When it comes to A Voice For Men it’s a case of two steps forward, one step back. AVFM had really cleaned up many of the things that I had issue with so it was with great surprise that AVFM allowed a pro-game article. One thing AVFM always had going for it was its strong anti-game stance. At least in the comments, there was men pointing out how game is a scam and otherwise useless to the MRM.
One in the things in the article (and some of the comments) was how the MRM and gamers supposedly have common interests. I will show you this is false. The problem is that the so called manosphere has its own version of the U.S. constitution’s supremacy clause. For those of you who aren’t aware the supremacy clause in the U.S. constitution says the U.S. constitution is the supreme law of the land so if any law conflicts with the U.S. constitution, it is invalid.
In the so called manosphere when anything conflicts with white vagina worshiping nationalism, it gets declared invalid. You can see a good example of this in the comments to a recent article at Return of Court Jesters. The article is about women during WWII in allied countries who would have sex with Nazi soldiers while their men were off fighting the Nazis. It’s a good article showing the depraved nature of women. However, the commenters at Return of Court Jesters objected to the article citing a bunch of conspiracies theories, antisemitism, and justifications how the Nazis soldiers were “alphas” because they were defending the white race. This is a case where the reality of women came into conflict with white vagina worshiping nationalism, and the readership of Return of Court Jesters showed that in such conflicts they will always choose white vagina worshiping nationalism and throw away anti-feminism.
Since white vagina worshiping nationalism, antisemitism, and conspiracy theory overlaps heavily and is pervasive in the so called manosphere, anti-feminism is in constant conflict with white vagina worshiping nationalism. Between that and the so called manosphere’s supremacy clause, any anti-feminism in the so called manosphere is effectively negated into meaninglessness. This is why the MRM (and MGTOW) have no common interests with the so called manosphere. It’s not a matter of agree to disagree on some issues. The so called manosphere’s ruling ideology of white vagina worshiping nationalism always comes first for them and is pervasive enough any possible common interest MRAs (or MGTOW) may have with them effectively doesn’t exist.
