TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

zlex Archive

View 2 posts and 199 comments by zlex on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Hey I'm the guy who pointed out your misunderstanding of libel law. I don't think you should have been banned but if you are actually interested I'm happy to explain. You asserted that if court found the man was found not-guilty the court would find her spreading the police report as libel. To be found not-guilty does not mean that innocence is proven. It means that there exists a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime. You do not prove your innocence in a court of law, you are …
/r/MGTOW18/11/18 06:44 PM
-10

If it was a dude, would it have been “a little much”? You mean if it was a little 10 year old boy? Uhh yes?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/18 10:44 AM
9

I think the prevailing line of thinking on this will start to change. Yes, from a public health perspective the PSA screening test was an absolute disaster. 1] It massively increased the number of unnecessary biopsies because the PSA test has horrible positive predictive value. 2] It led to a lot of early detection, which led to massive over-treatment. Millions of men had unnecessary treatment with life-altering side-effects. That said, there have been a lot of improvements to protocols since th…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 05:12 PM
10

The significant factor you're missing here is the median age at death, which is 80 for men with prostate cancer and 68 for women with breast cancer. Prostate cancer doesn't become a killer until late in life, whereas breast cancer kills young and middle-aged people. That is why people tend to die with prostate cancer rather than from prostate cancer, and why the decision to undergo treatment is not clear-cut. You have prostate cancer but you're 75--you're probably going to die from something els…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 04:11 PM
10

It's also a bit more complicated than that. The current struggle with prostate cancer is more about quality of life than survival. Radical treatment for prostate cancer is very effective but it can leave men with permanent erectile and urinary issues. Given that prostate cancer usually doesn't metastasize until late in life, the decision to undergo radical treatment is not always clear. Prostate cancer tends not to lead to death in men until they are well into their 80s. There is a balance that …
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:00 PM
15

Someone demonizing the opposite sex and their local culture as the reason for their own sexual/relationship failures and pining over how great it would be if they could just get their hands on one of those foreigners who embody all the qualities they are looking for. I feel like I've read this somewhere else, I just can't remember where it was...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 04:10 AM
18

See, I am infected with a mere belief; I believe a hyperbolic statement is -exactly- the characteristic 'emotionally driven.' Never mind 'the goal of freeing minds.' Not interested. Is this statement emotionally driven, or is it akin to something you would find in a research paper driven by facts. Convince me otherwise. Enlighten me. Here is your opportunity to shine. Change a mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 06:31 PM
28

The top stickied guilded topic in TRP right now says: "Single mothers are complete and utter mother fucking subhuman scum 99.9% of the time." Pure emotionally driven hyperbole completely divorced from reality. Reality no doubt includes single mothers who are single because their husbands were complete subhuman scum at a rate of less than 0.01%. Look, there are positive aspects of discussing relationships. When you finally leave the TRP sandbox---if you ever leave the sandbox--relationships are s…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 06:18 PM
2

I agree with this. My problem with TRP is more...this: http://www.donotlink.com/framed?518914 My reaction is "Partner count doesn't matter...that much"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 06:40 PM
10

There is nothing wrong about finding something unattractive. People who deride you for that are morons. Agreed 100%. It's not the axiom. It's the extremist theories that follow from that axiom which attempt to formulate the objective 'value' of a woman. The sheer amount of post-hoc-ergo-proctor-hoc logic that TRP spews from this concept is bizarre. In fact I would say that is generally the problem I have with TRP. Give some axiom that people can relate to: "Women are more emotional than Men" -> …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 03:57 PM
14

Do you tell people that want confident and career driven partners that they should be confident and carrer driven themselves? No. However, if you work at McDonalds, and your co-worker asks you out and you say "I am not going to date someone who works at McDonalds, only morons--except for me--work at McDonalds," you shouldn't be too surprised if people think you're an asshole. There is a difference between praising/appreciating/seeking certain qualities in other people, and deriding people who do…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 02:08 PM
1

i will quietly add that you are wrong about the conclusions that redpill reaches with those theses. Your opinion, as put, sounds more like a mechanism to communicate your spite and indifference(which I respect) than what i know you are smart enough to have understood from RP opinions. Maybe. I don't know. I'll admit that I am not a subscriber to RP. However, everytime someone mentions this, I end up looking at the sub and then reading something on the front-page that confirms my position. To be …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:05 PM
2

I apologize for the confusion, but I am not trying to convince anyone of anything. The purpose of my posting here is completed as soon as my fingers hit the keyboard. This is my mental masturbation. I suppose if I were to draw that analogy out that would make this place my Kleenex. To be clear, I am not pulling for any team. It is amusing to me, when a group people convinced of their superiority over another group of people in the area of logic and reason demonstrate the exact opposite. It's lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 06:15 AM
4

This really has nothing to do with vocabulary. Although if you work in mathematics, you should know that terminology is important. It has to do with your erroneous claim that divorce rate leads to a number that is too small and therefore the results can be discarded. That number is reflective of the probability that someone will get divorced. It's effect on the confidence of the point-estimate of the OR is plainly documented in the article. To be fair to you, if you wanted to criticize the resul…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 03:31 AM
3

Given that a couple was separated, what is the probability of man initiating the separation? 7x more likely than the female initiating it. You'll note that you only need to use the separated numbers to get this answer. This conditional probability, from this small study with very specific medical conditions, in my opinion, does not say anything about men as a whole. This is my stance on the OP. Except the only way to determine that '7x' is to use the entire population. You seem to be claiming th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 12:09 AM
3

I have no doubt that on average, people are average. No one gives a shit about BP because they aren't running around claiming they are more logical and inherently better at mathematical and scientific reasoning than 50% of the population because they have a dick. TRP takes general truths about men and women, as in, men tend to excel in math and science and then blows that factoid up into massive theories about how women are irresponsible teenagers driven by emotions and incapable of reasoning. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 11:01 PM
5

Doesn't have to be even, just makes the rest of the math go easy Yes, it does have to be even. That is the only way that your math will work out. If an even 100 patients, then your math works: (100/200) / (100/200) = 1 If the study was examining couples, what you're saying would make sense because you would always have an equal number of men and women. But the study is not examining that. It is examining individual patients. You say throw out the 'couples who were not divorced' but the study is …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 06:51 PM
3

No. This will be embarrassing but... Say you have 200 women and 50 men in your study. Half of women get divorced and half of men get divorced. 100 women, and 25 men. (100/125) / (25/125) = 0.8 / 0.2 = 4 Does that sound right to you? Are women 4 times more likely to get divorced, or are there 4 times more women then men? OR fomula: (100 / 25) / (100 / 25) = 1
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 06:20 PM
4

Upon what basis can you eliminate the couples that do not separate? In statistics the odds ratio measures the ratio of the odds that a specific event will occur to the odds of the event not occurring. You cannot possibly do this without including the...people who it did not occur to. The study does a basic evaluation of whether the odds of EVENT=DIVORCE is the same for group with ATTRIBUTE=MAN and ATTRIBUTE=WOMAN OR = (WOMEN DIVORCED/MEN DIVORCED)/(WOMEN NOT DIVORCED/MEN NOT DIVORCED) It's not c…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 03:46 PM
10

Sweet Jesus. 62 is not the sample size. A sample is representative portion of a population. 515 is the population. Period. No sample of that population was taken. The analysis was simple odds ratio: Attribute A (divorce) is strongly associated with attribute B (being female). If you want to claim the 515 patients are not large enough to be considered representative of the terminally ill population in the us have at it, but that is a good study size. If trip wants to run around shouting about how…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 02:49 PM
6

