The masculine world can look very exciting on its face; difficult qualifications, demanding careers, product launches, engineering projects, huge sums of money flying around and so forth. A man at the pinnacle of his career doesn’t have a minute to waste. He needs the best of everything and a team of people working for him.
It’s very easy for a young woman to look at this world and feel that she wants her shot at the big time, her piece of the pie, but in fact a clever woman can achieve that much more easily by attaching herself to a high-flying man, being a super wife, and bearing his children. Far from being a cop-out, this is the ultimate female role. Thanks to Lauren Powell, Steve Jobs got some medical treatment and stayed alive an extra decade. Few people know the role she played in Apple’s success, but she does.
As Marilyn Monroe said, “A woman that wants to compete with a man has very little ambition.”
It’s a well-accepted red pill fact that a woman’s peak sexual value is around 23, so talking a woman into some high-flying career is tantamount to wasting the best years of her life. Now I am not saying that a woman isn’t perfectly capable, because there are certainly some successful career women. Others, like the CEOs of IBM, Xerox, and HP, have pissed massive corporations down the drain with unimaginative leadership. What I am saying is that men and women need to make more informed choices when they are young—the very period during which feminism pulls the wool over women’s eyes.
Four distinct paths for career women
Cramming women into the masculine energy of the corporate environment is frankly irresponsible, unsuitable for many women, and in most cases is nothing but the product of pure penis-envy from ugly feminists. A woman in her mid 20s is far more able to land a wealthy and supportive husband that can be with her through her most fertile childbearing years. What’s more is that the “excitement” of the corporate world leads women down one of several wrong paths:
1. They “retire” to have children in their early 30s and become full-time housewives. This wastes more than a decade of high-level training and skills that could have gone to someone who might have put those resources to better use over a longer term.
2. They find that eventually being a homemaker after their prime age is too tedious and mundane after all the excitement in the male world. They are essentially taking on a role that they have no experience or training for.
3. They are torn between family and career responsibilities, carrying out neither to their full potential.
4. They find that they cannot cut it in the corporate environment, that their chosen field was too demanding, or rather more dull than they had anticipated.
We already know that women are rarely happy—giving them two paths to choose from and then telling them they can have their cake and eat it too, is like turbocharging a pre-existing condition. Regardless of whether they failed or succeeded in the corporate world, childcare is a completely different type of mindset. There isn’t really a higher education suited to this field, in large part because higher education has always focused on endeavors centered around masculine-type energies.
Childcare and homemaking is an endless daily cycle of routine and minor tasks. There is a massive satisfaction to be had in raising kids (it is after all the most important role of all), but not if you are looking for more short term gratification, creative accomplishment, social validation and so forth; accolades that men (and women) find in careers. Having children is very hard work and needs some real preparation. Anyone thinking they can have kids and carry on as if nothing has happened, is more irresponsible than a drunk driver.
What drives families is a very real “love” or caring emotional kinship that is largely devoid from the masculine world of commerce and finance. A family cannot be driven purely by performance. It’s the female nurturing energy that supports the family unit. Once a woman enters higher education and the work place, she loses that quality to some degree, just as a slut loses her ability to bond and connect through sex.
Even worse is a woman with a graduate degree that actually enjoyed her career and left to have children. She is going to be more miserable than ever and perpetually bound between the challenges of wanting to go back to work and wanting to spend time with the family. Aggressive career men often cite “more time with the family” as a good reason to step down. Sometimes this is political smokescreen, but I am quite certain many men have felt frustrated at the demands their careers placed on them and the family time they missed.
The path to dissatisfaction
Putting a woman through higher education and a 10+ year corporate career is loading her life up for complete dissatisfaction in all areas. Neither can she be completely settled as a mother and wife, nor can she fully commit to her career with children in tow. If feminism has done anything, it has fed everyone the most brutally disappointing lie.
