TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Jesus taught agree and amplify

Catch11

August 17, 2014
0 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Jesus taught agree and amplify
Author

Catch11

Upvotes 0
Comments 17
Date August 17, 2014 5:18 AM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2ds2lj/jesus_taught_agree_and_amplify/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/jesus-taught-agree-and-amplify.19556
https://theredarchive.com/post/19556
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by Catch11

Who is more alpha?

1 upvotes
July 20, 2018
/r/TheRedPill

The Reason Women Don't tend to like the powerbuilder or bodybuilder look.

0 upvotes
August 8, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Irrational Men

0 upvotes
August 18, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]sir_wankalot_here10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you read the gospels, Jesus often cracks jokes at people who shit test.

[–]DrGmorkian6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Haha.

I have heard this explained before as a class issue. Remember who Jesus hung around with and preached to. If someone from a higher class than yourself slapped you they would likely use their left hand, the hand they wiped their arse with. If you offered your other cheek, i.e. your left cheek, they would likely use their right hand. This apparently would signify you as their equal. I don't know why in this situation you wouldn't cop a backhand.

Not sure of the truth in this, but this is how it was explained.

[–]Lakey912 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Other way around.

They'd slap you on your right cheek with the back of their right hand. If you offer your left cheek they have to slap you with the palm of their right hand (as an equal) or with their left hand (which is shameful to the slapper) or back down.

[–]DrGmorkian1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was a while ago that I heard the story. Thanks for clearing it up.

[–]Lakey912 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Given he is literally the personification of the ultimate alpha (God) it's no surprise he had such mastery over situations.

You'd be surprised at just how many shit tests the Pharisees gave him in order to trip him up (they were both jealous - beta - and worried that he would incite rebellion against the Romans and undermine their power and position as arbiters between the Jews and the Romans). He passed every one with a genius that every man should learn from. This is a man who literally never broke frame; from birth until death, resurrection and ascension he had one mission from which he never strayed.

[–]1TheReason131 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The class perspective is conjecture. Jesus explained to his disciples that the reason why he was strait with them but spoke in metaphors to others was that it was easier for others to understand his teachings that way. One could on variable degrees deconstruct the stubborn beliefs of a man by metaphorical examples.

If you are pro marriage, I could ask you if a plane, based on divorce statistics, had a 50 percent chance of crashing, is it within your best interest take the chance? That would have had me thinking.

Jesus: To achieve the kingdom of God, you must be born again.

Man: Nonsense, how can an old man like myself re-enter my mothers womb and be born again.

The man rejects it as nonsense, but at the same time is begging for an explanation. His mind is open and much more receptive to Jesus opinion.

He was good.

I think the cheek thing is more of a form of maintaining frame around the oppressive Romans. But that's just speculation.

[–]1TheReason130 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

RedRed

If a Roman slapped you in those times for whatever reason, it does not matter how alpha you are. If you retaliate it will be seen as defiance, you will likely be executed or castrated publicly as an example. Ill take one on both cheeks and live to alpha another day. Being alpha is more than aggression.

[–][deleted] -1 points-1 points-1 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ManOfTomorrow515 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus put the team on his back, led his men around the middle east like a boss and held frame 99% of the time. He showed massive amounts of self control and discipline in multiple situations. Jesus liked to speak in figurative language but was also a very straight forward guy.

[–]HS-Thompson0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think Amused Mastery is a much better description of what he's up to.

Given that his dad can roast your ass or flood your whole country just becaus he's bored and all.

[–]BRAVE_DUST0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. (Matthew 21:12)

Do not think that I came to bring peace on Earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man's enemies will be the members of his household. He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. (Matthew 10:34–39)

Sure sounds submissive to me...

[+]liberaceswig-16 points-15 points-14 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

jesus didnt even exist and who gives a fuck what imaginary jesus said

[–]SFofallplaces1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Capitalization and punctuation exist. Try it.

[–]itsarusko5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes he did... There is plenty of evidence that supports Jesus walking the earth. Was he the son of God? That's to be debated, but Jesus existed.

Plus, though I'm not 'religious' I find that the Bible has some very wise teachings and RP logic.

[–]1greatspin2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

He really existed you quasi intellectual moron

[–]GhostInTheRedPill5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Real solid argument there. An opinion followed by a personal insult is all it takes to convince anyone that your position is the correct one. Why isn't this post in the sidebar?

[–]1greatspin1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

great example of agree and amplify lol. previous post was done in a hurry. Anyway, what I mean to say is, other ancient texts document the existence of a man named Jesus Christ aside from the Bible. He is not a fictional character but an actual human being who lived, and if you believe as I do, still does in heaven with the Almighty God. There I elaborated my point into a more coherent argument.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter