If women are so much better than men at everything…

Fidelbogan recently posted an extensive discussion on female supremacy in PDF format. I highly recommend that you check it out. While reading it, I noticed a common thread among the female supremacists – many of them argued that women have ALWAYS been superior to men and that the only reason they haven’t taken over the world before is because men kept them down. To which I ask:

If you so smart, why ain’t you rich?

If women are better than men in every way, how were men able to keep them down throughout most of human history? Why couldn’t these females figure out how to throw off their shackles? Many oppressed peoples throughout history were able to liberate themselves or at least made the attempt; women not only never liberated themselves from male oppression, they never even tried to for most of history. Advances in womens’ rights in the West would never have gotten off the ground if it weren’t for the support of men. What does that say about women?

Some of these female supremacists state that the only reason men were able to dominate women because of their superior upper body strength. Well, if that’s the case, what’s the use of all of women’s supposed superiority if men can undermine it with their sole, solitary advantage?

As an aside, Afrocentrists and their white hangers-on use the exact same arguments. From crackpots who advance the bogus “black Egypt” theory to leftists who claim the sole reason why Africa is a third world hole is white oppression and exploitation, the underlying logic is identical. If blacks were/are so superior to whites, how were those crafty pale devils able to steal everything blacks had from under them AND keep them oppressed to this day? None of them ever ponder this logical contradiction.