I’m going to address a subset of men in here. It would be boring to state that every time so I will call this subset NF/NW, as in “no fuck = no worth”.

NF/NW here seem to be associating a man’s worth with his ability to have casual sex in high quantities. Even the jargon seems to point that out, as guys having many instances of casual sex are the alpha, the top tier, the prime male, the apex of masculinity, etc. Outside of casual sex, there’s no worth to men in this sunset’s view.

Now I think most NF/NW would agree that women are having sex with men who they consider are worth at least something and, according to some, even only with high valuable men.

Part of being at least somewhat valuable, for women, is knowing it and owning it (I think we can all agree with this, red pill, blue pill, rainbow pill). If you think you’re worth nothing then you do, in fact, are worthless in a woman’s eyes.

If NF/NW think a man’s worth is directly determined by the amount of casual sex they’re having, then if no casual sex = worthless in their own eyes.

If a NF/NW guy not having casual sex, he knows he’s worthless. If he knows he’s worthless, he’s not somewhat valuable to women and not eligible to fuck.

The belief system of a NF/NW man, who is not having sex, puts him automatically out of the game, unable to ever be worth anything in his very own standards, self fulfilling the prophecy of why he’s not fucking.

No fuck = no worth. No worth = no Fuck. An endless loop.

Holding that view on how the world works literally makes any of them an instant loser, without a chance of winning at all.

In order for a NF/NW (who’s not having sex) to fuck he must necessarily stop believing in what he believes.