literally single while female mother, again, and again, and again. I think its just a general poor anti-education culture that is prevalent in poor areas, whether it be white or black. For some reason hispanic people are more pro-family. Poor people are stupid and stupid people are poor and round and round it goes. Stupid people make …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 05:22 PM
1

The specific information I have is that I went to one of the underfunded bad schools and saw first hand how it was and I had friends that went to good schools and they saw how good it was. Luckily I some how had more friends at the good schools than the bad school underfunded school, so I was more motivated to get a good education etc, than the other kids at the school. I'd say its a cycle. Which started at some point. Anti-education culture, leads to limited incomes, which leads to poor area, w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 05:15 PM
3

Welfare was only eligible for single families, forcing the man out of the home to collect benefits for the reasons following. This I'll agree was a fuck up, should apply to anyone or any family like it does now. There is also increased welfare "each child", which gives incentive to have more children propagating the system. I mentioned earlier that, I believe abortion should be tied into the welfare system, that rewards reducing people in that socio economic culture, rather than promoting increa…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 04:56 PM
10

White people, latino people, and asian people all have equal access to welfare. Welfare just exasserbates long standing institutional problems with american black culture, which I think leads back to a lack of good education available for them. Being ignorant is a point of pride for them, as it is with poor white people in alabama, west virginia, any trailer park, etc. Having pride in being stupid and disliking and listening to advice from "smart folks" is just a bad feature of "poor culture". W…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 04:05 PM
8

Weren't there always "poor black people"? Poor black communities started out with freed slaves, obviously they were poor, because they were previously not being paid. Then there were decades of government, local, state, federal, rules and policies that didn't allow those communities to grow and mix with the wealthier, education white areas. So, to this day, there are still poorer socio economic areas that are significantly black, but also more and more latino as well. Welfare keeps these people …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 03:55 PM
5

Bad education meaning bad schools, underfunded schools, "inner city schools", etc. Most schools are funded by property taxes, so its well known that "good" schools are in mostly wealthier areas. Poorer areas don't have the same funding for schools, so they don't function as well as they should. Many black communities are poorer socio economic areas. Or alternatively a large percentage of black people live in poorer socio economic communities. Bad schools lead to bad education leads to being stup…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 03:50 PM
0

is it though? or are they just raised with a bad education and culture that predates the welfare state.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 03:20 PM
4

Yeah, that is what she’s doing. That’s why every time I see one of this lower quality women demanding tall men, I raise my standards even higher.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 12:28 PM
2

I do like a woman in shape and round not being an option, nothing yet lol I was responding to this. I thought you meant you liked in shape women, but you had found "nothing yet". So, i made a suggestion that worked for my friend on where to find them. He did not find many at random local bars.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 04:28 AM
3

I was just kidding about buying drinks, I don't do that. It was exaggeration to emphasis how few slutty women throw themselves at you is, in most places. But they do where you are. Gotta find out what bar you go to.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 04:16 AM
2

My friend joined a running club, met a bunch of women in shape there. You gotta be into running to be into that club, so lots of girls who are in shape.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 04:13 AM
7

Yeah, you said slutty women were throwing themselves at you. That doesn’t happen everywhere. I really doesn’t happen that much any where. So, where ever you are, there are slutty attractive women throwing themselves at men. So I want to know where that is, to go there and bang those chicks. I’m wasting my time going out talking to chicks, buying them drinks, etc. And youre just sitting some where that there are so many slutty chicks throwing themselves at you, that you have to fight them off you…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 03:39 AM
9

I just wanted to know where this place is. Chicks aren’t usually throwing themselves at guys, so wherever your at, where your at, sounds pretty good.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 03:31 AM
5

Are you having an issue with slutty women throwing themselves at you?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 03:22 AM
9

I’ll take em. I like Incubus, they are a good band.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 03:18 AM
2

She’s got one of those red dog dicks on her shoulder, such bad taste in tattoos.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 03:17 AM
7

Being 6+ too, the more I read these chicks are getting pickier and picker for 6+, the more I get pickier. Every fat chick, ugly chick, super tatted up/ear gauge chick I see that is like “only 6+”, I tick my standards up, little prettier, boobs a little bigger, waist a little smaller, personality a little better. The demands they are making, are making me less and less likely to even consider dating any of these women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 03:15 AM
1

When a guy lands a super hot chick, all his guy friends congratulate him because they know how statistically hard doing that was. They don’t see that and think “oh he did, so lll just walk to local bar and pick up a model too, it’s easy, he did it”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 03:11 AM
38

Nah, it’s a pretty good point. Some people like having sex. Some women have sex a lot and some guys have sex a lot. That leads to high no ncounts. Now, I’ll agree that if your somehow in the 500+ category by the time your 30, that’s pretty high. You clearly have sex with lots of people and didn’t really have any long term realtionships. However, the offensive thing is the misleading of it all. If a girl comes across as timid, non-sexual, taking it slow, “I don’t do anal on a first date” kind of …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 02:59 AM
1

I mean asking anything sex related would be weird then, if you don’t have sex. For other people who do have sex, it’s generally thought of as rude or a very forward question. Or it makes the woman seem very slutty/sexual . She is very slutty/sexual, her words, so it’s not a big problem for her to ask. However, if I was a girl and I was going to get married before having sex, I probably would ask, because if it mattered, I wouldnt want to be surprised on the wedding night, lol.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/19 03:36 PM
1

One girl I know, just like big dicks. She has big boobs, so sorta fair? Anyway, she hates to date a guy for a bit, then get to the D and think “oh no, not big enough”. She found it ackward to either have sex with them anyway, then break up with them. OR not have sex with them and some how explain it’s specifically because of not big penis. She eventually found it easier to just ask early on.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/19 03:21 PM
2

Too funny, I just had an argument in another subreddit, when I said feminism today is overreaching and trying to gain superiority over men. Many people argued that "that's not the goal, the goal is equality" I will be reasonable and say that I get the original original point of feminism was to gain acceptance that women are equal to men. They should have the right to vote and to have jobs. My point as of today's society is they achieved that, so what's left for radical feminist activists to figh…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/19 05:59 PM
3

When I see men have the right to decline fatherhood of a baby ie no child support, women be severally punished for false rape accusations ie perjury in court, and marriages allow for predetermined non-50/50 asset splits. I'll finally feel women have achieved taking some responsibility for their actions and feminism achieved its goal off equality.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/19 05:32 AM
3

A good point then. The parents are facilitating them not maturing past being teenagers. They don't need to because their parents will "take care of it".
/r/TheRedPill21/02/19 04:52 AM
3

The girls tearfully gave statements in court that they were too immature and it was the adult’s fault.. That's called lying. That's not a lack of maturity. They knew how to get out of trouble and it was by not taking responsibility.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/19 04:06 AM
15

