Women desperately and instinctively avoid all things agentic in nature.

Targeted Readership: Men
Theme: Female Agency and Accountability
Author’s Note:  Some observations from Thedeti have been integrated into this essay.
Length: 700 words
Reading Time: 3.5 minutes + 11:30 minutes of video.

Case Study – JustPearlyThings

Whenever we’re discussing intersexual dynamics with women, there seems to be no end to the number of denials, excuses, justifications, objections, obfuscations, projections, and red herrings that pop out whenever the topic of Female Agency comes up.  It’s 100% predictable!

For example, take a look at this video that Jack shared under deti’s last post on Female Accountability (022/11/25).

JustPearlyThings: Modern Women HATE being ACCOUNTABLE for Actions (2022/11/28) Length: 11:36

Of special interest is the “Christian” girl in the black turtleneck (sitting on the right). During the earlier part of the video, she carries a smug look that betrays a red flag of pride, and she expresses faux annoyance every single d@mn time women’s responsibility or contribution to a relationship is brought up!

The outspoken girl in the red sweater (seated center) is the typical hypoagentic chick who feigns total ignorance of all things agentic.  When she is presented with inescapable facts (at 2:30), she keeps evading the question by nit-picking about the wording (“h0e” at 3:00), elaborating on her feeelings, and then (at 3:28) hijacking the conversation by bringing up the “double standard”.  By doing so, she successfully avoids the issue as then Pearl has to explain evo-psyche mating dynamics to her for the next 3 minutes.

Finally (at 6:50), the British dude in the black cap (i.e. a man) attempts to steer the discussion back to a topic related to women’s agency. (BTW, this is a skill all men need to learn — how to keep a woman on topic and not be distracted by her 3 ring circus show.)

But as soon as he’s finished talking, the “Christian” girl has reached the limits of her comfort zone and is barfing in her throat.  She clumsily fumbles for words in an effort to evade the topic of agency and accountability by bringing up how “purity culture” messed with her mind — a subtle attempt to shift responsibility.  She gives a spiel at 7:30 in which she presents her emotions and her indignation at the existence of less attractive men as “deep thought” and “serious commentary”. This isn’t “thinking things through”. This is little more than her “bad feelings” that men want sex, and if they don’t get it from her, they’ll move on and try to get it elsewhere or do without.

At 8:45, “Christian” girl makes the point that Christianity as depicted in the OT creates a mindset of what she calls “hypersexuality”, and she is clearly uncomfortable with the idea of women constantly having to anticipate the “hypersexuality” of men.  (BTW, it’s called testosterone. Unfortunately, no one brings up how men must constantly anticipate the hypergamy, hypoagency, and other machinations of women.)  When Pearl sets her straight (at 9:00), she gets flustered and evades the truth by trying to “clarify” herself (at 9:25).  It is obvious that she can see the writing on the proverbial Wall (unlike the other two seated), but she’s evading, fighting, squirming, and justifying herself through the whole ordeal.

Just like a 5-year-old girl caught stealing sweets!

img-1783683327-6a50d8ff5e5706.49519091.jpg

You can see this when Pearl brings up some uncomfortable truth (at 10:05): “You’ll eventually lose your looks”.  “Christian” Girl is so overwhelmed by this factoid that she can’t even put her thoughts together, and after a moment she deflects by responding, “…that’s not my point…” (at 10:20), and then she starts rambling something about virginity.

But, sweetie, that IS the point – that’s the entire point of this exercise!

And this is just one 11-½ minute interaction!  Readers could randomly choose any conversation or video on TikTok or YouTube in which men and women are discussing intersexual dynamics and/or Red Pill topics, and you’ll see the same kinds of reactions from women. Pearl’s audience is rather polite, compared to some other craziness we’ve seen.

Hypoagentic Triggers

From this one video, we can learn there are certain ideas / topics that trigger women’s hypoagentic defenses, characterized by a regurgitated flood of denials, excuses, justifications, objections, obfuscations, projections, and red herrings. Namely…

  1. That both men and women are sexual beings.
  2. That behaviors and choices carry consequences.
  3. That women prefer top 10% SMV men, and that all other men are invisible to them.
  4. That men prefer easy going hoes for fun, loyal virgins for marriage, and beautiful young women in general.
  5. That men want things from their relationships, just as women do.
  6. That if they want something from men, then they need to offer something that those men want from them.

I’ll guess that if this list were extended, it would include all things Biblical or Red Pill, or…  ahem…  anything uncomfortably truthful!

Related