Normie reddits latest fixation on "power imbalances" is not merely contradictory, it defeats the very purpose of relationships being freely consensual if they can't happen between "different" people.

Ironic that this wish to force-fuck-equity on the sphere of human mate selection grows the same tree as Petersons "enforced monogamy" principle -- only that the couples should be properly status-wealth-looks-age-n-count "matched".

Women, rightfully so, themselves reject equity when it comes to dating, they say that "pussy is not charity" and that Peterson's idea of "enforced monogamy" is outrageous as they should never have to be made to date unattractive men just to balance out the inequalities (some men having sex every day, others never) produced by the dating market. So aren't men in age-gaps relationships perfectly entitled say the same? -- that they have no obligation to turn down romantic opportunity with a younger chick and date according to what 3rd gen feminists consider his proper age-carrer-lifestage match?

Why do some feminists suddenly start behaving like mr.enforced monogamy here? Expecting that what ought to be freely consensual , to be subject to regulations and restrictions to reach an abstract ideal of "equity" no one even seems to agree what it is?