Always remember to plug your friends

Astute readers will note that I’m always adding new links to my blogroll, based on what I find interesting and on other bloggers who link to me. I don’t usually announce new additions to the roll unless they have something particularly interesting or unique to add. But when it snows, it blizzards, and I’ve got a bunch of fresh meat bloggers with interesting things to say.

First up, the comely, winsome, Canadian Roissy commenter Aoefe, who knows what she wants in a man:

This really leaves only one category of men for me.

Alpha widowers.

So if you’re an Alpha Widower who is significantly older than you think I am and you are interested in a somewhat kooky, always entertaining, hyper-sexual, monogamous, attractive enough submissive woman then please contact me.

I’m critical of older women because so many of them are unattractive, narcissistic, pathological liars, with all the class of a retarded frat boy making fart sounds with his armpits, but there ARE good thirty- and fortysomethings out there, and you’ve just found one of ‘em.

Aoefe is also fond of my blog (referring to me as a “prolific writer”), though she seemed to miss something about the videos I posted last week (she’s far too feminine to employ sarcasm effectively):

Please share the following video with your friends. This is important and life changing. Thanks to Ferdinand Bardamu who is doing the right thing by posting these and others like it on his site – thank you.

Sofia missed the joke too. For clarification, those clips come from Harry Enfield’s Television Programme, a British sketch comedy show that aired on the BBC in the early 90’s. You’d figure that Commonwealth citizens would be semi-adept at ID’ing Limey humor. That said, the “Women, Keep Your Virtue” vid is actually very good advice.

Next up is another Roissysphere denizen, the pseudoliterate professor of punchiness, Gunslingergregi, who has some sage advice on how you should treat your fellow man:

Look out for one another. What more can ya do. Spread some hugs. Spread some love.

Truly, he is the wisest philosopher of our time.

Another Roissy commenter, Default User, linked to yours truly in his “Non-Manifesto”:

The revolution can begin. It is a revolution of one. It begins with you and it ends with you. It begins when you stop giving a shit about what society thinks or about what women think. Find your mission and purpose. Write your own revolutionary manifesto.

Now there’s some inspirational words.

A bloke calling himself Unfrozen Caveman has written a great post in defense of pickup artists:

The first problem with the community is that it exists outside the paradigm of equality of the sexes. The claims of feminism are rejected, even laughed at. It doesn’t say that men are better than women, but it does say, very loudly, that we are different, a lot different. This is important because it’s something that modern males don’t really seem to understand. Sure, they may have noticed that girls cry more and like the color pink more than them, but many of the most important differences are not nearly as apparent. Often, a guy with unsatisfactory success with women will blame his looks, foolishly thinking that looks are as important to women as they are to men. Without evidence to the contrary, a guy automatically assumes that the female mind works like his own. Young men are not learning this from their parents or teachers, nor do most of them learn it on their own, so the community serves a noble purpose. We are different and for acknowledging that, the community is branded as sexist.

This guy is cool in my book.

I discovered the MGTOW blog when it showed up in my referrers list after the proprietor added me to his blogroll. There’s a good post on why studs are respected and sluts are vilified:

Conversely, a woman must prove herself to a man, for him to commit to a relationship with her and if she has had many sexual partners, he will likely not respect her as she has given sex away so freely. He will have sex with her like the many other men, but will rather commit to a woman who values her sexuality.

Monad for the win!

Finally, I saw An Exercise in Futility linked over at Ilkka Kokkarinen’s place. Emach’s got an awesome piece in which he reminds us how badly the baby boomers fucked the world up:

So now you’ve got a society inherited by our grandparents.  You get unions, and somehow we get John F. Kennedy.  Their kids, who were raised to be little soldiers, come to the bright conclusion of, “fuck this shit” and alternatively, “hell no, we won’t go.”  They see how their parents did it — far too “right” — too militaristic, disciplinarian, orderly, fascist — that they have to swing too far left to compensate.  Now you get the 60’s and hippies.

Here’s where everything goes horribly wrong.  And it goes horribly wrong because our parents, in their infinite 20 year-old wisdom, come to the conclusion that drugs are good, sex is good, and doing anything the way it was done before is bad.  The result is the Age of Aquarius and what has become modern liberal thinking.

There’s another good writeup in which emach deconstructs the most ridiculous false rape case I’ve ever heard:

Let’s get this straight:

1. You are sleeping in a house occupied by more than one man.
2. You are awoken in the middle of the night by a stiff cock.
3. You let said stiff cock enter you without taking the time to check to whom it’s attached.  You put up no physical or verbal resistance and by any 3rd party measure, you consented to the dicking.
4. You moan a lot and evidently enjoy it.
5. You realize you’re a dumbass and just got fucked by the wrong man.
6. You dial 9-1-1 and claim rape, fully prepared to testify in court that he raped you because even though you let him screw you, you thought he was someone else.  Therefore, this man is guilty and should be put in prison for at least 5 years.

This dude rocks.

In regards to other bloggers who I’ve been reading for a while, MarkyMark has a touching story about a relationship with a woman he had when he was in his twenties:

I can tell you what true love is not: it is NOT Sex and the City! This thing about having to feel butterflies, chemistry, etc. is crap! I call it the SATC mentality, and it is destroying relationships between men & women. While those feelings exist and are undeniable in their power, they are not true love, fellas. What you see in the movies is not true love, unless you look at “It’s a Wonderful Life”; that movie somewhat does justice to showing what true love is. What you see on TV shows is not true love. What you read in most modern books is not true love. What you see everyone doing is not true love. That is lust, pure & simple. You know, if I feel butterflies, chemistry, etc. to someone, I run the other way! When you’ve had Filet Mignon, why would you settle for rotten chuck steak?

Fantastic stuff.

The Elusive Wapiti offers up his views on “girl game”:

The interesting thing to consider is just how omnipresent female “game” is, to the extent that most people don’t even notice it anymore, including most women. It’s all part of the scenery, normal day-to-day behavior. Girls not calling up boys because it is unladylike? Game. A woman walks by in the store with her girls bouncing to and fro and threatening to bounce out? She’s running game on you, dude. How about the waitress who dolls herself up and dresses sexy? Well, she’s running “game” on you too, to get higher tips. Your date shows up late? Game. Doesn’t offer to pay her way? Game. Your woman strolls around in see-through lingerie and asks you to take her to bed or lose her forever? Game (although it is game/DT you are not likely to complain about and is one of the only Scripturally proper applications of visual game that women may employ).

Women manipulate men all the time, so you shouldn’t feel guilty doing the same with game.

Φ offers the most concise view of Mad Men that I’ve read:

The future that Don sees – the future in which so much of our society is in fact having to navigate – is not one that will last. And it won’t matter that the Wilkinsons and Michas of the world are happy that it is “equal” or “decent” or whatever. They may think that they’ve outsmarted their ancestors. They may believe that the wisdom of the past can be discarded in a generation, that they have truly ushered in the brave new world of free love and unlimited pleasure. But they are wrong. God will not be mocked, and history is littered with the remains of every civilization that has tried.

For my views on the show, see this post.

Dennis Mangan opines on the beauty of Baltic women:

So here’s an explanation for the abundance of beautiful women in the Baltics: a low sex ratio means that women face stiff competition for the available men, and therefore attempt to appear more physically attractive, i.e. they put more effort into looking the way a man wants a woman to look. When I was in Ukraine, I was stunned by the number of incredibly beautiful women, and while they may very well have a genetic advantage in beauty, that the women took great pains with their appearance was obvious. Most women wouldn’t consider leaving the house unless wearing a dress or skirt and heels. (This was in the early 90s, so things may have changed in that regard, though Ukrainian women still have quite the reputation for beauty.)

Somebody remind me to visit Latvia one of these days.

