Removing constraints unleashes the fleshly nature.
Readership: Married Men; Marriage Minded Men; Mentors of young men;
Theme: Transactions
Author’s Note: The contents of this post are the proceeds of an email exchange between RPA and Jack on 2024/1/31-2/1. Jack organized and compiled the content.
Length: 1,300 words
Reading Time: 7 minutes
Has the Sexual Revolution Redefined A1phatude?
Under The Larger Conspiracy that Justifies Feminism (2023/11/6), Rock Kitaro posed an interesting question.
“Here’s a question I’d like to ask in earnest. Regarding this point from the conclusion,
“That female sexual liberation breaks down assortative mating and permits all women to bed the top males with few repercussions.”
Do you think that the Sexual Revolution also redefined what’s perceived to be the “top males”?”
“I say that because just this morning, I was watching a Kendra G interview with an older married black couple (both in their 60s), where the woman got with him when he was just making $3.85 an hour, and now he’s a millionaire. The couple placed a greater emphasis on values and how love is love, regardless of whether you’re poor, sick, or unable to produce.
I know there’s always been alphas and whatnot … but for some reason, I suspect the sexual revolution, the normalization of the hook-up culture, and the acceptance of sexual immorality has deteriorated what could have been the top male in the past. I’m thinking of the Gilded Age, where even when sexual immorality did happen, it was usually a scandal if it became public knowledge. Divorce was horrid. And virtues like respect and dignity were withheld.”
The short answer is no.
Women’s attraction to the Alpha Male is a timeless archetype. That’s why it’s the foundation for many evo-psyche models. It’s even Biblical.
- Samson and Delilah.
- Women loved the warrior poet David as he danced in his linen ephod.
- Solomon was the child of the hot exhibitionist Bathsheba and David who is described as ruddy and handsome in 1 Samuel. Solomon was almost certainly a very good-looking man to go along with his gift of wisdom and incredible wealth.
- Both David and Solomon pulled pu$$y about any time they wanted it because a top man in the female attraction matrix back then is just like a top man in the female attraction matrix now.
Human nature is amazingly reliable.
Let’s go over a few other things that have changed because of the Sexual Revolution, and you’ll see what I mean.
The Sexual Revolution Unleashed the Fleshly Nature
I’m reading a book called A Billion Wicked Thoughts, by Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam (2011). Researchers analyzed web searches because they show what people really look for when there is no risk of judgment. Their findings were scandalously out of line with the SMP at that time, but since then, the SMP has become more like what they found, indicating that there is less risk of judgment now compared to a decade ago.
Going further back in history explains why this is. The Sexual Revolution introduced a liberal ethic of “Free Love”, which effectively removed the social constraints on top men and the women who find them desirable.
It’s like Joe2 wrote.
“I believe constraints on all women were gone which, at least initially, resulted in greater participation. Not because women redefined what they perceived to be the “top males”, and not simply because they could participate.”
Yes. The reality is NOT that women could now participate. It is because they always wanted to participate and now no longer face the stigma for doing so. Over time, hypergamy did its thing and now we are living in a Pareto reality of 20% of men getting 80% of women’s sexual attention.
In that sense, the sexual revolution is like alcohol. Alcohol does not change people. It disables inhibiting brain circuitry so that what is really inside comes out. The sexual revolution made women’s base desires socially acceptable so now we get to see the unfiltered versions.
Human nature is amazingly reliable.
All Obstacles are Relocated or Removed
“Perhaps their participation was due to Fear Of Missing Out [FOMO] or herd mentality. And there was no shortage of willing men. It was rather easy for the average guy to get some pu$$y back then.”
Relatively easier, certainly. “Free love” was more free when it was novel and risqué, ironically. But what I think is a bigger driver of female promiscuity since the Sexual Revolution is that women really want sex — provided their attraction filters are satisfied — but once they are, watch out!
Women are very much interested in sex, but their source of arousal is different. As Rock mentioned, herd mentality has a bit to do with the matter, but I believe it is less FOMO and more the lack of judgment from the herd.
As Jack pointed out recently, female peer groups have replaced the role of Father / Husband, and thus, $1ut shaming is no longer based on the relative differences in women’s $1uttery. Now it’s about controlling the herd. The $1ut shaming we see today is from bitterly envious harridans who can no longer $1ut as easily as their cohorts who are “younger, hotter, tighter, and free”.
Hence why women focus on building consensus. When women want to take down other women they’ll resort to the classic $!ut shaming tactic. But when women get messages like FOMO, YOLO, and $1ut Faming instead of judgment and shame, then they’re off on a race to the bottom — literally.
Human nature is amazingly reliable.
Ab0rt!0n “Rights”
Ab0rt!0n is another product of the Sexual Revolution that has irreparably changed Western culture. I wrote about this before in Moral Hazard is Collateral Damage (2022/3/14).
After having access to legalized ab0rt!0n since 1973, it has become ingrained in modern women’s unconsciousness that ab0rt!0n needs to be legal and available, simply because women now take sexual license for granted, and having to bear the consequences of their sexual proclivities is unacceptable, and even religious women feel this way.
Now, everyone in our society wants to have consequence-free sex with whomever they want, however, whenever, and wherever they want, as NovaSeeker wrote. Even !ncels support such a proposition.
Conservatism’s attempts to regulate and/or ban ab0rt!0n is now a lost cause, as modern women, even nominal ‘Christian’ women, will never vote against it.
Human nature is amazingly reliable.
Epilogue
As you can see, the effect of the Sexual Revolution was to remove all the previous constraints on sexual morality, thereby permitting the fleshly nature to run wild. The various developments that upended those constraints are what Red Pillers now call The 15 Sirens of the Socio-Sexual Apocalypse. As these constraints fell one by one over the subsequent decades, all sorts of sexual immoralities have grown to become the norm. Interestingly, even the old forms of sexual immorality that were common in that bygone age have been displaced and superceded by new and improved avenues of lechery, as Rock described here.
“So-called “gentlemen’s clubs” feared going out of business because why would an average guy pay to see some half-naked woman dance when he could get some pu$$y without much effort? And many “gentlemen’s clubs” did go out of business despite the fact there was an ample supply of desirable women willing to entertain men.”
“The pendulum has now swung back making it difficult or near impossible for the average guy, and “gentlemen’s clubs” can’t get desirable women, so the average guy is left with P0rn, etc.”
Yes. Those of us living today have the bitter ‘privilege’ of witnessing firsthand the consequences of violating millenium old Biblical regulations on sexual morality. SMH.
Human nature is amazingly reliable.
Related
- The Power Moves: A Billion Wicked Thoughts: Summary & Review (2021/7/23) [Archive]
- Σ Frame (Red Pill Apostle): Incentives for Bimbofication (2021/8/23)
- Σ Frame (Red Pill Apostle): How Feminism Erodes Marriage (2021/11/8)
- Σ Frame (Red Pill Apostle): The Turnings Applied to the State of Marriage (2023/12/11)
