The correction to Female freedom is male freedom. If men need to be economically attractive, then we just admitted females are economically unattractive to smart men and why there area not many 'good men' available.

Diogeneplz1 · 2019-09-08T17:58:03+00:00

Not only most females are economically unattracted, but relationship, in general, are also economically unattractive to economically attractive men.

I was raised to be a "provider" from very early age, I was saving my summer job money when I was 14, I was a nerd studying in order to get good grades and therefore good jobs in the future; all so that a good woman would take me as a husband.

In exchange, I was going to have a wife and a marriage, with all the implication of having wife and marriage: sex, stability, comfort, someone who is more than a friend, a partner in life, something forever etc.........

Well, those benefits are no longer there, they are diminished in quantity, quality and duration; so more and more men realize that a relationship no longer worth what it was once worth; add to the the ease of procuring sex NSA: game, legal sex workers, sex substitutes.

And all of the above is not a fluke nor a fad, it's the beginning of a very long term trend. And we're reaching the tilting point; that's going to be interesting to observe, since it's going to have deep, fast and radical ramifications into the economy, culture, and politics.

I am enjoying watching all of this unfolding right in front of my own eyes.

betterforitall · 2019-09-08T16:56:24+00:00

Until there is 100% tax on your income the government can't do as much damage to you financially as a woman. So yes, tax me if that's what it takes.

[deleted] · 2019-09-09T00:10:02+00:00

Well.... YES. This is my neural analysis.

So, let's take a couple of "good people" and by good people I mean someone who is:

decent looking, or better.
fit and not fat, or better
financially stable, or better
decent education aligned with decent career, or better

getting into an LTR ;eading to marriage has HUGE economic implications for both parties; so why would one of those 2 parties embark into such a process is the other party was not just as economically attractive as they are?

Consequently, it becomes an economic decision: why buy when you can do a short-term rental or a substitute?

Comments