In the OP, a man gets his ass kicked for hitting a girl. Don't believe in abusing women, I do believe in defending myself. Seems the man was the attacker but that is beside the point.

It was what I found next that really pissed me off. Especially because I've seen this.

Why is it that abuse is only prosecuted, hell only acknowledged, when it is a man hitting a women? Does a man not feel physical or mental pain? It seems to me abuse is negligible and is fundamentally tolerated in our society as long as a FEMALE has not suffered any sort or pain or detriment.

This reminded me of this story in which a man can be provoked and humiliated by a woman and is not legally provided with an escape route. No matter what he does to stop the abuse, all a woman has to do is fabricate a story with her playing the victim role and it is certain to be taken as Gospel. And just like the Gospel, it is taken as fact with out a shred of evidence.

His reaction was excessive and he may have been mentally unstable, but that does not take away from a core belief and philosophy of our feminized culture. That philosophy is that women are inherently innocent, and men are inherently guilty. And as we have seen, evidence is not an issue. Her voice has much more destructive power than actions.

It's unnerving that forfeiting your defense and NOT retaliating against a women's abuse can still result in the same punishment you would receive if you DID actually strike her, or at least used some sort of physical prevention (or verbal). These unspoken but highly enforced rules of punishing non-existent abuse and forbidding self-protection that only men are subject to is mind numbing. It's almost Orwellian. Right up there with thought-crime.