Because that makes no logical sense. For example many women are considered insecure for staying in abusive relationships, which is probably true because it might explain that. Many reasons to be averse to high partner count but insecurity is not outside the realm of plausible reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 04:10 PM
6

This is easy: Its not. To test this go around calling your girlfriend insecure because of some action she took.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 03:27 PM
1

I would if i cared. I was simply reiterating the OPs question, which no one seems able to answer
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 03:16 PM
2

This still does not answer the OP's question. What is positive about men who have a high partner count? I mean, if we're just going to run with this logical fallacy, this study shows that men and women who have only had sex with each other have 'better' marriages than those who've had premarital sex irregardless of gender. In fact it's the only statistic in here that shows the perspective of the other partner. Are men who are with women that have high partner counts less satisfied with their mar…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 05:03 AM
2

I'll post this here since the other exchange is buried. This is not an answer. In the own studies own words these are correlations, not causation. It's a logical fallacy to claim direct causation--Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc. For example, maybe more men care about their wives having multiple prior partners and they resent them for it, making their marriage worse overall. Or maybe not. Either way, it doesn't answer the OPs question, which was asking for concrete attributes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 03:23 AM
2

This is just circular reasoning. You're saying they are better because they are better. Not that I give a shit about this because its idiotic, but the OP is asking for an actual explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 02:52 AM
6

Don't hurt me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 03:49 PM
-1

Male/Female sex determination is based exclusively on chromosomes. No it isn't. Your genomic sex is not necessarily aligned with your phenotypic sex. This is a basic, observable, repeatable scientific fact in humans. I suppose this should be obvious since your second point directly contradicts your first point--there are repeatable symptomatic conditions which lead to incongruities between genotypic and phenotypic sex. The relationship between genotype and phenotype is non-linear and probabilist…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 06:11 AM
9

To be honest, I have no idea what you guys are foaming at the mouth about. How is this irreconcilable? The top comment in the thread the OP linked I don't think your husband is a bad guy. Maybe he just has different views on sex. You can't blame him for not liking what you did, because he either accepts it or doesn't. But hey, if there is no obvious difference of opinion here, then just plain make shit up using broad generalizations, set up the pins, and then knock them down in some massive stra…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 03:07 AM
3

I imagine that is both a serious problem but also likely overblown and sensationalized. One study claims 1% of women on campus experience sexual assault. The next claims 14%. Another 40%. There seems to be a lot of uncertainty in the measurement, and I'd say we are just winging it at this point, which is adequate for political science purposes--but not any reality independent of manufactured agenda driven reality. What I am not 'uncertain' about is whether or not mankind should embrace 'rape' as…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 07:05 AM
7

intelligence is only more attractive to people of comparable intelligence This should give one pause if they are pining over morons.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 01:12 PM
1

minimum federal tax rate is 15% and thats for anyone who makes 45k or less. If you make more than that, you pay more. And? In the United States the the lowest tax bracket bumps to 15% at $8.5k and to 25% at $35k. The Canadian bracket stays at 15% until $45k. The US also taxes top earners at 35%, whereas it is only 29% in Canada. Canada also has a substantially lower Corporate tax rate, 26.3% vs almost 40% in the US. As an American living in Canada I have not found my total taxation to be insanel…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 03:17 PM
2

I don't see why it's necessary to defend this kind of behavior. It doesn't suddenly validate TRP to point out this is a scummy thing to do. There is no need to assume what their motivations are--tinder is a dating app. The motivation of a guy on tinder around Valentines day is not to go shovel someone's car out of the snow as part of another person's social manipulation experiment. There are shitty people in the world and she is a shitty person for taking advantage of the emotional vulnerability…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 05:56 PM
6

Oh give me a break. She is being anything but straight with these poor guys. Tinder is for dating/sex, it's not a generic social media application. If she wanted to be straight up and was just looking for a human meatbag to shovel her driveway then she would have used the appropriate medium. The problem with that is most people would expect something in return for their service, like money. She used tinder because of the reason that people use tinder, which is for dating/sex. The men who came to…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 02:52 PM
14

Evolutionary psychology is mostly soft science gibberish. Abuse of science to foist a political argument. The required disciplines of the hard science – significance, uncertainty analysis, calibration – are uniformly missing. Not so much dismissed or ill regarded as never recognized as a significant part of the scientific process to begin with. The entire endeavor is perceived, therefore, as an example of what Feynman referred to as ‘Cargo Cult Science’ in his 1974 Cal Tech commencement speech. …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 09:11 PM
2

Extremists hate moderates
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 07:09 PM
0

Yea, I'm pretty sure saying she's a useful idiot and then...nothing else is not an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 07:37 PM
3

Wow, what a great argument. Argument against what? Guy attacking author and not her argument? I'd say it was a decent argument against...a one-liner ad hom.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 06:52 PM
4

I'd say 1 and 2 are the most important to me. I wouldn't date someone who I wasn't attracted to, and I wouldn't date someone who I didn't enjoy spending time with. In the short-term looks are more important to me than personality. It's difficult to get a read on who someone is when you first start dating, and really, early dating is primarily driven by sex. However, in the long-run personality becomes increasingly more important to me. It doesn't matter how sexy someone is if they are unbearable…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:57 AM
11

omg I am a gurrl!!~~ ^_^ pls try harder with next troll account
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:41 AM
1

How would you expect anyone here to change your view? I think you're confused about what subset of reddit struggles with getting laid. Who is scouring the in-ter-net for guidebooks and 10,000 page thesis' on how to get their dicks wet? This post is basically a rehash of the same scenario posted by another TRP guy http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2wgh08/a_woman_can_never_love_a_man_the_way_he_desires/coqnnij Must be some kind of shared experience... TRP hardly advocates treating …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 05:22 AM
8

Right, but the point is the blame they are assigning to themselves is poorly navigating the complete and utter failings of other human beings. When TRP says shit like The key trait of the modern western woman is her absolute lack of concern for the desires of men. And then says do x,y,z to take navigate that, you're expecting everyone to ho hum along with this idea that this is anything other than projecting blame onto women? Its like someone being unable to score in a game and then saying "Well…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 09:16 AM
8

So you're entire argument is predicated on the fact that you can't see the person? ?! I don't know how it could possibly be more clear. As per the narrative you are claiming the post I am referencing in my OP should be written by someone in the first stages of anger, someone who recently stumbled upon TRP, who is in the stages of consuming TRP, whose life is still shitty and they are pissed about that. Except that the post was written by a long-term TRP endorsed contributor who regularly doles o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 05:31 PM
2

I submit that this narrative, which I see all the time, is a complete fantasy. The comment was written by a TRP endorsed long-time member. In the next 15 seconds this member will flip-the-switch and begin dolling out advice as though he has a million dollars in the bank, a 10 inch dick and has mastered the art of women. Literally from the same guy a week ago. Get notions of fairness out of your head, the world isn't fair. Something doesn't need to be fair in relation to something else to be vali…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 04:54 PM
-9

No of course not. Everyone succeeds and everyone fails -- each for different reasons and definitions of success and fail. My point is TRP is desperate to avoid the reality of their failure, which is ironically totally anathema to their agenda. Some people go out and meander a solution to their failures and feel great. Other people trigger that dopamine release by closing their eyes and pretending they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 12:17 PM
0

Wait. A graduate thesis with the phrase less good in it. My brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 03:20 PM
1

I actually think you are misunderstanding, because what you said makes perfect sense, and I agree 100%. Straight from the stickied post at the top by a mod discussing the sidebar material on amorality. If a married woman has no moral compunction about stepping out on her husband, then the man she sleeps with is not burdened with moral compunction either. http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2qdc08/psa_im_adding_broknighting_to_my_list_of_bannable/ This is an action, to wit, fucking anothe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 06:39 AM
1

I am also a devout non-aligned agnostic theist.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 03:59 PM
3

a concept that has no merit outside religion The rational self-interest apparent in 'The Golden Rule' as one foundational basis for morality is apparent, and explains its almost universal appearance in the history of morality-- one that spans both religious and secular frameworks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 05:44 PM
3

You can pull a million examples of things that are amoral, but I fail to see how they are related to TRP's understanding of what amorality is. Even the main sidebar post that is always referenced to 'prove' TRP is amoral cannot hold a straight face when it comes to "Whatever we do to get laid is amoral," when it veers off into "Except for raping people," because then everyone would realize how off-the-rails idiotic it is to pretend that the interactions with our fellow human beings can be comple…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 04:55 PM
9

Because not everyone has a reptilian sense of value-less ethics, limited only by 'Can it eat me? Can I eat it?' and whatever else flows from there. I looked left and then right and concluded "I can fuck it, and if I don't, some other reptile will." You sell your self cheap. All perfectly legal. But in terms of ethics, thanks for the warning of what you believe is OK when nobody is looking. That principle isn't about what others like me would think if we knew. Or what the judge would say if he kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/14 07:14 PM
8

Even when a dude can legaly call another dude his wife? Wake the fuck up marriage is dead. Seriously pathetic. Whatever you need to write to justify shitty subhuman behavior is no concern of mine, and it may even make you feel better about it, but do not be surprised when other people outside of the bubble that considers you a 'writer' freely express their revulsion. You can have the RP mods minimize the amount of people allowed to call you a bottom feeding scumbag, the real slippery slope is be…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/14 06:56 PM
4

I think that people are largely missing the point though, don't you? If this is really about princess on the pea level of financial abuse, as in, my husband wouldn't let me buy Prada shoes even though I don't work, then by all means bring out the pitchforks. On the other hand if this is about providing a safety net for women seeking to flee abusive relationships who do not have the financial means to provide for themselves then I do not comprehend the outrage.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 05:48 PM
2

Right back at you. So, having used your formula of what I can only assume to be a MasterDebator, am I now worthy to leave the circle of jerks?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 03:40 PM
3

That's not an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 03:10 PM
2

No thanks. I'll consider the source. The author of that article is a babbling idiot, pushing his uninformed nonsense onto other victims. The perfect columnist for agenda driven dribble. In this case, the author is arguing that if only the man who beat his wife consistently and brutally and was capable of trying to burn his son to death had been given custody this horrible tragedy would have been averted. (!?) Now, I know many examples of kids of divorce who are a mess. Sure, plenty -- most even …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 02:51 PM
0

the garbage generation Is this supposed to be less batshit insane? Charles Rothenberg was divorced by his wife and confronted with the loss of the one love object of his life, his 6 year old son David. He kidnapped the boy and then, realizing the futility of his one-man revolt against the legal system which was about to take the boy back, made the desperate resolve to kill the boy and himself. He doused David with kerosene and set him afire but lost his nerve when it came his own turn. He fled a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 07:34 AM
2

Yes. Lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 07:03 PM
6

The reference implies that the poster was just saying lying in a PC way. Part of newspeak was the removal of unpleasantness from language. For example, dumb would be unsmart and idiot would be plusunsmart and biggest idiot would be doubleplusunsmart. The reference doesn't work because the poster was explaining the actual definition of lying, which requires purpose. There is a fundamental difference between someone telling you something that is wrong, and someone lying to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 06:45 PM
0

What does direct democracy have to do with women's suffrage? Pure Democracy/majority rule is precisely what goes on at a gang rape-- the majority holds a vote, the victim can vote, too--unless it is fettered by some ethical principle. Not the consititutionally limited democratic republic I know as America. Our form of government is not based on majority rule; it is based on fettered majority rule. It has an individual bill of rights, not a majority bill of rights. And even the rules for amending…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 09:51 AM
0

I dont believe in democracy and think universal suffrage is a bad thing So, to clarify this, you think women should not be allowed to vote?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 02:35 AM
1

the chromosome study is scientifically agnostic on the topic of reproduction rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 08:43 AM
7

I honestly do not know how upon seeing the man you love completely aroused from touching you and smelling you, you would say no to his advance. This is really not what people are discussing. If you never don't want to have sex then the discussion doesn't really apply to you. Most people have, at some point in their relationship, not been in the mood for sex. I don't get it, not saying "no" keeps a relationship alive, it keeps a healthy sexually dynamic between each. Sex is certainly an important…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/14 07:01 AM
3

Inclined to agree. It doesn't fit the narrative he originally put forth prior to the allegations.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/14 08:29 PM
2

Succint.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 01:56 AM
4

It's fascinating to hear with such authority from someone else about what I said. Listen, I know it's hard for you to accept this, but trust me, I didn't say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:29 PM
5

Now I'm saying? I never said anything before.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 05:45 PM
3

Well they should be arrested. As a resident in a foreign country with public health care I expect to receive the same care as a citizen. I pay taxes here like everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 05:08 PM
2

And yet some of us like chocolate and some of us like vanilla. I'm a big fan of 'it is what it is.' This is an area that I must admit, I'm not too sure that state of the art knows 'what it is.' I don't see much biological evidence at all of mankind as deterministic unspoolers like bees or ants. We choose what to value. Literally, within our highest level neural networks like constructs, how to weight the outputs of our lower level processing networks. We got stuff that apes don't have, which per…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 08:16 AM
2

This is the core problem with TRP and all of these grandiose metaphorical theories. The debate is rigged. If there is a SMP, it is full of human beings who are not anything like a colony of bees, with single 'goal' or 'wish' or 'need' or 'value' or even a unique 'a set of values.' We all seek out different things. All these idiotic debates are framed in the RP model of reality. When thinking of people as a 'them' makes their head hurt, they make the pain go away by calling them an 'it.' That all…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 03:24 AM
1

To my mind, it's both Agreed. But why do you think that RPers aren't relating to it the same way? I'm the one who started the first thread on this subject, and what I miss most is having some semblance of an emotionally/physically/mentally intimate experience. Well, I based my reply on the comments in the thread which specifically focused on the concept that you cannot negotiate attraction, which I agree with. However, while that is true, a lot of times a dead bedroom has nothing to do with attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/14 02:25 AM
7

Three billion human lives ended on August 29th, 2097. The survivors of the nuclear fire called the war Judgment Day. They lived only to face a new nightmare: the war against the sexbots. The computer which controlled the machines, Brazzers.net, sent two Sexbots back through time. Their mission: to destroy the leader of the human resistance, Ron Jeremy, my son. The first Sexbot was programmed to strike at me in the year 2069, before Ron was born. It failed. The second was set to strike at Ron him…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/14 04:18 AM
6

This is reasonable, but you have to understand that when people advocate talking they aren't trying to address the problem of "not enough sex." There are all kinds of things that couples can do to try and re-ignite passion in their relationship and I agree that sitting down and making a sex schedule is probably down at the bottom of what is helpful. Trying to ramp up your attractiveness in a LTR or marriage is not necessarily going to fix the problem, and it's not necessarily going to get you se…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/14 03:50 AM
3

This is because the relationship gets real/stale. This is where this whole line of reasoning goes off the rails for me. That can be one reason why, but it is not all possible reasons why. When you have sex with a fuck buddy, or have a ons it's primarily about getting your rocks off, mutual masturbation. When you have sex with your wife, or your fiance, or your serious girlfriend it's an intimate, emotional experience. The reason why I think RP has this all wrong is because they are trying to app…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/14 01:14 AM
1

Good work. Looks great
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/14 07:50 PM
7

The ages don't seem to be clear from the excerpts, but they seem to stretch across a long period of time--and are disturbing. As she grew, I took to bribing her for her time and affection: one dollar in quarters if I could do her makeup like a “motocycle chick.” Three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds. Whatever she wanted to watch on TV if she would just “relax on me.” Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying. I took …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 06:46 PM
10

My hyperbole was quite purposeful to illustrate how this could be framed, because it can be framed in many ways. Sans hyerbole, the one thing that legitimately concerns me is the seemingly abusive behavior that Lena laid out in her book. Her actions are closely comparable to those of a sexual predator--using bribes and tragedies to emotionally manipulate her sister into kissing her and touching her. I'm don't think people should seemingly shrug this off because it's Dunham and they like her poli…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 10:50 AM
15

I agree with this, but I am not going to defend Lena Dunham here. She would be last person to defend these actions if it wasn't herself. If this was a case of a 17 year old brother masturbating to his 10 year old sibling and bribing them with promises of candy for kisses, playing with their genitals, and emotional manipulating them into dependance the way she describes in her book, she would be pulling out the pitchforks. It's like when she berated that model for allowing R.Kelly to take picture…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/14 10:16 AM
2

My Aunt and Uncle are both laywers. Well, now my Aunt is a judge. They have three kids and have been happily married for over 20 years.
/r/RedPillWomen03/11/14 02:51 AM
1

Not my assertion, and I'm not sure I follow your analogy. Pick pocketing someone is clearly a crime. Talking to someone in public is by any stretch, a gray area, for constituting harassment. In some cases clear cut, in other cases not so much--and that varies by individual and contextual circumstances. It's not about the magnitude of harm, it's about the acceptability of the action. The first thread I read about this the OP noted that while she found the video upsetting she pointed out that she …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/14 06:36 AM
-1

Well, then, to be honest, framing this as a serious harassment issue is not the answer to that problem. The reality is that sexual, physical, and verbal abuse against women ~is~ a serious problem that causes intense and often times irreparable mental and physical damage. There is a huge mass of women who live in silent suffering every day at the hands of their abusers. Women who are beaten everyday, women who have been raped since they were children. There are tons of them, terrified to bring th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/14 04:08 AM
10

I rarely align myself with anything RP, and I've always considered myself fairly progressive, but this is issue is, frankly, ridiculous. A small anecdote. My last job I did contract work for the IT department on the women's unit at a mental health facility. While I rarely directly interacted with clients, I spent a good deal of time with the staff and analyzing the data that was collected for research. Sexual harassment and physical/sexual abuse against women is a very serious issue, a very prom…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/14 03:37 AM
3

True. The study on Y diversity certainly doesn't rule out an 80/20 model, but it doesn't verify it either as is often claimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/14 01:01 PM
2

http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1004064
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/14 12:44 PM
1

Has this really been conclusively proven?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/14 12:42 PM
2

Succinct; thank you for explaining my windbaggery.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 12:18 PM
4

Good post. I actually agree with a lot of it. Seems strange coming from trp though which in many ways is just the other side of the herdist coin and consistently shows blatant disregard and contempt for thinking about individual human beings as anything other than the groups they can be divided into.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 04:28 AM
3

Not my assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 04:13 AM
22

I don't think women are the same as men, but I do think that it is generally life's losers who focus intensely on the accomplishments/superiority of whatever 'group' they belong to. On average, we are average. No repealing that. There is a more capable half and a less capable half. I didn't say 'incapable'... I said less capable. They are all peers living in freedom... but they are not all peers in capability. That is just a simple damn fact, and the variations in capability stretch well past ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 07:22 PM
5

In a way I feel that TRP represents the Rooster, it is an ugly looking thing, crude direct language lacerating you at every turn, it may actually be insensitive to other people unlike themselves which is once again obvious in the manner they speak.... but is ultimately harmless and may even be beneficial to men seeking to understand relationships If you want to understand relationships, then have relationships. Earth shattering revelation. We'll just ignore it in our self flagellation over idiot…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 06:14 AM
1

practicing my programming I'm not going to say that this is a waste of time, but at some point it really is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 11:25 PM
3

The only effect social media has on my relationship is reminding us how old and uncool we are. Had dinner with my girlfriend's co-worker who is in her early 20s and she was going on and on about tinder and snapchat and occasionally we would just look at each other to make sure we were both totally confused and lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 09:26 PM
3

I mean that's true. However, some people are looking for more things in their relationship besides what makes their dick hard. Right? I mean, you may personally not care about what you SO's career is, but to me it's important. I don't want to marry someone who can't take care of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 04:02 PM
3

Well, I work in urology/surgical oncology and lots of men who have had prostate surgery experience what you're describing. The main difference is that you are forcibly stopping your muscles from pushing the ejaculate out, and their muscles simply don't work, but the result is the same. The reason you feel the need to pee is because your un-ejaculated semen doesn't flow back from your urethra into your balls (of course) but rather leaks into your bladder. I'm sure when you took a piss afterwards …
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 06:40 PM
2

Yes, but she was also talking about the traditional arrangement of gender roles, and framing things in such a way that 'marrying a man' and 'marrying an abuser' are identical statements. Not my understanding at all. Given the choice between starving to death and marrying into a bad situation a woman would choose marrying into a bad situation. They ~have~ to get married to survive, and ultimately, some of them will end up staying in abusive relationships because they have no other option except d…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/14 10:35 AM
4

Jesus H. Christ on a popsicle. Her point was articulated too well for this shitty hyperbole to stick. Sophistry aside, she was clearly talking about marriages that are abusive/unwanted, as in, being forced to spend your entire life in servitude to someone--not just marrying 'a' man. There is really no confusion about that. She was also not comparing the suffering of women to men, but framing it that way sure does make you sound like you're refuting something she said. Either you didn't actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/14 05:57 AM
12

I've always found RPW to be far more reasonable than TRP, but occasionally I always stumble across something that makes me shake my head. Just casually reading, Here's a tip: don't go to grad school. You're only going to further limit the pool of partners you will be happy with because of your hypergamy I just...I mean, fuck...seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/14 05:28 AM
3

Have to? Why? Do you or the organization in charge give the small cash stipends out of the goodness of their heart? Is it a moral obligation? Why do you NEED to pay people? Uh...does this really need to be explained to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 11:34 PM
2

when bpers misunderstand a concept and use it as the basis of their criticisms, it can irk me too. Right, but you have to understand that their confusion comes from how RPers use the phrase, which is consistently and with little to no exception to denounce moral criticism for tactics like deception, manipulation, lying, and infidelity. It is literally a catch-all phrase to dismiss moral concerns over endorsed sexual strategies by framing everything through an amoral lens. It basically allows one…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 07:29 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4EDhdAHrOg
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 06:03 PM
5

What is the point of making this statement though. Obviously the concept is amoral, just like a rock is amoral. I'm sorry, but everytime I see someone from RP make the "sexual strategy is amoral" claim it is generally right before they say something abhorrent. It's like someone running around throwing rocks at people's heads while screaming "rocks are amoral!" There was a thread posted by a TRPEndorsed poster saying you should fuck other people's SOs because sexual strategy is amoral. So let's n…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 05:57 PM
1

I see. So sort of a double standard for double standards. =)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 03:47 PM
9

I don't think anyone is necessarily entitled to anything specific in a marriage. People set their own standards about what they expect from their partner in their marriage, and in that sense they are entitled only to dissolve the marriage if those expectations are not met.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 02:03 PM
3

Double standards are only hypocritical if the two groups being compared are equivalent in the relevant respects. TRP does not believe that male and female sexual preferences and tastes are perfectly equivalent, hence, there is no hypocrisy in acting accordingly. You might debate whether that belief is founded in truth, but only the belief is required to avoid the charge of hypocrisy. As long as we are painting TRP with broad strokes, the hypocrisy of TRP accepting a double standard here should b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 12:40 PM
0

It's taboo, not because there is anything wrong with choosing to be a housewife, but because it is wrong to tell individuals how to freely live their lives in the west.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 03:32 PM
1

They are terrible. Green and blue text on green background...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 12:48 AM
11

I am arguing the same by stating that dread game is and has always been the theoretical analogue to women's dread. Except that not wanting to have sex with someone who pissed you off is not necessarily a 'game.' There isn't a forum filled with women discussing when to withhold sex from men, and if there was, then it would certainly be of the same vein. I guess I'm failing to see your point by pointing out that women can manipulate men by withholding sex. Yes they can, but it can also, and probab…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/14 10:18 PM
12

This is total miss the point nonsense. The fundamental principle of TRP is that it ~is~ a strategy. It's is one thing to have a natural response to an action, as in your girlfriend pisses you off so you don't want to be around her. That isn't a strategy, that is a natural human response to someone being a fucking asshole. It literally has nothing to do with TRP. Ditto, not wanting to have sex with someone who recently pissed you off. It's entirely another thing to withhold sex / instill dread on…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/14 09:43 PM
5

RPers write the definitions as it's our theory. The problem with this is that RP theory is drenched in hyperbole and often references itself as sources, which leads to all kinds of irrational claims of 'facts.' I'd rather see the theories presented from a more objective lens.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/14 02:31 AM
8

This makes a lot more sense. Thanks for doing this research.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/14 02:41 PM
3

To be fair, I have seen a fair amount of people in TRP deride cheating. It is difficult to separate the 'teachings' of TRP with the interpretation of those teachings by its members, which seem to be quite varied.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/14 02:38 PM
1

My point is... when slavery was no longer needed for competition. It died out. The justification for the expansion of Pax Britannia was the abolition of world slavery, including especially antagonism toward muslim states that practiced it. Literally, a 'crusade' against world slavery. Clearly, the abolition of slavery was a good thing, but a good thing which started only after Britain lost the American colonies, in the early 1800s... The British fleet patrolled the coast of Africa, intercepting …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/14 04:53 AM
6

Well, I wouldn't cheat on my SO. I'd just end the relationship and then be free to sleep with whoever I want. To me, it's not about sex, it's about trust. I would never be able to trust my SO, which is important to me. That's just me though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 07:03 PM
0

I'll clarify because we don't agree. His argument is patriarchy/slavery/etc existed as a necessary construct for survival. My argument is that it is based on the atavistic tribal/herd survival wiring left over from jungles left long ago. It is rooted in survival in a throwback to atavistic primoridial ooze, Jungle, herd, and even tribal days. We survive, partly, by extracting information from noisy pictures. Like, there is the lion in the grass. Or, there is the bleeding Madonna in the loaf of r…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 06:52 PM
7

Cheating is a deal-breaker for me. I don't think there is really anything that could be done to make me want to stay with a person who cheated on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 06:08 PM
2

Right. I agree. And? I guess I'm confused. Are you responding to something I've said. Let me clarify. I don't think being an abusive asshole is mutually exclusive to casual sex, nor do I think that it is a requirement in that arrangement. It is a completely orthogonal concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:58 PM
2

I don't disagree with that. Where are you going with this exactly? It's entirely possible to be an abusive asshole in a committed monogamous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:34 PM
0

We're arguing advantage. Necessity. Survival. Patriarchy was essential for civilization. Until a certain age in human history when technology changed everything. After that, the status of women sprang up to equality within a hundred or so years. I don't fully disagree that it is rooted in survival, but it is not defacto about survival. I think that is partly atavistic genetic wiring; survival of the herd/tribe. Statism, classism, sexism, tribalism, it's all the same deeply atavistic herd mentali…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 05:03 PM
6

Sometimes people like to have casual sex, even women, and if someone in my family was having casual sex then I wouldn't have a problem with that. On the other hand if you were deceptive about the nature of your relationship then I would punch you in the mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 03:55 PM
1

While I think this is an obvious troll, the logic here illuminates the danger of thinking of people as groups rather than individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 02:10 AM
1

You can believe that the Red Pill is 'The' Truth. Reality impacts that process. For example, my experience leads me to believe that the Red Pill is primarily made up of bullshit with a few good tips buried in the poop. Other's experience leads them to believe otherwise. On average, we are average. And that is the unavoidable source of drag on our expectations of, not just our romantic partners, but people in general. Ability, honor, height, weight, intelligence, compassion for others, wealth, ad…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 01:48 AM
5

I kissed her and grabbed her pussy, told her it was my pussy now. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/14 09:23 PM
4

I generally find people who say these things have never actually been in a serious relationship. Looks are certainly important, I am not going to deny that I care about it, but there is a reason that George Clooney married an intelligent, sexy 38 year old lawyer and not a 22 year old dumb as bricks blonde bartender. People who place no value on intelligence, kindness or sense of humor, either do so because they can't (as in, they suck), or because they have never had to spend 2 years living with…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/14 02:47 PM
1

I really disagree with this. In humans, for example, the value of self-preservation is not absolute; it can and does regularly fail(suicide), as do many of those high level 'value' seeking models. Is suicide a failure of a higher level neural net, or a sign of humankinds ability to truly rewire our basic neural net/value seeking circuitry, inserting our high highest value seeking neural net that sometimes concludes "my highest value is achieved by shutting down." A dogs set of values would be si…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/14 02:26 PM
5

I read a little of RP. Have yet to see anything remotely like science. The models of human behavior are child like imitations, what one would expect if someone stumbled into an advanced mathematics course, copied what they saw on the board with little understanding, and ran off to put on a pony show, largely devoid of anything like uncertainty analysis or actual calibration. The use of n-count instead of partner count--they use 'n' in science right? Once you get beyond the simplistic banalities,…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/14 05:47 PM
4

Well, I don't see why you wouldn't let her crash at your place unless its a major inconvenience to you. Letting her stay at your place at least opens up the opportunity to make something happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/14 07:46 PM
3

Who said women aren't funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/14 03:10 AM
7

That was my interpretation of the story. “Well yeah but I didn’t really WANT sex from them”, Mark lies Maybe you are right though, maybe he wanted sex and to love them. There are actions that express love and those can be given away freely. There is a fundamental difference between genuine expressions of love and actions that mimic those expressions. One is rooted in an emotion, the other is rooted in manipulation and deceit. The fact that Mark is so quick to proclaim that he loves a girl, and p…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/14 05:05 PM
9

“Well I saw the chance for sex with you and I didn’t want to mess that up by giving away love too soon”, says Mark. Okay, I almost spit out my coffee at this line. LOL Really though this reads like a 13 year old tried to write some RP fan fiction. Love isn't 'given' away, love is an emotion that takes time to build with another person, and it's obvious from reading this that Mark--as unrealistic a character that he is--was not giving away 'his love' like some love slut, but saying that he loved …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/14 12:50 PM
0

You've asserted that "marriage implies ownership," in the context of a debate over whether or not one partner can do something against the other partner's will (i.e. grab their tits/vagina/dick/ or have sex with them / or punch them in the face)--to wit, the use of force in order to harass them. I just argued the very opposite--that marriage implies a commitment to ongoing mutual cooperation. Is this what passes for reading comprehension these days?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/14 02:56 AM
2

I hope not. If I did, my apologies. If that was interpreted like that, then I'll be damned. Are you responding to something even remotely like anything I've ever written? We all know exactly what differentiates an act of love from an act of rape, and that element is precisely 'force.' Forced association is ugly in all its forms. Are you truly uncertain about whether mankind should embrace rape, force, etc as an acceptable form of human interaction with a loved one or anyone for that matter? Hard…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/14 02:12 AM
8

Well, everyone has their own personal feelings about what a marriage constitutes. To me marriage is public declaration of lifelong commitment to another person. To me that implies an agreement to mutually cooperate--not unilateral dictatorship over another persons life. That certainly means you share your life with another person, but you also have an obligation to your partner to respect their life as well as your own. That obligation is to treat your partner living in freedom and sharing your …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/14 09:39 PM
14

To me this is roughly analogous to a woman saying she wants to take $1000 from the joint bank account to buy something, the husband saying no, her taking it anyway and him charging her with theft. Seriously? This would imply that when you marry someone you own them. As far as I'm concerned even though someone is your wife/husband they are still an individual with individual human rights. Sure you are a couple, but that doesn't give you the right to do whatever you want to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/14 06:25 PM
1

Wow, seriously great explanation. 99% of the abstract went way over my head. I learned something today. Thank you. Enjoy some gold.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 02:29 AM
2

I would have to agree that this is likely the source of our atavistic revulsion to promiscuity. There used to be a time when frequenting pros was nominally frowned upon. Today when someone gets 'Johned' in the paper, it's high fives all around. Except by the partner whose trust(and future health)is violated. "Guess what, dear? You and I just swapped biologicals with everybody that I've ever slept with! Enjoy!" Hundreds of thousands of years, lots of tribal biological tribal experiments. That alm…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/14 04:42 PM
59

I don't have a phd in genetics, but isn't this studying saying that low levels of Y chromosome diversity cannot be solely explained by the neutral process--effective population size of males being reduced relative to females (i.e. more women reproducing than men). Your theory: This could result from neutral processes if the effective population size of males is reduced relative to females due to a higher variance in the number of offspring from males than from females. Conclusion of the study: H…
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 03:06 PM
4

I did not realize that, but I became interested in modelling during my salad days in Engineering, specifically while taking control systems and economics during the same semester I noticed a distinct difference in what constituted a working model. One bit of strawman, and then I'm done. On the topic of the unknowable, I have always felt that it is entirely reasonable to say "I don't know." Thank you for your post; it was a good one, I learned something.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/14 03:18 AM
9

You have to have a theory of truth in order to determine if an idea is false No you don't. Plenty of theories are proven incorrect without a substitute theory being proven. Not too long ago I recall reading a post--I can't remember if it was on the TRP subreddit or if it was on one of the blogs that consistently post to, but it contained some theory which opined the three types of women who don't wear heels: feminists, fat girls and...something else. Is it really necessary to come up with a list…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/14 02:36 AM
3

I used to be a white knight when I was younger Color me shocked. It's almost like this is some group of men who let women take advantage of them and now they have created this world where "some/most/all?" of these women are miserable and desperately looking for that man that they once were. Relying on anecdotal evidence has and continues to be a successful strategy. It's almost like people's life experiences are relevant (used by science too btw!) and helpful to others. Except that TRP is not in…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 07:50 PM
6

My argument is simply that the above diatribe is nonsense rooted in nothing more than anecdotes about people's sisters and Saturday evenings at the local bar. It is, with incredible irony, a fantasy reality created by men who are angry that women paid them no attention and so they have created a world in which the women who rejected them are now sad lonely dried up hookers who are desperately looking for the man they once were before they swallowed the pill. Women in their 30s who are single are…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 07:16 PM
5

RP says men and women are different and complimentary and not cogs in a machine. It merely states that there are common characteristics that women share and can be acted upon. That's about it. Maybe that's what you want TRP to be, but it isn't. Remember men, Unless you are a hawt guy in the top 10-20% or looks, you are 100% worthless to women during the prime of their life, and it's your job to support them and to support civilization while they fuck hot guys and humiliate you, then after that, …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 04:08 PM
4

I have no doubt that there are people on TRP who do not subscribe to the more ridiculous aspects that are preached there-in fact I would say that is where the best posts on TRP come from. However, I am judging TRP based on what I have seen consistently upvoted, what is on the sidebar, and what is posted by certified contributors. The problem is that TRP does none of the things you just said about teaching. TRP doesn't teach general ideas, TRP fills in all the details and all the nuances about ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 03:14 PM
15

The major problem with this is that the nuance you describe is seriously lost on the vast majority of the sub. TRP teaches some things that are very valuable, and in a meta sense I agree with the core principle of TRP that women like men to be...men. You should be confident, assertive, and recognize your own value as a man. I think many men who post there have been abused by the subset of women you describe. They felt they had no value, and attempted to 'win' a woman over by bringing external va…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 05:00 AM
4

I rarely say this kind of thing, but this might be the dumbest post I've ever read. People work in order to survive, you need money to buy...food and shelter. I don't get up in the morning and go to work because I want to get laid, I get up in the morning and go to work because I actually like my job, I find the work to be interesting, and I need money to survive. Second of all, plenty of women work and contribute to society. I work with a woman right now who built the control system for the sof…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 04:33 AM
6

As someone with a background in science and engineering I am inclined to agree...somewhat. Soft sciences like psychology, economics, etc. use the tools of science but often lack the rigor required to make the conclusions they do. That said, even if you think economics is unscientific, it would be hard to argue that economies don't exist. It's fair to say that we don't have a hard scientific ability to measure intelligence objectively. I think it's quite the stretch to claim that intelligence doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 05:39 PM
2

Haha. I found this video to be hilarious. At the same time, I also think it's sad that some people are actually carrying this chart around with them and rigorously plotting data points.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 04:23 PM
2

I would say the scientific consensus on the current state of the species is that we are generally monogamous compared to most other species. I would also say that there is plenty of evidence of promiscuity in our evolutionary history. There is genetic evidence, as you have pointed out, and there is also physiological evidence, as your previous article pointed out--relative human testis sizes fall somewhere in-between chimpanzees (fully promiscuous) and gorillas (fully monogamous). We are neither…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 03:53 PM
1

Right...and? You said it's debated, then said humans conditioned themselves to be pair-bonding and said Monogamy is a societal construct, then posted a link which doesn't support your statement and in fact says your claim is factually incorrect. What am I missing here? Am I supposed to be reading it in a special way, like should I have inserted the phrase, "and here is a link which proves me wrong." Are you debating with yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 02:50 PM
2

Your link doesn't say this. Perhaps you should actually read the article as it specifically states that the extremist theory of monogamy being purely a social construct is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 05:53 AM
2

This. Also, I don't think there is anything wrong with talking about your grief with friends and family. It's healthy. As someone who has lost a lot of family I can tell you that it's a lot easier to pretend your emotions don't exist than it is to deal with them.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 09:23 PM
5

Wait a second. You run a business and you think that a homeless guy who takes charity from people and then gives that to other homeless people is 'doing' something?
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 02:08 AM
26

This is what happens when statistics are interpreted by retards. 50% of marriages may end in divorce, but people who get divorced tend to...get divorced again. So, while 50% of marriages end in divorce, it's the a smaller subset of people consistently getting divorced. I would say that men don't file for divorce because they, generally, have more to lose, not because they are at fault. A man in an unhappy relationship is more likely to stick it out because he stands to lose his children and a lo…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 04:19 PM
1

When you frame the social safety net discussion as being about abuse, feminists basically use it as a justification to move the majority of funding to womens' shelters. Most of these ideologues would rather close a shelter than take in male victims. A social safety net is certainly not only about abuse. How has the discussion been framed around that? If we are talking specifically about abuse and social safety nets then yes there is a valid reason why women's shelters exist. The fact of the matt…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 03:39 PM
1

Keep building that stawman. What is this a youtube comments page? That's an argument for a better social safety net for all genders. It sure is. I won't play this feminist game where you drag out a sob story of some women who have it particularly bad, and had no options, and then use it to basically argue that men who have no options should go fuck themselves. I didn't say men should go fuck themselves. I won't play this feminist game where you drag out a sob story of some women who have it part…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 02:46 PM
6

I think another factor that plays into this is that men and women are generally looking for different things on an online dating site. Granted, I don't have any scientific basis for saying this, just my own personal experience, but men I know who are on dating websites are content looking for both casual sex and dating. Women I know who are on dating websites are looking for dating only. If I were recently single and on a dating website right now I would definitely be looking to bang some 20 yea…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 01:59 PM
4

Because any study that isn't PC is impossible to get funding for. It's also hard to get funding for studies that are stupid
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 05:37 AM
2

God damn this is a fucked up viewpoint. While not all abuse victims suffer from PTSD it can cause serious mental health issues, and A and B are not the only options, in certain cases abuse does create a situation where a person becomes entrapped by their own mental processes. It's pretty fucking cold, and honestly pretty idiotic to expect any person, regardless of gender, who has undergone long-term systematic abuse to be able to pick themselves up by the bootstraps. During my brief stint doing …
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 04:49 AM
5

My cousin has Williams Syndrome. I am surprised your mother knew about the syndrome before you were born. My cousin is younger than you and Williams' syndrome was not part of a basic CVS screening. Anyway, my cousin is pretty cool, very sociable young man.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 03:39 PM
2

I think what's missing from this analysis is that people in Baltimore are not the only people who watch football.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 03:31 PM
2

Ad impressions pay almost nothing, it's click-through that generates revenue. All those views probably amount to less than 25 cents.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 12:15 AM
3

1 is more than enough to separate this sub from other self-help subs. Self-improvement leads to self-confidence and the recognition of your own value. Beta men believe they have no inherent value and are lucky to be with a woman and must do everything she asks in order to provide her with extraneous value outside of himself. Alpha men recognize their own self-worth, have confidence within themselves, and that is what women are attracted to. Helping other men realize their own value and how that …
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 05:45 AM
5

idk about this one. For me, I find the best sex is when you're both enjoying it, and if she doesn't like assplay then she isn't going to be enjoying it. Everyone has their boundaries.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 02:34 PM
0

The NFL is under no obligation to employ this guy. He worked hard for something, fucked up and got fired. Happens everyday.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 05:29 AM
14

I did some IT contracting work a few years ago for a mental hospital, specifically in the women's mental health unit helping researchers doing data acquisition. By and large the vast majority of rapes from that population were committed by a family member or someone close to the victim. Very few rapes were committed by a stranger, and even less were committed only once. Rape claims from one-night stands, etc., were by and large fringe events, which makes this intense focus on stranger-danger rap…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 06:10 AM
2

If she has her first period at 9, and another girl has her first period at 15, isn't the girl who has her period at 9 as sexually mature as the one who had her period at 15? Yes. And? The issue is not physical sexual maturity. The issue is consent and the mental ability to give consent. A 15 year old is far more mentally mature than a 9 year old. Is it wrong for an 18 year old to have sex with a 15 year old? I don't think so, but it would be wrong for an 18 year to have sex with a 9 year old. Ag…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 01:37 AM
6

Uh, no. That's fucked up. Average age for consent would then be 12 years old, and some girls get their period as young as 8 or 9. Do you think it would be okay for a 40 year old to have sex with a 9 year old?
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 03:49 PM
1

What is my bias? How have I misrepresented your statements? You said there was a bigger picture due to several factors, which I pointed out do not shed light on the picture at all. If you can answer those questions I'll accept my irrationality. Until then you are just typing words that have no basis. I also did not say you believe anything, merely what the sub purports to be true.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/14 04:01 PM
1

I don't think I've shown any bias in my analysis as I haven't made any positive claim about anything. I don't dismiss the possibility that the majority of women are having sex with a small minority of men. I just don't see any actual scientific evidence of that either way. In your example you created a situation where a minority of the male population had sexual access to the majority of the female population. isn't that what the 80/20 rule is trying to prove? I used both the example where the m…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 07:15 PM
1

Most value, overwhelmingly, by its nature, is transitory. It has a finite life. It decays, it ages, it rusts, it fades, it wears, it depreciates. If this really was a One Pie World, then The Pie would have long been gone. But, most value is renewable; by effort. There are all kinds of value in the world, and they are constantly changing. Including, the value that someone is going to freshly create tomorrow morning, anew, as we all must, in a Universe in which most value is transient and fleeting…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 04:21 PM
19

Jesus Christ. This woman should never be allowed near those children again.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 01:50 PM
1

Folks are free to create value everyday, either at-risk (i.e. self-employed, start-up venture, etc), or for guaranteed ROI (i.e. wages). If you create a value out of thin air, (ie, convert a blank disk into a disk with value on it, or concieve of a new way to process signals/move information from point A to point B, or imagine a new service, or method of processing silicone into bulbous breasts, or whatever, to the extent that value is valued, so will it attract value in the exchange of value fo…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 01:00 PM
2

I did not say it didn't correlate to behavior, but the only behavior it correlates to is have multiple sexual partners. I didn't say that it disproves or proves it one way or another. My opinion is that it says nothing about it at all. Let's say you had a hypothetical island where we take the biological risk of infection to the extreme. Women are 100% guaranteed to contract HIV from sex and men are 100% guaranteed not to contract HIV from sex. There are 100 people, 50 men with 1 infected with HI…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 12:26 PM
1

Yes there is. I don't even know why that needs to be explained. There are fundamental cultural differences between wasps and black's, does that s suddenly make being prejudice against black people okay?
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 12:06 PM
4

This reads like some bullshit out of a Sociology 101 class. Value is entirely subjective and our ability to evaluate the value of the things around us, whether it be people, property, investments, or anything under the sun has it's own consequences. Saying that everyone evaluates women based mostly on their physical appearance is far more sexist and prejudice than any piece of art ever drawn.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 01:38 AM
-2

That doesn't make any sense. If one population is 10x more likely to catch a disease they can have 10x less opportunities for infection and see the same rate of infection as the less susceptible population. one partner per night: 2^365 = 7.5 x 10^109 = 75 followed by 108 zeros... one partner per week: 2^52 = 4503 trillion opportunities = guaranteed saturation one partner per month: 2^12 = 4096 opportunities one partner per quarter: 2^4 = 16 opportunities, at some rate of success/failure It is ju…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 11:37 PM
-4

This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read. So, whenever someone gets a job that means that there is one less job to give anybody else ever. If you add up all the employment opportunities in America, it must equal M1. If only we were more like Iran overflowing with all those economic opportunities. This is not, never was, and will never be, a One Pie World.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 10:26 PM
4

That's because people who get divorced tend to get divorced several times.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 04:36 AM
7

Good work. Pro-tip: movies are always a shit idea for a date. They are way too long to use as a build-up for foreplay, and it can be awkward to transition from total silence to sex. If you must use the TV then watch a short episode of something. You'll encounter much less LMR if you are actually engaging the girl before sex.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 11:54 AM
5

I think I was lucky that I got good advice from my old man about women. In college I had a lot of confidence and being a generally good looking guy had a lot of success with not much effort. However, I became very meek after University due to some serious personal issues. I was depressed, un-motivated, and as a corollary became extremely self-conscious and beta-y. I had a small relationship during that period and I just cringe at my behavior. At one point the girl I was with said that she was ti…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 10:57 AM
14

I'm so confused by this story. You started an open relationship last year, then your girl slept with some dudes, you turned your entire life around, your girl totally worships you and says you can sleep with other girls. Since you were in an open relationship, doesn't that mean that you already could sleep with other girls? I don't understand. There is a plot hole in this story.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 10:12 AM
1

Thank you for the child-rearing advice. Allow me to rephrase this so you understand my point which appears to have flown over your head. 1] It is adults who speak to their babies in a 'baby-voice.' 2] Thus speaking ~to~ someone in a baby voice in no-way re-enforces the idea the the speaker is a baby. If you were to speak to someone in a baby voice it would be the receiver of the message who would be the baby.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 04:34 PM
7

you also reinforce for her that men are babies to be coddled That doesn't even make sense. You talk to a baby in a baby voice. Babies don't talk.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 04:19 AM
1

I agree with this. Also most women don't really find guys who are overly-jacked attractive. Being in-shape is definitely a plus, but your haircut, how you dress, etc also play big factors in the attractiveness category. At some point you get diminishing returns and even negative returns from becoming too muscular.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 01:08 AM
6

Also how the fuck does her vagina being...a regular vagina reduce her reproductive 'potential?' (w/e that means). I'm not following the comparison between boo.com and her vagina. She didn't have some fucked up monster vagina.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 03:54 PM
0

Dude, you and your relationship with your gf who you claim to treat as an equal proves nor disproves jack. Anecdotal, and most likely juvenile in experience. Nearly the entire basis of both RP/BP is anecdotal experience. Are you claiming to have some objective evidence that: 1] All women are sexually submissive 2] All women want to be led around by the nose 3] All men like to be sexually dominant 4] All men like to be leaders You won't be able to, because you can't, because evolutionary psycholo…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 03:08 PM
1

I mostly agree. Tough day at work--I might mention it but not really expect much in return. I think that often it's not bad to mention problems you're having as long as you believe that you can solve them. In fact, I've found this to be incredibly effective because you can demonstrate you are able to solve problems in your life. Your girlfriend needs to know that you can cope with daily stressors and you aren't going to fall apart. So while it's not necessarily an issue to share with them, it is…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 03:48 AM
-2

When it comes down to it Jewish people can be extremely racist Be careful, this vortex of irony is sucking us all in.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 03:32 PM
10

I think that the people who obsess over these details are still learning how to red pill. It's like training wheels on a bike before you learn how to ride. Ultimately, at some point if you want to have a real relationship with someone you have to poop out the red pill and take what you learned from your digestion with you. Ultimately the 'alpha' behaviors involved with the TRP help people see their own intrinsic value as a man and gain confidence within their own skin. This shows men that their …
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 02:09 PM
11

We are all just animals. No relationship is guaranteed, most end terribly, but sometimes not always.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 09:36 PM
9

God, this place is infested with angry virgins looking for tips to get laid. TRP has many good principles that can be applied in various ways to different situations, but sometimes I feel that it is becoming this weird cult comprised of angry ex-betas who are mad at women because they wouldn't touch their beta penises. General wisdom about dating people from a similar background is that there is less conflict in a potential relationship with respect to things like culture, values and money. For …
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 09:21 PM
3

Well since this is an ad campaign and people are taking about it I'd say it's working.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 12:37 PM
0

I think what you've written here is very, very true. Boundaries are very important to maintaining power balance in a relationship. However, this is really just a bad example to illustrate establishing boundaries because in any relationship--professional, platonic, romantic, there has to be some give and take at the edges of those boundaries. I don't like chick flicks, but on Valentines day I'm not going to put my girlfriend through the ringer because she wants to watch one. The mature thing to d…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 12:11 PM
4

Have to agree. Every now and then there is a great post, and there was one recently that got me to re-sub, but the mass majority of posts are by children boasting about how they didn't do something a girl asked them and calling that 'game.' Hohoho my girlfriend asked me to do her a favor but I told that bitch to fuck off, I'm so alpha right now. Sitting in the corner drinking alone, talking to a person who is paid to talk to you, while everyone else is having a good time is not 'alpha,' it's asb…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:26 AM
3

The main difference between LTR and plates for me is the fear of emotional investment. Just like when you start spinning plates and you get anxiety over approaching women, entering into a LTR comes with commitment anxiety. When spinning plates anxiety and fear comes from the pain associated with rejection. With a LTR the anxiety and fear comes from the pain of losing a connection with someone you care about and are emotionally invested in. When you lose a plate its no big deal, but when you lose…
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 07:09 PM
25

It was a good tale. Really though I have a hard time believing this.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 12:02 PM
3

You are being way too passive. You're asking her too many questions and forcing her to take control of the situation. She asked you if you wanted to meet in person or not and rather than say what you wanted to do you just deferred the decision to her. Be clear. Be decisive. Don't dance around what you are trying to say. If you want to fuck this girl or whatever then take her out and show her a good time. Obviously she wants to re-connect, but you have to take control from here. She reached out, …
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 03:50 AM
5

This isn't good advice. In a strong relationship you can depend on each other when you need it. That is really what you should be looking for in a relationship, not one where you are just supporting the other person--that is some blue pill shit.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 08:21 PM
9

First of all who jacks off for a whole hour every day? Second of all, people don't work 24/7. Everyone needs downtime and if you weren't masturbating you'd be doing something else unproductive, like posting essays on reddit at 1:00AM. Plenty of people are highly productive and still find time to masturbate, watch movies and TV, hang out with friends and family. If you aren't getting shit done it isn't because you spent your evening after work watching porn, it's because you are unmotivated and l…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 04:45 PM
2

You do realize this is all scripted right?
/r/TheRedPill12/08/14 04:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter