There’s no control, actually.

Readership: All
Theme: The W!tchy War on Masculinity
Readers’ Note: Part of a mini-series on the new “Pity Men” narrative.
Length: 500 words
Reading Time: 3 minutes + 15 minute video

Here’s yet another example of the overweening new “Pity Men” narrative.  This time, they’re questioning the basic ontology of identifying with men, thereby indicating that they’re aware of the plan.

Manosphere Highlights Daily: RE: Sydney Watson — The Men vs Women Problem | Are We Empathizing Too Much With Men? (2023/11/10) Length: 15:37

Note the title, “Are We Empathizing too Much with Men?”  A better question would be, “Are We Empathizing too Much with Women?” — women like Sydney Watson.

Even MHD fails to pick up on the bias.

Watson dominates the conversation, which is in accord with the cultural zeitgeist of gynocentrism. She smanders T@te’s name as a byword to recast the entire Manosphere as m!s0gyn!st!c. She denies all the basic Red Pill truths about the feminine feral nature as being ‘illogical’ and ‘unreasonable’. Of course it is illogical and unreasonable, nevertheless, it is true!

Why is Sydney Watson’s opinion deemed so important?  It is because she is moderately attractive, and therefore, her “opinion” gets her cash, clicks, and views.  If she cut her hair and packed on 50 kg. (~110 lbs.), her opinion would suddenly not be anywhere near so popular.  She would just be another whiny Karen that no one would want to listen to.

Look at the two guys Watson is talking to (not with).  I’d say they’re somewhere between Gamma and Delta on the SSH.  Why is she talking with these guys instead of someone like Aaron Renn, Chris Williamson, or Jordan Peterson?  It is because her rhetoric can’t stand up to a man any higher in the hierarchy.  I’d like to see what Watson says in the presence of an Alpha like Andrew T@te or a Sigma like Myr0n G@!nes.  She would get flustered and fold.  She might even get flushed and F.

At 11:15 to 11:35, they openly admit being “controlled opposition”.

img-1783681891-6a50d363615c54.81258544.jpg

The so called “controlled opposition” may not be covertly coordinated by TPTB as we may be wont to imagine.  Instead (at least in this case), the controlled opposition are wishy washy people who misinterpret Red Pill truths as m!s0gyny and mistake opinion for the Manosphere.  They fill the airwaves with static rhetorical pollution which clouds the real issues and distracts seekers from finding the real thing.

Ironically, the controlled opposition has no control whatsoever.  They’re just flapping their lips and creating catharsis.  Perhaps that is all that is necessary to qualify as “controlled opposition”.

P.S. — This post should not be misinterpreted as saying that there is NO ‘orchestrated’ controlled opposition. I saw that Chris Williamson did an interview with Rob Henderson and Prof. Jordan Peterson.  WTH?!?  How in the world did these guys ever link up?  It must have been ‘orchestrated’.

Related