TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zarquon989 Archive

View 52 posts and 382 comments by zarquon989 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
112

zarquon989/r/MensRights08/08/11 12:15 AM
87

Activism/Supportzarquon989/r/MensRights29/10/16 12:50 AM
79

zarquon989/r/MensRights05/09/11 03:19 AM
75

zarquon989/r/MensRights08/08/11 06:08 AM
71

zarquon989/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:31 PM
63

zarquon989/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:10 PM
57

Activism/Supportzarquon989/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:39 AM
56

zarquon989/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:43 AM
47

zarquon989/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:41 PM
39

zarquon989/r/MensRights12/05/11 10:05 PM
38

zarquon989/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:16 AM
38

zarquon989/r/MensRights23/10/16 05:32 AM
32

zarquon989/r/MensRights08/11/11 01:22 AM
32

Social Issueszarquon989/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:16 AM
32

zarquon989/r/MensRights26/08/12 11:13 PM
28

zarquon989/r/MensRights22/06/11 10:48 PM
28

zarquon989/r/MensRights20/08/12 01:53 AM
28

zarquon989/r/MensRights13/09/11 12:38 AM
26

zarquon989/r/MensRights23/10/11 04:29 PM
24

zarquon989/r/MensRights10/08/11 04:11 AM
24

zarquon989/r/MensRights18/06/12 04:40 AM
20

Edu./Occu.zarquon989/r/MensRights17/11/16 01:15 AM
19

zarquon989/r/MensRights16/08/12 11:39 PM
19

zarquon989/r/MensRights29/06/11 12:34 AM
17

zarquon989/r/MensRights17/03/11 09:12 PM
15

zarquon989/r/MensRights17/01/12 09:01 PM
13

zarquon989/r/MensRights01/09/11 11:37 PM
13

zarquon989/r/MensRights18/12/11 08:41 PM
12

zarquon989/r/MensRights14/01/11 12:40 AM
11

zarquon989/r/MensRights01/08/11 01:18 AM
11

zarquon989/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:46 AM
11

zarquon989/r/MensRights04/07/11 08:16 PM
10

zarquon989/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:24 PM
9

zarquon989/r/MensRights09/08/11 04:05 AM
8

zarquon989/r/MensRights20/10/11 10:07 PM
7

Generalzarquon989/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:37 AM
6

zarquon989/r/MensRights22/12/11 02:07 AM
6

zarquon989/r/MensRights01/07/11 02:24 AM
5

zarquon989/r/MensRights08/02/11 10:16 PM
5

zarquon989/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:29 PM
4

zarquon989/r/MensRights02/06/11 10:12 PM
4

zarquon989/r/MensRights16/03/11 10:11 PM
4

zarquon989/r/MensRights16/06/11 10:35 PM
4

zarquon989/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:25 AM
3

zarquon989/r/MensRights24/02/11 09:00 PM
3

zarquon989/r/MensRights01/09/11 11:02 PM
3

zarquon989/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:46 PM
1

zarquon989/r/MensRights12/01/12 09:28 PM
1

zarquon989/r/MensRights25/08/19 01:13 AM
0

zarquon989/r/MensRights14/06/11 12:08 AM
0

zarquon989/r/MensRights15/12/11 10:20 PM
0

zarquon989/r/MensRights30/08/11 10:20 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Only many years ago. I was at a small nightclub talking with my friends when a cross-dressed man sneaked up and goosed me from behind. I was shocked, and a bit embarrassed by the fact that it actually felt pleasurable. I didn't say or do anything. Then there was the time I was seated at a strip club. Without invitation, one of the naked ladies stood over my chair and shoved her pussy in my mouth. That was the first time I technically 'gave oral', but all I can remember is the taste of talcum pow…
/r/MensRights02/11/18 10:52 AM
19

I was in a room, talking to a friendly feminist about their issues in general. Admittedly my interest stemmed from a very naive idea: that by asking feminists what women actually wanted, I would be able to provide it and attract a partner. I wish I had had access to r/theredpill then, or even r/niceguys so I could have avoided that embarrassing mistake. At least I wasn't making passes at anyone - way too shy for that! There was another feminist in the room, holding her male baby. When my friend …
/r/MensRights01/11/18 11:37 PM
3

It isn't even information - It's just a bunch of unsourced claims and hysterical paranoia. There's not a single link to anyone actually promoting "corrective rape", for example. The author claims that comes up "regularly", but fails to provide a single example.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 09:36 AM
1

Sadly, I think you're right. But it doesn't hurt to try.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:34 AM
1

That's awful, but it's only one person. The others may not be so bad.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 12:43 AM
5

The organisers should contact these guys. They meet on the third Wednesday of each month, which is the Wednesday after next.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 08:35 AM
1

Good luck with it.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 06:45 AM
2

That's good. You should secure the cooperation of someone well known in the community, and then present your proposal to the mods for a green sticky. There's a link in the sidebar. Tell them EvilPundit posting as zarquon989 sent you.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 12:32 AM
4

You should probably give more details about this project and exactly where the money would go.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:02 AM
1

I'd say there's more sanity than ignorance. There's only one person being ignorant, and they're listening to counterpoints.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 02:29 AM
7

I always stand a little bit back from the edge, and keep an eye on the people around me.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 07:12 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with having a different opinion.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 10:38 PM
1

Do these screenings make a profit? It would be good if successful screenings could fund more screenings.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 04:31 AM
1

Yes there is - a very powerful argument. Please don't try to pretend that my own comments don't exist! Why is it so important to you anyway?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:50 PM
1

No - It's important to make it as easy as possible. Some people won't even be bothered to cut and paste the URL. Attention on the net is a very fleeting thing - even a tiny inconvenience can make a big difference. We need obstructions out of the way completely. We should stop being so paranoid over a handful of clickthroughs. We just don't generate that much traffic. On the other hand, comments are worth more than gold.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:44 PM
1

I think it's good to link directly, because it encourages us to make comments. Comments on articles are a very powerful tool, usually underestimated. The number of clicks that come from here are very small in the greater scheme of things, usually no more than a few hundred; but each comment has the power of a thousand clicks. Of course, having an archive link in our own comments is also good, because it preserves a copy of the original page in case it is later edited or taken down.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:05 AM
1

The one in the Telegraph was pretty decent. I don't have time to link it now.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 09:03 PM
15

That's actually a pretty good article. I would never have expected such a balanced portrayal from a mainstream left publication.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 09:22 AM
1

Sounds like the sort of place feminists would hang out at.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 09:01 AM
4

So is this venue in a feminist hotspot? I'm not familiar with London at all.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:30 AM
2

Is this the same fund raising that is happening on ozcrowd.com? That one is showing over $8400 pledged. Are there two campaigns to und the one showing? If there are, then the extra money should be directed toward something useful.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:26 AM
1

If it's satire, then what is it satire *of?* I can't find any plausible target other than men as a whole. That bit about killing all the men was completely serious.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:40 AM
2

Somebody is not nice. 😢
/r/MensRights30/10/16 06:27 AM
1

I did actually google The Red Pill. The front page was almost all about the movie, with many positive stories. That's what you get if you search for "the red pill". If you search for "theredpill", then you'll get the links to the sub which you saw. The exact wording of the search term is surprisingly significant.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 06:18 AM
1

That's amusing, considering your username. ;)
/r/MensRights29/10/16 02:14 AM
2

Now fully funded!
/r/MensRights29/10/16 01:00 AM
1

Activists please note the structure of the title. It's designed using "thumbnail psychology". Here is where = direct link to action you can help = a call to said action fund the Red Pill screening in Melbourne = what it's about I put in $50 = leading by example will you help? = a personal request to the reader So that's one way to get results. u/atheist4thecause says the fund has jumped by $1000 in one day.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 10:54 PM
4

https://redd.it/59teyd
/r/MensRights28/10/16 11:40 AM
8

I can't be in Melbourne - but my money can!
/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:48 AM
14

