http://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~schaller/Psyc591Readings/GangestadSimpson2000.pdf

Take a look at this amazing paper that pretty much sums up our need for Game , establishes the alpha beta spectrum and will show just how much the god of bio mechanics is rigged against beta males. Some Excerpts

women who have both an in-pair (primary) partner and an extra-pair partner have patterns of orgasms that facilitate the retention of sperm from the extra-pair partner.

Also the economic freedom of women has benefited alphas

Women’s access to resources should also have influenced their need for – and the value of – male parental investment (Gowaty 1992a; 1992b). Because parental investment often has diminishing marginal returns (see Cashdan 1993), men’s resources may have been less important when women had sufficient resources of their own

Modern women is slutty

Unrestricted women (who are more likely to engage in short-term >mating) tend to be more socially dominant, more extroverted, and less harm-avoidant(Gangestad & Simpson 1990)

Game is the natural outcome of feminism and a rational response to the selection pressures of modern life.It is against a hostile world bent on pussy-whipping men to beta's will the true alphas rise

Whereas women “tracked” their environment, men tracked and adjusted their mating tactics and preferences to the behavior of women (Thiessen 1994).......

Alphas get the bulk of P*ssy

If women’s “demand” for genetic benefits increased, some men >especially those advertising such benefits) dedicated more effort to >short-term, extra-pair mating tactics, thereby increasing variance in mating success among men

Read the whole paper it's literally the Red pill. Edit: Formatting and Typos