"He got me pregnant" Bitch, you got your self pregnant. If I go to McDonalds and order a Big Mac and McDonalds give me a Big Mac. Did McDonalds MAKE me a fat fuck? No, I found the McDonalds, I ordered the Big Mac, I ate the Big Mac. She even said the app worked. She found a guy, She ordered some dick, and she took that dick without being on birth control or asking him to wear a condom or taking plan b afterwards or getting an abortion. OMG, can someone start a charity that just puts up ads every…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/02/19 06:39 PM
4

Manager at a retail store. She is the Executive (Manager) of the Sales Operations (Sales Staff) at the store.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/02/19 03:21 PM
3

Is she retarded? None of those reactions to any of that make any sense. Like its one thing to be a woman and be illogical, but this is on a whole other level of just being retarded and almost imagining shit, she needs to be on some psych meds.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/02/19 03:13 PM
13

I think he has the gun in his hand in that scenario, not her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/02/19 03:59 AM
1

"She's a man, baby" Classic Divorced Dad by 35, has a good job, but has 5 kids shared with the other parent. Likes to party a little, but not all the time. Was she wearing pants?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 04:16 PM
7

That was crazy. 26 I can understand, but 16 or even 20. WOW.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 04:13 PM
17

It's like code for escorts. They can't specifically say what they are offering in postings. They have to write code for the people that are in the know.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 04:11 PM
11

I'm looking for a man to be my Rock. Because I'm a boat floating in the sea, I need someone to tie myself too. But I don't want to be a rock, I still float with the waves and the tide.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 04:10 PM
3

Oh shit. We gotta "Nice Girl" here. Looking for a "Nice Guy". Luckily there are plenty of them out there. Oh wait, that's not what she meant....
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 04:08 PM
2

I view it as two separate solutions. If you are a responsible adult that takes precautions and birth control etc and somehow, somehow, the woman gets pregnant. Then great, you know abortion exists, boom solve the problem. Now, if your unlucky and this somehow happens two three times in her entire life, I can't control how lucky or unlucky that person is. But its not a one time thing. However, lower socioeconomic people that are dumb. I just can't put restrictions on that. Those people just refus…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 03:55 PM
3

Exactly. I don't get the "do it for the children, every life is sacred" concept. People joke that rich kids were lucky to be born to rich parents. So, poor kids, or kids with stupid parents (OR parent) are unlucky? If I had a choice between being born at all and being born in a trailer park in America or born in a dusty, starving, impoverished town in Africa. I would choose neither. Just no. No thank you. I would have to grow up there and live there in that horrible situation, why subject a pers…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 03:45 PM
1

abortions to stop there from being unwanted babies being raised by dumbass single mothers resulting in more dumbass people. Should people be using birth control yes, but abortions sure do solve the ones that fucked it up. Birth control should be universal and free.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 02:43 PM
7

why doesn't he want to buy my vagina Because ewww vagina. ...Well at least to him
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 05:08 AM
1

That sounds like a sound plan. What about women in their late 20's, do you find them to be immature still or just the early 20's? What metropolitan area do you live in that you are getting that many plates at that age. I don't think it would be easy in Iowa or somewhere like that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 03:59 AM
1

Oh. That's a lot more days than I was hoping for. I generally figured women were fertile and then had their period for a few days and then maybe a few days later fertile again. So, only during their period and then a little after, they were not fertile, but I don't fuck on period, eww gross, so that leave like only a few days of infertility. When you worded it the way you did. I thought you meant women were fertile like a few days then they had their period and the rest of the time not fertile a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 02:40 AM
1

Nope, it's a Tide Ad.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 02:34 AM
11

Tyrone worked out a lot in his last stint in jail. So, he's got muscles. He's got a blinged out car and some cool clothes. So, he's peacocking. He's got an apartment with some drugs. So, he's accessible and fun. He doesn't give a fuck. So, he's confident and doesn't worry about what she's complaining about this time. He's aggressive. So, he initiates and leads and fucks. His has a big dick? I don't know what you can do about that one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 02:20 AM
1

What does tracking periods do? Tell you NOT when to have sex with them?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 02:08 AM
3

He later learnt from her bragging to her friends that the whole time they were trying she kept taking emergency contraceptives and was on the pill. WTF is wrong with these people?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/19 02:07 AM
6

Why do people write dating profile descriptions that make them sound utterly retarded with zero command of their native language? I don't disagree that stupid people exist. But he asked why people write their profiles "like this." Your saying every person who writes a profile like this doesn't know "wit" is spelled "with". Like if they had to write to a job or a company or in some legal document, they would write "wit". Again, I agree that there are plenty of stupid people who would because they…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 08:44 PM
0

You misunderstood what I said in regards to him “being there for her and his kid”. I’m implying that since he thinks “abortion isn’t the solution”, I’m saying I hope he thinks he should support HIS kid and Be there for HIS girl. If you’re a man and you say “women shouldn’t have abortions” but you dont support being a husband and raising YOUR kid. Get the fuck outta here. You want to Make her have a baby, even if she gives it up for adoption, but you don’t want to be responsible in anyway? Now, i…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 08:11 PM
2

I think you overestimate how many 'good cars' there are out there. Seems to me that there's only Toyotas with Mercedes-Benz pricetags available these days. Oh no, I agree a hundred percent. This is essentially my problem. I happen to be one of those men, that the women are define as a "Good Man" , 6ft plus, good job, etc etc. Then I'm like where all the good ladies at, and I'm like toyota, toyota, toyota. People joke women can't cook and have great careers. Its true. Can't a woman learn to cook …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 07:25 PM
3

available on FarmersOnly.com
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 07:19 PM
26

Gay farmers would probably be very successful. Two hot strong men working twice as hard doing all the farming, while at the same time have an amazing well designed farmhouse with a white picket fence and a farmhouse style kitchen. Then they adopt two cute mexican children, who grow up to help around the farm. Why wouldn't gay dudes become farmers...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 07:17 PM
23

Show me Strong father figure... Census says... In America: Asian men have highest median income of all men ... And Asian women have highest median income of all women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 07:13 PM
12

Damn you Fifty Shades of Grey. Quick someone write "Fifty Shades of Grain"!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 07:11 PM
1

I get what your saying but like he said abortion are not the solution. It doesn't fix the problem people have it just fixes the situation. The problem is that women are having children that they shouldn't be having. The solution is to sterilize these people, like we do dogs and cats. We do that because dogs and cats can't stop fucking. BUT that would be wrong because we can't pick and choose which people to sterilize. Even stupid people are allowed to have children and families. So, "THE PROBLEM…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 07:06 PM
3

Get Carfax!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 04:18 PM
2

Saying "buy a good car" goes against the point of the metaphor. His point is that a car is still a car, shitty or not, and if you don't need a car, you don't need one. Exactly, It does go against the point of the metaphor. I understood the metaphor, and then replied with a response opposing it. Some men see these women in this subreddit and go Mgtow. I see these women and go damn, these are not quality people. I'm going to go hit the gym, so I can buy one of the good cars. Seeing low quality car…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 04:15 PM
1