Definitely satire. Anne Gus = Angus. He or she does great work. 434 comments on that article!
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:50 AM
18

This account was created six hours ago, and posts only lies. That is how we know it is a troll.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:34 AM
16

I can't find where to donate. Please help! EDIT: I found it. Contributed $50!
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:00 AM
1

u/deansdale.didn't provide any examples to support his point. We need to lift our game above that. You did provide an example.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 09:53 PM
6

This is the second misandrist film she's done this year - the first was inspired by Gamergate.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 07:55 AM
2

PLEASE DON'T USE ALLCAPS IN POST TITLES
/r/MensRights21/10/16 07:45 AM
2

I don't know, but you could try these guys: http://mensrights.com.au
/r/MensRights15/10/16 07:12 AM
1

Hahaha, great plan! Put out another press release if she refuses to attend.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:39 AM
4

Awesome! Keep up the great work. If you have time, or a suitable volunteer, you could send out a press release to yor local media.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:36 AM
2

The moderators here have sometimes helped with crowdsourcing by posting a sticky link to the page. They already did that for this post, so you could thank them and ask.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:08 AM
4

If you have a campus newspaper, it's possible that a feminist might write an article against your club. If that happens, ask for a right of reply. If not, after you get established you could write an article promoting the club.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 05:03 AM
4

Radical feminists love to invade these meetings and disrupt them. If you you appear on their radar, be cautious. Organise for several people to take videos from different angles if this ever happens. Then you'll have evidence for campus security and YouTube. This may sound paranoid, but it's happened many times already. Just be prepared, and hope this advice isn't needed.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 04:55 AM
16

It's men's fault for creating a society so rich and advanced that parasites like this can exist. An economic collapse or a war would get rid of their noise because more people would be needed for real work, and serious discussion would be necessary.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 04:39 AM
3

She did an AMA on the default sub a few years ago.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:41 AM
2

She was a total certainty until Trump turned up. She might still win, but it's not a done deal yet. As for OP'S effort, it made objectively undeniable progress. Even if no changes are made next year, the issue has been acknowledged. It is completely unrealistic to think there has been no progress, and it's irrational to think that less than total success means the effort should not have been made at all. Your pessimism is getting in the way of your judgement. Anyway, I have nothing more to say, …
/r/MensRights04/10/16 08:07 AM
1

Yes there is. They have already promised to change the next issue. We'll never make progress if we give up when we don't get everything wth the first try. We already got something this time, and we'll probably get more next time. We'll never get anything if we don't trry.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 05:02 AM
1

You can't expect them to pulp a whole edition because of one error. It's probably been distributed already. Progress shouldn't be dismissed because it hasn't reached perfection. We should encourage it rather than complaining.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 04:43 AM
-2

You might also find some support at r/menslib. It's a feminist sub, but not quite as ban-happy as the others. As long as you don't say anything that disagrees with their ideology, you should be okay.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 04:32 AM
6

Menslib it isn't very big or very active, yet it has well over a dozen moderators. Sometimes there are more mods than visitors! It's a typical case with feminist subs - they feel they need overmoderation to make sure dissenting views are quickly removed. R/feminism is one of the few exeptions; u/demmian acts as sole proprietor.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:04 AM
8

Actually I'm very pleased by this. Random people are starting to use the term Men's Rights. It's really getting into the public discourse, whereas just a few years ago it was only known in a tiny corner of the Internet. That's real progress.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 10:35 PM
6

If feminism doesn't go away, men will.
/r/MGTOW30/09/16 06:04 AM
2

MGTOW has grown to the point that feminists see it as a threat. Before, it was regarded as too small and obscure to worry about. This is a repeat of how MRAs emerged into public view a few years ago.
/r/MGTOW29/09/16 02:19 AM
7

I really like Liar Liar. It's a comedy with a lot to say about fatherhood and divorce courts. Death Becomes Her is a dark comedy which dares to strike at the "women are wonderful" myth. It's also hilarious.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:42 AM
1

Looks like this project is dead. Time to unsticky it?
/r/MensRights24/09/16 01:43 AM
2

Who, exactly, is blaming all women for the actions of a few? Post some linked examples from this subreddit, please, Mr Brand New Account.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:10 AM
3

That dude in the States was Hugo Schwyzer. Same schtick - preach feminism, be an ultra-feminist, put down other men - all so he can exploit young women for sex. I wonder how many male feminists are like this?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:11 AM
5

Not all that surprising. The Authoritarian/Liberal quadrant would mainly be the domain of feminists and SJWs.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:02 AM
15

This is a very important post. I've long felt that feminist depictions of abusive men are largely based on projection. That is, feminists accuse men of doing the things that feminists themselves want to do.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 11:57 PM
2

There are a whole lot of really sexist articles in Psychology Today blogs. I've been commenting on them, but I don't have time to make long and detailed critiques.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:54 AM
7

I love the expressions on the guys on either side. "Why are we sitting next to this jerk?"
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:52 PM
9

That article was written by a "journalist" who was caught on video, tearing down the posters. A truly unbiased observer. :P
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:50 PM
10

The feminists are already turning on gay guys who identify as male - witness the "die cis scum" slogan floating about.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:48 PM
13

I can't help but feel like the articles on AVfM have alot to do with their hatered of MRA's in the first place. They'd hate us whether AVfM existed or not. They're feminists, and any suggestion that men aren't privileged oppressor-rapists will cause them to erupt in hatred.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:47 PM
1

Thanks. It's good to know where you're coming from with this. I don't regard those comments as being harmful myself. I'm more worried about anything that might tend to be misogynistic or to incite violence. But I respect your concerns.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:02 AM
3

If you've seen so many useless and sarcastic top posts and comments, perhaps you could offer a few examples?
/r/MensRights10/09/12 02:25 AM
27

One of the major areas where men lack rights is parenthood. A large part of this problem is caused by concerted feminist campaigns to portray fathers as useless, harmful, abusive and predatory. Articles which assert the positive values of fatherhood are a useful countermeasure to the ongoing War on Fathers.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:59 PM
7

Dr Helen is a long-time supporter of men's rights. She's writing a book about it.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:09 PM
12

You know the feminists are running scared when handful of posters sparks a major media attack.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:03 PM
4

Pfft. As if decent men could be found on jezebel.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:42 AM
2

I would not advocate or support violence. However, when more and more men are driven to the breaking point, it seems inevitable that violence will happen. I hope we can reform the system and society before we reach that stage.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:10 PM
3

Aww, it's not that bad. The climate is very warm, so the men who lose their homes hardly ever freeze to death.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 03:30 AM
22

I consider it a case of ideologically induced psychosis (IIP).
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:21 AM
34

That's just your typical SRS lunatic hatemonger at work.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 01:27 AM
19

It's the entire website that offends me. It totally ignores violence against men, and deliberately paints men as the only aggressors and women as the only victims. The whole campaign is just a way of smearing and guilt-tripping men. I consider it a hate site.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 01:24 AM
2

And with humour. I don't think he understands it.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 01:00 AM
18

It's true if you only count earned dollars over a lifetime. But if you count hours worked at the same job and the same skill level, it isn't true. This is a trick with statistics. By ignoring the fact that more women choose to work part-time, or in lower-paid positions, or to stop working in order to raise children, it creates a false impression. It also ignores the fact that there is a huge transfer of wealth from men to women through taxes, alimony, marriage, and child support. If you count th…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:35 PM
6

And there's not one thing that's "first hand" in any of that - unless he means the hand he's wanking with. Even SRS thinks it's crap.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 10:32 PM
3

They look pretty good to me. With feedback on possible improvements, you might have something very good going here.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 10:20 PM
9

It would be hilarious if they actually held a women-only vote on abortion, and banned it. Watching the feminists rationalise it away would be most entertaining.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:25 AM
29

