Patriarchy is what built civilization. Feminists can whine about it, but without it none of this would be here. None. There would be no time for them to whine, they would be raising kids and scrambling for food. All. The. Time. Until they, like most people, die in their 30s if they make it through childhood.
They would not outlive men.
That little fact is a recent product of civilization. The Greeks wrote about women dying younger. Even the idea that women are the hardier sex is merely a product of civilization too.
Matriarchy never gets above the level of grass huts. Any society that embraces it gets destroyed, subjugated or collapses. People may not like that truth, but history bears it out.
Some have posited that virtual sex, sexbots and artificial wombs would eventually replace women.
What would that world be like?
It would not be the shining betatopia that men think it would be.
In our own society a competitive sexual market place propped up by the labors of the betas, without the benefits of a suitable mate (even if they are able to get sex) and by suitable mate I mean reproductive surety (the kid is theirs) and a reassuring pair bond (ie someone they actually like being mated to and do not have to fear abandonment and resource theft.) This has less to do with looks over the long run than it has to do with personality. Why when looks are so important to sexual desire? Looks always fade. At some point in a union the man is in there for loyalty alone and if the woman, like typical women in our culture, is an entitled shrew all the man has is misery and suffering in his union.
So what is the result of this? The same as it has been in other cultures that have done this (Rome, Babylon, the list goes on). Men start to drop out of marriage (Rome made it mandatory for men because of this). They stop being productive (It got so bad Rome made jobs hereditary. Think of you doctor or lawyer getting the job based on birth alone . . .). The suicide rate climbs as it is in the West right now. I would guess everyone reading this blog has heard of a couple young men related to people they know that have committed suicide in the last three months. Think about that for a moment.
Take women out of the equation. Eliminate them entirely is some reverse feminism act on their fish/bike nonsense. What would men do?
Would they really scramble to create things when they have cheap virtual porn or sexbots that can be made to look like any woman? A perfect ten without the shit tests, without the costs associated with being with her? Would they really choose to raise children? Perhaps when they are 40, but many by then would be comfortable with not having children. Some would, but it would be a sharper population decline than before.
Look at what most great seducers do in their lives? They scrape by generally because they know they don’t need money to seduce women. Most men would take this direction with readily available sex that was as good (or better) than a real woman.
Would not men become the Lotus Eaters out of the Odyssey?
Of course they would.
The sad reality is that without the competition for women, many of the accomplishments of men would never have occurred.
Most women as they are today are a curse. In the past they were a mixed blessing, but they are a necessary one.
