I saw a comment on another blog about whether (Roissyite) game does better than a placebo. This is a very good question. Comparisons to placebo are done because taking a placebo is doing something. It creates an apples to apples comparison to see if whatever you’re testing actually works or if the results you are getting just come from the act of doing something regardless of that thing is.
What happens when you compare (Roissyite) game to taking a placebo? It’s worse, a lot worse. We all know how (Roissyite) gamers fail to get laid. Their rates of success are so low that is would be well below taking a placebo. That means that they would get laid more by taking placebos than game. Anything other than game is more likely to get you laid than game.
This is also why (Roissyite) gamers refuse to experimentally test game and reject science in general. An actual scientific experiment testing (Roissyite) game would show that it doesn’t work and is worse than taking a placebo.
This isn’t limited to (Roissyite) game either. All dating advice would should the same result of being worse than taking a placebo if tested in a scientific experiment. This should not shock anyone since all dating advice is a vehicle for misandry and not actually improving your results in dating and relationships.