I'm replying to you, I am me. This was the metaphor: This woman is a car, but you can take other modes of transportation. ie not date women. I'm replying to that metaphor, like a person would reply to a hippie. I like cars, awesome gas guzzling cars, that are bad for the environment. But I only like nice cars, luxury automobiles. Not cars being sold at a used car lot with high mileage and some how come with a trailer, that you have to haul around (ie kids).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 04:02 PM
5

HA
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 04:01 PM
14

No, I got it. I just responded with my take on the metaphor. This woman is a car, but you can take other modes of transportation. ie not date women. However, the previous poster mentioned this is woman is a shitty car with lots of maintenance issues. My reply was "or just go buy a good car". However, the implication is not everyone can just go buy a good car, because really good cars are expensive. Not everyone has enough money to buy a good car, but they don't have to buy a shitty car, they can…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 03:55 PM
9

I would never ever pick abortion. That's fine, everyone is entitled to their own personal choices. I'm assuming youre a man, so if you choose no abortion and had baby with this woman, you would be there for her and the baby and not just disappear and never pay child support. Like the guy in this woman's life likely did. I strongly disagree. Abortions are not the solution. However, since its your choice and you don't want to create firestorm, don't say things like this. "Abortions are not the sol…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 03:45 PM
69

Be an asian man and date her, and throw everyone off. People would just see a very diverse clothing commercial, where ever they went as a family.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 03:20 PM
24

Its like an accent. They do it because everyone else does that they want to be around. They know how to spell they choose not to.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 03:18 PM
15

do women not date farmers anymore? i assume a small town is some how near farms.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 03:17 PM
35

or just go buy a good car.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 03:15 PM
37

murder/goblin face OMG, I've always tried to describe that face and why I didnt find it attractive. That's a perfect description.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 03:11 PM
24

Abortions are literally a solution. They don't do anything except solve a problem.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 03:09 PM
1

“Some men don't know that women may not reciprocate as men would“ This statement is why I specifically wrote out the eating a sandwich at a restaurant example. If you eat the sandwich and just leave without paying, the restaurant isn’t “wrong” for not knowing you wouldn’t pay, that you were going to steal, that just expected to eat the sandwich “for free”. No, the person not paying for the sandwich is wrong. They should know it’s standard to do it. Just the same way it’s not wrong that “that som…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 03:08 PM
1

Again, he didn’t project anything. It is a known thing. If you go to a Restaurant and eat a sandwich, they are expecting you to exchange cash for that sandwich. Everyone knows this, it isn’t a surprise. If you do a favor for someone, they do a favor for you, or at least something nice in repayment. Everyone knows this, if someone doesn’t do it, they label that’s person as selfish and ungrateful. My implication was why these guys get to the “sexual favor” idea so fast. Women are more than willing…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 02:39 PM
7

The man didn’t concoct it in his head, it is standard between guys. You do a favor for a guy, that guy does you a favor. Women will just go “omg thanks!” And think that’s it. Now is a guy going to invite a girl over to help move, build a deck, fix his car? What favor can they do? Make a dinner, cater an event, clean his house. No, these are demeaning. If she is an accountant she could do his taxes, but not ever girl has a useful career. So, some guys are left with the idea of “sexual favors”. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 10:46 PM
2

That might be why she mentions his name so prominently. Plus his name is "prominently" tattooed on her ass. So, kinda hard not too.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/02/19 07:34 AM
1

It’s such a different problem it’s not even comparable, it’s still bad but just entirely different issue. This lady is having a baby and has no possible way of raising it properly and apparently we are all assuming the baby daddy isn’t putting up some big money child support. So, her thought process is I will get a guy to date/marry me and pay for me and my bastard child at 20, so she’s probably pretty stupid, so not that great of a wife, etc etc etc. All she has to do is get an abortion and it’…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/02/19 06:29 AM
2

"At her age, 20, she has many more fertile years to learn things, find a man, settle down, have a child in a productive environment." That's dangerous to tell women these days. And essentially what feminism tells women. That IS dangerous to tell women, I left out all the important details, because I was talking to people on this subreddit. When I say many more year, I don't mean 48. I mean like 20 something. But even 20 (her age) to 29. That's like a decade. Plenty of time to learn how to be a g…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/19 06:04 PM
4

What about adoption? There obviously aren't enough infertile couples that "really" want children, so the only way they can raise a child is to adopt one. Sure, there are also some gay couples too, but the math doesn't add up. There are so many women out there having unnecessary children, that there are just tons extra kids floating around in foster care systems around the US. Parent's aren't dying in car crashes, house fires, diseases, industrial accidents like they used to back in the day, whic…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/19 05:42 PM
5

Oh I do. Your comment was that some other people don't. So, since it really seems that "those" people "really" don't want women to be having abortions in "those" states, women who are "prone" to become pregnant, but aren't "prone" to be married or in solid relationships, should get the fuck out of those states. Cause otherwise you end up with the women we see on this subreddit asking for bailouts cause "they accidentally got pregnant" so some how that means they "have" to have a child, so some g…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/19 05:32 PM
3

Slutty women need to move out of those states.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/19 04:34 PM
16

Whaaaat? She got pregnant. She had two choice 1) stay pregnant or 2) stop being pregnant. At her age, 20, she has many more fertile years to learn things, find a man, settle down, have a child in productive environment. So, obviously, there a bunch of people all over that are like "oh no don't have an abortion have a baby" Well, she's the perfect case for an abortion. Stupid, No job, poor, only 20. Get an abortion and move on with your life. I don't know who is advising this woman to keep that b…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/19 04:08 PM
22

Why is she pregnant in the first place? I don't care how much sex she has had or how little. There is no reason for her to be pregnant at that age. If your gonna be a single mother, you don't have your life together, why is this woman not getting an abortion. So so dumb. There is no reason to have a child at that stage of her life.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/19 03:05 PM
12

That’s still not how they work. Comparing ball sacks with vaginas doesn’t make any sense. Does your dick get droopy with age? Does your asshole get droopy with age? Dicks can get hard at any age, and vaginas can be tight at any age. The woman just needs do kegel excercises to keep her muscles strong and tight. The man just needs to do cardio and some excercise so he has enough blood pressure to get his dick hard. Older lazy people gonna have loose vaginas and floppy dicks. Two 48 years who Worko…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/19 10:27 PM
23

Be sexually attractive and be marriage minded, have some resources = marry Victoria Secret model, not some generic looking girl with a gender studies degree. You combine the two and all of a sudden your out of most girls leagues.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/01/19 10:02 PM
2

