Up until now, asides from one piece of proof, we haven't really had any philosophical proof for AWALT. However, today, I intend to change that. While this isn't the whole picture, here's an attempt at finding at least one pixel.

Let's discuss the philosophical proof that, well, all women are evil.

To do this, we must ask the question first: What is the root of evil?

The answers is when you prioritize things other than ethics as your #1, and when you don't know what is ethical.

For example, let's say that you were given 500$ to do some evil shit, like abuse a kitten.

The ethics clearly says no, the money clearly says yes. Men will clearly choose no, women will clearly choose yes.

The second point needs no example. If you don't know what is ethical, you're likely to only do what is ethical for a fraction of the time.

For all women to be philosophically evil, at least one of the two things has to be true:

1. Being a woman is defined with prioritizing things other than ethics first and foremost. If a woman is capable of prioritizing ethics first and foremost, she is no longer a woman, they/he are now nonbinary or male with a strong feminine expression.  2. Being a woman is defined as being unable to know ethics. If a woman is able to know ethics, she is no longer a woman, they/he are now nonbinary or male with a strong feminine expression.

However, even if point 2 was true, that wouldn't make women philosophically evil, just terminally misguided. However, we well know that they know what is ethical and not, similar or often to a far greater extent than men do (not to generalize however), so that point ends there. It's now: Either prove point 1, or go home.

For this, we must look to the Hermetic Principles.

The seventh principle, the principle of gender.

Men and women are the opposite. Speaking in terms of sex-expression, men represent, in the body, fight and flight, whereas women represent rest and digest. After all, the role of the father is to get the child on their feet, get going. The mother however caresses her children, allows them rest and digest.

If, we also acknowledge that anger is a fight or flight feeling, and that anger is an emotion which can never be dishonest, we align masculinity with a ceaseless honest fight. In turn, we align women with dishonest deception for dishonest purposes.

That's why phenomenon such as "alpha fux beta bux" exists; rather than robbing a man at gunpoint, here's a rest-and-digest way of gaining for dishonest purposes.

That's why, well, immoral men are the result of either supernatural phenomenon, or fear and ignorance, whereas moral actions coming from women are simply a result of deception.

Now we understand without a doubt, how evil women are. Men fundamentally represent a near ascetic fight for ethics, women represent a gluttonous attempt to spread evil.

I await to hear everyone's thoughts on this!