wimmin keeping it real
Once again, College proves to be an excellent muse. Take this exchange in -of all things- Industrial Psychology.
Teacher (a woman of course, who else teaches this stuff): So, it has been found that women in particular regard their duties as a mother above all else, so a company should accommodate to that, by putting daycare and other benefits.
Your brave hero then musters his social deafness courage and asks:
Me: Why should an employer put up with that instead of not hiring women in the first place?
Teacher: Well, that would be being exclusive and that’s bad. Also, the law says it so. And there’s the difficult case of that a pregnant woman isn’t productive but she should be hired because, again, the law says that you can’t ask about that in an interview and she needs the job. Although, as I was a boss of a college department before this, I have to admit that dealing with women is a bitch.
All of the above paraphrased, of course.
So, with all the recent talk of credentialism and pseudo studies done for the acolytes of the religion of leftism, that, of course, have a huge axe to grind, I thought: If they can’t do it, why I cant?
So, present men, occasional women, I want YOU!
Your experiences with women in the workplace:
What were they?
Were they good, bad?
Why were they good or bad?
How did they affect the other employees?
How did they affect the employers?
How did they affect the company as a whole?
All of the above will be gathered and the results published in the next week, so stay tuned! It may even give us our own study to quote, I mean, is not like the studies of the lamestream media are less full of bias (a study about people without bias is hard, you know).
