See the focus vid here; the posts title describes the vids subject too.

Firstly, no one should take what these three women say seriously, at least on these matters; i actually dont want to disparage any of them beyond the disparaging replies theyve earned via their puritanical and domineering ways towards men. 

But within that limit; i aim to disparage all such thees. 

Secondly, their comments are shockingly vacuous and dont speak much towards the facts or the trial or what the jury determined; these three spend their time speaking on how the bad men online talked about the case; and act as if that was what the jury found or what the trial was ‘really about’; theyre so up in their own shit they cant distinguish between their online discoruses; and the reality of what an actual trial and justice are.  

All up in their empty heads and sickly hearts too im sure.

Diddy was found not guilty on the charges he was found not guilty of, because the jury didnt buy the #metoo and ‘yes means yes’ folks interpretation of sexual ethics to be reasonable, fair, or just; they were completely routed in other words. 

Its super basic too; all the plaintiffs who were of adult age; were found to be agents in their own lives; capable of making decisions; including bad ones, for themselves; adults are responsible for their own fucking actions. 

The plantiff(s) wanted to go to these freak offs and get fucked by a bunch of dudes; male prostitutes too; the plantiffs wanted to fuck diddy, and as far as can be discerned; there was no undue pressure upon any of them to do so; what these puritans want however; is to lynch any o black man or indeed any o man they can; its how they get off in their secret dreams. 

But especially black men, and any so called ‘creepy men’ as they say; again for these types the mere sense of ‘creep’ is more than enough to actually lynch someone; indeed many someones; as many someones as they possibly can; which is why they have so many highly illegal vigilantee justice groups online and in real life; whose soul mission and aim is to destroy as many mens lives as they possibly can.

I am not speaking of feminism or gender theory or women in general; i speaking of these three in particular and the fascistic feminist views regarding sex and sexuality they espouse; puritanism in a word 

Id encourage folks to watch their linked vid; but i assume most folks in this crowd already know the lies and bs theyre spewing; ‘there is no such thing as domestic violence against men’; or ‘sexual assault against men’; nor ought we examine‘any situation or circumstances of a relationship; rather the assumption out the gate is that women are inherent victims, men inherent perpetrators; and for it to be otherwise would be a burden of proof that men would have to show in each and every single case. 

They almost explicitly state this when they criticize the idea of reasonable doubt; as a means and measure of justice; they say, practically quoting here: ‘this is just another way to both sides domestic abuse; we all know that is all cases there is one abuser and one abusee’; they are actually arguing that we ought have no legal protections against womens accusations; how much like the tv admin they really are eh; see it yet? How these same folks work together to use; irrational fears about especially mens sexuality; to justify unleashing horrors upon the world? hm?

this stems from their per se view of the self; extreme self-centeredness; whereby all others are viewed as mere tools for their own existence; not people with real feelings and thoughts; i mean men of course; they believe all women are real; and that all women have thoughts and feelings; but to these puritan types; men may as well be aliens; and their bigotry shines like a widows toast; bottoms up bitches.   

Now, of course i dont want to entirely dissuade folks from the basic notion; it is True af that sometimes a relationship is dominated by someone doing the abuse; and in point of fact the other person(s) involved are actually legit merely defending themselves; that isnt really in dispute here tho; whats in dispute is that for these puritanical types; the answer to that is applicable in all cases and determinable beforehand simply by dint of their sexual organs. 

Id say in the currents its wildly and disproportionally women who rampantly abuse men with almost no regard, no accountability, and generally to the praise of most of society; hence ive come to assume merely due to circumstances; that is most cases the women in a relationship is at fault for the abuse within relationships. 

I doubt im wrong either. 

It isnt tho bc of women, or men, or queers; its because of bitches like these; puritanical fascistic policies such as those at the cdc noted here; and the various vigilantee justice groups like #metoo who regularly and with total impunity; destroy the lives of not rich and powerful men but just dudes they dont like; all of which encourage women to abuse men freely and as harshly as they so desire to; and oh my havent they!  

