The meddlesome government in the UK recently passed a law banning insurance companies from giving women cheaper car insurance. Although the stereotype of the dithery woman driver at an intersection is beyond doubt, it’s the young tear-away males who have more car accidents. I can attest to this, having rolled a car the day I passed my driving license. Luckily I was on a long farm driveway, so the police never got involved.
It would seem fair enough for insurance companies to reward women, who drive safely and statistically have fewer bad accidents, whilst being wary of men under 30, who statistically have more accidents. Insurance companies are using nothing more than basic market forces. Socialist governments are very fond of banning that kind of thing, so what we have is the drive for equality starting to catch up with the females. You cannot ultimately have your cake and eat it. Suddenly car insurance premiums for women leapt 30-50% overnight.
The insurance companies fought back against the legislation and now simply reward safe drivers and those who take advanced courses and have a clean record. The person’s sex is no longer a consideration—not that it’s an invalid one really, but big brother has spoken.
Are we all drone worker bees?
Corporations like Google frown upon staff dating each other, which is understandable as it’s counterproductive to the dry corporate attitudes needed to get work done, but it is also inhuman. Founder Sergio can confirm this, as he left his wife for the chick that markets Google Glass. (She’s 13 years younger and pretty cute for a corporate type—the two-way google glass sex tape could be an industry first). If the bosses can’t stick to the rules, then what chance do the rest of the hive have?
The drive for so called equality is an absurd one and if taken to its logical conclusion will result in many privileges women enjoy being curtailed. The last time anyone got the door for a lady was probably pre 1970s, yet half the female work force only go into the office to find a husband. If they can’t date co-workers, what are they there for? Thus we see the flip side of equality starting to crimp the women’s standing in society. Equality emasculates men and defeminizes women. Let’s now think into what real equality would look like.
No more make up
There’s no particular reason why females should come into work all daubed up in a half inch of war paint. It’s tribal, insecure, unnecessary, and representative of a double standard.
No more silly shoes
Why should women get to wear high heels and platform shoes? A man wearing such garb would be considered odd, unless he had some physical impediment. Brightly colored, overly casual, sexy, flirtatious footwear is unnecessary at best and often times completely impractical.
No more long hair
A few outlier males in the tech department may be tolerated with a ponytail, but as a rule men are expected to keep their hair ‘short back and sides’, especially if they plan to represent the company to the public or climb the ranks. Why should women be treated any differently. I wonder if the females in military combat roles will be permitted to sport the latest beehive doo under their blast helmets?
“In coming RPG – hang on, let me just tie my bangs out of the way”.
No hair dye
Most men are happy to age with grace—there is no need for anyone apart from actresses to slather their hair with carcinogenic chemicals just to impress others.
No more silly clothes
A court room or board room is one of the most formal settings and yet women seem able to wander into work, adorned in brightly colored, figure hugging clothes, loose fitting open neck shirts and all manner of relatively informal garb. A basic suit and tie will be fine from now on. Wendy Davis pictured below is a Senator for Texas. Imagine if a male rocked into the Senate looking like that.
No more jewelry
A man who wears more than a basic wedding or signet ring, is already moving into the realm of gangster or rockstar. Why would women be permitted into work places dolled up like they are attending the shaman’s war dance? Nevermind bead necklaces, earrings have to go as well. I didn’t know Nancy Pelosi was running for Senate comedian.
No maternity leave or babies
All in the name of equality of course. Why should a company consider a woman any differently than they consider a man? Squeeze it out and get back to work.
No allowances for female-specific health issues
No headaches or period pains. PMS is not an excuse. Women are often seen getting the benefit of the doubt in areas concerning kids, family and their personal health. Now that we are all equal this must obviously stop.
No female issues and no women’s rights
Since we’re all equal now, a woman can never be given the benefit of the doubt or held in higher regard than any man. Even the most hardened feminist, bleating for equality ultimately shoots the entire movement in the foot.
No frilly underwear—sports bras only
Sexy garb is not only impractical and distracting it can be taken as a sexual attention grab. There’s no reason for women to use anything other than totally practical under garments. Plain Jane for everyone.
What’s more is that perhaps it’s the women that have been conned more than the men forced to tolerate it all. We can continue the list to the point of absurdity to see how real equality would look like:
- No special female politicians (minister for women etc.).
- No female categories in sports. You compete according to your skill set not your genitalia.
- No unilateral divorce.
- No women’s only gyms, schools, prisons, clubs, etc.
- No ladies night, or easy entrance to bars and clubs. We’re all just punters now.
- No using female head games, emoting or sexual leverage.
- No gender-specific bathrooms or changing rooms.
- No quotas for female staff. People are hired according to raw talent.
- No allowance for females being physically weaker.
- No special quotas for schools and universities. The best students move ahead on their performance.
Finally of course we should consider roles in which men take a far greater risk and endure harsh working conditions. All in the name of equality, men should demand equal numbers of females in dangerous and arduous industries such as mining, oil, container shipping, construction, and deep sea fishing while greater numbers of men relax in part-time jobs at salons, spas, daycare centers and in charity work. Pre-schools are almost all female staffed, because what mother would want to leave her 3 year old daughter with a strapping, muscly, bearded man? She can think that way, but it’s not equal opportunity employment, is it?
No one would want to live in this ridiculous world
Not even the most butch feminist would agree with this list, even though in truth it represents the most correct version of equality. The only other option is for men to start rebelling and dressing up for work like Keith Richards or David Bowie.
Masquara, eyeliner, bandanas, headbands, loose open neck shirts, crazy platform and high heeled shoes, wild haircuts, dyed and permed hair, loads of jewelry and flamboyant garb. We can roll up to work looking like a cross between Ali G, Mystery on the hunt for a threesome and an extra from Hunger Games.
Just Another Day In The Office
Both worlds are cartoon and ridiculous
By exaggerating and extrapolating the current trends we get a clear picture of how society needs “a cold hard slap in the face with a wet fish”. Ultimate equality will see women losing far more than men, while the current state of affairs is a botched job of double standards, gas-lighting and a few ugly women who’d rather be men spoiling it for the majority of feminine women. What it also does is spoil femininity for the real males who can handle the pressure of being a man and enjoy having a real woman in their life.
Equality is a drive towards the lowest common denominator. It’s not the averaging to the median that politicians use to sell the concept with. The farce of communism tried to create an equal market place for everyone, a society that is absolutely fair and unbiased. A few hundred million murders, and seventy years later, what they ended up with was no market place at all; having fallen to the lowest common denominator, where no one had any incentive to be anything other than the most average sociopathic version of themselves. It stands to reason that if you inhibit the high fliers of society and cut off that side of the curve, you do not land at the average of what you originally had. Rather you reduce the overall average to a much lower level.
It only needs one genius to write an amazing symphony or produce a new piece of technology that makes life better and more beautiful for everyone. As Tyler mentions in Fight Club:
“We’ve all been raised on television to believe that one day we’d all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won’t. And we’re slowly learning that fact. And we’re very, very pissed off.”
But we don’t need to be pissed off. We can just adore and appreciate the men who break the envelope and enjoy the world around us for what it is. We can adore and enjoy the beautiful feminine women.
Equality or jealousy?
A free system gives opportunities for great men (and women) to make the world a better place for those on the lower side of the average curve. That has to be better than dragging everyone over to the low side and imposing unnatural rules which end up ruining it for everyone.
Read Next: The Equality Movement Is Allowing Women To Tyrannize Men
