I'd like to hear other in depth opinions on this

I'm not referring to the whole play, but to the parts that are usually cited to judge the knight as a misogynist. Especially the conversation where the knight says "women do just damage to men" or something like that. Put a modern day woman behind those words, and she could tell them in a TV show without incurring any trouble, she'd even gain a following maybe. Anyone calling the knight a misogynist should be calling mysandrist a woman saying the exact same things... We call her stunning and brave instead

... Then, hurt in her ego, she converts the knight from his refusal of relationships, because he didn't act as a simp as soon he crossed the Inn entrance. Sexual orientation conversions are mostly known to happen through sexual violence, but they're wrong for profound reasons beside the forceful way they are carried through.

Think about how progressist culture would receive this story: in a reality show a handsome man, hurt in his feelings, converted a radical feminist back to dating because she was the only girl not to flirt with him. "She probably had valid reasons for avoiding men" is something we wouldn't hear on TV about a mgtow man.