Young Men, Forsake the Love of Dionysus.  Embrace the Love of Headship!

Readership: All
Theme: Wives and Mothers
Reader’s Note: This may be one of my most important posts this year.
Length: 800 words
Reading Time: 10 minutes

Introduction

A man chooses to marry a woman whom he loves, and it is seldom (if ever) the case that a man will marry a woman he does not love in some form or fashion.  However, it is this very form and fashion of love, yea, his mental state in this decision regarding the nature of love itself, which is what will determine whether he is destined for a God glorifying life of Headship, or the soul crushing legacy of being the ignominious punching bag of a ball busting battle axe.

We know that men love idealistically, and this remains true in either case.  However, a man’s paradigm of consciousness determines what love is in itself, and therefore whom is to be chosen as a wife.  Here, let us compare these two paradigms of love.

img-1783679178-6a50c8ca22f854.99247148.jpg

The Love of Dionysius

Within blank slate equalism (AKA Blue Pill mentality), a man would deem himself to be in love with a woman who humbles his desire and therefore holds sexual authority over himself.  This is an entirely natural relationship, and to some extent, ordained by God.  (Song of Solomon 4:1-15; 6:4-12; 7:1-9)*

When he says, “I love her!”, he is confessing his quivering heart’s submission to The One™ who has captured his lustful imaginings in the hope that he will forever be her personal Dionysus, and her his personal Aphrodite, and to pour his pagan lust upon her with every stirring urge.

img-1783681936-6a50d390dcc8c7.83383409.jpg

The problem with this approach is that the woman holds the majority of power in the relationship.  So when the warm fuzzies fade away, and the humdrum rigamarole of daily living kicks in, he is relegated into the subservient mode of pedestalizing her and working like a son of a b!tch to recapture that original spark through various vain attempts at making her “happy” once again.  Unbeknownst to him, these efforts to satiate her non-burning bush will only further destroy whatever Tingles she may have ever had for him (if any at all) and ye olde dreaded dead bedroom syndrome sets in, never to be rescinded.

Within this type of “love” arrangement, it appears superfluous for St. Paul to have to tell husbands to love their wives (Ephesians 5:25-33; Colossians 3:19).  It would seem more appropriate for him to be telling wives to love their husbands with tender affections and a gentle rocking motion.  However, Paul’s admonishments make more sense when we recognize that this is not a Christian marriage to begin with.

The Love of Master Ch@d Head

Within a Headship structure of Authority, a man would deem himself to be in love with a woman who attaches her soul to his like a monkey on his back.  Although this is annoying and perhaps even embarrassing at times, she is submissive to his will and eager to please him in all things.  This is the more important piece of the equation which must be firmly set in place before Master Ch@d can quench his thirst without fear of being poisoned.  (Song of Solomon 1:2-4; 1:12-14; 1:16-17; 2:3-6; 2:16-17; 3:1-4; 5:4-5; 5:10-16; 6:2-3; 7:10-13; 8:1-3; 8:14)*

When he says, “She loves me!”, he is declaring his commitment to stick with her, teach her, mold her into wife material, and wash her clean, doing what is necessary to admonish her soul in the fear of the Lord.  Although he may not be raving mad with Dionystic desire, anytime she licks his ball sack with wide-teary-eyed eagerness of affection, he cannot resist ruling over her passions by shagging her eager thatch on the regular.  Atten-SHUN!  Thus, he is the master of her heart, and she the mistress who purveys the child-bearing receptacle for his loin slush.

img-1783681212-6a50d0bc8b4bb2.01310396.jpg

Within this type of love arrangement, it is altogether fitting for St. Paul to tell husbands to love their wives (Ephesians 5:25-33; Colossians 3:19), as this added effect is what will keep her enthralled with pangs of humble hungry desire and perpetuate her pasty passions of impalement into the eternal.

Conclusions

As you can see from the illustrations above, a man becomes trapped in a soul-sucking marriage when he puts his own thirst first and foremost, and bows down to worship p00n in the abstract.  Meanwhile, he fails to take advantage of other opportunities in which a woman may be offering her sincere submissive love to him.

OTOH, a man enters into a daily c0ck-sucking marriage and attains the glories of Headship when he settles in with a woman with whom he can make a game of keeping her dancing on her toes and begging for moar.  He stays focused on steadily nurturing his obedient house pet until she is capable of taking the honored place as his sidekick.

* Important Note: In the Song of Solomon, the majority of verses are of the bride singing praises to the groom, and not the other way around.  This is as it should be.

Related