I've seen two posts recently which cite the violent death graph by the CDC as evidence that men suffer more violence, but I find this argument too simplistic. Suicide can be erroneously explained by saying that men are emotionally weaker than women, and feminists will draw false equivalency to rape concerning homicide; all violent deaths include both suicide and homicide, with the small margin left being blamed on men taking stupid risks.

This page offers a much better starting point as the same graph is included within context of the CDC; however, you should be pointing to the third image down, Youth Violence: National Statistics. By starting with this graph you invite criticism of limited age range, but that's an argument we can deal with. The most often cited types of violence against women are rape and domestic abuse; so, what if we can use those very statistics, and leave feminists without ammunition?

This source shows that the majority of domestic abuse occurs before the age of 24, while this source, often used by feminists, shows that most rape happens before the age of 24 as well. From here we can point out that, despite most of the issues which effect women "disproportionately" occurring within this age range, men suffer more violence; and, as such, we can only expect that gap to widen after the age of 24.

Lastly, I like to point out that excess female fear of victimhood is fairly baseless, but rather feminism teaches women to be scared and feel weak; patriarchy is just the new boogieman.

EDIT: Grammar; also, from here any argument about men committing more violence can be met with common feminist arguments verbatim: victim blaming, guilt by association, etc.