TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

womblefish Archive

View 6 posts and 480 comments by womblefish on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you're in Auckland I might be able to recommend a guy. Pm me.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 02:06 PM
39

The most ridiculous thing about this proposed law is how out of touch the woman proposing it is. She thinks threatening to force men to pay $10,000 if they get their partner pregnant is going to terrify and shock them! Has she never heard of Child Support? Where men are already forced to pay 25% or more of their income for 18 years if their partner gets pregnant? The average US wage is about $52k. 25% of that over 18 years is $234,000. And she thinks $10k is a horrible oppression that will terri…
/r/MensRights06/10/21 01:28 PM
6

There was a thread in 2X the other day that I considered posting here. It was about men's role in Feminism. The comments were about a 70%/30% split. 70% were of the opinion that Feminism was for women only and men should not be involved, and Feminsm should only do things that benefit women. 30% were of the opinion that Feminism should benefit women only, but that they should lie to men and tell them it benefits men too, so that men will help the cause. What was fascinating, but not particularly …
/r/MensRights28/07/21 01:04 AM
22

Oh god, not this bullshit again. For casual readers here's the short explanation. 1) A couple separate. 2) The court orders him to pay her so much money that he can't afford to survive on what he has left. 3) He is then required to take on additional hours at work, or a second job just to have enough money to support himself. 4) Because this half-arsed crap that calls itself 'research' sees his taxable income has gone up, it declares that he is "richer". The reality is that he is now working 70 …
/r/MensRights23/07/21 03:06 AM
2

Pretty much all Feminist Theory has a certain similarly to Ancient Greek Philosophy, but without the critique. It's just a bunch of people (women) sitting around coming up with an idea, and if it sounds about right, then the issue is settled. No experimentation, no testing of theories, no looking for examples that disprove a theory. And just as Aristotle declared that heavy objects fall faster, they make declarations that have no supporting evidence except gut feeling. I've noticed that a lot of…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 04:44 AM
2

Their main recommendation is more kindergarten teachers, higher pay for kindergarten teachers, and more funding for kindergartens. This report was written by Claire Read for Save the Children UK. We extend huge thanks to Gemma Moss and Liz Washbrook – who conducted the thorough and groundbreaking study on which this report is based and advised us throughout the drafting process. We also thank Naomi Eisenstadt, Rebecca Allen and Eunice Lumsden for their comments during writing, Isn't it an odd co…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:42 AM
1

If it was just a person yah sure you could do that and maybe end up alone in the processes You sound like someone who would stay in an abusive relationship because they're scared of being alone. Seriously, are you going to let your partner repeatedly insult and demean you because you're scared that standing up to them might upset them? That's not a healthy relationship. But what you would have done in a work environment where your superiors were women ? Would you stop a meeting and yell to them …
/r/MensRights23/04/21 10:46 AM
1

Be a MAN! attack - I tried to debate and argue this one to no avail. So far ignoring it was the best course of action. Ignoring it means they can feel free to use it again. And debating it is too soft a response. if they want you to act like a MAN, then act like a MAN. But the surprise for them is a MAN isn't subservient and obedient, and MAN does what he wants and doesn't take shit from anyone. I've found confronting it head on with and aggressive response shuts it down permanently. A "MANs" re…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 03:59 AM
2

Unfortunately it probably does. There are studies that show female police officers are much more likely to use firearms, and lethal force. They don't have to strength to subdue suspects, so they just kill them.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 10:43 AM
6

Cattiest response.... Woman: I don't like your new beard Man: I don't like yours much either.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 08:30 AM
6

"Equity" would be the same percentage of boys and girls failing. This is just plain discrimination. Men have on average 75% more upper body strength by women. Even rounding up, a fair test for the boys would have been 20 push ups and a 30 second plank. While PE may not seem like an important subject to many, a poor grade can have negative consequences long term, particularly if you want to go into fields like sport science, or the military. You've said this is a private school, implying that you…
/r/MensRights15/02/21 11:25 PM
15

I don't think you mentioned before that she already had 3 kids. No wonder she's lost the plot, she thought you were going to be her meal ticket for life. It's not a major surprise that she's pulling out all the stops, manipulation, lying about a baby etc, to try and get you to stay. Seriously, she sounds toxic. I'm gonna guess she's come up with no evidence of her 'pregnancy'. You should cut off all contact with her, don't reply, she's just gonna mess with your head and make you feel bad. She al…
/r/MensRights13/02/21 01:51 AM
1

Which is why he should buy one, write something on it, take a photo, and send it too her by overnight signed courier. Once it arrives (he should be able to tell when it was signed for online) he should give her 6 hours to take the test and send him a photo of her holding the positive test. If the photo she sends back isn't the exact same test with his handwriting on it, that he sent her, it's fake.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 08:02 PM
8

As others have said, an ultrasound at 12 weeks is standard. Every pregnant woman has one. It's a way to check for major birth defects and health issues like downs syndrome. By the timeline she has given you she should have had her 12 week ultrasound by now. When you have an ultrasound they will offer you a video copy of the scan (on DVD) for a small price. But they always give away a couple of printed out pictures from the scan for free, to take home. A pregnant woman will always treasure these,…
/r/MensRights12/02/21 03:33 AM
10

Well there was forcing all boys 6 year old or over to join Hitler Youth. Then sending teenage boys on suicide missions, and executing them if they refused.. https://www.history.com/.amp/news/how-the-hitler-youth-turned-a-generation-of-kids-into-nazis They sent 15 year old boys into combat with practically no training. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_use_of_children_in_World_War_II I can't find other sources right now. But in the final defense of Germany, boys as young as 14, or possibly…
/r/MensRights26/01/21 08:45 PM
10

One of the techniques that feminists use is they compartmentalize issues, so that they can disregard areas where men are disadvantaged and only highlight areas where women are disadvantaged. Eg Only look at women's representation in the trades, but completely ignore men's representation in nursing or teaching. I recall one feminist study that looked at housework that deliberately used the definition of "work done inside the house". By doing so they were able to exclude traditionally male jobs ar…
/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:35 AM
2

Women are the cause of most illnesses. The fact that the majority of people in healthcare are female verifies this. Your logic is stupid.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 12:27 AM
5

There's this social idea that men are supposed to be stoic and just take abuse that is thrown at them. Likewise there's a social expectation that men are supposed to act 'like a gentleman' and fight fair. There's no social expectation for women to be stoic, or fight fair. The reality is that a lot of women know this, and use it to their advantage. So some women will use the most underhanded despicable tactics to hurt men they think have wronged them in some way. And they assume that the men will…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 03:33 AM
1

You have my sympathies. Unfortunately I've been in a very similar situation, but I wasn't smart enough to figure out what was going on. When I was 15 our history class studied the Israel/Palestine in the 20th century. Although I generally did quite well in history, I got very low marks during that half of the year. I was very confused, I did what I thought was some of my best work, but consistently got C's. Meanwhile other students who were mediocre at best we're getting B's and even A's. It was…
/r/MensRights08/09/20 03:06 PM
17

The issue is that the fields of psychology, counselling, and psychiatry have become very female dominated. Thus female behaviour and attitudes have become defined as 'normal'. Men who exhibit normal male behaviour are treated as faulty women. These fields are largely unable to help men, because they don't even understand men anymore. In some ways it's a reversal of the situation a hundred years ago, where the medical profession was male dominated, emotional women were treated for 'hysteria'. Now…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 08:54 PM
127

In the past millenia we've gone from horse drawn wagons to landing on the moon, from witchcraft and prayers to mass immunization and eradicating most plagues, from women dying in childbirth and routine famines to free health care (most places) and supermarkets, from feudal servitude to global democracy and human rights. Does this person really think they could have done better...
/r/MensRights16/06/20 12:31 AM
3

I remember sitting in meditation with my female lawyer, my ex, her female lawyer and the female meditator...., I was the only man in the room with 4 women. There was a brief surreal moment as I sat there watching 4 women deciding when I might get to see my kids and what my role as a father would be in their lives. OP.. Women can moan about things like the way men sit on a bus or the imaginary pink tax as much as they like, it's fucking trivial bullshit compared to being cut out of your children'…
/r/MensRights03/06/20 10:42 AM
2

Damn, "Hello, Lovely Gentlemen" is how I'm gonna greet all my mates from now on, it's charming and funny as fuck!
/r/MensRights30/04/20 09:36 PM
2

This is just women trying to get jobs reserved for women. No different than feminists demanding seats on company boards be reserved for women only. If a man or a small women can both do the job convincingly why does it matter who does it? They also ignore that stuntwomen with their smaller body size, have preferencial hiring when they need someone to double for a child or young adult.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:31 AM
2

If you literally can't tell the difference between a woman or a man doing the same job, why should it even matter who you choose?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:27 AM
9

I actually disagree. I doubt artificial wombs would bring about any significant benefit to men, and their existence may actually be used to make men's lives worse.. ​ First of all, one of the common threads that runs through the majority of men's issues is the Apex Fallacy. Basically Feminists look at the top 500 CEOs and see that 93% are men, and then claim that men have it great. But they completely ignore that the majority of men are not CEOs. They look at the highest payed sports players and…
/r/MensRights19/03/20 01:03 PM
21

It's not just young women. As a young guy I was taught by school, and the media, that men and women were basically the same. But also the contradictory message that women were delicate flowers that needed to be protected. Without any sisters growing up, I had no real experience to contradict those messages. I can remember being at a party when I was about 17. A bunch of us guys were messing around arm wrestling. I was always one of the smallest guys at that age, I wasn't winning much, but I wasn…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 12:24 AM
1

Has everyone forgotten about the picture of the black hole already. Where 1 woman was given credit for the work of an entire team of mostly men. If anything, we're in an ear of women getting credit for men's work.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:39 PM
2

Set up a fake email account and send an anonymous complaint with a fake name to your local police station. Something along the lines of "I'm concerned, a student at the school has confided in me that the boys changing room has a glass door, and 'a certain teacher' has repeatedly been seen leering through the glass and watching the boys change..He says he''s worried and it has been making him and other students feel uncomfortable. "
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:31 PM
1

www.avoiceformen.com Its one of the top articles. I'm not sure if I'm allowed to post a direct link to the article.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 03:15 AM
1

The videos the police seized from the boys phones has been leaked online. It's pretty clear she's a willing participant. Most likely she only admitted she was lying because the police already had proof. A Voice For Men has an article about it, including links to the 4chan thread with the leaked videos..
/r/MensRights16/08/19 02:51 AM
3

It's a damn shame to see an iconic publication die. The sad thing is that it could have been saved. While it is true that the Internet has resulted in easy access to porn, that makes a lot of the magazines original purpose irrelevant, the brand still had value. Playboy as a brand projected an image of naughty sex fun, combined with class and wealth. The biggest market for Playboy branded merchandise wasn't dirty old men, it was young women, who bought things like Playboy Bunny T-shirts and car s…
/r/MensRights03/08/19 11:45 PM
2

First of all, what country, state or city are you in.??? Laws and the support available will vary depending on your location.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 11:36 PM
3

transit Well there's that time Swedish feminists decided to prioritise sweeping snow off footpaths rather than roads, because men drive to work, and women are more likely to walk... And then because the roads were covered in snow, Ambulances and other essential services couldn't reach people in need.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 07:02 PM
11

Episode 9 will be mediocre. Lots of flashy effects, but no substance. No one cares about the characters that are left, and the story has nowhere interesting to go.. But they will market the hell out of it, abd try to hide how much they actually spend. This movie has to work for them at all costs. It will make about the same as the Last Jedi, which Disney will claim means it's an Amazing success. (But if you include marketing costs it will barely scrape even). The franchise is dying, but they'll …
/r/MensRights09/07/18 01:50 AM
1

Women are much more likely to appeal to authority for support and protection. Therefore even if they both experienced the same levels of harassment, I would expect women's reporting levels to be much higher than men's.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 05:00 PM
2

I can recall one incident of a male teacher sending a 17 year old girl to the office for a dress code violation. She was wearing skin tight jeans which were not allowed. When she got to the office her defense was "How would he know how tight my jeans are, unless he was staring at my ass?" She continued to tell anyone that would listen that he was a filthy pervert for the rest of the year.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:23 PM
5

From what I recall of my school years, girls would do things like adjust the hem of their uniform skirts to make them shorter. Or simpler still was to pull up the waist of their skirt then roll the top of the skirt down to where the waist should be.. Another common one was to deliberately wear a uniform that's too small for you, effectively making it skin tight. For a while there was also a brief trend of girls deliberately walking in the rain. White blouses become translucent and stick to the s…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 09:41 AM
0

In a democracy, where votes count, overestimating your numbers will make politicians pay more attention to you, get you more funding (eg medical funding). Likewise advertisers are more likely to pander to you, media will be made to appeal to you.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:36 PM
1

Community Member of the Month: January 2018 Name: Maya O’Boyle Pronouns: She, Her, Hers Major: Russian, Eastern European and Eurasian Studies (REEES) I Lol'ed.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 02:10 PM
17

Sigourney Weaver didn't play a marine in Alien, in fact there were no marines in Alien. Ripley (Weaver's character) was just a mid level officer on a civilian ore freighter. And the 70's was basically the peak of 2nd wave feminism. It's the era of "I am woman hear me roar" (1971). Alien which came out in 1979 was at the tail end of that era. The reason no one had a problem with Ripley when Alien came out, was that she was sensible, capable, and focused on trying to survive. But mostly because sh…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:13 PM
6

I've met a few women in various trades, electricians, plumbers, builders, welders etc. From what I've seen, 95% of them leave the trade within a couple of years after qualifying and go into a related field like sales, or admin. A lot of them find they simply don't have the physical endurance to do the work year after year, especially once they get past their mid 20's. And others seem to be more motivated by wanting to prove that they can do a 'mans job', and once they actually get the job they r…
/r/MensRights31/12/16 02:53 AM
7

Your own examples contradict the point you're trying to make. Marie Curie's Nobel prize shows that women who were motivated and interested in the sciences were able to take part in scientific research from at least the 1900's onwards. Yet despite the field clearly being open to women for over a century, women still make up a tiny fraction of Nobel prize winners. The presence of female programmers on the the Apollo project clearly demonstrates that people in authority were more than willing to gi…
/r/MensRights31/12/16 02:25 AM
6

It would be done by pushing news stories on shows like 60 minutes. Something like "Little Tommy was conceived by IVF, but his mother became sick and couldn't work, and they had to go on welfare and can barely afford rent. Little Tommy can't even afford books for school, so he reached out to his biological father for help. His biological father is a multi-millionaire real-estate developer who owns 200 properties across the state. Tonight we'll be asking why he refused to help his son!" Or "This m…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 03:16 AM
3

Jim was a driven, vocal, passionate man, who devoted the later part of his life to helping others and protesting injustice. He spent the majority of his time running support groups for parents going through Family Court, and offering legal support as a McKenzie Friend, attending court hearings with people who needed help, but couldn't afford a lawyer. He helped Fathers and Mothers, anyone he thought was being treated unfairly by the court. I can honestly say I wouldn't have my daughter in my lif…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 12:29 PM
8

Female teachers are expected to be teachers. Male teachers are expected to be teachers, role models for boys, to teach girls how to interact with men, and take on the role of a pseudo-father for children whose mothers have forced their real father out of their lives. Honestly this talk of male teachers being expected to act as father figures to fatherless children sickens me. Not only are higher and unfair expectations being placed on male teachers, but they're also deliberately attempting to us…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 12:49 PM
9

In 2006 the Australian government actually passed a Shared Parenting Law, giving both parents equal rights to see their children after a separation. It only lasted a couple of years. When the Green Party got into government in 2011 one of the first things they did was to pass an amendment bill that reversed the shared parenting changes made in 2006 The Green’s member, Rachel Siewert said,“The Greens have consistently opposed the equal shared parenting responsibility legislation” brought into law…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:08 AM
1

I understand that. But firstly, I don't want to waste time on a /v/ that's been set up as a false flag operation. We get trolls and here all the time, and it's exactly the sort of thing they would love to do. If the mods here get shadow banned there's no way to be sure who's actually controlling a /v/. Sure, eventually people would figure it out and move on, but the wasted time and damage to the community would be significant. Secondly, call me sentimental, but I kind of like the community here.…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:26 PM
1

Can the mods tell us if they have an official fall back position if /r/mensrights gets banned tomorrow? Say I log in tomorrow, and /r/mensrights is gone, and all the mods have been shadowbanned... Where do we go? A lot of people are saying voat.co I've noticed that the v/mensrights (on voat) appears to be active, but the mod has the same username as a mod of /r/SubredditDrama , /r/trashy , /r/TrollYChromosome , /r/OneY etc. Is /v/mensrights under the control of the same people who control r/mens…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:23 AM
2

Since my eldest started school they have had 4 different female teachers. Through parent teacher evenings and school trips I have had the opportunity to talk to each of them, 1 on 1, for about an hour or so total. So far, every single one of them, 4 out of 4, has without prompting by me (i.e. I never asked them for their opinion or brought up the topic), has expressed an opinion to the effect that 'boys are a problem', 'boys are difficult to teach', 'boys are disruptive', 'boys misbehave all the…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:08 AM
8

It's a business decision intended to "expand the userbase" and make the site more "advertiser friendly". It would appear that the admins have decided that the way to achieve those objectives is to make the site "safer". (aka A SJW witchhunt.) "Expand the userbase" is corporate speak for making the site into something a suburban 30 year old soccer mom would want to visit. That means removing anything that might offend the sensibilities of such a hypothetical user, and increasing the content that …
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:29 PM
2

