This is an incredibly shitty take. It's like how some people used to say "All Lives Matter" only to undermine "Black Lives Matter"
Technically you're right, we should help people out. But you can't personally help everyone. Also people tend to support one group over another. For example, I'm Indian. It's more likely that in an evacuation situation, I'll favor Indians over other nationalities. Is that bigotry?
If they wish to raise aid for women, why are you so bothered about it? This is the example feminists use to show how MRAs are solely talking about men's issues only to undermine feminism. This is not a badge of honor. You didn't make a controversial take, you made a very insensitive take.
The idea that only women should be evacuated/aided is wrong, I don't disagree. But the viewpoint that aid to women should be denied and spread across all genders is also wrong. this is a demand for aid. Some people may wish to explicitly help women. If they receive it, at least they're coming out safe! Half a loaf is better than none.
Honestly I could have summarized all of this in just "Fuck off. Shitty take. You deserve to be banned." But it's necessary you see the errs of that statement. You're looking at this politically. Fuck it's not even r/feminism, it's r/women. It's like going to r/Afghanistan and asking why don't you share your aid with the Cuban refugees. Why should you bother if r/women is collecting aid for women? Just to look an edge lord? Who are you actually helping here?
Because your comment didn't add anything which helped men or women. It only makes others feel bad if they're helping Afghan women out.
Nobody has answered my question, still.
Imho, they're not obligated to. You made a very shitty take. Not everyone has the patience to answer to edge lords. To be very frank, if I were a moderator on the subreddit, I'd ban you too. Things would have been different for say r/feminism, who claims equality. r/women is clearly a women's space. There's no doubt on that.
And that would, again, be my response to you.
Which you have not been able to provide either! What you're doing is making a humanitarian cause a political one. That's like going to play cards with a friend who wears a cross and you start talking about how Christianity is bad and vile bla bla.
I'll ask you the same question, who did you help? What did you better? If not I think your ban is pretty justified and it's not a badge of honor
[–]wdean8358 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]adoctorswife 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Redwan777 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]L0SERlambda 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Devatroninator 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]L0SERlambda 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Devatroninator 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheLostTinkerer3 points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
This is an incredibly shitty take. It's like how some people used to say "All Lives Matter" only to undermine "Black Lives Matter"
Technically you're right, we should help people out. But you can't personally help everyone. Also people tend to support one group over another. For example, I'm Indian. It's more likely that in an evacuation situation, I'll favor Indians over other nationalities. Is that bigotry?
If they wish to raise aid for women, why are you so bothered about it? This is the example feminists use to show how MRAs are solely talking about men's issues only to undermine feminism. This is not a badge of honor. You didn't make a controversial take, you made a very insensitive take.
The idea that only women should be evacuated/aided is wrong, I don't disagree. But the viewpoint that aid to women should be denied and spread across all genders is also wrong. this is a demand for aid. Some people may wish to explicitly help women. If they receive it, at least they're coming out safe! Half a loaf is better than none.
Honestly I could have summarized all of this in just "Fuck off. Shitty take. You deserve to be banned." But it's necessary you see the errs of that statement. You're looking at this politically. Fuck it's not even r/feminism, it's r/women. It's like going to r/Afghanistan and asking why don't you share your aid with the Cuban refugees. Why should you bother if r/women is collecting aid for women? Just to look an edge lord? Who are you actually helping here?
[–]adoctorswife 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]L0SERlambda 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheLostTinkerer1 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
Wut! Bruh you being serious? The entire subreddit is about women's discussions. Why should they be morally obligated to talk about men in Afghanistan?
Again the same question, who are you helping here? Who has benefited from the comment? What did you achieve apart for just showing your bigotry?
[–]L0SERlambda 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Keyto3 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheLostTinkerer1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Because your comment didn't add anything which helped men or women. It only makes others feel bad if they're helping Afghan women out.
Imho, they're not obligated to. You made a very shitty take. Not everyone has the patience to answer to edge lords. To be very frank, if I were a moderator on the subreddit, I'd ban you too. Things would have been different for say r/feminism, who claims equality. r/women is clearly a women's space. There's no doubt on that.
Which you have not been able to provide either! What you're doing is making a humanitarian cause a political one. That's like going to play cards with a friend who wears a cross and you start talking about how Christianity is bad and vile bla bla.
I'll ask you the same question, who did you help? What did you better? If not I think your ban is pretty justified and it's not a badge of honor
[–]-HawasKaPujari--1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Bong?
[–]TheLostTinkerer2 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Wut?