Rather than validate women as mothers, home makers, and wives, and establish some fair and reasonable compensation and rights in that department, while seeking to bolster women with better skills and training in those fields, feminism has instead told women to abandon those roles completely in favor of not only competing with men, but expecting them to take on childcare and housework duties. This leaves many men demotivated and depressed, unable to fill their biological role. You can NOT have it all. The lucky men abandon family ideals and play the field, but deep down they too know something is broken.
How to reverse the trend
Men who want to settle down and have children and a stable home life are wise to pick a young woman. A girl who gets married to an older man while she is in her early 20s, can already have a couple of children 10+ years old by the time she hits her mid-30s. She can do it without financial or career burdens (that’s the man’s role) and she can have a relevant and current education as the children grow up. Then, she can start hitting the corporate environment as a real adult with real skills in her late 30s. By the time she is in her late 30s, her children will be grown up, her husband will be mellowing, and she will be far better placed than the career hag that’s caught trying to have her cake and eat it and then wonders “where have all the good men gone?”
Men do not want to marry some tired-out late 30s bossy middle management troll, who’s only a few years shy of menopause and needs $50,000 of IVF treatments just to have a 3-month premature spawn. This is an abuse of technology that should be outlawed. The world is awash with starving children—how can any sane person force their body to have children under the current global circumstances, when they made a life choice to sacrifice their fertile years for a career?
If feminism wanted to do something positive for the world, it would have backed women to have real training from 16-20 in areas of childcare, homemaking and so forth, while encouraging men to knock up young hot wives and build families and communities. A couple of my female friends have diplomas in catering and hospitality and they do a damn fine job as homemakers.
As the man ages he’s less likely to stray, still having a young pretty wife and feeling comfortable in a solid family base, in which both partners are happy and the woman has plenty of time in her later years to find herself a suitable career and avoid the empty nest syndrome or empty call of cougardom. What’s more, her income would give the man the chance to spend more time at home when the kids are older, less childish, and more in need of male authority, as opposed to feminine supervision.
Feminism’s role in the decline
Feminism encourages women to throw away their best years slutting it up in university and some dead-end career she either fails at or winds up compromised in because of children. It demotivates men by watering down the workplace and universities, while giving them little incentive to be successful and build a family and community. There are natural laws that cannot be changed. Instead of trying to compete with men, feminism could have looked for solutions in which all parties win.
The only parties that feminism benefits are the sprawling nanny state, along with the universities and corporations who are only too happy to have the pool of potential candidates watered down as much as possible. Imagine all the billions spent on pointless divorces, with the legions of men (and women) ruined in bitter separations, not to mention the children who’d love to have a stable upbringing. The only ones getting rich are the lawyers and corporate shareholders, while government can more easily afford it’s 20th century bureaucratic nightmare because the labor pool is watered down with women of childbearing years. Equality has no benefit to the individual, either male or female, and if women would start putting their hands up, we could change the social dynamics for the better.
We are not bacteria that can just multiply at will. Children are a 10+ year commitment of mothering-type energy and another 10-year commitment of formative and fatherly energy. Only a father has the authority to guide his children through their teenage years. If we look in nature we find that the more advanced an organism is, the greater differences there are between the male and female. A male shrimp is not that different from a female, whilst a male lion serves entirely different roles than the female lion. Humans have been successful in large part due to this SEXUAL division of duties, skills, and labor. I’m sorry, but a huge part of that is genetically built in.
Men are better designed both physically and mentally to fill more masculine roles, as females are to fill feminine roles. What’s more is that you cannot underestimate nature’s instincts. Even a lion cub that grew up in a zoo with no parents knows how to stalk and hunt prey – how is that? Female children are immediately drawn to dolls and prams, while male children seek guns and building sets. No one tells them these things, it is pure instinct.
Feminism is beyond insane if it thinks it can, within a couple of generations, rewire hundreds of thousands of years of evolution. Frankly it’s nothing more than a smokescreen for communism, a seemingly strange but increasingly relevant bedfellow. Break the family unit and the state can be father to everyone just like Mao, Stalin or Hitler was.
Read More: Why Men Need Dumber Women