Ilkka has a post up on a related subject – the beauty of Russian women:

A fellow Finn once wrote that if you took the hottest girl in Helsinki and transplanted her to St. Petersburg, she would be just one face in the crowd, but if you took some random shopgirl from St. Petersburg and transplanted her to Helsinki, she’d be the hottest thing in town.

This classic article from the eXile will tell you everything you need to know about why Russkies are so hot.

Keoni Galt/Dave in Hawaii has a good post on what he terms “men’s rights awareness”:

To continue….I believe with the advent of the “Roissysphere,” I think we are now witnessing a new phase in MRA…a merging of the two spheres – “game” theory and MRA into a cohesive and complete understanding of how unnatural our current socially engineered gender roles has played into the social decay and decline of civilization we are all currently living through.

Also see Alkibiades’ and Welmer’s posts on the same subject.

Speaking of Alkibiades, his co-blogger Talleyrand has a must-read four-part series on game. From the fourth part:

Politically and economically, the laws now favor the Cads over the Dads.  The ease of divorce for the mother and the very economic reality that the man gets hit with child support and alimony (for life in California), not to mention the increasing rate of cuckolding by the wife, means that marriage is no longer a good bet for a man.  Arguably, it is the most alpha choice there is because of the huge amount of risk taking involved, but alphas take huge risks that provide huge potential payoffs.  Marriage doesn’t do this.

Read the rest, NOW.

Chuck confesses to being LJBF’ed in his youth:

Her name was Victoria, and she used me. Not for anything cool like sex or drugs; I didn’t do either of those at the time. Victoria used me to get into a school dance. As a junior in high school, my free-time was spent playing basketball with my friends, golfing with my friends, driving to the Big City 15 minutes aways with my friends. I was eyeball deep in male-bondage quicksand. My inner circle provided protection from rejection from girls and commiseration on the same subject, but all-in-all I was content. Needless to say, I was not the well-worn buffalo soldier of male-female relations that I am today.

You live, you learn.

Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech talks about the Catalog of Anti-Male Shaming Tactics:

The Catalog allows us to identify women (or men) who hate/are against men even if they claim to not be feminists.  There is no reason to use a shaming tactic against a man unless the person using it is afraid the man is right about whatever issue is being discussed.  (For example, manginas in the Christian Church use shaming language against unmarried men.)  The use of shaming tactics tells us a lot about the person using it.

Always remember and never forget what shaming language looks like.

Sofia blogs on sexual repression and its effects on human behavior:

I’ve learned both from academic theorists, and my limited life experience, that our basic human impulses (sex & aggression — eros & thanatos, if you will)  can never be perfectly eradicated. These energies can be sublimated to an extent, but in a less intense medium. For example, sexual energies can be diverted into intellectual pursuits, but this diversion plateaus at a certain point. We need to fulfill our urges.

You can’t fight the sex drive, no sirree.

Novaseeker takes down the theory that having an excess of men will be good for marriage:

It would appear, then, that even if the sex ratio hypothesis is correct, and even if we take its assumptions at face value concerning female preference for DADs, the lack of hypergamously attractive DADs following graduation means that the “effective” sex ratio for educated women is low — hence the success of CADs, Game and the like. So even if the sex ratio theory is correct, it doesn’t really add up to much social benefit due to the glaringly low sex ratio when you factor in hypergamy as a core element of female mate selection and attraction. Instead of having a stable situation, you have a relatively small number of hypergamously attractive males being able to “force” their own caddishness on educated women, and a relatively large number of under-educated, under-achieving men who are not suitable mates for their female counterparts — meaning that the overall sex ratio is not really a social benefit.

Shoving the pin of facts into the balloon of lies – all in a day’s work.

Finally, my favorite ladyblogger, Alias Clio, has some shocking news:

Aside from her lingering bout with pneumonia, which really put a damper on her enthusiasm for blogging and which only really ended in the middle of August, she has been somewhat preoccupied, because she is going to get married.

Congratulations, Clio, though I know a couple of folks who are going to be disappointed upon hearing this…