Mass sociosexual exchanges done at a net loss spell the degradation of society.

Readership: Christian Men
Theme: Christian Red Pill; Current Intersexual Dynamics
Length: 1,100 words
Reading Time: 6 minutes

Intro

Before I get to the main topic of this post, I’ll summarize the archetypal dynamics and structures of intersexual relationships and the transactions thereof. Also, the paradigmatic imbalances (e.g. AF/BB, etc.) were covered in the previous post.

Taraban assumes his audience is familiar with these dynamics, structures, and transactions, and makes reference to them in his talks. He doesn’t spell this out because it is pretty well-known RP Lore and he’s gone over it in other talks. H0eMath has also summed up the dynamics very well.

But here it is — in text.

Relationship Dynamics and Structures

In the modern SMP, we see four kinds of relationship dynamics at play in which sociosexual transactions are rendered.

  1. Soft Harems in which top 10% SMV men are having constant Sex with multiple women, literally shagging them silly every single hour of the 21st century (and leaving them forever defiled, jaded, and “cats and wine” single).
  2. ‘Situationships’ in which Women freely and willingly trade Sex to HSV Men for fleeting Attention and temporary Tingle tantrums.
  3. ‘Attention Wh0ring’, in which Women are soaking up all the Attention (and $$$) they can possibly attract through any means.
  4. ‘Friend Zone’-ships and other online transactions (e.g., OASIS, OnlyF@ns, P0rn, etc.) in which the vast majority of men grant women unmitigated Attention / Validation without any real social or sexual recompense.

Note that the first and second relationships are codependent on each other, as are the third and fourth.  So we essentially have two relationship structures, shown as blue-pink boundaries in the image, and explained below.

img-1783677421-6a50c1edf34798.27958108.jpg
  1. Male Dominant, Sex-Based Relationships (upper blue-pink boundary) — The Top 10% SMV men hold the pinnacle power in the first and second types of relationship dynamics.  Although male dominance constitutes a preferred relationship structure, Women cannot avail of marriage, because they’re refusing Headship, too busy competing for Top Ch@ds with Sex (“selling out the store”), they’re intentionally postponing marriage in favor of chasing after their corporate careers, Feminist Life Scripts, and the rare privilege of freezing their eggs, etc. etc. ad nauseum.
  2. Female Dominant, Attention-Based Relationships (lower blue-pink boundary) — Women hold the vast amount of power in the third and fourth types of transaction dynamics.  Guys on the bottom are stuck working for The Plantation™, or else MGTOW.

This is essentially the same structural dichotomy that Christian Manosphere authors have written about many times before: Male Dominant vs Female Dominant.  No surprise.

One takeaway here is that Women are going back and forth between the two — Ch@d for Sex, Ernie Orbiter for Attention and $$$ (i.e. double-mindedness, James 1:8; 4:8).  That’s even worse than Men being Blue Pilled / gynocentric, according to St. James.

MGTOW essentially erases the lower pink-blue boundary, and forces women to have only one type of interaction with men, instead of two. It also leaves women to face the consequences of those interactions.

img-1783677423-6a50c1ef4e3245.23183711.jpg

Transactions: Eating the Seed Corn

Taraban pointed out the transactions that are occurring in the SMP (which TRP has known for years).

Summarized:

  1. The Top SMV Chads are eating out the store in a sexual smorgasboard.
  2. A plurality of mid-tier Women are freely offering up Sex to HSV Men.
  3. Women are soaking up all the Attention (and $$$) they can get, mostly from non-Ch@ds.
  4. The vast majority of Men of all stripes are forced to forego sex, but are still surrendering unlimited Attention / Validation (either real or virtual) to Women.

So here is the fourth major idea I’ve gathered from DeBoer’s and Taraban’s talks on sociosexual economics, which comes from a consumer’s viewpoint: that BOTH men and women are freely and willingly offering up what is most desired by the opposite sex, Attention and Sex, even though they’re NOT getting what is most rewarding to themselves, respectively (except the first on the list).

  1. Only the Top 10% SMV men are getting AWL the Raw Dawg Sex they crave — out the wazoo.
  2. Women are unreservedly giving up Sex to Top Men, but only in so called ‘Situationships’ in which they are members of a de facto soft harem.  They DON’T get the kind of Attention from these men that is most desired.
  3. Women get unlimited Attention from the Low SMV men they despise, but NOT from the High SMV men they most desire.
  4. Low SMV men — the vast majority of men — are freely lavishing beaucoup Attention (and $$$ too) on Women through various means and venues, even though they’re getting no Sex play at all.  This includes many married men.
img-1783677424-6a50c1f09e3fc6.35344158.jpg

So you see, only the most immoral Top 10% C0ck Charmers are walking away with everything they need from their sociosexual transactions.  Everyone else is left fornicating, lusting, pining, playing games, screwing around, and/or jerking off in worshipful adoration of their own fantasies.

In sum, both men and women are, in a phrase, “Selling Out Cheap”.

Selling the Farm to Rent a Dream

With all this in mind, here’s another way we could look at this equation from a consumer’s viewpoint:

Women Waste their Sex on Ch@ds — Women are searching for, and having sex with, the tallest, richest, most handsome, well-hung (highest SMV) Ch@dS (plural!) they can find, even though…

  • It defiles them for marriage.
  • Those men are way out of their league.
  • They have to share these men with many other women.
  • It is often short-term and does not lead to marriage or any kind of commitment.
  • They do not even intend to have children with these men (which is the main purpose of, and the only real value of hypergamy).

Why? Because they obsess over getting Attention, Commitment, $$$, etc. from the men, specifically the men they cannot get it from.

Instead, women should be using sex more discriminately as a reward to men, a la operant conditioning. That means, NOT having Sex with men who don’t offer Attention, commitment, etc. in return.

img-1783677426-6a50c1f21594c7.45102313.png

Men Waste their Attention on Sl0res — Men are searching for, and wanking off to, the most beautiful (highest SMV) OASIS / OnlyF@ns / P0rn Models / Pr0stitutes they can find and/or afford, even though…

  • It is a waste of time and money.
  • It is all a distracting, passifying fantasy.
  • There is no real relationship, and not even any real sex in most cases.

Why? Because they need their Sexual urges continually sated, and the sexier, the better.

Instead, men should be using Attention more discriminately as a reward to women, a la operant conditioning. That means, NOT giving any Attention, $$$, etc. to women who have no IOI-laden interest in offering Sex, marriage, etc. in return.

Foreboding

In a nutshell, both men and women are losing out because they’re NOT demanding a ‘fair’ exchange — no boundaries, no morals, no purpose, and no trust.

But as things stand now, WHO is being ‘Rewarded’? It’s the Ch@ds and Sl0res.

And whatever behavior you reward, you’ll get MORE of the SAME via Operant Conditioning.

“Grease my quiche NOW, and tomorrow be fried!”

That’s selling out cheap!

All this reminds me of Ezekiel 16, Ezekiel 23, Hosea 2, and Nahum 3.

We are living among an adulterous and idolatrous generation.

“Whatever!  Just STFU and get me off!  Right F_king NOW! Gawdammit!”

Related