Tamerlame brought this article from AVFM to our attention where AVFM calls out Roosh (and Matt Forney) for selling piece of shit “supplements” and game that doesn’t work and doesn’t exist. While I liked a good portion of the article, one of the problems with it is that AVFM will be in bed Roosh again next week. They have a yo-yo relationship.
There is a fundamental flaw in the article, namely accusing Roosh (and Forney) of being rapists. If you believe what they have written, they may be rapists. However, that is all predicated on whether Roosh (and Forney) are getting laid or not. By definition rapists get laid. A man who doesn’t get laid can not logically be a rapist. If you know that game is bullshit, if you have talked to men who have had disastrous results from trying game (as Dean Esmay, the author, has), why would you believe that Roosh and Forney are rapists given that their alleged rape exploits are based on game working? On the one hand Dean Esmay says that game doesn’t work. On the other hand, he is accusing Roosh and Forney of being game based rapists which mean that game must work at some level. Why doesn’t AVFM go in for the kill shot on these two and point out that their rape stories are lies so that they can pretend they are getting laid? Why doesn’t AVFM point out that it costs $6500 for Roosh to get laid? Even when AVFM is attacking Roosh, it is still propping up Roosh.
There are two possible reasons I can see that AVFM isn’t going in for the kill. One, they’re going to flip flop on Roosh again. Two, like with the rest of the manuresphere, they won’t give up on game because it would be an admission that the best thing for any man to simply avoid women. AVFM is too filled with tradcons and other assorted old guys to speak the truth about women.
