Recently that fruitcake Brent left all butthurt that I didn’t buy into his delusions and/or lies.  (I’m not sure if Brent was delusional or outright lying.  Quite possibly both.)  I thought it might be good for all of you reading this to see just how bad conspiracy theorists are, to see their levels of delusion and/or lies they tell us.  Since I don’t have days to spend writing this post, here are just two examples of Brent’s delusions and/or lies.

First, Brent posted this video that “proved” that his insane conspiracy theories about HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program).  Brents bullshit about that video is blockquoted.

Dude the first fucking video the politician blatantly admits to using weather manipulation technology to starve millions of americans for NWO objectives, in those exact words.

HAARP can be proven, the man in that video in the UN conference room blatantly admitted to using weather manipulation technology to starving millions of Americans for NWO objectives, and even went on to say they’ve been using this sort of technology since the Viet Nam era…

Everything that Brent said is wrong.  No politician in that video admits to using HAARP and/or other weather manipulation technology to “starve millions of Americans for NWO objectives”.  There is a guy in the video claiming that about HAARP but he is not a politician nor in charge of anything to “admit” anything.  The video also doesn’t take place in a “UN conference room”.

What really happened in that video?  Bob Fletcher, then the spokesman for the Militia Of Montana, was testifying before Congress after the Oklahoma City bombing.  Fletcher is not a politician, was not at the UN, and was making a claim not an admission “about weather manipulation technology”.  Fletcher also never produced the “proof” that he claimed to have.  Every single thing Brent said about that video was wrong.

Second, Brent said this article ”proves” his insane conspiracy theories that the NWO has technology (or will soon) to read people’s minds.  Again I have blockquoted Brent’s bullshit.

The brain chip article blatantly admits to using technology that can read peoples’ thoughts.

Hell in the brain chip article the Yale guy studying it is from some Skull and Bones fraternity or something, states that the “common man has no right to develope their own brain.”

All of this is wrong.  The article has to do with a chip in the brain of a paralyzed person not “mind reading”.  The article says “Mr Nagle’s device, called BrainGate, consists of nearly 100 hair-thin electrodes implanted a millimetre deep into part of the motor cortex of his brain that controls movement.”  In other words it can’t read your thoughts.  It’s intercepting electrical impulses that order your body to move.  The professor doing the research is not from Yale.  He is John Donoghue, an expert on neuroscience at Brown University in Rhode Island, and he never says “the common man has no right to develop his own brain”.  Everything Brent said about that article is wrong.

I could point out how everything Brent said was wrong but I don’t want to spend days on this post.  I don’t think Brent is just insane.  He is producing too much bullshit to be insane.  He has to be lying and know he’s lying (most likely in addition to being insane).  Since he left here butthurt because I wouldn’t tolerate his conspiracy theorist bullshit.  He moved over to PMAFT’s blog, (under the name “Warren”) but here is what PMAFT had to say about him.

Of course he is [a fruitcake] but I was trying to draw him out into saying even more ludicrous things. I was also hoping that he would actually name some men he thinks are government agents. Instead he’s being a weasel about it. The words you see written in the manosphere were written by actual men, not some vague government agents. Every comment and post here was written by an actual man. To say that some of these men are “government agents” is absurd and underhanded. If he has a charge to make against a specific man or several specific men in the manosphere he should make it and stand behind it. The insane morons who have accused me of working for or running the Illuminati at least were willing to stand behind their insanity and be coherent enough to say that an actual person, me in this case, was Illuminati. Instead, Warren is being a weasel since he want to make vague charges in general but refuses to actually stand behind his ideas and accept the destination of where his ideas take him.

Why am I writing this post?  Don’t we all know that Brent/Warren is a nutjob?  Yes we do but I wanted an example of the bullshit that is par for the course for conspiracy theorists.  Every time a conspiracy theorist says something I’m able to find out why it’s wrong after 30 seconds of google searching.  Like with the gamers the conspiracy theorists are retarding the progress of the cause of mens rights.  That is why posts like this are necessary.