TheRedArchive exists so that this writing cannot quietly disappear. Deleted accounts, banned subreddits, blogs long since offline — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
Preserving it is not free. The servers, the storage and the bandwidth come out of my own pocket, and the bill grows every month the archive does.
If you believe this record should still be here for whoever comes looking in twenty years, you can help keep it online.
Support the archive
[–]combatmonk14 points [recovered] | Copy Link
Note comment that Asian and White men are the only net tax payers.
Can confirm.
[–]MrMagtow8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Women use children as pawns. As pawns against the father, pawns to ensure financial profit, pawns to ensure a win in divorce. Women are not trustworthy nor honorable, this is their nature.
[–]krenovinspired3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive. Questions such as this are worth it, even if they don't necessarily result in change. It illuminates 1) that feminists DONT want real equality; they seek equity; 2) the abortion argument isn't about children, or population control, as some pro-aborts like to claim; it is about giving women god like powers over life and death; and 3) no matter what they say, feminists want nothing to do with taking responsibility for their actions. The comments on this thread are as fascinating as they are cringe worthy.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
God like powers... nice comparison. The ability to create or destroy creation and yet no accountability to anyone anywhere at anytime.
[–]oohhowjumbo2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I do not agree that abortion is a right as it is the unwarranted killing of a human, however, if it is to remain legal, then men should be able to abort their financial responsibilities to a child they don't want.
[–]roxon891 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Ha! That will be the fucking day.
[–]MichaelSkarn_FBI1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Safe haven laws exist in all 50 states. A woman can deliver a baby, then drop it off at any hospital, police or fire station, not have to answer any questions if she choses not to, and effectively abandon the child with zero legal consequences. I’m not arguing that it’s right, in fact, I can understand the logic behind the law.
My issue is simple equally. Women have this option. Men should have it, too. It’s funny how feminists always claim to be for equality, but only push for equality when they have a perceived disadvantage.
[–]EndlessPatriotism0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Just an option where the man can be completely absent from the woman's life an owe her nothing.
[–]shadowblackdragon0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah it’s called not having sex, don’t fuck em and you don’t have to deal with their bullshit