There are other less 'blatantly illegal' options. e.g. Use the company fuel card to fill up his gas tank once a week, list it as a 'business expense'. Rename his position as Truck Driver / Sales Rep. Give him an 'expense account' that he can use to buy food, just tell him to bring the receipts from the grocery store to show you what he's buying, and "find" some receipts from restaurants or coffee shops each week to show the accountant. Give him a cardboard box with some old files in it. Ask him …
/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:56 PM
1

The idea that 'low pay' is the cause of low numbers of male teachers, is a red herring pushed by teaching unions (predominantly women), women teachers and women's groups. Basically it's a bunch of women rather cynically attempting to use discrimination against men to line their own pockets. i.e. "We heard you were concerned about the gender imbalance in teaching, so we've come up with a solution, give us more money". It's not a bad ploy, because even if they do all get pay rises, and the gender …
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:25 PM
4

His concerns about being railroaded were legitimate. Basically what he's describing sounds like a restraining/protection order. Based on his description she sounds mentally unstable, vindictive, and willing to use 'the system' to hurt him. If they've been in a relationship, she'd knows where he worked, where he went for lunch, where he'd hang out with friends, where he went shopping etc. All she has to do is show up at those places and call the cops, claiming that he's stalking her. Signing that…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 12:32 PM
10

Immediate reinstatement of the Law Commission review of trial and pre-trial processes in sexual assault cases Because they want to use the Law Commission to change the law so that the accused has to "prove consent", ie. To guilty until proven innocent. Better police processes and training to support survivors and pursue justice These are the same people who push the Duluth model. What sort of system do you think they're going to come up with for dealing with rape... Educational programmes for pr…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 12:45 AM
3

It doesn't matter what you said to her, or what she claims you said to her, or what she thought you meant... The only thing the law cares about is whether you're married to her.. If a married woman gets pregnant, the law automatically assumes the husband is the father. Since you use the word "girlfriend", you're not married, therefore this law doesn't affect you. Basically, if she has the baby and claims you are the father, you have to go to court and point out that she was having unprotected se…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 12:12 PM
5

Many years ago I was living in a house with five other people. One night we had a party, we had about 50 guests. I met a young woman, a friend of a friend, we got on very well. We spent most of the evening with her sitting on my lap on the couch in the middle of the lounge, talking, joking around and kissing. She'd just broken up with her boyfriend and it was pretty clear she was putting the past behind her. Towards the end of the evening I said goodnight to everyone, and went to my room, about …
/r/MensRights22/10/14 01:38 AM
2

One of the most infuriating issues with this case is the police publicly saying that no-one had reported the little girl or her mother missing until 2013. Yet the father approached the police in 2008 and 2009, asking them for help to locate his daughter so he could serve the mother with Family Court papers. The police refused to help. This whole story is a horrible tragedy, but it's just another example of a child being placed in danger after the relationship with her father was severed.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 09:50 PM
3

When a government wants to make social changes they have a number of methods of effecting change. One of the most common is as follows.. Step 1: Announce that activity/behaviour 'X' is good for society. Keep repeating it until enough people start believing it. Step 2: Once there is a fair amount of support for Step 1, begin to demand that all citizens engage in activity/behaviour 'X', criticize and demean those that fail to engage in activity 'X'. This sets up an in-group/out-group mentality in …
/r/MensRights20/09/14 11:21 AM
1

The moment my ex mentioned the words "drugs" in one of her affidavits I immediately and voluntarily took a drug test at my own expense and submitted it with my "affidavit in response" seven days later. I didn't wait until she filed a motion to force me to take a drug test. If I'd waited until a motion was passed, and I was forced to take a test, it would've looked like I was reluctant to take the test or stalling for time, and she would have claimed that I'd just stopped taking drugs because I k…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:10 AM
2

Prosecutor: So, you claim you have evidence that you had consensual sex? Defendant: Yes, I have a condom wrapper with her fingerprints on it. Prosecutor: Why on earth would you keep an empty condom wrapper, don't most people throw those in the bin? Defendant: Well I was concerned that she might accuse me of rape.. Prosecutor: ??? You were expecting to be accused of rape?..... What did you do that led you to expect you were going to be accused of rape?
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:16 AM
21

Yes, more women "attempt suicide" however substantially more men actually die from suicide. I used quotes around the term "attempt suicide" because I've seen numerous young women "attempt suicide". One walked into a room full of friends with an empty paracetamol packet, claiming she had just swallowed ten paracetamol pills, "and now I'm going to die".. It was clearly attention seeking behaviour rather than a genuine attempt to kill herself, but never the less, an an ambulance was called, she was…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 10:40 AM
1

That's simply not how male only work places function. I work with a large number of guys of various sizes, ages and shapes. When something needs to be lifted everyone helps. Sure if it's something like boxes the smaller/older guys may take one at a time while the big guys take two, if they're bigger items two small guys may carry one between them while the bigger guys carry one by themselves. No-one expects the big guys to lift more just because they're bigger, and no-one criticizes the smaller …
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:29 AM
21

We can't, and we shouldn't. What you have to take into account is a little bit of history. The MRM in it's current form has been around since the early 70's. Back then being polite and co-operating with feminists was one of the central ideas of the MRM. Surely if we helped them, they' help us, right? But what actually happened was that men's issues were consistently and repeatedly ignored, Men were told that women's issues were more important, more urgent, that we should be quiet, that we should…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:33 AM
2

The job is serving Chinese food. It's a retail position. There are 28 million retail jobs in the USA. If it's ok for these guys to discriminate based on gender it must be ok for everyone else to discriminate, right?
/r/MensRights21/05/14 06:23 PM
1

If you have a look at the /r/againstmensrights drilldown results you'll see that /r/mensrights is 4th on the list. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean agreement.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 07:56 AM
7

There are around 1500 “shelters for battered women” in the US while there are only a handful which provide the same services to men If you're going to mention this to a younger, largely uniformed audience, you should probably mention that men are raised to never hit a woman, while women are not raised to never hit men, in fact in many ways our society glorifies women who assault men (e.g. Bobbit, The View, TV, movies etc). The net result being that men who are assaulted by their partners often r…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 07:32 PM
3

It would be fair to assume that they would receive the same response as a woman with erect nipples currently does. It's a physiological response that can be caused by arousal, but can also have other causes.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:15 AM
2

Over representing the instance of sexual assault, and rape, has two consequences. The first is that it is used to justify increased funding for support services for rape victims and education campaigns. I can understand why that would be desirable, and might lead to the conclusion that it's ok to lie if the result of lying is "good". An ends justifies the means type of attitude. The second consequence is that rape and sexual assault are portrayed as everyday occurrences, that there are rapists w…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:23 AM
2

I'm curious, what do you think of the methodology used in the research that produced those numbers? Do you actually have any idea what the methodology was, how the studies were performed, and the accuracy of the results? Or have you just found something called a "Fact Sheet", and assumed that everything on it must be an indisputable Fact? If you want to know why we're skeptical, feminist groups routinely use incredibly dodgy methodology to produce meaningless numbers. Not too long ago major news…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:07 AM
1

If anything the sub looks more interested in ignoring issues men have deal with today. i.e. It seems to be promoting the idea that you should put on a nice suit, pour yourself a glass of single malt scotch, light a cigar and watch the big game. Then check yourself in the mirror to make sure you look enough like Don Draper to fill the crushing empty void in your soul that makes you cry yourself to sleep each night.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:50 AM
3

From your sidebar... Cars and motorcycles Sports and fitness Guns and tools Barbequing and hunting Women and relationships Beards and grooming Watches and fashion Money and business Alcohol and tobacco Rules: Keep it manly ??? And all your links so far are from Askmen.com You seem to have a very narrow (traditionalist) idea of what "being a man" is. Of your list of topics only 2 out of 18 even mildly interests me, and I'll just check..., and yep, I'm pretty sure I'm a man. I've got no ill will t…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:37 AM
11

$4,020 is the basic cost of raising each child per year as estimated by the Department of Health and Human Services for 2013 The government knows how much it costs to raise a child, they've extensively researched the subject, and the number they've come up with is $335/month. ($4020/12). Even their highest reasonable estimates are $9,440/yr ($786/month for a teenager). There is literally no justification for child support ever being any higher. In fact, when you consider that child support is ro…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 12:06 AM
4

And how does a man opt-out if he's not informed of the pregnancy? How can prove he was not informed of the pregnancy? What's he going to do, show the court the text messages he never got? Print out the emails he was never sent? Play a recording of the conversation he was never part of? The problem with an opt-out system is that there's nothing to stop the mother waiting until the opt-out period has expired, and then informing the father, when he can do nothing about it. And it's damn near imposs…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:51 AM
1

It's possible that the daughter, and her mother did just want to know who her father is. (for certain, not just "I think it's probably this guy"). Just so she could know who her father is and know a little bit about him. They probably never stopped to think about your feelings or how this information would affect you, the level of involvement you want may be more than she/they do. ie. She/They expected a quick "yes, that guy's your dad", exchange a few photos, some family history, put you on the…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:29 AM
5

Most definitely not. I don't outright lie, but I always try evade the question, or imply that I earn about 20%-30% less than I actually do. She has her own income, she was perfectly capable of paying for things herself before we met, I see no reason why I should be under any obligation to pay for things for her that she is perfectly capable of paying for herself. I've broken up with women previously who were unable to control their spending, if someone can't live within a budget, giving them eve…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:50 AM
28

The best place to start would be here
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:07 AM
8

Her parents, devout Christians who supported both her decision to have the child and her decision not to marry Carl, were helping with child care. This seems to be a very common pattern with single mothers, that they are incredibly reliant on their own (married) parents for physical and financial support. Whether it's calling Nana in for babysitting duties or calling Grandad to fix a leaky tap, single mothers seem to be unable to cope on their own in the way the married couple would be. It just …
/r/MensRights24/04/14 06:09 AM
3

but my girlfriend's family has offered to help by paying all my back child support and attorney's fees By "my girlfriend" are you referring to the mother of your child? If that's the case, I'd be very suspicious about what her family want in return... I hear a lot of instances where a guy is asked to sign a piece of paper, only to find out later that he's signed away all legal rights to see his child. If I had my tin-foil hat on, I would guess that it's a co-ordinated plan, by your ex and her fa…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 11:30 PM
2

Well, since your first point of contact is Reddit, the easiest first check would be to click on their username and have a look at their comment history. If it's a brand new account with no history of commenting in /r/MensRights you should probably be a little suspicious. If they have a history of commenting in /r/MensRights but being commonly downvoted into negative numbers, you should probably be suspicious (they're probably a troll). Then again, there are quite a few users who never comment, a…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:49 PM
4

Although /u/AnitaSarcasmtheCUNT was a little abrasive, his concerns are genuine and quite common here. We've had previous incidents of users being doxxed, their employers and families being harassed. In other incidents we've had people trying to find users IP address or google account information. One of our mods had to step down after his employer was contacted and harassed about his activity in this sub. It's the reason why all the mods have anonymous user accounts now. A lot of users are also…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 09:28 PM
1

Sorry, but what's this bullshit? Blue - low quality or low relevancy content (eastern cultures are drastically different from western, and the issues and nuances around gender in these cultures should really be discussed within a different paradigm) And this bullshit? Eastern Culture - Posts about eastern cultures, including the middle east, India, Pakistan, China, etc, where gender norms and identity are drastically different from western (north america, europe, oceania) cultures. Are you imply…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 11:13 AM
8

Looking at all the comments here, I think I've figured out what the purpose of this little checklist is. The vast majority of commenters here seem to be scoring under 30, and are "under/un-privileged" by the criteria of this list. I believe that's intentional, and the creators of this quiz have designed it so that 90%+ of people will be defined as "un-priviledged". While at the same time, as you go through the test you're reminded of all the issues SJW's think are important in making someone pri…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:57 AM
2

Apparently I'm "not privileged at all". (27) Without even going in to how absolutely useless the notion of privilege is for discussing social issues, most of these questions were clearly written by some upper middle class SJW college student, who doesn't even understand the topic they're trying survey. Most of the questions are poorly written and could be interpreted in multiple ways. If I don't know who Sally Mae is, is that because I'm so rich I never needed a student loan, or because I'm so p…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 11:22 PM
18

I've seen/experienced a similar thing in much less dire circumstances.. e.g. The child needs some kind of medical procedure... If it's just the mother present, they ask her, she says yes, they perform the procedure.. If it's just the dad present, they tell him about it, then say "we'll wait while you contact the mother to discuss it". I've also noticed that many medical professionals (particularly female medical professionals) that are discussing a child's health care with both parents, will spe…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:12 PM
23

Funnily enough both issues have a similar root cause. Whether it's cutting up little boys penises, or conscripting teenagers to charge at machine guns, they both rely on the belief that men don't have a right to make decisions about their own bodies, and on the belief that men's bodies (and lives) are disposable and inherently worthless. They're both expressions of male disposability. Opposing one but not the other would be logically inconsistent.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:01 AM
3

The reality is that in the current political environment any financial shortfall caused by the loss of child support, would be made up by the state. i.e. The cost of welfare will go up. The main effects will be that high earning men (sport stars etc) will not have to worry about their partners getting deliberately pregnant for child support. (but most guys aren't millionaire movie stars). As the cost of welfare grows, there will be more public shaming of single mothers. This will be interesting,…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 03:23 AM
8

You're ignoring all the various welfare programs, housing programs and tax breaks specifically targeted to single mothers. When combined with child support they provide enough income to get by without having undertake any form of paid employment. I'm not suggesting it's a great or envious lifestyle. But for many women with minimal education, the income provided by having a child is substantially better than any minimum wage job they'd be qualified for. You'd be disturbed by how many young women …
/r/MensRights05/04/14 03:02 AM
1

My numbers may be a bit screwy. you should probably get a solid source for working hours. But the general point is correct. Using vague terms, for defining very disparate groups is common issue with discussions about women's pay. One I've seen a few times is "Female medical professionals earn less than male medical professionals" In this instance the term "medical professionals" is used to make it sound like they're comparing two similar groups, your first reaction is to believe they're talking …
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:16 AM
8

If you just want to debunk it, ask one simple question.. If a company can really hire women to do the exact same work as men, and pay them just 77% of what it would cost to hire men. Why would any company in the country ever hire a man? Seriously, does anyone honestly believe that large multinational companies like Unilever and Walmart hate profit so much that they're willing to spend billions of dollars in additional wages just out of some secret desire to discriminate against women. If it was …
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:49 AM
3

The first thing to do is look at the words used, they may not mean what you think they mean. First of all, the sources for the 77 cent claim use the words "average pay" to mean the "average annual income". These statistics don't apply to hourly pay. Secondly, the term "full time" is usually defined as working more than 34 hours per week. (some use 32, other 35). On average men work longer hours than women. Using the definitions used by these studies, a women who works 34 hours a week and a man w…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:30 AM
3

I'll preface this by saying, the odds are quite good, that this child is not your son. A woman who goes round having one night stands with people on Yahoo Messenger probably has a lot of sex partners. And trying to remember which guys she slept with over a particular 2-4 week period may be rather difficult. In situations like this, with multiple potential fathers, women often determine the father via wishful thinking. i.e. "If I say it's this guy, it's most convenient for me". At this point, the…
/r/MensRights24/02/14 06:59 AM
-1

To be quite blunt, I have no idea what the hell you mean by, "anti-essentialist", "culturally materialist", "bio-social interactionism" or "sexual fluidity". This isn't a feminist subreddit, we don't spend a lot of time memorizing the academic feminist catch phrase of the week. If you want to communicate with us, you might get a better response if you speak English. Curiously I notice your equivalent post in /r/AskFeminists is actually written in a much more 'user friendly' manner, and gives a c…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:34 PM
17

For anyone to watch that video, then claim that Gutierrez was the sole aggressor, and the only one that deserves to be charges is simply absurd. The video starts with a with a scuffle in progress, then Gutierrez runs away, pursued by at least two girls, who then corner her and start attacking her. There's no way of knowing how the first scuffle started, and I could understand if they were pressing charges against all three. But to only press charges against Gutierrez is blatant demonstration of …
/r/MensRights11/01/14 09:22 PM
-1

It doesn't sound like the man even wants custody of his child If the father doesn't want custody he won't oppose her in court and the mother won't even need anyone to testify for her. On the other hand if he is opposing her, it clearly demonstrates that he does want to maintain regular contact with his child. No one spends tens of thousands of dollars in court for no reason.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:59 AM
3

Just for clarification.... You've been asked to testify against your boss's son in family court? You've also said your boss seems to be rather fond of the mother, so it may not be a clear cut issue. Your boss may support the idea, if he agrees that his son is shitty father, on the other hand he may see you as trying to take his grandchild away from him. You need to talk to your boss about this, because if he doesn't like it, it's going to make your life really shitty really quick. EDIT: Also, th…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:38 AM
3

My local mall has one, as do most malls in my area. It's two adjacent rooms. The the main door is electric, and you can only get out by pushing a button that is too high for a child to reach. The adjoining door is a waist high gate with one of those kid proof latches. The first room has 3 changing tables and a place to dispose of nappies, a small child size toilet and a grown up size toilet in a cubicle big enough for a parent to go in and help (small kids can't wipe their own asses). The next r…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 09:11 AM
11

Have you actually seen the White Ribbon Campaign? Only violence against women is important Only men perpetrate violence against women /their partners Only men are responsible for stopping violence against women. It's a multinational campaign that conveniently ignores the millions of male victims of domestic violence, the millions of male victims of other forms of violence. It ignores the millions of women who physically abuse their partners and children. White Ribbon continues to spread the myth…
/r/MensRights23/11/13 03:42 AM
9

You're right, we should just ignore a nationwide campaign that spreads misinformation and hatred against men.... /s Are you sure you're in the right subreddit?
/r/MensRights23/11/13 03:15 AM
7

OP, you might want to mention for non-Australians that Bunnings is a chain of hardware stores, the vast majority of their customers are men. As a business, they would be wise to be particularly sensitive to the opinions of men. I've expressed my opinion to them directly, and that I'll be shopping at Mitre10 (their main competitor) from now on. I encourage others to take a minute to do the same.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 03:11 AM
4

Google translate of page Just a rough translate from google.. I need feminism = Ég þarf femínisma so that = þannig að men like unknown = menn eins og die out = deyja út (the image uses 'deyi')
/r/MensRights22/11/13 09:25 PM
4

Something that seems interesting to me, is that this is a regular column by Rebecca Kamm, normally devoted to womens issues / feminism. Generally it just devolves into your standard snarky man-bashing. I don't know if it's a one off, but the NZ Herald seems to have replaced her column with this new "S/He Says". Which seems to be Feminist opinion followed by male counter opinion. I really hope they keep it.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 02:08 PM
37

Notice how the article spends more space describing the woman's rescue than on the actual assault. And to top it off the cop has the nerve to mention the White Ribbon campaign as being relevant to this event, despite the campaign denying the existence of male victims or female abusers.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 07:51 AM
18

There was a 'Pink' taxi company in my city a few years ago. It ran for a year or so before shutting. It was based on similar ideas the one mentioned in the article. Although at first glance it might seem like a workable business plan, but taxi regulations, local bylaws and staffing problems made the business unprofitable and damn near impossible to operate. e.g. 1) Taxi companies with more than X number of cabs (e.g. 10) are legally required to offer 24 hour service. Since taxi drivers effective…
/r/MensRights14/11/13 01:51 PM
8

This has already been answered well by others, but the most common way is to define 'housework' as literally 'work that occurs inside the house'. So mowing the lawns, fixing the gutters, building a fence, fixing the car etc don't count. They often deliberately discount any DIY work or home improvement. Another way the results on these things are skewed, is counting the kids watching TV as 'childcare' when Mom is home, but when Dad takes them outside to play catch, that gets counted as his 'leisu…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 12:46 AM
2

One thing to consider is how much a lawyer would cost vs any potential saving in child support.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 12:35 AM
22

I'm not in Canada or the USA so I can't be 100% sure that this applies, but it probably does. There are a lot of mail-order DNA testing companies, a lot of them work across international borders with no problem. What you need to do is find one (and obviously pay them some money). They will mail you a sterile cotton bud (Q-tip?) which you rub on the inside of your cheek to collect some of your cells, then you put it into an airtight sterile container and send it back to them. This gives them a sa…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 12:01 AM
7

The simplest response would be to ask a single question. Feminism has been around for nearly 5 decades, how it that men's issues have only started to be discussed in the last few years? Sure correlation doesn't equal causation, but the awareness of men's issues happens to coincide almost precisely with the growth of the men's rights movement. If feminists were genuinely concerned about men's issues they've had fifty years to do something about it, and yet they've done nothing!
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:23 PM
9

I'd say it's slowly been growing over the last 4-5 years. There's a couple of things to consider. Firstly since you've started to take an interest in men's issues, you've probably become more likely to visit sites or articles that discuss gender related issues so you see more discussion about men. But more than that you've started to look at things from a different perspective, you've learned to ask questions. Years ago you may have seen a video joking about violence by a woman against a man, an…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:09 PM
4

I get that the whole 'On Message' thing is kind of restrictive, and maybe AVFM doesn't suit your taste or style. But rather than spending your time trying to tear down people who are actually trying to achieve something, why don't you spend you time supporting people that align more with your viewpoint. Internal fighting has always been the Achilles heel of the MRM. Men tend to compete with each other, we need to keep that in check if we're going to get anywhere. You don't have a right to tell t…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:32 AM
6

There's no point in having lots of web hits without any real accomplishments. The goal of AVFM is to get people talking and thinking about men's issues. Web hits are an 'accomplishment'. There are groups like NCFM, SAVE and Fathers for Families working on legal cases, and lobbying politicians. And there are groups like AVFM, /r/mensrights and CAFE focusing on raising public awareness. Both are important.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:15 AM
5

AVFM seems to get a bit of a negative reaction around here, mainly because the demographic here is a lot younger. There are people here who honestly seem to believe the MRM started with /r/mensrights just a few years ago. You've been taught to be good boys, to be quiet, to sit down and shut up. You've been taught to patiently wait and eventually you'll get your turn. You've been taught to be polite, to not raise your voice, never get angry, that if you express yourself calmly and rationally peop…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:35 AM
3

Rather than looking at just the high density clusters, I'm rather curious about the low density clusters (yellow/white). They seem to be equally spaced to the high density (purple) clusters, and I can't see any purple areas that directly adjoin yellow clusters. Without knowing the city it's impossible to make anything more than a guess. As muttmonster says, it could be low cost housing, or it could be zoning for one bedroom apartments. It would be interesting to see an overlay with parks, school…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 11:54 PM
-1

I was referring to the main site, the Cracked that most people see. And it doesn't surprise me at all that John Cheese would blame himself for the failure of his marriage, the 'mea culpa' is standard practice for male feminists, and I said, everything he writes appears to be heavily edited. Most likely a mix of self-censorship and Wong looking over his shoulder. But it's actually an example of what I was talking about, so he talked about all his personal failings, did he ever talk about his expe…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:45 AM
78

They have different columnists that express different opinions. But you are correct, Cracked quite often leans in a very feminist direction.. The chief editor and if I recall founder of Cracked.com, David Wong is your typical sycophantic male feminist. The type desperate for female approval. His position means that he filters out any articles or columnists who might express any 'anti-feminist' ideas. And as 'editor' he tend to push columns and ideas that match his ideology. He also has a couple …
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:11 AM
26

A response from an actual Maasai woman... I have expressed how I feel about this piece elsewhere but I have to add my 2 cts to this discussion as a Kenyan Maasai Woman. What I find disturbing about it; Of course the obvious ‘white savior’ aspect – she came, she did and now we all should be able to follow suit. Like we needed her to come show us the way. Who told her we want to be ‘warriors’? Who told her we need to be ‘warriors’ to make a ‘difference’? The culture insensitiveness of it all – tha…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:13 PM
3

Nobody has the level of self-awareness you're claiming to posses here Isn't that exactly what the TRP is about. Being self aware, being conscious of your own sexual strategy & behavior, and modifying it to change your personal outcomes?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:49 PM
2

One of the classic old school sexual strategies was 'be a gentleman', open the door for her, walk on the kerb side of the sidewalk, pay for dinner, ask her how her day was, don't swear, don't be too forward, don't expect sex etc. 'Being a gentleman' was a perfectly valid and effective sexual strategy 40-50 years ago, it was a way of demonstrating that a man would be a good and considerate husband, at a time when the majority of women viewed dating as a means of finding a husband they would spend…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:36 PM
1

Child support should be capped at a maximum of $400/month per child. That's still more than most government departments/agencies estimate it costs to raise a child. What's interesting is the effect this would have on custody arrangements. Currently child support is taken from the non-custodial parent by force (or threat of force), the custodial parent has no incentive to agree to a more even custody arrangement, they have no incentive to honor custody agreements. The current system creates a mas…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:57 AM
7

$2600 is higher than $1875. And that's the payment for just one, Mathis has two children. (Which demonstrates that the $1875 is a starting point for child support calculations, not an upper limit.) And the article makes no mention of who has primary custody. His child may well be living with him 90% of the time.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:13 PM
12

From the very next paragraph: Courts can increase the amount of child support if the primary joint managing conservator can prove by competent evidence that there is a need for additional child support above the cap So, although it's called a 'cap' in practical terms the $1,875/month is the minimum a separated father will have to pay. Supposedly child support is meant to pay for basic necessities, food, shelter, clothing etc. From wikipedia: $4,020 is the basic cost of raising each child per yea…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:05 PM
3

The breastfeeding argument is routinely used in custody cases by mothers to interfere with fathers access to their children. i.e. The baby/child needs to be breastfed every few hours, and I (the mother) refuse to allow contact to occur in my home, and [insert excuse about how using a breast pump is not practical], therefore it is not practical to allow the father to have contact at this time. Many mothers claim to be exclusively breastfeeding when they aren't, to deliberately interfere with fath…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 08:48 AM
1

I believe he's refering to the picture in this article which gained some national attention a few years back.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 11:20 AM
7

I know I shouldn't ask... but why Matt Damon? (Am I missing some massive internet meme that would make him relevant to M/R?)
/r/MensRights24/06/13 12:01 PM
10

Can anyone actually confirm whether this is true, or just one lawyers opinion? Based on my experience with NZ family law an unmarried father has to go to court and 'make a case for access' whether he was at the birth or not.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 01:58 AM
2

I was a cub, and then a scout at the time that girls started being admitted to The Scouts in my own country. As soon as even one girl joined the troop/pack there was a noticeable change in the activities we engaged in and the behavior in the group. Although I probably didn't appreciate it at the time, in retrospect one the best things about cubs/scouts was that it was a space for boys to get together and do 'boy stuff". We climbed the hell out of everything we could reach, we played rugby and bu…
/r/MensRights25/05/13 02:45 AM
28

Seriously, I've had to do this a couple of times. Just tell a staff member "There's no change table in the men's room, so I'm going into the women's room to change a nappy. Could you please check that there are no women in there before I go in." Then just go strolling off to the women's room while the staff member scurries ahead to try get there before you. Only one time have I had a staff member say "No you can't do that", so I said. "Sweet, no worries, in that case I'm going to change the napp…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 04:06 AM
4

This was a great read. It was interesting to see these ideas expressed in an academic format.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:44 AM
1

a) women display their sexuality for many reasons other than manipulating men, Could you please give some examples? I agree that not every use of a woman's sexuality is equivalent to violence, just as not every use of men's strength is an act of violence. But strength can be used to manipulate or control both objects and people. Sexuality has very little effect on objects. b) a woman displaying herself sexually is not equivalent to a man committing a violent crime Both are using a physical advan…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:49 AM
2

The farmer controls the ox with force. But does he really? The ox is much stronger than the farmer, the ox could easily overpower the farmer if it so chose. True there is a component of force, but a much deeper level of control comes from the farmer understanding the natural behavior of the ox, rewarding it when it' 'good', punishing it when it's 'bad' (good & bad being defined by what suits the farmers interests), and raising the ox since it was young to obey the farmer and respect him as an au…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:43 AM
1

Are you saying that when a farmer uses an ox pull a plough for them, it's the ox that has the actual power, and the farmer is powerless?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 11:21 PM
9

I do actually understand what you're saying OP, a similar idea has been bouncing around in my head for some time. And it's a very difficult thing to explain without sounding like you're endorsing violence. To express it by way of video game analogy, men's strength and women's sexuality/sex appeal are like the special abilities of our respective character classes. Like all special abilities they're only useful in certain circumstances, and they have limitations on what you can achieve with them. …
/r/MensRights10/05/13 01:32 PM
2

Actually field hockey tends to be seen as a girls sport in most English speaking countries, regardless of whether ice hockey is played. It's a peculiarity of the Anglosphere. On the other hand mens field hockey is wildly popular in parts of Asia and Europe.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 08:13 PM
2

You might be interested in some articles written by Obsidian on The-Spearhead He also has his own blog
/r/MensRights28/04/13 12:03 AM
4

They really seem to be disproportionately targeting Hispanic and Black men and other immigrant communities. Does the person running this site have any link to White Nationalism?
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:44 AM
-2

From the original article. Clark has previous convictions for indecently assaulting a teenage boy I fully agree that watching anime should not be illegal, but this guy isn't someone we should be present as an innocent.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:05 AM
1

I assume you already know, but there's a new article on The Spearhead which I believe is for you. What’s Anger Management Like?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 10:35 PM
3

I hate to tell you this but Anger Management classes are something of a Kafka-trap when they're used in family court. You might be interested in www.the-spearhead.com it's a site run by W.F. Price, who also lives in Washington State. He's been through divorce, family court and he talks about it a lot. He is very well known in the mens rights community. Here's an article he wrote that mentions that he was required to attend anger management classes Perhaps you could even try his contact page and …
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:32 AM
13

Because Feminism isn't a civil rights movement, it's an ideology. You need a 'theoretical framework' if your objective is to control other people. It's pseudo-intellectual theories have allowed Feminism to infiltrate academia, and government.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:14 PM
2

Does anyone know how sponsored links work? Do you pay for a certain number of weeks? or is it a certain number of page views? or clicks? i.e. If it's just a certain number of clicks, couldn't we all just click it till it goes away?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:09 PM
8

Mancave: A place where all that remains of masculinity is hidden away so it will not offend feminine eyes. Roped off, to be exhibited for mockery.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:26 AM
2

It'll just turn into trollapalooza. Feminists already make a career of invading any male centric space, there's no need to help them.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 08:19 AM
2

Here's an article regarding the law on stuff.co.nz Television 3 News Radio New Zealand An editorial in the New Zealand Herald All the above are good quality news sources. Stuff is a major news website (although sometimes criticized, it's owned by Fairfax media which also owns several regional newspapers), the Herald is Auckland's (the largest city) only daily newspaper and probably has the highest circulation in the country, it's owned by APN. Radio New Zealand is owned by the New Zealand govern…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:10 AM
14

One recent law change in NZ now allows the government to prosecute and fine men, if their female partners commit benefit fraud. (Whether the men are aware of it or not). The supposed principle being that 'he' has somehow financially benefited from 'her' crime and should therefore be held accountable. Strangely there seems to be no push to prosecute female partners of burglars and armed-robbers, even though they also financially benefit from the crimes of their partners.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:16 PM
65

Do whatever you have to do, say whatever you have to say, promise anything you have to promise.. to make sure she goes through with that abortion. There is no guilt, there's no morality, there's no right or wrong, this is pure survival. She has betrayed your trust in way that words are insufficient to describe. You have to do whatever is necessary to protect yourself. If you need to talk with her about how many kids you're going to have together in 5 years time 'when you're ready', do it. If you…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 10:31 AM
3

The Christchurch Civic Creche Case was national news for months/years on end in the early 90's. Basically 1 man (Peter Ellis) and 4 women were accused of molesting kids at a childcare centre. It was right in the middle of the recovered memory hysteria, they interviewed over 100 children using incredibly questionable methods, leading questions, putting words in the mouths of small children. Just letting small kids tell stories and taking it all as the absolute truth without any corroborating evid…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 10:04 AM
5

Although I agree with the intent of the ECC in that summary you linked to, I can certainly see why men would feel uncomfortable working with them or within an environment under their control. Their use of terms like 'safe men', 'destructive males' seems to imply a predominantly negative view of men. I also object to the implication that male ECE and Primary teachers can be used as some of kind proxy-father figure for children without a man in their home life. No one expects female teachers to ta…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:35 AM
1

Paul Keating didn't even do that. Here's the picture His arm was around her back, just under her armpit. But you are correct about how hysterical the media was about it being disrespectful.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 01:19 AM
4

You are correct that the 2 men 1 woman format is very common on morning radio, but have you paid attention to the dynamic, the way the hosts interact with each other? Most radio shows focus on light humor, the most common structure for that is one male host, and the female host picking on or mocking the other male host for some foolish behavior/being fat/being lazy etc. Essentially one of the male hosts is the 'whipping boy'. Occasionally, just for variety, they flip it round and the whipping bo…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:37 PM
6

I hate to be that guy that yells [citation needed] but I'd really like to see a break down of how much screen time men and women actually get respectively. Certainly the TV shows I watch tend to be dominated by men, but that's a self selection bias, I'm the target audience for TV shows I like to watch... One of the main aspects would be that men prefer to see characters performing actions, whether it's storming a castle or defusing a bomb, and the target audience for action based TV shows (men) …
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:03 AM
13

Feminism teaches women that they are not responsible for their own failures. It teaches them that the reason they didn't get that job wasn't because they were less qualified, it was because they were discriminated against. It teaches them that the reason they can't afford that new car they want isn't because they took an easy job with short hours, it's because they're paid less for being a woman. It teaches them that life is harder for women, and that men always get everything they want without …
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:22 AM
19

The Masculism Movement has always been a wholly owned subsidiary or Feminism. That's why it never had any success. Masculism dates back to the 80's, it was started by male feminists and is founded on feminist ideals. Although it claimed to be a male equivalent of Feminism, it was basically the 'Mens Auxillary' arm of the Feminist movement. It's always been very focussed on what men can do to help women. (basically it's a mangina club). Back when it first started a lot of men were looking for som…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 07:04 PM
5

It could also be that a men with children are expected to behave more responsibly than men without children. Effectively men with children are held to a higher standard. Although the same would hold true of married men, judges may well see sending a married man to prison as harming his family. With a single man judges have no such concerns.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 01:16 PM
7

There's actually a second layer punishment/penalty going on here. One would assume that single men who are fathers would be paying child support, which continues to accrue while in prison, and obviously being in prison they have no way to make child support payments. So not only do separated fathers receive higher sentences, when they get out of prison they immediately find themselves owing a large sum of child support arrears. (And potentially risk being sent back to prison if they can't pay.) …
/r/MensRights21/02/13 01:08 PM
8

I appreciate that we get a lot of trolls here, but his account is over 10 months old, and his comment history is consistent with a MR lurker / secondary account. He even mentions having a wife and two kids as far back as 10 months ago. It seems a lot of effort to go to for a troll.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 10:54 AM
3

If you're happy, that's awesome... But just out of curiosity, could you check back with us in a couple of years to let us know how your relationship is going.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:08 AM
2

If you have a smartphone there are a couple of apps you can get. Get one that records all your incoming and outgoing phonecalls, you can set it to record automatically. Odds are you won't need it... but just in case... She may say something stupid like "If you don't move out I'll tell the cops you hit me".. It could save your ass. If you're in the home with her, it's a bit harder, there are apps that can record like a dictaphone, It may be worth getting one, especially if it compresses to mp3 or…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:17 AM
2

According to wikipedia the US prison population started to steadily increase around 1980, just 7 years after 1973. The most likely cause is the war on drugs, it seems to coincide with the start of Reagan's Presidency. You might be able to find more information if you can find out what sort of crimes people were being imprisoned for. Did they incarcerate men for non-payment of child support in 1980? I don't think they did, but the war on drugs definitely created a lot of fatherless households. An…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:15 PM
7

I wonder how much they will charge men for this app to do 'damage control'. It's basically extortion. Would charging for the men's app be grounds for criminal prosecution?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 05:20 AM
1

This site might be able to give you more New Zealand specific information.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:14 AM
15

Man, I feel for you. I had to deal with this for a couple of years, no where near as bad as you've got it though. I know it's not much consolation, but the older your son gets, the more he'll be able to think and speak for himself, and if she keeps trying to manipulate him, it will drive a wedge between them. It's never going to be easy, but it will get easier.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:08 PM
5

Obviously if you want to gain support you don't want to be too controversial, and your budget will place limits on what you can achieve. Any Men's center is going to be more of a forwarding center that offers basic support and advice, but directs men who need more specialized in depth support to the appropriate organizations. But here are a few ideas... Mental health Drug and alcohol addiction or abuse Dealing with suicide, depression, loneliness and stress. (The women's center will no doubt wan…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:47 PM
10

It's telling that when you choose two issues to represent MRM issues you care about, you choose Paternal leave (that would have a side effect of benefiting women in the work place), and male rape victims paying child support (a high profile but rare occurrence that 99% of the general public think is horribly unjust). But you seem to avoid subjects that are more central to the MRM like presumptive shared custody, false rape accusations, or mens lack of reproductive rights. You don't care about me…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:30 AM
14

I think it's wonderful that you spent almost half your post telling us what a special snowflake you are and how you're different from all the those other mean ole feminists.... Because that's exactly what every other feminist who turns up here says... (You might wanna try googling NAFALT, what you're doing is so common we needed to make an acronym for it.) Feminists have spent the last 50 years destroying the family, demonising men, and forcing fathers out of their children's lives.... and you e…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:44 AM
3

I understand your point, I was just thinking about it the other day. What you need to understand is the power differential in a separated relationship with children. I might have a nice little bit of paper written by a judge telling me when I can and can't see my kids, but if my ex wants to make things difficult (turn up late, claim my kids are sick, talk shit about me in front of them) , she can, and there's not a hell of a lot the court or anyone else will do about it. On the other hand moving…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:17 AM
1

I agree with your decision completely. I've refused friend requests from my ex by simply telling her I don't use it very much. Honestly I use facebook only minimally since the separation, mostly because of facebooks limited privacy controls. I've seen too many guys make an offhand/stupid/drunk comment on facebook that gets taken out of context or blown out of proportion by their ex, it just leads to unnecessary conflict. Even worse, I've seen facebook comments or photo's presented in court (out …
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:47 AM
4

As far as I know Marc Lepine (or by his birthname: Gamil Rodrigue Liass Gharbi) had no connection or knowledge of the MRM. While feminists routinely try to fabricate some sort of link between him and the MRM, one of the things the media seems to go to great lengths to ignore is that his father was Algerian and a strict Muslim with a very negative view of western women and feminism. Lepine was a very disturbed individual, raised in a violent home and taught the worst side of Islamic culture. Of c…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:34 AM
0

I literally just proved to you that Women got the vote half a century after black men In New Zealand women got the vote in 1893, men got the vote in 1867, that's 26 years. In Norway the difference was 15 years, Austria, Poland, Hungary, the difference was 0 years... You are deliberately choosing the most extreme example and presenting it as if it is the norm.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:05 PM
3

Their Myths & Facts page is encouraging, But I am concerned that a couple of their directors (Patti Giggins and Ruth Slaughter) appear to be from the domestic violence industry, and may support the Duluth model. But they do seem to be substantially outnumbered in the organisation by people who clearly care about men.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:31 AM
6

I'm not in the US, but perhaps the situation where I live translates to the US. The government provides a basic 'safety net' for single mothers, essentially it's equivalent to an income from an unskilled working class man. The net result is that if a working class couple separate, the wife has very little change in her standard of living (the husband comparatively has a noticeable drop). On the other hand for middle class or wealthy couples, the wife experiences a substantial drop in her standar…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 02:21 AM
1

Don't use the D word, some of us find it's usage to be offensive. There's nothing wrong with a man who takes pride is his appearance.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:40 AM
1

what do you have to lose? You mean other than giving the mother grounds for a protection order?
/r/MensRights11/11/12 08:12 AM
3

There are two main kinds of paternity test. The cheapest, often called a 'peace of mind' test, only requires samples from the father and the child. It's also the least accurate. Although the prefered source of DNA is a mouth swab, some companies are willing to work with other sources such a hair from a brush or blood from a band-aid. Peace of mind tests are not valid as evidence in court. The more accurate and expensive 'court approved' test requires mouth swab DNA samples to be take from the fa…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:50 AM
-1

Your opinion might be worth more if you were using your main account. Seriously, a two year old account with only 900 karma... You're either a troll, or SRS.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:38 AM
28

If I recall correctly, the 1 in 4 statistic came from a phone survey of women who called a Women's Refuge. They were asked if they had ever (in their entire lives) experienced violence of any kind from a partner. Rather typical statistical distortion, survey a very biased sample group with a question designed to catch as many positive results as possible, then claim it applies to the entire population. Personally I'm rather surprised to find out that only 1 in 4 women who call a Women's Refuge h…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 07:18 PM
24

I haven't been around much, but have I missed an episode or something... When has this sub made any threats to dox srs/sa ?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 09:21 AM
2

Erick, I just want to say that the best thing about reading The Punch, is your comments. I may disagree with you in a few areas, but you always make the debate interesting.. I appreciate your dedication.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:50 PM
0

Not really a serious M/R issue. But I do get your point, its pretty shitty having a plate of treats in front of you all day, and being told you can't have any because you're not a woman. The women in your office don't sound like particularly pleasant people. Here's an idea... You could jokingly mention to someone in H/R or management, "I told my girlfriend about the guys not being allowed to have any chocolate.. She wants to know when I'm suing you for creating a hostile work environment... [lau…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 08:32 AM
7

About 1 year ago the most popular misandry definition had about 1500 votes total (and about 10 different definitions). Now, it has 30,233 votes and many many pages of spam intended to obscure any alternate definitions. For comparison the top definition of misogyny has a mere 650 up votes. This sudden mass of voting on definitions like 'misandry' and 'mra' started about a year ago, just after a similar post was published on /MR and other MRM website.. TL/DR Someone is running a bot or a script, o…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:49 AM
0

An chance you could post that email address?.. I'd personally love to waste a little more of their "valuable time"... (It's a bit hard to cut and paste from an image.)
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:43 AM
3

Prostitution was legalised in New Zealand in 2003, in many ways it serves a an example of what would happen if prostitution were legalised in the US (both English speaking, western, relatively wealthy countries.) The primary purpose of legalisation was to protect prostitutes. e.g. I recall reading an IAMA by an American prostitute saying that when she tried to quit, the brothel owner beat her unconscious and stole her money.. I was like WTF, call the cops... oh yeah.. you can't. With legalised p…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 08:52 PM
101

I saw this response the other week
/r/MensRights31/01/12 06:44 PM
2

I'm curious as to who would moderate this debate? Surely it should be someone neutral. I'm pretty sure everyone knows where ignatious stands on the subject, he's made his opinion clear on many occasions, and Annarchist has always chimed in to back him up. And as someone else has mentioned previously, having a moderated debate where the moderator has picked sides turns the whole thing into a farce. So who's gonna moderate it?
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:05 AM
3

Yeah, immigration didn't do any damage to native american culture. /s
/r/MensRights13/01/12 09:19 PM
1

The only people that think there is an ideological war in the mens movement are the ones running around attacking other people and calling them "tradcons". Those of us that have come from sites like The Spearhead have understood for years that theres a diverse array of viewpoints throughout the MRM, and that its one of our strengths. The quote above is from a guy called Novaseeker, he's a layman in the Eastern Orthodox Christian church, an MRA and and a regular writer for The Spearhead. At the s…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 02:14 PM
3

I think that you should stop labelling a large, diverse group of people with a single, intentionally inflammatory title. Tell me, whats traditional or conservative about MTGOW? Is it the rejection of responsibility, or the focus on personal fulfilment? If anything it seems to be philosophically closer to a brand of personalised anarchism.. How about the readers of Roissy or Athol Kay, the PUAs and the guys running game, who believe in evolutionary psychology and open and unrestricted sexual acti…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 12:30 PM
2

Let me rephrase that... Why hasn't someone from r/mensrights who knows how to edit wikipedia gone in and reverted the change? (I would do it myself, but to be honest I'm not quite sure how). Obviously they would respond by editing it again. We could revert, then show the comments to demonstrate the edit is politcally motivated and request that the page be locked... If anything it will actually help us in future since we could then reference this incident to prove that edits of subjects important…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 08:16 AM
8

And you don't find the implication that all men are nothing more than "violent killers" waiting for an opportunity, to be demeaning?
/r/MensRights13/01/12 06:34 AM
3

In response to one of truthjusticeca's questions... Name the MR issues that they support and don't support? Just the front page of The-Spearhead currently mentions articles covering the media, gender based affirmative action, media portrayal of adultery and male role models, "Feminist Revisionism" of history, the effect of gender politics on science, the change in female behaviour since the advent of feminism, Jezebel & the "MRA Dad", more on gender quotas, female domination of higher education …
/r/MensRights13/01/12 05:49 AM
1

See here
/r/MensRights13/01/12 05:41 AM
1

nothing to do with men's rights, just like all the articles You're just full of shit. This is just plain trolling.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 03:55 AM
2

I'm not really familiar with wikipedia editing.. but... A) Why hasn't this been reverted yet? B) Why hasn't the comment from SRSbusiness or even this thread been submitted to Wikipedia as proof that the edit was politically motivated?
/r/MensRights12/01/12 11:55 PM
1

The point isn't the red pill / blue pill thing, its that they're deliberately deleting any reference to the existence of a mens rights movement.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 11:50 PM
10

Heres the news article Rotorua police said two women, aged 30 and 50, had been arrested and charged with aggravated assault and theft Welcome to to New Zealand... we have scum too...
/r/MensRights11/01/12 11:53 AM
2

I read somewhere recently, that there is an app for android phones that can be set to regularly record your GPS location and send that data to a secure server. (Which would make tampering difficult.) I don't know whether the data is admissible in court, but I believe the intention is to provide an ongoing alibi for people who have similar concerns to OP. Essentially when the cops bang on your door and say "Where were you at 11pm on January 2nd?' You actually have solid evidence to support your r…
/r/MensRights11/01/12 02:34 AM
2

I don't even get the point of this attempted trolling.. This stereotype may have a grain of truth in it, but only because women have more leisure time to do things like shop for presents.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 01:10 AM
5

TL:DR Poster is a bigotted SRS troll who thinks mutilating baby boys is hilarious. Downvote and move on.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 12:29 PM
3

I don't know jack about American politics, and quite frankly I get confused between Ron Paul and Ru Paul. But surely, if mens rights issues are ever going to get any traction, we need to start supporting politicians who advocate policies that help men... Otherwise... whats the point? If we're not pushing for political change, we're just complaining.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 10:46 AM
2

Just looking at google under fathers michigan Heres a few links that look promising... http://www.dadsandmomsofmichigan.org/ http://www.facebook.com/pages/Michigan-Fathers-for-Child-Support-Reform-Fathers-Against-Michigan-FOC/144156142276628 http://michiganfatherhood.org/ I know the child support link may seem out of place, but if you contact them, you can damn well bet any activist group is going know a hell of a lot about the family court system, they'll have contacts and friends, and they'll …
/r/MensRights09/01/12 05:48 AM
2

I take it he's in the US? Laws vary from state to state. My initial advice would be to search for a local fathers rights group, they may be able to offer free legal advice. If he doesn't have a custody agreement in writing, I don't know whether he has any enforceable way to see his children. I'm guessing here, but I think he's probably going to have to go to court to get a custody agreement. It sounds like the situation is urgent, so if he/you can't find a fathers group quickly, go see a lawyer.…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 11:59 PM
8

The main thing I'm confused about, is who does she think all these men are getting into new relationships with? Basically the article is 50% sexist, 50% short sighted stupidity. Just because her social circle isn't filled with single men, she concludes that they don't exist. Given her attitude, I'd guess that any single man that does meet her runs a mile. If anything it seems like she's suffering from a severe case of hypergamy, there are probably quite a few single happily separated men around …
/r/MensRights08/01/12 01:13 PM
1

So, you're saying 12 men, and 7 women made a sexist joke, out of a total of 500. So, 19 people out of 500 made a sexist joke... thats 3.8% Thats pretty much all it tell us. Unless you can give us a breakdown of the gender and marital status of the 500 people, it doesn't really say much. I've googled "Sams Club", as near as I can tell its an electronics store that targets male customers, so I'd expect more males than females to enter the store, and correspondingly more males than females to make …
/r/MensRights08/01/12 11:53 AM
1

I'd be curious to know whether there will be prosecutions against the three dozen women who made false rape complaints?
/r/MensRights08/01/12 09:02 AM
1

The Spearhead has some pretty good articles, some of the commenters can get a bit out of hand, but most of the authors make solid, salient points. Jack Donovan has a pretty good blog and he's a damn fine writer. National Coalition for Men can be interesting. AVfm do have the rhetoric turned up to 11, and while it certainly helps motivate the troops, I agree, it can be a bit alienating to new comers.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 08:46 AM
8

This is pretty much what a user from r/AMR called squibbling was doing. Coincidentally I notice that squibbling stopped posting about 2 months ago and gimmesometruth has been a redditor for exactly 2 months. I think its fair to say they're the same person. She was posting one of my comments for a while, so what I did was I went in and edited the comment of mine that she kept linking to, to cite evidence and proof that what I was saying was true. Effectively what I did was turn part of her hate c…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 03:57 AM
4

Thanks.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 02:22 AM
4

Is there any chance you could give us a TL:DR. (Or even just "Hey look at page 40") Its 60 pages of fine print, and I didn't even see any pictures.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 02:02 AM
2

From your link: During "Metzitzah", the mohel takes the now badly bleeding penis into his mouth and sucks the blood from the wounded pant I don't use this acronym often, but OMFG!
/r/MensRights08/01/12 01:55 AM
3

I believe the technical term is Jumping the Shark i.e. the moment when an established show changes in a significant manner in an attempt to stay fresh. Ironically, that moment makes the viewers realize that the show has finally run out of ideas.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 12:52 AM
7

Isn't there a large overlap between the pro-circ lobby and religious groups that don't believe in evolution?
/r/MensRights08/01/12 12:48 AM
5

You're right, the whole idea that men came home from work and bossed their wife and children around like a slavemaster is complete bullshit. If anything it was more a matter of men and women having different spheres of influence. Women got to control what happened in the home, Men got to control what happened outside the home. Generally women controlled money most of the time but men had power of veto over major expenditures (given that he's the one that would have to work overtime to pay for it…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 11:50 PM
2

"The Patriarchy" is like the Boogey Man, you can never destroy it because it doesn't exist. But it is a great excuse for feminists to demand more power and influence to "fight the Patriarchy". As for your assumption that we just don't understand what Patriarchy means. Thats been standard feminist behaviour for 50 years. Back when feminists first started talking about the Patriarchy a lot of them genuinely thought they were going to find a smoke filled room full of fat men holding cigars and sipp…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 11:20 PM
3

You do realise of course that the Flintstones was based on The Honeymooners and both were intended to be caricatures of married couples. I'm not trying to be a smart-arse, but the Flintstones was not a documentary. Thats not how husbands and wives interacted in the 1950's.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 11:02 PM
2

Thats very hard to say though. Most of us here are quite familiar with the topic of Mens Rights, and most MRA have found Wikipedia editors to be poorly informed and heavily biased in the area. If I didn't know very much about the Mens Rights Movement I would have not realised that Wikipedias perspective was so biased. So when you read an article on a subject you know little about like say the War in Aceh How do you know what you're reading isn't heavily biased? (Just reading that article there, …
/r/MensRights07/01/12 10:42 PM
3

Surely the benchmark should be more notable than the other people currently on the list and I've got to be honest, I have no idea who any of these people are, and only a handful ever made it on to the mainstream news. I mean, did you hear about Sondang Hutagalung who self immolated just 4 weeks ago? Or Tenzin Phuntsok 5 weeks ago. How about Yenesew Gebre 2 months ago? The qualification to be on the list seems to be whether your're protesting something popular like "free Tibet". And surely, Thoma…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 10:24 PM
16

Unfortunately the mens rights movement has a long term problem with wikipedia editors. There have been numerous clashes on about various subjects Such as the inclusion of Thomas James Ball in the List of political self-immolations. When someone from the MRM added TJ Ball, it was immediately removed, then the article was radically altered and the word "notable" was added. After a brief edit war the editors decided Thomas Ball didn't match their definition of "notable", and locked the page. I beli…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 12:51 PM
2

Indeed. Such surveys are normally done with the sole purpose of trying to pigeon-hole us, or "prove" what we're saying doesn't matter because some proportion of the respondents match someones definition of "privilege". Thats why I always answer them completely honestly. /s Meridiani Planum, Mars.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 11:21 AM
6

Now they have. Here's the link in r/australia
/r/MensRights07/01/12 03:27 AM
2

Has anyone cross posted this to r/australia ?
/r/MensRights06/01/12 11:34 PM
1

Looking through your comment history, I can't help noticing that you keep repeating that same line "U Mad Dumb Faggot?". I understand that English may be a second language for you, but surely you can put together a sentence with better grammar if you tried. As for the question you keep repeating, No, I am not a mentally unstable gay man of questionable intelligence. Why are you so desperate to find one? I appreciate that the world can be a lonely place, and the internet can be a wonderful way to…
/r/MensRights06/01/12 09:00 AM
7

From the article... The point isn’t to excuse Barnes for murder; that is a crime no sane society can tolerate. But what we can do is try to prevent incidents like this
/r/MensRights06/01/12 08:44 AM
2

Excellent, a change of tactic, gender based insults and tired cliche's. (Unfortunately for you they only work on people who are insecure, and uncertain of their sexual orientation. You're obviously projecting a bit there ;-) Tell me, is everyone from ManhoodAcademy this stupid, or do you take special pills?
/r/MensRights06/01/12 06:15 AM
6

To remove man-hating from feminism would be to extract the DNA nucleus from a living cell
/r/MensRights06/01/12 03:20 AM
1

Don't forget sluts and whores. I'm curious where terms that feminists find offensive will get downvotes. However I wonder whether including too many keywords might cancel out any upvoting/downvoting.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 02:53 AM
1

One thing you need to remember is that with most of the stories you hear about women running off with the children and hiding them from their fathers, the women are being helped by groups such as Womens Refuge. It's much easier to go into hiding when you're being helped by an organisation with 1000's of safehouses and a small army of militant lesbian man-hating radical feminists. As a man, there is no comparable organisation to help you.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 02:48 AM
2

Linking to ManhoodAcademy? Really? EDIT: tasteycakesmfer, sending me insults in private messages is pretty pathetic. Grow some balls and actually say what you've got to say in public. Not that it even counts, "redditor for 11 hours", obvious troll is obvious. And a hint for the future, trying to insult someone by making derogatory remarks about their sexual orientation only works if they think theres something wrong with being gay. ManhoodAcademy are nothing more than a bunch of pathetic trolls.…
/r/MensRights06/01/12 02:40 AM
1

I regularly read her site ifeminist.com She's pretty much the only person I've ever seen that simultaneously calls themselves a feminist and treats mens rights issues as valid and important. Having said that, although she does seem to genuinely want a fair society, she still sees things overwhelmingly from a female perspective. (funny that) e.g. The incident where a woman was beaten during protests in the middle east. Apparently one woman being beaten is a horrific crime, hundreds of men being b…
/r/MensRights06/01/12 12:58 AM
6

It would have been interesting to see his press-agent spin it as Tiger (a victim of physical abuse) seeking love and affection outside of his physically abusive marriage, holding him up as a hero who took regular beatings just so he could stay with his kids. (Does anyone actually believe that was the first time she ever hit him?)
/r/MensRights06/01/12 12:18 AM
3

Oh I didn't say find innocent people, I said "police officer / family court judge / lawyer / journalist". I assure you, it would be quite easy to find members of those groups who deserve to get some negative publicity. They also coincidentally have the power to get the website in question shut down or sued out of existence. The best way to win a battle is to get your opponents to fight each other.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 01:27 PM
1

But what I find interesting is that I don't see any regular r/mr commenter in that thread, but its full of r/mr ideas and opinions....
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:58 AM
1

To be fair the OP's comment history indicates an interest in racism. That doesn't imply that he's racist. It seems no different to the postings from r/mr regulars who have obviously been reading r/feminisms. This whole "Why have r/whiterights linked to you?" pops up every few months. Its a fair question, with a simple explanation.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:37 AM
16

She's being charged for it. No, she's not being charged for it. Thats the whole point of the submission. The fact that the guy has been assaulted has been completely ignored by the police. Did the guy even press any charges In most places I'm aware of the victim of domestic violence is not required to press charges for police to make an arrest, it's assumed that the victim of abuse will be too scared/intimidated. Why would this rule suddenly be ignored when the victim is male?
/r/MensRights02/01/12 09:00 PM
8

But who will pay the child support?
/r/MensRights02/01/12 08:38 PM
15

Since when has Domestic Violence and Reduced Female Sentences not been a MR issue?
/r/MensRights02/01/12 08:35 PM
3

Surely the easiest way to take care of this website is for every one of us to sign up for an account, then over the next few months submit our own "deadbeat dad". And by "deadbeat dad" I mean use the name and photo of a local police officer / family court judge / lawyer / journalist. Then once the site is full of false submissions, it not only becomes useless, but it becomes incredibly easy to sue them for libel. Don't forget to use a proxy server to hide your identities.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 08:00 PM
1

Relevance to r/mensrights ?
/r/MensRights29/12/11 12:02 PM
1

I don't deny that women care about their sons, nor do I suggest that they don't care about their romantic partners, but you must admit that theres a fair degree of self interest in such behaviour. Their sons carry their DNA, and are potentially a source of many grandchildren, their romantic partners are a source of financial and emotional support. What I'm referring to is the way that men will place themselves in danger to protect women they don't even know. The way that men will risk their live…
/r/MensRights29/12/11 11:21 AM
2

The two maps may well indicate which states have the highest rates of wealth transfer from men to women. i.e. States with the highest levels of alimony and child support.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 07:49 AM
5

I think generally if you say what in your personal history caused you to be angry\mistrustful\suspicious of feminists\women, you will get a better reaction Actually quite the opposite. Men who express their position in an anecdotal manner will be attacked as bitter/angry/self-centred/short-sighted. It's a little quirk of human psychology that women who have experienced mistreatment/brutality/suffering can expect pity and sympathy when they tell their story. On the other hand men who have similar…
/r/MensRights29/12/11 05:28 AM
3

Its almost as if they planned the study to produce a positive result.... How many men are actually going to self report a high "rape proclivity"? I bet even a convicted rapists would self report a low rape proclivity. You may as well ask people if they think they're evil. (hint: everyone thinks they're a good guy, even serial killers.) Using a survey afterwards, written by people looking for rape proclivity, is bound to produce a higher result than the initial self reported results.. Using this …
/r/MensRights28/12/11 11:50 PM
2

Incredibly obvious troll is incredibly obvious. Trying to insult MGTOW by insinuating that they're homosexual is flawed on two counts. 1) Choosing to avoid financially supporting or having long term relationships with women doesn't mean you can't have sex with them. Many MGTOW may choose celibacy but that doesn't mean its compulsory. 2) You assume that being called gay is an insult. (hint: It isn't). Only bigots such as yourself think calling a man gay will insult him. (Honestly, code lavender s…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 06:27 PM
1

So fucking what. They're irrelevant.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 11:30 AM
7

Doesn't your second paragraph pretty much describe Alan from Two-And-A-Half Men? Its easy to forget, but the first few seasons of that show were actually good, and at the time a refreshingly honest comparison between a divorced father and a never married man. Sure he was reckless and irresponsible, but Charlie actually enjoyed his life, Alan was permanently miserable.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 10:18 PM
22

And if a male guard was caught watching a female prisoner masturbate.....
/r/MensRights24/12/11 10:34 AM
6

I've never heard of that. Conflating different issues is a well worn feminist tactic dating back to the 70's. Pretty much any time your hear "1 in [number between 3 and 9] women[/girls/female college students] have been [raped/molested/discriminated against] you can bet the survey involves either conflated results or a skewed sample group. The skewed sample group is the primary source of ridiculous feminist statistics. Take for instance this "study" that was published in national British newspap…
/r/MensRights23/12/11 05:34 AM
2

Thats the part that most irks me about child support. As a parent I am more than willing to contribute fairly towards the costs of raising my child. But the difference between the way the state treats different parents is appalling. A custodial parent is treated with dignity and respect, they are left to their own discretion to determine how much money should be spent on their child. A non-custodial parent however is treated like a naughty schoolboy who can't be trusted to contribute towards or …
/r/MensRights23/12/11 04:46 AM
3

Our companies will receive $18,000 in funding, free office space, product development and design support, mobile-marketing promotions..... we receive a 6% equity stake in each company. Essentially what they're doing is saying "I want to buy something (a part share in a company) but I will only buy from women". Its somewhat similar to saying "Im hungry, but I'm not buying any food thats been cooked by a filthy [insert minority]". It makes them a bunch of bigoted shitheads, but it's not technicall…
/r/MensRights22/12/11 10:26 AM
1

I don't really know whether its possible for her to fake how much money he owes. Where I live all the money goes through a child support collection agency, which takes the money off the father gives it to the mother. If he pays her directly she could be claiming she never received the money (He should never, never give her cash, always use a bank payment, or something that leaves a record.) The other explanation, is where I live the child support collection agency has the authority to impose "pe…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 07:46 PM
1

If both "children" are over 20 I'm pretty sure the father shouldn't be paying child support any more. Most places I know of child support stops at 18 or 19. From what you've told us I'd guess what his Dad is paying off is arrears from the time when he couldn't afford the full payment. As far as I'm aware there is no time limit on this. However he should at least have a definite total amount that he owes. The court won't lower the child support payments, because child support stopped when your bo…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 11:48 AM
10

The similarities between the two ideologies are quite disturbing Maybe you should learn what you're supporting.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 12:37 PM
6

Her Google+ Page is the typical narcissistic/asinine ramblings you'd expect of a 21 year old woman in our culture. She's obviously no great thinker.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 08:42 AM
-5

Thanks for doing this. You've actually supplied evidence to support your position, which is a hell of a lot more than Ignatious did when he started banning people. r/mensrights is too small to have a mod going around insulting, abusing, mocking, and banning members that he disagrees with. We need all the members we can get. We need a mod that's inclusive and tolerant of diverse viewpoints, one that encourages debate rather confrontation. The current moderation team seems incapable of doing that.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 10:11 AM
4

Sure hes abrasive and rude sometimes, but stinkybutt didn't ban anyone or force anyone to leave r/mr. Two long time members with similar ideological positions just got banned for vague nonspecific reasons, If anyone looks like they're trying to split r/mr its Ignatious. You can expect Demonspawn to be banned next, and I'm sure I'm on the list somewhere.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 05:18 AM
2

Are you talking 3 whole days? (which would be frickin amazing) Or a few hours on three different days? (which is what I would expect.) Also here's a quick rundown of my mediation experience (note I'm in a different country to you, but I'm guessing mediation is pretty similar). First of all the mediation is led by a neutral lawyer, who sits at the head of a boardroom table. On either side of him sat myself and my ex partner, next to us sat our respective lawyers. Next to my ex's lawyer sat lawyer…
/r/MensRights06/12/11 02:51 PM
2

I had a mediation recently. First of all I'd suggest that you need a clear idea of exactly how much contact/custody you want. When you go in, you need a "parenting plan". When they ask you what contact you want, you need to have an answer.... Dont say this -> "Errr, I think, maybe a few days a week, I think.. ...." Do say something like this -> "The majority of pediatric psychologists recommend that non custodial parents of children under 5 years old should have contact with the child a minimum …
/r/MensRights06/12/11 06:27 AM
-2

The third option is that the girl in question is going through an exhibitionist phase as she gets used the the attention her body draws from men. It's quite common for young women as they reach the latter stages of puberty. She may have thought it was a fun harmless game to walk around in her underwear, teasing the "dirty old man" across the road, but then her parents caught her, or she told someone, and she gets asked.. "how many times have you done this?"
/r/MensRights06/12/11 05:54 AM
6

Did anyone else notice the part that says Court documents state Weinblatt watched a 12-year-old girl change clothes on four different occasions in October How would they notice the first time and do nothing? This case doesn't make any sense, unless you assume that the girl knew he was watching her change, and repeatedly chose to change in front of the same window where she would be watched.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 08:42 PM
3

To the guys running register-her.com, this looks like cheap attention whoring. Yes, putting Katherine Heigl on the register may possibly get you and the MRM a bit of media attention, but it will also make you and us into a laughing-stock. And, going forward, anyone who doesn't know much about the MRM who starts looking at register-her.com will find the entry for Katherine Heigl and just dismiss the entire site. She's an actress! She said something offensive, while playing a character in a comedy…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 08:21 PM
5

I'd like to offer an different interpretation. Lets be blunt, we all know women who use emotional overeaction to manipulate and control others. Who hasn't seen a woman turn on the waterworks to avoid some unpleasant consequence? Who hasn't seen a woman respond to a minor criticism with a wall of tears? Who hasn't seen a woman become furiously angry over some minor disagreement or inconvenience? And who hasn't known women that respond to a man who honestly expresses his emotions with the clichéd …
/r/MensRights01/12/11 08:43 AM
4

You have no idea what you're talking about! Have you ever met a sex worker? The vast majority of sex workers in my part of the world (where its legal) are university students. They've figured out that they can earn $150/hr, and pay off their student loan by working 1 day a week for 6 months.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 07:31 AM
7

Shouldn't we be making an effort to contact their employers, their neighbours, etc ? Surely they have a right to know that these women are advocating for their death.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:41 PM
2

The author seems to be both completely unfamiliar with basic male psychology and common logic. Surely if men were easily intimidated by the appearance of male porn stars, porn producers wouldn't be using guys that look like they spend their whole life in a gym/tanning spa.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:02 AM
1

Fair enough. I admit I know very little about game other than basic principles and a few examples.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 07:16 PM
5

perspective* parents *prospective parents. They can't even proof read their own website.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 08:24 AM
4

I'm no great fan of game, but the guys in r/seduction might be able to give you some advice about "married game". Try cross posting. (If you're unfamiliar with "game", basically its about changing your behaviour in specific ways to make your wife feel less confident about herself, and more attracted to you. As others have said, the law gives your wife all the power in your marriage, game gives you a chance to take some of it back.)
/r/MensRights21/11/11 07:25 PM
2

So you're going to try to dismiss an entire article , because you don't like one line? Have a look below it, you'll see almost a hundred comments from men who've experienced marriage counselling first hand, and they have an overwhelmingly negative opinion of it. Then compared to this thread full of young unmarried men who've never had to go to counselling, and are talking out their ass.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 07:18 PM
0

Its rather depressing, but I think perhaps you should read this article. Marriage Counselling is Useless You may find the comments on the article interesting as well.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 12:40 PM
2

You deleted your comment.. how sad
/r/MensRights17/11/11 09:50 AM
3

What your proposing the the default system in a matriarchal society, where men have little or no investment in their children. The men in such societies lead a rather easy life, hunting, fishing, playing games, drinking etc. They normally only work about 10-15 hours a week since they only need to support themselves. On the other hand women in matriarchal societies are required to almost double their workload. Since men won't work to support children they have no investment in, women are forced t…
/r/MensRights17/11/11 07:09 AM
8

Not unless you want to have an argument every single class with a zealot who refuses to see any other point of view. You'll be about as welcome as a evolutionary biologist in a bible class. If you haven't already, you might want to read a little about a guy called Tom Martin Don't give them your money, unless you want to get it back by suing them! (I know, I know, not all Christians are anti science, its just a metaphor to convey a point.)
/r/MensRights16/11/11 12:48 PM
1

As Brute said, probably a pimple. Another possibility is that it could be an insect bite (bed bugs?). But I assume you would have mentioned any itchiness. Another possibility is an ingrown hair. It doesn't sound urgent, maybe discuss it with your doctor next time you see him.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 12:14 PM
4

OP What is it specifically that bothers you about this article.. The dumbass comment about womens multitasking skills? Well, when men are working they are doing just that: working. They are singularly focused. Women, though, can do 100 things at once. We can participate in a conference, notice we need a manicure, write a to-do list AND wonder what our boyfriend is doing — all at the same time. That would make a man’s head explode. Its dumb, but not exactly rage worthy.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 04:16 AM
5

From my experience in family court, and from talking to other men, a woman can make the most outrageous and horrendous accusation with absolutely no evidence to support it. Apparently it doesn't count as perjury as long as you prefix your statement with "I believe....." e.g. "My dog recently went missing, I believe LaurensBER has kidnapped and killed it because she is angry with me for telling the truth about her on reddit." ^ I've seen a statement like that in a sworn affidavit. It's not perjur…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:26 PM
2

From my understanding, your clients are primarily married (divorcing) individuals with high incomes? Do you have much experience involving low income unmarried couples? Do you think that may affect your perspective on the fairness of custody rulings? (Its my contention that wealthy men who can afford expensive lawyers come out ok in custody cases, its the poor guys who can barely afford to go to court, or have to represent themselves against their ex's lawyer that get screwed.)
/r/MensRights12/11/11 05:11 AM
1

Is he worried about losing his readership to reddit?
/r/MensRights11/11/11 10:18 PM
63

I wouldn't trust her or her lawyer. They'll get you to drop your case, then demand the full amount of child support. It'll take you months and thousands of dollars to restart your case, and when you do, they'll use the fact that you previously dropped it as proof that you're "flaky" and unsuitable as a parent.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:26 PM
2

I take it you've never been in family court. Paranoia is the safest course of action.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:06 AM
7

I'd give it 3/10. Good concept, poor execution.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:05 AM
2

Yeah, I don't see this ever being used by a group of teenage girls to bully and tease another girl/boy until they commit suicide. /s
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:01 AM
3

Do we have a word in the English language that means "all animals excluding humans"?
/r/MensRights08/11/11 07:10 PM
1

But if you get ordered to pay child support you can't afford, you're going to jail anyway. Would you rather offer a guy $5k to take a DNA test for you, or be forced to pay $250k to some women who lied about using birth control?
/r/MensRights07/11/11 06:12 AM
1

I hate to give you this advice, because it annoys the hell out of me when I see it. But I regularly see single mothers of boys with disciplinary problems going to meet teachers, and whining, complaining, demanding to see the Principal, complaining to the Ministry of Education, complaining to the local member of government, yelling discrimination, and quite simply screaming blue murder and kicking up such a fuss, that the school will back down just to get them to shut up. Keep it in mind as a bac…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 08:54 AM
4

If I were Biebers agent, I'd spend $1M to hire a look alike to take the DNA test for him. Cheaper in the long run. Actually, I wonder if there's a website where men could discreetly upload their own photo and find their own doppelgänger? For purely entertainment purposes of course... Hmm...I see a business opportunity for a website developer.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 08:27 AM
1

What, was the comparison a bit too close for comfort?
/r/MensRights01/11/11 09:43 AM
3

You seem to have a real bee in your bonnet about the lack of banning. You've mentioned it many times. Why is that? Do you feel invalidated? Perhaps I could make a whole load of subbreddits, and then ban you from all of them. Would that make you feel better? And if you were banned from /r/mensrights, wouldn't you just come back with another username? At least we know who you are. (You're like that crazy old aunt who sits in her rocking chair screaming about immigrants while pissing in her depends…
/r/MensRights31/10/11 11:27 AM
0

Yeah sure, and those mainstream Nazis were nothing like those nasty Radical Nazis.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 05:16 AM
1

This little tiff between AVfM and Immalafide is not benefiting anyone. If you both keep throwing shit at each other, you both just end up covered in shit.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 03:26 AM
2

Simplest solution, start a new facebook account, but don't tell her. Keep the old one solely for monitoring her behaviour (also set privacy settings to maximum)..
/r/MensRights29/10/11 03:22 AM
2

If he deletes her, he wont be able to see what shes doing. If she starts making threats etc, he needs to know.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:51 PM
1

Child support is calculated as a percentage of taxable income. 18% for one child, 24% for two etc (That's calculated using pre tax income, but has to be paid after tax. i.e. If you earn $100 pre tax. Your child support would be calculated as $18. But you first have to pay 20% ($20) income tax. So what you actually get in the hand after tax is $80, and you then have to pay the $18 child support. Leaving you with $62. (18% pre tax sounds much less than 23% of your after tax income.) IRD use your p…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:17 AM
1

We currently don't have "imputed" income as part of our child support system, and based on the way the concept is abused by the American family court, its not something I want to start. The thing is, if you take household income of both parents into account when calculating child support, as long as the wording of the legislation is gender neutral, womens hypergamous behavior will cause the real world result to slightly favor fathers. (Women normally seek out partners who earn more than they do,…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:04 PM
1

Regarding the EOW as shared care,I agree that actual shared care should be the goal, but I think its also important for the child support system to recognise the difference between fathers who spend time with their kids, and fathers who never see their kids. Even a father who only gets to see his kids EOW has significantly more financial input and outgoing that the just child support $. For a start he needs to buy / rent a house with an extra bedroom (even if it only gets used 4 nights a months)…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:03 PM
1

There's no need to second guess yourself. From your initial description, ten years ago it was a fight you couldn't win. I've seen too many men broken by the family court. Basically, you need to find to some free legal advice. Have you tried looking for fathers or mens groups in your local area / city? Where abouts are you? Also I assume you know the website http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/ they may be able to help you find a fathers group near you.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:46 AM
1

There's no mention of a paternity test, just "Jobs adamantly refused paternity" and "a judge ultimately forced Jobs to pay support." DNA tests didn't exist at the time and it was not uncommon for judges to decide paternity (in absentia) based on nothing more than the mothers word. Jobs could well have been the victim of paternity fraud. And lets be honest, if you were a solo mother looking for a baby daddy to sue for child support, future billionaire Steve Jobs would be a perfect choice.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:21 AM
2

I'm not saying this to depress you, but I think you need to be made aware of a few things about family court.... If you go to court to seek visitation, the first thing your ex (or grandma) will say is "he's never seen his son, the child has no idea who he is, he has no right to turn up out of the blue and demand visitation."... "It would be psychologically disturbing for the child." And despite the fact that you damn near killed yourself trying to obtain contact, the court will listen to her. Ju…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:57 AM
1

Is that you Aerik?
/r/MensRights25/10/11 10:28 AM
6

I've sent them a politely worded email explaining what has happened, and why they might find it to be an interesting news story, and where they can find the information they need to write the story (given that she's deleted her blog articles). A few more similar emails from other people might be helpful.... There is of course the chance that they may try to cover this as an internet bullying story. i.e Mean people from the internet pick on attractive blonde mom. But you pays your money, you take…
/r/MensRights22/10/11 12:59 AM
1

What would you guys think about contacting CBS? They've mentioned her before in an article related to paedophilia. http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2010/11/11/local-parenting-blog-outraged-over-pedophiles-guide/ I believe this is the contact page for the site. - With a "Breaking Tips" button. http://chicago.cbslocal.com/station/cbs-2/ E-Mail News Tips: [email protected] I'm not in the US, so I don't really understand the relationship between CBS, CBS2, the website, the radio stations etc If we're g…
/r/MensRights22/10/11 12:16 AM
9

My guess is that an editor (or management) from Chicago Now told her to stop poking the bear with a stick. The incident has already reached beyond just mens rights site reddit and AVfM, its been covered by Jezebel, and if it keeps going it could possibly hit Chicago local news. A news story about Chicago Now saying that all men are paedophiles wouldn't make them look good. Her blog has got the attention of CBS Chicago previously. http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2010/11/11/local-parenting-blog-outrag…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 11:58 PM
2

Despite what she wrote, I doubt she'll stop blogging, reading this last posting (before it was pulled) I got the impression she was actually enjoying the attention. (i.e. "Look at me! Look at me! I'm a poor innocent victim of these brutish thugs".....) Just look at the way she went on AVFM, made up bullshit excuses. got attacked, then started acting conciliatory. Then when everyone there told her to go f*ck herself, she went back to her blog, deleted all the evidence, and wrote a new article whi…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:46 PM
0

She's deleting comments now, and she's got a screencap from the troll.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 11:33 AM
6

When the education system has been designed to favour girls, and girls (unsurprisingly) outperform boys, of course boys are going to view education as a female (or at least "unmanly") activity. Especially when it's presented to them almost exclusively by female teachers. So if the boys in question come from a culture that has very specific expectations of manly behaviour, is anyone really surprised? The solution is quite simple, gender segregated education from a very early age, regular contact …
/r/MensRights21/10/11 09:26 AM
1

The quote that starts:- "These whores! [. . .] I'll say to you, my fellow brothers, we cannot tolerate this" is in on reddit, by a troll ! (Redditor for 5 hours, the rest off the users comments are all racist bullshit.) To be fair it's not like she's going to know a regular commenter from a troll, but she obviously looked for the most outrageous and threatening comment to quote from. The quote "I want to strangle this c-nt", I've got no idea where this is from. And the comment "I can track her d…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:18 AM
0

From her other articles... "My child is all of two years old and being carted off to a rather serious preschool complete with a syllabus and teachers with masters degrees." "And so the competition for spots in the best city schools begins at two - at serious preschools, where the application process is rigid and curriculum rivals my college education." http://www.chicagonow.com/high-gloss-and-sauce/2011/08/in-chicago-preschool-is-kindergarten/ She also mentions that her husband works 70+ hours a…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 06:38 PM
4

I was thinking that myself. Or more specifically I was thinking of getting an email address (or a few dozen potential email addresses) so that we could express our opinion directly to the preschool. Perhaps an organization like NCFM could inform them of their legal liabilities regarding discriminating on the basis of gender.... Unfortunately Chicago is a big city, with a lot of preschools. A google search brings up hundreds. Even once you take out the Catholic and religious schools (I doubt the …
/r/MensRights20/10/11 10:24 AM
2

She's doesn't believe it. She's just using shaming language to try to silence any criticism. Its feminist debate tactics 101. In this case she's using a modified code orange. http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/
/r/MensRights20/10/11 05:37 AM
17

Tuesday 14 August 2001 This article was written ten years ago. I don't think the situation has improved.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:57 AM
0

Actually you make a very good point. JCM is the abbreviation for the Jewish Childrens Museum, and 267 is the area code for Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania, as in Pennsylvania Avenue, where the White House is located, a coincidence, I think not! jcm267 is quite clearly part of a Zionist conspiracy run by children operating out of the White House, hence his obsessive concern about the activities of White Nationalists.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 11:54 AM
5

Do you have the option of leaving the country? You may want to consider moving to a different country and then changing your name. (I'm not exaggerating or joking, I know a friend who did it to avoid 18 years of child support for a child he never consented to conceiving.) It would be helpful if you already had a trusted friend or family member in the country you're moving to, to help you get sorted. My friend had an uncle in Australia, and was able to crash on his couch till he got a job etc. If…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 04:09 AM
34

As one of the commenters touched on, for young guys competing with girls in a contact sport is a no win situation. If she wins, you'll be mocked and harassed by your peers for being beaten by a girl. (In their age group this is a more serious issue than many females want to admit.) If you win, but unconvincingly, you'll be mocked and teased for barely being able to beat a girl. If you win, you'll receive no credit for your effort, in fact you'll be made to feel ashamed, because "you beat on a gi…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 12:30 PM
9

One thing women who spew this crap seem to forget, is that quite a few guys these days stay home and look after the kids, or have shared care. We know exactly how much work is involved in looking after a kid 24/7. And for comparison We also know what its like to work in a steel mill, or dig drainage ditches in the rain.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 12:15 PM
2

I just watched Horrible Bosses, it definitely had MRA themes, but I wouldn't necessarily call it a positive portrayal of men. A male victim of sexual harassment, whose friends keep telling him how lucky he is. A (semi) positive portrayal of a character who has been unfairly placed on the sex offenders registry (but it underestimates the negative consequences that would have on a man). On the other hand, the main characters are rather weak and wussy, but it wouldn't be a comedy if everyone acted …
/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:24 AM
1

I kind of got the same feeling. Maybe the it was just poor voice acting, but I'm not quite sure whether they were trying to portray Chalmers as saying something insightful,, or trying to mock him as a whiny complaining man.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 09:31 AM
5

"scaling the wall of NDP leader Jack Layton's constituency office in downtown Toronto while dressed as "Plywood Man" "dumping hundreds of live crickets at the Yellowknife courthouse" I have an important question.. Where can I send fanmail?
/r/MensRights11/10/11 09:22 AM
5

This NUS... http://www.unistudent.com.au/site/index.php?option=com_contact&view=contact&id=2&Itemid=54 Feel free to send them an email. [email protected] I just did.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 11:26 AM
3

Coming from someone who self identifies as a female troll, your accusations are idiotic. Thank you for the clear demonstration of feminist hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 05:01 PM
16

Given her previous articles about "child-men" and young men not "manning up" and becoming suitable husbands for young women, I doubt she's suddenly, completely, changed her viewpoint. However her article "Child-Man in the Promised Land" got a massive amount of criticism, and to her credit she seems to have learnt something from it. Her tone has changed from attacking men for not stepping up to be husbands and providers, to criticising "society" and even women for not giving young men any encoura…
/r/MensRights09/10/11 12:10 PM
8

or dontdatehimgirl.com
/r/MensRights09/10/11 10:41 AM
2

I actually knew many Fijian kids when I was growing up. Mum hitting them with a spatula or broom handle was a weekly occurrence.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 08:40 AM
2

IMO the media pays too much attention to small extremists groups. They say outrageous things that make great headlines. Moderate Islam actually has a lot of values that overlap with conservative Christianity. (faith, family, father as head of house, no premarital sex, no divorce)
/r/MensRights09/10/11 08:16 AM
8

Given that the submission requirements include newspaper articles and/or court records, you are quite correct, the site isn't open to abuse.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 07:34 AM
0

The OP seems to be imputing a bias into Bobsutans comment that is simply not there. That Muslim and Latin cultures tend to reject feminism is merely an observation. As is the fact that both groups have higher growth rates. Take for instance the fact that the most common name for baby boys in Britain is now "Mohamed". The fact is neither good nor bad. But the implication is that in around 18 years Muslims will become a very important voting block in Britain. Given that Muslim children tend to be …
/r/MensRights09/10/11 06:14 AM
33

"And finally it would observe that all of these trends reduce the proportion of "marriageable men," that is, men with steady jobs whom women might want to marry and raise children with.The irony is that the dearth of such men means more single mothers, which in turn means more female poverty and lower income for women." Ah yes, a mans welfare is only important as far as it affects his ability to serve women. I wouldn't have expected any less from Ms Hymowitz. Other than that, its actually a sign…
/r/MensRights09/10/11 05:12 AM
2

I don't know much about it. It's a game show, much like Fear Factor, with physical challenges. I'd guess they have minimum physical requirements. That one test is not really a fair assessment of a female firefighters ability. The door is basically a see-saw that pivots at the bottom. Even a basic understanding of torque tells you that tall heavy people have an advantage. On the other hand, a smart small person could have just climbed it and forced it down using their hands. (Applying all your st…
/r/MensRights09/10/11 02:15 AM
3

Random people for a TV show called "Fort Boyard". (It's based in an old French fort).
/r/MensRights09/10/11 01:38 AM
1

Google translate says its something about a talking pocket called Daura.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 11:29 AM
1

Perhaps idiot was a little excessive, he was certainly smarter than me. But perhaps misguided would be a better term. A lot of his work (and the subsequent work of the Kinsey Institute) seems to be focused on less common sexual practices. His work seems to portray the rare as normal, and the normal as irrelevant. The other thing that bothers me about Kinsey was his seeming lack of ethics. While constraining yourself by conventional ethics and morals would be a problem when trying to research peo…
/r/MensRights08/10/11 06:03 AM
4

Kinsey was an idiot, and you should get an older girlfriend.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 04:45 AM
1

^ This... So much This! Why the hell does this thread have 60+ comments. We all know exactly what it is. Downvote and move on.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 12:39 PM
3

I wonder if there's a law school on campus. I'm sure a few law students would love to file a suit as an extra credit assignment.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 12:31 PM
2

You might want to check that link you posted. http://www.redcrossblood.org/donating-blood/eligibility-requirements/eligibility-criteria-alphabetical-listing#arc5 About three quarters of the way down the page, or just ctrl-f "vCJD" a few times. It repeats the ban on anyone who's spent 3 months in Britain. It's a national guideline. not a state one. I agree that perhaps they should include a question about the number of sexual partners that could be used to make a more realistic assessment of some…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 10:33 AM
2

"You are not eligible to donate if: From January 1, 1980, through December 31, 1996, you spent (visited or lived) a cumulative time of 3 months or more, in the United Kingdom (UK)," http://www.redcrossmichigan.org/guidelines.asp#VariantCreutzfeld-Jacob Even if you're a British vegan, you're still banned. EDIT: For comparison.. "The CDC estimates the cumulative number of deaths of persons with AIDS in the U.S. through 2007 to be 583,298" For vCJD, as far as I can tell there has never been a singl…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 09:15 AM
4

The letter is based on the assumption that all testing is 100% accurate. Its not. 99.9999% is not 100%, not when you're dealing with a disease like AIDS. Secondly, gay men are a relatively small group of potential blood donors, excluding them does not significantly affect the total volume of blood that could be obtained. Accepting donations from gay men poses a plausible risk, with very little benefit. This is a medical decision, not a matter of bigotry. For comparison, I personally am also bann…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 08:29 AM
6

What state are you in? Several clubs in New York, New Jersey and Colorado have been sued over "ladies night". I would think this would legally be quite similar. There are a few lawyers out there who just love suing nightclubs for this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 06:16 AM
2

"....the Taskforce for Action on Violence Within Families ....... ...it refers to murders not killings ..... ....The chance that a female killer of her partner will be convicted of murder is quite small given the compassionate verdicts juries frequently provide for women, whereas men could expect such mercy only when they were truly under immediate threat of death or the evidence suggested strongly that they had no intention to kill. This may have inflated the apparent gender difference and cont…
/r/MensRights06/10/11 09:51 AM
2

When smoking was the primary cause of cancer government launched anti-smoking campaigns and made moves to ban it for our own safety. Will they now be doing the same with oral sex?
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:44 PM
2

If women were vaccinated for HPV this would protect men. Correct? Also, from the article: "Consultants to drug companies that make HPV vaccines are represented among the study’s authors; clearly the companies have an incentive to suggest that males be vaccinated."
/r/MensRights04/10/11 08:48 AM
0

Are you saying being gay is a choice?
/r/MensRights04/10/11 08:42 AM
1

"She argued that it could lead to young couples deciding after having a child that it makes sense for the woman to become the breadwinner – because of her higher earnings potential." Err, no. Because once female hypergamy kicks in all these women are going to want to date and marry a guy who earns more than them. So the wife will still end up earning less than the husband. However it will result in there being a lot less "eligible" bachelors, less marriage, more single motherhood, and more cats.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 11:21 AM
2

Actually I've seen RadFems advocating using IVF to only produce girls, and sex selective abortion to reduce the number of baby boys born. I've even seen them advocating infanticide to reduce the male population. They practically wet themselves with glee when they talk about this news article. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,460166,00.html They don't need to form into groups and hunt men down. They just need to convince other women (single mothers) that boys are undesirable, while supporting …
/r/MensRights01/10/11 08:21 AM
-4

Given that every vaccination has an incredibly small risk, why should young boys be risking their lives for the welfare of women who want to sleep around? For boys, the risk from an HPV vaccination outweighs any good it will do them. This is just more evidence of the disposablity of boys. The main lobby group for vaccinating boys are feminists and the vaccines manufacturer (who will get to sell twice as much of their product).
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:00 PM
1

Fathers and Families is always a good starting point. http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/ Any chance you could tell us what country or state you're in?
/r/MensRights25/09/11 07:05 AM
1

Perhaps you should read his article on Soulja Boy / censorship. He has a better understanding of anarchism than your entire subbredit combined.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:58 PM
2

I don't know American law, but over her you can apply for something called a "non-removal order". Basically a court order that prevents the child being moved to another city, or taken out of the country. (passports can be seized). Maybe Florida has something similar under a different name....
/r/MensRights20/09/11 09:16 PM
1

Early feminists were pretty much split down the middle, take a look at the Pankhurst daughters, Sylvia was anti war and hiding conscientious objectors, while Christabel was intensely pro-war. I believe she said something along the lines of - There's not much point in winning the vote if we lose the war...
/r/MensRights20/09/11 12:11 AM
3

I meant that he should have the children (at least one of them tested). As his childs legal guardian, he does not need his ex's permission to get his own children tested for drugs. In fact he doesn't even need to tell her he had it done. Of course, if the children tested positive for second hand exposure, it would be pretty simple to get the court to force his ex to take a test. He should of course be aware, that his ex will blame him, and demand that he takes a test as well, so he'd better make…
/r/MensRights17/09/11 10:35 PM
1

If he gets caught following his ex, or her boyfriend, thats stalking, and an instant protection/restraining order. That will make his situation ten times worse. He should be able to do basic stuff, like use the guys license plate number to get his full name, check the sex offenders registry, and google him. But if he wants someone to follow him, he should either hire someone, or find an old buddy or family member that owes him a big favour.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 10:10 PM
10

I'm not sure if this would work, but it might be worth you investigating it.... As you know the court can order a hair follicle drug test, which uses a hair sample to test for drug use. Depending on the length of hair, you can sometimes test for drug use as far as 2-3 years previously. Now the odds of actually getting the court to make your ex take a drug test are pretty damn small, and it'd cause all sorts of problems between you. But you can get hair follicle testing done privately, it costs a…
/r/MensRights16/09/11 11:54 PM
6

The interesting thing in the list is that Stephen Fry came in as parents first choice (and at 17% for the students). While the students first choice was Dumbledore (at 24% for the parents). For those of you unaware, both Fry and Dumbledore are gay. I would write some long winded analysis about changes in public perceptions regarding gay men having contact with children... but I'm sure it wouldn't make much sense.... so I'll just say.. its an interesting coincidence.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 07:58 AM
1

You could politely ask what the campus policy is regarding false rape accusations, given as how, y'know 60% of all rape accusations are false? Does the college have a policy of expelling women who make false rape accusations? Will they pursue criminal prosecution? What sort of support services does the college offer to men who have been falsely accused of rape? e.g. Duke, Hostfra, DSK etc etc etc.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 01:23 PM
2

This is specifically about sexual assaults on campus, but I think its relevant. The claim: 1 in 4 women will be sexually assaulted on campus.. t The actual number: 1 in 1877 women http://communityvoices.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/opinion/the-radical-middle/27667--one-in-one-thousand-eight-hundred-seventy-seven So when I hear 1 in 8 women will be raped in their lifetime, I'd guess they're out by at least an order of magnitude.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 09:33 AM
2

You were expecting something worth reading from the goodmanginaproject?
/r/MensRights12/09/11 01:09 PM
1

If forgot to specify, I wasn't talking about US $.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 12:30 PM
13

You could just send your child support checks to your parents house. Ask her to pick them up! Nothing motivates an ex like greed !!
/r/MensRights08/09/11 12:27 PM
5

Indeed, a polygamous society can only be stable if it has a very high death rate for boys/men, historically this has most often been achieved through constant warfare. Any society with large numbers of single young men (with no hope of getting married) will also experience high levels of violent crime. It should be no surprise that in many countries that allow polygamy, women aren't allowed to go out without a male escort. It isn't because they hate women, its because its simply unsafe for a wom…
/r/MensRights08/09/11 12:15 PM
2

Were I to be tasked by some malevolent entity to create an administrative construct or legal framework, for the sole purpose of driving men insane, I doubt I could create anything as effective as the family court system.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 08:33 PM
2

"It is not okay to determine who is the better caregiver based on ability to support the child financially." Why not? What's wrong with judging a parent on their ability to provide food, shelter, warmth, clothing and an education. And what I'm suggesting isn't "richest person wins', all it would do is incentivize negotiation. Currently a separated mother has the child, they have the money, they have everything they want, why would they negotiate? A child having contact with it's father only inco…
/r/MensRights06/09/11 08:17 PM
14

The entire concept of child support should be scrapped. The current purpose of child support is not to support children, but to act as a form of stealth alimony. The current system not only takes away a separated fathers only bargaining chip (financial support), but simultaneously cripples his ability to fight for fair contact and custody by seizing a massive chunk of his income. (Its common for a mans assets and savings to be frozen during a separation, and for those of you who've never hired a…
/r/MensRights06/09/11 01:30 PM
2

Many women seem to revel in this secret little girls club behaviour, feeling superior by excluding men. The biggest problem is when they project the same behaviour onto men, and they come up with absurd ideas like Patriarchy Theory.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 06:48 PM
2

Thanks for all your work kloo.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 08:17 PM
3

I was in a similar situation to Brian, but our local laws are slightly different e.g. The court can force the mother to take a DNA test. Just to give Brian an idea of what he's up against. From the day my lawyer first filed papers, it took 11 months till I next saw my children, and it cost over $10,000. I was given contact of 1 hour per week. My daughter was a similar age to Brians. When I finally got to see her she'd completely forgotten who I was. It's taken years, but I now see them 1 day per…
/r/MensRights28/08/11 08:12 AM
1

Fourty five states have "safe haven" laws that allow women to abandon babies (and young children) "no questions asked". And that's without even discussing adoption.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 05:27 AM
1

The mere fact that they need to produce this disinformation, proves they're scared.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 11:57 AM
2

I'm sure you've already looked, but there are a few Oklahoma fathers support groups listed here, they may not be the right kind of help you need (legal) but they may know who could help. http://www.diyfather.com/directories/global-fathers-support-group-directory About 3/4 of the way down the page, there are some email addresses and contact numbers in Oklahoma. Other than that, there are a few fathers groups listed on this page. http://www.custodysource.com/ok~1.htm I'm not in Oklahoma, so I have…
/r/MensRights26/08/11 10:52 AM
1

One of the problems I've seen with such scenarios is that students are not marked on how well they express their opinion, but on whether they have the correct opinion. The school system has become overly concerned with indoctrination rather than education.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 07:51 AM
1

Where the hell are you getting the number 27 from? Go look at the sidebar of each sub, r/amr r/metaanarchism. They both have ten mods, and at least one of /r/amr is obviously a sock puppet. So they have at least 50% of the same mods, probably more allowing for sock puppets. It would appear that the behaviour of r/amr is supported by the majority of r/metaanarchism. If a small minority of that sub disagree with the behaviour of their subs, they should go where the real anarchists are, r/anarchist…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 08:05 PM
2

I was going to point out that two subs that both have the same five moderators pretty much implies co-operation. I was even going to point out the conversations in r/anachism where they discuss the creation of r/amr. But then I realised theres no point arguing with the wilfully stupid.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 11:26 AM
1

Maybe we could go start a thread in r/anarchism requesting the return of the batman guy. Without him, the quality of the trolling round here has become pathetic.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 11:06 AM
1

She's living the feminists dream, married three times with four kids to four different fathers. Now she's 45 years old, single, all alone, and completely unwanted. Her life's a train wreck.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:53 AM
2

This guy http://www.reddit.com/user/godlessaltruist
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:32 AM
9

Get a lawyer ! From what I have been told, the police will try to question you, and even what seems to you to be exonerating facts, will be used against you. e.g. Just saying that consensual intercourse took place, will be used as an "admission" that part of the complainants story is true. i.e. that penetration occurred.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 09:16 AM
3

War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strenght, Anarchy is Control.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 11:22 PM
1

I was just making the point that he's easily identifiable.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 11:10 PM
1

Have you taken into account the operating cost of the family court? (ie Building costs, judges salary, baliffs wages, police salary, administration etc etc..) The family court sees hundreds of paternity cases daily. Instituting default paternity testing at birth would remove any need for paternity cases later. Paternity testing at birth may actually save the state money.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 11:05 PM
5

Thats a good point, there are lots of genetic diseases that could be tested for at birth. The paternity test could just be incorporated into the same testing process.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 10:51 PM
1

So the "Anarchists" believe they have a right to control the MRM. Fuck Them ! Fuck Them All !
/r/MensRights19/08/11 10:47 PM
16

The "better for society" argument always intrigues me. Surely it's better for society to discourage cheating on your partner. (which is what universal paternity testing would do.)
/r/MensRights19/08/11 12:50 PM
9

The main argument used against it is the cost of the test, which is quite small when you compare all the other costs involved in childbirth. And when you compare it to the cost of raising a child, it's nothing. I personally would like to see some research look at the cost of state funded universal paternity testing, compared to the family court operating costs for all the paternity cases in the same area. The other argument, against compulsory testing, is that it could be considered an illegal s…
/r/MensRights19/08/11 12:47 PM
3

Trolling again? ... minus 566 comment karma Perhaps you should go back to r/circlejerkers
/r/MensRights19/08/11 12:34 PM
4

"redditor for 29 minutes" Why the need for a throwaway account? And how are things in /r/AMR these days?
/r/MensRights19/08/11 12:14 PM
5

Obvious troll is obvious
/r/MensRights19/08/11 10:54 AM
5

"Tragically, violent assaults, homicide and suicide are the second most common cause of death for women workers" http://www.personalinjuryattorneychicagoil.com/2011/05/workplace-accidents-car-crashes-1-cause-of-death-for-women-workers.shtml Basically women are likely to work in places like banks and shops, and they're occasionally hurt or killed during robberies etc. Of course if you look at total numbers of men and women murdered and injured by criminals in the work place, women only make up a …
/r/MensRights19/08/11 06:20 AM
1

try harder
/r/MensRights18/08/11 06:34 AM
1

I'm not really sure how I feel about this. I've definitely got sympathy for the guy, but at the end of the day he was a sperm donor, he knew the deal. He's not a divorced dad, he didn't accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant, he gave his sperm to a lesbian couple so THEY could have a child together. So when he comes out with “It’s a very bad day for fathers, that’s all I can say.” it seems a bit rich. He knew he was just a sperm donor, but unfortunately he chose to become emotionally attached …
/r/MensRights17/08/11 11:54 AM
3

If he'd fingered the right house, she might be facing a murder charge.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 11:25 AM
17

No, it just takes two, but they'd rather live in the dark and blame the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 01:27 PM
1

Look I'm not trying to be an ass about this, but you really need to understand a bit about local culture. If you go out to the clubs any Friday or Saturday night, you'll find groups of young guys, hanging around outside, getting drunk, looking for an excuse to pick a fight and show what a big man they are to the ladies. The way the bouncer acted in this video was thuggish, yet celebrated as heroic. There are definitely young men who will see this and try to emulate it. Not because they want to b…
/r/MensRights12/08/11 08:01 AM
1

They've also reposted the video on youtube with comments and voting disabled, and changed the link on the website to the new video.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 07:50 AM
3

The problem is that some immature wannabe white knight thug is going to see this, and get the message.. "...If you see a couple, and the woman looks drunk, don't bother asking any questions, just run up and beat the shit out of the guy, and drag the woman away... It's ok, the police video said this is what you should do!...." Better hope they're not a married couple out celebrating their anniversary.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:36 AM
6

Didn't you know, your sole purpose in life should be to run around saving drunk women from their own stupidity.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 08:00 PM
7

But the "mysogynist" MRA's want to "oppress" a woman by buying her a house, making babies with her, loving her till death do us part, and occasionally asking her to cook dinner & vacuum. Misandrist feminists want gender based apartheid, and the male population culled to lest than 10% You're trying to compare I love Lucy to the Holocaust! EDIT: Since this post has been linked to, I'd like to explain that the idea of reducing the male population to 5%-10% is a common meme among radical feminists. …
/r/MensRights11/08/11 07:54 PM
7

That was the main thing that stood out for me in this video, the woman's lack of agency. I think its fair to say that the video objectifies women. She is an object, that other people act on. She has no free will or independent thought of her own, she's just a body that people drag and push around. When you think about it, the video is pretty damn insulting to women.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 07:31 PM
11

It also endangers men who go out for a few drinks with their girlfriends. i.e If you see a guy with a woman who looks drunk, feel free to attack him.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 07:15 PM
6

Here's the youtube link. (I stuffed up the posting.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUj2OHLAG3w
/r/MensRights11/08/11 11:51 AM
-1

You could just check his comment history. He look pretty legit to me. "Redditor for 3 months". And most of his postings are work related. I know Againstmensrights are annoying, but this is actually the aim of their constant trolling, to try to stop us helping other men.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 05:33 AM
2

Do you seriously not get it, or are you being intentionally obtuse. Chess, is a purely intellectual competition. It's the one sport where men and women should be able to compete on an equal footing. The mere existence of women only chess competitions, seems to imply that the women involved either demand special treatment based on their gender, or they believe they are intellectually inferior to men, and therefore unable to compete on an equal footing. So which is it? Are these women selfish or s…
/r/MensRights11/08/11 05:25 AM
2

"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation." - Mein Kampf. I agree with you. Parents should be treated with respect and dignity as human beings. The family court uses this "best interest of the child" BS as an excuse to trample over peoples (most often fathers) most basic human rights.…
/r/MensRights07/08/11 12:27 PM
2

It's been cross posted to /daddit http://www.reddit.com/r/daddit/comments/jasrw/how_not_to_screw_up_the_conversation_about_the/
/r/MensRights07/08/11 12:16 PM
1

There are TWO types of Paternity tests. The first only requires DNA samples from the father and the child. They look at the about 19 specific genes on each sample. The child should have about half the genes the same as the father. It gives a very rough indication whether or not the guy is the father. It's often called a "peace of mind test". Its completely worthless in court. The second kind requires DNA samples from the child, the father, and the MOTHER. The 19 gene sequences are identified in …
/r/MensRights07/08/11 11:55 AM
1

I agree that the court doesn't really care about "the best interests of the the child". But that's how the game is played! You don't say "I want to spend more time with my son because I love him". You say "I believe it would be in his best interest to have a stable and reliable male figure in his life".
/r/MensRights05/08/11 09:48 AM
3

I don't know how you do things over there, but over here the court often appoints a "Lawyer for Child", to speak to the child, and represent their views in court. To be honest, most of the time they act like the mothers second lawyer, but once in a while you get a decent one. If the court does appoint one, kiss her ass. ( and yes it will be a her, lawyers for child are female 95%+) Be perfect, never express any form of anger or frustration, express every opinion or request as "I believe its in m…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 09:10 AM
1

http://www.mypointless.com/2010/08/man-falls-into-toilet-pit-for-two-days.html
/r/MensRights01/08/11 08:03 AM
9

Quite a fascinating read, thanks for the link. Best quote: "Members of the jury later revealed that one holdout, named Helen Hubbard, had announced to them in private that she would vote guilty "until hell freezes over" and that she refused to discuss the evidence, look at the exhibits, or read the trial transcripts. .... It was also revealed that Hubbard and her mother-in-law were members of the first California Regent of the Daughters of the American Revolution, hard-line feminists who were cl…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 10:59 PM
7

This is how I call it discrimination. http://www.transport.govt.nz/research/Documents/Young-driver-crash-fact-sheet-2010.pdf I know its from New Zealand not the UK, but look at the difference between male and female drivers 15-19. Yes, young men are the most dangerous drivers, but they only have about 30% more accidents than female drivers of a similar age. Then look at his insurance prices, young male drivers are being charged over 400% more than female drivers the same age.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 04:10 PM
3

Fox news are usually a bunch of socon white knights, telling guys to "man up", and crack down on those deadbeat dads. They're opposed to the MRM almost as much as feminists. The article isn't about mens reproductive rights, its just a conservative who's found a new angle to write an anti-abortion opinion piece.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 04:16 PM
2

There is real possibility that the US government could institute a draft in the near future. Budget cuts may force them to reduce military pay and benefits which would cause recruitment problems.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 03:32 PM
4

The guy who wrote this article works for Fox News, he's not an MRA.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 03:17 PM
4

Ashton Kutchers latest "celebrity cause de jour" is underage sex trafficking. He's been using his high profile to make all sorts of blatantly false statements eg the 100k-300k figure. The Village Voice called him out as being full of shit He then started a vendetta against the paper getting some of their advertisers to pull funding. At least that's what I remember of the incident. I could be wrong on a few details.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 02:58 PM
1

Where did I say "heteronormative pigeon-holing"? Stop putting words in my mouth. "I'd already quoted your reply, didn't matter that it was deleted by the time I posted mine." What are you going on about??
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:09 PM
1

Have you considered going to the embassy and punching one of the officials that wont help you? The embassy is American territory. And I'd guess a crime occurring on American territory, between two American citizens should be tried in an American court of law, in front of an American judge. If you're not sure, you could ask the embassy official before you punch them.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:59 PM
0

I just had a look through the "survey". Whoever wrote it has no interest in understanding mens rights issues, but does seem keen on trying to pigeonhole /menrights members, as you suggest. The questions were clearly written by a feminist, you can tell by the wording. Eg. "Question 1) What gender do you most closely identify with?" The options are male / female / transgender.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:03 PM
6

Rather interestingly, the white supremacists went off and formed their own subreddit, and then started banning a whole lot of regular commenters from /mensrights without any of us ever commenting in their subreddit. You're doing exactly what the white supremacists did!
/r/MensRights20/07/11 03:41 PM
2

Its funny as hell, but its also kind of sad. It's also a perfect example of what happens when you let a feminist have a little bit of authority. And why feminists are unfit to work in government.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 03:35 PM
-5

"we are working on integrating the list into a browser extension" How many feminists do you know of that are capable of writing a "browser extension"? Heck, most of them probably couldn't even install one. Programming isn't part of a womyns studies course.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 02:40 PM
16

Yay! Does that mean we can all start a dozen sock puppet accounts and come play on your subreddit? You don't understand how the internet works do you?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:45 PM
1

You could talk to the local police, and ask what crime you should commit to get yourself deported.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 12:43 PM
5

Hey Kloo, do you remember in another thread where I said if you identify yourself as "anti" in the motto, you'll be dismissed as "reactionary". From the wiki page: "The men's rights movement is a backlash against some of the advances made by feminism"
/r/MensRights16/07/11 09:04 AM
8

Yep arguing with feminists is largely pointless. Unless you're doing it in a neutral location, with an audience.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 08:57 AM
9

There's more to the MRM than anti-feminism. For a start many social conservatives advocate for policies or attitudes that directly harm men. e.g. The Draft, or "women and children first". Both of which pre-date feminism, and even the woman's suffrage movement. Or are you intending to limit the scope of this subreddit to purely anti-feminist topics? Also, by defining yourself (and us) as "anti" anything, you give up control. You allow those that opposed you to set the agenda. You become "reaction…
/r/MensRights15/07/11 10:24 AM
2

When I'm looking at that campaign, why do I get the feeling the men are victims of domestic violence?
/r/MensRights14/07/11 11:21 AM
1

Have you considered surrogacy? From what I have read, it can often be cheaper and easier than adoption, and the child will be biologically yours. A google search for "surrogacy in India" indicates you can get it done for $22k - $35. http://www.medicaltourismco.com/assisted-reproduction-fertility/low-cost-surrogacy-india.php?gclid=CKPt5PHs_akCFYw-pAodig9vxw I'm sure you could find a better deal if you shop around. I've heard $10k mentioned by some people. Whereas adoptions can cost up to $30k.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:09 AM
4

I don't see any problem with extending a right to leave to men who know they aren't the child's father. How many guys have started relationships with solo mothers, and because they were decent guys they spent time with the kids, took them fishing, helped with homework. But when the relationship ended, they got hit for child support, because they "acted as a parent". Men are being financially penalised for being kind to children.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 09:27 AM
5

Fake names and phone numbers are just a form of birth control. They're used to prevent unwanted paternity. Rather than criticize the guys who are force to lie to protect themselves, surely it would be better to advocate for reproductive rights for men.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 09:16 AM
1

You know "The Prince" was written as satire, right?
/r/MensRights09/07/11 02:34 AM
2

What I find disturbing, is that they apparently expect male teachers to act as substitutes for the fathers that have been forced out of their childrens lives.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 02:06 AM
0

Less than 1% of breast cancer patients are male.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 08:31 AM
45

You may notice when people are killed, hurt, or in danger, women are referred to as "women". Men are only refereed to by their occupation. Do you remember the Chilean MINERS that were trapped? What about the SAILORS that died on the Kursk submarine? How about the OFFICE WORKERS trapped after the earthquake? Or the TECHNICIANS working on the Fukishima nuclear plant. The media seem to go out of their way to avoid mentioning that men as a gender exist (except when they're bad). Apparently a mans va…
/r/MensRights07/07/11 11:54 AM
14

Many of the issues in the MRM are so controversial, Hollywood wouldn't dare touch them with a ten foot barge pole. However comedy movies do give producers and directors a backdoor to bring up controversial issues. You shouldn't always assume that every topic referenced in a comedy movie, is done so purely to denigrate. The example you give above, getting put on the sex offenders registry for peeing in a playground is one such example. It would be pretty hard for a serious drama to bring up the i…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:47 AM
1

Evidently the creator of this site doesn't understand basic human psychology, or why the majority of women sign up for online dating services. Most women are poorly equipped to deal with rejection.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 01:32 AM
5

Feminism is a hate movement. http://www.avoiceformen.com/2011/05/22/is-feminism-a-hate-movement/ Feminism is a doctrine of violence. http://www.avoiceformen.com/2011/01/18/feminism-is-a-doctrine-of-violence/ Edit: Feminism has never been about equality. Are you really demanding that we agree with your lies before you'll listen to us?
/r/MensRights04/07/11 12:53 AM
2

Do you think that the results are going to convince them that they're bigots, and they'll all decide to stop supporting feminism? I don't see what you're trying to achieve... They'll just wiggle out of it and say it wasn't a fair test, or they'll just ignore you because you're a guy, and therefore wrong. And when you say "look it proves I'm right", a whole load of other people will shout "confirmation bias". But, if you are going to do it, can't you just cross post to multiple subreddits and com…
/r/MensRights02/07/11 01:54 AM
5

"If the average distance to the moon is 394,400 km, South African women together walk the equivalent of a trip to the moon and back 16 times a day to supply their households with water " LOLWut? Let me see, assuming this BS is true. (394,000km x 16 times a day) / 25 million (female population of SA = 250 Metres each. (On average.) So lets imagine 6 women, one poor woman walks 1.4 km per day to get water. The other five walk 20 metres (from the bedroom to the kitchen sink). Average for all six...…
/r/MensRights01/07/11 10:42 AM
2

I doubt gay men would want to downplay the importance of biological parentage. Many gay men have children from prior relationships with women (particularly those that came out later in life). And the majority want to be involved in their childrens lives. On the other hand, lesbian couples often choose to have children using sperm donors they know. There are many stories of gay sperm donors who wish to have contact with the children they have fathered, and lesbian couples trying to prevent that c…
/r/MensRights01/07/11 10:00 AM
1

It was created by a KKK leader called Don Black (seriously).
/r/MensRights01/07/11 09:54 AM
1

I'd suggest you contact this guy and let him know you'd be willing to act as a witness should he choose to take her to small claims court. (Assuming you're willing to do this.) Do not use your phone to log into her facebook account again, and don't ever tell anyone you did it. Using your phone to access her facebook account is illegal, and its pretty easy for the police to trace an IP address back to your phone. As AnnArchist says. feminists love using the law as a weapon to attack men.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 11:35 AM
2

If you want a movement thats only interested in helping white, straight, males. There already is one. Its called White Nationalism. And its a dead end movement thats achieved nothing, and is going nowhere. Of course, you already knew that, thats why white nationalist keep trying to latch on to the MRM.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 11:20 AM
1

Feminism was never "co-opted", its been a hate movement since its inception.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 09:51 AM
-2

Yeah, our kiwi women are real classy.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 07:31 AM
2

I hate to be an ass, but women getting away with perjury in the family court is so common we barely bother mentioning it. Have you tried contacting Glenn Sacks? http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/?page_id=1274
/r/MensRights23/06/11 10:33 AM
1

Go back a few generations, and you'll see that even the richest man only got to have one wife, and they were together "till death". Most women stayed virgins until marriage, or at least kept their partner count low and were discreet about it. And sex outside of marriage was frowned on, or outright forbidden. Fast forward to modern feminist raunch culture and you'll see that wealthy men have incredibly easy access to sex with as many women as they want. You might be interested in reading Roissy t…
/r/MensRights23/06/11 06:50 AM
1

I never said it was. But we're not gonna get the CIA to fund a "Mr." magazine, and we're not gonna get the Rockerfeller foundation to sponsor us. We can't just sit around and wait for the cavalry to show up.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 06:33 AM
3

Short version.. Lower marriage rates mean less women qualify for the spouse or widows social security allowance. Then they quote the wage gap myth a few times to say that women will get less social security than men. Their conclusion: Women are being disadvantaged by divorcing their husbands, we should give them more money. Best quote from the report: "Efforts to increase the widow benefit usually involve giving less money to a couple while the husband is alive and then more to the widow once he…
/r/MensRights23/06/11 06:01 AM
1

Reading this post made me nauseous. http://feministteacher.com/2011/03/29/teaching-boys-feminism/
/r/MensRights22/06/11 12:27 PM
1

If you're waiting for some rich guy to come riding in to fund the MRM, you'll be waiting a long time. Really wealthy men actually benefit from feminism (lots of sex) and are insulated from many of its worst effects (billionaires don't get jailed for unpaid child support). And for any owner of a large business, publicly/financially supporting mens, or even fathers rights could be very risky from a public relations standpoint. You don't see McDonalds picking sides in the abortion debate, likewise …
/r/MensRights22/06/11 11:25 AM
2

Well done finding that. It confirms what I've suspected about her motivations.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 08:13 AM
2

Thats quite insightful.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 04:35 AM
5

I was a kid in the UK in the 80's, I remember it was all through the media, that girls needed to be helped, it was on TV, in the newspaper. But most of the drive didn't come from government passing laws, it was from women running teacher training colleges, they were referencing dodgy studies and then making changes to the way teachers taught their classes. In the late 80's the paedophile paranoid scared all the men out of teaching, leaving the women to set the curriculum, to choose which books t…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 01:28 PM
3

I personally get the impression that Ozymandis's concern for men is little more that a 19yr olds passing fancy... that she's more interested in being seen to care, than actually caring.. Maybe its because she's young, but she just doesn't get it, like a ten year old who's read a book about driving, and is trying to tell you how to do it. As for the rest of the contributors... I've read articles from about half of them, they don't get it either. They're all upper middle class, living in feminist …
/r/MensRights21/06/11 12:10 PM
3

"The only real problem with Ozymandias’ piece is that she has a naïve understanding of what feminism is really about." http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/06/11/feminist-weltschmerz/
/r/MensRights21/06/11 11:24 AM
5

"it's obvious that the concern for men and the advocacy for men's rights here are genuine.".... Really ? It comes across to me as teh girlz getting together to tell men what the issues in the mens rights movement should be. They've finally figured out that MRM won't be silenced with criticism, so they're trying to throw men a few crumbs to shut them up. "look we're being nice, now shut up and obey!"
/r/MensRights21/06/11 11:14 AM
2

Anarchism.... by "enlarging state control"... hmmmm I'm fascinated. I'm going to go have a look at the subreddit now.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 10:11 AM
0

Given that feminism requires massive amounts of financial and legal support from the state, how the hell does Anarcha Feminism work? (Somehow I've got a feeling that any explanation is going sound more like communism than anarchism.)
/r/MensRights21/06/11 09:02 AM
4

"They didn't do it on purpose" Actually they did do it on purpose. Back in the 80's there was a concerted effort to remodel the entire education system. The curriculum, teaching styles, even little things like class seating arrangements, were all changed for the sole purpose of improving girls performance in school. For any educated person (such as .... errr....a teacher) its obvious that making such wholesale changes for the benefit of one specific group would logically affect other groups pres…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 08:41 AM
1

The date on the story says 12/06/2010 Its over a year old.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 11:25 AM
1

Have you watched Get Him To The Greek? Male rape is still a comedy trope.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 05:57 AM
4

You cant see the conflict between being in favour of permanently cutting up and mutilating a childs genitals with knife, while complaining that a slap is horrific abuse? Evidently your rationalization hamster is running at full speed.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 12:30 PM
0

Try looking up MRA on Urban Dictionary. I love the bit where MRA's are compared to the KKK. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mra
/r/MensRights15/06/11 01:25 PM
3

Glenn Sacks is definitely a good starting point. I know you're primary concern is your financial situation, but you mentioned abuse, so it might be worth contacting SAVE (Stop Abusive and Violent Environments.) http://www.saveservices.org/victims-and-survivors/ They are male friendly, and may be able to direct you to male friendly support near you.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 07:05 AM
6

But to get people to volunteer to get shot at you have to pay them quite well. When you use the draft you can pay minimum wage.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 06:33 AM
1

Where abouts are you? If you're in the UK check out Angry Harry. http://www.angryharry.com/
/r/MensRights13/06/11 12:37 PM
3

No need to be so defeatist. Ten years ago... The mere idea of Americans questioning the sense of circumcision was pure fantasy. Dads asking for 50/50 care of their kids... absurd. Men publicly criticising feminism... suicide. You've got to remember, feminism has been running for more than 50 years. We're not going to destroy it overnight. The wheels of government turn slowly, and government policy usually lags behind public opinion. This is gonna be a long fight.. but good one.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 12:33 PM
1

I'm not in the US, but the basic principle is this.. A large number of feminist organisations such as domestic violence shelters (and their anti-male lobbying) are reliant on government funding. Governments also fund many departments, agencies and programmes, (VAWA, employment laws, the feminist run education system, welfare.) that are feminist inspired, and use mens tax money to give preferential treatment to women. In short, big government is feminist government. When you cut government spendi…
/r/MensRights13/06/11 12:21 PM
6

Hypocrite? At what point did he ask for preferential treatment? Never. Just as he never asked for discrimination and bigotry. Men just want fair treatment.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 11:57 AM
7

At least he's honest about it, unlike so many women who get preferential treatment and complain about being oppressed at the same time.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 10:28 AM
1

Women like you don't get to define what it is to be a man. Your opinion is worthless. Go back to your hole
/r/MensRights13/06/11 10:20 AM
1

If FGM in Africa is a feminist issue for women in America/Europe, then I'm quite sure murdering babies is a Mens Rights issue. But in purely practical terms, we're too small right now, we need to look after our own back yard.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 12:56 AM
5

In China, the men work, the women work, the grandparents parent.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 11:10 PM
2

Unfortunately I've seen radical feminists holding this up as an example of female empowerment. The same sort of Rad-fems that believe mens numbers should be "culled to manageable levels" think male targeted infanticide is a wonderful method of achieving their goals.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:45 PM
1

Exactly. With our current system you're forced to pay child support, with no corresponding requirement for contact. Then you're forced to pay again for a lawyer, so you can take your chances in family court. You're already paying (twice), but with no guaranteed result. I genuinely believe child support should be scrapped, men have no reproductive rights, so they should have no corresponding responsibilities. Also giving men control over how much financial support they give their child's mother, …
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:15 PM
3

I agree, the very concept of child support should be scrapped. If a woman can't support a child on her own, custody should be given to the father. If she wants a fathers financial assistance, then perhaps she should consider negotiating a fair contact agreement with the father in exchange for his financial support. I understand some people might be offended at the idea of paying to see your children, but it would produce a more equitable outcome that our current systems.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 07:25 PM
2

Farrell seems kind of out of place alongside the spiritual healers and astrologers, has he explained his motivation for taking part?
/r/MensRights07/06/11 11:01 AM
4

The problem is that most journalist in the main stream media are too lazy to do any research. They'll take a 5 minute look at this conference, then do 1 minute puff piece about "The Mens Movement". Can you imagine what The Colbert Report could do with this summit. And you're average guy in the street goes away thinking "the mens movement" is a load of flaky new age hippies, and sycophantic goddess worshippers.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 12:44 PM
6

Any mens summit featuring Gay Hendricks, of the Dear Women video, is a (wo)mens summit. They are taking live phone calls throughout the event. Paul Elam is suggesting that the MRM should troll them mercilessly. http://www.avoiceformen.com/2011/06/05/choice-for-men-compassion-for-men/ This could be epic!
/r/MensRights06/06/11 11:58 AM
2

Not meaning to flog a dead horse, but what about asking for her friends name and address, then posting a check directly to her. (Or bank account number.) Nothing breaks up a friendship like money. :-) You could then demand a receipt from the friend before you send any more money. As an added bonus you could then subtly enquire whether she'll be listing this as secondary income with the IRS... Regarding California childcare laws.."You don't need a license if you care for your children (or those o…
/r/MensRights04/06/11 01:41 AM
5

I pay my daughters kindergarten myself (via bank transfer), then send my her mother a copy of the receipts to prove I have paid. Not only can I be sure where the money is going, my ex can't complain that I'm "forcing her to jump through hoops", because I'm doing all the work. As an additional bonus, you get to talk to the childcare provider, they may even involve you by sending copies of reports and newsletters to you via email. You get to be more involved in your childs life. The only complaint…
/r/MensRights04/06/11 12:34 AM
2

Men don't avoid seeing a doctor because they're too embarrassed to ask for help. They neglect to see a doctor because they're too busy looking after everyone else in their life. And because weakness repels women.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 12:09 AM
8

But calling for more reasonable punishments for sex offences will get you nowhere. You'll be accused of being a rape apologist or worse. But a call for equality is a hard thing to argue against. Step1: Force judges to punish girls as harshly as boys. Step2: Watch the feminists backtrack when they realise their policies are hurting girls.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 11:52 PM
3

I've never, ever heard of an adoption agency giving a child to a single male. Even single women have problems. Do you really think anyone would give a little girl or boy to a man in our current paedophile paranoia climate? If you want to be a solo parent, and you're willing to pay, surrogacy is probably a better option. I've read in a few places that you can get it done in India for under $10K. Not only is the child genetically yours, you can use donor eggs so the genetic mother will be anonymou…
/r/MensRights02/06/11 07:57 AM
1

What about "ad-opting out"?
/r/MensRights01/06/11 10:56 AM
3

I'm actually in New Zealand, and have been reading about this for weeks/months. The boys were mostly students at an expensive private boarding school, and were aged 13-16 years old when this started. The guy may be 21 years old now, but its been going on for years. It seems like her main goal was that she just enjoys messing with peoples heads (she seems slightly unbalanced.). She's also managed to extract a fair amount of money from these boys, via their parents credit cards etc. (eg The "hot g…
/r/MensRights31/05/11 07:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter