The continued profitable success of a modern feedlot is dependent on a combination of a number of factors:
- good management;
- a favourable economic climate;
- relative freedom from epidemics of disease;
- changes in the costs of inputs such as feed;
- changes in the price received for the final product.
These are the definitions of successful feedlot health management for Beef CAFO's.
The objectives for our Brave New World Order's Sheeple Feedlot Health Management System are a little bit different...and a lot more profitable for the Corporate-Government Complex that manages our Sheeple CAFO -- otherwise known as "Society."
- Absolute control and total surveillance management of the herd;
- A totally controlled and manipulated economic climate;
- Regular maintenance treatments for epidemics of easily preventable diseases;
- Changes in the costs of inputs such as feed;
- Changes in the price received for the final product.
In beef CAFO's, the end goal is to get the cattle to slaughter at their maximum weight and as free of disease as possible.
In our Global Sheeple Feedlot, the end goal is to get the sheeple to eat the GMO man-made feed long enough to develop health issues for which the sheeple will then require treatment from the feedlot's veterinarian staff -- aka our "healthcare industry."
In beef CAFO's, the owners must pay for the feed, veterinarian services and other inputs to realize a profit.
In the sheeple feedlot, the owners get We the Sheeple to pay for our confinement, pay for our feed and pay for our own treatment that comes from the conditions of that confinement.
Sheeple CAFO's are far more efficient and profitable.
Now, since the Sheeple Feedlot is largely a mental construct, the kommisars of our mass media culture still need to convince the sheeple to stay within the confines of the feedlot. The easiest way to do this, of course, is to apply the most successful tactic in the dialectical social engineering playbook: divide and conquer.
Right vs. Left. Conservative vs. Liberal. Republican vs. Democrat. You know the drill.
First you get one "side" to propose a new idea, and the other side appears to oppose it...oftentimes vehemently and with a great show of principled outrage.
Than several years later, after a round or two of the so-called election cycle, the 'other' side appropriates the formerly opposed platform and passes it without even token resistance from it's supporters.
Remember the so-called anti-war movement when Bush was President?
Remember when Bush passed the largest increase in socialized medicine legislation...."free" prescription drugs for medicare/medicaid recipients?
Well, now we have "Obamacare" which is now supposedly opposed by the "conservatives." It's all a charade. Obamacare is everything the big business stooges of the 'right' have been trying to get passed for decades now - aka an insurance cartel that mandates all Sheeple in the American feedlot MUST buy the insurance policy. "Obamacare" is a right wing initiative appropriated by the 'left.'
Sound ludicrous? Check this out:
The mandate, requiring every American to purchase health insurance, appeared in a 1989 published proposal by Stuart M. Butler of the conservative Heritage Foundation called "Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans," which included a provision to "mandate all households to obtain adequate insurance."
The Heritage Foundation "substantially revised" its proposal four years later, according to a 1994 analysis by the Congressional Budget Office. But the idea of an individual health insurance mandate later appeared in two bills introduced by Republican lawmakers in 1993, according to the non-partisan research group ProCon.org. Among the supporters of the bills were senators Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who today oppose the mandate under current law….
In 2007, a bi-partisan Senate bill authored by Senators Bob Bennett, R-Utah, and Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, contained a mandate….
In 2010, Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that put into place an individual mandate.
LEFT, LEFT, LEFT, RIGHT, LEFT
The managers of our feedlot wear two different colored uniforms. Some wear red, some wear blue. Whichever one is currently overseeing our corner of the Feedlot is really inconsequential, as their management systems they choose to use to control the herd will be implemented, with a majority of the herd convinced that they had a hand in making the decision.
