As I’m sure many of you have seen by now, the famous polling of positive vs negative view of the opposite sex. Younger women are being more and more radicalized by social media and scare mongering to be afraid of men.
This is generally also born out in the the fact that women have by far being going more liberal over time, and we know that party basically hates men.
For all of the sex war stuff, it has mainly been the women becoming more radicalized. I think it’s quite obvious with the LBGT stuff, but this lends more credence with actual data.
Interestingly, there has also been some analysis several years ago about men’s income vs women’s income and how that relates to how many children they have.
I found that for husbands, personal income was positively associated with their number of biological children, and for wives, personal income was negatively associated with their number of biological children, as previous research has shown. That is, husbands with higher income tended to have more children, while wives with higher income tended to have fewer children.
Additionally, the more a man’s wife earned, the fewer children he was likely to have, and the more a woman’s husband earned, the more children she was likely to have. This was true for the entire sample as well as for the subset of men and women aged 45-65, who likely have completed fertility but are unlikely to be retired. This was not because of childlessness among low-income men and high-income women, but also held true for all those with children. For almost all the analyses, these findings held true regardless of whether or not education was controlled, i.e., held constant.
These results indicate that men earning high incomes with a spouse who has a low income have the most biological children in the United States, while women with low incomes with a spouse who earns a high income have the most biological children. These differences are not large—as very few people in the U.S. have large numbers of children—but they exist, nonetheless. For women, there is likely reverse causation as women who have children tend to work less outside of the home, which would mean lower income. Women with children may also experience wage discrimination. There may be reverse causation for men also, as men with children may try to earn more or may experience positive wage discrimination.
Even so, these results suggest that for men in the U.S., fathering children is still related to being able to provide, as it has been historically. For women, husband’s income remains important for childbearing. My study was based on data collected in 2014 when fertility rates in the United States were very low and falling. In 2021, the U.S. population grew at the slowest rate since the founding of the nation, in part due to historically low fertility rates.7 The findings presented here suggest that the decline in the proportion of men employed full time8 and the decline in male earnings relative to female earnings9 likely have contributed to the decline in aggregate fertility rates. Given the positive relationship between education and earnings, lower rates of men attending college are likely to exacerbate these tendencies in the near future, with a continuing downward pull on fertility rates.
Generally, when men get income they tend to go right to thinking how can I have a family and kids. On the other hand, women get income and tend to skip all of that and just go for a house, car, vacations and comfort. Maybe some have a couple of kids here and there, but much less than a family where it is primarily the man making the money. This has also started to go mainstream with talking about it on more podcasts as well.
Overall,
- The more women become so-called independent the more they hate men, hate children (abortion, don’t have kids) and become more selfish. Of course, we haven’t also brought up the statistics on the decline of female happiness, increased usage of anti-depressants, and all of the other negative effects.
- The funny thing is, though, that even many Christian men and women will say it’s a good thing that women are more independent, and they definitely don’t want to roll any of it back.
To me this is enabling addictive negative behavior. Like feminism, womens’ independence is a failed experiment.
Titus 2:3 Likewise, teach the older women to be reverent in the way they live, not to be slanderers or addicted to much wine, but to teach what is good. 4 Then they can urge the younger women to love their husbands and children, 5 to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands, so that no one will malign the word of God.
Not that we didn’t know already, but the Bible dispenses the best and most accurate advice.