Oh my god ... Wolf tells the story of a party her friend Alan threw her, in celebration of Vagina finding a publisher. As a joke, Alan said he was going to make vagina-shaped pasta, which he did. When, in front of guests, he referred to it as "cuntini", Wolf was so horrified, so traumatised by his language, that, she writes, she suffered six months of writer's block. And people take this person seriously?
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:40 AM
12

Let me guess ... the men's way is wrong?
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:36 AM
6

Hahahaha! That's a great response to anyone who brings up the "only women should vote on women's issues" argument!
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:20 AM
38

And as long as only taxpayers are allowed to vote on government spending, and only soldiers are allowed to vote on war ... hey, I'm starting to like this idea!
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:48 PM
13

As far as I know, in the general population, more women support outlawing abortion than men do. This is just another feminist shaming attack on men.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:47 PM
7

I hate to say this, but links to SRS-related subreddits are banned in titles. You may find that your comment is deleted here. If so, perhaps try a self.post. Also, SRS are half-trolls, half-bigots, half-insane and 100% scum. Don't have anything to do with them.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:32 PM
2

It becomes a men's issue when we consider the difference in reproductive rights between women and men. Every time the topic of abortion comes up, we should associate it with legal abandonment for men. Every time.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:30 PM
10

Either everyone should be able to get an abortion or no one should. I'd go further and say that men should be able to get financial abortions if women can get abortions - and that if men can't renounce responsibility for the child of an unwanted pregnancy, then women shouldn't be allowed to abort. Either everyone should have reproductive rights, or no-one should.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:21 PM
1

I'm not talking about your question. I'm simply pointing out that you're an SRS commenter, so people can avoid wasting their time if they choose.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 10:32 PM
6

^ SRS troll.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:24 AM
6

^ SRS troll.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:23 AM
1

While I won't get involved in this discussion, I'd like to welcome you to this subreddit, and thank you for the effort you've put in to making a reasoned and respectful post. I hope the replies you receive are equally civil. It's by engaging with the broader community that our movement will grow.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:54 AM
4

Wow. The amount of misandry that's leaking from academics is just sickening. Comments on that article are open, by the way. :)
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:41 AM
1

That would imply that men are 12 times more likely to succeed in a suicide attempt than women. I don't think the choice of methods can account for such a large discrepancy. The only plausible alternatives are that woman are too incompetent to kill themselves, or that they aren't really trying as hard as men.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:06 PM
0

Isn't this the same person who allegedly lodged false copyright claims to shut down other people's videos on Youtube? If so, that's legally actionable as well. She could be navigating into troubled waters.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:00 PM
1

My attitude is a product of the fact that the overwhelming majority of feminists regard the men's rights movement as the enemy, and act accordingly. To ignore this fact would be foolish.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 10:17 PM
1

No, the rate of suicide attempts is about the same. It's the success rate that is about four times higher for men.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 10:16 PM
8

Because somehow that's still sexism against women. The mental contortions that feminists put themselves through are incredible.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:15 AM
9

What I would do would depend on the specific circumstances. If such aid reached more women and children, but men were left out, I would not consider it acceptable. I would want to see men getting as much as women. However, it is ideology that drives the women-first aid mentality. That sexist ideology needs to be fought, and the agencies which perpetrate it should be exposed and boycotted.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:54 AM
14

It isn't just education. There's a concerted, feminist-driven movement among aid agencies to funnel aid to women and reduce or stop aid to men, across the board. After the earthquake in Haiti, several agencies were handing out food to women only, and denying it to men. This sex-based redirection of resources is being pushed by feminists in the NGO sector and at the UN. It's becoming quite widespread.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:42 AM
3

That's the spirit! He's a lucky man.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:01 AM
11

There's an increasing trend in aid organisations to target only females for aid. This is something that needs to be exposed and campaigned against.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:57 PM
3

I'm tempted to go there just to get a higher-resolution photo. I suggest you repost this on /r/australia and r/sydney, pointing out its location. Do advertisers really think Australian women are this shallow? I should hope not!
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:48 PM
3

It was in Sydney? Which station? Any contact details for the advertiser?
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:39 PM
1

That's up to them.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:18 PM
1

While the men's rights movement isn't totally blameless, the great majority of the blame rests on feminism, which has been actively attacking men at all levels for half a century.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 10:16 PM
1

I didn't say anything about changing moral beliefs.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 10:14 PM
33

Feminists feel extremely threatened and fearful of a group that challenges their beliefs and propaganda. They also fear losing the power and privilege they have gained by their dominance of gender discourse. So they smear and attack us in any way they can. There will be more of it as we grow in numbers and influence.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:15 AM
1

I think there have been some studies to that effect. However, you'd need to make a lot of assumptions to assume that the majority of female suicide attempts failed because of the methods used. One would be that females are less competent than males.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:11 AM
1

That's one of the factors involved. But a bigger factor is that more men actually want to die.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:53 AM
3

It's negotiation, and bargaining. I'll give you this if you give me that. Humans do it all the time.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:12 AM
1

It would be good to work together, but at this early stage feminists are opposed to men's rights. This is partly due to their own propaganda which paints men as evil, dominant oppressors, and partly due to their fear of losing the power and privilege they have gained. I hope this may change eventually, but as long as mainstream feminists continue to attack men and to campaign against equality, the two movements will be in conflict.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:30 PM
-1

I believe that many of them aren't driven enough. Many women attempt suicide as a call for help, whereas men tend to actually want to die. This accounts for the large difference in death rates, even though the attempt rates are about the same.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:29 PM
7

And a false accusation of rape is a crime.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:27 PM
2

The same way you prove any other crime - beyond reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:17 PM
40

Looks like you need the female privilege checklist. And here's another one!
/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:13 AM
5

The original post is an ad. If you have an ad blocker enabled, you won't be able to see it.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:39 PM
4

It's all part of spreading the word.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:55 PM
1

They will know. For one thing, they'll read this thread with you talking about it. It's a terrible idea, and all MRAs should oppose it.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:41 PM
52

Your reaction was a good one. That sort of behaviour is unprofessional and unacceptable. Beware of possible "revenge" in future.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:38 PM
1

We could make fake staged /r/bestof posts, for example. No, that's a bad idea. Fakery will be exposed and cause a backlash. The truth is on our side, and we should not undermine that.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:11 PM
10

Soon it won't need women, either. Also, current science would not exist without men, so men are still involved.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:42 AM
8

Been there, done that. Keep an eye out for Part Two, coming soon ...
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:03 AM
2

This isn't a Women's Clinic. It's a Women's Centre.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:24 AM
10

EP's work alter ego here. Like I said, "If you feel like getting in trouble".
/r/MensRights23/08/12 11:59 PM
36

Manhood101 spammer. Downvote, report, and ignore.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 11:32 PM
12

It's a very, very mad world.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:31 PM
1

It's linked from one of the sidebar FAQs. The details are here. Citations are at the end of the main article.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:04 PM
4

This is more than a technical issue. Your service needs some kind of legally valid authentication. For that you'd need to talk with a lawyer - which I'm not.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:59 PM
23

And the Supreme Court ruled in favour of slavery in Dredd Scott. Court opinions change with the times. Edit: It just occurred to me that having special women-only spaces is a lot like having special whites-only park benches and drinking fountains in the Old South. Except even then, blacks had black-only facilities for themselves. Men don't.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:54 PM
7

I'd say rapists shouldn't have any rights to the child of their victim. Unfortunately, if the rapist is female, she not only gets custody, but is also entitled to collect "child support" money from her victim. I'd also note that this has been posted in TIL and /r/politics if anyone wants to join the discussion.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 02:52 AM
1

Anyone can claim anything on reddit. While this is possible, I'd want some evidence before I took it too seriously.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 12:35 AM
3

I apologise for putting my previous comment in the wrong place. It was meant to go here.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:18 AM
2

Not this bullshit again. Stop being so childish.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:18 AM
2

That article has a comments section powered by Disqus, as have many others. Anyone who bothered to comment here ought to sign up to Disqus, and put the same comment there.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:16 AM
2