That is very interesting. The other day I just wrote this response below on another post. Its funny how similar/accurate it is to what you just wrote about the relationship dynamics. Original Comment: What I see at my upper middle class professional socio-economic level, on the local anonymous internet forum, is moms constantly complaining that their husbands are incompetent, useless around the house, emotionally unavailable, sexually boring, "just another child to take care of", lazy, dad bod, …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/01/19 02:25 PM
3

Soooo, they are mad that they succeeded at being a man, getting that education and that career and that money. But they failed at getting a good woman who isn't incompetent, useless around the house, emotionally unavailable, sexually boring, "just another child to take care of", lazy, dad mom bod, do nothing to help with the kids, blah blah blah. So, they don't realize they are a butch lesbian, who didn't find a good woman and instead married another man. Career women married to men, need to get…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 10:17 PM
3

It most guaranteed is. Video games aren't even specifically a thing men play anymore. Women can sit around and play Candy Crush on their phones and watch Netflix and never go to the gym or do anything else. That's how they end up being fat and 31 and on Tinder wondering why 10 years later of not going to the gym and they are fat now, wondering why guys used to hit on them all the time at 21 when they were thin. Same thing happens with men if they never hit the gym.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 10:04 PM
0

Somehow, I still think we are discussion two different topics. There is a very specific societal idea, I think we (this subreddit, redpill, mgtow, deadbedrooms etc,) all decided on is that marriage is no longer a required step in life. When Parents, friends, neighbors, coworkers say a man should get married/ have a family, it's the right thing to do, one can reply "haven't you heard its not anymore, its actually very risky, unnecessary, and potentially financially devastating." We decided no man…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 05:00 PM
-1

Now, if you're trying to obtain a girlfriend or whatever, I'd agree that appealing to their interests obviously is necessary. If you're trying to get a job, then you want to appeal to your potential employer's interests. However, if you're just living your life, I'm not sure why you'd want to base your behavior on what others consider important, unless you share in that assessment... If you're just living your life, then you can do whatever you want. Just like you said. But like you said if your…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 03:07 PM
1

I'll agree with you, any man can have any hobby he wants. They can have any hobby that has any adjective associated to it. Fun, exciting, lazy or boring. What I don't get is that you are arguing that "it's ridiculous to suggest being not "lazy and boring" or have a wide range of interesting hobbies because who cares what women think, because no one actually thinks its worth dating/marrying women, because they will leave anyway and take half your stuff. So, don't suggest things that men should do…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 07:17 AM
1

We all agree that that woman is stupid, she left a guy who offered marriage to her at 28 to fuck European dudes and was harshly informed she is much closer to the wall than she apparently understood. Oops she wants her man back. He's like "cool" "nope, I good" But, like you said "She was never attracted to him to begin with. Her plan was to drain him of resources, then dip. She was too dumb to see her plan through." I agree she probably didn't like him and saw him a beta bux guy, then got that i…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 06:22 AM
6

Ha! I guess I'm thinking of the ones in the grocery store. Like if ones been sitting there for a week and a whole batch of new ones arrived.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 04:39 AM
16

A piece of USDA Prime meat, is only as good as it is fresh. People are always going to pick the newer ones even if both were rated Prime.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 04:26 AM
31

crack head hookers That was my favorite part, it takes a double take, "wait you just said you are having a hard time being better than crackhead hookers?" Are you a retired PCP hooker? Like how much lower can you go??
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 04:23 AM
7

She said the name of the movie in the movie!!! (She used the name of the sub in her bitching!!! Yeah!!!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 04:21 AM
-2

This guy above posted this top level comment (to which my comments are in regards too) I don't know I'm kind of on the fence about this one. Yeah she's a fucking cunt and is getting what she deserved, and kudos to him for not taking her back. But I gotta wonder if he didn't have at least a bit of a contributing factor in this and here's why: He was content with spending every night at home watching Netflix or playing video games Some women out there, regardless of how good the man is, just aren'…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 04:07 AM
-5

That's exactly what women say, to explain away why they can sit around all day and watch reality tv, can't cook, are fat and lazy, so they don't clean or exercise (cause its too much work), have no real hobbies or interests or knowledge, so they can't hold an interesting conversation. They are lazy and boring. Then they ask "where are all the good men". If you follow r/theredpill, the whole idea is about being an awesome man, work out, get fit, learn skills, get a good career, take care of yours…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/19 03:29 AM
15

But Raphael doesn't like old 40 year old women, so he's not going to marry you. So, pick one or the other lady.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 07:40 PM
1

Lazy isn't sitting at home playing video games after work. Nobody has a problem with that, that's just relaxing. Someone who "only" plays video games and watches netflix is lazy and boring. Edit: Just want to add "Candy Crush counts a video game." So, when a girl is sitting on her couch playing candy crush on her phone watching Netflix on her TV, and doesn't want to clean or go make dinner or go to the gym tonight, I'm going to view her as lazy, too. The idea implies, they are first physically l…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 07:34 PM
1

Ha, nope didn't get it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 06:59 PM
6

Since when do we trust what women say? I was teaching Krav Maga on top of working fifty hours a week and finishing a master's degree and my ex wife believed and still claims that I was sitting around watching Netflix every evening. (Except for four nights a week teaching, one weekend a month getting pummeled and pepper sprayed teaching women's self defense, and two nights a week training for 2-6 hours. Oh, and writing about 40k words a month.) I mentioned this to someone else on the thread: I ag…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 06:56 PM
2

Y THO? Because racing a car along a curvy mountain road with your favorite music blaring is LITERALLY the most 3D, HD, No lag, immersive, high quality texture video game you can play. Everything looks amazing, you can feel the rumble of the car, the gforces, the wind, the lighting effects are insane. Now just apply that to doing anything else.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 06:36 PM
6

Oh definitely, she's dumb. I just personally don't want to sound like a hypocrite when I complain women I meet on dates are vapid, stupid, boring, and lazy women; that have no hobbies, and just like to "netflix and chill", and play on their phones all day. Even if they think going out and partying counts as a hobby.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 06:33 PM
1

I'm introverted, so I'm very familiar with it. I mentioned in my other comment to someone here that she said "he sat around and played video games and watched Netflix all the time." All the time, like he didn't do anything else. Even if he worked hard at his job, if he literally has no interests outside of sitting on his couch after work, he or she is lazy and boring. If someone did something interesting outside their apartment once a month, that's more than NEVER doing anything else except play…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 06:26 PM
3

"getting out", which in most cases refers to clubbing etc. is she 19? Then maybe "Hey, lets 'go out' ", that usually means clubbing or a bar. Anyone else saying "getting out" probably means going outside of the house, not just saying home watching tv and playing video games. I combined lazy and boring into the same type of person. Lazy people are boring and boring people do things that are lazy as a generalization. Some girl might go out every single night and hit the clubs and restaurants and p…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 06:03 PM
2

Supply and Demand...apparently your friend has taken and economics class or two, while all these other women have not. She studied the demand (men: to be attractive, don't just have a vagina) and created a supply to match it (her attractive body, not just having a vagina). Amazing how that works. Fat men always seem to be surprised when women don't find them attractive either.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 05:53 PM
10

Strangely enough, its actually a very interesting perspective hearing from gay, bi, and lesbian people. Rather than "haha, their gaaay, what do they know" Because, their experiences oddly have proven (not disproven) most things "men/women/redpill/not stupid people/wives tales/etc" have said about women, dating, men, relationships, and sex. Gay men like sleep around a lot (cause men do), lesbians have significantly more dead-bedrooms (cause women), many gay men dress well, workout, looks great (c…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 05:45 PM
11

Basic Bitch...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 05:32 PM
6

mature You confused the word mature with the word intelligent. Just because someone matures doesn't mean they are smart. It just means they matured into adults that take things seriously and don't run around playing tag all day. However, even if they attempt to take things seriously, they can easily still be stupid and make dumb decisions, have stupid ideas, and generally lack a good well rounded amount of knowledge. But, because they mistake being mature with being smart, just like you did, the…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 05:31 PM
80

She literally, LITERALLY, had every thing timed up perfectly. Date guys, do whatever, fuck around in early twenties. Meet a marriageable guy in her mid-twenties, then get proposed to by late twenties, and be married right before 30. Then be married to a chill, financially sound, dude forever (or until she decides to go to Europe in her 40's). She done fucked up...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 05:10 PM
10

You know, some guys are introverted and going out drains them. His way of relaxation is playing video-games and netflix, whereas for other guys it's clubbing and hooking-up. Even if your are introverted you skipped like 50,000 other things that aren't just "clubbing and hooking up" Implying someone just like to play video games and netflix isn't implying they are introverted, it is implying they are lazy. You can go outside and go explore other cities, go race cars, go out on a boat, ride a bike…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 05:06 PM
12

When women ovulate, they find muscular, fit, physically attractive men much more attractive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 04:47 PM
6

Per discoloration, those boobs have seen a lot of action what?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 01:55 PM
4

The bottom 80% of women
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 01:05 AM
1

From dumb as a box of rocks. up to Lawyer, is a wiiide range for the intelligence of women. When women think intelligent they start at lawyer, doctor, professor, finance guy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/19 12:46 AM
2

Then? What happened next? Did she agree she’s a dumb bitch? Did she concur and go back to work? Is she still bitching to her husband to go and get her old job level pay? I need to know the response to you talking to her??
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/01/19 12:02 AM
18

This! Tinder is a dick store for them. The same way Tinder is a chick store for hot dudes.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/01/19 11:32 PM
7

My brain hurt after reading that section.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/01/19 01:23 AM
1

I definitely understand, my responses were simply in regards to the context of the post, which was that “pantythot” and how she had ides and opinions that wouldn’t make any sense if she had any sense. I’ve taken the chance to speak with many elderly people and that has given me a very good understanding of time. Essentially when some people think they will be “old” when they are 70 or 80. According to elderly people you stop feeling 20 by the time you hit 40, and you start feeling (physically) o…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/01/19 05:04 PM
1

That’s not the same time. That’s like universe, matter, energy, time shit. The time we’re talking about is looking at damn calender. Children can comprehend it. It’s understanding that time has an effect, things don’t stay the same, and neither does your hot ass.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/01/19 03:01 AM
1

We hear the same songs on the radio over and over again because Clear Channel bought all the radio stations and they suck now.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/01/19 02:58 AM
6

That's a big point of this subreddit, of men/people pointing that out and going "nope, not paying for that"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/01/19 07:09 PM
6

Exactly no repercussions, so no need to learn.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/01/19 07:07 PM
8

It could be that, but overall they just never learned and understood the concept of TIME. Wait, I'm hot now, but I won't be hot later. If I put a bunch of money on a credit card now, I have to pay more money for it later. I should invest in skills and knowledge now, and not just party all the time because I get invited, because later I'll have to work for a living. Since they can't fathom TIME, they get caught off guard at 30 again and again. Like its literally that fable about the ant and the g…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/01/19 06:05 PM
13

Nope. It just means it's the best right now. Like of the music just released, its the best. That doesn't mean it'll be the best forever. So, that doesn't mean cause its the best now it should be your favorite song, your favorite song should be the song you enjoy the most at anytime ever. Oops, we just discovered that women (basic women) don't understand the concept of time. I'm hot now, I'm one of the hottest women now, so I AM and WILL be one of the hottest women, so I deserve the best man etc.…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/01/19 04:29 PM
42

Their favorite song is ALWAYS whatever the popular song is at the time. Never a random song from a singer in the 60's or 90's. Don't have any inner taste or preference. Just vapid emptiness.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/01/19 04:16 PM
27

Start at age 14 like the girl featured in that other post, who got dumped at age 22 when her boyfriend brought up N-counts.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/01/19 04:14 PM
1

Why Are Young People Having So Little Sex? https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/12/the-sex-recession/573949/ Its Happening!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 05:40 AM
2

Most of these people don't understand that when women have sex with men, men are also having sex with women. Either 1 dude is banging all these women over and over or multiple men are. So, if the woman has a high N count, then obviously that's number of dudes that banged her. So, many women are having sex and many men are having sex. So, unless all the guys are banging the same chick, wait no that's it. It generally seems that guys have low N counts over all, but some women have very high n coun…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 04:42 AM
2

13 At 36 that's pretty low. That's literally less than 1 guy a year if she started banging dudes around 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 04:33 AM
7

Yep, you're definitely serious about that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/01/19 04:08 AM
7

Oh, so you were serious.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/01/19 04:07 AM
3

Seriously, are you saying we should be concerned Jewish people are trying to destroy men and women, that's pretty much everyone??? I'm just not getting it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/01/19 04:04 AM
4

Why would you think Jewish people are trying to get women to stop having kids and families?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/01/19 04:02 AM
2

Sapiosexual This matches exactly your experience with the word. Haha https://old.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/5fddwb/what_do_you_think_of_when_you_see_the_term/ I guess I live in an area, where there aren't that many smart people, so somehow one day I found a word online that matched what I was trying to say about what I found hard about dating the women in the area, as in "I get that your attractive, but youre so stupid, its a turn off, so no I don't want to go on a second date. Leading me to f…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 07:27 PM
1

What? Where did you get that women were using it from that? The first guy that used it here, was a guy. I'm a guy and I use it. Its just a big word that means you like smart people. When your smart, stupid people bore you, they are really annoying to be around. Their stupidity is like nails on a chalk board. So, I like smart women, I like attractive women, but I also like smart women. Hence, sapiosexual. However, I don't disagree with you, that if a stupid woman used it in her profile on tinder …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 06:24 PM
3

I tried to do the same thing. Think of a way to word that she was the asshole because she was mad at him for expressing dislike at her apparent N-count. Some guys don't mind an N-count, some do. This guy was one that minded. But the way she worded her question: Is she an asshole for answering his question, then no she's not. But you know, the point of her asking this question on an open internet forum was to get validation that her high n-count was not a valid reason for him to express dislike o…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 06:07 PM
7

Why do you have sooooooo many kids???? I just don't understand, condoms exist, birth control exists, abortion exists. I get women can have sex with tons of guys, its fun, but why, why, why do you have so many kids? She's 20! What?! Why? She's pregnant again? OMG She's not 35 and has 3 kids and was married the whole time and is now divorced for some reason. This lady went out and banged various separate random dudes and "got" pregnant, then did it again! Why would you go near this lady!, its like…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 05:21 PM
1

Oh no. I've never seen that posted before. Ooops.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 03:53 PM
1

Nature Narrator: What we see here is the young female demonstrating the pre-wall attitude in the wild. Later in life, will she be surprised when she isn't getting first dates at City Winery all day every day and wishes someone would at least take her out on a coffee date?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 02:57 PM
1

The way you described it, it seemed like you were commenting that you weren't dating a lot of women due to being the same height/short. I recommended the shorter Hispanic women, because they are of course shorter than the average height of say white women. If you are looking to marry specifically jewish women, I wouldn't say there aren't that many short jewish women. They aren't necessarily known for being tall. However, you are in luck, because it turns out there are ashkenazi jewish Hispanic w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 02:58 AM
5

That's a good analogy! It emphasizes that what they are asking for is an inconvenience, but since its usually financial is hard to quantify the effort they are asking for. But, physically carrying a person that's easy to understand as a burden.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 02:37 AM
1

Hispanic chicks, dude, date hispanic chicks, they're like 5'0". 5'7" is plenty tall for someone 5'0" - 5'2" and many many hispanic chicks are that height. Salma Hayek is 5'2" Learn spanish, watch a few telenovellas and learn to love hispanic food and your in.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 02:14 AM
6

It's still up https://theblog.okcupid.com/
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 02:05 AM
4

sapiosexual means he is attracted to intelligence ...nerd /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/19 11:35 PM
5

Where would you say you are meeting all these women? Bars, clubs, the grocery store. Online, Tinder? Based on your description of yourself (Top 20%), it would be interesting to know where that quality is being recognized by women. Are women just throwing themselves at you as you shop at the store vs are you approaching attractive women in bars and regardless of you spending 10 minutes talking about Nerd stuff they still try to sleep with you vs having a good profile with personal details like jo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/19 11:24 PM
9

Check out OKcupid Publishing. They put out a report and a book once and a while with Dating Statistics found from people using the site. Very interesting results proving many interesting anedoctal things about dating.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/19 10:17 PM
1

Bingo! And this is the real reason why men should rightfully avoid women with a high N-count. What? Did you read my comment? That's not what I said at all. My point was that it doesn't matter to me if a girl has a high N count, or "strings of one bad sex after another", or "not satisfied with one partner" or are a "bad video game". It matters if she's a trashy ho. Literally a "trashy" ho. Like she had sex in an alley way next to a dumpster. That's disgusting. I don't have sex next to dumpsters i…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/19 04:00 PM
14

The idea that a man is somehow supposed to find it acceptable that his wife was getting banged in some back alley somewhere is perhaps the most repulsive thing I have come to see in the past few months. What I find the worst about these stories isn't a high N Count, but banging in some back alley. I wouldn't bang someone in a some back alley. That's disgusting. So, I certainly wouldn't want to date someone goes about doing that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/19 02:47 AM
2

psychotic bitch This type of person is a very different person than just an extremely hypergamic woman. Their entire thing is that their reactions and demands to things are just completely nonsensical and very extreme. They may hold it together for a while and seem normal, but then oops, you didn't do a thing she imagined you would just know to do, and then BAM! Pyschotic bitch bursts out. They are the female equivalent to an angry short-tempered man who is also crazy, but since they can't just …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/19 06:14 PM
13

WTF? This article literally said place women on a pedestal? How about emphasis being equal for a change?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/19 06:08 PM
10

That’s like a tiny percent of women. She probably has a supply of Plan B, and actually uses them instead of having a fucking kid when she’s single!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/01/19 02:04 AM
29

That’s not how vaginas work. Have you seen some of the top porn stars, they have to be having sex many times a week with many different men. Some of them have great looking ones and some don’t. It’s like dicks some people have big dicks and some people have small dicks. Literally there are women who have very little sex and have vaginas that look like that, and there are porn stars that have amazing looking vaginas. The only thing that really busts vagina is having babies, and even then some vag…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/01/19 01:05 AM
1

I’m well aware of the differences between men and women. I was just pointing out how Today now with the internet there is finally some actual anecdotal evidence being pulled together to show proof of what people have been saying for a long time. Back in the day, if you wanted to understand women/men dynamics it was just one person saying something or someone asking a friend or a “he said, she said” thing. Now, that 1000’s of people men and women compiled all there experiences online, so many thi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/19 04:31 PM
8

Highly unlikely, all the things you listed that became acceptable are for or between consenting Adults, which mean they are all legal, but not necessarily socially approved. Anything sexual between adults nd children is highly illegal and socially unapproved, it will be probably never happen to have anything like that become legal let alone socially approved. Pretty much people can do what ever they want between two consenting adults because it’s legal.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/19 04:25 AM
3

Preventative health care is simply about preventative maintenance of your body, the same way you take care of your car. Some men are so “hard” or stubborn they refuse to go see doctors for things that could be resolved early, but choose to just “walk it off”. Every one of those simple things becomes some major problem that they then definitely have to go to the hospital for. You think getting an annual physical is common sense. Some men think it’s stupid, a waste of time, and “they feel fine”. T…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/19 05:35 AM
7

Passing shit tests is essentially proving you are a man and not a woman. Proving you are a man is attractive to women and that leads to sex. What exactly is a "man" in this case, it is being a rock, not a wishy washy person that does or says random shit. Women have the phrase "he is my rock." No man has ever said about a woman "she is my rock" maybe she is my world, she my base, she keeps me grounded but not "a rock." Being a rock is essentially described as holding frame. Women have an insane a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/01/19 03:07 AM
3

Are you constantly being raped by women? ...Cause otherwise you are choosing your sexual partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/19 02:11 AM
1

I can’t understand how this thought process has become a thing. “A certain type of woman is so annoying I’d rather be a plumber.” What plumber is going, the guys I work with are the worst. I’m not considering changing companies, I’m going to change my entire career to an entire new industry. I gets all women aren’t the same and all men aren’t the same. But what type of woman is so annoying to chase men nerdy computer IT guys, once a super men oriented field, out of being in IT. Why aren’t femini…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/01/19 01:41 AM
8

Same reason people considered guys with 70 hours of tattoos back in the day to be outlaws or bikers or gangsters. It's not something people normally used to do on their bodies. Now however, tattoos are becoming more common place. Hell, there are now even face tattoos. That was the last bastion of someone looking like a complete retard, but nope its a thing now. But, what it really does it puts you in a box, when it comes to dating. Most men don't have many tattoos and aren't looking for women wh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/01/19 04:23 AM
37

It is soooo funny, how much empirical evidence there is out there, that women are doing exactly what people generally say they do. Now, that people are compiling it online. Posting “I’m not down for hookups”, then guys after guy after guy is like “Yeah, I matched and banged women with that in their profile” I’m all for gender equality, but when you approach it scientifically, evidence is evidence and it becomes pretty apparent women do and say completely different things, over and over again. Wh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/19 03:49 PM
18

I don’t think I will ever understand why single mums have children? You're 25, WHY did you have a kid when you don't have to???
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/12/18 06:23 AM
2

It certainly applies to the concept that while the salaries may not be the same, the work effort required can certainly be very different between jobs in the same office. Women do gravitate towards less strenuous HR positions, rather than challenging sales positions.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/18 11:37 PM
3

How are they getting six-figures, those sound like 40-80k jobs at least unless, the one person is the Head of HR, the rest of HR shouldn't be making six figures or you live somewhere like NYC or SF.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/18 11:16 PM
1

I mean, that’s not really what I meant but it certainly reflects most of the women posted about on this sub. Carols
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/12/18 11:04 PM
1

I meant it as the end result of human evolution. It was already the end result of our instinctual mating strategy. It already happened thousands of years ago, when we lived in tribes of 50 to 80. That's where that mating strategy works. The point is the mating strategy that "feels" right because it's instinctual doesn't work anymore because society is a different place, now thousands of years later and billions of people later. It's like dogs who live inside and bark like crazy every time they h…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/12/18 09:33 PM
1

Your exactly right about how this all is today. We all know the simple end result version of the ruthless resource and fertility seeker. Small tribes of 50 to 80 people. Everyone men and women chip in to help the tribe. There are successful attractive Chad hunter/ruler men, all the women try to get pregnant by them. The other 80% men try to get some of the women pregnant, sometimes it happens. Then the whole tribe helps out all the pregnant women and helps take care of the kids. The women might …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/12/18 05:01 PM
1

Yeah, that's not what dowry was for. A dowry is the transfer of parental property to a daughter at her marriage (i.e. 'inter vivos') rather than at the owner's death (mortis causa).[1] A dowry establishes a type of conjugal fund, the nature of which may vary widely. This fund may provide an element of financial security in widowhood or against a negligent husband, and may eventually go to provide for her children.[1] Dowries may also go toward establishing a marital household, and therefore migh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 10:31 PM
2

Yes it was very hard, plus rancher guy doesn't have time for that. Clearly don't understand how hard living was backing the day. Look it up sometime, watch a movie about the Oregon trail, etc.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 09:37 PM
2

What? Of course an 80 year old can marry an 18 year old. They can do it today. 80 year olds also aren't running farms or households, they are basically teenagers with no responsibility that are going to die soon. Sure, your land could pass to her kids, or you could slowly kill off her kids in farming accidents, until all that's left are your kids and her. It's the old west anything can happen out there. The point was that older widowed women with kids had value because men needed women with skil…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 05:05 PM
2

See that's just it. They didn't find a single, no kids, hot cuck provider. They were willing to marry average, rugged, worn farmers and ranchers and guys with kids. Some back in the day guy running his farm or ranch has a couple of kids. His wife dies from disease. He's busy running his ranch, can't be dealing with kids and cooking all day. Needs another wife. A woman met a guy in town got married had a couple of kids, then husband died. Now shes surviving working at the country store. Rancher g…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 04:29 PM
2

Spinsters were always a thing. 'an unmarried woman, typically an older woman beyond the usual age for marriage.'
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 02:32 PM
1

OMG...You dumb bitch
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 04:36 AM
1

Personally, I don’t see this as a woman problem—they clearly built it as a team, so they should take the responsibility for failing as a team too. They both lacked discipline
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/12/18 03:33 PM
2

Those states don't respect the law. You should be able to enforce simple well worded contracts. Simple, in those states don't get married, just sign a contract establishing a partnership with any clauses and requirements. Then get "gay partnershiped" to your heterosexual wife. Boom, no bullshit marriage laws to comply with.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/12/18 02:15 AM
2

Right, but I only mention widow, not divorced. Some annoying stupid woman, who got her man to divorce her, isn't the same as a widow. I'm saying the only reason society respects single moms today, is the hard work of single moms in the past, I'm talking like last 300 years. Divorce wasn't really a thing until the 70's. So, there weren't lots of single moms that were divorced, just widows. So, these thot single moms are acting like men are disrespecting them "for being single moms," but they woul…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 09:22 PM
3

Every person who has ever had a crocodile clamp down on his head is guilty of this flawed thinking. Some perfectly responsible person took a trip to Cambodia, took a river boat trip, then the boat sank, they ended up in the water and a crocodile swam over and clamped down on their head. This kind of thinking is what makes women start getting defensive about being single mothers. Like "ohhh what's wrong with being a single mother, they're strong and good people, they are raising their children de…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 08:03 PM
1

Stupid is as stupid does. Woman acted as a multiplier of stupidity here, not as a cause of stupidity.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 07:27 PM
13

If "men's redpill" could be boiled down to one saying it's "you lack discipline." Women lack discipline and men lack discipline, combined you get this posted story. "Men's redpill" simply tells you as a man you need to learn discipline because no one else in the relationship is going to. Then when you learned discipline, enforce it in the relationship, you are now the gaurdian of the undisciplined. But you can't blame other people (women) for being undisciplined if you arent disciplined either.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 07:21 PM
4

This!, a big problem in America is there isn't one big federal marriage law system. There are fifty different fucked up ones. Netherlands fixed it at a federal level.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 06:47 PM
2

See in the Netherlands the prenups are iron clad. They have better lawyers and judges. We are behind the times in America and until "the system" catches up to where we are, getting married is a very risky thing to do.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 06:44 PM
3

The OP, bothered to post here, his badly written post on r/law, asked here why people think noone there bothered to reply. I mentioned because it was badly written lawyers on r/law probably dismissed it because of that rather than it being theoretically a good question. Bringing "incels" etc into the question further brought into question it's validity as a question worth answering r/law. People ask actual complicated law questions there. Whose gonna bother to answer his post. I didn't want to j…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 06:35 PM
3

Exactly! I left that error in there to see if the OP would correct it, but they didn't. You did, so "grammar +1" to you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 02:16 PM
3

If there is a breach of contract, the one who is the faithful party would be entitled to relief and compensation - but that's not what is happening. The one doing the breach (if the woman) gets the compensation, which is the opposite of ordinary contract law. Right, like I said, it's not that kind of contract, there are not stipulations regarding that. However, you can add additional contracts with actual rules and clauses. Also, marriage is a lie and no one should ever get married, because neit…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 04:14 AM
5

Marriage is a contract, however in relation to your stipulations, those are not included in the contract. You cannot add them to the contract either. However, you can add additional agreements to the main marriage contract. Because you never saw it actually in action. Correct, I've never seen a priest, God, or anyone enforce a religious marriage anymore than a secular marriage. No one hit by a lighting bolt, plague, or turned to salt. I have, however, seen judges put Garnishments on mens wages t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 03:24 AM
3

You need better lawyers.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 03:12 AM
13

It is not even a contract, which many claim it is (where's the "wife slept with another man, breach of contract, pay ME the innocent husband" part?) Those type of claims can be in a Prenuptial Agreement written and signed before the nuptuals. This is even a contract. Holy Matrimony (as you describe it) is also as shitty as "marriage" is because, the person who is supposed to enforce Holy Matrimony, God, doesn't really do any better a job enforcing any of his rules than a secular government does.…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 03:01 AM
-4

You don't ask questions good, is probably the reason why you didn't get a good response from r/Law. Also if you're posting to r/Law, you should probably use capital letters more often, just a thought. They are probably sticklers about the letter of the law.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 02:59 AM
22

Boooooo
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 02:07 AM
27

You can't understand the context of the profile without the PHOTO! Common We need the photo!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 02:03 AM
12

That's pretty tall for a woman, so you got that going for you. "Real men are 6ft tall" /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/12/18 07:37 PM
6

This is the funniest thing, women are like "No men under 6 feet" Then they marry a guy who is 6'7" when they're just 5'2" . Does she think all her son's are magically going to be over 6 feet too, so that women will want to date them? Not gauranteed! She just ruined this guy's Gene pool, she just averaged out this dude's 6'7" height with her shortness . All her kids could just be 5'9" or shorter. Gotta go for 5'8" women or above to keep the tall Genes going in the family.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/12/18 07:33 PM
27

sassy or not sassy delusional is the common denominator She is asking some random guy to date her and pay for stuff and take care of someone elses kid, for 18 plus years; what does that guy get in relationship value, that any non pregnant or with no kids woman can give. This is how very ugly guys used to get not ugly women. Back in the day attractive women needed support that ended up being pregnant or had kids and some random ugly guy could support her and her kids and she settled for that guy.…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/12/18 02:26 PM
10

As soon as I saw 'non religious', I was like "Why is she even pregnant?" I always think these type of young women are from lower class religious areas, that have convinced them they cant gave abortions. So, now they are pregnant, but also need a man because "reasons."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/12/18 02:25 PM
1

No, it was an Instagib Match /s Also, just to clarify, I made sure to make it a mountain lion, not a lion. They are smaller. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BqNCK5kNsmc/maxresdefault.jpg
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/12/18 06:44 PM
2

lol no. Still no. If you were athletic you could fight off a mountain lion. Most tall people are gumpy and have little to no athleticism Are you arguing with genetic instinct? Women like tall men, arguably, tall athletic men. If given a choice, women would choose the tall athletic man over the tall "gumpy" man. The whole point placing the women and men in a tribe in the woods, was to illustrate what happens. All the short non athletic men tried to fight the mountain lion and it killed them, then…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/12/18 06:29 PM
4

It made sense way back when mountain lions were constantly attacking tribes living in the woods. If you were big, you could fight off the mountain lion. So, they find it attractive. Same with men finding young fertile women attractive, better chance of your kid surviving, while living out in the woods in a tribe with no hospital. Except, finding young fertile women attractive, is still relevant today, because people still have children. So, any young attractive smart woman would replace finding …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/12/18 06:14 PM
12

I didn't even realize she was 5'10'' because she is overweight, yet not voluptuous. I thought she was like 5'6/7". The second she said 5'10", I was like "Yep, that's why your single, you out grew your dating pool. A "taller" guy to her is a "tall" guy to like every other woman and women really like "tall guys" like theyre hot chicks of something. So, her being only average looking and 5'10", there aren't a lot of 5'11" or 6' tall guys out there looking to date an average looking women, because e…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/12/18 05:16 PM
13

not aroused seeing women together. Well, we officially have a person who legitimately doesn’t like three ways. That guy from Office Space is going to be disappointed./s In that case, carry on preferring bisexuals not post where you online date. I believe on some online sites you can turn that off, and only show girls that only date guys.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/12/18 02:59 PM
22

Someone doesn’t like three ways.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/12/18 02:14 PM
28

The movie is set in the future where everyone on earth is now an idiot and talk “bad English”. The plot is a that guy from today get frozen and reawakens in that future. When he talks in normal “good English” people make fun of him.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/12/18 10:36 PM
29

He called himself that after he got successful and start on a national prime time sitcom
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/12/18 03:55 PM
100

Cultural Appropriation
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/12/18 03:52 PM
72

That’s straight out of the movie idiocracy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/12/18 03:49 PM
28

The chick was from work.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/12/18 09:44 PM
15

She's still a hypocrite. People don't like hypocrites.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/12/18 09:28 PM
33

On a side note, fucking a girl in the same apartment complex is genius. He can keep her close enough to bang, but far enough away that he doesn’t have to put up with her bullshit. ?? Did you read the story? He's not banging the old lady from upstairs.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/12/18 09:26 PM
1

"Enough to be disgusted?" Seems like it questions if you are disgusted by her, more than it being a judgment that her personality just seems shitty. I'm getting the sense you mean she seems like she has a disgusting personality, like as a person she seems disgusting. Not like she is physically disgusting or icky or something like that.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 06:18 AM
1

A Good Woman is a man. Someone needs to start a "Man Up" foundation for women. Do you want to the best WoMan you can be, then "Man Up!" Enjoy the benefits of being consistent, logical, cooperative, etc. Work out, look good, be healthy. Etc Etc.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 05:49 AM
1

old, fat or in general ugly SJWs. Thing is this is by far the majority. The majority of women are old, fat and in general ugly? Damn, women fucked up. There are going to be a lot of lonely people in the future.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 05:45 AM
2

Getting rid of the draft, severely stopped the random effect of culling men. Now only poor or super alpha fighting men get into wars. Weak men that weren't accepted into the military were probably to weak to be the physically strongest men anyway.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 05:38 AM
3

We've been in at least two Wars constantly for the last 17 years now. That sounds like the blue pill understanding of war. Those are just little skirmishes that noone is dedicating enough resources to officially win. They might be Wars for the people of Iraq and Afghanistan, but not for the US. A full on war, means millions of people have to fight to win, and will likely die, the countries that are fighting decide that winner takes all and you invest everything you have to win. The US isn't even…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 05:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter