The Daily Mail has a picture of the white rioter shot and critically wounded in Ferguson, and he is surrounded by a few other whites who have the typical anarchist getup of masks and hoods. The police did not open fire that night, so the logical conclusion is that he was shot by another protester during the disturbances, perhaps in self-defense.
Ferguson police chief Thomas Jackson blamed much of the mayhem on white anarchists, saying that they were rejecting peace and provoking black youths to violence:
In an exclusive interview with msnbc, Jackson said his fear is not of the understandably angry residents, but “the anarchists that are coming in, the people that don’t want healing, the people that just want to continue to fight.”
“Those are the people I’m concerned about,” he said.
In the meanwhile, anarchists are organizing mayhem online, condemning all who urge peace and calm.
This brings me back to the subject of today’s earlier piece: Jack Dorsey.
Dorsey, a filthy rich billionaire, is a known anarchist sympathizer who coordinates his activities from a clifftop compound in the San Francisco area. Not content to enjoy his loot in peace, he has joined the Ferguson riots in support of dead robber Michael Brown. It is fitting, actually, that he is fighting the little bourgeois shopkeepers with his billions, as he seems to regard himself as a modern-day warlord. A strong middle class, after all, could only get in the way of his aspirations to be the supreme leader of New York City.
This might be somewhat laughable in another, more stable and sane America. But it’s pretty serious now, at a time when the President and Justice Department have forged a coalition with enfant terrible sociopaths like Dorsey.
Given Dorsey’s biases and his presence in Ferguson in conjunction with anarchist agitators, I think someone ought to be taking a very close and careful look at who he’s supporting in the area. Those gas masks and printed signs don’t come for free, you know.
If it turns out that he’s been throwing money at people who are filling bottles with gasoline and handing them out to clueless protesters, the man ought to be held to account for it, just as you or I would if we were fomenting violent unrest during a period of social disorder. If I, for example, were to hand out incendiary devices to men protesting unfair family court law, I expect I’d spend most of the rest of my life in prison.
Fair’s fair, Jack. If you’re fighting a proxy war against the American yeomanry in Ferguson, we’ll figure it out, and you’ll pay for it one way or another. If your idea of anarchy is placing yourself above the law atop an enormous pile of money, you’re eventually going to end up buried in your ill-gotten gains, or naked without them.
