I don't like doing these "look at what this person said" post, but holy shit this women is too insane for you guys to not know.
Yesterday there was a post in r/AskMenRelationships asking "why do heterosexual cismen refuse to commit to relationships" and everyone hated it. The post. TLDR: she is a femcel who believes incel.io / incel.is is a domestic terrorist organization that is growing rapidly. All you have to do is read this and you'll get it. She also believes the following: "I hate to educate you but 97% of all sexual offenders are male. Even men fear male predators in gay community or other circumstances let's say prison." (her)
In short, some random, obscure, in the neck of the woodlands, online forum has men who call women "war pigs" and this is the first horsemen of the coming misogyny apocalypse, apparently. I made this my argument against her, calling out the hypocrasy by pointing out feminist-endorsed rhetoric like "men are our natural predators" (me).
Now, I had wanted to ignore her, but I couldn't after I read what she said here.
I'm sorry but opinions, like yours, are perceptions not facts. Patriarchy is real - have a look in nature what rule applies in nature? Female choice. Who raped women, betrayed natural selection for 10.000 years and forced women to serve as sex and household slaves while raising the offspring of rape? Toxic men that wouldn't have been chosen by any women voluntarily. We are all descendants of rape.
At this point, all I could see was her saying women were selectively bred by men for 10,000 years. At that point, I died from laughter and choked on my own saliva.
I called her out on this and it only went down hill from there.
Here's my response (here), basically there's a whole slew of societies in which rape was not a norm nor endorsed or allowed all across the globe. The opposite is also the case, unfortunately, but I believe they are more a minority not a majority from what I learned a while ago. This is feminism proper 101 and she has failed. I also made it very clear that in order for a man to become a rapist, he must have an insecure attachement (there are exceptions, obviously). She then says this:
As someone who holds a degree in forensic psychology and criminal justice, I can assure you that attachment style is essential in forming all types of relationships with other human beings BUT NO PREDICTOR FOR RAPE
[...]
Majority of women are victims of a man they trusted since its her boyfriend /husband /ex partner or man she is dating. Only 7% of all rapes reported are committed by strangers. So the attachment in a dating situation is already there.....
And this was too good (my reply here covers everything that needs to be said). A person with a forensic psychology degree, and a patriarchy believer, who doesn't understand attachment theory. It only gets worse from here...
MEN RAPE BECAUSE THEY CAN - THEY HAVE MEANS AND OPTIONS AND IF THEY DON'T FEAR CONSEQUENCES THEY RAPE EACH OTHER OR WOMEN. THEY EVEN RAPE ANIMALS. RAPE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DESIRABILITY OF VICTIMS NOR THE INTENTION TO FORM A RELATIONSHIP AND FAILING TO BECAUSE OF ATTACHMENT STYLE
So, she's insane. Let me show you more.
It's you who has made up his mind that "women aren't worth it" because men lack the emotional skills to get a women sexually aroused in casual sex /engage in equal relationships - men need to improve the offer or live happily alone with mastrubation. Don't weaponize your shortcomings as assumptions on why the other gender or representative of that gender is /isn't worth pursuing
I'm engaged - again you use just a simple but persistent statement all men use "blame women for the circumstances men created. You blame women for giving sex to the wrong men yet men like you believe that women deserve to get used if they were silly enough to ever trust a man." You're a textbook example of indoctrinated female hattress. Men like you get to chose which women are" only good enough to get used for sex and which are good enough to commit to"-yet this is the attitude why most men have neither - neither a woman to use for sex nor one to marry. Because every time a man is using a woman for sex he is decreasing the chanced for all other men that this women will trust a man again. I laugh so hard when we end up in a society again where men have to marry before kissing a girl to get sex. Because the easiest way according to all of the male comments here for a women to make sure she is never used for sex is to never engage in sex until marriage. According to recent biological research most of men like you will finally die out. You don't make kids that's the good thing. Women are more and more in favour with single motherhood or shared parenthood with a gay couple /sperm donator. Women are happy with mastrubation and they certainly don't miss the condescending treatment of men like you when dating. You better hurry up to get married /commitment or start saving some money for the prostitutes you gonna have to pay in your 40s to suck your dick. Again it is not women who will ever need to pay for sex or companionship
This is her response to me, and I don't even know what to say about it (comment)
Nope you don't debate with people that are more intelectual than you because you fear to expose vulnerability and being not "smart enough or prepared enough with well researched points" - you engage in invalidation, projection, blame shifting and deceiving why you commented in the first place - you feel inferior and threatened by educated females, that are neither misandric nor mysogyne, that aren't ugly single ladies falling for men's lies to commit, that try to sympathise with men and you aren't answering my very simple question "why do you, yes a man like you, refuse commitment knowing the odds for casual sex are against you and you get the better deal in heterosexual commitment?"
the guy she's responding too literally said: "I do not debate with people who believe in the Patriarchy or Trump. A waste of my intellectual energy"
Most dating apps have 70-90% male rate vs 10-30% female rate = each women has plenty of options to chose for sex. When women are looking for something causal dating is a dream - all these good looking model guys would queue in line to come over to eat your pussy - brillant. But it's actually MEN WHO DON'T GET LAID AS MUCH AS THEY PRETEND - male sexlessness is rising. So if I would be a man, I know my chances to belong to the top tier males in looks is low, I know my chances to get a good looking women to have sex with me is basically non existent, I know that men also have better Sexual satisfaction in relationship - why wouldn't I commit? Isn't it easier to just turn around and have great sex with lust and love with your partner /poly partners than swiping forevermore to hope one day you score a bad ons? Do men actually love themselves or are afraid of being dumped?
this is her going off on a dude giving a very basic "no duh" answer
Anyway, she's just venting :). You can read my whole reply to her here, where I quote all the most insane femcel schizoposting she does. I can't quote all the batshit crazy takes she has.
