Calling sloring strumpets what they are.

Readership: Men
Theme: Gunk
Author’s Note: This essay was contributed by DocLove.  Added commentary from Jack.
Length: 1,700 words
Reading Time: 9 minutes

Relationships Between the Sexes are Dwindling

First of all, I want to point out that the typical pr0st!tute these days is not the boozy, drug addled psychopath wandering the streets in a stained and tattered pink miniskirt as was stereotypical in years past.  Pr0st!tut!0n has been whitewashed in the form of “escort services”, and has taken a significant online presence in the form of the OASIS (e.g. OnlyF@ns), and more informally as “paid dating”, and sugaring.

The demand for these types of transactional relationships has risen significantly in recent years, largely due to the breakdown in intersexual relations as described in this article at Lovism. (TheDeti shared these links in a comment.  The second link is a discussion of the first on reddit.)

Everyone should read the first link.  Lovism is a site that promotes Equalitarianism, so I was surprised to see this article which is absolutely Dalrockian in the way it breaks down the numbers and offers an objective critical review.

img-1783679382-6a50c996d0c5c4.22452665.jpg

In the Lovism article, one claim in particular struck me as being off-kilter. The author, Henry Blair, says technological advancement (which includes Hookup apps such as OK Cupid, Tinder, or OnlyF@ns as some but not all examples) is NOT responsible for destroying heterosexual relationships. He argues that if this were the case, then h0m0sexual relationships for both men and women would be destroyed also.  He says even though heterosexuals are having less sex than 20 years ago, h0m0sexuals are having more sex than 20 years ago, and this is evidence that hookup apps are bringing people together as designed.  (My disagreement is to say this kind of technology enables more promiscuity, which in turn has longitudinal consequences that destroy not only heterosexual relationships but also families and the very fabric of society.) Instead, Blair says heterosexual relationships between men and women are being destroyed because of Feminism and m!s@ndry.  (I’ll agree on this, as would most readers here.)

Blair goes further to say man-h@t!ng Feminists and m!s@ndr!sts planned the disaster between the sexes — a conspiratorial view that I didn’t expect to see from an Equalitarian site.

He is quite correct to point out that the goal of our ruling elite (who are mostly man hating Feminists and m!s@ndr!sts) is to harm heterosexuals, especially male heterosexuals, and to promote h0m0sexuals, especially female h0m0sexuals.  Blair strongly implies that their goal is to make women the head of the household with all of the rights, privileges, and benefits with none of the obligations, duties, and responsibilities, while men get the exact opposite in heterosexual relationships of any and all kinds.

Sadly, even many anti-Feminist men are man hating / m!s@ndr!st, and so are many religious people of all faiths and even so called Conservatives or Traditionalists. All these groups hate men approximately the same as man hating Feminists and Leftists do. They’ve all fallen under the sway of TPTB and each group has played a part in tearing down heterosexual relations and marriage through various avenues.

That’s the current situation that we’re now facing.

img-1783679384-6a50c998a4e8e6.06351440.jpg

Prostitution should be Decriminalized

All that said, I think pr0st!tut!0n should be decriminalized, or at the very least legalized and lightly regulated and taxed which is second best.

Christians may wonder why I say pr0st!tut!0n should be decriminalized, even though the acts of doing, and thinking about fornication, and even more so adultery are mortal sins which one can suffer in Hell forever for doing.  Yet, it is less recognized that the sin of habitually masturbating and even the thoughts of lust are also mortal sins which can cause one to suffer in Hell forever.  These are carnally different sins, but are spiritually the same.

I do not want to burn in Hell forever, but if I consider the position of an unbeliever who is going to burn in Hell forever, then given the choice, I would prefer to do it for fornication and adultery than for masturbation and lust because I would suffer equally or nearly so for both pairs of sins.  (I know unbelievers are not likely to be concerned about this, but believers may consider this on their behalf.)  There is little moral difference between fornicating or committing adultery with pr0st!tutes and fornicating or committing adultery with anyone you might meet.  IMO, people are more likely to find the grace of God by fornicating with a lover than by visiting pr0st!tutes, but OTOH, the majority of men who see pr0st!tutes are men who are decided bachelors who have chosen that lifestyle, or men who have no chance with women anyway.  Only man hating Feminists and m!s@ndr!sts would say pr0st!tut!0n sex is worse than casual sex / fornication (because the former does nothing for the Feminine Imperative), and they are not likely to have any qualms about fornication and adultery as being sins per se.  What we see from them, rather, is that fornication is outrightly celebrated as a social convention and adultery is more or less acceptable for women but NOT for men.

Another reason I endorse legalizing pr0st!tut!0n is because it doesn’t directly affect Christians. Christian men and women can always choose to NOT participate. But allowing it provides an outlet that will mercifully ameliorate the sex drive of non-Christian men and grant them a moment of post-nut clarity about what they’re doing with their lives.

A third reason why I think pr0st!tut!0n should be legalized is because the defacto reason why pr0st!tut!0n is banned is to harm, humiliate, and control all men of all sexual orientations, but especially heterosexual men.  Pr0st!tut!0n, when freely practiced, frees all men from the vices of withholding women, and especially heterosexual men from this gynocentric constraint, which is falsely proffered as a moral and/or religious constraint.  It doesn’t harm women who freely choose to be pr0st!tutes, and even reduces harm to all women, as it provides an outlet for the unquenchable male thirst.  But the man hating Feminists and misandrists hate not being able to control, humiliate, and harm men, even if improving the better treatment of men would lead to better outcomes for women and reduce worse outcomes for women.

The fourth reason why I favor permitting pr0st!tut!0n is because I believe it would upset the black market sex trade and human trafficking. Maybe I’m wrong about this, but as of yet, I haven’t been convinced otherwise.

img-1783679385-6a50c999e505d7.78500364.jpg

Prostitution as a Political Counter-Force to Abortion

There’s another politically motivated reason why I think pr0st!tut!0n should be permitted.

NaturallyAspirated wrote,

“Additionally, this is why conservatives need to give up the issue [of abortion] politically. It’s ingrained in modern women that abortion needs to be legal and available. It’s a deep down subconscious feeling that modern women have, and they won’t vote against it. They are products of the sexual revolution, and having to bear the consequences of sexual acts is unacceptable.”

If we can’t eliminate abortion, then maybe conservatives should push for legalizing and even subsidizing pr0st!tut!0n instead. It would be a bipartisan solution too, as this would solve the Democrat’s “man problem” in a jiffy. Imagine how chipper men would be if they all had a trollop ticket for 10 freebies a month between the ages of 18 and 65! Any more in excess of 10 would be at their own expense. Let tramp tickets be legal tender, available at ATMs, transferrable, and with no expiration date. Unused tart tickets can be redeemed for a tax rebate. Let the harlots be government employees with their own calling card and have them be checked for cooties every day. Award meretricious strumpets bonus pay for servicing more than 10 Johnsons a day and for repeat customers. Hippos need not apply. Have running tiered competitions for the largest volume of ejaculate, the longest shot distance, and the most orgasms per hour, culminating in state and national Spunk championships. Charge spectators a fee for additional revenue. Give out chewing gum, mints, pennants, and snuff at the door. Make a reality TV series out of the most desperate and kinky nymphomaniacs. Anything for $$$ and taxes. After all, the need for sex is ingrained in modern men and it needs to be legal and readily available. It’s a deep down subconscious satisfaction that modern men have been deprived of, and they’ll never vote against it. The centrality of sex is a product of the sexual revolution, and men having to bear the consequences of a life without sex is unacceptable.

img-1783679387-6a50c99b3989e5.33635611.jpg

I’m hoping readers appreciate the satire, but it is a fascinating proposal. The bottom line is that pr0st!tut!0n would be more morally acceptable than bl00dy ab0rt!0n.

Caveats

One caveat here is that not all pr0st!tutes have freely chosen that lifestyle, but have been forced into it somehow.  This gets into a can of worms surrounding abduction / k!dn@pping, human tr@ff!ck!ng, sex tr@ff!ck!ng, etc. which are on the rise in recent years.  It is unknown whether decriminalizing pr0st!tut!0n would exacerbate these problems further or lessen them due to the greater ubiquity and availability of pr0st!tutes and the reduced market demand for them that would result.  Perhaps regulation and taxation would be beneficial but its overall effectiveness remains questionable.

Another issue is that decriminalizing pr0st!tut!0n sends the message that illicit sex is acceptable…  but gee…  we’re already there now, and have been for a few years.  We just don’t call it pr0st!tut!0n.  Instead, it’s labeled “bodily autonomy”, “choice”, “feminine power”, OnlyF@ns, “sexual freedom”, sugaring, etc.  Only the Manosphere has the gall to correctly label them as H03s.

Maybe it’s time we faced reality. There are no laws against OnlyF@ns, etc. Pr0st!tut!0n is already defacto legal.

Related