India's Tyrannical Supreme Court rejects to entertain PIL for 'National Commission for Men' to deal with Suicides and Domestic Violence from Wives. [Swipe Left for their ReAsOnInG]

The Supreme Court is supposed to be a place for justice, evidence and objective logical reasoning.

a) Is it logical to dismiss suicides and DV against men with 'whataboutery' of women's issues? How is women's data relevant while addressing issues against men? Are we now using women's issues to suppress men's issues?

b) Is it logical to draw false parallels? DV (against Women) and Dowry Deaths (Includes suicides by wives within 7 yrs of marriage) are covered under their designated laws but Men's DV, Harassment for Money and Marital Suicides do not have the same and equal legislative protection.

c) Is it logical to use 'Hearsay?' - "NoBoDy wAnTs tO cOmMiT sUiCiDeS." Really?

d) "Do YoU wAnT aSsOcIaTiOn FoR pEoPlE wHo MaY cOmMiT sUiCiDe In ThE fUTuRe?" - says SUPREME F*KING COURT? Am I supposed to believe that an 'Appeal to Ridicule' is an argument by an institution that is supposed to uphold Justice?

India's unelected Collegium system has been infiltrated and hijacked by the powerful 'lobby groups.'

I'm furious. How do you feel reading this? Are our Men Safe?