Article here. Excerpt:
'Recently a committee of the Canadian Parliament spent five months studying the beliefs of its own citizens and concluded that dissent from feminism is a growing extremist threat.
I want to make a harder claim than "the report is biased." I want to argue the causal arrow runs backwards. The pushback the state calls radicalization is a reaction against a radicalization that already happened.
First Principles: why a system calls independence toxic, conformity safety, and dissent harm.
Beneath the Surface: the report in its own words, the psychology of why the state recruits the feminine instinct and the compliant man, the data on who is actually being radicalized, and why strength itself had to be renamed a pathogen.
From the Archives: Jung and Arendt, who watched an atomized, care-hungry population become the raw material of the mass movement a century ago.'