Not that it would exactly be great to do such injustices to powerful men; but the point is that these kinds of bitches like to hide; behind the veneer of respectability and leftism; by pretending that they are only going after; ‘rich and powerful men’; the reality is most dudes at least know someone whose has some; vindictive ex gf talk trash bout ‘em irl; online, in the communities, among friend and family groups and so on; to such an extent that its literally ruined their lives, and the lives of many others too. 

Thats all #metoo really is or can be; for they are puritanical in their dispositions towards sex and sexuality. 

If these people actually gave a shit ‘bout real sex crimes; theyd stop manufacturing made up ‘new sex crimes’ based on vague fucking ‘power relations’ and voodoo sex magiks and actually idk; maybe suggest that the bitches in these abusive relationships get some fucking therapy that isnt just a round of cunt licking? 

Yall do not control men; so back off. 

As noted here, all those kinds of groups are highly illegal; they do little but cyber bully people; deliberately ruining the lives and livelihoods of ordinary people; and wreck havoc on the communities within which they thrive; at a minimum they ought be shut down from all social media platforms; id say those that run it and are most active in it ought be prosecuted for the crimes theyve committed.

Id suspect theyve ruined the lives of tens of millions of people by now; not just the men theyve targeted, but the affects their behavior has had on all the people around those men so targeted; destroying healthy and good relationships; spreading irrational fears around men and their sexuality; feeding the horrors surrounding the lynching of men and the targeting of immigrant men; the targeting in sum of any and all queer men and women for that matter; anyone whose sexuality doesnt fit the ‘puritanical ethic’ they themselves suffer under; self imposed of course. 

Fwiw it is entirely plausible to have some version of those kinds of groups, which have existed for a long while; advocacy groups in other words; who utilize legal channels to prosecute sex crimes; rather than just start ruining the lives of people they dont so happen to like.  

I suspect that such isnt sufficient for these types tho; they prefer to actively murder men and little boyz with their bare hands if needs be; rather than be bothered to go through the ‘justice’ systems. 

There are still no easier or better targets for the fight against fascism than these kinds of fascistic feministic ideas; these puritanical ideals surrounding sex; and the best means towards combating them is through; real sex positivity; ‘what will make you believe this hurricane still loves you?’ So rather than leave this here where it may be construed merely as some more recent version of what ive been saying for some time now; these three on this topic at any rate; are good avatars for the puritanical and fascistic problems. 

What do we do about it though? Beyond trashing ‘em; cause we also need to do that; do not relent and show them no mercy; keep it tight tho; issue specific not person specific; they intend to give you none. 

Imma put a link to a vid for a theoretically sound sort of solution, see here; id recommend folks just watch it if they actually give a shit; i dont want to repeat it here beyond the most foundational point; good sex is not predicated upon a purely one sided self-centered view; sexuality and loves are more complex; far more pleasurable than that; and deeply more interesting too; rather i want to add to the pragmatics of sexual discourse; against these periodic puritanical freaks outs these folks seem to be having. 

Id suggest learning how to have sex with men would be a good thing for these types; assuming of course you enjoy having sex with men; but if you dont, why are you so up in our business anyway?; im quite serious too; i do not think that yall know how to either fuck or make love well; especially to men; i think that is why yall have such horrible sex and love lives too.

So i put together a little guidebook for yall ‘Sex Education About Men’; its not that long, its super basic stuff imho; i taught myself this stuff when i was pubescent; if i may quote two quietly spoken points in the vid; wake up, i like to eat good food with you too; its a real world intercultural ethic of sexualities; something that cuts through the merely aesthetic bs; and focuses on the real; and the pleasures; and the plausibilities of sexualities and loves; consent flows from that; rather than as a privation of action; towards a self-centered dispositions; loves nor sex works merely on appearance yall;) 

If one is agreeing to sit at a table of sexual and loves feasts; to what exactly ought we consent to? A tantalizing question, no?

Since i know this cant be repeated enough; just because a man or boy initiates something; it doesnt mean they are necessarily dtf; men initiate in this culture all the time by dint of the culture alone; we are unduly expected to initiate in all matters of sex and sexuality; if make up sex ought happen; a man is expected to initiate it; but that they initiated it doesnt mean they are necessarily eager to do so; its perfuctive for the man or the boy to do so.

The pressures on boys and men to initiate are instilled in us as children and enforced throughout our whole lives; im not saying there is anything wrong with boys and guys initiating; or that there is some silly ‘inherent inequality that we have to correct for bc receivers gots it better’; im saying have yall every yet thought though that simple and relevant point?

How much of the dumbest aspects of gendered discourses; stems simply from that strict adherence to that particular gendered norm; how much might be solved; simply by women and girls being courageous enough in loves and sexualities; to initiate with their lovers as a norm.

When dudes do initiate; they also may not actually already be ready to fuck either; they may want to; but that doesnt mean anyone gave them any foreplay at all; when you realize how common that actually is; i suspect youll begin to realize; the problems with such strictly held gendered roles; and the stereo type of men always dtf is; and how that stems primarily from womens irrational fears regarding male sexuality. 

In the linked piece to sex education about men, one major topic therein is how the sexual imagination; fantasy; plays a key role in ones own foreplay and in gaining back control as dudes; over our own fantasies; rather than being force feed merely our lovers fantasies; and told how wicked and vile all ours are; we dirty skanky men that is. 

I think its worth a read for anyone interested in their own sexuality, let alone their lovers; but consider the point well in terms of foreplay; for a dude there is typically little foreplay that is given to us; at all, so when were ‘setting the mood’ were also setting the mood for ourselves; that isnt either in regards to getting aroused either; so much as like; real affection attention given; the woman is supposed to have ‘done her part’ simply by being there; and passively receiving any affection given to her; as for her to actually initiate or show affection herself; would be embarrassing at least; at worst a sign of her servitude to men; and the misogyny shes suffering under.  

if this isnt particularly clear; and i suspect it may not be to too many folks; consider the classic feminist concerns regarding pornography; without dismissing the whole position entire; it has oft enough been claimed that depictions of women ‘serving men sexually’; is misogynistic. 

Just pause yall; the notion of women, fucking men in an active manner; and enjoying it, ‘servicing them sexually’; is considered misogynistic. Theyve some long winded rational in their heads as to why that may be; i wont elevate it by speaking it here; the upshot of it is all that really matters; men ought entirely obey women in all matters in bed; anything else would be ‘misogynistic’; as it ‘displays women in servitude to men’ somehow or another *waves hands around*.  

Tho im positive partly it stems from the illusion that the gender performance casts over womens eyes and the minds eyes too!; that as the receiver of attention; all that attention must mean something correct?; little doubt but that only looks like dtf when it may be a shy boy or mans glace askance at such beautiful women.

imagine that, you could read a little bit instead of talking; listen a little bit to men in your life; and just like that *poof* like fucking magic things actually happen; your own sex lives will improve; your own relationships will improve; the drama slips by and away; and we can focus on real problems. 

but i honestly think that is where we are at rn; unfortunately; yall are at that basic bitch stage in life; where you think the world is about you; drunk on the attention and deference especially men tend to give; so much so yall are shocked that it wasnt afforded to yall; in this little diddy freaky sex trial. 

Whats that also called? White womens tears? Course we gots to learn that its womens tears in general; that are the issue; not whitey; white women are a particularly virulent version; in america; but its not really a racial phenomenon at its core; racism in america did that; not ‘white women’ as such; i am however fairly certain that it is a highly gendered phenomenon; meaning women far more than men broadly speaking utilize tears in this way. 

boys dont cry after all; which is a very different and deeply interesting way that men broadly speaking manage their own emotions; Ill post more on that soon; the rhetoric in the currents stemming mostly from women; tho originating with men; on that particular topic is particularly bad and ill informed; a forthcoming retort is most deserved.  

For here imma echo a poet; ‘i wrote this for married women dreaming of cumming; folks whose hearts were broken apart; abused by marriage; its a dirty game but no ones willing to clean it; hell is not a place you go when you die; its the failure of your lifes greatest ambitions; im not controversial im just speaking the facts; i free style my destiny its not written in pages.’

Learn to leave the past yall; like an abuse wife with the kids leaving your ass; learn to love well, and learn to fuck as well;)