Weaving threads of lies into a web.
Readership: All;
Theme: The W!tchy War on Masculinity
Length: 2,200 words
Reading Time: 12 minutes
Continuing from Where Shame Tactics become Witchcraft (2023/11/28)…
By divine coincidence, I came across an interweb persona who exemplifies W!tchd0m: s@r@hr0berts0n634. Below, I’ve copied some of her comments from under a YouTube video, The Happy Wife School: Why Men NEED Sex (2023/11/14). (The video itself is quite good and is worth watching.)
I’ve reorganized these comments by topic in order to elucidate her thinking. Note how she pieces together various bits of truth, true lies, and lies to weave together an alternate reality — one in which women are the supreme imperial lordettes of all human life and procreation.
The Big Lie: Female Primacy
This is the big one, obviously motivated by both The Curse of Eve and The Feminine Imperative. All remaining claims are staked on this assumption, which appoints women to be the judge and jury of men and all things sacred and holy (e.g. identity, sex, marriage, reproduction, etc.).
“It’s only natural if women are happy with the relationship. If we’re not happy with the relationship, it would be very unnatural to have sex. Pretty logical.”
“That’s a cute speech, but none of that matters. The law of supply and demand is still in effect. Women are the supply, and men are the demand. The demand is far greater than the supply.”
“All women know this. We control sex, marriage, and reproduction, because it happens inside our bodies. Duh. You didn’t realize that? If you think about it, it makes all kinds of sense. There are also supply and demand factors at play in the sexual dynamic. Since our supply is vastly smaller than your demand, we make the rules. That’s capitalism, baby.”
“Your supply and demand speech is cute. You obviously didn’t account for h0eflation.”
“There’s nothing incongruous about what I posted. Women aren’t out of control when we enforce the law of supply and demand. We’re living by a standard of self-discipline and expecting males to match it. Sadly, they mostly fall short.”
Women have authority over men in only one arena of life — sex. She is taking this to the hyperbolic extreme, and using it to claim authority over not just one man (i.e. her husband), but all men in all other areas of life. As a comparison, a modest and respectable woman would keep her authority in this area confined to the marital bedroom and defer to her husband in all other matters.
Routinely Taking ‘Offense’ from Perceived Transgressions to Feminine Moral Superiority
When Female Primacy is assumed, any semblances of Male Authority or Biblical / Traditional Values are perceived as a threat to the gynocentric order of power. Women lack the authentic authority needed to overturn male authority, so they react to this threat by getting ‘offended’ and by arrogantly and quite vainly airing their indignation about being the weaker vessel. The strategy is to exhaust the opponent until he becomes exasperated and quits, so here we often see the big guns come out with attacks on the man’s virility (e.g. ‘incel’, mocking abstinence / celibacy / sexlessness / virginity, withholding sex, etc.) and various large stake threats (e.g. ‘cancelling’, criminal charges, divorce, HR reports, lawsuits, and so on).
“What will happen is that he will be taken to divorce court. We are no longer messing around with males that can’t control themselves.”
“I’m super offended, and I’ve already spoken to the internet manager. It’s an AI chatbot that said incels will be incels. I can accept that.”
Mocking Men and Disparaging Headship Authority
Once Female Primacy is established (in her mind), men are relegated to a secondary and somewhat superfluous role in the order of things. Men who don’t readily fall in line with the inverted gynocratic order, or who are insufficiently reverent to their female overlords are mocked, ostracized, and shamed* as ‘immature’, irrelevant, or caveman remnants of the Dark Age.
“Aww, did the sl@ves leave the pl@nt@t!on? Ain’t that a shame. If males can only love us if we’re sl@ves, maybe that say more about males than it does about us?”
“Well, to a modern day feminist, raising kids is not a job and anyone can do it, so your 3 kids are nothing.”
“Oohh… I’m thinkin’ hard… But the difference is I don’t think I’m owed anything because I don’t have that masculine entitlement.”
“…younger women like to spend older men’s money on their younger boyfriends, whose sexual performance and attractiveness is superior to the old guy’s.”
“…a lot of males get friend zoned by their wives. It’s really funny that these clueless dudes just can’t seem to figure out why.”
“You really like to copy me. Can’t you come up with anything original?”
Notice that most of these statements are psychological projections. That is, she sees her own nature in the men she attacks (e.g. clueless, cruel, entitled, selfish, sl@ve driver, etc.).
* A more complete list of shaming tactics can be found here.
The True Lie: Sex is a Luxury, NOT a Need
Recall that the topic of the original video was about Why Men NEED Sex. Instead of entertaining the topic, she hijacks the discussion by dismissing the nature of male sexuality and reframes the context by redefining sex as a luxury. Note how her argument builds and develops.
“Let’s stop dramatizing and acting like sex is a NEED. This whole video is nonsense.”
“[Sex is] not a need, it’s a want.”
“I’m here to remind you that sex is a luxury.”
“Sex is a luxury. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs puts the actual essentials first.”
“It’s your lot in life to “do without”. Nobody owes you sex. Not in dating, not in marriage.”
It’s true that men won’t die if they don’t have sex. They’ll just die sooner than if they do. Whether sex is a need or a want or a luxury is a separate topic and is complex enough to deserve its own post or video. Here, it is merely a useful distraction.
Gaslighting: Men are Without Agency
In order to make her claim that sex is NOT a need compatible with her viewpoint, she deceptively reframes the context yet again by redefining the natural male sex drive as “a lack of self-control / self-discipline”, thereby proffering a ridiculous claim that men are without agency. (If men truly lacked self-control, they would b!tch slap her into next week [Case Study].) Note her condescending speech. Men are regarded as beggars for p_ssy, and she insinuates that men are desperate dogs and sex offenders who are unable to function normally.
“Your lack of self-control is the problem. And that’s a YOU problem all the way.”
“The reason is because your lack of control over your sex drive is not her problem. You don’t need sex, you need self-discipline.”
“It’s better for males to learn self-control, than to run away and try to shop for permission to be undisciplined elsewhere. Fortunately, women everywhere are beginning to lay down the law on this issue.”
“Males are going to have to improve their self-mastery, and women are collectively raising their standards to make sure that they do. Onward and upward, ladies.”
“Your sense of urgency shows a lack of self-control. The conversation that needs to happen is the one in which she addresses your need for self-discipline.”
“I don’t know what to tell you, sugar bean. We are in charge of sex, reproduction, and marriage. In order to be married, you have to learn self-control. If you don’t want to be a sex offender, you have to learn self-control. If you want to be able to function in your daily life, you have to learn self-control. You don’t have to like it. But even dogs can be trained to control themselves.”
“I’m not a desperate, slobbering animal that fixates on satisfying my carnal lusts. That’s male behavior. I care about self-discipline first. My husband has mastered that, so then we can both be lustful.”
“Oh, I better do what? Sex is a want, not a need. The need is self-discipline. Enforcing self-discipline is a lot of work, but since it’s for the good of the male partner, it’s worth it. Having control of yourself is the best possible outcome for your life. You should try it sometime.”
“The realization that males need to control themselves is dawning on a lot of women. More and more ladies are refusing sex, dating, marriage, and children. It’s a good thing.”
Again, the idea of men controlling themselves is a projection of the W!tch’s inner desire to contain and control men, and NOT a statement of reality. Sadly, many men fall under this spell by succumbing to these emasculating beliefs and thus become pawns of the W!tch’s schemes.
Cherishing a Cold Dead Heart
The final metaphysical edifice to fall is the recognition of self — one’s desires, emotions, identity, personality, values, and so on — what Christians might call the soul. The soul is methodically rooted out and eradicated in order to attain ego dominance and to have no authentic persona that can be attacked or hurt. All attachments and commitments are forsaken to this end, and this is falsely identified as ‘freedom’.
“Emotional intimacy is not a need. Emotional self-discipline is just as important and sexual self-discipline.”
“What, did you think I would say that emotional intimacy is a need but physical intimacy is not? A grown woman with emotional self-discipline may want an emotional connection, but she doesn’t need an emotional connection. What she needs is self-discipline. It’s absolutely no different. Grown women aren’t children, we can do just fine with no emotional connection to our partner. You do realize that women feel the most emotionally isolated when they’re married, right?”
Only because they see marriage as a prison that excludes them from the free wheeling lusts of the carousel.
“The difference is, emotions don’t harm males, but sex harms women. So there is a gap there. But still. No woman worth a d@mn would ever demand emotional intimacy from an unwilling partner. Does that answer your question?”
“Actually, women being celibate is quite powerful. Haven’t you noticed how the loudly the males are whining about a “loneliness epidemic” these days?”
“More and more women are embracing celibacy worldwide. It’s happening.”
“I can live in the woods for years with no gear. Can you?”
Clearly, the idea of women remaining celibate is a blatant lie intended to reduce male expectations and normalize dead bedrooms and marital fraud.
Denial: Wives are Absolved from Marital Duties
This brings us around to the fundamental purpose of all these lies — buffering Women’s Existential Fear by disregarding authentic relationships, marriage, marital duties, traditional gender roles, procreation, and child rearing.
“There’s no vow that states how much sex will happen.”
“There’s no set amount of sex specified in any wedding vow. It’s not our job as women to “put out”. Males are never entitled to sex, ever. Not in dating, not in marriage, not in any context. The sooner you learn to control yourself the happier you’ll be.”
“Better call the men’s domestic v!0lence hotline and cry that a legal divorce is abuse.”
Left unsaid is how they compare all men, including the man called ‘husband’, to the string of chads for whom they have prostrated themselves in the past.
Self-Justification
We might wonder how a woman could torture herself with all these self-destructive denials, fears, and lies, and still go on living. Here, the hamster must go into overdrive to absolve her solipsistic conscience from the guilt and shame of her sin. So we see her churning out denial for-ever-more and inventing reasons why all the above can be justified as permissible or even good.
“I worship the Flying Spaghetti Monster.”
“I show these comments to my children, my siblings, my parents, my nieces and nephews, aunties and uncles, grandparents, cousins. You are showing my family (and the world) why women are no longer interested in marriage.”
“Divorce rarely improves women’s lives financially. Look at the statistics on it.”
“Since I’m already married, the “wall” that you incels speak of doesn’t exist for me by your standards. Now, people with normal functioning brains understand that age affects everyone, and that males really don’t get more attractive with time. Likewise, the older single ladies I know are all single by choice, and feel better and less isolated, stressed, and ill than when they were married. If I hadn’t scored a unicorn, I’d be right there with them. Males don’t add much to women’s lives, typically.”
How many times have we heard women say that their husband is ‘boring’, ‘cold’, ‘unresponsive’, ’emotionally unavailable’, etc.?
Translation: “He won’t participate in my drama. I can’t manipulate him with erratic emoting. He won’t succumb to my spells!”
Myron Gaines explains how W!tchy solipsistic self-justification works here (Warning: Explicit language).
Concluding Statements
This case study helps us recognize the general patterns of how W!tches build a false psychological paradigm that supports their spellbinding.
- Assume an alternate / false hierarchy of authority, in this case, Female Primacy.
- Taking ‘offense’, followed by complaints, demands, threats, and attacks.
- Mocking Men and Disparaging Headship Authority.
- Mixing truth with lies.
- Gaslighting.
- Relishing a Cold Dead Heart.
- Denial of Agency / Responsibility.
- Self-Justification.
Note the general tactics:
- Threats
- Gaslighting
- Mocking men
- Shaming men
- Defaming men
- Degrading men
- Defrauding men
- Dishonoring men
- Disregarding men
- Arrogantly belittling men
- Assuming moral / sexual / social superiority
- Implementing and defending false boundaries
- Assuming a false / incongruous (non-contextual) frame
- ‘Predicting’ men’s behavior with a foreboding, ominous fear
- Expecting or demanding male obeisance / subservience / supplication
She says she is married. Now there’s a man who truly deserves Emba’s and Reeves’ new “Pity Men” narrative. No self-respecting man would tolerate all this BS. Her husband must be the weakest schlub of a supplicating Male Feminist who ever crawled the earth.
Sorry dude.
Related
- Dalrock: The curse of female power (2010/9/12)
- Σ Frame: The Spirit of Jezebel (2023/11/15)
- Σ Frame: The Spirit of Athaliah (2023/11/16)
- Σ Frame: More on the Spirits of Jezebel and Athaliah (2023/11/17)
- Σ Frame: Testimony from a Reader Battling Witchcraft (2023/11/20)
More Case Studies
- Σ Frame: Eunuchs of the New Feminist Order (2019/8/31)
- Σ Frame: Irresponsible Ejaculation Causes Abortion (2019/9/23)
- Σ Frame: Yet another variety of Internet Whoring (2019/10/9)
- Σ Frame: Only noble born men are qualified to do housework for unicorns (2020/8/24)
- Σ Frame: Redefining Manhood as Boyish Immaturity (2021/6/14)
- Σ Frame: Carousel Widow in Decline – Part 1 – Part 2 – Part 3 – Part 4 – Part 5 (2021/8/6-28)
- Σ Frame: Sappy Wall Day, Tomi Lahren! (2021/8/11)
- Σ Frame: A Snapshot of the Destruction caused by Pride (2021/8/25)