I don't have a strong view either pro or anti abortion. I do have a strong view that men and women should have equal reproductive rights. Thus, if men can renounce responsibility for an unwanted unborn child, women should have a right to abort. Conversely, if men can't legally abandon an unborn child, then women should have no right to abort. It's the only way to have equal rights. MRAs should only support abortion if feminists support financial abortion.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:09 AM
31

I literally do (almost) that. Every couple of hours I go through the "new" page, and upvote anything that isn't an obvious troll. This is to counter the downvote brigades from SRS and the like. I recommend everyone make it a habit.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:12 AM
3

Well, one answer is that anarcho-capitalists could operate as cooperatives with equal shares. But my deeper point is that an anarchistic society would have different regions and communities, where different rules would apply. So one area or industry might be run on socialist principles, while another would be capitalist, and yet a third might be religion-based.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:58 AM
1

Oh, we won't get much support. But we will throw the double standard into sharp relief, and may eventually force feminists to stop using Title IX to attack men.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:56 AM
7

Though I loathe George Galloway, I think he's right on this one.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:45 AM
18

Thanks for the heads-up. Actually these guys are pretty well known as spammers and general jerks in the men's rights community. They call themselves "Manhood 101" and try to sell "courses" on becoming a man. They are generally abusive and constantly spam men's rights forums. They are banned from /r/mensrights and many other forums, but they keep coming back with new sockpuppets.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:33 AM
5

Maybe in your tradition. But an anarchist society would necessarily allow multiple different types of economic organisation. Also, while anarchism is inherently opposed to the state, it is not inherently opposed to property.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:50 AM
0

No. Equality is good for men and women. Equality is hostile to feminism, and feminism is incompatible with equality.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:49 AM
14

Nevertheless, /r/anarchism is an oppressive, totalitarian hierarchy. If the people who ran it had power in the real world, they would produce something very similar to Kampuchea or North Korea.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:47 AM
6

How is anarchism different from anarcho-capitalism? Anarcho-capitalism is one branch, or version, of anarchism. There are others, such as anarcho-socialism, anarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-communism and the like. I think it inevitable that a truly anarchist society would have all these varieties co-existing.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:42 AM
3

Anarchists come in all varieties of economic types, from pure capitalist to pure communist, and everything in between.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:40 AM
6

Ironically, that thread illustrates how hostile /r/Anarchism is to men and equality. Just as /r/anarchism is itself an example of a totalitarian despotism run by a self-elected elite.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:46 AM
7

Congratulations, and good luck! Unfortunately it's difficult to compete with established subreddits.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:22 AM
5

The fun will start when men's rights activists demand that schools shut down courses and activities in which women are disproportionately enrolled.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:20 AM
4

The SPLC is really into sparking up a campaign of lies against us. I guess their alarmism over racist groups isn't raising enough donations to fill Mark Potok's $300,000+ paycheque.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:14 AM
3

This post links to a blog by someone who is either a troll or insane. My guess is that the link was posted by a troll, since the redditor immediately deleted his/her account. Said troll may be the owner of the tumblr account.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:42 PM
2

Isn't the systematic denial of misandry by feminists totally misandric? It is.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:40 PM
8

The linked article cites at least one source claiming that women and children make up 80% of all war casualties. Note also the way that "women and children" are always lumped together in such claims. This is a handy way to exaggerate the rates compared to men alone. If the split was "women" versus "men and children", the results would be very different.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:53 AM
3

The moderators have stated that those posts were removed because they were primarily race-related, and gender didn't directly and substantially feature in the linked material. While both topics were worthy of note in their own right, I don't have any objection to their removal, considering the explanation was provided and was adequate.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:41 AM
2

That last photo is hilarious.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 02:24 AM
34

So farmers will pay more, in order to attract vets to their area. And most of those vets will still be men. Then we'll be treated to a round of whining about how "male vets get more money than female vets".
/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:04 AM
5

Abortion certainly isn't in the best interests of the child. So let's not pretend that a society in which abortion is legal has any regard for what benefits the child.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 10:10 PM
3

do we live in a country where a woman, when asked in court who the father is, can say "uh... that guy" and the judge says "pay child support" WITHOUT any fucking testing? If you live in the USA, yes.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:58 AM
3

It's dying, but slowly. As long as we persist in exposing and opposing it everywhere, it will die. Social change takes time.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:03 PM
8

If this isn't in the FAQ, it should be.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:00 PM
13

Oddly enough, the SPLC does not list hate groups that happen to be left-wing or feminist. In fact, it actively collaborates with the feminist hate group, Radfem Hub. It seems that in its eyes, some haters are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:52 PM
6

The SPLC was probably partly responsible for a violent incident at a restaurant a few months ago, where a white rights group was attacked while having dinner. This was probably a result of the SPLC doxxing such groups, which enables extremists to target them.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:51 PM
3

girl That's why.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:56 AM
2

There are some jurisdictions that define rape as "sexual penetration without consent". Thus, a woman can be convicted of rape if she penetrates someone with a finger, dildo, or other object. I can't remember which these are - possibly some Australian states? But if you can find these laws, you will have ammunition.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:41 AM
7

Four hours later, it seems the answer is "no".
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:15 AM
5

I edited my comment to expand on it.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:13 PM
8

And even the feminist's analogy is one-sided. Though there is some point to it, the fact is that feminists and MRAs don't actually want the same things. This can be seen in the way feminists consistently oppose moves towards equality for men in family law, reproductive rights, education and the justice system.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:09 PM
9

I think there might be a case of mistaken identity here.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:07 PM
15

This user is an SRS troll. Downvote and ignore.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:05 PM
1

13 year old troll can't count, can't spell either. What has happened to our education system?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:01 PM
1

Basically, yes. I'm hoping they didn't use a proxy because they didn't think anyone would care enough to take legal action.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:57 PM
1

I doubt I'd be able to convince you with anything. Believe what you want to believe; I'm through arguing over this side issue.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 05:18 AM
1

Nope. It isn't "hundreds of signals". That would mean the changes would be gradual over time. If a search result goes from Number One to total disappearance overnight, it's due to deliberate human intervention. There are numerous well documented instances of Google censorship.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:12 AM
6

Oh look! Here's the website where you can quickly sign up, vote on the proposed panel, and even leave comments!
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:08 AM
4

China isn't the only place they've done this, though it's the most prominent. They also remove Google search listings for some pages based on politics. I've had this happen to a couple of blog posts of mine, which apparently offended a fan of Michael Moore who happened to work for Google. Also, the famous googlebomb that connected a search for "miserable failure" to the home page of the US President was allowed to stand by google for five years or so - but a few days after Obama became president…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:48 AM
5

Feminism is not for men, feminism is for women. Men need an equivalent. And that equivalent is right here, in the Men's Rights Movement. The Good Men Project is just another branch of feminism, and is useless to men.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:04 AM
3

It's not misandry at all? It's speculation as to the cause of the recent trend of men lagging behind women in certain areas of life. It's misandry, because it blames men's own attitudes for the problems which they suffer due to discrimination. It's like saying to blacks in the southern states in the 1950s, that their problems are all caused by their own bad attitude. Or do you think that it's a feminist conspiracy that is keeping a large population of our gender living at home unemployed in thei…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:59 AM
5

Prior to this thread, I thought the two of them were genuine. But it seems now that they were concern trolls all along, just saying pro-MRA things to build up karma and credibility. Odd that they should blow all that effort without any real result.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:41 AM
4

the article blames men and women - primarily men Exactly. That's one good reason to reject it outright. but considering it's written from a male perspective i don't think that's too unreasonable. Misandry is misandry, regardless of the sex of the author. thank you for judging the article without reading it though. You're welcome. I've seen enough of this stuff to recognise the signs, so I don't have to waste my time reading it. if you have an example of something that is unreasonable on that web…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:30 AM
5

I skimmed the article. It's the usual "men's problems are men's fault" stuff that feminists use. It also contains refers to misandrists like Michael Kimmel in a positive manner. The Good Men Project is well known at /r/MensRights. About 70% of their material is feminist in nature.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:12 AM
22

You sound like a faggot mangina cowering before women. U MAD FAGGOT? LOL And this is why trolls from Manhood Academy, AKA Manhood 101, are banned on sight.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:09 AM
6

No, this is just feminist propaganda attempting to co-opt the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:58 PM
3

Don't get mad, get victory. By which I mean, persist in promoting men's rights at all levels, and don't give up. The best way to gain satisfaction over people who have ridiculed your ideas is to see those ideas grow and bear fruit.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:36 PM
3

Well, there's one way to find out - and I'm willing to kick in $200 towards that.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:06 PM
3

I'd say there's a reasonable chance they didn't take any special precautions. I doubt they were expecting a possible lawsuit.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:51 PM
11

What Curebores said. GWW's videos had been watched over 300,000 times when I last checked. She's an extremely effective voice for the MRM, and this effectiveness is enhanced because she's a woman. I wasn't able to do anything to stop those other takedowns, but I can think of more than one effective way to take action this time. We haven't fought back before because we were too small and disorganised, but now we can realistically take on such a task.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:48 PM
4

I think she could sue the people who posted the false takedown notices. It's been done before. Online Policy Group sued Diebold over the takedown requests, arguing that the Group had the legal right to publish the e-mails. A California court agreed with the Group and granted a request for summary judgment, after which Diebold settled with the Group to pay $125,000 for their monetary losses and legal fees.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:34 PM
4

I like this part: Online Policy Group sued Diebold over the takedown requests, arguing that the Group had the legal right to publish the e-mails. A California court agreed with the Group and granted a request for summary judgment, after which Diebold settled with the Group to pay $125,000 for their monetary losses and legal fees.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:30 PM
4

Evil Pundit's work account here. So you're just going to give some single mom hundreds of dollards, sight unseen, because she's playing the victim card, without any corroboration? No, absolutely not. This is why I said: But first it needs to be decided if that's the best course of action, and it needs to be properly organised. "Properly organised" in this context clearly means "arranged through a lawyer representing girlwriteswhat". God, this place is really starting to stink. The smell isn't co…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:23 PM
5

I've addressed this in another comment: Nevertheless, the claimants will have left tracks - especially if they didn't expect any consequences for their actions. As far as I know, Google can and will hand over identifying information if it is requested by a court of law.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:20 PM
6

I would be surprised if the claimants used any real identifying information while making their claims. Nevertheless, they will have left tracks - especially if they didn't expect any consequences for their actions. As far as I know, Google can and will hand over identifying information if it is requested by a court of law.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:17 PM
25

Or even try to get a restraining order, preventing her from contacting your children. That would be a moral victory, and she might even get the idea that she's doing something wrong.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 10:50 PM
0

MRA: "They call me the Lord of Shit. But I think you are the true Lord of Shit". SRS: "That's 'shitlord'". MRA: "Thank you. But I prefer it my way."
/r/MensRights13/08/12 10:32 PM
5

The truth is that feminists have actively opposed any and all steps toward equal rights for men, and continue to do so. Like most feminists, you insist that you have men's problems in mind. And, like most feminists, you don't back up your words with action. We MRAs have heard it all before. And we've seen that while feminists talk equality, they only act to oppress men. More and more people who actually believe in equality will simply stop listening to feminists.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:45 PM
6

That's the theory. The reality is that feminists use "patriarchy" as a code-word for "men".
/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:37 PM
0

I think that listing men's rights groups as misogynist, while simultaneously accepting support from a radical feminist hate group, is 100% the result of toxic feminist ideology. If there are any non-toxic feminists in existence, have they protested against the SPLC's sexist double standard?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 12:56 AM
3

This is one of the insidious things about feminist ideology. If you are a man who believes in it, then you automatically become a bad guy because of your sex. The only way to feel good about yourself is to put all the "unenlightened" men in the "bad guy" category, and be one of the Judases who spreads the feminist message.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 02:59 AM
8

I used to like John Scalzi, but this whole man-bashing thing is getting up my nose.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 02:27 AM
0

Unfortunately, those sentiments conflict with what mainstream feminism actually does in practice - which is to empower women and disempower men.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 06:19 AM
12

Are these men who aren't getting degrees being denied entrance into college? Some of them are, if their colleges have "Affirmative Action" policies that give preference to women. But it's more an issue of the entire education system being discriminatory against males. This is the direct result of feminist education policies over the past fifty years, which aimed to eliminate discrimination against females. In this they were successful, but they then went on to introduce discrimination against ma…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:57 AM
5

Feminists are a very powerful and organised lobby group, which pretty much dominates politics and the media in regard to anything gender related. Also, women are the majority of voters and politicians are terrified of offending them. So in most cases, feminists get their way.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:48 AM
3

In general, weren't most of these laws are written by men? Irrelevant. Men can be feminists. Also, male politicians can get personal advantage by gaining the support of feminists. Don't make the mistake of assuming that "feminists" and "women" are the same thing. They aren't.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:25 AM
3

"Patriarchy" is a feminist code-word for masculinity, maleness, and men in general. By blaming "patriarchy" for men's problems, feminists are ultimately blaming men. Furthermore, by doing this, feminists are shifting the blame away from feminism, which has done a great deal to harm men. It's an insidious and self-serving tactic which needs to be called out.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 11:21 PM
2

Of course. Feminist-supported unequal legislation is one of the main factors driving the growth of the MRM. The more bad laws they pass, the more of us there will be.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 11:11 PM
5

The same site hosts an article by the same author, titled The Entitlement Complex of Mass Murdering White Men. Thus, neither the site nor the author are in any position to complain about sexist, harmful articles. Incidentally, the user account that posted this belongs to the website in question, and is only used to spam their articles around reddit. Downvoted with extreme prejudice.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 11:04 PM
2

The MRM itself has mostly arisen in response to the excesses of feminism. The antipathy between the two movements is pretty fundamental.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:41 PM
4

The definition does not correspond with the reality of feminism. Here's another article from the sidebar, showing how mainstream feminists actively oppose equal rights for men. You are approaching this issue from the wrong side. If you want MRAs and feminists to work together, first you have to persuade feminists to stop attacking men.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:36 PM
15

Theoretically, yes. However, courts don't really enforce child support orders against women with the sort of enthusiasm they direct a forcing men to pay. So, in practice, a woman who actually has to pay child support to a man is pretty rare - though they do exist.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:27 PM
-6

Trying to make fun of MRAs. Not with any great success, since it's only making fun of straw MRAs.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:19 PM
3

That's gold! You should post it in reply to the original comment.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 02:50 AM
17

It means that person has put themselves into debt to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars, only to have their brain scrambled by what passes for education in the humanities department of some university. In ten years, that person will be unemployable, and desperate to marry a rich, dominant white male who can pay off their bills.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 02:44 AM
6

I'm sure the Southern Poverty Law Centre will get right on to condemning this sexist hate speech.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:25 AM
3

Please don't feed the troll.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:59 PM
2

Unsurprising, but useful in online discussions.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 09:10 PM
10

But it helps to have a study handy when you're trying to explain the obvious to someone who doesn't see it yet.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 09:10 PM
1

One I've noticed recently is belittling MRAs by referring to them or their arguments as "adorable".
/r/MensRights04/03/12 10:40 PM
2

That's awesome. I only wish it was in text format, not just screencaps. That would make it much easier to distribute.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 12:57 AM
1

Bit of a chicken-and-egg thing in many cases, I think. Family Court drives man to commit murder/suicide, which in turn is used to claim the Family Court was right all along. The question is, though, would it have happened if there was no threat of Family Court involvement? Possibly not.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:58 PM
13

I was going to make a similar suggestion, but more along the lines of cutting off the tongues and vocal cords of women who lie about rape.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:37 PM
1

Warning: Spamhood Academy link!
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:04 PM
4

A troll has posted a troll post. Downvote and ignore.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 11:08 PM
10

If feminist dominance of our legal and social system continues to become more oppressive, I predict an increase in the numbers of angry young men.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 10:41 PM
9

But remember, feminists support equality for men too! /s
/r/MensRights16/02/12 11:18 PM
6

There are a few such guys here. But I'm not one of them. Also, this thread will soon fill up with trolls.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:12 PM
0

Persist anyway. When they're down to personal abuse, they're losing. Also, on the Internet, you're not necessarily trying to win over the person you're arguing against. The real goal is to win over the silent lurkers. So stay calm and rational - their screeching only makes them look bad.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 08:57 PM
9

Whenever I get that, I just say the same thing holds true for women. "Women don't need abortion rights. If she didn't want a baby, she shouldn't have had sex." Then watch them wriggle.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 11:24 PM
2

And four other reddits.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:49 PM
5

It might be interesting to ask him where exactly he got those numbers. Though I wouldn't suggest doing anything that might harm your career. Academics can be vindictive sometimes.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 12:11 AM
4

I think the title is a quote from some other source. The author of the linked article, Dr Helen, is a well-reputed advocate of men's rights and would not seek to bury such information.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 12:09 AM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights15/01/12 11:53 PM
3

Thanks again. I guess any useful searching would probably have to be done by someone with a knowledge of Icelandic language and culture. In any case, I know of plenty of examples of women in all those categories, so the 100% business is, as you surmised, just wrong.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 11:52 PM
5

Thank you! Hmmm, from Google it seems that there is a well-known Icelandic person of that name - who is a conceptual artist! And another result shows a theoretical physicist. And a hydrodynamic engineer. I haven't found a psychologist yet.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 11:46 PM
2

This list needs to go in the FAQ!
/r/MensRights15/01/12 11:35 PM
3

Those numbers are definitely lies. Could you provide the name, authors, and publication data of the book, please?
/r/MensRights15/01/12 11:34 PM
2

Like all feminist "research", it's agenda-driven bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 12:41 AM
9

I disagree. We should not attack other men's rights activists. We have enough enemies already.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 12:38 AM
4

There's little data, so we can only guess. One thing I'm sure of is that the numbers are growing more rapidly than I've ever seen before.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 12:31 AM
3

The resource your professor should use: http://www.batteredmen.com/fiebertg.htm
/r/MensRights09/01/12 01:08 AM
3

Nah, we should all just become trolls with 11-minute-old accounts.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 01:23 AM
30

Unless it's circulated on the Internet ...
/r/MensRights04/01/12 10:05 PM
7

Brilliant! Very well done.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 10:05 PM
5

Go away, troll.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 12:43 AM
-1

I'm sure the feminists would try. But there are some important differences between the two reddits, including population and purpose.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:51 AM
1

It's easy! Any intelligent person can find ... Oh, wait. Of course you need help. Here you go, troll.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 11:48 PM
1

I don't actually know who has most of the wealth in the world. It could be men, it could be women. But feminists claim that women have only 1% of the wealth. That's a lie.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 09:24 PM
2

Yes, there are many men who were raped, statutorily or otherwise, by women. When the woman fell pregnant, those men were forced to pay their rapists money in the form of "child support". This is a far more common situation than the one linked by the OP.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 09:19 PM
3

Trolls gonna troll.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 01:21 AM
5

No, you're simply choosing to ignore the evidence I presented.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 01:16 AM
-1

Too bad; I'm not your research assistant. Google is your friend.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:48 AM
9

I already gave you an example - the use of Title IX to attack men's sports in colleges, even though that gives no obvious benefit to women. Also, there are the feminist campaigns against any attempt to give fathers equal rights in the family court, and many more.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 11:54 PM
0

Oh, that's gold! What a creep he is.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 11:51 PM
6

MRAs aren't arguing for 50/50 division of wealth. We're simply pointing out that the feminist claim that men have most of the wealth is a lie.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 11:27 PM
6

Feminism vs men is very much a zero-sum game. Feminists believe that any advance for women can only come at the cost of men. They also believe that any harm to men will automatically benefit women - thus, for example, the attacks on men's sports under Title IX.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 11:05 PM
18

Named and shamed. This has the potential to get quite big.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 01:07 AM
2

Heh. The creator of this language says all existing languages are male-dominated, and incapable of expressing women's perceptions. This sounds completely plausible. Because, like, women never talk.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 10:06 PM
1

Looks like an interesting thought experiment. I can imagine some feminists learning this, like some trekkies learn Klingon.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:33 PM
37

They say they're non-serious, but that's just another lie.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:13 PM
2

This site is comedy by a troll. Anyone who takes it seriously doesn't get the joke.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 01:58 AM
3

Good to see that this got coverage in what appears to be the mainstream press. We're slowly gaining ground.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 12:24 AM
5

I've commented on that article (under a different screen name). I'd suggest others do so, too. Every voice counts.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 10:38 PM
7

At the macro level, says Pinker, there is a consensus in the international community “that violence against women is the most pressing human rights problem remaining in the world.” Sigh. Domestic violence is not a human rights issue. It is a criminal issue. Also, the statement is sexist because it ignores violence against men, which is in fact far more prevalent than violence against women.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 12:45 AM
4

Either a troll, or an unwanted extremist. He spends more time attacking MRAs than doing anything constructive.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 10:03 PM
3

Se my suggestion - the default could be set to father's last name for boys and mother's last name for girls.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 10:02 PM
0

I think the child's last name should be jointly decided on by both parents. My own preference would be the father's name for boys and the mother's name for girls.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 10:01 PM
1

Check the sidebar.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 11:18 PM
3

That definition is just the label on the box. What's inside the box is different. You might as well believe that the "German Democratic Republic" of East Germany really was democratic, if you believe that.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 10:53 PM
9

Wow. That's just insane. tl;dr - The hostile reception of the SCUM Manifesto in Sweden shows that the country is sexist against women.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 10:49 PM
11

The funny part is that she doesn't seem to be over her own rape apologetics. The Vagina Monologues includes a section entitled "The Little Coochie Snorcher that Could". This portion of the play, as originally performed, has been criticized for including a rape scene of a 13-year-old girl by a 24-year-old woman who uses alcohol to lower the inhibitions of her victim.[13] At the conclusion of the segment, the narrator (the grown-up thirteen year old girl) fondly reminisces about the rape, claiming…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 01:25 AM
1

Don't condemn a lengthy essay just because you have a trivial disagreement with one sentence. Downvoted for being a dick.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 10:39 PM
1

The bots are on to you!
/r/MensRights14/11/11 01:51 AM
7

Nice of them to advertise our subreddit!
/r/MensRights31/10/11 11:45 PM
3

Sometimes I just can't resist feeding them ... Yes, feminism is a dire threat to men. However, the answer is to promote equality, not do to women what feminists would do to men.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 10:39 PM
3

As a man, I can assure you that I'm very aware of threat when walking in a rough neighbourhood.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 09:49 PM
15

Great graph, but a link to the context would be very helpful.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 09:31 PM
3

r/amr is pretty much irrelevant. Most of the moderators and contributors are batshit insane. There are only about three people who post there regularly, and only one comment for every ten links. It does have some use as an archive of the best content on r/mr, though. Be proud you made the cut!
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:13 PM
14

The men's rights aspects are twofold: (1) The media reporting emphasises the man's violence, and downplays the role of the women as instigators. Both stories from CBS led with the beating, but didn't mention that the women attacked until later. (2) The man faces much more serious charges, even though he was not the instigator. This is discrimination in justice.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 07:34 PM
12

It's almost like the ad campaign was created by different people than the website.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 07:11 PM
1

That is a very good point, and one which has been brought up before. The man's actions after he had incapacitated his assailants were inappropriate. Depending on his state of mind, they may have been criminal. Nevertheless, he is not the primary aggressor, and most of the commenters seem to realise this. By starting a fight, the two women became primarily responsible for the consequences, even if their victim took his retaliation too far.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 07:09 PM
8

Targeting abuse by men while ignoring abuse by women is an attack on men. It's a hate campaign. As another commenter pointed out, targeting an anti-crime campaign specifically at black people would be regarded as racist. These sorts of campaigns are exactly what the MRM should be opposing, for those reasons.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 06:19 PM
18

If you actually read their website, the campaign claims it is in fact targeting abuse generally. See the FAQ. The fact that the ads only target abuse by men is a failure to carry out the stated purpose of the campaign. Furthermore, it is ethically wrong to target only abuse by men, when in reality abuse is carried out equally by both sexes. There is no justification at all for such a one-sided campaign.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 05:41 PM
20

There is a contact page for feedback on this campaign: http://thisisabuse.direct.gov.uk/have-your-say Also, you can complain to the Advertising Standards Authority in the UK.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 05:24 PM
19

This argument is invalid. The campaign is not directed to one gender alone. The ads target both males and females equally, but the abusers are always portrayed as male, and the victims are always portrayed as female.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 05:20 PM
10

The first one: He is an American Hero. He should be commended, not punished. The cretinous savages who think that they can vault over the counter with an obvious intention of doing violence to someone can have something to remember. They probably will not do that anymore. Actually, they should pay him for the training that they received, he has probably made them better “people”. Third reply: I agree with the negative comments here about how women act nowadays, and I’m a woman. My daughter feels…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 04:31 PM
3

I don't know anything about it, but welcome anyway! Try r/oney, maybe?
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:31 AM
2

... rather than instigating pure aggression and violent tendencies, as feminists would like to believe.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 11:18 PM
9

You are an r/mr subscriber. There's only one way you could be sure that dude was an r/mr subscriber ... Seek help.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 02:08 AM
2

It should be up to the parents. My own preference would be the father's name for boys, and the mother's name for girls.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 12:39 AM
2

I don't really care. It isn't a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 10:31 PM
9

1) How would you define Rape Culture? A feminist myth that is used to defame and demonise men as a group. 2) Do you think Rape Culture exists in America? No. 3) Do you think that America places much of the blame in rape cases on the victims? If so, why? No. Almost everyone acknowledges that the blame for crime lies with the criminal. 4) Any last comments? If Rape Culture existed, then rape would be legal and socially acceptable. Rape is illegal and socially unacceptable, therefore Rape Culture d…
/r/MensRights19/10/11 12:40 AM
2

Umm, no. Kind of completely unlike that.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:11 PM
9

I don't see it as badmouthing. They're just saying that they run a men's rights subreddit that is less hostile to feminism than this one. I hang around r/MR partly because I'm hostile to feminism myself. But I don't see it as harmful that there's another community with a different approach - as long as it isn't trying to subvert the movement. I regard NSWATM and The Good Men Project as examples of such subversion, and I oppose those two.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 10:48 PM
5

So do I. Occasionally, though, I visit the sexist subreddits to see if any of my comments have made the grade. I was disappointed when my observation that feminists love rape didn't make it.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:03 AM
1

I think it's time to discuss banning this troll. Impersonating a moderator is not on.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:15 PM
3

Try this: Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence From the U.S. Federal Courts by David B. Mustard, 2001 Also, MRref is a good source for stats.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 09:22 PM
5

I think she did. r/@ moderators frequently ban people for doing the same things they do themselves. In fact, QueerCoup is one of those moderators. In the linked thread, he is misgendering people - while non-moderators have been banned for doing the same.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 12:06 AM
2

Did you know that 50% of the perpetrators of domestic violence are women?
/r/MensRights29/09/11 11:10 PM
4

thepinkmask is a friend of QueerCoup and also a moderator at r/@. In other words, they're members of the same clique. Holding them to the same standards they demand from others is "trolling". Edit: IMO this makes the whole thing worthy of r/subredditdrama.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 09:41 PM
10

Can you point to a single bigoted thing I've ever said? http://manboobz.com/
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:42 PM
9

But you certainly do. So that's at least one.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:17 PM
8

Alternately, I'd suggest "bigots" or "sexists". The existing phrasing is rather clunky, and as some have pointed out, there aren't many identified "anti-equality activists".
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:46 PM
3

So am I right in assuming that you don't believe there are any genuine male Feminists, and that men who call themselves Feminists are just in it to...get sex, basically? No. Some of us actually bought the feminist lies and propaganda. We believed in feminism and acted on it. But after years of exposure, we saw the reality behind the facade, and became anti-feminists.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 09:53 PM
3

Going by the comments, hardly anyone's buying the "misogyny" schtick.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 10:24 PM
1

Their numbers are small compared to ours. If only a few of us made it a practice to upvote everything in the "new" queue (apart from troll posts), the problem would go away. I go through the "new" page and upvote everything whenever I visit /mensrights.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 09:58 PM
1

His co-worker is a mouse? :)
/r/MensRights15/09/11 11:43 PM
2

One group to be considered are the pathological man-haters who happen to be men. Extreme male feminists along the lines of Schwyzer and Kimmel have a deeply internalised self-loathing that is not mentally healthy.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:58 PM
1

A 31-page survey?
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:05 AM
2

I wouldn't worry about accusations from that turd Queercoup. It has launched invasion attempts on r/MR before.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 01:41 AM
2

I find this female privilege checklist to be a good antidote.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 12:36 AM
14

That isn't irony. It's extreme stupidity combined with emotional thinking and having been hurt by a man at some point.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 10:28 PM
2

That is WTF indeed. I suspect this person may undergo some pretty extreme mood swings, presenting in different ways.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 09:53 PM
9

Umm ... how can they tell who's male and who's female? Idiots.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 12:43 AM
0

Having sex while in possession of a penis
/r/MensRights29/08/11 10:37 PM
2

I'm starting to wonder the same. It does nothing but troll and spew insults.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 11:08 PM
2

(This is EvilPundit's work account) Fair enough - I was wrong about that. But still, there's Your mother/sister won't give me this, and I/men need it. If you tell anyone about this, I will stop giving your mother her child support and you/she will be homeless and starving. and a few others that imply male abuser/female victim. However, reading the list again I see I was wrong and that there are some more even-handed ones ... I was/am the parent/spouse/teacher/authority figure; therefore I know b…
/r/MensRights28/08/11 10:11 PM
3

As do I. We just shouldn't assume that it's true, or untrue, without evidence.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 11:49 PM
1

We don't know if this claim is true or not. Even if it is true, we don't know who's doing it.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 11:21 PM
1

Maybe they're from other trolls. It's certainly a rotten thing to do, whoever is responsible (assuming this is true). But, as others have suggested - screencaps and usernames please. I would condemn anyone who did this.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 10:57 PM
2

Well, you're the moderator. I'll say no more about this.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 02:55 AM
4

That's not actually possible, because they censor and ban any discussion. Let's show we're better than that.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:35 PM
2

kloo2yoo has explained what happened in the other thread. I can understand his motives in retrospect, but I would ask him to reconsider.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:22 PM
4

Thanks for the explanation, kloo. I appreciate the fact that it was from the sockpuppet of a banned user, which on further thought is a justification for deletion. However, given the nature of the post I would petition for leniency on this one. We should at least be seen to be making efforts at reconciliation where possible.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:19 PM
3

Unfortunately, I can't do that until I get home, because that account and its password only exist on my home computer. It's pretty well known that we are one and the same, though: Here's evidence.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:02 PM
4

I thought it might have just been the spam filter at first, but my alter ego's post has been deleted. Moderators, this is not okay. Leave the douchebaggery to skobrin et al.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:58 PM
2

I commented under my alter ego, EvilPundit. I didn't delete that post, but it's gone. Moderators, this is not okay. Leave the douchebaggery to skobrin et al.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:56 PM
5

I never said that r/@ created r/amr. I said that the moderators of r/@ created r/amr. The members of r/@ are victims of the modreators of r/@ - they don't support the mods but they can't remove them.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:18 AM
8

At least you're no longer trying to deny that they made r/amr. Talk about projection. Some individual members of r/mensrights visited other reddits. Some were harrassed and unfairly banned at r/@. Then the moderators of r/@ collectively created a reddit to attack and troll r/mensrights. They are the aggressors, and now they're trying to deny it.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:05 AM
7

Spin all you like. You aren't fooling anyone.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:56 AM
5

Those cowards can't handle dissent. They'll sensor and ban anyone who exposes their lies.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:49 AM
6

I guess respecting the integrity of other subreddits comes second. It certainly comes second to the moderators of r/anarchism and r/metanarchism. They created an entire reddit devoted to trolling r/mensrights and stalking its users.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:48 AM
4

It isn't an utrelated subreddit. r/AMR was created by the people who are the current moderators of r/anarchism and r/metanarchism.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:46 AM
-2

The accuser is the person who makes the accusation. If the accusation is true, the accuser is the victim. If the accusation is false, the falsely accused person is the victim.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 11:33 PM
8

And now the feminists over at r/metanarchism are wondering what it was they did to draw our attention. Jeez, it's almost like they forgot they were the ones who created r/AMR in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 10:34 PM
12

Another mod of r/AMR.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 03:06 AM
5

Uh-oh. Here it comes ...
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:55 AM
4

Cats. We're going to need lots of cats. /Matrix
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:39 AM
18

Reported to moderators for ableism.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:21 AM
8

Okay. We now have twice the crazy.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:20 AM
16

lady_catherine finally loses her last remaining shred of sanity. Film at 11.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 10:48 PM
2

Some of the comments there are pretty encouraging. When even Huffington Post readers stand up for men, you know there's change afoot.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 11:59 PM
1

Why? Because feminists demand advantages for women and disadvantages for men. It's what they do.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 11:47 PM
2

I got banned before you did. XD
/r/MensRights18/08/11 11:41 PM
2

The r/anarchism self-destruction has reached new heights of hilarity. Mods are now banning random people after accusing them of being sockpuppets - and missing the real sockpuppets.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 01:20 AM
1

Oh, that's unusual. When r/amr was started, they banned about 50 people who had posted on r/mr, even though they hadn't commented there at all.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 12:44 AM
2

Don't even bother commenting on /amr. They'll just instaban you. Just take your complaints to r/anarchism and r/metanarchism, which are run by the people who created /amr.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 12:15 AM
2

One snmall quibble: Q: Do you pine for the olden days, when a man could beat his wife with impunity? There were never any "olden days, when a man could beat his wife with impunity". That's a feminist myth.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 03:09 AM
2

I sent some money too.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 10:44 PM
4

Troll.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 01:45 AM
5

That depends a lot on sample selection. If selection is good, 5000 is quite a large sample and usually generates a margin of error around ~3%.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 05:57 AM
5

Yes, the comments are surprisingly positive. Maybe the issue is getting traction.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 01:36 AM
2

I appreciate the fact that you're at least trying to talk. However, some of your feminist preconceptions stand in the way of communication - namely, the idea of "male privilege" and that "women have it worse than men". Try temporarily shelving these ideas. Also, there are very good reasons for male hostility towards feminism. Feminists have been berating and, yes, oppressing men for over five decades now. Most of us have grown up in a world that hates men. It will take a lot to get past that.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 01:25 AM
6

"A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle".
/r/MensRights08/08/11 01:10 AM
6

A bit of both. They are driven by ridiculous ideology as much as personality faults. They actually believe they are making their reddit a "safe space" by banning words like "drama" on the grounds that they're sexist. Yes, seriously.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 03:01 AM
-1

Check this thread. You can't make these things up.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 12:08 AM
2

Don't even bother trying to post to /r/againstmensrights. If you want to say something, confront the moderators of /r/anarchism on their own reddit. They're the ones who founded /r/againstmensrights and run it. Also here: http://www.reddit.com/r/metanarchism/ The first few topics are quite enlightening.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 11:36 PM
2

Has anyone actually confirmed whether this is true or not? Let's not celebrate prematurely.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:32 PM
4

LOL - it gets better! They created the subbredit, linked it and added mods without telling any of the other mods! http://www.reddit.com/r/metanarchism/comments/iv69x/banned_bptst1/c26w89a
/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:50 PM
8

No. I haven't spoken to him in years now.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:49 PM
14

One of my friends said he wished I would die, after I stood up for men's rights. No longer a friend.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:36 PM
1

I "signed" and my comment is there.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 10:08 PM
5

Thank you. I left my own comment, under a different name.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 10:07 PM
1

But if it was done to infant girls by their parents, it would be the same. Would society consider that acceptable? If not, why is male infant circumcision acceptable?
/r/MensRights03/07/11 10:37 PM
3

The next time a feminist says you can't compare FGM with male circumcision - tell them about this. It's pretty much the same thing. What if parents did this to baby girls?
/r/MensRights01/07/11 02:47 AM
3

I started off as a feminist too, and changed for much the same reasons.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 12:21 AM
1

The rape fantasy studies are real, but the "rape enjoyment" studies are made up. The whole article just confuses the issue and gives ammunition to our enemies.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 12:08 AM
1

From a moral standpoint, given the harm being done to men,children, and society, can we allow these truths to remain hidden? But that's my point. They aren't truths. The whole article is made up - just read the last paragraph. This kind of stuff just discredits the movement and is easily used against us.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 10:48 PM
3

I don't like articles such as this. They may make sense to MRAs who take the trouble to read all the way to the disclaimer in the last paragraph - but they are easily exploited by the likes of Manboobz. I think it's a tactic that has more minuses than pluses.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 02:44 AM
-1

Plus, bonus rage comic!
/r/MensRights14/06/11 12:23 AM
3

The difference between /r/mensrights and /r/feminisms: On the latter, every comment by OP would have been deleted, and the title would be changed to an insult. On /r/mensrights, OP is allowed to express opinions. That's equality.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 10:03 PM
5

Feminists are not fighting for equal rights for women. They are fighting to put down men.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:28 PM
14

Feminists, not "women".
/r/MensRights06/04/11 10:42 PM
29

This link is from a person who falsely accused Kloo2yoo of being a frequent poster on /r/whiterights. Kita is a liar with no integrity.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 10:28 PM
14

They're getting worried.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 01:46 AM
2

We are doomed.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 09:00 PM
5

Feminists want rape to be regarded as the worst possible thing that can ever happen to anyone, that is always done by men. This is, of course, so they can make men feel guilty and leverage that feeling to gain power. For this reason, feminists hate rape jokes, or indeed anything that suggests rape isn't the most horrible crime in the world.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 10:56 PM
3

The linked article is a fake.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 12:11 AM
2

Unfortunately, this link is to a fake article. The real press release can be seen here. While I share the sentiments of the author, telling lies is not helpful. The truth is enough.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 12:10 AM
0

Yes, but I think it's important to spread the word to other forums. I have commented there under another name.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 12:00 AM
2

Comments on that site are pre-moderated, so if you want to say something, keep it civil.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 10:18 PM
0

Hmmm, makes sense ...
/r/MensRights02/02/11 11:09 PM
0

I don't know why they bother - all they achieve is to trash their own reputations and become outcasts. Just crazy, I guess.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 10:07 PM
11

MHA are a bunch of whackos. They pulled the same stunt with The Spearhead some months ago. Basically they just post inflammatory stuff, then go nuts if you delete it or criticise them. They will attempt to destroy forums with hate-spam.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 11:13 PM
1

But what is it about this link that makes it a troll? As far as I can see it's genuine.
/r/MensRights27/01/11 01:57 AM
4

Some online discussion of the case - pre-moderated: When was rape not rape? In 1963?
/r/MensRights19/01/11 09:17 PM
7

Note that the comments at that site are pre-moderated - so keep it mild to get through.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 12:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter