TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

worldiest Archive

View 0 posts and 82 comments by worldiest on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Angry? No, no. On the contrary, I almost burst out laughing at work. Sorry my girly, emotional woo woo brain can't be rational and logical enough for a Google expert bro like you. Peace.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 07:10 PM
0

Oooohh a Huffington Post article? That is big news. I think they also spend a lot of time talking about Lindsay Lohan. It looks like the book caused quite a stir and wasn't embraced in many feminist circles. Besides, it looks like most of the criticism of the book stems from the fact that it's not based in reality and, like so many other media outlets, misrepresents women. I'd expect that coming from the former editor in chief of Cosmo, which is not exactly the authority on gender issues. ad inf…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:37 PM
1

1962 Yeah, way to cherry-pick one nut job 51 years ago. I have never heard of her. If you want to know more about how gender is represented in the media, there are about 25,000 books that you can choose from
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:32 PM
1

The fact of the matter? Haha. It seems to me that your opinion of women is rooted mostly in 90s sitcoms and romcom movies. And which gender writes the vast majority of those movies?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:18 AM
1

Well, I actually kind of like Marxism and anarchism after having studied it, but that's another conversation. :) But no, I believe people should express their sexuality however they like as long as they're not hurting anyone, and I don't believe that the world would be better off without men.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:40 PM
1

And here is where I sort of don't know how to respond. You may feel like this is a cop-out, but it is what it is. My feminist beliefs come mostly from academia and anthropology, so I view feminism as more of a mindset rather than a definitive group of people. I don't follow figureheads or leaders. Apart from key historical figures, I couldn't name one contemporary feminist thought leader off the top of my head. I listen to ideas and form my own opinion. So the only thing that I can provide on th…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 04:34 PM
1

It might seem like a lot of false rape accusation talk now, but I would expect it to cycle out eventually as people get tired of discussing the topic over and over. Given what I know about reddit, you may have a point there. Sometimes I can't tell the difference between reddit and tabloids. executive director of the Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton Lol, dude. Politicians and the like are so fucking out of touch. Do you know how many assholes in politics have made idiotic comments about women? I…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 04:04 PM
1

I don't want to see women's issues on the forum. I want to see important men's issues, like male rape and the fact that boys are encourage to be emotional automatons in our culture. Is that so much to ask? Let's definitely not open the can of worms that is the existence of patriarchy. Good call. Nothing short of waking up and realizing that I actually have been living in the matrix and existing as nothing but a battery for my robot overlords will change my mind about that. While I've seen you gu…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 03:25 PM
1

When did I ever say that they never happen? I provided data that says they do happen, just not as often as you think. Look, we've resorted to bickering here. My original intention was to help you guys realize that it's not as common as you might have first assumed. I suspect, although I don't know for sure, that you thought the issue was more prevalent than it was. People who are falsely accused deserve empathy and attention, but you have to admit, you have to admit, that it's out of balance on …
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:41 PM
1

Of course I comprehended your point. My counterpoint is that unlike false rape accusations, both of those issues are actual problems in society. It's not that male rape is more important than false rape accusations. It's that, of the two issues, it's the only thing that actually actually affects a significant portion of the population. False rape accusations aren't unimportant because there are worse issues out there. They're unimportant because the rarity of them makes them negligible. Do you g…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:14 PM
1

"Why are you bothering with issue X, when issue Y is a much bigger problem?" "You can't campaign against slut walks in the West, women in the Middle East can't even show their faces!" Both of these issues are serious problems. Sexual dehumanization has been linked to not only depression and mental illness, but also direct victimization. Things are worse for Middle Eastern women, so it's a problem that should get more attention. But both of these issues are vastly more endemic than false rape acc…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:12 AM
1

So your entire argument is that it's not as rare as some other things, so therefore it's the biggest issue ever? this just points at the general absurdity an hypocrisy of this entire movement. rather than focus on the myriad of issues that actually affect men, such as male rape, you choose to play on peoples fundamental distrust of women and blow a non issue out of proportion. it just further proves that this is a movement that is anti woman rather than Pro men. I don't even know why I engaged. …
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:27 PM
1

The second quote was a counterpoint to your calculation, and frankly it doesn't really relate to my central point. That data was simply to show that there are more pressing issues than false rape allegations. The two figures, as you so astutely pointed out, are unrelated, but they were never intended to be related. And the 136 number was based on the study that shows that 17% of women surveyed by the CDC have been raped, so it's a moot point anyway. You can't dispute the .125%, however, unless y…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:01 PM
1

RAINN says it's closer to 50%. I'd like to see a source there, because that doesn't sound right. All studies I've seen have put the rate of reporting at 15-20% So you admit it could be much higher than 8% false. No, unfounded means that the police could find no evidence of a crime. The number is likely lower, not higher. True, but most gunshots are suicides. One can prevent those rather easily. The figure I used actually excluded suicides. Nor are random serial rapists preying on strangers, does…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:48 PM
1

Did you read what I wrote? That number was the number of rapes reported to the police by women against men. That is the figure. I'm not assuming that. That is what it is. It follows that about 3% of those are probably false allegations. Does that makes sense? Ask any feminist you meet whether people who make false accusations should be prosecuted. They would vehemently agree that they should. However, this is what shouldn't be happening: the hype. There's a perception among a lot of MRAs that fa…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:25 PM
0

Provided above.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:47 AM
0

Okay, I'm back and can now debate! You haven't included your sources. I know, I know. I'll try to include them going forward. A quick look at the quasi-judicial hearings being done on post secondary campuses in the US shows this assumption to be patently false. You're right about that. I didn't take that into account. And I don't think there are reliable statistics surrounding that. On the other side of the issue college campuses have been known to cover up instances of rape, so I think it's jus…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:32 AM
-1

You're confusing the per year numbers with lifetime numbers. Statistics show that one in six women will experience rape in her lifetime. I'll respond later when I'm not on my phone and I can actually go back and verify the calculations. Most of my sources are the FBI.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:05 PM
1

Haha I have never heard of a lefty MRA, but I'll take your word for it. Given that one in six women experience either rape or attempted rape in their lifetimes, compared to one in 33 men, I would say that a little white lie is a good trade off if it avoids a potentially aggressive or dangerous situation. Those are the facts, and that is my logic. Its not that I lie to everyone who hits on me. The vast majority of the time I'm perfectly nice. but as soon as I get that little hint of aggression or…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:35 PM
3

It's a little different between the sexes, though, I would say. Although it's never happened to me personally, a lot of my friends have had situations where guys, after being rejected, will wait for them outside of the bar. It's more than just annoying. It's a potentially dangerous situation. Being non-confrontational is actually a method of self-preservation, and I would argue that it's the smart choice when you're dealing with a complete stranger. By no means am I saying that all guys or even …
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:17 PM
3

Or maybe I'm just not afraid to readily admit that I don't know these things for sure. I can only guess. Why do you think a guy who harasses me (and I mean harassment, not just talking me up) at a bar constantly will back off suddenly when I mention a boyfriend? I'm curious.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:30 PM
3

How dare you! My fictional boyfriend would never hurt anyone! But no, this is just what I'm guessing is his reasoning.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:05 PM
2

I'm actually not assuming anything. I'm just repeating the author of the article. I said later on that I think the real reason that someone would be so disrespectful and then back off suddenly at the mention of a boyfriend is because he's afraid of getting his ass kicked.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 06:47 PM
-3

Okay, let me lay down some logic for you guys here. (Logic?? From a feminist?? Never!!) In the US, in 2008, there were estimated to be about 90,000 rapes of both men and women. 90,000 About 20% of those rapes, if we're being generous, were reported to the police. 90,000 x 0.2 = 18,000 rape accusations About 8% of rape accusations are unfounded. This, again, is being generous, because "unfounded" does not necessarily mean that no rape occurred. But 8% works in your favor, so we'll use that. 18,00…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 06:34 PM
2

That's really terrible. It sounds like you were a victim of sexual assault, or at least extreme harrassment. I know how that feels, and I'm sorry that happened.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:44 PM
2

You've heard plenty of guys talk about that. Super convincing. Anyway, like I said, even if it were true, it doesn't mean that these women are showing the "girlfriend" or "wife" respect as a person with feelings.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:32 PM
2

Besides the fact that I'm pretty sure "girl logic" doesn't work that way, I don't see how this is respectful to his girlfriend as a person. Respecting someone's opinion and respecting them can be two different things.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:11 PM
3

Do you have experience with this? If we're going with the author's theory, maybe this is because some women don't respect the value of other women the way men respect the value of other men? You know the more I think about it, I would guess that the real reason "I have a boyfriend" works is because these assholes are more afraid of getting their asses kicked by my fictional boyfriend than getting their feelings hurt by me.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:36 PM
8

I've actually experienced this at a bar a few times, though. A guy will come up to me a little tipsy and start being really touchy and domineering. I say, "I'm not interested," multiple times. He typically just sees this as a challenge to try harder. Then I pull the "I have a boyfriend," card, and he backs off. It looks like the author of the article has posited a theory that guys will back off at this point out of respect for my fictional boyfriend, rather than out of respect for me. Of course …
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:55 PM
3

It may not be murder, but it's certainly assault and possibly attempted murder of the mother. You don't see the difference between forcing an abortion and choosing an abortion?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:44 PM
1

You're still bickering with me. Sorry, I just don't feel like this is worth my time. In this instance I wanted us both to learn something from each other, but you don't seem open to it. I do appreciate your third to last paragraph, I guess. My response to you is that, yes, everything is technically biological. Even cultural processes are biological. The question is whether they are genetically inherited. But that's not really what I was asking. I wasn't asking the difference between men and wome…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:52 PM
1

I never studied feminism in the Women's Studies department. I studied it in the Anthropology department, so I can't really speak on interdepartmental politics. And about 60% of my feminist anthropology classes talked about how Feminist theory applies to various power structures. Women, are the only group that has been universally disenfranchised in every culture throughout history (with the exception of very recent trends in the Western world). Just from a scientific perspective, that's a mind-b…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:35 PM
1

Your response is very sparse and quippy. Could you elaborate on your claim that feminism has co-opted patriarchy? How so? I'm really not that up to speed on theories of matriarchy, so I don't think I can comment on that here. What I can explain to you is the use of feminist theory as a paradigm for explaining other social phenomena. I firmly believe that this is not about men vs. women, and that feminism does not necessarily equal women's rights, although on the surface it may seem that way. It'…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:10 PM
-1

While I agree that most people in today's world are disenfranchised in one shape or form (some more than others), I think it's simplistic to lump all genders into a single experience. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to think that patriarchy is a feminist concept. This is incorrect. In fact, it's a very old scientific term in anthropology used to describe societies that systematically place men at the top of a social hierarchy. All known societies (except maaayybe the Iroquois) are patriarc…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:48 PM
1

I always thought this was pretty funny. This is also one of my favs.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:21 PM
-1

Actually, patriarchy oppresses men as well. This is a common feminist argument.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:56 PM
1

You say strawman but then you hypocritically bring up the old straw feminist. Show me one example where a feminist has advocated against personal safety. How many raped involve large amounts of alcohol? I would go further but it would be victim blaming Please do go further. I'd be curious to hear your logic.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 01:12 PM
0

It sounds like you're missing the point. Trust me, every woman knows what it is like to live with the threat of attack on a daily basis. It may not be a conscious fear all of the time, but it does police our behavior. OF COURSE we're going to do what we can (within reason) to prevent it from happening. I carry pepper spray with me whenever I go out alone, even during the daytime. I've received threats from strangers walking by on numerous occasions. I'm assuming you're a man and therefore have n…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:53 PM
1

It also says that men commit more sexual violence. I'd also like to see exactly how they phrased the questions.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 07:53 PM
1

People say that line all the time, and it's hot as fuck, especially when it's in that thick, primal voice right in my ear. You're confirming my suspicion that you're probably a little inexperienced.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:12 PM
1

There are other ways to obtain consent that aren't as absurd as what you described. I wonder if you've ever had sex, because I have never in my life slept with someone with absolutely no communication. Here's a sexy way to get consent: "Tell me how much you want it, baby." It's a huge turn-on, and it removes any ambiguity. Problem solved. Happy sexing.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 05:42 AM
0

Because as a human, my reaction to someone basically telling me that they don't trust me because of my gender is to feel hurt and distance myself from those people. It's not up to me to change someone's deep psychological issues. Been there, done that. Sure, I pity them on some level, but they have to deal with their own problems. Oh, and when I said the feminist part of me, I guess I meant the idealistic part.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 08:49 PM
0

Have you researched to try and answer that question objectively?
/r/MensRights27/07/13 08:39 PM
0

I told you that I know your counterargument, and you basically said it word for word, haha. The feminist part of me wishes people weren't so bitter. The selfish part of me doesn't want to date MRAs because we generally don't share the same value system, and I've basically given up on trying to convince them that feminists aren't so bad.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:40 PM
0

That is important to distinguish, but this interpretation would be accepted in most academic circles, so I see it as more legitimate.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:32 AM
-1

I'm honestly not sure that I want it to go away, for reasons that I stated before. And yes, I do realize that not everyone in this movement (if we want to call it that) is a monster. I'd rather not get into a debate with you about MRM vs. feminism because they tend to go in circles, and there are a lot of emotions involved on the MRA side that I don't want to touch with a ten foot pole. In a nutshell my take on the laws that disenfranchise men (and they do exist) are the result of patriarchal ge…
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:21 AM
2

This makes a lot of sense. I, too, take a lot of issues with the institution of marriage. But I was so with you until "non-Western countries." Not to put words in your mouth, but the last time I heard a guy say that he liked women from non-Western countries, it was because "they know their place." Please tell me that's not what you meant. If not, I'd be curious to know what you did mean.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 12:07 AM
-1

You know to be perfectly honest (and I fully realize that this is probably unfair) when I think of MGTOW or whatever it's called, I think of that song, "Go My Own Way" that came out on Youtube that was just filled with violent misogyny, and I get this queasy feeling in my stomach. Have you seen it?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:57 PM
0

Doesn't that go both ways? WHen more men "go their own way", women will end up finding themselves excluded from the dating pool, and realize that there is no dating pool anymore. Yeah, I haven't had that experience at all. let's just get rid of the dogmas and start over. No strings attached, no unreasonable demands and no expectations of gender roles. That is feminism.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:45 PM
1

My opinion is probably not welcome here as a feminist, and I realize that. That's why I want to say this as respectfully and directly as I can. I don't know much about this movement and have not heard of it outside of reddit. My general reaction when I first heard of it was amusement and eye-rolling. Thinking about it further, I have no feelings of "how dare you," as you say. My opinion is that if you are truly this type of person who doesn't want a relationship, who believes that women as a who…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:25 PM
3

Perhaps he is intellectually your superior. /s
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:26 PM
0

but you have admit this: you came here with a very hostile attitude. you were not looking for a conversation. you kicked the door in and just accused OP of being a pedo. cleary that was very shallow and cheap. but instead of just being banned and mass downvoted you had a debate, an exchange of ideas/ opinions. Solid point. It was pretty immature and I'm sure solidified people's opinion of feminists. Subreddits like these make me physically sick sometimes, but expressing that through personal att…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/13 05:04 AM
0

Oh. I feel like an asshole. I'm sorry I criticized your use of a language that isn't your first. (Not sarcasm, in case you were wondering) You could go into /r/feminism and express yourself without getting banned. You couldn't do that on /r/shitredditsays, though lol. That all being said, I really am sort of tired of this debate, but less so because of you and more so because I'm just ready to go talk about something else. But I might take you up on your advice to start my own post about these t…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/13 04:50 AM
0

You know, actually...I'm going to stop arguing with you. Honestly, the thing that offends me the most is that you can't even take the time to try to use proper grammar and spelling. That just makes me assume that you're unintelligent and/or ignorant, which supports my suspicions of people who have such a patronizing contempt for women. What I say is not likely to broaden your perspective. I regret posting here, and in that sense, you were right. I'm sure I'll get a "good riddance" from you. Oh, …
/r/TheRedPill01/04/13 04:36 AM
0

They were refuting the evidence for the Westermarck effect by studying the same group of people. Also, small-scale qualitative studies are more appropriate for such nuanced theories and usually provide much richer data. But all that aside, I think the first article was more compelling, tbh. And yes, articles. Scholarly articles. What's wrong with that? Would you prefer Wikipedia?
/r/TheRedPill01/04/13 04:25 AM
-3

Thank you for another thoughtful response. I understand where you are coming from, but you have a few logical flaws: For instance, you assume that love = sexual attraction. I kind of agree that you can't switch off love, but I bet you anything there are several things that can switch off your sexual attraction towards a woman. For instance, you meet a beautiful woman with great "tits and ass," as you so gracelessly put it earlier. But then she reveals to you that she likes to murder kittens for …
/r/TheRedPill01/04/13 04:15 AM
0

No, I am not a scientist by trade (I wish), but I'm guessing that I probably know a lot more about social science and human biology than you do. Although I'd like to point out that you neglected to add any sources to your assertions, I'd be happy to share mine. Sources: This article talks about the role of society in attraction. This article challenges the Westermarck effect and provides evidence that incest taboos are reinforced culturally rather than biologically. I could cite more, but I'm no…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/13 03:36 AM
-3

You bring up a good point (thanks for referencing an actual theory). However, I don't know what it is about science lately, but we're putting too much stock into evolutionary instinctual behaviors. The main advantage of homo sapiens over any other species, the advantage that allowed us to conquer the world, is our ability to adapt through culture. Almost any biologically instinctual tendency can be overridden by cultural beliefs. Like I said, up until recently, cousin marriage was normal and acc…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 08:25 PM
-4

I've already addressed this, but TL;DR: cultural beliefs are the main driver in attraction, while biological urges play a lesser role.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 02:27 PM
1

Culture plays the largest role in attraction. I find it kind of sad that your main defense is that you're more "monkey" or "lizard" than human. A lot of recent psychological research has shown that we can control what we had once assumed was simply instinct. Most of it comes down to what you believe: do you believe that being attracted to a 15-year-old is right or wrong? If you believe that it is right, you will maintain the attraction and indulge it by subjecting poor internet women like myself…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 01:45 AM
1

It's not about the body ultimately. 15-year-olds are children, perhaps not anatomically, but legally and, more often than not, mentally. Like I said, I could understand being attracted if you assumed that they were of legal age, but I would hope that your conscience would step in upon discovery of their age, as it would in the "accidentally checking out a family member" scenario. I don't buy that you can't control your attraction. Attraction is as much culturally and morally learned as it is bio…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 12:13 AM
-4

Yes, I think it's gross if someone masturbates to an image of what they know is a 15-year-old child, no matter how "mature" he or she looks. Edit: I can see being attracted to a girl who is 15 and looks 24 if you assume at first glance that she is 24. But I would hope that upon learning that she was 15, your attraction would melt away the same way it might if you discovered that you were accidentally ogling your sister.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/13 11:51 PM
-4

You tell me. You're the one who posted it twice.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/13 02:26 PM
-3

How many times have you masturbated to this picture?
/r/TheRedPill30/03/13 04:42 AM
-6

That's funny, because here's what I found from, you know, the dictionary: ped·o·phil·i·a [ped-uh-fil-ee-uh or, esp. British, pee-duh-] noun Psychiatry. Sexual desire in an adult for a child. Sounds like you're just trying to find a way to justify your attraction to 15-year-olds. Gross. I actually think the key words in your definition are typically characterized and primary. As in, attraction to anyone under the age of 18 (a child) could be considered pedophilia.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 05:55 PM
-2

I'm a little confounded by this response, so I'll just break it down: What is an alpha widow? Just curious. What does my comment about internet points have to do with SRS? If you post about how the ideal female is generally under the age of 18, don't be surprised if someone asks you if you're a pedophile. As to your response, "Not even if they tried," do you mean that it's difficult to each Cheetos and live in your mom's basement?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 05:44 PM
0

Absolutely not saying that. I agree with you that there are some shitheads out there who clearly do not put a lot of critical thought into what they say and do. All I'm saying is that when you use one example to label "feminists" in general, you're effectively stooping to their level. Why not just say, "some feminists?"
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:19 PM
-2

Not that it's any of your business, but I had to recently create a new profile because of a stalking ex-boyfriend. Now, pedo or no pedo? Edit: Also, do you live on the internet on such a level that you judge a person's worth by internet points? Wow, I can see now why you post on this subreddit. Are they all like you?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 06:30 AM
-1

Nice work dodging my question, dear.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 06:14 AM
0

Yeah, I kind of take issue with the whole "the feminists I disagree with represent all feminists" mentality that MRAs tend to have. They don't. Feminism is not a homogenous movement, and there is a lot of lively internal debate. The fact that they're visible does not mean that they represent even a small majority. That is simply a myth.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:33 AM
-7

Are you a pedophile?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 02:07 AM
1

A very valid argument against affirmative action. I hope you'll hear my counterargument. Having proactive, positive diversity training to educate employees and dissuade them from making prejudiced gender stereotypes would be beneficial. I would argue that this would promote rather than detract from free-thinking and creativity because the culture would transform into a more relaxed atmosphere of open-mindedness. The added benefit of drawing from diverse backgrounds and ways of thinking can foste…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:42 AM
0

Interesting observation. Why do you think that?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:31 AM
-6

Pick fights, mostly.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:19 AM
-5

I meant larger organizational diversity training. To avoid gender stereotyping. Not individual training for preference hires.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:17 AM
-1

All right, all right, here you go. Jesus.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:09 AM
-5

I'm pretty sure I didn't say any of that, dear.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:52 PM
-8

Too lazy lol.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:06 PM
-10

I do agree that diversity for diversity's sake is often poorly thought-out and backfires. But strategic, well thought-out diversity (with training, support, etc) has been shown to improve companies. My two cents, anyway. Thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 10:37 PM
3

I think this is also a feminist argument. Just saying.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:58 PM
-23

Exactly what does this have to do with mens rights?
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:54 PM
5

Yeah, I wouldn't want to be your friend anymore, either.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter